Abstract
We report our experience with LCS Patellofemoral joint replacement. Between September 2003 and November 2007, 66 consecutive patients were reviewed retrospectively who underwent LCS patellofemoral joint replacement. There were 13 males and 51 females with a mean age of 61.6 years (range 43–78). The average follow-up was 22 months (range 11–51 months). To assess the outcome, revision for any cause was taken as the end point for this study.
A total of 14 (21.2%) revision operations were carried out at an average of 15.6 months (range 8–29 months) from the initial operation. The reasons for revision were mal-tracking of patella (3), dislocated patellar button (2), persistent unexplained pain (5) and progression of arthritis (4). Amongst the remaining 52 patients, 8 are still experiencing pain and not entirely satisfied with the procedure. 42 patients (63%) have a satisfactory outcome so far. All of them who underwent revision to a total knee replacement were satisfied with their outcome with relief in their symptoms. Revision to a total knee replacement is not a straightforward procedure, especially removing the metal backed patellar component.
The revision rate of over 21% is unacceptably high to recommend the procedure as a routine. Based on our experience, we conclude that LCS patellofemoral replacement should be used with caution.
Correspondence should be addressed to: BASK c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.
