Abstract
Introduction
We have been re-evaluating patellofemoral alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by using a weight- bearing axial radiographic view after detecting patellar maltracking (lateral tilt > 5° or lateral subluxation > 5 mm) on standard non-weight-bearing axial radiographs. However, it is unclear whether the patellar component shape affects this evaluation method. Therefore, we compared 2 differently shaped components on weight-bearing axial radiographs.
Methods
From 2004 to 2013, 408 TKAs were performed with the same type of posterior-stabilized total knee implant at our hospital. All patellae were resurfaced with an all-polyethylene, three-pegged component to restore original thickness. Regarding patellar component type, an 8-mm domed component was used when the patella was so thin that a 10-mm bone cut could not be performed. Otherwise, a 10-mm medialized patellar component was selected. Twenty-five knees of 25 patients, in whom patellar maltracking was noted on standard axial radiographs at the latest follow-up, were included in this study. Knees were divided into 2 groups: 15 knees received a medialized patella (group M) while 10 received a domed patella (group D). Weight-bearing axial radiographs with patients in the semi-squatting position were recorded with the method of Baldini et al. Patellar alignment (tilt and subluxation) was measured according to the method described by Gomes et al. using both standard and weight-bearing axial views.
Results
Patients’ demographic data, such as age at surgery, sex, and disease were similar for both groups. The average follow-up period was significantly longer in group D than group M (5.4 years vs. 2.5 years, respectively; p = 0.0045, Mann- Whitney U-test). The lateral tilt angle decreased significantly (p < 0.0001, paired t-test) from 6.5° ± 2.8° to 1.0° ± 1.2° with weight bearing in group M. However, this parameter in group D changed from 6.7° ± 2.7° to 4.7° ± 3.0° with weight bearing; the difference was not significant. Lateral subluxation also decreased significantly (p < 0.0001, paired t-test) from 5.1 mm ± 2.4 mm to 2.5 mm ± 1.4 mm with weight bearing in group M. However, that in group D changed from 2.8 mm ± 2.7 mm to 2.4 mm ± 2.8 mm with weight bearing, and the difference was not significant. On weight-bearing views, patellar maltracking was noted in 4 knees in group D but no knees in group M. The difference was significant (p = 0.017, Fisher's exact test). One of the 21 patients with adequate patellar tracking (4.8%) and 1 of 4 patients with maltracking (25%) complained of mild anterior knee pain.
Discussion
Patellar tracking on axial radiographic views improved better in group M than in group D with weight bearing. The patellofemoral contact area was maintained with a domed patella despite tilting, but not with a medialized patella. Our results indicate that the shape difference affected the degree of radiographic improvement. Thus, the weight-bearing axial radiographic view devised by Baldini et al. is useful for evaluating patellofemoral alignment after TKA, but the shape of the patellar component should be considered for result interpretation.
