We treated 43 patients (38 women and 5 men) with osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb by non-cemented arthroplasty of the first carpometacarpal joint as described by Ledoux. The probability of a patient avoiding revision for 12 months was 62% and for 16 months 59%. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening in 83% and luxation in 17%.

The surviving prostheses were reviewed clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 25.3 months. Pain on loading, movement or at rest was seen in 75% of the patients. There was significant reduction in the range of movement of the trapeziometacarpal joint and of wrist strength. Radiological assessment showed significant subsidence of the stem in the first metacarpal and migration of the cup, with the stem loose in 15% and the cup in 46%.

We no longer recommend this method of joint replacement.

We report ten cases of rupture of the distal part of the tendon of biceps brachii in patients aged from 27 to 58 years. MRI allowed assessment of the degree of retraction of the tendon which was related to the integrity of the bicipital expansion. When the retraction exceeded 8 cm the expansion was always ruptured. When there was doubt, or in longstanding injury, MRI allowed the lesions to be defined.

Surgical repair was by reinsertion on the radial tuberosity at one or two fixation points in eight patients and reinsertion on the anterior brachial muscle in one. The other patient refused surgery. The MRI findings were confirmed at operation. Use of fixation points allowed minimal intervention, thereby reducing the risk of damaging the radial nerve. One year after operation, dynamometric evaluation of the strength of flexion and supination confirmed that the best results were obtained by reinsertion to the radial tuberosity.

A distinctive and consistent pattern of degenerative change was seen in 560 acromioclavicular joints from dry bone skeletons of subjects over 40 years of age. An appreciation of this characteristic configuration is helpful at operation or when introducing a needle into the joint.

We report a controlled, prospective study to investigate the effect of treatment by low-energy extracorporeal shock waves on pain in tennis elbow. We assigned at random 100 patients who had had symptoms for more than 12 months to two groups to receive low-energy shock-wave therapy. Group I received a total of 3000 impulses of 0.08 mJ/mm² and group II, the control group, 30 impulses.

The patients were reviewed after 3, 6 and 24 weeks. There was significant alleviation of pain and improvement of function after treatment in group I in which there was a good or excellent outcome in 48% and an acceptable result in 42% at the final review, compared with 6% and 24%, respectively, in group II.

Lesions of the anterior interosseous nerve in the forearm are rare and often misdiagnosed as tendon injuries. A consecutive series of 13 patients with this condition referred for electrodiagnosis is reviewed. Only three had originally a correct clinical diagnosis and three were initially considered to have tendon ruptures.

Five cases were of mechanical origin and seven due to ‘neuritis’. All showed electrophysiological abnormalities, most commonly involving the pronator quadratus. Late spontaneous recovery was common, and only one case had surgical exploration.

We have analysed the Constant-Murley (1987) assessment for 25 patients with shoulder pathology. We found the score easy to use, with low inter- and intraobserver errors, but sufficiently imprecise in repeated measurements to give concern in its use for clinical follow-up of patients.

We have calculated 95% confidence limits for a single assessment to be within 16 to 20 points in most cases. In addition, we found that all our subjects with instability as their main problem scored within five points of the maximum; this suggests that the scoring method may need to be revised for use on these patients.

In nine patients of median age 34 years who had sustained an amputation of the thumb at a median 24 (5 to 131) months previously, we lengthened the first metacarpal by 30 (17 to 36) mm. Seven amputations had been through the proximal phalanx and two through the metacarpal.

The first two patients had autogenous grafting at a second stage, but the other seven had callotasis alone. In these patients the external fixators were removed at a median 189 (115 to 271) days after osteotomy. In six cases the adductor pollicis tendon was transferred proximally and the first web deepened. There was late fracture or palmar flexion of the callus in five patients, but this required further surgery in only one. Treatment was complete at 326 (140 to 489) days after osteotomy. The extended thumb retained its sensitivity; both grasp and key-pinch strength were satisfactory and only one patient felt that the result did not warrant the long course of treatment.

Metacarpal lengthening by this method is a prolonged procedure, but provides a valuable alternative to more complex reconstructions.

A bipolar spacer was inserted for severe arthritic destruction of the shoulder in 14 patients, and followed up for a mean of 5.9 years. In one patient the operation failed because of infection. Two others required revision for loss of low-friction properties which caused loosening of the humeral component.

At the end of the follow-up all the patients showed improvement. The Hospital for Special Surgery pain score had increased from 5.3 to 18.9 and the movement score from 7.5 to 20.1.

We performed a prospective, randomised trial on 106 patients to compare the effects of local corticosteroid injections with physiotherapy as advocated by Cyriax in the treatment of tennis elbow. The main outcome measures were the severity of pain, pain provoked by resisted dorsiflexion of the wrist, and patient satisfaction.

At six weeks 22 of 53 patients in the injection group were free from pain compared with only three in the physiotherapy group. In the corticosteroid-treated group 26 patients had no pain on resisted dorsiflexion of the wrist compared with only three in the physiotherapy group. Thirty-five patients who had injections and 14 who had physiotherapy were satisfied with the outcome of treatment at six weeks. At the final assessment there were 18 excellent and 18 good results in the corticosteroid group and one excellent and 12 good results in the physiotherapy group. There was a significant increase in grip strength in both groups but those with injections had a significantly better result.

After one year there were no significant differences between the two groups. Half of the patients, however, had received only the initial treatment, 20% had had combined therapy and 30% had had surgery.

We conclude that at six weeks, treatment with corticosteroid injections was more effective than Cyriax physiotherapy and we recommend it because of its rapid action, reduction of pain and absence of side-effects.