Aims. The use of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components has increased during the past decade. The initial design of cementless metal-backed patellar components had shown high failure rates due to many factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of a second-generation cementless, metal-backed patellar component of a modern design. Methods. This was a retrospective review of 707 primary TKAs in 590 patients from a single institution, using a cementless, metal-backed patellar component with a mean follow-up of 6.9 years (2 to 12). A total of 409 TKAs were performed in 338 females and 298 TKAs in 252 males. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (34 to 87) and their mean BMI was 34.3 kg/m. 2. (18.8 to 64.5). The patients were chosen to undergo a cementless procedure based on age and preoperative radiological and intraoperative bone quality. Outcome was assessed using the Knee Society knee and function scores and range of motion (ROM), complications, and revisions. Results. A total of 24 TKAs (3.4%) in 24 patients failed and required revision surgery, of which five were due to patellar complications (0.71%): one for aseptic patellar loosening (0.14%) and four for polyethylene dissociation (0.57%). A total of 19 revisions (2.7%) were undertaken in 19 patients for indications which did not relate to the patella: four for aseptic tibial loosening (0.57%), one for aseptic femoral loosening (0.14%), nine for periprosthetic infection (1.3%), one for popliteus impingement (0.14%), and four for instability (0.57%). Knee Society knee and function scores, and ROM, improved significantly when comparing pre- and postoperative values. Survival of the metal-backed patellar component for all-cause failure was 97.5% (95% confidence interval 94.9% to 100%) at 12 years. Conclusion. The second-generation cementless TKA design of metal-backed patellar components showed a 97.5% survival at 12 years, with polyethylene dissociation from the metal-backing being the most common cause of patellar failure. In view of the increased use of TKA, especially in younger, more active, or obese patients, these findings are encouraging at mean follow-up of seven years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(12):1279–1285

Introduction. Persistent patellofemoral (PF) pain is a common postoperative complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the USA, patella resurfacing is conducted in more than 80% of primary TKAs [1], and is, therefore, an important factor during surgery. Studies have revealed that the position of the patellar component is still controversially discussed [2–4]. However, only a limited number of studies address the biomechanical impact of patellar component malalignment on PF dynamics [2]. Hence, the purpose of our present study was to analyze the effect of patellar component positioning on PF dynamics by means of musculoskeletal multibody simulation in which a detailed knee joint model resembled the loading of an unconstrained cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee replacement (TKR) with dome patella button. Material and Methods. Our musculoskeletal multibody model simulation of a dynamic squat motion bases on the SimTK data set (male, 88 years, 66.7 kg) [5] and was implemented in the multibody dynamics software SIMPACK (V9.7, Dassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Gilching, Germany). The model served as a reference for our parameter analyses on the impact on the patellar surfacing, as it resembles an unconstrained CR-TKR (P.F.C. Sigma, DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN) while offering the opportunity for experimental validation on the basis of instrumented implant components [5]. Relevant ligaments and muscle structures were considered within the model. Muscle forces were calculated using a variant of the computed muscle control algorithm. PF and tibiofemoral (TF) joints were modeled with six degrees of freedom by implementing a polygon-contact model, enabling roll-glide kinematics. Relative to the reference model, we analyzed six patellar component alignments: superior-inferior position, mediolateral position, patella spin, patella tilt, flexion-extension and thickness. The effect of each configuration was evaluated by taking the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the PF contact force, patellar shift and patellar tilt with respect to the reference model along knee flexion angle. Results. The analysis showed that the PF contact force was mostly affected by patellar component thickness (RMSE=440 N) as well as superior-inferior (RMSE=199 N), and mediolateral (RMSE=98 N) positioning.. PF kinematics was mostly affected by mediolateral positioning, patellar component thickness, and superior-inferior positioning. Medialization of the patellar component reduced the peak PF contact force and caused a lateral patellar shift. Discussion. Based on our findings, we conclude that malalignment in mediolateral and superior-inferior direction, tilt and thickness of patellar resurfacing are the most important intraoperative parameters to affect PF dynamics. It could be shown that the translational positioning is more critical than rotational positioning regarding PF contact force. Reported findings are in good agreement with previous experimental and clinical studies [2–4]. Our data reveal that patellar component positioning has to be aligned precisely during total knee arthroplasty to prevent postoperative complications. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction:. The widespread use of TKA promoted studies on kinematics after TKA, particularly of the femorotibial joint. Knee joint kinematics after TKA, including the range of motion (ROM) and the physical performance, are also influenced by the biomechanical properties of the patella. Surgeons sometimes report complications after TKA involvinganterior knee pain, patellofemoral impingement and instability. However, only few studies have focused specially on the patella. Because the patella bone is small and overlapped with the femoral component on scan images. In addition, the patellar component in TKA is made of x-ray–permeable ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. It is impossible to radiographically determine the external contour of the patellar component precisely. No methods have been established to date to track the dynamic in vivo trajectory of the patella component. In this study, we analyzed the in vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the patellar component in TKA by applying our image matching method with image correlations. Methods:. A computed tomography (CT) and an x-ray flat panel detector system (FPD) were used. FPD-derived post-TKA x-ray images of the residual patellar bone were matched by computer simulation with the virtual simulation images created using pre-TKA CT data. For the anatomic location of the patellar component, the positions of the holes drilled for the patellar component pegs were used. This study included three patients with a mean age of 68 years (three females with right knee replacement) who had undergone TKA with the Quest Knee System and achieved a mean passive ROM of 0 to ≥ 130° after 6 or more month post-TKA. We investigated three-dimensional movements of the patellar component in six degrees of freedom (6 DOF) during squatting and kneeling. Furthermore, we simulated the three-dimensional movement of the patellar component, and we estimated and visualized the contact points between the patellar and femoral components on a three-dimensional model. Results:. Average root mean square errors of this technique with the patellar bone of a fresh-frozen pig complete knee joint have been confirmed as 0.2 mm for the translations and 0.2 degrees for the rotation. The 6 DOF analysis results showed that patellar dynamics were similar for all subjects on squatting and kneeling. For the patellar rotation during squatting, only 1 to 2 additional degrees were noted for all subjects. During kneeling, the patellar rotation noted adduction for all subjects. The patellar contact point on the femoral component gradually showed superior shift, increasing the distance with knee flexion during squatting and kneeling (Fig, 1. 2). Discussions and Conclusions:. In this study, no patellar shifts were detected in rotation or tilt during squatting, suggesting that the patellar component remained in the positions designed for early stages of flexion. And the patellar component shifted towards the lateral side during squatting. This finding suggests the idea that the patellar movement reflected the design of the Quest Knee system. This study demonstrated that the analytical method is useful for evaluating the pathologies and post-surgical conditions of the knee and other joints

Aims: The aim of the study was to determine the efþcacy of jet lavage in comparison to syringe lavage with respect to cement penetration and stability of the poly-ethylene patellar component after patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Methods: In a cadaver study, we prepared 37 fresh frozen human patella pairs. The retropatellar bed was randomly cleaned with either jet lavage or a bladder syringe. The polyethylene component was cemented using Palacos R. For 12 patella pairs, sagittal sections were obtained at predeþned levels using a diamond saw. Mikroradiograms were digitised and analysed with respect to cement penetration. For the remaining 25 patella pairs, pullout tests were performed on patellar components using a traction-compression device. Results: Cement penetration was signiþcantly greater (P< 0.0001) in the jet lavage specimens compared to the syringe lavage specimens. The maximum force required to cause mechanical failure was signiþcantly greater (P< 0,0001) in jet lavage specimens compared to syringe lavage specimens. Conclusions: Our results support the routine use of jet lavage for cleansing the patellar bed prior to cement application in cemented patellar resurfacing

Purpose: Patellar complications are among the most frequent after total knee arthroplasty. Encasing the patellar piece is one way of resisting the shear forces leading to loosening. Material and Methods: We studied at more than five years the results obtained with a total knee prosthesis implanted with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). This prosthesis has an asymmetric encased patellar insert with a cemented central pivot. The instrumentation ensures patellar thickness. We reviewed 104 implants at more than five years. Six had been lost to follow-up. Ninety-eight implants were still in place. Results: The following complications were observed: four fractures of the upper rim with little displacement (these fractures healed and pain regressed but the insert had moved); three vertical patellar fractures with little displacement (these fractures healed; two were symptomatic temporarily); one transverse fracture of the upper pole with displacement causing a defect in active extension; eight moderate asymptomatic impactions which were visible on the lateral x-ray (modified orientation of the insert with cement fracture). There was no significant difference for functional results (pain 40.9; movement 21.9; knee score 84.3) between patients with or without a patellar complication. Discussion: Insertion of an asymmetric prosthesis increased the risk of an orientation error (two cases early in our experience). Encasing the patellar insert limits medialisation yet the centering was satisfactory (centred patella 95.2%, shift 3.6%, subluxation 1.2%). Encasing provides a peripheral wall protecting against transverse sheer forces. The lateral wall did not fracture, demonstrating its efficacy. The upper wall can fracture under the force of flexion without functional consequences. The other fractures, favoured by section of the lateral patellar wing (p< 0.05), were not treated. Moderate but certain impaction was noted in eight cases at a mean 3.5 years (1–6 years). It was due to failure of bony support under the effect of the compression forces applied on a small surface. The diameter of the encased patellar inserts was rarely more than 25 mm. Once the prosthesis is in place, the periphery of the patella is the only component articulating with the trochlea and its impaction does not cause further aggravation. This contact did not lead to pain in any patients. Conclusions: Complications observed with encased patellar components differ from the better known apposed prostheses

Purpose: Patellar complications are among the most frequent after total knee arthroplasty. Encasing the patellar piece is one way of resisting the shear forces leading to loosening. Material and methods: We studied at more than five years the results obtained with a total knee prosthesis implanted with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). This prosthesis has an asymmetric encased patellar insert with a cemented central pivot. The instrumentation ensures patellar thickness. We reviewed 104 implants at more than five years. Six had been lost to follow-up. Ninety-eight implants were still in place. Results: The following complications were observed: four fractures of the upper rim with little displacement (these fractures healed and pain regressed but the insert had moved); three vertical patellar fractures with little displacement (these fractures healed; two were symptomatic temporarily); one transverse fracture of the upper pole with displacement causing a defect in active extension; eight moderate asymptomatic impactions which were visible on the lateral x-ray (modified orientation of the insert with cement fracture). There was no significant difference for functional results (pain 40.9; movement 21.9; knee score 84.3) between patients with or without a patellar complication. Discussion: Insertion of an asymmetric prosthesis increased the risk of an orientation error (two cases early in our experience). Encasing the patellar insert limits medialisation yet the centering was satisfactory (centred patella 95.2%, shift 3.6%, subluxation 1.2%). Encasing provides a peripheral wall protecting against transverse sheer forces. The lateral wall did not fracture, demonstrating its efficacy. The upper wall can fracture under the force of flexion without functional consequences. The other fractures, favoured by section of the lateral patellar wing (p< 0.05), were not treated. Moderate but certain impaction was noted in eight cases at a mean 3.5 years (1–6 years). It was due to failure of bony support under the effect of the compression forces applied on a small surface. The diameter of the encased patellar inserts was rarely more than 25 mm. Once the prosthesis is in place, the periphery of the patella is the only component articulating with the trochlea and its impaction does not cause further aggravation. This contact did not lead to pain in any patients. Conclusions: Complications observed with encased patellar components differ from the better known apposed prostheses

Aims. Our intention was to investigate if the highly porous biological fixation surfaces of a new 3D-printed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) achieved adequate fixation of the tibial and patellar components to the underlying bone. Patients and Methods. A total of 29 patients undergoing primary TKA consented to participate in this prospective cohort study. All patients received a highly porous tibial baseplate and metal-backed patella. Patient-reported outcomes measures were recorded and implant migration was assessed using radiostereometric analysis. Results. Patient function significantly improved by three months postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean difference in maximum total point motion between 12 and 24 months was 0.021 mm (-0.265 to 0.572) for the tibial implant and 0.089 mm (-0.337 to 0.758) for the patellar implant. The rate of tibial and patellar migration was largest over the first six postoperative weeks, with no changes in mean tibia migration occurring after six months, and no changes in mean patellar migration occurring after six weeks. One patellar component showed a rapid rate of migration between 12 and 24 months. Conclusion. Biological fixation appears to occur reliably on the highly porous implant surface of the tibial baseplate and metal-backed patellar component. Rapid migration after 12 months was measured for one patellar component. Further investigation is required to assess the long-term stability of the 3D-printed components and to determine if the high-migrating components achieve fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):40–47

Abstract. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty (PFA) is an alternative to TKA for patellofemoral osteoarthritis that preserves tibiofemoral compartments. It is unknown how implant positioning affects biomechanics, especially regarding the patella. This study analysed biomechanical effects of femoral and patellar component position, hypothesising femoral positioning is more important. Nine cadaveric knees were studied using a repeated-measures protocol. Knees were tested intact, then after PFA implanted in various positions: neutral (as-planned), patellar over/understuffing (±2mm), patellar tilt, patellar flexion, femoral rotation, and femoral tilt (all ±6°). Arthroplasties were implemented with CT-designed patient-specific instrumentation. Anterior femoral cuts referenced Whiteside's line and all femoral positions ensured smooth condyle-to-component transition. Knee extension moments, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) length-change, and tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics were measured under physiological muscle loading. Data were analysed with one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (Bonferroni-Holm corrected). PFA changed knee function, altering extension moments (p<0.001) and patellofemoral kinematics (p<0.05), but not tibiofemoral kinematics. Patellar component positioning affected patellofemoral kinematics: over/understuffing influenced patellar anterior translation and the patellar tendon moment arm (p<0.001). Medially tilted patellar cuts produced lateral patellar tilt (p<0.001) and vice versa. A similar inverse effect occurred with extended/flexed patellar cuts, causing patellar flexion and extension (p<0.001), respectively. Of all variants, only extending the patellar cut produced near-native extension moments throughout. Conversely, the only femoral effect was MPFL length change between medially/laterally rotated components. PFA can restore native knee biomechanics. Provided anterior femoral cuts are controlled and smooth condyle-to-component transition assured, patellar position affects biomechanics more than femoral, contradicting the hypothesis

Abstract. Objectives. Patella resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a contentious issue. Australian rates of patellar resurfacing are 66.6%, significantly higher compared to UK rates of 8–15% and Swedish rates of 2%. Resurfacing has gained popularity in Australia since registry data has shown decreased revision rates with no increase in patellar component related complications. We present for discussion an analysis of 113,694 total knee arthroplasties using commonly implanted prostheses in the UK. Methods. We included all TKA's since the Australian register's conception on 01/09/1999 for a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis involving the use of either the Triathlon or Duracon implant with and without patellar components. The primary outcome of the study was time to revision for Triathlon's resurfaced and non-resurfaced prosthesis compared to the Duracon's equivalent data. We also analysed the reasons for revision between the 4 groups, type of revision and complication rates. We then compared minimally stabilised and posterior stabilised prostheses. Results. The cumulative revision rate for Triathlon prostheses with resurfacing after 12 years was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.9% to 3.6%) compared to 5.6% (95% CI, 5.0% to 6.2%) without resurfacing. Duracon's equivalent data was 6.3% with resurfacing and 5.9% without resurfacing. Triathlon prosthesis with resurfacing have much lower rates of revision due to loosening, patellofemoral pain, patellar erosion compared to unresurfaced Triathlon prostheses. Conclusion. Triathlon with re-surfacing has lower revision rates regardless of age or BMI. Previous concerns regarding patellofemoral loosening, tibial wear, maltracking relate to Duracon only, indicating the importance of implant specific studies. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. We have been re-evaluating patellofemoral alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by using a weight- bearing axial radiographic view after detecting patellar maltracking (lateral tilt > 5° or lateral subluxation > 5 mm) on standard non-weight-bearing axial radiographs. However, it is unclear whether the patellar component shape affects this evaluation method. Therefore, we compared 2 differently shaped components on weight-bearing axial radiographs. Methods. From 2004 to 2013, 408 TKAs were performed with the same type of posterior-stabilized total knee implant at our hospital. All patellae were resurfaced with an all-polyethylene, three-pegged component to restore original thickness. Regarding patellar component type, an 8-mm domed component was used when the patella was so thin that a 10-mm bone cut could not be performed. Otherwise, a 10-mm medialized patellar component was selected. Twenty-five knees of 25 patients, in whom patellar maltracking was noted on standard axial radiographs at the latest follow-up, were included in this study. Knees were divided into 2 groups: 15 knees received a medialized patella (group M) while 10 received a domed patella (group D). Weight-bearing axial radiographs with patients in the semi-squatting position were recorded with the method of Baldini et al. Patellar alignment (tilt and subluxation) was measured according to the method described by Gomes et al. using both standard and weight-bearing axial views. Results. Patients’ demographic data, such as age at surgery, sex, and disease were similar for both groups. The average follow-up period was significantly longer in group D than group M (5.4 years vs. 2.5 years, respectively; p = 0.0045, Mann- Whitney U-test). The lateral tilt angle decreased significantly (p < 0.0001, paired t-test) from 6.5° ± 2.8° to 1.0° ± 1.2° with weight bearing in group M. However, this parameter in group D changed from 6.7° ± 2.7° to 4.7° ± 3.0° with weight bearing; the difference was not significant. Lateral subluxation also decreased significantly (p < 0.0001, paired t-test) from 5.1 mm ± 2.4 mm to 2.5 mm ± 1.4 mm with weight bearing in group M. However, that in group D changed from 2.8 mm ± 2.7 mm to 2.4 mm ± 2.8 mm with weight bearing, and the difference was not significant. On weight-bearing views, patellar maltracking was noted in 4 knees in group D but no knees in group M. The difference was significant (p = 0.017, Fisher's exact test). One of the 21 patients with adequate patellar tracking (4.8%) and 1 of 4 patients with maltracking (25%) complained of mild anterior knee pain. Discussion. Patellar tracking on axial radiographic views improved better in group M than in group D with weight bearing. The patellofemoral contact area was maintained with a domed patella despite tilting, but not with a medialized patella. Our results indicate that the shape difference affected the degree of radiographic improvement. Thus, the weight-bearing axial radiographic view devised by Baldini et al. is useful for evaluating patellofemoral alignment after TKA, but the shape of the patellar component should be considered for result interpretation

One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines. The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58°; 0.14° to 29.9°) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36°; 0.55° to 39.19°). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25°; 0.02° to 10.52°) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51°; 0.07° to 9.89°) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20°; 5.80° to 16.72°) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57°; 1.40° to 4.56°) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54°; 0.91° to 9.39°), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39°; 0.04° to 4.56°). There was no significant difference (p > 0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion. The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation

Complications of the patellofemoral (PF) joint remain a common cause for revision of total knee replacements. PF complications, such as patellar maltracking, subluxation, dislocation and implant failure, have been linked to femoral and patellar component alignment. Computational analyses represent an efficient method for investigating the effects of patellar and femoral component alignment and loading on output measures related to long term clinical success (i.e. kinematics, contact mechanics) and can be utilized to make direct comparisons between common patellar component design types. Prior PF alignment studies have generally involved perturbing a single alignment parameter independently, without accounting for interaction effects between multiple parameters. The objective of the current study was to determine critical alignment parameters, and combinations of parameters, in three patellar component designs, and assess whether the critical parameters were design specific. A dynamic finite element (FE) model of an implanted PF joint was applied in conjunction with a 100-trial Monte Carlo probabilistic simulation to establish relationships between alignment and loading parameters and PF kinematics, contact mechanics and internal stresses (Figure 1). Seven parameters, including femoral internal-external (I-E) alignment, patellar I-E, flexion-extension (F∗∗∗∗∗E) and adduction-abduction (A-A) rotational alignment, and patellar medial-lateral (M-L) and superior-inferior (S-I) translational alignment, as well as percentage of the quadriceps load on the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) tendon, were perturbed in the probabilistic analysis. Ten output parameters, including 6-DOF PF kinematics, peak PF contact pressure, contact area, peak von Mises stress and M-L force due to contact, were evaluated at 80 intervals during a simulated deep knee bend. Three types of patellar component designs were assessed; a dome-compatible patellar component (dome), a medialized dome-compatible patellar component (modified dome), and an anatomic component (anatomic). Model-predicted bounds at 5 and 95% confidence levels were determined for each output parameter throughout the range of femoral flexion (Figure 2). Traditional sensitivity analysis, in addition to a previously described coupled probabilistic and principal component analysis (probabilistic-PCA) approach, were applied to determine the relative importance of alignment and loading parameters to knee mechanics in each of the three designs. The dome component demonstrated the least amount of variation in contact mechanics and internal stresses, particularly in the 30–100° flexion range, with respect to alignment and loading variability. The modified dome had substantially reduced M-L contact force when compared with the dome. The anatomic design, while wide bounds of variability were predicted, had consistently greater contact area and lowered contact pressure than the dome and modified dome designs. The anatomic design also reproduced more natural sagittal plane patellar tilt than the other components. All three designs were most sensitivity to femoral I-E alignment. Thereafter, sensitivity to component alignment was design specific; for the anatomic component, the main alignment parameter was F-E, while for the domed components it was a combination of F-E and translation (M-L and S-I) (Figure 3). Understanding the relationships and design-specific dependencies between alignment parameters can add value to surgical pre-operative planning, and may help focus instrumentation design on those alignment parameters of primary concern

INTRODUCTION. Wear and fracture of patellar components has been frequently reported as a failure mode for cemented and press-fit patellar components. Malalignment of the patellar components may cause higher contact stresses, which may lead to excessive wear, delamination, and/or component fracture. In vitro testing of the patella in a clinically relevant malaligned condition is necessary to demonstrate adequate performance of the patellar component and assess the endurance of its fixation features under severe loading conditions. The purpose of this study was to test in vitro the patellar components under malaligned conditions using a knee joint simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 6 station MTS (Eden Prairie, MN) knee joint wear simulator and Alpha Calf Fraction serum (Hyclone Labs, Logan, UT) diluted to 50% with a pH-balanced 20-mMole solution of deionized water and EDTA was used (protein level = 20 g/l) for testing. Asymmetric, all-polyethylene, patellar components with an overall construct thickness of 11 mm (Duracon®, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) were used. Appropriately sized cobalt-chrome femoral components articulated against the patellae. The patellae were cemented (Simplex, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) to delrin fixtures, which placed the patella in 10° of lateral tilt (Figure 1). This angle was chosen based off the work of Huang et al, which was one of the larger average tilt angles reported in vivo. Replicating this scenario in vitro allows for observation of the potential scenario that may occur as the femoral component maintains contact strictly on the thinner lateral edge of the patella, concentrating both the axial and shear loads on a small area of polyethylene. The loading and kinematic profiles used for testing were published previously (maximum axial load: 2450N and maximum patellofemoral angle: 54°. Variations of the loading profile were studied by evaluating the effects of heavier patients, which increased the maximum axial load to 3100N(250lb patient) and 3750N(300lb patient) (Figure 2). Lateral offset was tested to evaluate the effect of malalignment. Increments of 1mm were analyzed starting from the neutral position, eventually reaching a maximum lateral offset of 5mm. A 6-dof load cell was placed beneath the patella fixturing to capture dynamic loads (ATI, Apex, NC). The axial and medial/lateral shear loads where used to calculate the resultant medial/lateral shear force being applied to the patellar pegs. RESULTS. The results of using a heavier loading profile and increasing lateral offset are shown in Figure 3. At neutral alignment, the effect of increasing the axial load caused an increase of 10% in resultant shear force. At 5 mm of lateral offset, the increase in loading caused the shear force to increase by 16%. With each loading profile, increasing the lateral offset from 0 to 5 mm caused the resultant shear force to increase two-fold. DISCUSSION. This test model allows for an aggressive method of testing patellar implants and it includes variables to adjust for severity (lateral offset and joint reaction force). Although increasing the amount of lateral patellar offset increases the resultant shear forces, the patellar wear rates remained minimal and constant. Hence, a femoral component that has a forgiving patellar tracking may demonstrate minimal wear, even when evaluated in extremely aggressive test conditions. Note: These results are specific to the device used since the results will be dependant on the function and design of the patellar implant and patella/femur track

Introduction. A large number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, particularly in Japan, India and the Middle East, exhibit anatomy with substantial proximal tibial torsion. Alignment of the tibial components with the standard anterior-posterior (A-P) axis of the tibia can result in excessive external rotation of the tibial components with respect to femoral component alignment. This in turn influences patellofemoral (PF) mechanics and forces required by the extensor mechanism. The purpose of the current study was to determine if a rotating-platform (RP) TKA design with an anatomic patellar component reduced compromise to the patellar tendon, quadriceps muscles and PF mechanics when compared to a fixed-bearing (FB) design with a standard dome-shaped patellar component. Methods. A dynamic three-dimensional finite element model of the knee joint was developed and used to simulate a deep knee bend in a patient with excessive external tibial torsion (Figure 1). Detailed description of the model has been previously published [1]. The model included femur, tibia and patellar bones, TKA components, patellar ligament, quadriceps muscles, PF ligaments, and nine primary ligaments spanning the TF joint. The model was virtually implanted with two contemporary TKA designs; a FB design with domed patella, and a RP design with anatomic patella. The FB design was implanted in two different alignment conditions; alignment to the tibial A-P axis, and optimal alignment for bone coverage. Four different loading conditions (varying internal-external (I-E) torque and A-P force) were applied to the model to simulate physiological loads during a deep knee bend. Quadriceps muscle force, patellar tendon force, and PF and TF joint forces were compared between designs. Results. The RP design demonstrated consistently lower medial-lateral (M-L) force at the PF joint than the FB design, with greater differences between designs in later flexion once the patella was engaged in the sulcus groove; root-mean-square (RMS) differences in M-L force averaged 50 N less in the RP design throughout the flexion cycle, and 70 N less after 45° flexion (Figure 2). The FB design aligned for optimal bone coverage demonstrated 15% higher M-L forces than the FB design aligned with the tibial A-P axis. RMS load required by the quadriceps muscle was 60 N lower with the RP design than the FB design throughout the cycle (Figure 2). Discussion. Comparing a RP design with an anatomic patellar component and a FB design with a domed patellar component, the RP design demonstrated lower M-L PF joint and soft-tissue extensor mechanism forces. Differences were more pronounced under conditions of high I-E torque where the RP design accommodated large relative TF rotation. Differences in FB alignment resulted in substantially different PF M-L forces; when the FB component was mal-aligned with respect to the tibial A-P axis (and the line-of-action of the patellar tendon) the resulting M-L PF force was increased. The RP design reduced the demands on the extensor mechanism and loads on the PF joint and facilitated better coverage of the resected tibial bone surface

Many recent knee prostheses are designed aiming to the physiological knee kinematics on tibiofemoral joint, which means the femoral rollback and medial pivot motion. However, there have been few studies how to design a patellar component. Since patella and tibia are connected by a patellar tendon, tibiofemoral and patellofemoral motion or contact forces might affect each other. In this study, we aimed to discuss the optimal design of patellar component and simulated the knee flexion using four types of patellar shape during deep knee flexion. Our simulation model calculates the position/orientation, contact points and contact forces by inputting knee flexion angle, muscle forces and external forces. It can be separated into patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints. On each joint, calculations are performed using the condition of point contact and force/moment equilibrium. First, patellofemoral was calculated and output patellar tendon force, and tibiofemoral was calculated with patellar tendon force as external force. Then patellofemoral was calculated again, and the calculation was repeated until the position/orientation of tibia converged. We tried four types of patellar shape, circular dome, cylinder, plate and anatomical. Femoral and tibial surfaces are created from Scorpio NRG PS (Stryker Co.). Condition of knee flexion was passive, with constant muscle forces and varying external force acting on tibia. Knee flexion angle was from 80 to 150 degrees. As a result, the internal rotation of tibia varied much by using anatomical or plate patella than dome or cylinder shape. Although patellar contact force did not change much, tibial contact balances were better on dome and cylinder patella and the medial contact forces were larger than lateral on anatomical and plate patella. Thus, the results could be divided into two types, dome/cylinder and plate/anatomical. It might be caused by the variations of patellar rotation angle were large on anatomical and plate patella, though patellar tilt angles were similar in all the cases. We have already reported that the anatomical shape of patella would contact in good medial-lateral balance when tibia moved physiologically, therefore we have predicted the anatomical patella might facilitate the physiological tibiofemoral motion. However, the results were not as we predicted. Actually our previous and this study are not in the same condition; we used a posterior-stabilized type of prosthesis, and the post and cam mechanism could not make the femur roll back during deep knee flexion. It might be better to choose dome or cylinder patella to obtain the stability of tibiofemoral joint, and to choose anatomical or plate to the mobility

Introduction. Uncemented highly porous titanium implants have been shown to promote osseointegration, and may result in a durable construct for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the mixed results of uncemented TKA, it is important to evaluate the early stability for this product. The objective of the following study was to use radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to assess early fixation of a highly porous tibial baseplate and metal backed patella. Methods. Twenty-seven patients (mean age 64 years, 30% female) undergoing primary TKA consented to participate in this prospective cohort study. All patients received a highly porous tibial baseplate, a metal backed patella and tantalum RSA bone markers. Implant migration was assessed using model-based RSA at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operative. Patient reported outcome measures were captured using the same follow-up schedule, and compared to pre-operative measures. Results. There were no adverse events affecting implant fixation, and no revisions. Patient function significantly improved by 3 months post-operation (p < 0.001). The highest rate of tibia and patellar component migration occurred over the first six post-operative weeks, with minimal migration thereafter. Mean maximum total point motion (MTPM) at 24 months was 0.72 (SD 0.34) mm for the tibia, and 0.44 (SD 0.25) mm for the patella. Three tibia baseplates migrated more than 1 standard deviation greater than the mean at 24 months, and also had continuous migration (> 0.2mm of MTPM) in the second post-operative year. One patellar component showed a rapid rate of migration between 6 and 24 months, whereas all other patellar components appeared to stabilize. Conclusions. Osseointegration appears to occur on the highly porous implant surface of the tibia baseplate and metal backed patella, as evidenced by implant stability. Further follow-up is required to determine if clinical loosening will manifest in the continuously migrating implants

Introduction A biomechanical model was developed to measure wear of all-polyethylene patellar components as it relates to femoral component mal-rotation. The model, based on high load and flexion activities such as stair climbing, was used to differentiate the effects of femoral mal-rotation and differing materials on a single patellar design. Methods The patellar components (Scorpio®, Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics) were cemented onto metal fixtures and articulated against “aligned” and “mal-aligned” (six degrees internally rotated) femoral components. The patellar components were subjected to a constant force and articulated against femoral components flexing from 600 to 1200. Patellae of identical geometry, made of conventional and highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, were tested to 1x106 cycles. Following testing, patellar wear was determined by gravimetric measurement relative to soaked control specimens. Results All conventional polyethylene patellae demonstrated damage in the form of burnishing and scratching of the articular surface. The mal-aligned conventional ultra-high molecular weight patellae demonstrated increased weight loss or wear relative to the aligned components (p=.048). All rotationally mal-aligned highly cross-linked polyethylene components sustained polyethylene fracture or catastrophic failure of the cement-polyethylene construct. Conclusions Rotational mal-alignment of the femoral component will result in increased wear of polyethylene patellar components. The newer highly cross-linked materials failed to resolve this wear problem and sustained catastrophic failure when mal-aligned. Attention needs to be given to the patella-femoral articulation when implanting knee components and when developing new polyethylene as the forces in this articulation may result in polyethylene behaviour that varies dramatically from the femoraltibial articulation. In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors has received, or is likely to receive direct material benefits

INTRODUCTION: Following Total Knee Arthroplasties, patellofemoral complications have shown to be responsible for approximately 50% of re-operations. Contemporary patellar designs employ both “onlay” and “inset” configurations. The latter promotes ease of placement, reduced bone removal and a heralded theoretic advantage of increased strength at the fixation interface. However, to date, no reports have compared the disassociation strengths of these two patellar component modes of fixation. The purpose of this study is to quantify the shear disassociation strength for both onlay and inset patellar fixation techniques. METHODS: Two sets of synthetic solid foam patellae were prepared using standard milling techniques for symmetrical, three-peg onlay and inset polyethylene cylinders of identical dimension. The use of synthetic bones in mechanical testing was validated in the past. The cylinders were cemented to the synthetic patellae, using standard cementing techniques. The fixation resistance of both groups was measured using an Instron Testing Machine. A compressive joint force simulating chair rise was applied perpendicular to the anterior surface of the patellar component model. A shearing displacement was then applied to the composite until patellar component disassociation. RESULTS: The mean shear strength of the onlay group was 2540 N SD 236 N, (n=7) and 3180 N SD 186 N, (n=6) for the inset group. The inset patellae was 25% (640 N) stronger than the onlay patellae, (p=0.0002, two-tailed student t-test). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrated a significantly higher resistance of inset patellar fixation to shear stress compared to onlay patellar fixation. Although further in-vivo studies are indicated, the data suggests that the use of inset patella in total knee replacements may offer stronger fixation and consequently decreasing morbidity associated with patella implant loosening

Purpose. Measurements of patellar kinematics are essential to investigate the link between anterior knee pain following knee arthroplasty and patellar maltracking. A major challenge in studying the patellofemoral (PF) joint postoperatively is that the patellar component is only partially visible in the sagittal and close-to-sagittal radiographs. The narrow angular distance between these radiographs makes the application of conventional bi-planar fluoroscopy impossible. In this study a methodology has been introduced and validated for accurate estimation of the 3D kinematics of the PF joint post-arthroplasty using a novel multi-planar fluoroscopy approach. Method. An optoelectronic camera (Optotrak Certus) was used to track the motion of an ISO-C fluoroscopy C-arm (Siemens Siremobil) using two sets of markers attached to the X-ray source and detector housings. The C-arm was used in the Digital Radiography (DR) mode, which resembles an ordinary X-ray fluoroscopy image. A previously-developed technique (Cho et al., 2005; Daly et al., 2008) was adapted to find the geometric parameters of the imaging system. Thirty-eight DRs of the calibration phantom were obtained for the 190 of rotation of the C-arm at 5 rotational increments while data from motion markers were recorded continuously at a frequency of 100 Hz. A total knee replacement prosthesis was implanted on an artificial bone model of the knee, and the implant components and bones were rigidly fixed in place using a urethane rigid foam. For the purpose of validation, positions of the implant components were determined using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). Sagittal and obliquely sagittal radiographs of the model were taken where the patellar component was most visible. For each DR the geometric parameters of the system were interpolated based on the location of the motion markers. The exact location of the projection was then determined in 3D space. JointTrack Bi-plane software (Dr. Scott Banks, University of Florida, Gainesville) was used to conduct 2D-3D registration between the radiographs and the reverse-engineered models of the implant components. Results of the registration were directly compared to the ground-truth obtained from the CMM to calculate the accuracies. Results. The accuracies for the PF were found to be 0.48 mm and 1.32 for position and orientation of the components. For the tibiofemoral joint these values were found to be 0.89 mm and 1.43, respectively. Conclusion. The multi-planar method can be used to assess the sequential kinematics of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints including the mediolateral translation and tilt of the patellar component, which are obscured in standard 2D sagittal measurements and are not possible using the traditional bi-planar setup. A limitation is that it can only be used for static imaging of the joint. It has the advantage of a relatively low radiation dose. This methodology can be used to investigate the relationship between maltracking of the patella and anterior knee pain as well as other postoperative complications

Introduction/Aim. Outcomes for guided motion primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in obese patients are unknown. Materials and Methods. 1,684 consecutive patients underwent 2,059 primary TKAs with a second-generation guided motion implant (Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Knee System, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis) between 2011–2017 at three European and seven US sites. Results. Of 2,003 (97.3%) TKAs in 1,644 patients with BMI data: average age 64.5 years; 58.4% females; average BMI 32.5 kg/m. 2. ;13.4% had BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. Subjects with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. had longest length of hospital stay (LOS) at European sites; LOS similar at US sites. Subjects with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. (P=0.0349) had longest surgery duration. BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. had more re-hospitalizations or post-TKA reoperations than BMI < 40 kg/m. 2. (12.7% and 9.2% at five-year post-TKA, P<.0495). 62 TKAs were revised (3.39/100 TKA at five years) with no differences in revision risk between groups. 17 (27.4%) revisions involved femoral or tibial component removal; 45 (72.6%) involved tibial insert or patellar component removal only with revision risk similar between groups. Discussion. Our results corroborate literature-reported revision outcomes of standard TKAs in obese patients. Conclusion. Surgery duration and long-term complication rates are higher in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. , but device revision risk is not elevated

Introduction. Patellar tracking in total knee replacements has been extensively studied, but little is known about patellar tracking in isolated patellofemoral replacements. We compared patellar tracking and the position of the patellar groove in the natural knee, followed by implantation of the femoral component of a PFR (patella unresurfaced) and after implantation of the femoral & patellar component of the PFR. Methods. Computer navigation was used to track the patella in eight whole lower extremities of four cadavers in the natural knee, in the same knee with the femoral component of the PFR (PFR-P) and with the femoral and patellar component of the PFR (PFR+P, patella resurfaced) (Depuy Sigma PFR). The form and position of the trochlea in the natural knee and the patellar groove of the femoral component was also analysed. Values are means+/−SD, two tailed Student's t-test for paired samples. Results. With a PFR-P the patella had a slightly more lateral tilt (0.8+/−0.8° to 2.8+/−2.5° at 40–100° of flexion, p<0.05 vs. Nat), this was more pronounced with the PFR+P (2.0+/−0.7° to 4.9+/−1.8° at 20–90° flexion, p<0.05 vs. Nat., p<0.05 vs. PFR-P at 20–80° flexion). No differences in patella rotation were seen between the three groups. In the PFR-P group the patella tracked a little more medially compared to the natural knee (0.6+/− 0.7mm to 1.3+/−2.6mm, p<0.05 at 20°,80°,90° flexion). The difference was more pronounced after patella resurfacing (PFR+P) (2.1+/−2.0mm to 3.0+/−2.2mm, p<0.05 vs. Nat. at 10°–100°, p<0.05 vs. PFR-P from 10–100°). When analysed relative to the patellar groove of the trochlea/femoral component the patella in the natural knee tracked slightly lateral to the groove (2.0+/−1.7mm to 2.9+/−2.0mm at 50–100° p<0.05), so did the patella of PFR-P (2.0+/−2.3mm to 2.3+/−2.3mm at 60–90° flexion, p<0.05), whilst the PFR+P tracked right on the groove (0.6+/−3.7mm medially to 0.6+/−2.9mm laterally, p<0.05 vs Nat at 10–30° & 70–100°, p<0.05 vs. PFR-P at 10–100°). Distance from the patellatot the epicondylar axis was slightly larger in the PFR-P group (0.6+/− 0.7mm to 1.3+/−1.4mm, p<0.05 vs. Natu at 20,80 & 90°. This was more pronounced with patellar resurfacing (2.1+/−2.0 to 3.0+/−2.2mm, p<0.05 vs. Nat at 10–100°, p<0.05 vs. PFR-P at 20–100°) The patella groove on the natural knee and the implanted femoral component of the implanted PFR had the same radius, inclination relative to the femoral mechanical axis, antero-posterior position and medio-lateral orientation. As intended by the designers the groove of the patellar component extended about 13mm further superiorly and 0.5mm more inferiorly. Discussion. The patella groove on the femoral component of the PFR reproduces the natural trochlear anatomy well. Patella tracking in the PFR-P shows only minor differences compared to the natural knee. Resurfacing of the patella in the PFR+P group causes the patella to tilt a little more laterally and track a little more medially, the distance to the epicondylar axis is slightly larger but this allows the patella to engage better in the patellar groove of the femoral component

Introduction: Patellar complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain a common reason for failure. Fully congruent patellar components, with larger contact areas and a polyethylene articular surface that is free to rotate in the frontal plane (LCS design), were designed to accommodate patellar mechanics and decrease wear. However, it remains to be determined whether the perceived advantages of a mobile-bearing, fully congruent patella design are realized in-vivo. The purpose of this study is correlate wear patterns on congruent mobile-bearing patellar components with patellar mechanics that existed after TKA. Methods: Uncemented metal-backed patellar components were retrieved at revision surgery from 26 knees with meniscal bearing (23 knees) and rotating platform (3 knees) LCS mobile bearing prostheses (DePuy Orthopaedics). Mean patient age and time in-situ was 75+11 years and 11+4 years, respectively. Revision reasons included bearing wear (11), patella wear (7), instability (2), pain (3), loosening (1), osteolysis (1), and unknown (1). Polyethylene damage was assessed using optical microscopy. Articular wear area was measured using digital image analysis and the % area, location and incidence of each damage mode was calculated. Results: The average damage area on the retrieved patella occupied 69%+15% of the surface. Burnishing, delamination and scratching modes occupied the largest areas. Delamination was noted on 58% of the retrieved patellae, predominantly located in the superior-medial quadrant. Nine (35%) patellae were fractured, with the fracture plane typically oriented in the medial-lateral direction or along the lateral edge. Twently one (81%) patellae had subsurface cracks oriented along the superior-inferior axis on the extreme lateral edge and along the medial-lateral axis. None of the patellae had embedded third body debris, but the embedded superior metal pin was exposed due to extreme damage in 4 patellas. The original femoral and tibial components were left in-situ in all knees at the time of revision, such that only the polyethylene tibial and patellar articulations were exchanged. Discussion: Despite severe wear of the components, there was only a 5% incidence of osteolysis noted intra-operatively. Cyclic compressive and tensile forces during knee flexion likely caused initiation and propagation of cracks resulting in patellar bearing fracture. The delami-nation patterns on the retrieved patellae are consistent with bearing rotation into an incongruent bearing position during knee flexion, with presumably high contact stresses occurring in the delaminated superior-medial quadrant. Fully congruent mobile-bearing patella components must maintain mobility between the articular surface and metal back so that areas of incongruent contact, and associated high contact stresses and delamination, do not occur during in-vivo function

The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement consists of a trochlear component and a modular patellar component which has a metal-backed mobile polyethylene bearing. We present the early results of the use of this prosthesis for established isolated patellofemoral arthritis in 51 consecutive patellofemoral replacements in 35 patients. The mean follow-up was 25 months (5 to 60). The estimated survival rate at three years was 63% (95% confidence interval 47 to 80) with revision as the endpoint and 46% (95% confidence interval 30 to 63) with revision and ongoing moderate or severe pain as the endpoint. The early results of the use of the low contact stress patellofemoral replacement are disappointing with a high rate of revision. We cannot therefore recommend its use

There is no question that at some point many TKAs will be cementless-the question is when. The advantages of cementless TKA include a shorter operative time, no need for a tourniquet, more suitability for MIS, no concern for cement extrusion, and the history of THA. The concerns for cementless TKA include the history to date with cementless TKA (tibia and metal-backed patella), variable bony substrate, surgical cut precision, cost, revision concerns, and the patella (for patella component resurfacers). Cemented total knee arthroplasty remains the gold standard and has proven to provide durable results in most patients. The early experience with cementless tibial fixation was problematic due to tibial micromotion leading to pain and loosening. Screw fixed tibial components had additional problems as portals for polyethylene debris leading to tibial osteolysis. Moreover, metal-backed patellar components were associated with a high failure rate and most surgeons began to cement all three components. Renewed interest in cementless tibial fixation is driven in part by newer materials felt to be more suitable for ingrowth and by the perceived benefit of minimally invasive surgery. One of the concerns in limited exposure total knee arthroplasty is the difficulty in preventing the extravasation of cement posteriorly. If there is evidence-based data that quad sparing non-patella everting and limited incision length facilitates rehabilitation and does not jeopardise outcome, cementless tibial fixation will be a more attractive option in some patients. An additional concern is that the tibial surface is frequently quite variable in terms of the strength of the cancellous bone. Bone cement stabilises those differences and provides a homogeneous platform for load bearing through the tibial component

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful operation associated with a high rate of clinical success and long-term durability. Cementless technology for TKA was first explored 30 years ago with the hope of simplifying the performance of the procedure and reducing an interface for potential failure by eliminating the use of cement. Poor implant design and the use of first generation biomaterials have been implicated in many early failures of these prostheses due to aseptic loosening and reflected the failure of either the tibial or patellar component. Despite this, many excellent intermediate and long-term series have clearly demonstrated the ability of cementless TKA to perform well with good to excellent survival, comparable to that of cemented designs. Lessons learned from the initial experiences with cementless technology in TKA have led to improvements in prosthetic design and materials development. One of the most innovative biomaterials introduced into orthopaedics for cementless fixation is porous tantalum. Compared to other commonly used materials for cementless fixation, porous tantalum has the highest surface friction against bone, optimizing initial stability at the implant-bone interface as a prerequisite for long-term stability of the reconstruction. At the 2013 AAOS Annual Meeting, Abdel presented the 5-year Mayo Clinic experience with cementless TKA utilizing a highly porous monoblock tibial component in 117 knees and found NO difference in survivorship compared to cemented fixation with a re-operation rate of 3.5% in both groups. They had no revisions for aseptic loosening. These early to intermediate results reflect our own experience with all cementless TKA utilizing a cobalt-chromium fibermesh femoral component, as well as monoblock porous tantalum tibial and patellar components with up to 11-year follow up. In that series of 115 patients, there was a 95.7% survival of implants, with no revisions of any components for aseptic loosening. Further advantages to using cementless fixation include the elimination of concerns with regard to monomer-induced hypotension, thermal necrosis from PMMA polymerization, and third body wear secondary to retained or fragmented cement. Savings are also realised from elimination of the costs of cement, a PMMA mixing system, cement gun, pulse lavage system, and irrigation solution. Perhaps the greatest cost savings is derived from the reduction in operating room time. At our institution–a Level 1 county trauma center with an orthopaedic residency training program–we typically spend an average of 19 minutes of operating room time for the cementing of a total knee arthroplasty. Our average time expended for insertion of all three cementless implants is 47 seconds–representing a significant savings in the hospital operating room time charge. From the standpoint of the patient, the shorter operating time reduces the time under anesthesia, the blood loss, the risk of venous thromboembolism, as well as the infection risk–optimizing the conditions for a reduction in post-operative complications, directly impacting a potential reduction in morbidity and mortality. Overall, the performance of all cementless TKA at our facility is cost-saving, is easily performed and reproduced by orthopaedic residents, and brings potential advantages to the patient in the form of a reduction in complications and an improvement in outcomes. Cementless fixation is the wave of the future, and the future is now

Complications involving the patellofemoral joint, caused by malrotation of the femoral component during total knee replacement, are an important cause of persistent pain and failure leading to revision surgery. The aim of this study was to determine and quantify the influence of femoral component malrotation on patellofemoral wear, and to determine whether or not there is a difference in the rate of wear of the patellar component when articulated against oxidised zirconium (OxZr) and cobalt-chrome (CoCr) components. An in vitro method was used to simulate patellar maltracking for both materials. Both rates of wear and changes in height on the patellar articular surface were measured. The mean rates of wear measured were very small compared to standard tibiofemoral wear rates. When data for each femoral component material were pooled, the mean rate of wear was 0.19 mm. 3. /Mcycle (. sd. 0.21) for OxZr and 0.34 mm. 3. /Mcycle (. sd. 0.335) for CoCr. The largest change in height on each patella varied from -0.05 mm to -0.33 mm over the different configurations. The results suggest that patellar maltracking due to an internally rotated femoral component leads to an increased mean patellar wear. Although not statistically significant, the mean wear production may be lower for OxZr than for CoCr components

General Principles. All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion. Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6 to 8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex mesh can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture. End-to-end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture. These can be repaired end-to-end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture. Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag, non-operative treatment in extension. A loose component and/or > 20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions. While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevents a “tension-free” repair. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate. In chronic disruptions with loss of the patella, allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction may be considered. Marlex mesh repair has also been shown to be effective in reconstruction of chronic patellar and quadriceps tendon defects

Background. Multiple retrospective studies have compared UC with traditional bearings and shown comparable results and outcomes when looking at clinical and radiologic variables, complications rates, and implant survivorship; however, debate still exists regarding the optimum bearing surface. The present study seeks to determine whether there are any preoperative patient demographic or medical factors or anatomic variables including femoral condylar offset and tibial slope that may predict use of a UC bearing when compared to a standard CR group. Methods. The study cohort consisted of 117 patients (41 males, 76 females) who underwent primary TKA with the senior author. The implants utilized were either the CR or UC polyethylene components of the Zimmer Persona Total Knee System. Insert selection was based on intraoperative assessment of PCL integrity and soft tissue balancing. Patient demographics (age, gender, BMI) and co-morbidities (hypertension, diabetes, depression, cardiac disease, and lung disease) were recorded. Intraoperative variables of interest included extension and flexion range of motion, estimated blood loss (EBL), tourniquet time, and polyethylene and femoral component sizes. We calculated change in tibial slope and femoral condylar offset from pre- to post-surgery and computed the percentage of patients for whom an increase in tibial slope or femoral condylar offset was determined. Postoperative variables, including length of stay, complication rates and reoperation rates, were recorded. All dependent variables were compared between patients who received the UC component and patients who received the CR component. Continuous variables were assessed using independent samples t-tests, while categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test of independence. Results. There were 39 patients who received a UC insert and 78 patients who received CR insert. Patient age (p = 0.58), BMI (p = 0.34), or sex distribution (p = 0.84) did not differ between the UC and CR groups. Mean LOS (3.59 vs. 3.08; p = 0.017), EBL (54.5 vs. 46.7; p=0.021), and tourniquet time (61.2 vs. 57.4; p=0.032) were greater for the UC group. Intraoperative implant variables, including polyethylene component (p = 0.49), femoral component (p = 0.56), use of a narrow femoral component (p = 0.85), and patellar component size (p = 0,83), were similar between groups. Additionally, preoperative (p = 0.46) and postoperative (p = 0.19) condylar offset and preoperative (p = 0.66) and postoperative (p = 0.23) tibial slope were not different between the groups. However, the proportion of patients for whom tibial slope increased postoperatively was greater for the UC group compared to the CR group (43.6 vs. 21.8% respectively, p=0.018). Conclusions. Our results showed that no preoperative medical co-morbidities or demographic factors predicted use of the UC bearing; however, postoperative tibial slope was increased for a greater number of patients who received the UC implant. Patients who have an increase in their slope from their native anatomy during tibial preparation may require additional balancing of the flexion gap, and use of a UC component may be beneficial in this particular group of patients

A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing primary cementless total knee replacement (TKR) using porous tantalum performed by a group of surgical trainees. Clinical and radiological follow-up involved 79 females and 26 males encompassing 115 knees. The mean age was 66.9 years (36 to 85). Mean follow-up was 7 years (2 to 11). Tibial and patellar components were porous tantalum monoblock implants, and femoral components were posterior stabilised (PS) in design with cobalt–chromium fibre mesh. Radiological assessments were made for implant positioning, alignment, radiolucencies, lysis, and loosening. There was 95.7% survival of implants. There was no radiological evidence of loosening and no osteolysis found. No revisions were performed for aseptic loosening. Average tibial component alignment was 1.4° of varus (4°of valgus to 9° varus), and 6.2° (3° anterior to 15° posterior) of posterior slope. Mean femoral component alignment was 6.6° (1° to 11°) of valgus. Mean tibiofemoral alignment was 5.6° of valgus (7° varus to 16° valgus). Patellar tilt was a mean of 2.4° lateral (5° medial to 28° lateral). Patient satisfaction with improvement in pain was 91%. Cementless TKR incorporating porous tantalum yielded good clinical and radiological outcomes at a mean of follow-up of seven-years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):87–92

Introduction. Patellar resurfacing during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. Problems unique to patellar resurfacing may be influenced by available patellar component design. These issues include; over-stuffing (the creation of a composite patellar-prosthesis thickness greater than the native patella) that may contribute to reduced range of motion; and over-resection of the native patellar bone that may contribute to post-operative fracture. Prosthesis design may play a role in contributing to these problems. Component diameter and thickness are quite variable from one manufacturer to another and little information has been previously published about optimal component dimensions. This anatomic study was performed to define the native patellar anatomy of patients undergoing TKA, in order to guide future component design. Methods. This retrospective, IRB approved study reviewed 797 Caucasian knees that underwent primary TKA by a single surgeon. Data recorded for each patient included: gender; patellar thickness before and after resurfacing, and the size of the component that provided the greatest patellar coverage without any overhang. The residual patellar bone thickness after resection was also calculated. Results. Mean (SD) native patellar thickness was 25.24 mm (2.11) in males, versus 22.13 mm (1.89) in females (P = <0.001). 84 of 483 females (17 %) had a native patellar thickness less than or equal to 20 mm. Only 3 male patients had a native patellar thickness less than or equal to 20 mm (1%). 374 females (78%) could only accommodate a round patellar button less than or equal to 32 mm. Conclusions. These findings suggest that patellar component design can be improved for Caucasian female patients. Round components between 26 and 32 mm that measure no more than 7 mm thick would be required to avoid systematic over-stuffing or over-resection of the native patellar in female patients. Most contemporary knee systems do not meet these needs

Implant selection in TKA remains highly variable. Surgeons consider pre-operative deformity, patient factors such as BMI and bone quality, surgical experience, retention or substitution for the PCL, type of articulation and polyethylene, cost, and fixation with or without cement. We have most frequently implanted the same implant for the majority of patients. This is based on the fact that multiple large series of TKAs have demonstrated that the most durable TKAs have been non-modular metal-backed tibial components, retention of the PCL, with a cemented all-polyethylene patellar component. Polymer wear must be addressed for long-term durability. One method for reducing polyethylene wear is eliminating modularity between a metal-backed tray and the articular bearing surface. This can be done with a metal-backed implant as with the IB-1, AGC, Vanguard Mono-lock, or with elimination of the metal backing via a one piece all-polyethylene tibial component. The all-polyethylene implants appear design and patient sensitive. We observed higher clinical failure rates in a flat-on-flat design. Other authors have observed improved survivorship with coronal dishing of the articular surfaces which centralises osseous stresses. All-polyethylene implants have promise in the future but require proven design and fixation design features

We analysed at a mean follow-up of 7.25 years the clinical and radiological outcome of 117 patients (125 knees) who had undergone a primary, cemented, modular Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement. While the tibial and femoral components were cemented, the patellar component was uncemented. A surface-cementing technique was used to secure the tibial components. A total of 82 knees was available for radiological assessment. Radiolucent lines were seen in 41 knees (50%) and osteolytic lesions were seen in 13 knees (16%). Asymptomatic, rotational loosening of the patellar implant was seen in four patients and osteolysis was more common in patients with a patellar resurfacing. Functional outcome scores were available for 41 patients (41 knees, 35%) and the mean Western Ontario McMasters Universities score was 77.5 (. sd. 19.5) and the cumulative survival was 93.4% at ten years with revision for aseptic loosening as an endpoint. Increased polyethylene wear from modular components, a rotationally-loose patella, and the surface-cementing technique may have contributed to the high rate of osteolysis seen in our study

Introduction: Patellar crepitus (PC) has been reported in 13% of cruciatesubstituting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients resulting from synovial tissue impingement within the femoral component intercondylar box (IB). Patient factors, component design, and technical errors have been implicated in PC. We compared primary TKA patients with PC requiring surgery against matched controls to identify significant variables. Methods: The databases of 2 institutions were reviewed to identify patients requiring surgery for PC. A control group matched for age, sex, and BMI was identified. Patient charts and radiographs were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed. Significant variables associated with patient anatomy, implant size and alignment were subsequently investigated in a computational model to evaluate tendofemoral contact. Results: Between 2002 and 2008, over 4000 primary TKAs were performed using the Press Fit Condylar Sigma (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana) TKA. Of these, 59 knees developed PC requiring surgery. The mean time to presentation was 10.9 months. The incidence of PC correlated with greater number of previous surgeries (1.18 vs. 0.44, p= 0.002), decreased patellar button size (35.7 vs. 37.1mm, p=0.003), shorter patellar tendon length (54.5 vs. 57.9mm, p=0.01), and increase in posterior femoral condylar offset (1.27mm vs. 0.17mm, p=0.022). Using a patellar component of 32 or 35mm significantly increased the risk of PC compared to the use of a 38 or 41mm component (p< 0.01, RR=1.61, OR 2.63). Modeling results demonstrated decreased patellar tendon length created increased tendofemoral contact near the IB, while larger buttons increased separation between the tendon and the box edge. Conclusion: Shortened patellar tendon length and use of smaller patellar components may expose the quadriceps tendon to increased irritation as it traverses across the femoral component IB. Increasing posterior femoral offset may increase quadriceps tendon tension, further risking synovial tissue impingement within the IB

Success in knee revision begins in the office. The initial evaluations determine the implant design and pre-operative diagnosis. The physical examination identifies the presence of instability, stiffness, extensor mechanism malfunction and previous incisions all of which influence the planned procedure. Prior to surgery arrangements are made to have all manner of revision implants, removal tools, and allograft material available. Removal of implants must be done with a focus on preserving bone stock and the extensor mechanism. Initial exposure involves release of the gutters, lateral subluxation of the patella and removal of the polyethylene insert. These maneuvers combined with a quadriceps snip provide exposure for implant removal in 80–90% of cases. More extensive exposure options include quadriceps turndown, tibial tubercle osteotomy, medial epicondylar osteotomy and a femoral peel. Tools needed for implant removal include thin osteotomes, offset osteotomes, thin saws and a high-speed bur. After polyethylene removal the femur followed by the tibia are removed. In many cases the existing well-fixed patellar component can remain. The implant cement or implant bone interface is approached for cemented and cementless implants, respectively. Tools are always directed parallel to the fixation surface. Offset osteotomes are helpful gaining access to the femoral notch when femoral pegs prevent access from the sides. Central keels or peripheral pegs can complicate tibial removal. Working completely around the keel from medial and lateral disrupts the peripheral tibial interface leaving just the central posterior metaphysis. Stacked osteotomes or a slap hammer can be used to lift the baseplate from the tibia

We report the incidence of osteolysis in the femur, tibia, and patella of 44 consecutive patients (60 knees) who were followed for more than seven years after cementless knee arthroplasty with a Porous-Coated Anatomic prosthesis. The average age of the patients was 56.5 years (17 to 73); the operative diagnosis was osteoarthritis (33 knees), rheumatoid arthritis (17), tuberculous arthritis (7) and post-traumatic arthritis (3). All patellae were resurfaced. No femoral or tibial component was loose at the final follow-up examination. Thirty patellar components were loose of which six had been revised. Radiographs revealed osteolysis in 90% of the tibial plateaux and in 80% of the 30 intact patellar prostheses. No osteolysis was seen around any femoral component. In 50 knees (83%) the average wear of the polyethylene liner was 2.5 mm in the medial compartment and 1.7 mm in the lateral compartment. Four of 60 knees (6.7%) were revised for complete wear of the polyethylene liner of the tibial component. Fixation of the tibial and patellar components without cement fails to seal the interface between bone and prosthesis and allows the migration of polyethylene particulate debris which causes osteolysis

General Principles: All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex Mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion: Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6 to 8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture: End-to-end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture: These can be repaired end-to-end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture: Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag, non-operative treatment in extension. A loose component and/or > 20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions: While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevents a “tension-free” repair. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate. In chronic disruptions with loss of the patella, allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction may be considered. Marlex mesh repair has also been shown to be effective in reconstruction of chronic patellar and quadriceps tendon defects

The August 2023 Knee Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Curettage and cementation of giant cell tumour of bone: is arthritis a given?; Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty: does the patellar cement-bone interface affect postoperative anterior knee pain?; Nickel allergy and total knee arthroplasty; The use of artificial intelligence for the prediction of periprosthetic joint infection following aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty; Ambulatory unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development of a patient selection tool using machine learning; Femoral asymmetry: a missing piece in knee alignment; Needle arthroscopy – a benefit to patients in the outpatient setting; Can lateral unicompartmental knees be done in a day-case setting?

Aims

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a technically challenging and costly procedure. It is well-documented that primary TKA (pTKA) have better survivorship than rTKA; however, we were unable to identify any studies explicitly investigating previous rTKA as a risk factor for failure following rTKA. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes following rTKA between patients undergoing index rTKA and those who had been previously revised.

Introduction. Tibial tuberosity and trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance has been investigated for the patients with primary patellofemoral subluxation/dislocation. To date, TT-TG distance after TKA has not been evaluated, and the effect of postoperative TT-TG distance on patellar tracking is unknown. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of TT-TG distance and rotational position of the femoral and tibial components on patellar tilt after TKA. Methods. Consecutive 115 knees for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis were included in the current study. TKA was performed using posterior cruciate ligament sacrificed prosthesis. A total of 17 men and 96 women with an average age of 75.3 years were included at the time of the surgery. Computed tomography (CT) was taken after TKA in full extension. Postoperative TT-TG distance was measured as a reference of surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) of the femur. Patellar tilt was defined as the angle of the patellar component relative to SEA. Femoral and tibial component rotation was measured as the angle relative to SEA and tibial antero-posterior (AP) axis. Tibial AP axis was defined as the line connecting medial one-third of the tibial tuberosity and center of medial-lateral width. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlations between patellar tilt and TT-TG distance and between patellar tilt and femoral and tibial component rotation. Results. TT-TG distance had significant correlation with patellar tilt (Figure 1; r = 0.254, p = 0.006), whereas femoral component rotation (p = 0.092) and tibial component rotation (p = 0.062) were not correlated with patellar tilt. Concerning the effect on TT-TG distance, femoral component rotation (r = 0.248, p = 0.008) and tibial component rotation (r = −0.567, p < 0.001) were correlated with TT-TG distance. Conclusion. The current study investigated the effect of TT-TG distance on patellar tilt with postoperative CT scan. Greater TT-TG distance resulted in more patellar tilt, which might have negative effects on patellar tracking. In previous clinical studies, femoral component and tibial component rotation affected patellar maltracking. In the current study, however, component rotation itself did not affect patellar tilt. Postoperative TT-TG distance includes information of rotational and medial-lateral positioning of the femoral and tibial components, and can be a useful indicator to predict patellar maltracking after TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The battle of revision TKA is won or lost with safe, effective, and minimally bony-destructive implant removal, protecting all ligamentous stabilisers of the knee and, most importantly, the extensor mechanism. For exposure, incisions should be long and generous to allow adequate access. A standard medial parapatellar capsular arthrotomy is preferred. A synovectomy is performed followed by debridement of all scar tissue, especially in the medial and lateral gutters. All peripatellar scar tissue is excised followed by release of scar tissue within the patellar tendon, allowing for displacement or everting of the patella. As patellar tendon avulsion at any time of knee surgery yields disastrous results, the surgeon should be continuously evaluating the patellar tendon integrity, especially while displacing/everting the patella and bringing the knee into flexion. If displacement/eversion is difficult, consider rectis-snip, V-Y quadricepsplasty, or tibial tubercle osteotomy. The long-held requisite for patellar eversion prior to component removal is inaccurate. In most cases simple lateral patellar subluxation will provide adequate exposure. If a modular tibial system is involved, removal of the tibial polyethylene will decompress the knee, allowing for easier access to patellar, femoral, and tibial components. For patellar component removal, first identify the border of the patella, then carefully clean and debride the interface, preferably with electrocautery. If the tibial component is cemented all-polyethylene, remove using an oscillating saw at the prosthetic-bone interface. Debride the remaining cement with hand tools, ultrasonic tools, or burrs. Remove the remaining peg using a low-speed burr. If the tibial component is metal-backed, then utilise a thin saw blade or reciprocating saw to negotiate the undersurface of the component between the pegs. If pegs are peripherally located, cut with a diamond disc circular cutting tool. Use a trephine to remove the pegs. For femoral component removal, identify the prosthetic-bone/prosthetic-cement interface then remove soft tissue from the interface, preferably with electrocautery. Disrupt the interface around all aspects of the component, using any of following: Gigli saw for cementless components only, micro saw, standard oscillating saw, reciprocating saw, a series of thin osteotomes, or ultrasonic equipment. If the femoral component is stemmed, remove the component in two segments using an appropriate screwdriver to remove the screw locking the stem to the component. Remove the femoral component with a retrodriver or femoral component extractor. Debride cement with hand tools or burr, using care to avoid bone fracture. If a stem is present, then remove with the appropriate extraction device. If “mismatch” exists, where femoral (or likewise, tibial) boss is smaller in diameter than the stem, creating a cement block prohibiting stem removal, remove the cement with hand tools or burr. If the stem is cemented, use hand tools, ultrasonic tools, or a burr to debride the cement. Curette and clean the canals. For tibial component removal, disrupt the prosthetic-cement/prosthetic-bone interface using an oscillating or reciprocating saw. Gently remove the tibial component with a retrodriver or tibial extractor. If stem extensions are utilised, disengage and debride all proximal cement prior to removing the stem. If stem is present, then remove stem with appropriate extraction device. If stem is grit-blasted and well-fixed, create 8mm burr holes 1.5 to 2.5cm distal to tibial tray on medial aspect and a small divot using burr, then drive implant proximally with Anspach punch. Alternatively, a tibial tubercle osteotomy may be performed. If the stem is cemented, use hand tools, ultrasonic tools or burr to debride cement

Avoidance of extensor mechanism complications is best obtained by using components with an appropriately designed femoral trochlea and patellar component and where internally rotated components are avoided. Residual valgus deformity may also lead to patellar dislocation or more subtle subluxations, which may manifest as pain along the medial patellar retinaculum. Because rotational abnormalities are difficult to detect on plain x-ray, CT scans are a useful way to diagnose this problem. Peripatellar crepitation may cause symptoms and can be avoided by aggressive peripatellar synovectomy at the time of surgery. In its most severe form, the patellar clunk syndrome, most commonly seen in posterior stabilised knees, arthroscopic debridement of the offending fibrous nodule may be needed. Patellar fracture is best treated on the basis of residual extensor mechanism function. Maintenance of active extension following fracture (with no loss of component fixation) is a good sign that conservative therapy will yield better function than ORIF. Loss of extension indicates that surgery will be required. In this setting restoration of extensor continuity is more important than retention of the patellar component. Patellar tendon avulsion can be avoided by careful attention to the tendon during surgical exposure. Intraoperative repair alone is rarely successful and should be reinforced by semitendonosis, or fascia lata grafting. Late rupture may be treated by this type of grafting alone. But if the patella is necrotic or the failure results in a high riding patella, mechanism transplant is preferred. In this setting attention to fixing the graft in full extension is mandatory to prevent severe extensor lag, as the allograft will stretch out overtime

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum follow-up of ten years of patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty with an inset patellar component. The incidence of anterior knee pain and the factors which may contribute to were also studied. Method: Patients who had genesis I/II TKA with an inset patellar button with a minimum follow-up of 10 years were identified. 448 patients with 521 knees were identified. Patients were excluded if they were deceased, had incomplete data, were unable to be contacted or had a known or impending revision. Those who had revision were included in a Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis. The included patients, deceased patients and those lost to follow-up were named group1, 2, and 3 respectively. Demographics and Knee society scores(KSS) were studies for all 3 groups. This was to identify any exclusion bias. Presence and severity of anterior knee pain as well as radiographic factors were collected for group 3. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify and variables that influenced the KSS and presence of anterior knee pain. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed for patellar revision and tibial/femoral revision endpoints. Results: 144 patients with 175 TKA were included in this study. They were on average 66 years old, 64% female, had a BMI of 30 and had a diagnosis of OA 92% of the time. Their average f/u was 11.3 years. Groups 2 and 3 had similar demographics but of course a much shorter f/u. Group 1 had a pre-op KSS of 84 a post-op KSS of 151 and a KS change score of 67. Groups 2 and 3 had similar pre-op, post-op and KSS change scores. We found anterior knee pain occurred in 5% of patients with an average severity of 5/10. Linear regression analysis did not identify any variables including radiographic parameters that had an independent influence on KSS or anterior knee pain. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with patellar revision for any reason as an endpoint was 96% at 10 years and 94% at 17 years. 20 patella were known to have had a revision or were undergoing a revision. Conclusion: We conclude that use of an inset patellar component can give excellent durable results over time with a low rate of anterior knee pain and complications

Introduction: The aim of introducing mobile-bearing knee replacements was to improve long term survival by maintaining large areas of surface contact, while allowing motion to occur at the bearing-metal interface on the tibial and patellar components. Despite wide use of these implants, there are only a few intermediate or long-term follow-up studies. Aims: To present the intermediate follow-up results of a cementless, posterior cruciate ligament retaining, low contact-stress, knee replacement system (LCS). Methods: Between 1987 and 1991 the senior author (U.W.) performed 134 cementless LCS total knee arthroplasties in 121 patients. Twenty of the patients were male, 101 female, with an average age of 70 years (range: 49 years to 91years). In 40% of the cases the patella was resurfaced. The patients were evaluated with clinical knee rating (Insall score) and radiographic analysis, between six and nine years postoperatively. Results: At the time of the follow-up 94 patients were alive. Twelve patients (10%; 14 prostheses) were contacted by phone after an average of 77 months. Evaluation was possible in 82 patients (68%; 91 prostheses) after an average of 74 months. Ninety percent of these patients had an Insall score of > 80 (good to very good). One patient had a score of < 70 (insufficient). Average flexion was 114 degrees (range: of 70 to 135 degrees). Two patients had flexion of < 90 degrees. There were no radiographic signs of aseptic loosening. The meniscal bearing of four prostheses and one patellar component were replaced. Complications like haematoma, fibrotic arthritis and infection due to endocarditis lenta lead to three revisions. Conclusion: Our study has shown that the non-cemented posterior cruciate ligament retaining LCS knee replacement system produced very satisfactory results with few complications in the medium term

Introduction: Although the problems of patello-femoral kinematics in contemporary total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial, meticulous surgical technique is pivotal in providing optimal and durable function. The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence of lateral release comparing fixed and mobile bearing posterior stabilized modular press-fit condylar TKA’s with patellar resurfacing. Materials and methods: Cohort 1 comprised 100 consecutive cemented Press-Fit Condylar Sigma, (Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, Massachusetts) modular total knee prostheses with a posterior cruciate substituting design and dome shaped single peg patellar component implanted prospectively by a single surgeon. Cohort 2 comprised 100 consecutive cemented Press-Fit Rotating Platform Sigma (Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, Massachusetts) modular total knee prostheses with the same posterior cruciate substituting design and patellar component. The surgical technique comprised cutting the tibial surface perpendicular to the long axis, ligament balancing in extension followed by femoral component rotation referenced off the proximal tibial cut to produce a rectangular flexion gap. The patella was cut to the level of the lateral facet and tibial component rotation was referenced off the center of the ankle. Lateral release was performed if congruent patello-femoral contact was not attained in knee flexion. Clinical and radiographic review was performed as per Knee Society criteria. Additional radiographic evaluation included patellar displacement, tilt, residual bone thickness and coverage ratio. A patient-administered questionnaire was used to evaluate anterior knee pain and patello-femoral function 1 year after surgery. Results: The incidence of lateral release in the fixed-bearing cohort was 10% 1 compared to 0% in the mobile bearing cohort (p< 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of clinical or radiographic parameters at short term. Discussion: This study demonstrates the benefit of self-correction of tibiofemoral rotational mismatch with mobile bearing TKA’s and improvement in patello-femoral tracking. Longer follow-up is necessary to confirm the effect on patello-femoral wear, fixation and durability

A series of 100 consecutive osteoarthritic patients was randomised to undergo total knee replacement using a Miller-Galante II prosthesis, with or without a cemented polyethylene patellar component. Knee function was evaluated using the American Knee Society score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index, specific patellofemoral-related questions and radiographic evaluation until the fourth post-operative year, then via questionnaire until ten years post-operatively. A ten-point difference in the American Knee Society score between the two groups was considered a significant change in knee performance, with α and β levels of 0.05. The mean age of the patients in the resurfaced group was 71 years (53 to 88) and in the non-resurfaced group was 73 years (54 to 86). After ten years 22 patients had died, seven were suffering from dementia, three declined further participation and ten were lost to follow-up. Two patients in the non-resurfaced group subsequently had their patellae resurfaced. In the resurfaced group one patient had an arthroscopic lateral release. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups: both had a similar deterioration of scores with time, and no further patellofemoral complications were observed in either group. We are unable to recommend routine patellar resurfacing in osteoarthritic patients undergoing total knee replacement on the basis of our findings

Extensor mechanism complications after or during total knee arthroplasty are problematic. The prevalence ranges from 1–12% in TKR patients. Treatment results for these problems are inferior to the results of similar problems in non-TKR patients. Furthermore, the treatment algorithm is fundamentally different from that of non-TKR patients. The surgeon's first question does not focus on primary fixation; rather the surgeon must ask if the patient needs surgery and if so am I prepared to augment the repair? Quadriceps tendon rupture, periprosthetic patellar fracture, and patellar tendon rupture have similar treatment algorithms. Patients who are able to perform a straight leg raise and have less than a 20-degree extensor lag are generally treated non-operatively with extension bracing. The remaining patients will need surgical reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. Loose patellar components are removed. Primary repair alone is associated with poor results. Whole extensor mechanism allograft, Achilles tendon allograft, and synthetic mesh reconstruction are the current techniques for augmentation. In the acute setting if these are not available hamstring tendon harvest and augmentation is an option. Achilles tendons and synthetic mesh are easier to obtain than and entire extensor mechanism but are limited to patients that have an intact patella and the patella that can be mobilised to within 2–3 cm of the joint line. No matter which technique is used the principles are: rigid distal/tubercle fixation, coverage of allograft/mesh with host tissue to decrease infection, tensioning the augment material in extension, no flexion testing of reconstruction and post-operative extension bracing

Aims

We have previously reported the mid-term outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for flexion instability. At a mean of four years, there were no re-revisions for instability. The aim of this study was to report the implant survivorship and clinical and radiological outcomes of the same cohort of of patients at a mean follow-up of ten years.

Advanced 3D imaging and CT-based navigation have emerged as valuable tools to use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), for both preoperative planning and the intraoperative execution of different philosophies of alignment. Preoperative planning using CT-based 3D imaging enables more accurate prediction of the size of components, enhancing surgical workflow and optimizing the precision of the positioning of components. Surgeons can assess alignment, osteophytes, and arthritic changes better. These scans provide improved insights into the patellofemoral joint and facilitate tibial sizing and the evaluation of implant-bone contact area in cementless TKA. Preoperative CT imaging is also required for the development of patient-specific instrumentation cutting guides, aiming to reduce intraoperative blood loss and improve the surgical technique in complex cases. Intraoperative CT-based navigation and haptic guidance facilitates precise execution of the preoperative plan, aiming for optimal positioning of the components and accurate alignment, as determined by the surgeon’s philosophy. It also helps reduce iatrogenic injury to the periarticular soft-tissue structures with subsequent reduction in the local and systemic inflammatory response, enhancing early outcomes. Despite the increased costs and radiation exposure associated with CT-based navigation, these many benefits have facilitated the adoption of imaged based robotic surgery into routine practice. Further research on ultra-low-dose CT scans and exploration of the possible translation of the use of 3D imaging into improved clinical outcomes are required to justify its broader implementation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):892–897.

General Principles - All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex Mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute Tibial Tuberosity Avulsion - Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6 to 8 weeks of immobilisation. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture - End-to-end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture - These can be repaired end to end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture - Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag. A loose component and/or >20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions - While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevent a “tension-free” repair. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate while in any patellar tendon defect, mesh repair has been shown to be effective. In most chronic disruptions with loss of the patella allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction may be considered

Implant selection in TKA remains highly variable. Surgeons consider preoperative deformity, surgical experience, retention or substitution for the PCL, type of articulation and polyethylene, and fixation with or without cement. We have most frequently implanted the same implant for the majority of patients. This is based on the fact that multiple large series of TKA's have demonstrated that the most durable TKA's have been non-modular metal backed tibial components, retention of the PCL, with a cemented all poly patellar component. The debate of how to handle the PCL continues. In most studies at 10 years there is little reported difference. Second decade concerns usually result from polyethylene issues related to polymer wear. Sagittal “dishing” or ultracongruent implants may be a middle road that allow PCL release or resection and controlled kinematics offering improved short term results. Long term function remains the goal and it appears a CR knee offers that capacity. Newer implants such as “high flex” and “gender” specific designs have not demonstrated significant functional improvements in controlled series. Uncemented knees in many series have performed well for many surgeons from a fixation standpoint. Polymer wear must be addressed for long term durability

Aims

A novel enhanced cement fixation (EF) tibial implant with deeper cement pockets and a more roughened bonding surface was released to market for an existing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system.This randomized controlled trial assessed fixation of the both the EF (ATTUNE S+) and standard (Std; ATTUNE S) using radiostereometric analysis.

Aims

The primary objective of this registry-based study was to compare patient-reported outcomes of cementless and cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during the first postoperative year. The secondary objective was to assess one- and three-year implant survival of both fixation techniques.

“The shortest distance between two points is a straight line.” This explains many cases of patellar maltracking, when the patellar track is visualised in three dimensions. The three-dimensional view means that rotation of the tibia and femur during flexion and extension, as well as rotational positioning of the tibial and femoral components are extremely important. As the extensor is loaded, the patella tends to “center” itself between the patellar tendon and the quadriceps muscle. The patella is most likely to track in the trochlear groove IF THE GROOVE is situated where the patella is driven by the extensor mechanism: along the shortest track from origin to insertion. Attempts to constrain the patella in the trochlear groove, if it lies outside that track, are usually unsuccessful. Physiologic mechanisms for tibial-femoral rotation that benefit patellar tracking (“screw home” and “asymmetric femoral roll-back”) are not generally reproduced. Practical Point. A patellofemoral radiograph that shows the tibial tubercle, illustrates how the tubercle, and with it the patellar tendon and patella itself, are all in line with the femoral trochlea. To accomplish this with a TKA, the femoral component is best rotated to the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and the tibial component to the tubercle. In this way, when the femoral component sits in its designated location on the tibial polyethylene, the trochlear groove will be ideally situated to “receive” the patella. Knee Mechanics. Six “degrees of freedom” refers to translation and rotation on three axes (x,y,z). This also describes how arthroplasty components can be positioned at surgery. The significant positions of tibial, femoral and patellar components are: 1. Internal-external rotation (around y-axis) and 2. Varus-valgus rotation (around z axis). 3. Medial-lateral translation (on x-axis). The other positional variables are less important for patella tracking. Biomechanical analyses of knee function are often broken down into: i. Extensor power analysis (y-z or sagittal plane) and ii. Tracking (x-y or frontal plane). These must be integrated to include the effects of rotation and to better understand patellar tracking. Effect of Valgus. Frontal plane alignment is important but less likely to reach pathological significance for patellar tracking than rotational malposition clinically. For example if a typical tibia is cut in 5 degrees of unintended mechanical valgus, this will displace the foot about 5 cm laterally but the tibial tubercle only 8 mm laterally. An excessively valgus tibial cut will not displace the tubercle and the patella as far as mal-rotation of the tibial component. Effect of Internal Rotation of Tibial Component. By contrast, internal rotation of the tibial component by 22 degrees, which is only 4 degrees in excess of what has been described as tolerable by Berger and Rubash, displaces the tubercle 14 mm, a distance that would place the center of most patella over the center of the lateral femoral condyle, risking dislocation. Dynamically, as the knee flexes, if the tibia is able to rotate externally this forces the tubercle into an even more lateral position, guaranteeing that the patella will align lateral to the tip of the lateral femoral condyle, and dislocate. The design of femoral components, in particular the varus-valgus angle of the trochlear groove, has an effect on patellar tracking. This effect will be accentuated by the surgical alignment technique of the femoral and tibial components. Component positions that mimic the orientation of the normal anatomy usually include more valgus alignment of the femoral component. This rotates the proximal “entrance” of the femoral trochlear groove more medially, making it more difficult for the patella to descend in the trochlear groove

Extensor mechanism complications after or during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are problematic. The prevalence ranges from 1%-12% in TKA patients. Treatment results for these problems are inferior to the results of similar problems in non-TKA patients. Furthermore, the treatment algorithm is fundamentally different from that of non-TKA patients. The surgeon's first question does not focus on primary fixation; rather the surgeon must ask if the patient needs surgery and if so am I prepared to augment the repair? Quadriceps tendon rupture, peri-prosthetic patellar fracture, and patellar tendon rupture have similar treatment algorithms. Patients who are able to perform a straight leg raise and have less than a 20-degree extensor lag are generally treated non-operatively with extension bracing. The remaining patients will need surgical reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. Loose patellar components are removed. Primary repair alone is associated with poor results. Whole extensor mechanism allograft, Achilles tendon allograft, and synthetic mesh reconstruction are the current techniques for augmentation. In the acute setting if these are not available, hamstring tendon harvest and augmentation is an option. Achilles tendons and synthetic mesh are easier to obtain than an entire extensor mechanism but are limited to patients that have an intact patella and the patella that can be mobilised to within 2–3 cm of the joint line. No matter which technique is used the principles are: rigid distal/tubercle fixation, coverage of allograft/mesh with host tissue to decrease infection, tensioning the augment material in extension, no flexion testing of reconstruction and post-operative extension bracing

Success in knee revision begins in the office. The initial evaluations determine the implant design and pre-operative diagnosis. The physical examination identifies the presence of instability, stiffness, extensor mechanism malfunction and previous incisions all of which influence the planned procedure. Prior to surgery, arrangements are made to have all manner of revision implants, removal tools, and allograft material available. Removal of implants must be done with a focus on preserving bone stock and the extensor mechanism. Initial exposure involves release of the gutters, lateral subluxation of the patella and removal of the polyethylene insert. These maneuvers combined with a quadriceps snip provide exposure for implant removal in 80–90% of cases. More extensive exposure options include quadriceps turndown, tibial tubercle osteotomy, medial epicondylar osteotomy and a femoral peel. Tools needed for implant removal include thin osteotomes, offset osteotomes, thin saws and a high-speed bur. After polyethylene removal the femur followed by the tibia are removed. In many cases the existing well-fixed patellar component can remain. The implant cement or implant bone interface is approached for cemented and cementless implants, respectively. Tools are always directed parallel to the fixation surface. Offset osteotomes are helpful gaining access to the femoral notch when femoral pegs prevent access from the sides. Central keels or peripheral pegs can complicate tibial removal. Working completely around the keel from medial and lateral disrupts the peripheral tibial interface leaving just the central posterior metaphysis. Stacked osteotomes or a slap hammer can be used to lift the baseplate from the tibia

General Principles. All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex Mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion. Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6–8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture. End to end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture. These can be repaired end to end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture. Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag. A loose component and/or >20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions. While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevents a “tension-free” repair. In most chronic disruptions allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction is preferable. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally, an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate while in any patellar tendon defect, mesh repair has been shown to be effective

Maltracking of the patella associated with TKA is usually the result of several factors coming together in the same patient. Causes of maltracking include residual valgus limb alignment, valgus placement of the femoral component, patella alta, poor prosthetic geometry, internal rotation of the femoral or tibial component, excessive patellar thickness, asymmetric patellar preparation, failure to perform a lateral release when indicated, capsular dehiscence, and dynamic instability. Prior to wound closure after implantation of total knee arthroplasty, patellar tracking should be evaluated to assess the potential need for lateral release. The incidence of lateral release in the past was quite high in some series. Most experienced surgeons will report a lateral release rate less than 5% for varus knees. It is usually higher for valgus knees because they are often associated with patella alta and preoperative subluxation. The classic intraoperative test for patellar tracking has been referred to as the “rule of no thumb” In this test, first suggested by Fred Ewald, the patella is returned to the trochlear groove in extension with the capsule unclosed. The knee is then passively flexed and one assesses whether or not the patella tracks congruently without capsular closure. If it does and the medial facet of the patellar component contacts the medial aspect of the trochlea no lateral release need be considered. If the patella dislocates or tilts, lateral release may be necessary. The test should be repeated with 1 suture closing the capsule at the level of the superior pole. If tracking then becomes congruent without excessive tension on the suture, no release is necessary. If tilting still persists, some surgeons like to assess tracking with the tourniquet deflated so that any binding effect on the quadriceps can be eliminated from the test. A tight PCL can also impart apparent patellar tilt as the femoral component is drawn posteriorly while the tibia (with its tubercle) moves anteriorly

During total knee replacement (TKR), surgical navigation systems (SNS) allow accurate prosthesis component implantation by tracking the tibio-femoral joint (TFJ) kinematics in the original articulation at the beginning of the operation, after relevant trial components implantation, and, ultimately, after final component implantation and cementation. It is known that TKR also alters normal patello-femoral joint (PFJ) kinematics resulting frequently in PFJ disorders and TKR failure. More importantly, patellar tracking in case of resurfacing is further affected by patellar bone preparation and relevant component positioning. The traditional technique used to perform patellar resurfacing, even in navigated TKR, is based only on visual inspection of the patellar articular aspect for clamping patellar cutting jig and on a simple calliper to check for patellar thickness before and after bone cut, and, thus, without any computer assistance. Even though the inclusion in in-vivo navigated TKR of a procedure for supporting also patellar resurfacing based on patient-specific bone morphology seems fundamental, this have been completely disregarded till now, whose efficacy being assessed only in-vitro. This procedure has been developed, together with relevant software and surgical instrumentation, as an extension of current SNS, i.e. TKR is navigated, at the same time measuring the effects of every surgical action on PFJ kinematics. The aim of this study was to report on the first in-vivo experiences during TKR with patellar resurfacing. Four patients affected by primary gonarthrosis were implanted with a fixed bearing posterior-stabilised prosthesis (NRG, Stryker®-Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ-USA) with patellar resurfacing. All TKR were performed by means of two SNS (Stryker®-Leibinger, Freiburg, Germany) with the standard femoral/tibial trackers, the pointer, and a specially-designed patellar tracker. The novel procedure for patellar tracking was approved by the local ethical committee; the patients gave informed consent prior the surgery. This procedure implies the use of a second system, i.e. the patellar SNS (PSNS), with dedicated software for supporting patellar resurfacing and relative data processing/storing, in addition to the traditional knee SNS (KSNS). TFJ anatomical survey and kinematics data are shared between the two. Before surgery, both systems were initialised and the patellar tracker was assembled with a sterile procedure by shaping a metal grid mounted with three markers to be tracked by PSNS only. The additional patellar-resection-plane and patellar-cut-verification probes were instrumented with a standard tracker and a relevant reference frame was defined on these by digitisation with PSNS. Afterwards, the procedures for standard navigation were performed to calculate preoperative joint deformities and TFJ kinematics. The anatomical survey was performed also with PSNS, with relevant patellar anatomical reference frame definition and PFJ kinematics assessment according to a recent proposal. Standard procedures for femoral and tibial component implantation, and TFJ kinematics assessment were then performed by using relevant trial components. Afterwards, the procedure for patellar resection begun. Once the surgeon had arranged and fixed the patellar cutting jig at the desired position, the patellar-resection-plane probe was inserted into the slot for the saw blade. With this in place, the PSNS captured tracker data to calculate the planned level of patellar bone cut and the patellar cut orientation. Then the cut was executed, and the accuracy of this actual bone cut was assessed by means of the patellar-cut-verification probe. The trial patellar component was positioned, and, with all three trial components in place, TFJ and PFJ kinematics were assessed. Possible adjustments in component positioning could still be performed, until both kinematics were satisfactory. Finally, final components were implanted and cemented, and final TFJ and PFJ kinematics were acquired. A sterile calliper and pre- and post-implantation lower limb X-rays were used to check for the patellar thickness and final lower limb alignment. The novel surgical technique was performed successfully in all four cases without complication, resulting in 30 min longer TKR. The final lower limb alignment was within 0.5°, the resurfaced patella was 0.4±1.3 mm thinner than in the native, the patellar cut was 1.5°±3.0° laterally tilted. PFJ kinematics was taken within the reference normality. The patella implantation parameters were confirmed also by X-ray inspection; discrepancies in thickness up to 5 mm were observed between SNS- and calliper-based measurements. At the present experimental phase, a second separate PSNS was utilised not to affect the standard navigated TKR. The results reported support relevance, feasibility and efficacy of patellar tracking and PFJ kinematics assessment in in-vivo navigated TKR. The encouraging in-vivo results may lay ground for the design of a future clinical patella navigation system the surgeon could use to perform a more comprehensive assessment of the original whole knee anatomy and kinematics, i.e. including also PFJ. Patellar bone preparation would be supported for suitable patellar component positioning in case of resurfacing but, conceptually, also in not resurfacing if patellar anatomy and tracking assessment by SNS reveals no abnormality. After suitable adjustment and further tests, in the future if this procedure will be routinely applied during navigated TKR, abnormalities at both TFJ and PFJ can be corrected intra-operatively by more cautious bone cut preparation on the femur, tibia and also patella, in case of resurfacing, and by correct prosthetic component positioning

This video presentation serves to illustrate the pertinent aspects of bone preparation and implant insertion in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilizing porous tantalum as a fixation surface integral to the success of the procedure. The patient is typical of the surgical candidate frequently encountered for arthroplasty—a 60-year-old female with three compartment osteoarthritis of the knee, and manifesting a 10-degree varus deformity and 5-degree flexion contracture. She is a limited community ambulator without the use of support. A standard surgical exposure is utilised and the bone preparation is identical to that used in the fixation of cemented implants—no alignment guides, cutting guides, or referencing instrumentation is used that is unique in the femoral or tibial bone preparation. The principal difference is in the patellar preparation. Instrumentation unique to the cementless porous tantalum patella is utilised in order to achieve three goals: a composite implant/residual bone thickness that replicates the thickness of the native patella, the generation of a planar patellar resection that is parallel to the anterior cut of the femur, and secure initial stability of fixation. Keys to the initial fixation of the porous tantalum tibial and patellar components include the high surface friction of the material against bone, as well as the interference between the hexagonal pegs of each implant within the fixation holes (which are dimensionally smaller in diameter than the major and minor dimensions of the peg geometry). Care must be instituted to ensure that no bone or soft tissue debris is interposed at the mating surfaces of the implants that would compromise interface contact, and to carefully suction the peg holes to ensure that no debris impedes the complete seating of the pegs and the prosthesis. Lastly, all mating surfaces at the implant/bone interface must approach each other in a parallel fashion to optimise contact between the fixation surfaces and the bone resection surfaces. The procedure is simply, easily performed, and is time saving. Total elapsed time for insertion of all three TKA implants in this video is 90 seconds

General Principles: All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex Mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion: Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6–8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture: End-to-end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture: These can be repaired end-to-end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture: Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20 degree lag. A loose component and/or > 20 degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions: While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevents a “tension-free” repair. In most chronic disruptions allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction is preferable. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate while in any patellar tendon defect, mesh repair has been shown to be effective

Introduction. Patellar resurfacing affects patellofemoral (PF) kinematics, contact mechanics, and loading on the patellar bone. Patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often exhibit adaptations in movement patterns that may be linked to quadriceps deficiency and the mechanics of the reconstructed knee [1]. Previous comparisons of PF kinematics between dome and anatomic resurfacing have revealed differences in patellar sagittal plane flexion [2], but further investigation of PF joint mechanics is required to understand how these differences influence performance. The purpose of this study was to compare PF mechanics between medialized dome and medialized anatomic implants using subject-specific computational models. Methods. A high-speed stereo radiography (HSSR) system was used to capture 3D sub-mm measurement of bone and implant motion [3]. HSSR images were collected for 10 TKA patients with Attune® (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN) posterior-stabilized, rotating-platform components, 5 with medialized dome and 5 with medialized anatomic patellar components (3M/7F, 62.5±6.6 years, 2.2±0.6 years post-surgery, BMI: 26.2±3.5 kg/m. 2. ), performing two activities of daily living: knee extension and lunge (Figure 1). Relative motions were tracked using Autoscoper (Brown University, Providence, RI) for implant geometries obtained from the manufacturer. A statistical shape model was used to predict the patella and track motions [4]. Subject-specific finite element models of the experiment were developed for all subjects and activities [5]. The model included implant components, patella, quadriceps, patellar tendon, and medial and lateral PF ligaments (Figure 2a). While tibiofemoral kinematics were prescribed based on experimental data, the PF joint was unconstrained. A constant 1000N quadriceps load was distributed among four muscle groups. Soft tissue attachments and pre-strain in PF ligaments were calibrated to match experimental kinematics [5]. Model outputs included PF kinematics, patellar and contact force ratios, patellar tendon angle, and moment arm. Results and Discussion. Load-bearing activities presented larger variations in PF kinematics and mechanics between dome and anatomic subjects. Consistent with previous findings [2], patients with medialized anatomic geometry achieved greater patellar flexion than those with the medialized dome during lunge (16±3° from 40–100° knee flexion), and demonstrated PF kinematics closer to that of the natural knee (Figure 2b) [6]. Dome subjects experienced greater PF internal-external range-of-motion compared to the anatomic subjects (8±5°). Model PF kinematics closely replicated the experiment with average root-mean-square differences of flexion-extension<5°, internal-external<3°, and medial-lateral<2 mm. Dome subjects demonstrated larger contact force ratios than anatomic, but presented smaller patellar force ratios in deep flexion (–60°). Smaller PF flexion angles in dome implants likely influenced the increase in contact force ratio, which may increase implant forces and decrease quadriceps efficiency. In contrast, the flexed position of the anatomic design distributed load to the patellar tendon at deeper flexion angles, which may improve extensor function (Figure 3). The current modeling framework can inform implant designers on the impact of articular geometry on quadriceps efficiency

General Principles. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–8 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion - Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6 to 8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft can provide additional structural support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture - End to end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture - These can be repaired end to end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turn-down may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture - Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag. A loose component and/or >20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions - While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevent a “tension-free” repair. In most chronic disruptions complete allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction is preferable. If the patella itself has not retracted proximally and remains intact other allograft soft tissues are a viable alternative. All grafts should be repaired tightly with the knee in full extension

Aims

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) offers the potential for strong biological fixation compared with cemented TKA where fixation is achieved by the mechanical integration of the cement. Few mid-term results are available for newer cementless TKA designs, which have used additive manufacturing (3D printing). The aim of this study was to present mid-term clinical outcomes and implant survivorship of the cementless Stryker Triathlon Tritanium TKA.

General Principles. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–8 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion. Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6–8 weeks of immobilisation. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft can provide additional structural support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture. End to end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture. These can be repaired end to end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turn-down may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture. Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension if the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20 degree lag. A loose component and/or >20 degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions. While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevent a “tension-free” repair. In most chronic disruptions complete allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction is preferable. If the patella itself has not retracted proximally and remains intact, other allograft soft tissues are a viable alternative. All grafts should be repaired tightly with the knee in full extension

When dealing with the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) there are three philosophies. Some advocate resurfacing in all cases, others do not resurface, and a third group selectively resurfaces the patella. The literature does not offer one clear and consistent message on the topic. Treatment of the patella and the ultimate result is multifactorial. Factors include the patient, surgical technique, and implant design. With respect to the patient, inflammatory versus non-inflammatory arthritis, pre-operative presence or absence of anterior knee pain, age, sex, height, weight, and BMI affect results of TKA. Surgical technique steps to enhance the patellofemoral articulation include: 1) Restore the mechanical axis to facilitate patellofemoral tracking. 2) Select the appropriate femoral component size with respect to the AP dimension of the femur. 3) When performing anterior chamfer resection, measure the amount of bone removed in the center of the resection and compare to the prosthesis. Do not overstuff the patellofemoral articulation by taking an inadequate amount of bone. 4) Rotationally align the femur appropriately using a combination of the AP axis, the transepicondylar axis, the posterior condylar axis, and the tibial shaft axis. 5) If faced with whether to medialise or lateralise the femoral component, always lateralise. This will enhance patellofemoral tracking. 6) When resurfacing the patella, only evert the patella after all other bony resections have been performed. Remove peripheral osteophytes and measure the thickness of the patella prior to resection. Make every effort to leave at least 15 mm of bone and never leave less than 13 mm. 7) Resect the patella. The presenter prefers a freehand technique using the insertions of the patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon as a guide, sawing from inferior to superior, then from medial to lateral to ensure a smooth, flat, symmetrical resection. Medialise the patellar component and measure the thickness of reconstruction. 8) When not resurfacing the patella, surgeons generally remove all the peripheral osteophytes, and some perform denervation using electrocautery around the perimeter. 9) Determine appropriate patellofemoral tracking only after the tourniquet is released. 10) Close the knee in flexion so as not to tether the soft tissues about the patella and the extensor. With or without patellar resurfacing, implant design plays in important role in minimizing patellofemoral complications. Newer designs feature a so-called “swept back” femur in which the chamfer resection is deepened, and patellofemoral overstuffing is minimised. Lateralizing the trochlear groove on the anterior flange, orienting it in valgus alignment, and gradually transitioning to midline have improved patellofemoral tracking. Extending the trochlear groove as far as possible into the tibiofemoral articulation has decreased patellofemoral crepitation and patellar clunk in posterior stabilised designs. With respect to the tibial component, providing patellar relief anteriorly in the tibial polyethylene has facilitated range of motion and reduced patellar impingement in deep flexion. On the patella side, the all-polyethylene patella remains the gold standard. While data exist to support all three viewpoints in the treatment of the patella in TKA, it is the presenter's opinion that the overwhelming data support patella resurfacing at the time of primary TKA. It is clear from the literature that the status of the patellofemoral articulation following TKA is multifactorial. Surgical technique and implant design are key to a well-functioning patellofemoral articulation. Pain is the primary reason patients seek to undergo TKA. Since our primary goal is to relieve pain, and there has been a higher incidence of anterior knee pain reported without patellar resurfacing, why not resurface the patella?

Success in knee revision begins in the office. The initial evaluations determine the implant design and pre-operative diagnosis. The physical examination identifies the presence of instability, stiffness, extensor mechanism malfunction and previous incisions all of which influence the planned procedure. Prior to surgery arrangements are made to have all manner of revision implants, removal tools, and allograft material available. Removal of implants must be done with a focus on preserving bone stock and the extensor mechanism. Initial exposure involves release of the gutters, lateral subluxation of the patella and removal of the polyethylene insert. These manoeuvres combined with a quadriceps snip provide exposure for implant removal in 80–90% of cases. More extensive exposure options include quadriceps turndown, tibial tubercle osteotomy, medial epicondylar osteotomy and a femoral peel. Tools needed for implant removal include thin osteotomes, offset osteotomes, thin saws and a high-speed bur. After polyethylene removal the femur followed by the tibia are removed. In many cases the existing well-fixed patellar component can remain. The implant cement or implant bone interface is approached for cemented and cementless implants respectively. Tools are always directed parallel to the fixation surface. Offset osteotomes are helpful gaining access to the femoral notch when femoral pegs prevent access from the sides. Central keels or peripheral pegs can complicate tibial removal. Working completely around the keel from medial and lateral disrupts the peripheral tibial interface leaving just the central posterior metaphysis. Stacked osteotomes or a slap hammer can be used to lift the baseplate from the tibia

We analyzed the causes of 113 revision total knee arthroplasties in 84 patients between December 1996 and June 2008. Patient history, medical record and radiographs were reviewed to detect the main cause of failure of primary total knee arthroplasty. The causes of revision total knee arthroplasty were as follows: 44 infections (38.9 %), 34 loosenings (30.1%), 22 polyethylene wears or breakages (19.5%), 5 stiffness (4.4%), 4 polyethylene dislocations (3.5%), 2 patellar dislocations (1.8%), 1 patellar component failure and 1 instability (0.9%, each). The mean interval from the index operation to the revision surgery was 59 months (1 month-20 years). Infection was the most common causes of revision TKA and followed by loosening, wear or breakage of polyethylene, stiff knee, dislocation of polyethylene and so on

Introduction. The metal-backed patella was originally designed to address shortcomings found with cemented, all-polyethylene patellae. However, complications relating to an all-polyethylene patella were reported to account for up to half of all knee revisions. At the same time, good fixation with bone ingrowth was observed in both titanium and cobalt chromium porous-coated patellae. The advantages provided by using a metal-backed patella, such as uniform load sharing, decreased polyethylene deformation, and potential for biological fixation, may be unjustly outweighed by the fear of patellar component failure; high rates of failure have not been inherent to all metal-backed patella designs. Over the past decade, we have used a metal-backed patella design with excellent results that may be due largely to the design features of the component. Also, we believe there are certain selection criteria that should be strictly adhered to when implanting metal-backed patellae. Correct selection criteria and improved component design strongly indicate the use of press-fit metal-backed patellae. Methods. This single-center study was designed to conduct clinical and independent radiographic review of primary metal-backed, press-fit patella patients with a minimum five-year follow-up. Potential patients were recruited from a group of existing metal-backed patella patients within the principal investigator's medical practice. All patients recruited for this study were required to have undergone primary knee replacement surgery at least five years prior to clinical and radiographic evaluation. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease. Patients with a BMI >40 were excluded from this study. Radiographic analysis was conducted by an independent reviewer according to the current Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System. Any radiographs that the reviewer deemed questionable were shown to a second independent orthopaedic surgeon for review, comment, and validation of observations. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was determined for all metal-backed patellae. For survival analysis, only knees with radiographic data were included (74 knees). KSS, WOMAC, and SF-36 scores were calculated also. Results. Seventy-four patients (88 knees) were enrolled in the study, 31 women (41.2%) and 43 men (58.1%). At the time of surgery, the average age was 59.7 years (range, 40–86 years), and the average BMI was 30.6 (range, 19.1–39.6). The breakdown of patients who completed the study and those who were lost to follow-up is shown in Table 1. One metal-backed patella was revised at 49 months for loosening at the bone/implant interface. Survivorship of the metal-backed patellae at minimum five-year follow-up was estimated to be 93.95% with bounds of 73.61% and 98.74%. No radiolucencies greater than 1 mm were observed in any radiographs (Fig. 1), with the exception of the one revision case. Conclusion. Our experience with this metal-backed patella design has been excellent. Failure does not occur due to dissociation of the plastic. As the porous coating is almost under constant compression, biological fixation is assured in most instances, as confirmed by our minimum five-year radiological results. Improved component design and adherence to the correct patient selection criteria absolutely indicate the use of press-fit metal-backed patellae

Introduction. Patellofemoral (PF) complications are among the most frequently observed adverse events after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It has been reported that PF complications after TKA include decreasing knee range of motion, anterior knee pain, quadriceps and patellar-tendon rupture, patellar subluxation, and partial abrasion and loosening of the patellar component. Although recent improvements in surgical technique and prosthetic design have decreased these complications, the percentage of patients who have a revision TKA for PF complications still ranged up to 6.6% to 12%. For the present study, we hypothesized that the alignment of the femoral component is correlated with PF contact stress. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between femoral component alignment and PF contact stress in vivo, using a pressure sensor in patients who had favorable extension-flexion gap balance during TKA. Methods. Thirty knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis that underwent posterior stabilized mobile-bearing TKA using identical prostheses (PFC Sigma RPF; Depuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) by a single surgeon (TM) with modified gap technique under a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system (Vector Vision 1.61; Brain Lab, Heimstetten, Germany) were evaluated. PF contact stress was measured intraoperatively and compared with the alignment of the femoral component including intraoperative navigation data concerning medial shift of the patella and lateral tilt of the patella, postoperative coronal femoral component angle (alpha angle), postoperative sagittal femoral component angle (gamma angle), postoperative condylar twist angle (CTA), postoperative lateral condylar lift-off angle, and postoperative mechanical femoral component angle (mFCA). In addition, postoperative Insall-Salvati ratio (I-S ratio) was measured by dividing the length of patellar tendon by the greatest diagonal length of the patella. Results. Maximum PF stress was 2.4 ± 1.9 MPa, medial shift of the patella was 2.6 ± 1.5 mm, and lateral tilt of the patella was 8.5 ± 4.2 degrees. The PF contact stress was not correlated sagittal and coronal alignment of the femoral component and patella tracking, whereas rotational alignment of the femoral component was negatively correlated with the PF contact stress (r = −0.718, p < 0.01). Discussion and conclusion. Multiple regression analysis shows that PF contact stress correlates with CTA, I-S ratio positively correlates with PF contact stress in Spearman correlation analysis. The results of the present study showed a negative correlation between maximum stress in the PF joint and CTA. It has been reported that excessive external rotation increases the medial flexion gap, leading to symptomatic flexion instability of the femoral component. In addition, external rotation of the femoral component can cause relative medialization of the trochlear groove during flexion, resulting in anterior knee pain. Therefore, we should carefully decide the proper rotational alignment of the femoral component. It has been reported that PF contact stress in a normal knee was from 2.1 to 2.9 MPa in a cadaveric study. In the present study, patients with rotational alignment of the femoral component after TKA between 1.2° and 2.2° internally rotated from CEA had PF contact stress in this normal range

Introduction. MERA Quest Knee System (Quest Knee) is a posterior cruciate ligament–retaining prosthesis considering the anatomical features and lifestyles of the Japanese. As for the anatomical features, we reduced the size of prosthesis and set a smaller interval of sizes because Japanese knees are smaller and flatter than those of Caucasians. As for the lifestyles, we evaluated in vivo patellar tracking during deep knee flexion and the condylar geometry in the axial plane of magnetic resonance imaging. It was found that the patella sank deeply into the intercondylar notch and that the articular surface of the lateral condyle began to curve steeply. We adopted this shape and engraved the lateral condyle deep to reduce the pressure of the patellofemoral joint and to get better range of motion (ROM). For the contact pressure rise in the femorotibial joint by engraving the lateral condyle, the insert was suited to the shape of the femoral component. Furthermore, we increased the thickness of the posterior flange of the femoral component and changed the posterior radius of curvature gradually, and this shape allowed the flexion of 155°. We have used Quest Knee for clinical applications from October 2009. We studied the short-term results of Quest Knee. Methods. Between June 2010 and July 2013, the same senior surgeon performed 59 consecutive primary operations with Quest Knee. Forty patients (44 knees) were women, and 14 patients (15 knees) were men. The mean patient age was 72.5 years (range, 59–89 years). All were osteoarthritis knees. Coronal deformity was varus in 58 knees and valgus in one knee. All operations were performed with a measured resection technique, and all patellae were resurfaced. Clinical evaluations were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association knee rating score (JOA score), and clinical ROM and standing femorotibial angle (FTA) were measured. Additionally, three-dimensional motion analysis of the patellar component during squatting was performed by the image matching method with image correlations. Results. The mean follow-up period was 17.4 months (range, 6–43 months). The JOA score at preoperative and follow-up were 57.5 ± 10.1 and 87.5 ± 5.6 points, respectively (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1). The ROM at preoperative and follow-up were 127.4 ± 11.1 and 126.2 ± 9.0° (P = 0.47) (Fig. 2). The mean FTA at preoperative and follow-up were 184.2 and 172.3°. With regard to the three-dimensional motion analysis, the patella showed lateral shift during squatting (Fig. 3). Discussion. As for the patellofemoral contact pressure at flexion in total knee arthroplasty, a biomechanical study has reported that the pressures of posterior cruciate ligament–retaining and posterior-stabilized knees were 3.2 and 2.8 times as much as the body weight. This report suggests that the reduction of the pressure of the patellofemoral joint during deep knee flexion results in better ROM. We suppose that Quest Knee reduced the pressure, led the patella to the lateral side, and achieved better ROM. Conclusions. Short-term results of Quest Knee were good. More detailed studies are needed to get better function and long-term durability

We report our experience with LCS Patellofemoral joint replacement. Between September 2003 and November 2007, 66 consecutive patients were reviewed retrospectively who underwent LCS patellofemoral joint replacement. There were 13 males and 51 females with a mean age of 61.6 years (range 43–78). The average follow-up was 22 months (range 11–51 months). To assess the outcome, revision for any cause was taken as the end point for this study. A total of 14 (21.2%) revision operations were carried out at an average of 15.6 months (range 8–29 months) from the initial operation. The reasons for revision were mal-tracking of patella (3), dislocated patellar button (2), persistent unexplained pain (5) and progression of arthritis (4). Amongst the remaining 52 patients, 8 are still experiencing pain and not entirely satisfied with the procedure. 42 patients (63%) have a satisfactory outcome so far. All of them who underwent revision to a total knee replacement were satisfied with their outcome with relief in their symptoms. Revision to a total knee replacement is not a straightforward procedure, especially removing the metal backed patellar component. The revision rate of over 21% is unacceptably high to recommend the procedure as a routine. Based on our experience, we conclude that LCS patellofemoral replacement should be used with caution

The authors studied the short-term results following patellar resurfacing using trabecular metal patella. Ten patients underwent primary (2 cases) or revision (8 cases) TKA with the use of a trabecular metal patella and were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 24 months. All patients had marked patellar bone deficiency or patellar absence precluding resurfacing with a standard cemented patellar button. The all polyethylene patella was cemented into the trabecular metal base and the remaining patella bone stock; additional fixation was provided by non-adsorbable sutures through the peripheral holes on the metal shell. No intraoperative complications occurred. There was no displacement of any trabecular metal patellar component and no patellar fractures. The fixation appeared excellent at three to six months radiographic evaluation with uniform bone contact in the peripheral regions in both lateral an Merchant radiographic views. The mean Knee Society scores improved in all patients

Persistent patellofemoral symptoms can cause patient dissatisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate patellar tracking and patient outcomes utilizing two implant designs in TKA. Medical records and radiographs of two groups of 100 consecutive patients each were reviewed. All patients underwent posterior stabilized TKA by a single surgeon; using the same operative technique but two different implant designs (Group 1: Asymmetric femoral component with deep congruent trochlear groove and Group 2: Asymmetric femoral component with shallow trochlear groove). Data was collected on demographic characteristics, patellar tilt, displacement, prosthesis-bone angle, HSS Patella Score, Knee Society Knee and Function Score. Patellar tilt more than 5° was considered significant. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS v.16.0.3 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Patients' age and sex were equivalent in the two groups (p>0.57). Median follow up was 2.2 years. Pre-operative incidence of patellar tilt was similar in both groups (18% vs. 17%). After surgery, these values changed to 30% and 77% respectively. This was statistically significant (p<0.001). The Knee Society Knee and Function Score improved significantly in both groups, however the improvement in the function score was significantly greater in the first group (p=0.001). The improvement in Knee Society Knee Score (50.24 and 48.08; p= 0.18) and post-operative HSS Score (93 vs. 91; p=0.19) were not statistically significant. Our findings suggest that despite using the same operative technique, patellar tracking was significantly different between the two groups, a finding most likely attributable to the design of the femoral component. Whether the difference in patellar maltracking will affect long-term survival of the patellar component remains to be seen

Introduction and Objectives: There is more experience with the use of cemented models of knee prosthesis. However, non-cemented models are proving to have equivalent survival. Our aim was to analyze our experience of long term survival of non-cemented total knee replacement prosthesis. Materials and Methods: We included the patients operated in our unit between 1989 and 1996. In all cases the same implant was used (LCS Total Knee Replacement, Depuy, Warsaw, IN). We included a total of 129 knees (117 patients). The variables we studied were: Age, sex, follow-up time, KSS score, implant survival and reasons for revision. Results: Follow-up was 14.5 years and mean age was 78.7 years. A total of 60 knees did not complete the study correctly. For the 69 knees that remained in the study, the results were: 11 TKR (16%) were reoperated: 2 due to dissociation-dislocation of the patellar component, 3 due to wear or rupture of the tibial polyethylene, 6 were revised due to aseptic loosening. There were no cases of infection. The mean KSS score was 90.29. Discussion and Conclusions: In our experience, the use of non-cemented TKR prosthesis:. Provides an excellent clinical and functional result, assessed by KSS. There is survival of 91% of the implants at 14.5 years. If we include all reoperations, survival free of reintervention was 84%

Aim of the study: Compromised patellar bone stock poses significant technical challenges in knee revision surgery. The alternatives that have been proposed include reinsertion of a biconvex patellar component, patellar bone grafting, patellectomy, and leaving the unresurfaced patellar bone remnant in place. Various results have been reported with these methods, but not one of them has yet been widely accepted. Methods: A novel sagittal osteotomy that was used in four patients is described. Results: This osteotomy leaves the extensor mechanism intact and allows the medial and lateral halves of the residual patella to hinge open in the shape of a “gull wing.” This conforms to the femoral trochlear groove and when combined with particulate bone grafts, it consolidates as a mass resembling a patella. Conclusion: The procedure has been limited to severe cases and obviates the need for patellectomy

Aims

Debate remains whether the patella should be resurfaced during total knee replacement (TKR). For non-resurfaced TKRs, we estimated what the revision rate would have been if the patella had been resurfaced, and examined the risk of re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing.

Introduction. Opponents of patellar resurfacing during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) note unique complications associated with resurfacing. Problems include over-stuffing (the creation of a composite patellar-prosthesis thickness greater than the native patella) that may contribute to reduced range of motion; and creation of a patellar remnant that is too thin (in order to avoid over-stuffing) that may contribute to post-operative fracture. Factors including surgical technique, prosthesis design and patient anatomy may contribute to these problems. This study was performed to define the native patellar anatomy, and to compare the effect of differences in component thickness between manufacturers. Methods. This retrospective, IRB approved study reviewed 803 knees that underwent primary TKA between 2005 and 2011 with a single surgeon. Patellar resurfacing was performed with a round, polyethylene component from one of two different implant designs using the same surgical technique. Data recorded for each patient included: gender; patellar thickness before and after resurfacing; the dimensions and manufacturer of the prosthesis. The residual patellar bone thickness after resection was calculated. Results. Mean (SD) native patellar thickness was 25.24mm (2.11) in males, versus 22.13mm (1.89) in females (P = <0.001). 47/313 (15%) of males had increases in the composite patellar thickness after resurfacing, versus 120/480 (25%) of females (P < 0.001). 123/480 (26%) of females had a residual patella thickness <= 13mm, versus 12/313 (4%) of males (P <0.001). Finally, 79/265 (30%) of patients with a patellar prosthesis from manufacturer B had increases in the composite thickness, versus 88/522 (17%) of patients with manufacturer A (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Both patient gender (due to smaller native patellae in females) and prosthesis design (thicker components from manufacturer B) are risk factors for over-stuffing of the patella or over-resection of the patella. These findings suggest that patellar component design can be improved for female patients

To investigate the amount and the factors of changes of the thickness of tibial polyethylene insert in revisional TKA compared to original thickness of primary TKA. We analyzed one hundred and twenty cases of wear, loosening and instability were included in this study. Infection cases were excluded. The period between the primary TKA and revision TKA was 88.5 months in average (range 1 to 17 year 3 months). The amount of increase of the tibial polyethylene thickness according to the main cause of failure and the wear site was analyzed. The results of this study were: 1: The increased thickness was 6.7 mm in average. 2: The amount of increase in case of wear of anterior portion only was 2.3 mm, which was below the average. 3: The loosening cases showed 8.2 mm increase in average which was significantly greater than the average. 4: The cases of greater wear of medial side than lateral side showed 8.5 mm increase of the thickness which was significantly greater than the average. 5: The cases of only medial side wear showed 5.5 mm increase of the thickness, which was below the average. 6: The cases of the other causes such as patellar component wear, generalized wear, wear of posterior portion only, early wear less than 5 years after primary TKA because of flat polyethylene surface showed comparable amount of wear to the average. The thickness of tibial polyethylene insert in revisional TKA compare to original thickness of primary TKA showed that it increased 6.7mm in average and was variable according to the cause of failure

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of prosthetic patellar resurfacing on outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty in a matched cohort study. From January 1997 to December 1999 126 patients who underwent revision of total knee arthroplasty were identified. The status of the patella was ascertained post revision as to the presence or absence of patellar prosthesis. At a minimum of two years follow-up, pain and function were assessed by questionnaire for WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 and patient satisfaction data. Co-morbidity, surgical exposure, HSS knee scores and ROM were also collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Follow-up was obtained in 110 patients (52 with patellar component, 58 bony shell), matched for age (mean 70 and 67 years), sex and co-morbidity scores and followed for a minimum of two years. There was no significant difference between the two cohorts with regards to outcomes of WOMAC pain scores (mean 66 and 74, p=0.14), WOMAC function scores (mean 59 and 65, p=0.22), Oxford- 12 scores (mean 57 and 64, p=0.17), and satisfaction score outcomes (57 and 68, p=0.14). It remains controversial whether the patient’s pain, function and satisfaction are affected in revision total knee arthroplasty by patellar prosthetic resurfacing. Insufficient patellar bone stock may preclude prosthetic resurfacing in which case patel-loplasty is performed. From this series, the presence or absence of a patellar prosthesis does not appear to sig-nificantly affect pain, function, or satisfaction outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty

Aims: The purpose of this report is to present the short-term clinical performance of total knee arthroplasties performed with the Scorpio+ posteriorly stabilized mobile bearing knee. Methods: 100 Scorpio+ knees were implanted in 96 patients consecutively by the same surgeon and evaluated at one year of follow-up. All patients were assessed clinically using the IKS Score, Western Ontario McMaster Score (WOMAC), a chair rise evaluation6 and radiographically with long leg radiographs, standard A/P, lateral and patellar skyline views. Results: At one year of follow-up the average Range of Motion was 123° with an IKS Score averaging 191, an average knee score of 94, an average functional knee score of 97, and an average WOMAC score of 92. Furthermore, 95 out of 96 patients were able to arise from a chair without using their arms at 1 year of follow-up. Radiographically no radiolucent lines were visible and all patellar components were centered. Conclusions: Patients with the Scorpio+ MBK demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes especially regarding overall stability, range of motion (average flexion 123°) and extensor mechanism function with 98% of patients being able to arise from a chair without the use of their arms at three months of follow-up

Compromised patellar bone stock poses significant the chnical problems in primary and revision knee arthroplasty. In these situations, traditional approaches have included: non resurfacing, patellectomy, patellar bone grafting, ‘Gull-Wing’ osteotomy. A new material (Trabecular Metal) fabricated using a tantalum metal and vapor deposition techhnique that create a metallic strut configuration with 80%porosity, and physical and mechanical properties similar to bone has been introduced. The authors studied the short-term results following patellar resurfacing using trabecular metal patella in primary and revision total knee arhroplasty (TKA). Nine patients undergoing primary (2 cases) or revision (7 cases) TKA with the use of a trabecular metal patella were evaluated at a mean of 16 months follow-up. All patients had marked patellar bone deficiency precluding resurfacing with a standard cemented patellar button. The all polyethylene patela was cemented into the trabecular metal base and the remaining patella bone stock; additional fixation was provided by # 2 non absorbable sutures through the peripheral holes on the metal shell. Revision TKA may be complicated by severe patellar bone loss that preclude implantantion of a standard cemented patellar component. Several options including patellectomy, non resurfacing and osteotomy or grafting of remaining bony shell have been proposed. It is rare in primary knee arthroplasty that the patella has been so eroded that resurfacing is not feasible. Trabecular metall patella may be indicate in the complex revision or even primary knee arthroplasty in which all that remains of the patella is a thin shell of anterior cortical. The short-term results of patellar resurfacing with trabecular metal have demonstrated favorable results

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a high flex porous tantalum metal monoblock component system implanted through a MIS technique. A fellowship trained surgeon proficient in MIS surgery performed 109 consecutive TKAs in 95 patients. Patients were implanted with a tantalum monoblock tibia and a fiber-metal cruciate-retaining high flex femur through a MIS midvastus approach. Ninety uncemented porous tantulum monoblock patellae and 19 cemented all polyethylene patellae were implanted. Knee Society scores and Knee Society radiographic scores were calculated in all patients. Follow-up for a minimum of 2 years was performed in 109 knees. The average follow up was 39 months. Sixty-six percent of the patients were female and 34% male. The average age was 66 years. The average preoperative Knee Society Knee score was 36. The average preop Knee Society Functional Score was 46. Osteoarthritis was the primary diagnosis in 104 knees. Rheumatoid arthritis and Hemophilia was the diagnosis in two knees each. The average Knee Society Knee Score improved to 89. The average Knee Society Function score improved to 86. 106 of the knees were rated good or excellent and three knees were rated poor. Two patellar revisions were performed for loose components and one for patellar misalignment. One patella fracture occurred that required ORIF. One femoral component was revised for loosening. There were nonprogressive radiographic lucencies demonstrated on 4 tibial components. One tibial component was rated loose. There were radiographic lucencies on 5 femoral components, all nonprogressive. There were two uncemented tantalum patellar components with stable radiolucencies. Early results in 109 consecutive porous tantalum metal tibial and high flex cruciate-retaining femoral components implanted through an MIS midvastus approach have a high rate of success at a minimum followup of two years

Introduction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mid-term results of clinical and radiographic results Hi-tech knee a cementless total knee arthroplasty (Nakashima medical Co. Ltd., Okayama, Japan). This TKA system was developed in Chiba University from 1994. The characteristic of this system are flat on flat CR-TKA and cementless fixation. Contact surface are made of titanium alloy and UHMWPE, which is produced by the direct compression mold manufacturing method. Material and Method. Between May 1998 and May 2005, we performed 53 consecutive primary TKAs for 42 patients. There were 41 women and 1 man with a mean age of 64.4 years (39 to 78 years). The average follow up period was 7 years 8 months (5 years to 12 years). Osteoarthritis knee were 21 knees and rheumatoid arthritis were 32 knees. The mean pre-operative FTA was 181.7 degrees (168 to 203 degrees). The method of the operation went in measured cut technique for all cases. All 53 knees were implanted with a cruciate retaining prosthesis. All comportments, included a patella component, were fixed without cement. Clinical evaluations were performed according to American Knee Society (KS) system, knee score and function score. Results. The mean preoperative and postoperative, at the latest follow up, maximum flexion angles were 104 and 114 degrees, respectively. The KS knee score and function score improved from 47.5 and 38.9 points before surgery to 87.6 and 80.4 points after surgery, respectively. Postoperative alignment FTA average 174.8 degrees. Within follow up period, it maintained good valgus-varus stability. There was no major loosening. Six knees (11%) were observed radiolucent line at medial tibia plateau less than 1mm. No revisions of TKA were required because of loosening or sinking. There was also no problem at patellar component. Conclusions. Hi-Tech knee a cementless TKA system was made for the suitable for a Japanese knee, strong initial fixation in a concept. The patella component is also cementless fixation. Contact surface are made of titanium alloy and UHMWPE of the direct compression mold method, it was able to protect the abrasion of the polyethylene in a stable state, too. The mid-term results of Hi-Tech knee a cementless TKA, not only OA but also RA patient knee, provided almost good results

We reviewed the outcome of 422 primary cemented Kinemax total knee arthroplasties implanted into 369 patients over a period of five years, from January 1989. The operations were carried out at two NHS district general hospitals and one teaching hospital by 31 surgeons. During the period of review, 49 patients died and ten knees were lost to follow-up (68 knees). The mean Knee Society score improved from 28 before to 89 after surgery, and the mean function score increased from 23 to 79. The range of flexion improved from 92° to 105°. These improvements were maintained throughout the period of study. At the latest review radiolucent lines of 1 mm were seen around 15% of tibial components, 1.4% of patellar components and 9.5% of femoral components. In no case were these changes progressive. Using revision as the endpoint, cumulative survival was 99% after five years and 96.95% after nine years. All revisions were undertaken for deep infection or secondary trauma. Our study has shown that the Kinemax total knee replacement, when carried out with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament by surgeons of varying experience, produces very satisfactory results in the medium term

Aims

It has previously been shown that higher-volume hospitals have better outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). We were unable to identify any studies which investigated the effect of surgeon volume on the outcome of rTKA. We sought to investigate whether patients of high-volume (HV) rTKA surgeons have better outcomes following this procedure compared with those of low-volume (LV) surgeons.

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an alumina-based total knee arthroplasty system (Low Friction Anatomical, LFA, Kyocera, Kyoto, Japan). The system, which uses modern materials and contemporary component design, has been in clinical use in Japan since 1992. The system uses an alumina femoral component that articulates against standard polyethylene tibial and patellar components. The retrospective study evaluated the clinical performance of amodern-style ceramic femoral component and included 60 knees (49 patients) with an average follow-up of 3.8 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Knee Rating Scale, which is comparable to the Knee Society Rating Scale used in the United States. Radiographic outcomes were assessed by the operating surgeon and another independent reviewer. The radiographs were reviewed for the presence or absence of lytic lines, implant and anatomical alignment, and other pertinent radiographic findings. Complications during the follow-up period were noted. Total knee replacement with the LFA system improved JOA scores in 98% of the cases. Mechanical and prosthetic alignment were satisfactory for all knees. The following results were noted:. No fractures or failures associated with the alumina ceramic femoral component. No problems with subsidence or abnormal bone remodeling. Absence of lytic lines in 96% of cases. Absence of complication in 94% of cases. Overall success rate of 96% at an average follow-up of 3.8 years. An alumina-based total knee replacement system was found to be a safe and effective means of treating the arthritic knee joint. The use of ceramics in total knee arthroplasty applications provides an opportunity for a low friction bearing interface and a completely metal-free total joint system

Aims

In the last decade, interest in partial knee arthroplasties and bicruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties has increased. In addition, patient-related outcomes and functional results such as range of movement and ambulation may be more promising with less invasive procedures such as bicompartmental arthroplasty (BCA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after a third-generation patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) combined with a medial or lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Aims

Recent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs have featured more anatomical morphologies and shorter tibial keels. However, several reports have raised concerns about the impact of these modifications on implant longevity. The aim of this study was to report the early performance of a modern, cemented TKA design.

Introduction. We introduce the concept of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) fingerprinting as a tool to characterize and graphically convey the sensitivity of a TKA design to surgical variability in implant component position and patient-related anatomic factors. Identifying sensitive directions preoperatively which would cause undesirable effects may decrease revision surgery by informing surgical decisions and planning. To provide several examples of TKA fingerprinting, we estimated and compared the contact forces in a single TKA type for several configurations, simulating surgical variability and patient-related anatomical factors during a loaded deep squat. The purpose of this study is not to analyze the behavior of this specific TKA design but rather to illustrate a tool that could be used to show, in general, how surgical errors or anatomical factors can alter patello-femoral (PF) and tibio-femoral (TF) contact forces compared to its own reference configuration. Materials and methods. Computed tomography images of one full cadaveric leg were used to generate 3D models of the bones and to obtain a physiological knee model assuming standard positions of the main soft tissue insertions. A fixed bearing posterior stabilized knee TKA design was considered in this study. The prosthesis was a medium size, replaced both cruciate ligaments and resurfaced the patella. Following standard surgical procedure, the TKA was virtually implanted, thus defining its reference configuration. Each derivative replaced knee model was then obtained by changing the values of one parameter, or a combination of two, in a range based on literature and surgical experience (Table 1). A 10 s loaded squat to 120° was performed for each configuration, with a constant vertical hip load of 200 N. These settings match the experimental tests performed in a previous in-vitro analysis on cadaver legs. Each replaced model was developed and analyzed using a validated musculoskeletal modeling software. The model of the knee included TF contacts and PF contacts of the TKA components, passive soft tissues and active muscle elements. The external forces (ground reaction and weights), the muscle forces (quadriceps and hamstrings) and the frictional forces are applied to the knee joint through the machine. The mechanical properties of the tissues were obtained from literature. With these settings, for each model, both the maximum PF and TF contact forces have been evaluated. Results. Examples of fingerprint graphs are shown presenting the main results (Figures 1 and 2). Figure 1 displays a fixed rotation femoral component and a variable rotation tibial component. FIgure 2 displays a variable rotation patella component. Discussion and Conclusion. In general a TKA should be implanted without surgical errors to obtain the biomechanical behavior for which a TKA was designed because surgical errors can alter the functionality of a TKA. A fingerprinting tool for TKAs was developed and used to show the sensitivity of PF and TF contact forces in surgical variability. The graphs show that PF contact forces are altered mostly by errors in positioning of the patellar component, while TF contact forces are mostly affected internal and external femoral component rotation and ligament release

There are basically 4 ways advocated to determine the proper femoral component rotation during TKA: (1) The Trans-epicondylar Axis, (2) Perpendicular to the “Whiteside Line,” (3) Three to five degrees of external rotation off the posterior condyles, and (4) Rotation of the component to a point where there is a balanced symmetric flexion gap. This last method is the most logical and functionally, the most appropriate. Of interest is the fact that the other 3 methods often yield flexion gap symmetry, but the surgeon should not be wed to any one of these individual methods at the expense of an unbalanced knee in flexion. In correcting a varus knee, the knee is balanced first in extension by the appropriate medial release and then balanced in flexion by the appropriate rotation of the femoral component. In correcting a valgus knee, the knee can be balanced first in flexion by the femoral component rotation since balancing in extension almost never involves release of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) but rather release of the lateral retinaculum. If a rare LCL release is anticipated for extension balancing, then it would be performed prior to determining the femoral rotation since the release may open up the lateral flexion gap to a point where even more femoral component rotation is needed to close down that lateral gap. It is important to know and accept the fact that some knees will require internal rotation of the femoral component to yield flexion gap symmetry. The classic example of this is a knee that has previously undergone a valgus tibial osteotomy that has led to a valgus tibial joint line. In such a case, if any of the first 3 methods described above is utilised for femoral component rotation, it will lead to a knee that is very unbalanced in flexion being much tighter laterally than medially. A LCL release to open the lateral gap will be needed, increasing the complexity of the case. My experience has shown that intentional internal rotation of the femoral component when required is well-tolerated and rarely causes problems with patellar tracking. It is also of interest to note that mathematical calculations reveal that internally rotating a femoral component as much as 4 degrees will displace the trochlear groove no more that 2–3 mm (depending on the FC size), an amount easily compensated for by undersizing the patellar component and shifting it medially those few mm. There are basically 3 ways to determine the proper tibial component rotation during TKA: (1) Anatomically cap the tibial cut surface with an asymmetric tibial component, (2) Align the tibial rotation relative to a fixed anatomic tibial landmark (most surgeons use this method and align relative to the medial aspect of the tibial tubercle), (3) Rotate the tibial component to a point where there is rotational congruency in extension between the femoral and tibial articulating surfaces. This third method must be used with fixed bearing arthroplasties (especially with conforming articulations) to avoid rotational incongruency between the components during weight-bearing that can create abnormal and deleterious torsional forces on posterior stabilised posts, insert tray interfaces and bone-cement interfaces. Rotating platform articulations can tolerate rotational mismatch unless it is to a point where the polyethylene insert rotates excessively and causes symptomatic soft tissue impingement

Objective: To present our innovative surgical technique that simultaneously provides optimal femorotibial tracking and patellofemoral tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Material and methods: A total of 127 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty using new criteria for femoral, tibial and patellar preparation and placement of their respective components. The technique consisted of intraoperative determination of the rotation of the femoral and tibial components, lateralization of the femoral and tibial components and medialization of the patellar component, thus reducing the Q-angle. It provided excellent tracking of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints without retinacular release. Results: At a follow up of up to 3 years, 90% of patients gained up to 120 degrees of motion within first 6 months. Rest pain score [10-0] improved from 5.2 to 0.8. Activity pain score [10-0] improved from 9.0 to 2.0. Stair climbing [0–10] improved from 2.8 to 7.1. Walking score improved from 3.2 to 7.3. ADL function improved from 4.3 to 7.1. Our complications included 1 case of postoperative traumatic fracture of the patella, that healed spontaneously, 1 deep infection which responded well to open lavage, and 6 cases of delayed wound healing that required secondary closure. One patient died of unrelated cause. No fracture, loosening, component failure or instability was recorded. None of the implants required removal. Conclusion: Implementation of our 10 rules concept of surgical technique gave early excellent results, and we recommend it as a technique universally applicable in total knee arthroplasty

Introduction and Aims: Difficult primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with constrained knee systems is becoming more common. Modular systems are critical to success. A review of 457 consecutive cases with a single knee system for difficult primary and revision TKA provides an algorithm for good results. Method: Between July 1992 and December 2000, 457 consecutive TKA were performed at a single institution using a posterior-stabilised constrained (PSC) system. Ninety-seven cases were primary with ligamentous instability and 360 were revision cases with bone loss and instability. Sixty-two patients died during follow-up, seven were lost to follow-up. Results: Follow-up averaged 2.5 years. Pre-operative Knee Society (KSS) and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores averaged 47.3 and 60.0 respectively, and improved to 79.0 and 75.0 (p< 0.001). Range of motion improved significantly (p< 0.001). Incidence of manipulation was 9.4 percent. Infection necessitated debridement in 4.6 percent of cases. Extensor mechanism complications occurred in 2.2 percent. Excision of the patellar component without reinsertion was highest risk. There was a 2.2 percent aseptic loosening rate and 3.0 percent failure for instability. Conclusion: The authors describe an algorithm for long-term success using a PSC modular knee system based upon critical review of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Methods for achieving stability and fixation affect results. Appropriate augmentation for femoral and tibial deficits re-establishes the joint line and provides excellent range of motion. A step-wise approach to the patella provides durable results. Predictors of success including alignment, the joint line, managing bone loss, fixation, and extensor mechanism are reviewed

Objectives: We present the medium-term results of 453 primary, posterior cruciate retaining total knee replacements. Methods: We used the Genesis I prosthesis to 453 knee-joints between 1993–2001. The patients included were 386 (67 bilateral) with age between 58–87 years (aver. 68,5 yrs). The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 418 cases, rheumatoid arthritis in 21 cases, post-traumatic arthritis in 9 cases and osteoarhritis combined with rheumatoid disease in 5 cases. The knees flexion was ranged from 60° to 120° and the extension from 0° to 20°. In 423 cases a 5°–30° varus knee and in 31 cases a 5°–20° valgus knee was documented. The Genesis I knee prosthesis was used with cement, without patellar component implantation. The postoperative protocol included early weight bearing and follow up on the 3rd, 6th,12th month and every year. Results: The follow up period was ranged from 2 to 10 years (aver. 5,2 yrs). Superficial infection was noted in 5 patients with a satisfactory outcome, pneumonic embolism in 3 (1 death) and deep venous thrombosis in 7 patients. The clinical and radiological assessment followed the Knee Society standards. Postoperatively the flexion was ranged from 80° to 130° with full extension of the knees. The preoperative varus & valgus deformity was totally corrected. No signs of mechanical loosening were documented. No revision surgery was needed. All the patients are happy with a good level of every day activity. Conclusions: Our results eight years postoperatively are quite satisfactory (98%). All the prosthesis exhibit good behaviour and we believe that this type of prosthesis is a positive solution for the arthritis of the knee which needs surgical assessment

Rotational mal-alignment of the patella-femoral interface will result in increased wear. Highly cross-linked polyethylene will decrease wear even if mal-aligned. A biomechanical model based on high load and flexion was used to measure wear of rotationally aligned and mal-aligned all-polyethylene patellae. The components were articulated against “aligned” and “mal-aligned” (60 internally rotated) femoral components. The patella were subjected to a constant 2224 N force and the femoral components rotated from 600 to 1200 at 1.33 Hz. Patellae of identical geometry made of conventional UHMWPE and highly crosslinked UHMWPE were tested to 1 000 000 cycles. Wear was determined by gravimetric measurement relative to cemented soak controls. Conventional UHMWPE: All samples demonstrated damage (burnishing and scratching) of the articulating surfaces. There was a significant increase in wear (p< .05) in the mal-aligned patella. Highly cross-linked patellae: All components fractured in the mal-aligned construct (gamma irradiated remelted n=6, gamma irradiated and annealed n=2). Failure first occurred at the cement interface then at the posts. Correct femoral rotation is important during TKA. The intertrochlear line, tibial cut, epicondylar axis and posterior condyles are helpful landmarks, but there is still eyeball control of rotation. It is clear from this study that rotational mal-alignment will result in increased polyethylene wear. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has decreased wear in THA. Unfortunately, the decrease in ductility and toughness may make the use of these materials unsuitable for TKA. Based on this study model, patellar components would need to be redesigned if highly cross-linked polyethylene were to be applied. The wear rate of conventional UHMWPE patellae is increased by rotational mal-alignment. Highly cross-linked components were a poor solution to problem. Use of highly cross-linked polyethylene resulted in component fracture

This study evaluated the effect of prosthetic patellar resurfacing on outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty. One hundred and twenty-six patients who underwent consecutive revision of total knee arthroplasty were identified. The status of the patella was ascertained post revision as to the presence or absence of patellar prosthesis. WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 and patient satisfaction data were obtained at a minimum of two years follow-up. Follow-up was obtained in one hundred and ten patients. There was no significant difference between the two cohorts with regards to outcomes. A patellar prosthesis does not appear to significantly affect pain, function, or satisfaction outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of prosthetic patellar resurfacing on outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty in a matched cohort study. The presence or absence of a patellar prosthesis does not appear to significantly affect pain, function, or satisfaction outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty. Attempting to resurface the patella in revision cases may not be worthwhile. Follow-up was obtained in one hundred and ten patients (fifty-two with patellar component, fifty-eight bony shell), matched for age, sex and co-morbidity scores and followed for a minimum of two years. There was no significant difference between the two cohorts with regards to outcomes of WOMAC pain (mean seventy-two and sixty-five, p=0.17), WOMAC function (mean sixty-four and fifty-nine, p=0.26) scores, Oxford −12 (mean sixty-three and sixty-seven, p=0.2), SF-12 (mean forty and thirty-six, p=0.27) and satisfaction outcomes (mean eight and nine, p=0.07), (power of 0.8, beta=0.2). From January 1997 to December 1999 one hundred and twenty-six patients who underwent consecutive revision total knee arthroplasty were identified. The status of the patella was ascertained post revision as to the presence or absence of patellar prosthesis. At a minimum of two years follow-up, pain and function were assessed by questionnaire for WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 and patient satisfaction data. Co-morbidity, surgical exposure, HSS knee scores and ROM were also collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. It is questionable whether patient’s pain, function and satisfaction are affected in revision total knee arthroplasty by patellar prosthetic resurfacing. Funding: One or more of the authors has received funding from a commercial party. This was DePuy, Inc, Warsaw, IN

Many total knee replacements (TKR) are designed with more conforming articular geometry to increase the femoral contact area and decrease surface stresses. These designs are supported by studies suggesting that implants with coronally flat articular surfaces are vulnerable to medial-lateral lift-off and edge-loading on the polyethylene insert. However, few retrieved inserts from contemporary TKR’s have shown wear consistent with this loading mechanism. This study presents wear measurements from 37 consecutively retrieved polyethylene inserts of the same PCL-retaining design with coronally flat-on-flat articulations. If substantial edge-loading occurred in-vivo, it was hypothesise that wear would be located closer to the medial or lateral edge of the articular surface with a high incidence of delamination. Inserts were retrieved at autopsy (n=12) after 41 (15–74) months in-situ and at revision TKR (n=25) after 26 (1–71) months in-situ. Reason for revision was infection (28%), patellar component complications (24%), loosening (24%), patellar resurfacing (20%), and supra-condylar fracture (4%). Articular damage was measured using light microscopy and digitising the circumference of each damage region on calibrated images. Surface deformation was measured relative to unused control inserts using a hand-held digitising stylus. Wear patterns were not significantly different between autopsy or revision retrievals (ANOVA, p> 0.05). Articular wear covered 48%+16% and 47%+14% of the medial and lateral surfaces, respectively. The most frequent wear modes were burnishing and scratching. Delamination occurred on 4(11%) inserts, but involved < 2% of the articular surface. Wear patterns were internally rotated and centrally located. Not one insert had a wear area centroid located in the medial or lateral third of the articular surface. Surface deformations were greatest in the inserts’ central region and the linear deformation rate decreased with time. Concerns of high contact stresses associated with edge-loading were unsupported by these retrievals. Condylar lift-off, if it occurs, does not appear to substantially impact polyethylene damage in coronally flat-on-flat articulations

Aim: To assess the medium term survival and radiological outcome of primary cemented modular Freeman Samuelson total knee replacement at Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, UK. Material and methods: 115 patients (118 knees), who underwent primary cemented modular Freeman Samu-elson total knee replacement from 1991 to1998, were reviewed retrospectively. Proximal cementing technique was used ti fix the metal backed tibial implant. The follow-up x-rays were also reviewed and presence of osteolysis, aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear was noted. The Knee Society radiological evaluation was used to record the osteolysis and the WOMAC score was used to evaluate functional outcome. Results: The operation was performed for osteoarthritis (87), rheumatoid arthritis (23), psoriasis (4), Pagets disease (2), avascular necrosis (1) and gout (1). The average follow-up was 7.25 yrs (range 5–13 yrs). At the latest review 25 patients had died and 14 had undergone revision surgery. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear (3), osteolysis (3), infection (6), instability (1) and loosening of patellar component (1). Patella was resurfaced in 80 patients using press fit uncemented all-polyethylene component. Two patients with unreplaced patella underwent re-operation for patellar resurfacing due to anterior knee pain. Cumulative survival of the implant at 10 years was 93.4% for revision due to aseptic loosening or osteolysis and 86.8% for revision due to any cause. Radiolucent lines were observed in 22 patients. In 4 of these patients, the radiolucent lines were progressive and 3mm or more in size. Osteolytic lesions were seen in 10 patients. None of the patients with osteolysis or radiolucent lines were symptomatic. There was no statistical association between thickness of polyethylene and presence of osteolysis or occurrence of aseptic loosening (chi squared test). Conclusion: Freeman Samuelson knee replacement provided good and predictable medium term outcome in our patients with tricompartmental arthritis of knee. The results of uncemented press fit all-polyethylene patellar replacement were also excellent. However, the high incidence of osteolysis even though asymptomatic, at an average follow-up of 7.25 yrs is a matter of some concern. Proximal cementing technique may lead to increased incidence of osteolysis and should be avoided in the modular Freeman Samuelson total knee replacement

Aims: The most common complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the result of patellar complications. The causes of patellar problems range from sub-luxation, dislocation, component loosening, rupture of the patellar tendon, excess wear of the polyethylene (especially after metal backing), retropatellar pain, and patellar fracture. The incidence of these patellar complications after TKA ranges from 5–30%. Selective retention of the patella has been recommended more recently although there are still potential problems of maltracking and anterior knee pain. According to the nationwide registration of all TKAs in Finland since 1980 it seems evident that interest of patellar retention during the primary operation has now been stabilized at the level of about 55 per cent. At the same time there are, however, quite a high incidence of reoperations done due to patellar complications or later resurfacing of the patella in connection of revisions done with other indications. Methos:. Database of the Finnish Arthroplasty Register was evaluated from the years 1999 and 2000 focusing on the reoperations done either due to patellar complication (in the notiþcation: indication for revision) or due to other reason (to be speciþed in full text). These were further divided into three main categories: removal or fracture of patellae, delayed resurfacing due to patellar pain or maltracking, and component loosening. Conclusions: Reoperations done due to the patellar complications and/or later resurfacing of patellae mean quite a notable work-load; 31,7 to 33,6 per cent of all TKA revisions done in the years 1999 and 2000, respectively. Of the total of 113 delayed patellar resurfacing operations, almost 50 per cent were done in connection to revisions primarily due to other reasons, usually after excess liner wear. In conclusion we can say, that ÒprimaryÒ patellar complications (after patellar resurfacing in the primary operation) encountered about 15 per cent of all revisions, and those done in the Òsecondary phaseÒ (after retention of patella) another 15 to 16 per cent. This is in accordance with the results gained in the other Nordic Registers; in Norway ÒprimaryÒ/loose 16,5% of all TKA revisions. It seems that the need for a secondary patellar replacement in unreplaced cases was balanced by the need for revisions of failed patellar components in patellar replaced cases

Introduction and Aims: Mobile bearings have been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as a means to improve kinematics and reduce wear. Another theoretical advantage may be a reduction of the torsional and shear stresses at the baseplate – bone interface, and thereby improving the fixation of the tibial component. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the fixation of tibial components with fixed or mobile bearings in a prospective randomised study using RSA. Method: Fifty-two consecutive patients (31 women, 21 men, mean age 72) with knee osteoarthrosis underwent primary cemented total knee arthroplasty. Included were patients with arthrosis stage III–V and age over 62. Patients were randomised at operation by opening of sealed envelopes to either Mobile Bearing (MB) or Fixed Bearing (FB). The FB knees received a NexGen TKA with titanium tibial baseplate, and the MB knees a NexGen mobile bearing TKA with CrCo tibial baseplate. All components were cemented using vacuum-mixed Palacos-Gentamicin bone cement. The stem of the component was not cemented. Patellar components were not used. Each tibial baseplate was equipped with five tantalum markers on the undersurface by the manufacturer. The peri- and post-operative management was in all cases identical. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was performed three, 12, and 24 months post-op. Clinical results were assessed with Knee Society Knee and Function Scores. Results: There were no complications. One patient (MB) died two months after operation in myocardial infarction. The Knee Society Knee and Function scores and range of knee motion improved after surgery in both groups with no differences between the groups, reaching 89 at both 12 and 24 months. The rotations of the tibial baseplates did not differ significantly between the two groups. In both groups, anterior-posterior tilting was somewhat larger than varus-valgus tilting. Maximum subsidence was 0.3 ± 0.1 mm (MB) and 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (FB), and maximum migration was 0.6 ± 0.2 mm (MB) and 0.5 ± 0.1 mm (FB) (P = 0.3 – 0.4). Conclusion: This study could not detect any positive effects on the fixation of the cemented tibial baseplate when a mobile polyethylene insert was used. It may be that in cemented fixation the theoretical advantages of lower shearing and torsional forces at the interface are not important, at least during the initial 24 months post-op