Abstract
Persistent patellofemoral symptoms can cause patient dissatisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate patellar tracking and patient outcomes utilizing two implant designs in TKA.
Medical records and radiographs of two groups of 100 consecutive patients each were reviewed. All patients underwent posterior stabilized TKA by a single surgeon; using the same operative technique but two different implant designs (Group 1: Asymmetric femoral component with deep congruent trochlear groove and Group 2: Asymmetric femoral component with shallow trochlear groove). Data was collected on demographic characteristics, patellar tilt, displacement, prosthesis-bone angle, HSS Patella Score, Knee Society Knee and Function Score. Patellar tilt more than 5° was considered significant. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS v.16.0.3 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
Patients' age and sex were equivalent in the two groups (p>0.57). Median follow up was 2.2 years. Pre-operative incidence of patellar tilt was similar in both groups (18% vs. 17%). After surgery, these values changed to 30% and 77% respectively. This was statistically significant (p<0.001). The Knee Society Knee and Function Score improved significantly in both groups, however the improvement in the function score was significantly greater in the first group (p=0.001). The improvement in Knee Society Knee Score (50.24 and 48.08; p= 0.18) and post-operative HSS Score (93 vs. 91; p=0.19) were not statistically significant.
Our findings suggest that despite using the same operative technique, patellar tracking was significantly different between the two groups, a finding most likely attributable to the design of the femoral component. Whether the difference in patellar maltracking will affect long-term survival of the patellar component remains to be seen.
