Squeaking arising from a ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip replacement (THR) may cause patient concern and in some cases causes patients to seek revision surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence of squeaking and the incidence of revision surgery for squeaking. A total of 43 studies including 16 828 CoC THR that reported squeaking, or revision for squeaking, were entered into the analysis. The incidence of squeaking was 4.2% and the incidence of revision for squeaking was 0.2%. The incidence of squeaking in patients receiving the Accolade femoral stem was 8.3%, and the incidence of revision for squeaking in these patients was 1.3%. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:181–7

This multicentre study analysed 12 alumina ceramic-on-ceramic components retrieved from squeaking total hip replacements after a mean of 23 months in situ (11 to 61). The rates and patterns of wear seen in these squeaking hips were compared with those seen in matched controls using retrieval data from 33 ‘silent’ hip replacements with similar ceramic bearings. All 12 bearings showed evidence characteristic of edge-loading wear. The median rate of volumetric wear was 3.4 mm. 3. /year for the acetabular component, 2.9 mm. 3. /year on the femoral heads and 6.3 mm. 3. /year for head and insert combined. This was up to 45 times greater than that of previously reported silent ceramic-on-ceramic retrievals. The rate of wear seen in ceramic components revised for squeaking hips appears to be much greater than in that seen in retrievals from ‘silent’ hips.

We investigated factors that were thought to be associated with an increased incidence of squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. Between June 1997 and December 2008 the three senior authors implanted 2406 primary total hip replacements with a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surface. The mean follow-up was 10.6 years. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in each case, and no patient had undergone previous surgery to the hip. We identified 74 squeaking hips (73 patients) giving an incidence of 3.1% at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years (4.1 to 13.3). Taller, heavier and younger patients were significantly more likely to have hips that squeaked. Squeaking hips had a significantly higher range of post-operative internal (p = 0.001) and external rotation (p = 0.003) compared with silent hips. Patients with squeaking hips had significantly higher activity levels (p = 0.009). A squeaking hip was not associated with a significant difference in patient satisfaction (p = 0.24) or Harris hip score (p = 0.34). Four implant position factors enabled good prediction of squeaking. These were high acetabular component inclination, high femoral offset, lateralisation of the hip centre and either high or low acetabular component anteversion. This is the largest study to date to examine patient factors and implant position factors that predispose to squeaking of a ceramic-on-ceramic hip. The results suggest that factors which increase the mechanical forces across the hip joint and factors which increase the risk of neck-to-rim impingement, and therefore edge-loading, are those that predispose to squeaking

Objectives. Studies reporting specifically on squeaking in total hip arthroplasty have focused on cementless, and not on hybrid, fixation. We hypothesised that the cement mantle of the femur might have a damping effect on the sound transmitted through the metal stem. The objective of this study was to test the effect of cement on sound propagation along different stem designs and under different fixation conditions. Methods. An in vitro model for sound detection, composed of a mechanical suspension structure and a sound-registering electronic assembly, was designed. A pulse of sound in the audible range was propagated along bare stems and stems implanted in cadaveric bone femurs with and without cement. Two stems of different alloy and geometry were compared. Results. The magnitudes of the maximum amplitudes of the bare stem were in the range of 10.8 V to 11.8 V, whereas the amplitudes for the same stems with a cement mantle in a cadaveric bone decreased to 0.3 V to 0.7 V, implying a pulse-attenuation efficiency of greater than 97%. The same magnitude is close to 40% when the comparison is made against stems implanted in cadaveric bone femurs without cement. Conclusion. The in vitro model presented here has shown that the cement had a remarkable effect on sound attenuation and a strong energy absorption in cement mantle and bone. The visco-elastic properties of cement can contribute to the dissipation of vibro-acoustic energy, thus preventing hip prostheses from squeaking. This could explain, at least in part, the lack of reports of squeaking when hybrid fixation is used. Cite this article: F. J. Burgo, D. E. Mengelle, A. Ozols, C. Fernandez, C. M. Autorino. The damping effect of cement as a potential mitigation factor of squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:531–537. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.511.BJR-2016-0058.R1

Noise generation has been reported with ceramic-on-ceramic articulations in total hip replacement (THR). This study evaluated 208 consecutive Delta Motion THRs at a mean follow-up of 21 months (12 to 35). There were 141 women and 67 men with a mean age of 59 years (22 to 84). Patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically, and the incidence of noise was determined using a newly described assessment method. Noise production was examined against range of movement, ligamentous laxity, patient-reported outcome scores, activity level and orientation of the acetabular component. There were 143 silent hips (69%), 22 (11%) with noises other than squeaking, 17 (8%) with unreproducible squeaking and 26 (13%) with reproducible squeaking. Hips with reproducible squeaking had a greater mean range of movement (p < 0.001) and mean ligament laxity (p = 0.004), smaller median head size (p = 0.01) and decreased mean acetabular component inclination (p = 0.02) and anteversion angle (p = 0.02) compared with the other groups. There was no relationship between squeaking and age (p = 0.13), height (p = 0.263), weight (p = 0.333), body mass index (p = 0.643), gender (p = 0.07) or patient outcome score (p = 0.422). There were no revisions during follow-up. Despite the surprisingly high incidence of squeaking, all patients remain satisfied with their hip replacement. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:160–5

Aims. This study reports the mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using a monoblock acetabular component with a large-diameter head (LDH) ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing. Patients and Methods. Of the 276 hips (246 patients) included in this study, 264 (96%) were reviewed at a mean of 67 months (48 to 79) postoperatively. Procedures were performed with a mini posterior approach. Clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded at regular intervals. A noise assessment questionnaire was completed at last follow-up. Results. There were four re-operations (1%) including one early revision for insufficient primary fixation (0.4%). No hip dislocation was reported. The mean University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) score, SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were 6.6 (2 to 10), 52.8 (25.5 to 65.7), 53.0 (27.2 to 66.5), 7.7 (0 to 63), and 88.5 (23 to 100), respectively. No signs of loosening or osteolysis were observed on radiological review. The incidence of squeaking was 23% (n = 51/225). Squeaking was significantly associated with larger head diameter (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), higher SF-12 PCS (p < 0.001), and UCLA scores (p < 0.001). Squeaking did not affect patient satisfaction, with 100% of the squeaking hips satisfied with the surgery. Conclusion. LDH CoC THAs have demonstrated excellent functional outcomes at medium-term follow-up, with very low revision rate and no dislocations. The high incidence of squeaking did not affect patient satisfaction or function. LDH CoC with a monoblock acetabular component has the potential to provide long term implant survivorship with unrestricted activity, while avoiding implant impingement, liner fracture at insertion, and hip instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1434–41

Aims. Long-term clinical outcomes for ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings are encouraging. However, there is a risk of squeaking. Guidelines for the orientation of the acetabular component are defined from static imaging, but the position of the pelvis and thus the acetabular component during activities associated with edge-loading are likely to be very different from those measured when the patient is supine. We assessed the functional orientation of the acetabular component. Patients and Methods. A total of 18 patients with reproducible squeaking in their CoC hips during deep flexion were investigated with a control group of 36 non-squeaking CoC hips. The two groups were matched for the type of implant, the orientation of the acetabular component when supine, the size of the femoral head, ligament laxity, maximum hip flexion and body mass index. . Results. The mean functional anteversion of the acetabular component at the point when patients initiated rising from a seated position was significantly less in the squeaking group than in the control group, 8.1° (-10.5° to 36.0°) and 21.1° (-1.9° to 38.4°) respectively (p = 0.002). . Conclusion. The functional orientation of the acetabular component during activities associated with posterior edge-loading are different from those measured when supine due to patient-specific pelvic kinematics. Individuals with a large anterior pelvic tilt during deep flexion might be more susceptible to posterior edge-loading and squeaking as a consequence of a significant decrease in the functional anteversion of the acetabular component. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:910–16

Introduction and Objective. Ceramic on Ceramic bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) afford a low friction coefficient, low wear rates and extreme hardness. Significant complications include hip squeak, ceramic fracture and poor polyethylene performance in revision procedures due to imbedding of abrasive microscopic ceramic fragments. We report on the results of this bearing at a minimum of 10 years. Materials and Methods. A single-centre retrospective review of 449 THAs was performed. Primary outcome measures included aseptic revision and all-cause revision rates at a minimum of 10 years post operatively. Evaluation of functionality was performed with WOMAC and SF-36 scores which were performed pre-operatively and at intervals of 6 months, one year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years post operatively. Results. There was a 6.2% (n=28) all-cause and 5.3% (n=24) aseptic revision rate for ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty at minimum of 10 years with a mean time to revision 4.8 years (range 2 months − 11.6 years). Notably, there were 2 revisions for ceramic head fracture, one for ceramic liner fracture, 3 for aseptic loosening and 3 revisions for squeaking. Pain of unknown origin was the most common reason for revision. There was an improvement in postoperative WOMAC scores from a mean of 59.8 (range 15–95) pre-operatively to a mean of 15.6 (range 0–78) at 10 years. Conclusions. This study showed good functional outcomes but high revision rates for CoC THA at a minimum of 10 years. The role for CoC bearings in THA has been called into question in recent years and may continue to decline in popularity, even in younger patients. Further large scale studies are important to assess the long-term outcomes of this bearing surface

Explanations for “bearing” noise in ceramic-on-ceramic hips (COC) included stripe-wear formation and loss of lubrication leading to higher friction. However clinical and retrieval studies have clearly documented stripe wear in patients that did not have squeaking. Seldom highlighted has been the risk of metal-on-metal or metal-on-ceramic impingement present in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with metal and ceramic cup designs. The limitation in THA positioning studies has been (i) reliance on 2-dimensional radiographic images and (ii) patients lying supine on the examination table, thus not imaged in squeaking positions. We collected eleven squeaking COC cases for an EOS 3D-imaging functional study. Hip positions were documented in each patient's functional ‘squeaking’ posture using standard and 3-D EOS images for sitting, rising from a chair, hip extension in striding, and single-legged stance. EOS imaging documented for the 1st time that postural dysfunctions with potential impingements were demonstrable for each squeaking case. The 1st major insight in this study came from a female patient who complained of squeaking while walking in flat-soled shoes (Figs. 1a, b). She found that when wearing high-heeled shoes her hip stopped squeaking (Figs. 1c, d). Her lateral EOS view in standing position with heeled shoes revealed that the femoral stem had approximately 3o less hyper-extension compared to flat shoes (Figs. 1b, d, arrows #1,3). The three-dimensional ‘sky-view’ EOS reconstruction of pelvis and femurs (Fig. 2) showed that her femur was also more internally rotated when she wore heels. These subtle shifts in position changed her COC hip from one of squeaking to non-squeaking. A squeaking male patient observed similar postural effects while walking up his boat ramp but not going down the ramp. In both cases, the squeaking was a consequence of cup impinging on a metal femoral neck. Thus the primary cause of squeaking appeared to be hip impingement, i.e. repetitive subluxations that patients generally were not aware of. Another case is representative of situations due to atypical and subtle cup/stem mal-adjustments (Fig. 3); frontal pelvic-tilt, thoracolumbar scoliosis, with 1cm of femur lengthening and a significant increase of offset are observed. Also evident was the femoral-neck retroversion in both standing and sitting. Squeaking occurred when modification of the functional neck orientation occured in one-legged stance (Fig. 3c) or when climbing a stair (Fig. 3d). It was apparent in our EOS studies that patient functionality controlled whether squeaking occurred or not. Thus the new data indicated COC squeaking was a three-fold consequence of component positioning, spine and pelvic adaptions, and variations in patient posture. One limitation here is that our conclusions are based on a small sample of patients and may not be applicable to all. A consequence of such repetitive impingement can be cup rim damage and neck-notching, with release of metal debris. It is well documented that retrieved ceramic bearings are frequently stained black. Thus hip squeaking may likely result from (i) impingement and secondarily (ii) due to ingress of metal particles, and then (iii) producing a failure of lubrication. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Acetabular cup orientation has been shown to be a factor in edge-loading of a ceramic-on-ceramic THR bearing. Currently all recommended guidelines for cup orientation are defined from static measurements with the patient positioned supine. The objectives of this study are to investigate functional cup orientation and the incidence of edge-loading in ceramic hips using commercially available, dynamic musculoskeletal modelling software that simulates each patient performing activities associated with edge-loading. Methodology. Eighteen patients with reproducible squeaking in their ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties were recruited from a previous study investigating the incidence of noise in large-diameter ceramic bearings. All 18 patients had a Delta Motion acetabular component, with head sizes ranging from 40 – 48mm. All had a reproducible squeak during a deep flexion activity. A control group of thirty-six patients with Delta Motion bearings who had never experienced a squeak were recruited from the silent cohort of the same original study. They were matched to the squeaking group for implant type, acetabular cup orientation, ligament laxity, maximum hip flexion and BMI. All 54 patients were modelled performing two functional activities using the Optimized Ortho Postoperative Kinematics Simulation software. The software uses standard medical imaging to produce a patient-specific rigid body dynamics analysis of the subject performing a sit-to-stand task and a step-up with the contralateral leg, Fig 1. The software calculates the dynamic force at the replaced hip throughout the two activities and plots the bearing contact patch, using a Hertzian contact algorithm, as it traces across the articulating surface, Fig 2. As all the squeaking hips did so during deep flexion, the minimum posterior Contact Patch to Rim Distance (CPRD) can then be determined by calculating the smallest distance between the edge of the contact patch and the true rim of the ceramic liner, Fig 2. A negative posterior CPRD indicates posterior edge-loading. Results. The mean CPRD was significantly less in the squeaking group than the control group, −2.5mm and 2.9mm respectively, (p < 0.001), Fig 3. The mean pelvic tilt in the flexed seated position was 12.6° (range −13.5° to 30.3°) for the squeaking group and 5.1° (−9.8° to 26.4°) for the control group. Consequently, the mean functional cup anteversion at seat-off was significantly less in the squeaking group than the control group, 8.1° (−10.5° to 36.0°) and 21.1° (−1.9° to 38.4°) respectively (p < 0.001), Fig 3. There were 67% (12) of patients in the squeaking group that showed posterior edge-loading in the simulation compared to only 28% (10) in the control group that exhibited posterior edge-loading in the simulation. Conclusions. Acetabular cup orientation during activities associated with edge-loading are likely very different from those measured when supine. Patients with large anterior pelvic tilts during deep flexion activities might be more susceptible to posterior edge-loading and squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, as a consequence of a significant decrease in cup anteversion. If these patients can be identified preoperatively, cup orientation and bearing choice could be customised accordingly to accommodate these individual motion patterns

The April 2014 Hip & Pelvis Roundup. 360 . looks at: Recent arthroplasty and flight; whether that squeak could be a fracture; diagnosing early infected hip replacement; impaction grafting at a decade; whether squeaking is more common than previously thought; femoral offset associated with post THR outcomes; and periprosthetic fracture stabilisation

Introduction. Squeaking is a potential problem of all hard on hard bearings yet it has been less frequently reported in metal-on-metal hips. We compared a cohort of 11 squeaking metal-on-metal hip resurfacings to individually matched controls, assessing cup inclination and anteversion between the groups to look for any differences. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the patient records of 332 patients (387 hip resurfacings) who underwent hip resurfacing between December 1999 and Dec 2012. 11 hips in 11 patients were reported to squeak postoperatively. Each of these patients, except one, were matched by age, sex, BMI and implant to 3 controls. The final patient only had one control due to his high BMI. The latest post-operative radiographs of the squeaking group and controls were analysed using EBRA (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis, University of Innsbruck, Austria) software to evaluate cup inclination and anteversion. Results. Post- operative audible squeaking occurred in 11 out of 387 hips (2.84%). The mean follow up of the squeaking group was 88.6 months (19–131 months). The mean time to squeak was 11.3 months (3–22 months). 8 (73%) patients were male, 10 (91%) patients had a Birmingham hip resurfacing and 9 (82%) patients had an operation on the left hip. The mean inclination angle of the cups in the squeaking group was 48.4° (43.9°–55.4°) compared to 50° (37.8° −63°) in the control group. The mean anteversion of the cups in the squeaking group was 17.1°(6.3°–25.7°) compared to 14.6° (4.3° −33.5°) in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the cases and their controls for cup inclination (p = 0.36) or cup anteversion (p = 0.31). The mean head size in the squeaking group was smaller at 49.3 mm (46 mm-54 mm), compared to 51.4 mm (48 mm-54 mm) in the control group (p = 0.026). The mean cup size in the squeaking group was also smaller at 56.5 mm (54 mm-62 mm), compared to 57.9 mm (48 mm-60 mm) in the control group (p = 0.007). Overall, 4 (40%) male patients in the squeaking group had a head size less than 50 mm, compared to 0 (0%) in the control group. 3 (27%) patients with squeaking resurfacings underwent revision surgery. 1 (9%) at 72 month for a pseudotumour, 1 (9%) at 114 months for persistant squeaking and 1 (9%) at 117 months for a subtrochanteric fracture after a fall. Conclusions. No difference was found between the radiographic inclination or anteversion of squeaking metal-on-metal hip resurfacing cups compared to a control group. Male patients with squeaking hips were noted to have smaller head and cup sizes than their controls

INTRODUCTION. Squeaking after total hip replacement has been reported in up to 10% of patients. Some authors proposed that sound emissions from squeaking hips result from resonance of one or other or both of the metal parts and not the bearing surfaces. There is no reported in vitro study about the squeaking frequencies under lubricated regime. The goal of the study was to reproduce the squeaking in vitro under lubricated conditions, and to compare the in vitro frequencies to in vivo frequencies determined in a group of squeaking patients. The frequencies may help determining the responsible part of the noise. METHODS. Four patients, who underwent THR with a Ceramic-on-Ceramic THR (Trident(r), Stryker(r)) presented a squeaking noise. The noise was recorded and analysed with acoustic software (FMaster(r)). In-vitro 3 alumina ceramic (Biolox Forte Ceramtec(r)) 32 mm diameter (Ceramconcept(r)) components were tested using a PROSIM(r) hip friction simulator. The cup was positioned with a 75° abduction angle in order to achieve edge loading conditions. The backing and the cup liner were cut with a diamond saw, in order to avoid neck-head impingement and dislocation in case of high cup abduction angles (Figure1). The head was articulated ± 10° at 1 Hz with a load of 2.5kN for a duration of 300 cycles. The motion was along the edge. Tests were conducted under lubricated conditions with 25% bovine serum without and with the addition of a 3. rd. body alumina ceramic particle (200 μm thickness and 2 mm length). Before hand, engineering blue was used in order to analyze the contact area and to determine whether edge loading was achieved. RESULTS. Edge loading was obtained. In-vitro, no squeaking occurred under edge loading conditions. However, with the addition of an alumina ceramic 3. rd. body particle in the contact region squeaking was obtained at the beginning of the tests and stopped after ∼20 seconds (dominant frequency 2.6 kHz). In-vivo, recordings had a dominant frequency ranging between 2.2 and 2.4 kHz. DISCUSSION. For the first time, squeaking was reproduced in vitro under lubricated conditions. In-vitro noises followed edge loading and 3. rd. body particles and despite, the severe conditions, squeaking was intermittent and difficult to reproduce. However, squeaking is probably more difficult to reproduce because the cup was cut and the head was fixed in the simulator, preventing vibration to occur. Squeaking noises of a similar frequency were recorded in-vitro and in-vivo. The lower frequency of squeaking recorded in-vivo, demonstrates a potential damping effect of the soft tissues. Therefore, the squeaking in the patients was probably related to the bearing surfaces and modified lubrication conditions that may be due to edge loading. Varnum et al reported recently (3) that all the revised squeaking patients had a neck-cup impingement with metal 3. rd. body particles. These metallic wear particles may generate squeaking as shown in vitro. However, a larger cohort of squeaking patients is needed to confirm these results

The problem associated with ceramic on ceramic total hip replacement (THR) is audible noise. Squeaking is the most frequently documented sound. The incidence of squeaking has been reported to wide range from 0.7 to 20.9%. Nevertheless there is no study to investigate on incidence of noise in computer assisted THR with ceramic on ceramic bearing. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and risks factors associated with noise. We retrospectively reviewed 200 patients (202 hips) whom performed computer assisted THR (Orthopilot, B. Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany) with ceramic on ceramic bearing between March 2009 and August 2012. All procedures underwent uncemented THR with posterior approach by single surgeon. All hips implanted with PLASMACUP and EXIA femoral stem (B. Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany). All cases used BIOLOX DELTA (Ceramtec, AG, Plochingen, Germany) ceramic liner and head. The incidence and type of noise were interviewed by telephone using set of questionnaire. Patient's age, weight, height, body mass index, acetabular cup size, femoral offset size determined from medical record for comparing between silent hips and noisy hips. The acetabular inclination angle, acetabular anteversion angle, femoral offset, hip offset were reviewed to compare difference between silent hips and noisy hips. The audible noise was reported for 13 hips (6.44%). 5 patients (5 hips) reported click (2.47%) and 8 patients (8 hips) squeaked (3.97%). The mean time to first occurrence of click was 13.4 months and squeak was 7.4 months after surgery. Most common frequency of click was less than weekly (60%) and squeak was 1–4 times per week (50%). Most common activity associated with noise was bending; 40% in click and 75% in squeaking. No patients complained for pain or social problem. Moreover, no patient underwent any intervention for the noise. The noise had not self-resolved in any of the patients at last follow up. Age, weight, height and BMI showed no statistically significant difference between silent hips and click hips. In addition, there was also same result between silent hips and squeaking hips. Acetabular cup insert size and femoral offset stem size the results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between silent hips and click hips, also with squeaking hips. Acetabular inclination, angle acetabular anteversion angle, femoral offset, hip offset the results shown that only acetabular anteversion angle differed significantly between silent hips (19.94±7.78 degree) and squeaking hips (13.46±5.54 degree). The results can conclude that incidence of noise after ceramic on ceramic THR with navigation was 6.44 %. Squeaking incidence was 3.97% and click incidence was 2.47%. The only associated squeaking risk factor was cup anteversion angle. In this study, squeaking hip had cup anteversion angle significant less than silent hip

The use of hard-on-hard bearings, including ceramics peaked in the mid 2000's and has seen rapid decline since that time. Ceramics are not new to the market place but have had a 40 year history outside the U.S. The basis for renewed enthusiasm for ceramics included improved manufacturing, improved taper tolerances, higher strength, and lower wear. In spite of the major improvements concerns have been expressed with new generation ceramics by the experts and thought leaders in the field. The major concerns included complications related to modularity, continued problems with fracture and consequences of fracture, limited surgical options, and squeaking and impingement. The conclusion of one review article was that “although ceramics show promise as a lower wear articulation, manufacturing and design modifications and improvements will continue in an attempt to address the substantial concerns that persist”. Modifications have indeed occurred. The question is rather all of these concerns have been addressed and the answer is no. One proposed solution was a hybrid material of Alumina and Zirconia (Delta Ceramic). The advantages included higher strength, lower wear, more options and possibly less squeaking. Unfortunately the modest material improvements did not begin to overcome the obstacles to adopting this technology. High on this list is the problem with cost with the current health care environment unwilling to pay for expensive new technology that does not have proven value. A 2nd major issue is new technology must account for variability in surgeon performance in maximising margin for error. The medical legal environment is unforgiving of failure of new unproven options. Most of the old issues with ceramics have not been completely resolved. Delta Ceramic in particular, has increased cost with no demonstrated benefit. A major problem is there is no known problem with metal or ceramic against cross-linked polyethylene bearing in terms of wear or osteolysis in the 10–15 year time frame. Among all the bearing articulations, metal-on-cross-linked performs the best. The persistent vexing problems with ceramics include impingement, liner breakage, and squeaking. Ceramic components do not tolerate component malposition which increases wear and squeaking. The problem is that a substantial percentage of hip replacements are put in outside of the ideal radiographic zone even at specialty centers. Breakage continues to be a problem especially with liners. There is also a need for complete rim exposure for concentric placement with impaction of liners which makes ceramics less compatible with small incision surgery. The problem of squeaking has not been solved by Delta Ceramic. Originally a case report appeared in the literature of squeaking with Delta Ceramic. Since that time a large scale study has showed that only 69% of Delta Ceramic hips were silent with up to 13% being associated with reproducible squeaking. While a new generation of ceramics are better than the earlier generation and have lowered the fracture risk and increased intraoperative options, the current generation ceramics still provide far fewer options than a standard metal-on-cross-linked total hip. The current generation metal-on-cross-linked total hips have 10–15 year results that cannot be improved upon in terms of wear and osteolysis. Other unsolved problems include breaking, chipping and squeaking. Ceramic-on-ceramic is less tolerant of suboptimal position which leads to impingement, edge loading, and an increased incidence of squeaking. Until all of these problems are successfully addressed, ceramic-on-ceramic cannot be advocated for widespread use

At the present time, there is no bearing in total hip arthroplasty that a surgeon can present to a younger and/or more active patient as being the bearing that will necessarily last them a lifetime. This is the driver to offering alternative bearings (crosslinked polyethylene with either a CoCr or ceramic head, resurfacings, and ceramic-on-ceramic) to patients. Each of these bearings has pros and cons, and none has emerged as the clear victor in the ongoing debate. Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings have been available for decades. Earlier generation CoC bearings did encounter problems with rare fractures, however, with a greater understanding and improvement in the material, the fracture incidence has been significantly reduced. However, what has emerged in the past few years is an increasing reporting of significant squeaking. The incidence of squeaking, reported in the literature in various series, has varied from less than 1% to over 20%, depending on the definition used. The primary reasons that ceramic-on-ceramic is not truly the articulation of choice for younger patients are: 1) There is absolutely no evidence that this bearing has a lower revision rate. Data from the Australian joint registry actually shows that at 15 years it has a significantly increased rate of revision (7.2%) compared with using a highly crosslinked liner with either a ceramic (5.1%) or a CoCr (6.3%) head; 2) This bearing is by far the most costly bearing on the market. In 2017 with significant constraints on health care systems across the globe, this is a significant concern; 3) This bearing has unique complications including squeaking and both liner and head fracturing. While ceramic-on-ceramic can be considered a viable alternative bearing in total hip arthroplasty, it can be in no way considered the articulation of longevity for the younger patient

Introduction. One of the most common complications of ceramic on ceramic hip replacement is squeaking. The association of Accolade stem and Trident acetabular system has been reported to have squeaking incidence of up to 35,6%. There is doubt if this phenomenon occurs due to: the stem titanium alloy, the V40 femoral neck, the recessed liner of the trident cup or even the mal-seating of the trident insert on the cup. Objectives. Primary: The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence of squeaking in association with the use of Exeter stem and Trident ceramic acetabular system. Secondary: Analysis of the correlation of the cup abduction angle and squeaking. Methods. During the period from March 2004 to December 2008, two surgeons performed 87 total hip arthroplasties in 77 patients with use of a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing (Exeter stem, alumina head, Trident ceramic acetabular system). Seventy six patients (86 THA) were available for review after at least 18 months follow-up. The incidence of squeaking and other noises was analyzed. Cup abduction angle was measured. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine if a correlation existed between the cup abduction angle and squeaking. Results. The incidence of squeaking was 2,63% (2 patients). Both patients reported a “click” noise in hyperextension of the hip. The mean abduction angle was 44 degress (35–60), and 48 degrees (46 and 50) on the squeaking group. There was no statistically significant difference in the in the mean cup inclination between squeaky and quiet hips. Conclusion. The incidence of squeaking in association with the use of Exeter stem and Trident ceramic acetabular system was 2,63%. There was no correlation of the cup abduction angle and squeaking

Alumina ceramic-ceramic bearings have the benefit of very low wear and studies showing the complete absence of osteolysis during the first decade of close study. However, good results depend on several critical factors including surgical exposure, surgical technique, component placement, and choice of component design. The following abstract discusses our experience with several of these factors. Initially, there were concerns that the use of ceramic-ceramic bearings would lead to a higher incidence of hip dislocation since the bearings have fewer femoral head-length choices and the absence of lipped-liners. In our prospective study of 418 hips the incidence of hip dislocation at 1 to 10 year followup is 0.5% (2/418). This experience suggests that the use of alumina ceramic-ceramic bearings is not associated with an increased incidence of dislocation. More recently, concerns about squeaking of alumina ceramic-ceramic bearings have been reported, particularly from centers in the United States. To investigate this issue, we reviewed information on 1275 consecutive revision THAs and 1039 consecutive primary ceramic-ceramic THA that had been performed at two institutions between 1996 and 2007. To identify the influence of the implant design on the incidence of squeaking we divided the primary hips into three groups with group 1: flush mounted ceramic liner; group 2a: recessed ceramic liner mated with a stem made of TiAlV; and group 2b: recessed ceramic liner mated with a stem made of a beta titanium alloy comprised of 12% molybdenum, 6% Zirconium, and 2% Iron. Analysis of the 1275 revision hips revealed 5 alumina ceramic-ceramic hips in patients who complained of squeaking or grinding. All 5 hips were designs that included a ceramic liner that was recessed inside of an elevated metal rim. All 5 hips also demonstrated metallosis at the time of revision. In primary THA, Group 2b had statistically significantly more squeaking (9 of 118) than group 2a (10 of 321) which had statistically significantly more squeaking than group 1 (6 of 700). In addition, the severity of squeaking between the groups was qualitatively different. Patients in Group 2b who complained of squeaking would often experience squeaking frequently throughout the day and could be demonstrated in the physician’s office. By contrast, patients in Group 1 who noted squeaking stated that the hip squeaked once a day to once a year. No patient in Group 1 complained of frequent squeaking or could demonstrate squeaking in the physicians’ office. Further, joint fluid analysis from a patient in Group 2b who complained of squeaking revealed metal from both the femoral (Molybdenum) and acetabular (Aluminum) components. As reported in another abstract at this meeting, 10 year survivorship of flush-mounted alumina ceramic-ceramic THA is 98.4% (95% confidence interval 97.1–100%) and no patient in that prospective clinical studies demonstrated radiographic evidence of osteolysis or wear. These experiences demonstrate that THA using alumina ceramic-ceramic is extremely reliable with low revision and dislocation rates and an absence of osteolysis. Significant squeaking is not associated with flush-mounted alumina ceramic liners and is clearly associated with elevated metal rims and metallosis. Finally, squeaking is statistically significantly associated with femoral components made of a beta titanium alloy consisting of Titanium, Molybdenum, Aluminum, and Iron

Introduction: Squeaking after total hip replacement has been reported in up to 10% of patients. Some authors proposed that sound emissions from squeaking hips result from resonance of one or other or both of the metal parts and not the bearing surfaces. There is no reported in vitro study about the squeaking frequencies under lubricated regime. The goal of the study was to reproduce the squeaking in vitro under lubricated conditions, and to compare the in vitro frequencies to in vivo frequencies determined in a group of squeaking patients. The frequencies may help determining the responsible part of the noise. Methods: Four patients, who underwent THR with a Ceramic-on-Ceramic THR (Trident. ®. , Stryker. ®. ) presented a squeaking noise. The noise was recorded and analysed with acoustic software (FMaster. ®. ). In-vitro 3 alumina ceramic (Biolox Forte Ceramtec. ®. ) 32 mm diameter (Ceramconcept. ®. ) components were tested using a PROSIM. ®. hip friction simulator. The cup was positioned with a 75° abduction angle in order to achieve edge loading conditions. The backing and the cup liner were cut with a diamond saw, in order to avoid neck-head impingement and dislocation in case of high cup abduction angles. The head was articulated ± 10° at 1 Hz with a load of 2.5kN for a duration of 300 cycles. The motion was along the edge. Tests were conducted under lubricated conditions with 25% bovine serum without and with the addition of a 3rd body alumina ceramic particle (200 μm thickness and 2 mm length). Results: Edge loading was obtained incompletely. In-vitro, no squeaking occurred under edge loading conditions. However, with the addition of an alumina ceramic 3rd body particle in the contact region, squeaking was obtained at the beginning of the tests and stopped after ~20 seconds (dominant frequency 2.6 kHz). In-vivo, recordings had a dominant frequency ranging between 2.2 and 2.4 kHz. Discussion: For the first time, squeaking was reproduced in vitro under lubricated conditions. In-vitro noises followed edge loading and 3rd body particles and despite, the severe conditions, squeaking was intermittent and difficult to reproduce. However, squeaking is probably more difficult to reproduce because the cup was cut and the head was fixed in the simulator, preventing vibration to occur. Squeaking noises of a similar frequency were recorded in-vitro and in-vivo. The lower frequency of squeaking recorded in-vivo, demonstrates a potential damping effect of the soft tissues. Therefore, the squeaking in the patients was probably related to the bearing surfaces and modified lubrication conditions that may be due to edge loading. The determined values of frequencies may help to analyze the squeaking patients in order to determine the mechanism generating the sound

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) can produce articular noise during the normal activities, generating discomfort to the patient. THA noise has to be investigated also as a potential predictor and a clinical sign of prosthetic failure. An observational study has been carried out to characterize the noise in CoC cementless THA, and to analyze the related factors. A total of 46 patients with noisy hip have been enrolled in 38 months, within the follow-up protocol normally applied for the early diagnosis of ceramic liner fracture [1]. Noise recording was based on a high-quality audible recorder (mod. LS 3, Olympus, Japan) and a portable ultrasonic transducer (mod USB AE 1ch, PAC, USA). The sensors for noise recording were applied to the hip of the patient during a sequence of repeatable motorial activities (forward and backward walking, squat, sit in a chair, flexion and extension of the leg). Sessions were also video-recorded to associate the noise emission to the specific movements. Each noise event was initially identified by the operator and therefore classified by comparison to the spectral characteristics (duration, intensity and frequency) of the main noise types. Number and spectral characteristics of noise events were obtained and correlated to the factors describing the clinical status of the patient, the surgical approach, the prosthetic device implanted. The study investigated also the noise as a sign of implant failure, by comparison with the total number of implants failed in the cohort during the study. We observed three types of noise with the main spectral characteristics in agreement to the literature: clicking, squeaking and popping. Among the identified types of noise, squeaking showed the longest duration and the highest amplitude. The 63% of hip presented the emission of just one type of noise, while the remaining a mix of types. The movement with the highest presence of noise was walking, followed by squat. Correlation was found between the noise type and the dimension of the ceramic head (p<0.001), with the sizes of 32 mm more affected by squeaking that the smaller one. Squeaking appeared before during the follow-up than the other types of noise. The 35% (16/46) of the noisy hips were revised during the study. Among the revised hips, the 81% (13/16) were affected by impingement and/or severe damage of the prosthetic components. The antiversion of the cup (p=0.008), the presence of debris in the synovial fluid (p=0.021) and the average frequency of squeaking (p=0.006) were significant predictors for the revision, but it has to be mentioned that the squeaking data was obtained on a small subset of revised patients. Ultrasonic analysis did not show significant correlations. The study presented and validated an experimental procedure to analyze noisy hips in clinical trials. Noise is confirmed to be a significant parameter in the follow-up evaluation of ceramic THA

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in hip replacement have low rates of wear and are increasingly being used in young adults. Our aim was to determine the incidence of audible phenomena or other bearing-related complications. We retrospectively analysed 250 ceramic-on-ceramic hip replacements in 224 patients which had been implanted between April 2000 and December 2007. The mean age of the patients at operation was 44 years (14 to 83) and all the operations were performed using the same surgical technique at a single centre. At a mean follow-up of 59 months (24 to 94), the mean Oxford hip score was 40.89 (11 to 48). There were six revisions, three of which were for impingement-related complications. No patient reported squeaking, but six described grinding or clicking, which was usually associated with deep flexion. No radiological evidence of osteolysis or migration of the components was observed in any hip. The early to mid-term results of contemporary ceramic-on-ceramic hip replacement show promising results with few concerns in terms of noise and squeaking. Positioning of the acetabular component remains critical in regard to the reduction of other impingement-related complications

Background: Squeaking in hip arthroplasty is a phenomenon that was described decades ago, but has only been brought back to attention recently. It occurs predominantly in ceramic on ceramic bearings, and has a reported incidence from less than 1% to 21%. The cause and the implication of squeaking are still unknown and many factors have been suggested to contribute. This study has looked into the patient factors to investigate if any clinical features are associated with an increased risk of squeaking. Methods: All primary total hip arthroplasties with ceramic on ceramic bearing that were performed at our unit were reviewed and all squeaking hips presented are included in the study. Patient demographics and clinical outcome data were analysed and compared with matched controls from the silent hips. Results: Between 1997 and 2008, 3375 primary hip arthroplasties in 3182 patients with ceramic on ceramic bearing were performed in our unit. Seventy one hips (2.1%) presented with squeaking on direct questioning and self reporting. Those patients were found to be taller, heavier and younger. They also have a significantly higher post-operative range of hip motion and higher Harris hip score when compared to matched controls. There was no difference in the satisfaction score. Only 4 patients (5.6%) presented with pain as well as squeaking, and 2 (2.8%) resulted in revision surgery for problematic squeaking. Conclusions: We present the largest series of squeaking primary hip arthroplasties with ceramic on ceramic bearing to date. A number of patient factors were found to be associated with squeaking. The taller, heavier and younger patients with more flexible and functional hips were at a higher risk, presumably because these patients put greater mechanical demands on their hips. Majority of the patients with squeaking are pain free and there is only a small risk of requiring revision surgery

Polyimide (MP-1, MMATech, Haifa, Israel), is a high performance aerospace thermoplastic used for its lubricity, stability, inertness and radiation resistance. A wear resistant thin robust bearing is needed for total hip arthroplasty (THR). After independent laboratory testing, in 2006, the author used the material as a bearing in two Reflection (Smith and Nephew, USA) hip surgeries. The first, a revision for polyethylene wear, survives with no evidence of wear, noise, new osteolysis or complications related to the MP-1 bearing after 16 yrs. The second donated his asymptomatic MP-1 hip at 6.5yrs for post-mortem examination. There were no osteoclasts, cellular reaction bland in contrast to that of polyethylene. In 2013 a clinical study with ethical committee approval was started using a Biolox Delta (Ceramtec, Germany) head against a polyimide liner in 97 patients. MMATech sold all liners, irradiated: steam 52:45. Sixteen were re-machined in New Zealand. Acetabular shells were Delta PF (LIMA, Italy). The liner locked by taper. The cohort consisted of 46:51 M:F, and ages 43 to 85, mean 65. Ten received cemented stems. For contralateral surgery, a ceramic or polyethylene liner was used. Initial patients were lower demand, later, more active patients, mountain-biking and running. All patients have on-going follow up, including MP-1 liner revision cases. There has been no measurable wear, or osteolysis around the acetabular components using weight-bearing radiographs. Squeaking within the first 6 weeks was noted in 39 number of cases and subtle increase in palpable friction, (passive rotation at 50 degrees flexion), but then disappeared. There were 6 revisions, four of which were related to cementless Stemsys implants (Evolutis, Italy) fixed distally with proximal linear lucencies in Gruen zones 1 and 7, and 2 and 6. No shells were revised and MP-1 liners were routinely changed to ceramic or polyethylene. The liners showed no head contact at the apex, with highly polished contact areas. There were no deep or superficial infections, but one traumatic anterior dislocation at 7 years associated with 5 mm subsidence of a non-collared stem. The initial squeaking and increased friction was due to the engineering of the liner / shell composite as implanted, not allowing adequate clearance for fluid film lubrication and contributed to by shell distortion during impaction. The revised bearings were “equatorial” rather than polar, and with lack of wear or creep this never fully resolved. Where the clearance was better, function was normal. The “slow” utilization was due to my ongoing concern with clearances not being correct. The revision of 4 Stemsys stems, tribology issues may have contributed, but non “MP-1” / Stemsys combinations outside this study have shown the same response, thought to be due to de-bonding of the hydroxyapatite coating. With correct engineering and clearances, a 3.6 mm thick MP-1 bearing, a surface Ra<0.5, steam sterilized, shows no appreciable wear, and with confidence, can be used as a high performance THR bearing

Squeaking in ceramic on ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty is well documented but its aetiology is poorly understood. In this study we have undertaken an acoustic analysis of the squeaking sound recorded from 31 ceramic on ceramic bearing hips. The frequencies of these sounds were compared with in vitro acoustic analysis of the component parts of the total hip implant. Analysis of the sounds produced by squeaking hip replacements and comparison of the frequencies of these sounds with the natural frequency of the component parts of the hip replacements indicates that the squeaking sound is due to a friction driven forced vibration resulting in resonance of one or both of the metal components of the implant. Finite element analysis of edge loading of the prostheses shows that there is a stiffness incompatibility between the acetabular shell and the liner. The shell tends to deform, uncoupling the shell-liner taper system. As a result the liner tends to tilt out of the acetabular shell and slide against the acetabular shell adjacent to the applied load. The amount of sliding varied from 4–40μm. In vitro acoustic and finite element analysis of the component parts of a total hip replacement compared with in vivo acoustic analysis of squeaking hips indicate that either the acetabular shell or the femoral stem can act as an “oscillator’ in a forced vibration system and thus emit a squeak. Introduction: Squeaking has long been recognized as a complication in hip arthroplasty. It was first reported in the Judet acrylic hemiarthroplasty. 1. It was the squeak of a Judet prosthesis that led John Charnley to investigate friction and lubrication of normal and artificial joints which ultimately led to the concept of low friction arthroplasty. Ceramic on ceramic bearings were pioneered by Boutin in France during the 1970’s, but experienced unacceptably high fracture rates. Charnley demonstrated in vitro squeaking when he tested one of Boutin’s ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in his pendulum friction comparator. 2. Squeaking has also been reported in other hard on hard bearings, and can also occur after polyethylene bearing surface failure resulting in articulation between metal on metal or ceramic on metal surfaces. 3–6. Recently, squeaking has been increasingly reported in modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in hip arthroplasty. However, although well-documented, the aetiology of squeaking in ceramic on ceramic bearings is still poorly understood. The incidence ranges from under 1% to 10%. 7–10. It has been reported in mismatched ceramic couples,11and after ceramic liner fracture. 12,13. An increased risk of squeaking has been demonstrated with acetabular component malposition, as well as in younger, heavier and taller patients. 9. However, it may also occur in properly matched ceramic bearings with ideal acetabular component position and in the absence of neck to rim impingement. 7–9. In rare cases, the squeak is not tolerated by the patient and has prompted a revision. Under ideal conditions hard-on-hard bearings are assumed to be operating under conditions of fluid film lubrication with very low friction. 14,15. However, if fluid film lubrication breaks down leading to dry sliding contact there will be a dramatic increase in friction. If this increased friction provides more energy to the system than it can dissipate, instabilities may develop in the form of friction induced vibrations and sound radiation. 16. Friction induced vibrations are a special case of forced vibration, where the frequency of the resulting vibration is determined by the natural frequency of the component parts. Running a moistened finger around the rim of a wine glass is an example of this. [Appendix]. The hypothesis of this study is that the squeaking sound that occurs in ceramic on ceramic hip replacement is the result of a forced vibration. This forced vibration can be broken down into a driving force and a resultant dynamic response. 17. The driving force is a frictional driving force and occurs when there is a loss of fluid film lubrication resulting in a high friction force. 14,15,18. The dynamic response is a vibration of a part of the device (the oscillator) at a frequency that is influenced by the natural frequency of the part. 16. By analyzing the frequencies of the sound produced by squeaking hip replacements and comparing them to the natural frequency of the component parts of a hip replacement this study aims to determine which part produces the sound. Materials and methods: In vitro determination of the natural frequencies of implant components Modal analysis has suggested that resonance of the ceramic components would occur only at frequencies above the human audible range and that resonance of the metal parts would occur at frequencies within the human audible range. Furthermore, that resonance of the combined ceramic insert and titanium shell would not be within the human audible range. To test this hypothesis we performed a simple acoustic analysis. The natural frequency of hip replacement components was determined experimentally using an impulse-excitation method (Grindo-sonic). Components were placed on a soft foam mat in a quiet environment and struck with a wooden mallet. The sound emitted from the component was recorded on a personal computer with an external microphone with a frequency response which ranges from 50Hz to 18,000Hz (Beyerdynamic MCE87, Heilbronn, Ger-many). The computer has an integrated sound card with a frequency response from 20Hz to 24kHz (SoundMAX integrated digital audio chip, Analogue Devices Inc, Norwood, M.A.) and we used a codec with a frequency response from 20Hz to 20kHz (Audio Codec ’97, Intel, Santa Clara, CA). Sound files were captured as 16 bit mono files at a sample rate of 48000Hz using acoustic analysis software (Adobe Audition 1.5, Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, California, USA). We performed fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the sound using FFT size 1024 with a Blackmann-Harris window to detect the frequency components of the emitted sound. (Fast Fourier transform is an accepted and efficient algorithm which enables construction of a frequency spectrum of digitized sound). We tested the following components: modular ceramic/titanium acetabular components, which included testing the titanium shell and the respective ceramic inserts both assembled according to the manufacturer’s instructions and unassembled; titanium femoral stems and ceramic femoral heads both assembled and unassembled. A range of sizes of each component was tested according to availability from our retrieval collection. In vivo acoustic analysis: Sound recordings were collected from 31 patients. Nineteen recordings were made at our institution: 16 of these were video and audio recordings and 3 were audio only recordings. Video recording was with a digital video camera recorder (Sony DCR-DVD101E Sony Electronics, San Diego, CA, USA) with the same external microphone used in the in vitro analysis. For 3 patients who could not reproduce the sound in the office we lent them a digital sound recorder for them to take home and record the sound when it occurred (Sony ICD-MX20, Sony Electronics, San Diego, CA, USA). This device has a In vivo acoustic frequency range from 60Hz to 13,500Hz. The remainder of the recordings were video and audio recordings made by surgeons at three other institutions on digital video camera recorders. Sound files were captured and analyzed by the same method used in the in vitro analysis. Each recording was previewed in the spectral view mode which allows easy visual identification of the squeak in the sound recording. In addition all sound recordings were played, listening for the squeak. Once a squeak was identified a fast Fourier transform (FFT) was performed. We used FFT size 1024 with a Blackmann-Harris window which allowed us to easily pick out the major frequency components. All prominent frequency components were recorded at the beginning of the squeak and at several time points during the squeak if there was any change. A range was recorded for the fundamental frequency component. We were able to determine the frequency range of the recording device used by observing the frequency range of the background noise on the recording. We found that if a squeak was audible on the recording we had no difficulty determining its frequency regardless of the quality of the device used to make the recording or the amount of background noise. The mean age of the patients was 54 years (23 to 79 years), mean height was 171cm (152 to 186cm) and mean weight was 79kg (52 to 111kg). There were 17 female and 14 male patients. There were nineteen ABGII stem and ABGII cup combinations, 10 accolade stem and trident cup, 1 Exeter stem and trident cup and 1 Osteonics Securfit stem with an Osteonics cup. Ethics committee approval was obtained for this project from our institution and from the referring institutions and informed consent was gained from the patients. Finite element analysis of edge loading: Edge-loading wear which may provide a mechanism for failure of fluid film lubrication and may therefore play a role in squeaking. To evaluate edge loading further we conducted finite-element analysis (FEA). 9. Computed tomography (CT) scans of an intact pelvis were obtained from visual human data set (VHD, NLM, Bethesda, Maryland). Slices were taken at 1mm thick with no inter-slice distance through the entire pelvis. The CT files were then read into a contour extraction program and saved into an IGES file format which was imported into PATRAN (MSC Software, Los Angeles, CA) to develop the pelvic geometry. The pelvis was meshed with 10 noded modified tetrahedral elements. The model was reconstructed with a 54mm titanium alloy generic acetabular shell and a 28mm alumina ceramic liner. The acetabular shell and ceramic liner were meshed using 8 noded hexahedral elements. The shell-liner modular taper junction incorporated an 18° angle. The implant contact conditions (Lagrangian multiplier) allowed the liner and shell to slide with a friction coefficient of 0.9. Tied contact conditions were applied between the generic acetabular shell and the bone representing bone ongrowth. Bone material properties were extracted from the CT files by taking the Hounsfield value and the coordinates and mapping to the element in the model allowing us to calculate the Young’s modulus for each element . 19. Material properties for the shell and liner were based on published values. 20. for titanium alloy and alumina ceramic

Squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) hips is a clinical phenomenon that is concerning with regard to the long term performance of these joint devices. Investigations into the cause of the squeaking have focused on patient factors and demographics, surgical placement, and other non-ceramic components in the devices. The current study tests latest-generation CoC devices to measure the vibration modes and frequencies of the components individually as well as assembled in the complete surgical construct. Audio data from clinical cases of squeaking hips were analysed to determine the frequencies present. Retrieved CoC hips (n = 7) and never-implanted CoC bearing couples (n = 3) were tested in the laboratory for squeaking under loaded articulation. Bovine serum was introduced into the CoC articulation and dried to promote stick-slip motion at the articulation. Squeaking sounds from the in vitro tests were recorded for audio analysis. Low mass, high frequency-response ceramic shear piezoelectric accelerometers (PCB Piezotronics) were adhered to the hip components along multiple axes to measure vibrations during testing. Clinical audio shows that squeaking occurs at fundamental frequencies in the range of 1 to 3 kHz, with harmonics above the fundamental frequency. Retrieved CoC bearing couples squeaked at fundamental frequencies from 1.5 kHz to 3.8 kHz. Fourier Transform analysis of the audio closely matched the concurrent output from the accelerometers mounted directly on the ceramic components. This held true even in the absence of metal components in the system. With metal components included in the test construct (acetabular shell, acetabular cup, femoral stem), those components also vibrated at the same frequencies as the ceramic bearing couples, indicating that the CoC articulation is the source of the vibrations, with metal components conducting and emanating the sound. The never-implanted bearing couples were made to squeak and vibrated at fundamental frequencies ranging from 1 kHz to 8 kHz. Squeaking from CoC hips can be reproduced in the lab using components from clinical retrievals. Instrumentation of the explanted hips confirms that the vibration frequencies of the ceramic components themselves match the audible squeaking. The squeaking of ceramic components mounted with soft polymers and with no metal contact at any point indicates that the ceramic components themselves are the source of the clinical squeaking. The measured vibration of ceramic components in the audible range is an observation not predicted by modeling studies reported in the literature to date

Introduction. The Delta Motion device (developed by Finsbury Orthopaedics, Leatherhead, United Kingdom, now manufactured by DePuy, Leeds, United Kingdom) is a pre-assembled factory fitted cup. It has been introduced to overcome some of the concerns relating to intra-operative assembly with improper seating of the liner and chipping. This device has a thinner shell and liner in comparison with other cups, allowing the use of larger sized heads which should help reduce the risk of impingement and dislocation. A drawback of the pre-assembled design is the inability to use supplementary screws to achieve stability and the difficulty in obtaining primary stability compared with a thin titanium shell. To date we are not aware of any publications reviewing the outcomes of these devices. Methods. 206 DeltaMotion cups were implanted in 195 patients, between Dec 2008 to Dec 2009 by the three senior authors. All the hips had the same stem (Osteonics) and a ceramic head was used. Data was prospectively collected and we reflect on our two year results. Results. A total of 206 cups (123 F: 83 M) were implanted in 195 patients. The mean age at implantation was 69 years (range 38–93). 11 patients had bilateral hips (6M:5F). Complications were 1 pulmonary embolism, 2 femoral stem subsidence, 1 dislocation, 2 femoral fractures, 13 squeaking hips (9F:4M). The squeaking hips had a mean age of 65 years. Discussion. The main complication was ‘benign’ squeaking. This was more common in younger (mean age 64 years) females. This cohort has a squeaking rate of 6.3% which is higher than 3.1% previously reported by our unit. There was no squeaking when 36 mm heads were used. The risk of squeaking dramatically increased when cup sizes 60 mm and above were used with 48 mm heads. Although squeaking seems to have increased with this device, none of the patients required revision

Squeaking in ceramic total hip joint replacements has become a controversial topic. This study aims to document the incidence of squeaking and other noise generation in a single surgeon series for ceramic on ceramic total hip joint replacements. Possible aetiological for squeaking causes are explored. All patients from public and private who received ceramic on ceramic total hip joint replacements (Stryker trident-accolade) from 2002 to 2007 were identified via the New Zealand Joint registry. Following ethics approval all patients were contacted for a phone interview to question as to whether they had noted any noise generation. Patients who demonstrated noise generation were reviewed in clinic for full history and examination. Data including age, sex, weight, primary diagnosis, head size and cup size were obtained from clinical notes. Post operative x-rays were reviewed to analyse cup abduction and version. Forty one ceramic total hip joint replacements in a total of thirty seven patients were reviewed via telephone interviews. Three patients complained of squeaking in the ceramic bearing while one patient complained of a grinding and one other of clicking. Two of the three who had recognised the squeaking were both able to reproduce the squeaking in the clinic room. The third patient was noted to have crepitus from anterior patello-femoral osteoarthritis. There was no statistical difference in age, weight, primary diagnosis or head size. In terms of abduction and version of the acetabular cups that squeaked, one had twenty seven degrees of ante-version and forty seven degrees of abduction and the other fifteen degrees of anteversion and thirty degrees of anteversion. Four cups lay outside the recommended fifteen-thirty five degrees of anteversion and thirty five-fifty five degrees of abduction yet showed no squeaking. Neither patient is troubled by the squeaking and neither would seek revision surgery. The incidence of squeaking in ceramic on ceramic total hip joint replacements appears to be around five percent with a similar number of patients experiencing other noises. The position of the acetabular cup does not appear to be the sole contributor to the noise and other aetiological causes need to be further investigated

At the present time, there is no bearing in total hip arthroplasty that a surgeon can present to a younger and/or more active patient as being the bearing that will necessarily last them a lifetime. This is the driver to offering alternative bearings (crosslinked polyethylene with either a CoCr or ceramic head, resurfacings, and ceramic-on-ceramic) to patients. Each of these bearings has pros and cons, and none has emerged as the clear victor in the ongoing debate. Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC) bearings have been available for decades. Earlier generation CoC bearings did encounter problems with rare fractures, however, with a greater understanding and improvement in the material, the fracture incidence has been significantly reduced. However, what has emerged in the past few years is an increasing reporting of significant squeaking. The incidence of squeaking, reported in the literature in various series, has varied from less than 1% to over 20%, depending on the definition used. The primary reasons that Ceramic-on-Ceramic is not truly the articulation of choice for younger patients are:. 1). There is absolutely no evidence that this bearing has a lower revision rate. Data from the Australian joint registry actually shows that at 15 years it has a significantly increased rate of revision (7.2%) compared with using a highly crosslinked liner with either a ceramic (5.1%) or a CoCr (6.3%) head. 2). This bearing is by far the most costly bearing on the market. In 2017 with significant constraints on health care systems across the globe, this is a significant concern. 3). This bearing has unique complications including squeaking and both liner and head fracturing. While Ceramic-on-Ceramic can be considered a viable alternative bearing in total hip arthroplasty, it can be in no way considered the articulation of longevity for the younger patient

Hip arthroplasty surgeons have various bearing choices to make on behalf of their patients. We make those choices based on our knowledge of pre-clinical wear testing data and the outcome of clinical and radiological follow-up studies. The initial use of conventional polyethylene revealed limitations in its use in younger patients. Modern highly crosslinked polyethylene is a vastly improved bearing surface that means less wear and its consequences. Despite this, registry data still suggests that loosening, lysis and dislocation are problematic causes of implant failure. The functional success of hip replacement surgery, the ageing population and younger patients requesting arthroplasty means we should predict ongoing issues consequent to wear related events even with the newer polyethylenes. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings surfaces have a long history of successful clinical use. The benefits of ceramic bearings are its superior wear characteristics, the minimal biological response to the ceramic wear products and the ability of ceramics to be offered in larger head sizes. Its limitations have been reports of fracture and squeaking. Fourth generation ceramic articulations have reduced the fracture incidence. Squeaking has been reported to occur in 3% to 20% in different series but revision for squeaking is extremely, low suggesting it is not a significant clinical problem. Edge loading occurs in most hip articulations and is thought to be the primary mechanism in the squeaking event. Modern methodologies of “functional” implant orientation may reduce the incidence of squeaking. While wear and its consequences remain significant issues in hip arthroplasty, the future will require a bearing with reduced wear and biologically inert wear products. This bearing exists already. “The future is now”

Previous clinical studies have documented the incidence of squeaking in subjects having a ceramic-onceramic (COC) THA. An in vivo sound sensor was recently developed used to capture sound at the THA interface. In this first study, it was determined that subjects having all bearing surface types demonstrated variable sounds. Therefore, in this follow-up study, the overall objective was to simultaneously capture in vivo sound and motion of the femoral head within the acetabular cup during weight-bearing activities for subjects implanted with one of four different ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) THA. Twenty subjects, each implanted with one of four types of Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA (9 Smith and Nephew, 8 Stryker, 2 Wright Medical Technologies and 1 Encore) were analyzed under in vivo, weightbearing conditions using video fluoroscopy and a sound sensor while performing gait on a treadmill. Patients were pre-screened and two groups were defined: a group diagnosed as audible squeakers (9 THAs) and a control group of THA patients not experiencing audible sounds (11 THAs). Two tri-axial piezoelectric accelerometers were attached to the pelvis and the femoral bone prominences respectively. The sensors detect frequencies propagating through the hip joint interaction. Also, 3D kinematics of the hip joint was determined, with the help of a previously published 2D-to-3D registration technique. In vivo sound was then correlated to 3D in vivo kinematics to determine if positioning of the femoral head within the acetabular cup is an influencing factor. For the audible group, two had a Smith and Nephew (S& N) THA, six a Stryker THA and one a Wright Medical (WMT) THA. Both of the S& N subjects, 5/6 Stryker and the Wright Medical subjects experienced femoral head separation. The maximum separation for those subjects was 4.6, 5.0 and 2.1 mm for the S& N, Stryker and WMT subjects, respectively. The average separation was 4.3, 2.0 and 2.1 mm for the S& N, Stryker and WMT subjects, respectively. For the eleven subjects in the control group, seven subjects had a S& N THA, two a Stryker and one each having a WMT and Encore THA. All 11 of these subjects demonstrated hip separation with the maximum values being 3.8, 3.4, 1.9 and 2.4 mm for the S& N, Stryker, WMT and Encore THA, respectively. The average separation values were 1.8, 2.3, 1.9 and 2.4 mm for the S& N, Stryker, WMT and Encore THA subjects, respectively. Four distinct sounds were produced by subjects in this study, which were squeaking, knocking, clicking and grating. Only 3/20 subjects produced a “squeaking” sound that was detected using our sound sensor. One of these subjects had a Stryker THA and two had a WMT THA. Further analysis of the nine subjects who were categorized as audible squeakers revealed that only 0/2, 1/6 and 1/1 subjects having a S& N, Stryker and WMT THA, respectively, demonstrated a squeaking sound that was detected using our sound sensor. Both (2/2) S& N subjects demonstrated a knocking and clicking sound, but neither produced a grating sound, while 5/6 Stryker subjects produced a knocking sound, but only 1/6 demonstrated a clicking or grating sound. Besides the squeaking sound, the only other sound produced by the WMT audible squeaker was a knocking sound. Only 1/11 control group subjects demonstrated a squeaking sound, which was a subject having a WMT THA. With respect to the control group subjects having a S& N THA, 5/7, 1/7 and 3/7 subjects produced a knocking, clicking or grating sound, respectively. Only 1/2 subjects having a Stryker THA produced a knocking or grating sound. This is the first study to compare multiple COC THAs in analyzing correlation of femoral head separation (sliding) and sound. It was seen that all the THA groups had occurrences of separation and each case of separation correlated with the sound data. These results lead the authors to believe that the influence of squeaking is multi-factorial, and not necessarily attributed only to the bearing surface material

While alumina ceramic-ceramic THA has been performed in the US for more than 12 years, the phenomenon of frequent, clinically reproducible squeaking is relatively new. The current study investigates the influence of implant design on the incidence of squeaking. We reviewed implant information on 1275 consecutive revision THAs performed from 10/2002 through 10/2007 to identify any patients who had complained of squeaking or grinding. We also identified, 2778 consecutive primary ceramicceramic THA. Of these, we reviewed the clinical records of 1,039 patients (37%) to date. Any patient complaint of squeaking or grinding at the time of an office visit or by phone interview was recorded. Hips were divided into group 1: flush mounted ceramic liner; group 2a: recessed ceramic liner mated with a stem made of TiAlV and using a 12/14 neck taper; and group 2b: recessed ceramic liner mated with a stem made of a beta titanium alloy comprised of 12% molybdenum, 6% Zirconium, and 2% Iron and using a neck taper smaller than a 12/14 taper. Of the revision THAs, 5 hips (0.4%) were in patients who had complained of squeaking or grinding. All 5 hips had a recessed, metal-backed ceramic liner and evidence of metallosis. In primary THAs, Group 2b had statistically significantly (p=0.04) more squeaking (7.6%) than group 2a (3.2%) which had statistically significantly (p=0.002) more squeaking than group 1 (0.6%). Squeaking following ceramic-ceramic THA is associated with use of a recessed metal-backed ceramic liner in combination with a femoral component made of a betatitanium alloy and using a relatively small head-neck taper. Since all revised hips in our study had metallosis, it is possible that metal debris is adversely affecting the bearing and that the elevated metal rim combined with a small head neck taper and the beta-titanium alloy contribute to this problem. Use of bearings with a flush-mounted ceramic liner mated with femoral components made of TiAlV and using a 12/14 taper appears to be prudent

Audible squeaking following ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a rare but troublesome problem. We retrospectively reviewed records of 1002 patients where a ceramic-on-ceramic THA had been done during the study period. Fifteen patients complained of squeaking, at any time following their arthroplasty. Fourteen of these 15 patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically. The demographics of these patients were compared to that of all the other patients who did not have squeaking following ceramic-on-ceramic THA. The radiographic data was compared to a control group matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), primary diagnosis, type of implant, date of surgery and length of follow-up. There were 12 males and 2 females of a mean age of 44.5 years (range, 25–65 years). These 14 patients were found to have significantly higher BMI of 25.98 kg/m2 (range, 21.6–32.3 kg/m2) as compared to the other patients who had ceramic-on-ceramic THA (mean, 23.61 kg/m2; range, 15.8 –30.3 kg/m2) (p=0.005). The lateral opening angle was found to be significantly lower (mean, 34°; range 29°–40°) in these patients than the matched control group (mean, 38°; range 30°–41°) (p=0.016). Mean acetabular anteversion was 22° (range 9°–37°), which was not significantly different to that of the matched controls (mean 23°; range 2°–33°) (p=.957). Limb length shortening of more than 5mm was observed in 12 of the 14 (85.7%) patients as compared to only 4 of 14 (28.6%) patients in the matched control group. Two patients had intermittent squeaking while the other 12 had continuous squeaking. Flexion and sitting cross legged were identified as the movements which most commonly (11 of 12) resulted in squeaking. Mean Harris hip score (HHS) improved from 44 (range, 19–66) to 94 (range, 88–100) and most patients (13 of 14) were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery. Thus the incidence of squeaking was found to be low (1.5%, 15 of 1002) in our series. We identified high BMI, decreased lateral opening angle and limb length shortening as factors associated with occurrence of squeaking. Proper patient selection, implant placement, and avoidance of limb length discrepancy are likely to further reduce the incidence of this complication of ceramic-on-ceramic THA

Ceramic on ceramic articulations had been used since 1970s but with high failure rate. More recent third generation alumina ceramic had improved results due to better material properties to resist wear and fracture and better methods of fixation with metal back acetabular components. A new clinical problem of squeaking has emerged in the last decade and is now a relatively common occurrence in ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty, with a reported incidence from less than 1% to 20% depending on the definition of the noise. We report experience with over 3000 ceramic-on-ceramic hips including the 10 year minimum follow-up of the first 301 cases. Methods: Between June 1997 and Feb 1999, 301 consecutive primary cementless hip arthroplasties were performed on 283 patients under the care of the two senior authors. The mean age of the patients was 58. All patients are asked on follow-up as part of a questionnaire: Has your hip ever made a squeaking noise? To date of the more than 3000 ceramic on ceramic hips that we follow, 74 hips (71 patients) responded yes to this question. Patient demographic and outcome data were analysed in all squeaking hips and compared with all primary ceramic on ceramic hips operated on at our unit. Results: Of the first 301 cases there have been 9 revision surgeries in 8 hips as follows. Two acetabular components revised for psoas tendonitis, one of these subsequently had both components revised for acetabular osteolysis with femoral revision to improve anteversion. There were six other femoral component revisions: four for periprosthetic femoral fractures, one for aseptic loosening and one for transient sciatic nerve palsy. There has been one squeaking hip in this group not requiring revision due to the mild and intermittent nature of the noise. All complications occurred within the first 3 years, no further complication has arisen since. When comparing the 74 squeaking hips to the entire cohort of primary hips we found that taller, heavier and younger patients are significantly more likely to have hips that squeak. Squeaking hips have a significantly higher range of post-operative movement than silent hips. Squeaking hips have a significantly higher Harris hip score. There was no difference in the satisfaction scores between squeaking and silent hips. Conclusion: In summary, we have reported the large series of third generation alumina ceramic on ceramic articulation with 10 year results, and have demonstrated that it can produce excellent survivorship with good clinical and radiographic outcome. We believe that this result had provided very encouraging evidence to support the use of third generation ceramics as articulation for primary hip arthroplasty, especially in young and active patients

Introduction: The goal of the study was to compare the squeaking frequencies of Ceramic-on-Ceramic THR in-vitro and in-vivo among patients who underwent THR. Method: Four patients, who underwent THR with a Ceramic-on-Ceramic THR (Trident. ®. , Stryker. ®. ) presented a squeaking noise. The noise was recorded and analysed with acoustic software (FMaster. ®. ). In-vitro 2 alumina ceramic (Biolox Forte Ceramtec. ®. ) 32 mm diameter (Ceramconcept. ®. ) components were tested using a PROSIM. ®. hip friction simulator. The cup was positioned with a 70° abduction angle in order to achieve edge loading conditions and the head was articulated ± 10° at 1 Hz with a load of 2.5kN for a duration of 300 cycles. Tests were conducted under lubricated conditions with 25% bovine serum and with the addition of a 3rd body alumina ceramic particle (200 μm thickness and 2 mm length). Results: In-vivo, recordings had a dominant frequency ranging between 2.2 and 2.4 kHz. In-vitro no squeaking occurred under edge loading conditions. However, with the addition of an alumina ceramic 3rd body particle in the contact region squeaking was obtained at the beginning of the tests and stopped after ~20 seconds (dominant frequency 2.6 kHz). Discussion and Conclusion: Squeaking noises of a similar frequency were recorded in-vitro and in-vivo. In-vitro noises followed edge loading and 3rd body particles and despite, the severe conditions, squeaking was intermittent and difficult to reproduce. The lower frequency of squeaking recorded in-vivo, demonstrates a potential damping effect of the soft tissues. No damage was observed on the components, however, the test duration was very short. Squeaking may be related to third body particles that could be generated by wear or impingement between the femoral neck and the metal back. Cup design seems to be of particular importance in noisy hip, leading to a high variability of squeaking rate according to the implants

This study assesses the incidence of noise in ceramic on ceramic (COC) bearings compared to metal on polyethylene (MOP) bearings. Noise after MOP implants has rarely been studied and they never been linked to squeaking. We have developed a noise characterising hip questionnaire and sent it along with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to 1000 patients; 509 respondents, 282 COC and 227 MOP; median age 63.7 (range 45–92), median follow up 2.9 years (range 6–156 months). 47 (17%) of the COC patients reported noise compared to 19 (8%) of the MOP patients (P=0.048). 9 COC and 4 MOP patients reported their hip noise as squeaking. We found the incidence of squeaking in the COC hips to be 3.2% compared to 1.8% in the MOP hips. Overall, 27% patients with noise reported avoiding recreational activities because of it and patient's with noisy hips scored on average 4 points less in the OHS (COC: P=0.04 and MOP: P =0.007). This is the first study to report squeaking from MOP hip replacements. We therefore believe the squeaking hip phenomenon is not exclusive to hard bearings. Surprisingly, only a small proportion of patients described nose from their as a ‘squeak’. Noisy hip implants may have social implications, and patients should be aware of this. We have shown a relationship between noise and a lower OHS. However, longer follow-up and further study is needed to link noise to a poorly functioning implant

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings provide a solution to the osteolysis seen with traditional metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Sporadic reports of ceramic breakage and squeaking concern some surgeons and this bearing combination can show in vivo signs of edge loading wear which was not predicted from in vitro studies. Taper damage or debris in the taper between the ceramic and metal may lead to breakage of either a ceramic head or insert. Fastidious surgical technique may help to minimise the risk of ceramic breakage. Squeaking is usually a benign complication, most frequently occurring when the hip is fully flexed. Rarely, it can occur with each step of walking when it can be sufficiently troublesome to require revision surgery. The etiology of squeaking is multifactorial in origin. Taller, heavier and younger patients with higher activity levels are more prone to hips that squeak. Cup version and inclination are also relevant factors. Osteolysis following metal-on-UHMW polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is well reported. Earlier generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearings did produce some osteolysis, but in flawed implants. As third and now fourth generation ceramic THAs come into mid- and long-term service, the orthopaedic community has begun to see reports of high survival rates and very low incidence of osteolysis in these bearings. The technique used by radiologists for identifying the nature of lesions on Computed Tomography (CT) scan is the Hounsfield score which will identify the density of the tissue within the lucent area. Commonly the radiologist will have no access to previous imaging, especially pre-operative imaging if a long time has elapsed. With such a low incidence of osteolysis in this patient group, what, then, should a surgeon do on receiving a CT report on a ceramic-on-ceramic THA, which states there is osteolysis? This retrospective review aims to determine the accuracy of CT in identifying true osteolysis in a cohort of long-term third generation ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented hip arthroplasties in our department. Pelvic CT scans were performed on the first 27 patients from a cohort of 301 patients undergoing 15-year review with third generation alumina-alumina cementless THAs. The average follow-up was 15 years (15–17). The CT scans were reviewed against pre-operative and post-operative radiographs and reviewed by a second musculoskeletal specialist radiologist. Eleven of the CT scans were reported to show acetabular osteolysis, two reported osteolysis or a possible pre-existing cyst and one reported a definitive pre-existing cyst. After review of previous imaging including pre-operative radiographs, eleven of the thirteen patients initially reported to have osteolysis were found to have pre-existing cysts or geodes in the same size and position as the reported osteolysis, and a further patient had spot-welds with stress-shielding. One patient with evidence of true osteolysis awaits aspiration or biopsy to determine if he has evidence of ceramic wear or metallosis. Reports of osteolysis on CT should be interpreted with care in modern ceramic-on-ceramic THA to prevent unnecessary revision. Further imaging and investigations may be necessary to exclude other conditions such as geodes, or stress shielding which are frequently confused with osteolysis on CT scans

Squeaking in hip arthroplasty is now well-documented but hitherto poorly understood. In this paper, we report data progressively accumulated from a series of studies undertaken by our group to investigate the mechanisms of noise production associated with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. We reviewed demographic and radiographic data comparing squeaking with silent hips. Edge loading of the acetabular components was investigated on retrieved bearings and with finite element analysis. The squeaking sound itself was further investigated through acoustic analysis. Squeaking occurs in younger, heavier, and taller patients. We found a higher incidence of acetabular component malposition in squeaking hips and edge loading appears to be a causative factor. Finite element analysis revealed a stiffness mismatch between the shell and liner which may allow the shell to oscillate producing an audible squeak. Acoustic and modal analysis show that squeaking is due to a forced vibration and that the natural frequencies of the ceramic components are above the audible range, suggesting that resonance occurs in the metallic, not the ceramic parts. This phenomenon is related to patient factors, surgical factors, and implant factors, which may produce sound by a combination of edge loading of the ceramic and forced vibration of the acetabular shell and/or the femoral stem

Aims. We conducted a prospective study of a delta ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) to determine the rate of ceramic fracture, to characterise post-operative noise, and to evaluate the mid-term results and survivorship. Patients and Methods. Between March 2009 and March 2011, 274 patients (310 hips) underwent cementless THA using a delta ceramic femoral head and liner. At each follow-up, clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was undertaken to estimate survival. Results. Four patients (four hips) died and 18 patients (20 hips) were lost to follow-up within five years. The remaining 252 patients (286 hips) were followed for a mean of 66.5 months (60 to 84). There were 144 men (166 hips) and 108 women (120 hips) with a mean age of 49.7 years (16 to 83) at surgery. The mean pre-operative Harris Hip Score of 47.1 points improved to 93.8 points at final follow-up. Six patients reported squeaking in seven hips; however, none were audible. Radiolucent lines involving Gruen zones one and/or seven were seen in 52 hips (18.2%). No hip had detectable wear, focal osteolysis or signs of loosening. One hip was revised because of fracture of the ceramic liner, which occurred due to an undetected malseating of the ceramic liner at the time of surgery. One hip was revised for a periprosthetic fracture of the femur, and one hip was treated for periprosthetic joint infection. The six-year survivorship with re-operation for any reason as the endpoint was 99.0% (95% confidence interval 97.8% to 100%). Discussion. The rate of delta ceramic fracture was 0.3% (one of 286). While ceramic head fracture was dominant in previous ceramic-on-ceramic THA, fracture of the delta ceramic liner due to malseating is a concern. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:741–8

The link between squeaking and ceramic on ceramic (CoC) bearings has been widely reported in orthopaedic literature and is described as a hard bearing phenomenon. We aim to look at the incidence of noise in CoC bearings compared to Metal on Polyethylene (MoP) bearing, which have yet to be linked to squeaking. We developed a noise characterizing hip questionnaire and sent that along with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to 1000 patients; 3:2 ratio of CoC to MoP. 282 CoC patients and 227 MoP patients returned the questions: 509 patients in total. Our patient database provided details on femoral head size and the acetabular inclination angle, for each respondent. 47 (17%) of the CoC hip patients reported noise compared to 19 (8%) of the MoP hip patients (P=0.054). 9 CoC patients and 4 MoP patients reported squeaking, while clicking was the most frequent answer in both groups. 27% patients with noise reported avoiding recreational activities because of it. Patient's with noisy hips scored on average, 5 points worse in the OHS (CoC: P = 0.04 and MoP: P = 0.007) and were on average 5 years younger (CoC: P<0.001 and MoP: P=0.007). No correlation was found between noisy hips and femoral head size or inclination angle. The squeaking hip phenomenon is not exclusive to hard bearing THA. Noise from patient's hips may have social implications and this should be highlighted when consenting a patient for either of these hip procedures. In both implants, we showed there to be a correlation between noise production and a lower OHS. However, longer follow up studies are needed to link noise to a poorly functioning implant

Young patients have been reported to have a higher risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty than older cohorts. This was attributed to the higher activity level which led to increased wear, osteolysis, and component fracture. We prospectively assessed the clinical results, wear and osteolysis, the incidence of squeaking, and the survivorship of ceramic on ceramic THA in patients younger than 50 years (mean age of 42 [18–50] years). The series included 425 THAs in 370 patients with 368 hips followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean 7.1 years, range 2–14 years). All patients received uncemented acetabular components with flush-mounted acetabular liners using an 18 degree taper. No osteolysis was observed in any uncemented construct. There was osteolysis around one loose cemented femoral component. The survivorship for reoperation for implant revision was 96.7%. There were only two acetabular liner fractures (0.47%) and one femoral head fracture (0.24%). Two of the three fractures involved a fall from a significant height. There were no hip dislocations. Five patients (1.17%) noted rare or occasional squeaking. None had reproducible squeaking. In summary, the current study shows that ceramic-on-ceramic THAs in the young patient population are extremely reliable with a very low revision rate and an absence of wear-induced osteolysis. In addition, it shows that both bearing fracture in this young patient population typically occurs with polytrauma and squeaking issues that have been raised relative to ceramic bearings occur very rarely with the flush-mounted ceramic liner design used in this study

The purpose of this study is to analyze clinical and radiological results of total hip arthroplasty using the 3rd generation ceramic on ceramic articular surface. Between July 1999 and May 2005, 339 hips of 250 patients had primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with the 3rd generation ceramic on ceramic bearing implants. And 325 hips of 236 patients were followed up over 3 years. Male were 168 patients(237 hips) and female were 68 patients(88 hips). The mean age at the time of operation was 47.3(range, 25~76) years old and the mean follow up period was 62.4(range, 36~107.6) months. The preoperative diagnoses were osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in 250 hips, secondary osteoarthritis in 55 hips(dysplasia in 35, infection sequalae in 12, LCP in 2, CDH in 2), hemophilic arthropathy in 9 hips, ankylosing spondylitis in 7 hips etc. We used Bicontact system(Aesculap, Germany) in 65 hips, Secur-FitTM(Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, USA) in 206 hips, Trilogy ABTM (Zimmer, USA) in 54 hips. Clinically, Harris Hip Score, thigh pain, squeaking and other complications were evaluated. Radiologically, the serial radiographs were analyzed. Clinically, the Harris hip score was improved from preoperative 66.0(19~91) to 96.2(58~100) at the last follow-up. Radiologically, there was no loosening of implants and visible wear and osteolysis. Heterotopic ossifications were noted in 5 cases. In complications, there was dislocation in one case, periprosthetic fracture in 2 cases and thigh pain in 9 cases. Intermittent squeaking sound has occurred in 8 cases(2.5%). Among these, one case of loud squeaking which happened after fall down had revision surgery. There was no infection and fracture of ceramic implant. Our midterm results of THA with the 3rd generation ceramic bearing system were very satisfactory and demonstrated that the 3rd generation ceramic bearings remain as an excellent bearing choice because of their superior wear characteristics. However, the results of this study suggests that the squeaking would be one of strong potential risk factors for failure of ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty and we must be very cautious to prevent squeaking

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings provide a solution to the osteolysis seen with traditional metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Sporadic reports of ceramic breakage and squeaking concern some surgeons and this bearing combination can show in vivo signs of edge loading wear which was not predicted from in vitro studies. Taper damage or debris in the taper between the ceramic and metal may lead to breakage of either a ceramic head or insert. Fastidious surgical technique may help to minimise the risk of ceramic breakage. Squeaking is usually a benign complication, most frequently occurring when the hip is fully flexed. Rarely, it can occur with each step of walking when it can be sufficiently troublesome to require revision surgery. The etiology of squeaking is multifactorial origin. Taller, heavier and younger patients with higher activity levels are more prone to hips that squeak. Cup version and inclination are also relevant factors. Fifty-five ceramic bearings revised at our center were collected over 12 years. Median time to revision was 2.7 years. Forty-six (84%) cases had edge loading wear. The median femoral head wear volume overall was 0.2mm. 3. /yr, for anterosuperior edge loading was 2.0mm. 3. /yr, and the median volumetric wear rate for posterior edge loading was 0.15mm. 3. /yr (p=0.005). Osteolysis following metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well reported. Earlier generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearings did produce some osteolysis, but in flawed implants. As 3rd and now 4th generation ceramic THAs come into mid- and long-term service, the orthopaedic community has begun to see reports of high survival rates and very low incidence of osteolysis in these bearings. The technique used by radiologists for identifying the nature of lesions on Computed Tomography (CT) scan is the Hounsfield score which will identify the density of the tissue within the lucent area. Commonly the radiologist will have no access to previous imaging, especially pre-operative imaging if a long time has elapsed. With such a low incidence of osteolysis in this patient group, what, then, should a surgeon do on receiving a CT report on a ceramic-on-ceramic THA, which states there is osteolysis? This retrospective review aims to determine the accuracy of CT in identifying true osteolysis in a cohort of long-term 3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented hip arthroplasties in our department. Methods. Pelvic CT scans were performed on the first 27 patients from a cohort of 301 patients undergoing 15-year review with 3rd generation alumina-alumina cementless THAs. The average follow-up was 15 years (15–17). The CT scans were reviewed against pre-operative and post-operative radiographs and reviewed by a second musculoskeletal specialist radiologist. Results. Eleven of the CT scans were reported to show acetabular osteolysis, two reported osteolysis or possible pre-existing cyst and one reported a definitive pre-existing cyst. After review of previous imaging including pre-operative radiographs, eleven of the thirteen patients initially reported to have osteolysis were found to have pre-existing cysts or geodes in the same size and position as the reported osteolysis, and a further patient had spot-welds with stress-shielding. One patient with evidence of true osteolysis awaits aspiration or biopsy to determine if he has evidence of ceramic wear or metallosis. Conclusions. Reports of osteolysis on CT should be interpreted with care in modern ceramic-on-ceramic THA to prevent unnecessary revision. Further imaging and investigations may be necessary to exclude other conditions such as geodes, or stress shielding which are frequently confused with osteolysis on CT scans

Squeaking ceramics bearing surfaces have been recently recognised as a problem in total hip arthroplasty. The position of the acetabular cup has been alluded to as a potential cause of the squeaking, along with particular combinations of primary stems and acetabular cups. This study has used the finite element method to investigate the propensity of a new large diameter preassembled ceramic acetabular cup to squeaking due to malpositioning. A verified three-dimensional FE model of a cadaveric human pelvis was developed which had been CT scanned, and the geometry reconstructed; this was to be used to determine the behaviour of large diameter acetabular cup system with a thin delta ceramic liner in the acetabulum. The model was generated using ABAQUS CAE pre-processing software. The bone model incorporated both the geometry and the materials properties of the bone throughout based on the CT scan. Finite element analysis and bone material assignment was performed using ABAQUS software and a FORTRAN user subroutine. The loading applied simulated edge loading for rising from a chair, heel-strike, toe off and stumbling. All results of the analysis were used to determine if the liner separated from the shell and if the liner was toggling out of the shell. The results were also examined to see if there was a propensity for the liner to demobilise and vibrate causing a squeaking sound under the prescribed loading regime. This study indicates that there is a reduction in contact area between the ceramic liner and titanium shell if a patient happens to trip or stumble. However, since the contact between the liner and the shell is not completely lost the propensity for it to squeak is highly unlikely

Acoustic emission is an uncommon but well-recognised phenomenon following total-hip arthroplasty using hard-on-hard bearing surfaces. The incidence of squeak has been reported between 1% – 10%. The squeak can be problematic enough to warrant revision surgery. Several theories have been proposed, but the cause of squeak remains unknown. Acoustic analysis shows squeak results from forced vibrations that may come from movement between the liner and shell. A potential cause for this movement is deformation of the shell during insertion. 6 cadaver hemipelvises were prepared to accept ace-tabular components. A shell was selected and pre-insertion the inner shape was measured using a profilometer. The shell was implanted and re-measured. 2x screws were then placed and the shells re-measured. The results were assessed for deformation. Deformation of the shells occurred in 5 of the 6 hemi-pelvises following insertion. The hemipelvis of the non-deformed shell fractured during insertion. Following screw insertion no further shell deformation occurred. The deformation was beyond the acceptable standards of a morse taper which may allow movement between components, and this may produce an acoustic emission. Further in-vitro testing is being conducted to see whether shell deformation allows movement producing an acoustic emission

Background. Theoretically, improved material properties of new alumina matrix composite (AMC) material, Delta ceramics, are expected to decrease concerns associated with pure alumina ceramics and allow manufacturing thinner liners and consequent larger heads. However, limited short-term clinical results are available and mid-term results of these effects are unclear. Questions/Purposes. (1) Does AMC material decrease the rate of ceramic fracture and noise, concerns of previous-generation ceramics, following change of material properties? (2) Does the possible use of larger heads consequent to manufacturing thinner liners decrease dislocation rate and affect inguinal pain? (3) Do any other complications associated with the use of AMC ceramics occur?. Materials and Methods. One-hundred cementless primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using AMC ceramic bearings were performed consecutively by single surgeon. The mean follow-up period was 5.4 years (range, 5.0 to 5.7) and average age at the time of arthroplasty was 54.7 years. Prostheses with identical design and Biolox® Delta ceramics were used in all patients. Clinical evaluation included the occurrence of inguinal pain and noise which was classified into squeaking, clicking, grinding and popping. Ceramic fracture, dislocation and any other complications associated with the use of AMC ceramics were also investigated. Result. No ceramic fracture occurred and noise was reported in three patients (3.2%); three subjective clicking, but no squeaking. Single event of perioperative dislocation due to incompliance occurred in one hip (1.1%) and inguinal pain was reported in two hips (2.1 %); neither evidence of iliopsoas tendinitis on ultrasonography, nor association with ceramic head size (p>0.05). Liner dissociation following initial square seating was shown immediately after surgery in one hip (1.1%) and underwent revision THA. Conclusion. Improved material properties combined with the possible use of larger-diameter head make AMC ceramics a promising alternative bearing option with reduced risk of ceramic fracture, squeaking and dislocation. In spite of these encouraging results, however, meticulous technical precautions such as square seating and proper impaction in particular, should be taken during whole process of liner insertion

Large diameter metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings are becoming increasingly popular for young, active patients. Clearance is a particularly important consideration for designing MOM implants, considering historical experience of equatorial contact and high frictional torque. Lubrication theory predicts increasing the clearance will result in diminished lubrication, resulting in increased friction and wear. Clinical cases of transient squeaking in patients with resurfacing bearings have been noted in recent years, with some reporting an incidence of up to 10% between 6 months and 2 years post-implantation. This study aimed to investigate the impact of increasing clearance on the lubrication, friction and squeaking of a large diameter metal-on-metal resurfacing bearing through frictional studies. Clinical-grade MOM implants of 55mm diameter and 100μm diametric clearance, and custom-made, 55mm bearings with diametric clearances of approximately 50μm and 200μm (DePuy International Ltd) were tested in a friction simulator. Components were inverted with a flexion-extension of ±25o applied to the head and lubricated with 25% and 100% newborn bovine serum. A peak load of 2kN, with swing-phase loads of 25N, 100N and 300N were applied. Sound data was recorded during each friction test using a MP3 recorder and pre-amplifier. A microphone was set up at a distance of 50mm from the implant, and data recorded over a minimum of 10 seconds where sound was generated. Sound data was assessed through narrow band analysis on Frequency Master software (Cirrus Research, UK). Lubrication was assessed by directly measuring the separation between the head and cup during the test cycle by ultrasonic methods (Tribosonics, UK). An ultrasound sensor was bonded to the back of the cup and reflection measurements were taken during the friction tests with a sampling rate of 100Hz. Using equations which related reflection coefficient to lubricant properties and thickness, values for the film thickness were calculated. The surface replacement with the largest clearance yielded the highest friction factor for each test condition. The difference between the large clearance bearing and the smaller clearance samples was statistically significant in 25% bovine serum, the more clinically relevant lubricant (ANOVA, p< 0.05). The 50μm clearance group yielded similar results to the 100μm clearance bearing, although a slight increase in friction was observed. Squeaking occurred during every test in the large clearance group. There was a reduced incidence of squeaking in the smaller clearances, with the lowest incidence observed in the 100μm clearance group. The smallest separation of the head and cup was observed within the large clearance bearings. The best lubrication condition measured ultrasonically was observed within the 100μm clearance bearing. There appeared to be good correlation between friction, lubrication and the incidence of squeaking. This study suggests a large diametric clearance results in reduced lubrication, increased friction and an increased incidence of squeaking. However, there is a minimum diametric clearance that can be tolerated, as clearance must accommodate the manufacturing tolerance

There are pros and cons of all bearing surface options for our young patients. I pick the bearing surface for my young patients trying to maximise durability and minimise risks. For the ultra-young, ≤30 years of age patient, I use ceramic-on-ceramic. The pros of this are the best wear couple available and a favorable track record (with well designed implants). The risks can be minimised: fracture risk now decreased, runaway wear minimised with good surgical technique, impingement problems minimised with good technique and well designed implants, as well as squeaking is minimised with good design (majority of reported squeakers are of one designed socket). I don't use metal-on-metal because I am not willing to subject young patients to potentially 50+ years of high metal ion exposure. I also don't use HCLPE. This would be okay from a biologic standpoint but I still have concerns about long-term wear durability. So the marked superior wear characteristics of ceramic-ceramic win in my view. For my middle age patients, 30–60, I use HCLPE I don't use ceramic-ceramic because at some point between 30 and 60 years of age the improved wear properties are outweighed by their potential risks (fracture, impingement, squeak). HCLPE at short F/U (<15 years) appears to be durable, reliable with good wear properties so it is a reasonable choice. Using a ceramic head versus CoCr provides minimal improvement in wear properties in the lab but no marked advantage in vivo. Concerns persist about cobalt-chrome corrosion so I use ceramic heads in the majority of patients. For patients under age 60 the wear characteristics of HCLPE appear very favorable and one doesn't assume other risks seen in with metal-on-metal and ceramic-ceramic. Little justification for a hard-on-hard bearing in this patient subgroup. I use ceramic heads in majority to avoid corrosion issues

The leading cause for total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision remains aseptic loosening due to bearing wear. The younger and more active patients currently undergoing arthroplasty present unprecedented demands on THA-bearings. Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings have consistently shown the lowest wear rates. The recent advances, especially in alumina CoC bearings, have solved many past problems and produced preferable results in vitro. Alumina ceramics are extremely hard, scratch resistant, biocompatible, offer a low coefficient of friction, superior lubrication and lower wear rates in comparison to other bearings in THA. The major disadvantage of ceramics used to be fracture. The new generation of alumina ceramics, has reduced the risk of ball fracture to 0.03–0.05%. The risk for liner fracture is even lower. Assuming an impingement-free component implantation, CoC bearings have major advantages over other bearing combinations. Due to the superior hardness, CoC bearings produce less third body wear and are virtually impervious to damage from instruments during the implantation process. A complication specific to CoC bearings is squeaking. Squeaking occurs if the friction in the joint articulation is sufficient to excite vibrations to audible magnitudes (due to loss of lubrication). The high range of reported squeaking (0.45% to 10.7%) highlights the importance of correct implant position. If a correct implant position can be guaranteed, then squeaking is rare and without clinical significance. The improved tribology and presumable resulting implant longevity make CoC the bearing of choice for young and active patients. Especially the alumina matrix (Biolox delta) offers increased burst strength and greater fracture toughness

Squeaking is a rare complication of hard-on-hard hip bearings. Occasionally the noise is troublesome enough to warrant revision surgery. The purpose of this study is to contribute to the understanding of the mechanism(s) underlying squeaking. We analyzed 10 alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings from squeaking hips collected at revision surgery. The reason for revision was given as squeaking (6 cases) or squeaking and pain (4 cases). Six of the 10 patients were male, average patient age was 48. Bearings were retrieved after an average of 23 months in service (11 to 61 months). There were 4 different designs of acetabular component from 2 different manufacturers. Nine have an elevated metal rim which is proud of the ceramic and one does not. Two bearings were 36mm in diameter, 6 were 32mm and 2 were 28mm. All 10 bearings showed evidence of edge loading wear. Mean dimensions of the wear patch were 37mm by 12mm on the acetabular component and 32mm by 13mm on the femoral heads. Wear dimension was not related to bearing diameter. Seven of the 10 implants also had evidence of impingement of the femoral neck against the elevated metallic rim or the ceramic insert or both. There was no chipping or fracture of any of the ceramic components. Squeaking is a recently recognized complication of hard on hard bearing surface. This retrieval study is the first of its kind, to our knowledge attempting to unravel the mechanism of this undesirable complication. Although impingement seems to be present in majority of cases, the latter does not seem to be necessary. Edge loading wear was the common factor in all cases and this may prove to be a critical mechanism

Squeaking has become a more common problem following hard on hard bearings in total hip replacements. Although most squeaking is occasional and not concerning to either patient or health care practitioner, some reports of squeaking indicate high percentages (7% or higher) that can be constant and quite concerning. Much work has been done in this area, and although the exact mechanism is not yet understood, most of the data suggests a particular hip replacement system (metal alloy, taper design, cup design) significantly elevates to quantity and quality of the squeaking problem to concerning levels. Those specific details are described in depth along with future studies to improve our understanding in the nature of this acoustical phenomenon

Introduction. Long term results of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) are affected by wear of articulation. Ceramic on ceramic articulation have been used especially for young patients because of its low wear and bio-inert property. However, because of its hardness, it is concerned that ceramic fracture, chipping, or squeaking might happen with ceramic on ceramic articulation. Objective. The purpose of this study was to investigate over 10-years clinical and radiographic results of ceramic bearing cementless THA. Methods. Evaluation was performed in 60 patients (68 joints) who underwent primary cementless THA from May 2003 to April 2007. Mean age at surgery was 59 years. Mean follow up period was 11.2 years. Forty-nine patients were female. Mean BMI at surgery was 24.0 kg/m. 2. Fifty-one patients had osteoarthrosis, 6 patients had osteonecrosis, 2 patients had rheumatoid arthraitis, and 1 patient had PSS. A 28mm-size femoral head was used in all patients. Clinical evaluation was performed with Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Score (JOA score). Radiographic results were evaluated with standard bilateral hip radiograph in supine position. Results. Mean clinical score at surgery was 45 (pain: 13/40, ROM: 12/20, gait: 9/20, ADL: 12/20). Mean clinical score at final follow up was 92 (pain: 39/40, ROM: 17/20, gait: 17/20, ADL: 18/20). Pain score was dramatically improved from 13 to 39 (maximum pain score: 40). One stem was revised because of recurrent dislocation. Two other patients experienced one time dislocation during follow up. One stem showed 5mm of subsidence. ALL cups and stems showed bone ingrowth at final follow up. Cortical hypertrophy was seen in 17 joints. However, there was no patient complained thigh pain. Stress shielding was seen in 55 joints (81%). First, second and third degree of stress shielding were seen in 12, 40, and 3 joints, respectively. Most of the female patients who had surgery at the age over 60 years showed second and third degree of stress shielding. There was no measurable wear. No osteolysis was found around the implants. There were no ceramic fracture, chipping, and squeaking. Conclusion. This study demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic results of ceramic bearing cementless THA. Excellent long term results will be expected with this system

While total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been shown successful at relieving pain and improving function in patients with coxarthrosis, wear and instability remain leading causes for revision surgery. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXPE) has significantly reduced wear and osteolysis but volumetric wear associated with the use of larger diameter ball heads may be an issue in the long-term. Finally, concerns with femoral taper corrosion have increased the utilization of ceramic ball heads in recent years. Ceramic on ceramic articulations are optimised for both minimizing implant wear and instability. It is biocompatible, wettable, and possesses the lowest in vitro and in vivo wear rates among all bearing couples. In fact, wear rates are lowest when the ceramic ball head size is maximised. Additionally, modern ceramic on ceramic THA designs have had an excellent clinical track record with low rates of loosening, failure, and no reports of osteolysis in even highly active, young patients. Concerns with ceramics center around issues related to fracture risk, squeaking, and cost. While the phenomenon of squeaking remains poorly understood, the reliability of ceramic implants have steadily improved with better materials, design, and manufacturing. The fracture risk for modern pure alumina implants and the newer alumina matrix composite ceramics are 1 in 5000 and 1 in 100,000, respectively. The advantages of ceramic on ceramic THAs will not be realised on every patient and therefore, should be selectively used. However, with expected increases in life expectancy and more young, active patients undergoing THA, ceramic on ceramic THA should be strongly considered in patients under age 60 years

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been associated with increased rates of complications and revision. Hip instability and wear-induced osteolysis are among the more common and serious of these problems. The current investigation prospectively assessed the survivorship and clinical results of patients with DDH treated by alumina ceramic-ceramic THA. We investigated 161 consecutive hips in 145 patients with DDH classified as Crowe type I (131 hips, 81%), II (26 hips, 16%), III (2 hips, 1%), and IV (2 hips, 1%). All patients had an uncemented titanium acetabular component with a flush mounted alumina ceramic-ceramic bearing. The mean age at operation was 48.0 ± 12.2 years (range, 18 – 79 years). The preoperative Merle d'Aubigné score was 11.4 ± 1.7 (6 – 15). 27 hips (17%) had at least one previous surgical procedure. 92 hips (57%) were replaced with the use of surgical navigation for acetabular component positioning. The mean cup diameter was 49.9 ± 3.4 mm (46 – 60 mm). 88 (55%) bearings were 28mm and 73 (45%) bearings were 32mm. At a mean follow-up of 6.1 ± 2.5 years (2 – 11.3 years), the mean Merle d'Aubigné score was 17.4 ± 0.9 (14 – 18). There were no cases of osteolysis or dislocation. There was one reoperation of an early displaced cup. In addition, there was one calcar crack that was cerclaged, one intraoperative trochanteric fracture also repaired at surgery. No patient complained of squeaking. 94 patients with 100 hips (61%) completed a questionnaire specifically asking for squeaking. None of these patients reported squeaking. The 10-year Kaplan Meier survivorship of the implants (revision of any component for any reason) was 99.4% (95% confidence interval 98.2-100%). Results of ceramic-ceramic THA in young patients with low to middle graded DDH after two to eleven years follow-up are promising with no radiographic signs of osteolysis or dislocation

Introduction: Squeaking is reported ceramic-on-ceramic hip bearings in association with acetabular component malposition – particularly too much or too little anteversion. Acoustic analysis of squeaking hips with modular ceramic-titanium acetabular components suggests that there may be dynamic uncoupling of the ceramic insert from the titanium shell with edge loading of the ceramic. The aim of this study was to investigate edge loading of a modular ceramic-titanium acetabular component during gait at different positions of anteversion using the finite element (FE) method. Methods: An intact and reconstructed 3D FE model of a human pelvis was generated using PATRAN. Bone properties extracted from the CT data were applied using FORTRAN subroutines. A generic acetabular titanium shell and ceramic liner were modelled and placed in the pelvis in two different positions: ideal anteversion and 18 degree excess anteversion. The contact conditions simulated a fully osseointegrated acetabular shell and a matched taper junction with a friction coefficient of 0.2. We ran FE analysis with ABAQUS software to determine the stress distribution and surface separation of shell and liner at toe-off. Results: The separation distance between the ceramic liner and the acetabular shell for the anteverted component (40mm) was an order of magnitude greater than that for the ideally positioned component (4mm). There was “tilting” of the ceramic liner out of the acetabular shell in both cases. Discussion: Based on clinical observations, the toe-of phase of gait is a common position for squeaking to occur. Clinical retrievals also show evidence of edge loading wear and contralateral taper interface separation with the “tilting” of the liner out of the acetabular shell. It is envisaged that the “tilting” of the liner in the acetabular shell may allow forced vibrations associated with the squeaking phenomena, possibly in combination with edge loading

The use of cementless acetabular components is currently the gold standard for treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous coated cups have a low modulus of elasticity that enhances press-fit and a surface that promotes osseointegration. Monoblock acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cup with the liner moulded into the metal shell, minimizing potential backside wear and eliminating the chance of mal-seating. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic performances of a modular cup with that of a monoblock cup, with particular interest in the advent of lucent lines and their correlation with clinical outcomes. In this multi-surgeon, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 86 patients undergoing unilateral THA were recruited. Participants were randomized to either a porous-coated, modular metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) acetabular component (n=46) or a hydroxyapatite (HA)- and titanium-coated monoblock shell with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing (n=42). The porous-coated cup had an average pore size of 250 microns with an average volume porosity of 45%, whereas the monoblock shell had an average pore size of 300 microns with an average volume porosity of 48% and a HA coating thickness of 80 nm. There were no baseline demographic differences between both groups regarding sex, age, body mass index (BMI), or American Society of Anaesthesia (ASA) class (p>0.05). All of the sockets were under-reamed by 1 mm. Radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Hip Score, were available for evaluation at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. A radiolucent distance between the cup and acetabulum of ≥0.5 mm was defined as gap if it was diagnosed from outset or as radiolucency if it had sclerotic edges and was found on progressive x-ray analyses. Thirty-two gaps (69%) were found in the modular cup group and 28 (6%) in the monoblock one (p=0.001). Of the former, 17 filled the gaps whereas 15 turned into a radiolucency at final assessment. Of the latter, only 1 of the gaps turned into a radiolucency at final follow-up (p 0.05) in both groups. Only the porous-coated cup was an independent predictor of lucent lines (OR:0.052, p=0.007). No case underwent revision surgery due to acetabular loosening during the study period. Only 2 cases of squeaking were reported in the CoC monoblock shell. Both porous-coated modular and hydroxyapatite-coated monoblock cups showed successful clinical results at short-term follow-up, however, the former evidenced a significantly higher rate of radiolucent line occurrence, without any association with PROMs. Since these lines indicate the possibility of future cup loosening, longer follow-up and assessment are necessary

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been associated with increased rates of complications and revision. Hip instability and wear-induced osteolysis are among the more common and serious of these problems. The current investigation prospectively assessed the clinical results and the survivorship of patients with DDH treated by alumina ceramic-ceramic THA. We investigated 164 consecutive hips in 147 patients with DDH. Twenty-five hips (15%) had prior surgery to improve acetabular coverage, 108 hips (66%) were classified as Crowe type I, 21 (13%) as type II, and 10 (6%) as type III. All patients had an uncemented titanium acetabular component with a flush mounted alumina ceramic-ceramic bearing and were treated between 1997 and 2006. The mean age at operation was 48.5 ± 12.2 years (range, 18–75 years). The preoperative Merle d’Aubigné score was 11.3 ± 1.6 (6–15). Ninety-four hips (57%) were replaced with the use of surgical navigation for acetabular component positioning. The mean cup diameter was 51.2 ± 3.9 mm (46–60 mm). Seventy-seven (47%) bearings were 28mm and 87 (53%) bearings were 32mm. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 ± 2.3 years (2–10 years), the mean Merle d’Aubigné score was 17.5 ± 1.2 (14–18). There were no cases of osteolysis or dislocation. There was one reoperation of an early displaced cup. In addition, there was one calcar crack that was cerclaged, one intraoperative trochanteric fracture also repaired at surgery. No patient complained of squeaking. Ninety-four patients with 100 hips (61%) completed a questionnaire specifically concerning squeaking. None of these patients reported on squeaking either. The 10-year Kaplan Meier survivorship of the implants (revision of any component for any reason) was 99.1% (95% confidence interval 98.0–100%). Results of ceramic-ceramic THA in young patients with low to middle graded DDH after two to ten year follow-up are promising with no radiographic signs of osteolysis or dislocation

Introduction. Modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have become attractive alternatives to conventional polyethylene due to their low wear and minimal particle production. However, ceramic-on-ceramic implants have been associated with ceramic fracture and squeaking. To address these issues, large ceramic heads with a titanium-alloy sleeve have been introduced although limited data are available on their clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to report the midterm results of primary total hip arthroplasty using a 32mm with a titanium-alloy sleeve. Materials & Methods. We reviewed 245 patients who had 274 total hip arthroplasties with a 32 mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve and had been followed for more than 5 years (average, 6.5 years; range, 5–9 years). The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 55.1 years (range, 16–82 years). All operations were performed at a single center. All of the ceramic implants were hot isostatic pressed, laser-marked, proof-tested third-generation alumina (Fig. 1). We determined the implant survival, Harris hip scores, incidence of ceramic fracture or noisy hips, and presence of osteolysis. Results. The survival rate of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in primary total hip arthroplasty using 32 mm ceramic head with titanium-alloy sleeve was 97.5% at 9 years (Fig. 2). The Harris hip score improved from mean of 47 preoperatively to 93 at last follow-up. One ceramic head fractured at 6 years postoperatively. No ceramic liners were seen to fracture. Audible hip noise was identified in five hips (1.8%); clicking in four and squeaking in one. Osteolysis was detected in four hips (1.5%), but all had no symptom (Fig. 3). Other complications included three deep infections, two dislocations, and one peroneal nerve palsy. Conclusions. Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32 mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve has a high survival rate of 97.5% at a 9-year follow-up. Nevertheless, surgeons should be aware of the potential risks of ceramic fracture, noise, and osteolysis associated with the use of ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve

Introduction. Dislocation due to suboptimal cup positioning is a devastating complication in the early phase after total hip arthroplasty. Malpositioning can also result in other mechanical complications like subluxation, edge loading, increased debris, surface damage or squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips. Preventing at least some of these complications in younger and more active patients is of paramount interest for the individual patient and for the society since optimized component orientation is an important determinant to reduce such risks and to further increase longevity of the implant. This study reports on two new surgical instruments that help the orthopedic surgeon to manually place both components within the optimized combined safe-zone (cSafe-Zone). Material and Methods. More than 900 minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasties (MIS-THA) have been performed between 2007 and 2015 in our institution using the minimal-invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) on an orthopedic table with foot holder. Cups were implanted applying the “stem-first” surgical technique i.e. the prosthetic stem dictates the orientation of the socket depending on the prosthesis design. A system-specific trial head which indicates the prosthesis-specific relative orientation of cup and stem and a modified cup impactor were used to finally seat the definitive acetabular socket manually during trial stem reduction while fully visually controlling the optimal orientation of the cup during impaction. This surgical technique drives both components into their optimal relative positions according to the combined version and the combined safe-zone concept in total hip arthroplasty. Results. Both new instruments, femoral trial head as well as the modified cup impactor, provide an easy way to manually control the optimal placement of the acetabular socket during impaction intraoperatively. The combined safe-zone is clearly indicated and the inverse interrelationship of stem and cup anteversion is ideally reflected by this simple mechanical system. In patients operated on with the “stem-first” technique the components were placed in the new cSafe-Zone in 94% of the cases and no squeaking or prosthetic impingement did occur in any of these patients. One early dislocation did occur and was treated by closed reduction. Conclusion. Stem-first technique using trial head-controlled impaction with a modified cup impactor is ideally suited for the minimal-invasive direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty to control the placement of both prosthetic components. It assists the surgeon in aligning the cup and the stem according to the cSafe-Zone in order to get the intended range of movement (iROM)

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful and commonly performed surgical interventions worldwide. Based on registry data, at one-year post THA, implant survivorship is nearly 100% and patient satisfaction is 90%. A novel, porous coated acetabular implant was introduced in Europe and Australia in 2007. Several years after its introduction, warnings were issued for the system when used with metal-on-metal bearings due to adverse local tissue reaction, with one study reporting a 24% failure rate (Dramis et al. 2014). A subsequent 2018 study by Teoh et al. showed that the acetabular system had a survival rate of 98.9% at five years when used with conventional polyethylene or ceramic bearing surfaces. The current study was conducted to determine the safety and effectiveness of the acetabular system using standard highly-crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) and ceramic liners at five-year follow-up. Our hypothesis was that the acetabular system would exhibit survivorship comparable to other acetabular components on the market at five-year follow-up. A prospective, non-randomized study was conducted from February 2009 to June 2017 at eight sites in Canada and the USA. One hundred fifty-five hips were enrolled and 148 hips analyzed after THA indicated for degenerative arthritis. At five-year follow-up, 103 subjects remained for final analysis. All patients received a zero, three, or multi-hole R3 acetabular shell with Stiktite porous coating (Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA). Standard THA surgical techniques were employed, with surgical approach and either of a XLPE or ceramic bearing surface chosen at the discretion of the surgeon. The primary outcome was revision at five-years post-op with secondary outcomes including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), radiographic analysis, and post-operative adverse events. Data and outcomes were analyzed using summary statistics with 95% confidence intervals, t-tests, and Wilcoxon Rank tests. At five-year follow-up the overall success rate was 97.14% (95% CI: 91.88–100). When analyzed by liner type, the success rate was 96.81% (95% CI: 90.96–99.34) for polyethylene (n=94) and 100% (95% CI: 71.51–100) for ceramic (n=11), with no significant difference between either liner type (p=1). There were three revisions during the study (1.9%), two for femoral stem revision post fracture, and one for deep infection. The HHS (51.36 pre-op, 94.50 five-year), all 5 HOOS sub-scales, and WOMAC (40.9 pre-op, 89.13 five-year) scores all significantly improved (p < 0 .001) over baseline scores at all follow-up points. One (0.7%) subject met the criteria for radiographic failure at one-year post-op but did not require revision. Six (1.8%) of the reported adverse events were considered related to the study device, including four cases of squeaking, one bursitis, and one femur fracture. Results from this five-year, multicenter, prospective study indicate good survivorship for this novel, porous coated acetabular system. The overall survivorship of 97.14% at five-year follow-up is comparable to that reported for similar acetabular components and aligns with previous analyses (Teoh et al. 2018)

Due to issues related to osteolysis which became increasingly evident in the 1990's, approaches to combat wear focused upon either improving ultra-high molecular grade polyethylene or to abandon it and employ alternative bearings: metal upon metal or ceramic upon ceramic (COC). Ceramics have played a role in hip bearings for decades with much of the experience coming from Europe. While there is consistent evidence of low wear rates in this bearing couple due to its surface hardness, wettability and resultant low friction, problems unique to this bearing couple were noted: a small but real incidence of fracture, surface damage due to metal transfer and stripe wear as well as the unique issue of squeaking. What we have learned is that these hard bearings (either COC or Metal on Metal) despite being able to use larger diameter heads, are exquisitely sensitive to component position and orientation. With the tremendous improvements in 2nd and now 3rd generation crosslinked polyethylenes demonstrating vastly reduced wear rates and having none of the issues of fracture, stripe wear, or squeaking, it remains unclear what role ceramic bearings have in modern use. Until the aforementioned issues are resolved, ceramic on ceramic bearings in the young patient should be used with caution. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: incidence of instability and noise

Since 1999 we have adopted the ceramic on ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty. We started with sandwich liners, abandoned afterwards in favor of all ceramic liners. We witnessed the progressive evolution of the diameters of the femoral heads from 28 mm to the actual 40 mm. Out of more than 500 implants, we experienced 1 case of fracture of the ceramics, 5 cases of squeaking and 5 dislocations. A total of 5 implants underwent revision. Patients and Methods: In 1999 we started using a ceramic-ceramic bearing in THA with the SPH blind cup (Lima Lto, San Daniele del Friuli) that had a “sandwich” liner. The stem used was the F2L modular stem (Lima Lto.). In 2 years (1999–2000) we performed 32 total hip arthroplasties in 32 patients with these implants. From 2001 we started using an all-ceramic liner and two kind of stems: Modulus and C2 (Lima Lto). We performed from 2001 to 2003 76 total hip arthroplasties with these implants. From 1999 to 2003 the only diameter available for the heads was 28 mm. Starting from 2004, 32 and 36 mm heads were available. We implanted 391 ceramic-ceramic implants (23 28mm, 138 32mm and 230 36mm heads) using the Delta Cup (Lima Lto.). We’ve implanted 12 heads of 40 mm size. The stems used were the Modulus or the C2 stem. We performed, from 1999, to March 2009 511 implants in 465 patients (46 bilateral). 320 patients were women, 145 men. Mean follow up is 5.3 years (6 months-10 years). Mean age was 68,4 years (18–80). Results: The mean Harris Hip Score was 93,2 considering the overall population at last follow up (mean 5,3 years, range 6 months- 10 years). In 1 case we experienced the fracture of the liner. 5 implants had dislocations and 1 case needed revision. The other 4 implants were treated conservatively with excellent results at final follow up. We had 5 cases of squeaking: in 1 case it recovered itself, in 2 cases the phenomenon is occasional and in 1 case it’s persistent. No revision surgery has been required by these 4 patients. 1 patient developed squeaking after a subdislocation and needed revision for substitution of the head. We revised 3 other implants: 2 for infection and 1 for a periprosthetic fracture. On the radiological side there were no signs of mobilization of the cup or of the stem. We found radiolucent lines in 35 cases: 13 in zone 1 according to Gruen, 6 in zone 2 and 16 in zone 3. Radiolucent lines were always less than 2 mm wide and stable at all radiographic controls. Discussion: The use of the ceramic-ceramic bearing in total hip replacement has become in the last years more and more widespread. This has been sustained by very strong data available in the literature about the results of these bearing surfaces at a long term follow up. Our experience shows excellent clinical and radiological results at a medium-long term follow up and are consistent with those published in the literature

Osteolysis is one of a major cause of failure that affect long term survival rate in THA. Hard-on-hard bearing surface were developed to reduce wear and osteolysis, such as ceramic-on-ceramic which is the lowest wear rate was introduced but it still has squeaking and ceramic fracture. Metal-on-metal bearing surface significantly reduce wear rate but it still release metal ion which affect local tissue reaction. Then ceramic-on-metal is another choice of bearing with combine the advantage of reduce wear rate, metal ion release, no stripe wear, no squeaking and no ceramic fracture. However after clinical use ALTRs may occur and disturb the longevity of THA. During January 2009 to December 2009 we performed 98 THR with the same femoral stem and acetabular cup with difference bearing which were 87 cases of metal on cross-linked PE, 8 cases of ceramic on metal and 5 cases of metal on metal. Routinely postoperative care were done with clinical evaluation, plain x-rays and Harris hip score. After 5 years follow up there are clinical problems in ceramic on metal THA with decrease clinical score and progressive osteolysis in radiographic finding in 2 cases then we investigated to find the cause of this problem and revise the components. We preformed magnetic resonance imaging and collect blood sample for ESR, CRP and Cobalt and Chromium level. We revised 2 cases of ceramic on metal THA, during surgery we collected tissue for bacterial and AFB and histopathology. All retrieval components were studied for wear pattern. First patient have thigh pain and progressive osteolysis after year 4. th. of follow up. She had normal ESR and CRP with high level of cobalt and chromium level. We revised both components and tissue histopathology showed metallosis with chronic inflammation. Another patient had failure due to ALTRs with mixed solid-cystic mass at trochanteric bursa but component is stable then only bearing surface were change. Wear pattern at femoral head was in weight bearing area with corresponding to apical center wear of metal liner. Our study showed that only in group of ceramic-on-metal THA that have 5 years follow up have early reoperation due to osteolysis and tissue reaction. We routinely stop to use this bearing since 2010. But we have small number of cases in our study to conclude that is bearing are not suitable for clinical usage

The recent introduction of modern ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties have demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic results without catastrophic failure such as implant fracture associated with earlier designs. In laboratory wear testing, ceramicon-ceramic provides the least volumetric wear among all bearing surfaces. In recent years, with modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces, clinical results with 5-to 7-year follow up have been good to excellent in 95–97% of cases. In spite of excellent results, certain limitations still exist including occasional fracture, stripe wear, squeaking, and neck-socket impingement producing metallic third body. Future improvement in ceramics (and other hard-bearing surfaces) and its coupling with other hard bearing surfaces appears to have significant advantages in reducing dislocation, impingement, stripe wear and squeaking

Introduction. Porous coated cups have a low modulus of elasticity that enhances press-fit and a surface that promotes osseointegration as well as permitting modularity. Monoblock ceramic acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cup permitting the use of large femoral heads. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic performances of both cups. Methods. This was a prospective RCT of 86 unilateral THA patients (M: 40, F: 48; mean age: 59.5 ± 10.6) randomized to either a porous-coated, modular metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) acetabular component (pore size 250µm, 45% mean volume porosity)(n=46) or a hydroxyapatite (HA) and titanium-coated monoblock shell with ceramic-on-ceramic(CoC) bearing (pore size 300µm, 48% mean volume porosity & 80nm HA coating thickness)(n=42). All sockets were under-reamed by 1 mm. Two-year radiographs and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were available. Results. Thirty-two (69%) and 28 (6%) gaps were found in modular cup and monoblock groups, respectively (p=0.001). For the modular, 17 filled the gaps, whereas 15 turned into radiolucency; for the monoblock, 1 of the gaps turned into radiolucency at final follow-up (p<0.001). Complete shell-to-bone contact without radiolucent lines was seen in 30 (65%) porous-coated cups and in 41 (98%) HA shells (p<0.001). There were no associations between presence of lucent lines and PROMs (mHHS, WOMAC and UCLA) (p>0.05) in both groups. Modular cup group was an independent predictor of developing lucent lines (OR: 19.1, p= 0.007). No case underwent revision surgery due to acetabular loosening. There were 2 cases of squeaking in CoC monoblock shell with no functional limitations. Conclusion. Both cups showed successful clinical results at short-term follow-up; however, the porous-coated modular evidenced a significantly higher rate of radiolucent line occurrence, without any association with PROMs. Since these lines indicate the possibility of future cup loosening, longer follow-up is necessary. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aluminia ceramic on ceramic (COC) bearing surfaces have been used for 35 years in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies report 85% survival at a minimum follow-up of 18.5 years. Nonetheless, an audible noise is a finding associated with COC bearings with incidence rates of 2–10%. This study aims to determine the prevalence of noise and evaluate its effect on patients. All patients who had a COC THA from August 2003 to December 2010 were contacted and asked to complete a standardised questionnaire. This asked about the presence and characteristics of a noise and if associated with activities, pain and whether this phenomenon should be mentioned preoperatively. Four consultant surgeons performed 282 consecutive primary COC THAs in 258 patients. (Male=122, Female=136 mean age 68.5; age range 28–88). In all cases, the same brand of ceramic acetabular component and stems were implanted. 11.0% had a noise, of which 5.5% had a squeak. Pain was experienced in 38.7% of patients in hips that made a noise. There was no trauma and one dislocation in this group. In this study, 85% of noises occur during weight-bearing although no patients have reduced daily activities as a result of the noises. Of all the patients, 55.0% stated they would have preferred to have known about a noisy hip possibility before consenting but none would have refused consent. Squeaking has not been a problem here despite the prevalence being higher than most in the literature. The authors recommend that squeaking should be discussed preoperatively. A checklist for Orthopaedic Trainees is being drafted to enable trainees to counsel patients appropriately, allowing patients a better opportunity to give informed consent

INTRODUCTION. Young patients (< 50 years old) have been reported to have a higher risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty (THA) than older patient cohorts, possibly to due higher activity, a higher incidence of deformity and greater probability of prior surgery. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces have been proposed for use in young and active individuals due to their low wear, low risk of adverse biologic reaction, and long-term survivorship. We assessed the clinical results and long-term survivorship of uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic THA in a young patient population. METHODS. Between August 1999 and December 2007, 220 total hip arthroplasties in 191 patients under 50 years of age at the time of surgery were performed using alumina ceramic-ceramic bearings as part of a prospective, non-randomized study. All patients received uncemented acetabular components with flush-mounted acetabular liners using an 18 degree taper, and uncemented femoral components. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 42.1 ±7.2 years (range: 17.4 years to 49.9 years), and the average time to follow-up was 10.1 ±2.4 years (range: 4.2 years to 15.2 years). We evaluated implant-related complications and performed Kaplan-Meier analyses to determine survivorship of the THA components with revision for any reason as the endpoint. RESULTS. There were no dislocations or failures due to osteolysis or aseptic loosening. There was one patient death not related to the THA procedure. Through 15-years, the Kaplan-Meier survivorship of all components was 94.9% (CI: ±8.0) with 8 revisions (3.6%) of either the cup, the stem, or both. For the acetabular component, the 15-year survivorship was 97.0% (CI: ±6.1) and included 4 revisions (1.8%), and 98.1% (CI: ±1.9) for the femoral component including 4 revisions (1.8%). One patient had both the femoral and acetabular components revised. There were two liner fractures (0.59%) and one head fracture (0.3%), two of which were sustained as a result of a fall from significant height. There were three failures of osseointegration (1.3%), and one acetabular component dislodged (0.4%) immediately following surgery. Two patients reported non-reproducible squeaking. One hip was revised at an outside institution for unknown reasons. Using the National Institutes for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines, our results are well within the 1% per year acceptable failure rate for this young patient population (acetabular components: 0.1% per year, femoral components: 0.1% per year, all revisions: 0.2% per year). From our experience, ceramic-on-ceramic THA in patients less than 50 years of age is very reliable with a low revision rate and absence of wear-related osteolysis. Component fracture typically occurs with high-energy trauma, and squeaking occurrence is rare in the flush-mounted ceramic liners used in our study. CONCLUSION. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients demonstrates excellent survivorship when uncemented titanium implants are coupled with ceramic-ceramic bearings

INTRODUCTION. Ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing offers a bone conserving treatment for more active patients without the potential metal ion risks associated with resurfacing devices. The Biolox Delta ceramic material has over 15 years of clinical history with low wear and good biocompatibility but has been limited previously in total hip replacement to 48mm diameter bearings [1]. Further increasing the diameter for resurfacing bearings and removing the metal shell to allow for direct fixation of the ceramic cup may increase the wear of this material and increase the risk of fracture. METHODS. Eighteen implants (ReCerf™, MatOrtho, UK; Figure1) were wear tested; six were ⊘40mm (small) and twelve ⊘64mm (large). All small and six large implants were tested under ISO 14242 standard conditions for 5 million cycles (mc) at 30° inclination (45° clinically). The six remaining large implants were tested under microseparation conditions in which rim contact was initiated during heel strike of the gait cycle for 5mc. Cups were orientated at 45° inclination (60° clinically) to allow for separation of the head and cup with a reduced 50N swing phase load and a spring load applied to induce a 0.5mm medial-superior translation of the cup. Wear was determined gravimetrically at 0.5mc, 1mc and every mc after. RESULTS. Wear was low in both standard and microseparation tests, less than 1mm. 3. cumulatively over 5mc (Figure 2). Standard conditions showed a run-in wear phase over the first mc followed by negligible wear in both diameters. The run-in wear significantly increased from 0.2mm. 3. /mc in the 40mm diameter bearings to 0.5mm. 3. /mc with the larger diameter implants. Under microseparation conditions, there was low wear over the first mc, increasing to 0.28mm. 3. /mc between 1–3mc. The wear rate reduced to 0.11mm. 3. /mc from 3=5mc. Stripe wear was evidenced on the microseparated components. There were no incidences of fracture or squeaking. DISCUSSION. Biolox Delta is known for its low wear rates but published results have only reported testing up to ⊘36mm [2]. Increasing the diameter to 64mm showed increased wear compared to smaller diameters but this was only significant over the first mc suggesting similar performance long term. Microseparation testing of these large sized bearings doubled the cumulative wear produced over 5mc but wear measured was still much lower than other bearing combinations. Wear of metal-on-metal resurfacing implants under these high angle, microseparation conditions has been reported up to 10.5mm. 3. /mc [3], significantly higher than any wear rate reported in the current study. Despite the 3mm wall thickness, no fracture of the cup occurred but stripe wear was observed in the ceramic components. SIGNIFICANCE. Biolox Delta ceramic is appropriate for use in larger diameters without excessive wear or damage to the bearings. The improved biocompatibility of the material may allow for hip resurfacing to be offered to more patients than currently available. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to compare pre-operative acetabular cup parameters using this novel dynamic imaging sequence to the Lewinnek safe zone. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 350 consecutive primary THAs that underwent dynamic pre-operative acetabular cup planning utilizing a pre-operative CT scan to capture the individual's hip anatomy, followed by standing (posterior pelvic tilt), sitting (anterior pelvic tilt), and supine X-rays. Using these inputs, we modeled an optimal cup position for each patient. Radiographic parameters including inclination, anteversion, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and lumbar flexion were analyzed. Results. Mean age of patients was 63 years (range, 18 to 95). Mean supine pelvic tilt was 4.7o (range, −31o to 21o), standing pelvic tilt was −0.3o (range, −33o to 23o), and flex-seated pelvic tilt was −0.7o (range, −42o to 32o). Mean pelvic incidence was 54o (range, 24o to 88o) and mean lumbar flexion was 43o (range, 0o to 78o). Mean inclination was 40° (range, 34 to 49) and mean anteversion was 24° (range, 3.5 to 39). Only 56% of the dynamically planned cups were within the Lewinnek safe zone (p<0.05, Figure 1). Mean inclination and anteversion difference between dynamic and Lewinnek safe zone was 1.3o (range, 0o to 12o) and 8.9o (range, 0o to 25o), respectively. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that historical target parameters for cup inclination and anteversion significantly differ to target values obtained with the use of functional imaging. Understanding the individual spinopelvic motion for each patient allows for more accurate placement of the acetabular component, which may help to reduce the risk of dislocation, premature wear and squeaking of bearing surfaces, and improve functional outcomes

Introduction. Wear performances and fracture toughness of the alumina-matrix composite (AMC) Biolox-delta(r) are pointed out in the literature. This study is a prospective monocentric evaluation of 32 and 36 mm AMC/AMC bearing surfaces. Material and methods. 141 THA were included prospectively since 2006 in 127 patients. (62 females, 65 males, mean age 62, 2 years, mean BMI 25, 5). 134 cases were primary implantations. Mean follow-up is 40.9 months (29.8-53.4). In all patients we used the same cementless stem and cup. Clinical and radiological data were evaluated with a special attention for ceramic fracture and squeaking. Results. At follow-up mean HHS is 95.4. We faced current problems in this series (2 post-op.dislocations in non compliant patients, 1 hematoma, 3 early septic complications in immunodepressed patients). Intraoperative events were 3 non relevant femur fractures and 1 partial acetabular fracture. 4 cases needed a revision (1 cup and 1 stem loosening, 1 painful stem, 1 limb length discrepancy). No abnormal wear, osteolysis or implants migration could be detected in the other cases. No ceramic head fracture or liner chipping occurred. No patient reported squeaking. Discussion and conclusion. In this monocentric report the Delta COC articulation provides similar functional scores and survivorship as previously published ceramic on ceramic series. We did not observe ceramic fracture. Unusual rates of liner chipping have been described in an other multicentric study. According to our experience and despite the short follow-up, we suggest that those complications could be related to cup design rather than to the ceramic material

Introduction: Wear performances and fracture toughness of the alumina-matrix composite (AMC) Biolox-delta. ®. are pointed out in the literature. Clinical and radiological studies are needed to assess the potential benefits of AMC/AMC bearing surfaces. The aim of this study is the prospective evaluation of complications and risk factors in patients implanted with AMC liners and 32–36 mm AMC femoral heads. Methods: 323 consecutive patients were included prospectively since 2006. 243 were implanted for primary surgery with 32 or 36 mm ball heads for a 10–12, 6° tapers. In 80 cases, we used 32 and 36 mm Delta. ®. sleeved heads (M,L,XL) for the adaptation on 12–14,5°43 tapers or 10–12, 6° tapers (acetabular revisions in absence of stem exchange, or to increase the lenght of the femoral neck and the offset) All the clinical and radiological files were evaluated at a minimum 2 years follow-up with a special attention for the fracture risk and squeaking. Radiological data were analysed using Dicomesure. ®. software. Results: We did not face any significant problem in this series. No fracture occurred. No abnormal wear or implants migration could be detected. We did not observe squeaking phenomenons. 2 THP were revised for septic complications ; the retrivials were analysed for transformation studies(Xray diffraction method XRD). The phase transformation tetragonal to monoclinic was mild, in accordance with previous experimental data. Conclusion: The limitation of this study is its short follow-up; nevertheless the clinical results are in accordance with the previously published experimental data

Introduction:. Young patients have been reported to have a higher risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty (THA) than older cohorts, possibly to due higher activity and a higher incidence of deformity and prior surgery. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces have been proposed for use in young and active individuals due to their low wear, low risk of adverse biologic reaction, and long-term survivorship. We assessed the clinical results and long-term survivorship of uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic THA in a young patient population. Methods:. 341 total hip arthroplasties in 218 patients under 50 years of age at the time of surgery were performed were performed using alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings from August 1999 to April 2009 as part of a prospective nonrandomized study. All patients received uncemented acetabular components with flush-mounted acetabular liners using an 18 degree taper and uncemented femoral components. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 41.7 years (range 17.8–49.9 years). The minimum follow-up time was 2 years, (mean 9.1, range 2–13.9). We evaluated implant-related complications and performed Kaplan-Meier analyses to determine survivorship of the femoral and acetabular components with revision for any reason as the endpoint. Results:. There were no dislocations or failures due to osteolysis or aseptic loosening. The 13-year survivorship of all components was 95.9% (CI 91.0–98.2). The 13-year survivorship was 97.4% (CI 92.3–99.1) for the acetabular component and 98.5% (CI 95.3–99.5) for the femoral component. There were two liner fractures (0.59%) and one head fracture (0.3%), two of which were sustained as a result of a fall from significant height. There were three failures of osseointegration (0.88%), and one acetabular component dislodged (0.3%) immediately following surgery. Two patients reported nonreproducible squeaking. One hip was revised at an outside institution for unknown reasons. In conclusion, ceramic-on-ceramic THA in the young patient population is very reliable with a low revision rate and absence wear-related osteolysis. Component fracture typically occurs with high-energy trauma, and squeaking occurrence is rare in the flush-mounted ceramic liners used in our study. Conclusion. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients demonstrates excellent survivorship when uncemented titanium implants are coupled with ceramic-ceramic bearings

Introduction:. Dislocation is still one of the major complications in total hip arthroplasty. Among other factors, it is important to maximize the intended range of movement (iROM) in order to reduce the risk for prosthetic impingement and to prevent edge loading in order to avoid surface damage and squeaking. Therefore, both components should be positioned in accordance to the new combined safe-zone for correct combined version and inclination aiming for an optimal relative orientation of both components. This study shows how this optimal combined orientation of both components can be determined for a specific total hip prosthetic system and how the result can be transferred to surgery and accomplished intraoperatively using minimal-invasive stem-first technique. Material and Methods:. 829 minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasties have been performed from 2007 to 2013 in our institution. In all of these surgeries a minimal-invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) was applied. All patients were positioned supine on a proprietary orthopedic table. In 168 cases a system-specific mechanical aiming device was used intraoperatively in order to control the combined version and inclination according to the specific safe-zone by orienting the prosthetic socket in relation to the prosthetic stem. This is called “stem-first technique” meaning that the prosthetic stem dictates the orientation of the socket. It does not mean the sequence of implantation. It's specific advantage is that the stem redirects the socket if it's position is modified. It equally applies to standard, anatomic (Fig. 1) or short stems (Fig. 2). The socket orientation is not primarily referred to bony landmarks of the pelvis but to the neck of the stem. Nevertheless the surgeon has to look for sufficient fixation of the socket within the acetabular bone. Leg length was measured in the surgical field additionally and prosthetic offset was adjusted according to the preoperative planning. All other patients were operated on in our standard minimal-invasive DAA-procedure. The majority of the patients suffered from osteoarthritis, their mean age was 68 years. Results:. Optimal component orientation for each prosthesis system was derived from its 3D-model by simulating hip joint motion in the physiologic range of motion. Optimal component orientation means maximizing the area of the combined safe-zone. In the stem-first group cup orientation was in the new combined safe-zone in 94% of the cases and no squeaking or prosthetic impingement did occur in any of these patients. Leg length did not differ more than +/− 5 mm. 83% of all patients receiveda ceramic-on-ceramic articulation, one early dislocation did occur and treated by closed reduction. Conclusion:. Stem-first technique is ideally suited for the minimal-invasive direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty to control the combined orientation of the prosthetic components and to achieve excellent clinical results. It assists the surgeon in aligning the cup and the stem according to their correct combined orientation in order to get an optimal range of movement especially in young patients

The need for a more durable, metal free, non-osteolytic particle generating material in Total Hip Replacement (THR) is urgently required to reduce revision surgeries. Current used materials; ceramic, metal and UHMWPE remain discrepant for long-term use. Polyimide (MP-1™) is a high performance biopolymer, originating from aerospace industry. MP-1™ is heat resistant, highly cross-linked and exhibits a self-lubrication property required for bearings and articulating joints. Being resistant to fatigue, creep and chemicals and serializable by autoclave or irradiation, MP-1™ is ideal for medical devices. Finalizing pre-clinical testing, two patients were implanted 13 years ago after informed consent. A PM (Post Mortem) retrieval at 6.5 years, showed no measureable wear, a bland synovium, and no osteoclastic or bone marrow reaction. The 13Y patients' hip, a revision from Polyethylene wear to MP-1™, has an unchanged radiograph and is fully active (Fig. 1). The Ethical Committee approved 100 patients with a single surgeon (PJB) post-marketing trial running Delta ceramic femoral ball against MP-1™ liner. Age range is from 81 to 33 years. The younger patients now being offered MP-1™, in view of the retrieval data. The MP-1™ acetabular liner is 4mm thick, as currently used in a LIMA PF shell, which replaces polyethylene, ceramic or dual mobility options. Out of the 78 enrolled patients, 52 patients have the implant for more than 5 years. The only “Complications” in a few patients was an initial squeak which spontaneously disappears by 10 days and never returns. This is likely due to reduced clearance between head and liner and likely easily correctable. There have been no dislocations or restrictions on activity level. Oxford and Harris Hip scores along with radiology, blood and clinical examination are collected during follow-up. MP-1™ liner on Delta ceramic head in THA, or in the future with MP-1 head, looks very promising with advantages of ease of sterilization, insignificant wear, no tissue reactivity and ability to have thin section and larger femoral heads if desired for larger range of motion. MP-1™ biomaterial is used for other medical devices as well such as dental implants and trauma nails, plates and screws. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

This was a retrospective study of registry data from a National Orthopaedic Hospital for all THRs with 10-year follow-up data. Inclusion criteria were all THRs with a minimum of 10-year follow-up data. All metal-on-metal (MoM) THRs and MoM resurfacings were excluded from the analysis due to the high rate of revision associated with these bearings. Univariate and multivariate analyses controlling for confounding variables were performed to compare outcomes. A total of 1,697 THRs were performed in 1,553 patients. The four significant predictors for revision were fixation type (p<0.01), surface bearing type (p<0.01), age (P<0.05) and head size (p<0.05). Gender, BMI and approach had no effect on revision rates. The lowest 10-year all-cause revision rates were seen in cemented THRs at 1.7%. Ceramic-on-poly bearings had the lowest revision rate at only 1.2%. Metal-on-poly bearings had a 1.7% revision rate. Ceramic on ceramic bearings had a 7.1% revision rate with 1 revision for squeak and 1 revision for ceramic head fracture. The causes for revision in order of decreasing frequency were as follows: Infection (n=13, 0.7%), dislocation (n=7, 0.4%), periprosthetic fracture (n=3, 0.2%) and aseptic loosening (n=2, 0.1%). There were 2 re-revisions at 10 years in total. The smaller 22.225mm head sizes had a significantly lower revision rate than other head sizes (p<0.05). Ceramic-on-poly bearings, cemented fixation and smaller head sizes perform better in the experience of this registry. However, with multivariate analysis, these differences were shown to be insignificant

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is effective, reproducible, and durable in the treatment of hip joint arthritis. While improvements in polyethylene materials have significantly reduced wear rates and osteolysis, aseptic loosening of implants remains one of the leading causes of revision THA. Additionally, fears of dislocation and instability have driven the increase in the utilization of larger diameter femoral heads in primary THA which can lead to increased wear when coupled with a polyethylene articulation. Finally, the increasing number of younger and active patients undergoing THA raises questions with regards to the ability of modern conventional bearings to provide durability and longevity beyond second and third decades following joint implantation. Ceramic-on-ceramic articulations are ideally suited for today's young and high demand patients undergoing primary THA. It has the lowest in-vitro wear properties of any bearing couple and the wear characteristics are further improved by its wettability and lubrication particularly when larger heads are utilised. Additionally, improvements in material properties and prosthesis design have significantly decreased fracture rates and increased the reliability of these implants. Furthermore, reported outcomes and longevity of modern ceramic-on-ceramic THAs in younger patients have all shown excellent survivorship despite patients achieving and maintaining a very high level of activity and function. In short, it is the bearing couple most in tune with current market demands and utilization trends. While registry data and meta-analyses of published literature have failed to show the superiority of ceramic-on-ceramic articulations compared to conventional bearings at 10 years, there is evidence that even highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXPE) is not immune to wear. Selvarajah et al. reported steady, in-vivo wear rates of HXPE exceeding 0.1mm/year threshold in young THA patients with 36mm ceramic ball heads. Additionally, small osteolytic lesions have been observed in hips with HXPE bearings at 12–14 years follow up. Finally, analysis of all controlled randomised studies have shown less osteolysis of ceramic-on-ceramic hips compared to polyethylene articulations. The significance of these lesions are unclear but the question remains: Can HXPE as a bearing be able to provide over 30 years of service needed to outlast patients younger than 60 years?. Concerns with cost, squeaking, and fractures do not make ceramic-on-ceramic bearings suitable for all patients undergoing primary THA. However, in young, healthy and active patients, a modern ceramic- on-ceramic articulation is most likely to provide the lowest wear rates, lowest risk of osteolysis, and greatest chance for life-long durability

Introduction: The use of hard-on-hard hip prostheses has highlighted specific problems like the “stripe-wear” and the squeaking. Many authors have related these phenomena to a micro-separation between the cup and the head. The goal of the study was to model the hip kinematics under micro-separation regime in order to develop a computational simulator for total hip prosthesis including a joint laxity, and to use it to perform a sound analysis. Method: A three-dimensional model of the Leeds II hip simulator was developed on ADAMS. ®. software. A spring was used to introduce a controlled micro-separation (less than 500 microns) during the swing phase of the walking cycle. The increase of the load during the stance phase induced a relocation of the head in the cup. Values of the medial-lateral separation predicted from the model were compared to experimental data measured using a LVDT of less than 5 microns precision. Theoretical wear path predicted from the model was compared to the literature data. The frequencies of the vibratory phenomena were determined, using the Fourier transformation. Results: There was an excellent correlation between the theoretical prediction and the experimental measurement of the medial-lateral separation during the walking cycle (0.92). Edge-loading contact occurred during 57% of the cycle according to the model and 47% according to the experimental data. Velocity and acceleration were increased during the relocation phase in a chaotic manner, leading to vibration. The contact force according to the model had also a chaotic variation during the micro-separation phase, suggesting a chattering movement. Fourier transformation showed many frequencies in the audible area. Discussion: A three-dimensional computational model of the kinematics of the hip after total replacement was developed and validated with an excellent precision under microseparation. It highlighted possible explanations for the squeaking that may occur during either relocation phase or edge loading

Purpose: The ideal bearing surface for total hip arthroplasty is still an area of debate. Increasing numbers of total hip replacements are being done in the younger patient population. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have gained popularity due to their low wear rate; however, ceramic fractures with subsequent catastrophic failures have been reported and squeaking of ceramic hips is an emerging problem. This study reports on early results of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. Method: This is a study analyzing prospectively collected data for 120 alumina-on-alumina total hip replacements with minimum follow up of 24 months. Average age at time of surgery was 49 years. The main outcome of the study was to identify complications related to the pros-theses. Standard outcome measures (SF-12, Harris Hip Score, and WOMAC) were also collected at clinic visits. Results: All patients received either a Stryker Trident acetabular cup with Secure-fit Plus stem or Depuy Pinnacle cup with an AML stem. Average follow-up was five years (range: two – nine years). No revisions were performed for loosening or catastrophic failures. No wear, loosening, or osteolysis was seen on radiographs. The SF-12, WOMAC, and Harris Hip scores were not significantly different from other reported hip series. The most common complication has been the “squeaking” hip. To date we have had six squeaky hips in our centre, three of which have been revised. All the squeaking hips received the Trident acetabular cup (Stryker) which has a circumferential metal lip to protect the ceramic bearing. This metal flange can affect range of motion and predispose patients to earlier impingement (particularly if a minus 3 head is utilized). One patient with a Depuy hip complains of intermittent pain and radiographs show some fragmentation, but the hip has not been revised. Conclusion: Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty may provide a more durable prosthesis with outcomes similar to standard THA, especially in young and active patients; however, caution should be used if considering the Stryker Trident shell due to the large number of “squeaky hips”

The use of hard-on-hard hip prostheses has highlighted specific problems like the “stripe-wear” and the squeaking. Many authors have related these phenomena to a micro-separation between the cup and the head. The goal of the study was to model the hip kinematics under micro-separation regime in order to develop a computational simulator for total hip prosthesis including a joint laxity, and to use it to perform a sound analysis. A three-dimensional model of the Leeds II hip simulator was developed on ADAMS® software. A spring was used to introduce a controlled micro-separation (less than 500 microns) during the swing phase of the walking cycle. The increase of the load during the stance phase induced a relocation of the head in the cup. Values of the medial-lateral separation predicted from the model were compared to experimental data measured using a LVDT of less than 5 microns precision. Theoretical wear path predicted from the model was compared to the literature data. The frequencies of the vibratory phenomena were determined, using the Fourier transformation. There was an excellent correlation between the theoretical prediction and the experimental measurement of the medial-lateral separation during the walking cycle (0.92). Edge-loading contact occurred during 57% of the cycle according to the model and 47% according to the experimental data. Velocity and acceleration were increased during the relocation phase in a chaotic manner, leading to vibration. The contact force according to the model had also a chaotic variation during the micro-separation phase, suggesting a chattering movement. Fourier transformation showed many frequencies in the audible area. A three-dimensional computational model of the kinematics of the hip after total replacement was developed and validated with an excellent precision under micro separation. It highlighted possible explanations for the squeaking that may occur during either relocation phase or edge loading

The selection of an acetabular component for primary hip arthroplasty has narrowed significantly over the past 10 years. Although monoblock components demonstrated excellent long-term success the difficulty with insertion and failure to fully appreciate full coaptation of contact with the acetabular floor has led to almost complete elimination of its utilization. Modular acetabular components usually with titanium shells and highly crosslinked polyethylene are by far the most utilised today. This is particularly true with mid-term results demonstrating excellent wear rates and extremely low failure rates and the concern of possible mechanical failure of highly crosslinked polyethylene not being a clinical problem. Ceramic liners are also used but problems with squeaking articulations and liner chipping have made highly crosslinked polyethylene the preferred liner material. Metal-on-metal except in surface replacement arthroplasty is rarely used in primary hip arthroplasty. With instability in total hip replacement still being a significant and the leading cause of revision hip replacement the dual mobility articulation has emerged as an increasingly used acetabular component. This is composed of either a monoblock cobalt chrome socket articulating with a large polyethylene liner into which the femoral head is constrained. The polyethylene liner becomes essentially a larger femoral head articulation and hip stability is significantly improved. A modular dual mobility can also be utilised with a titanium shell and a cobalt chrome liner inserted into the shell and then a dual mobility articulation. In a recent series of 182 dual mobility cups, all monoblock ADM, in high risk patients undergoing primary total hip replacement there was 1 interprosthetic dislocation which occurred during reduction of a dislocation. Average follow up was 4.4 years with a range of 2–6.6 years

Introduction:. Femoral head surface roughness has been recognized as an important determinant of linear and volumetric polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear in total hip replacement (THR), particularly for metal heads. Fisher et al. 1. found that a 2- μm scratch with a 1- μm buildup of metal debris produced a 70-fold increase in the wear rate. Ceramic materials and hard-on-hard bearing couples have been introduced to provide more scratch resistance. However, THR bearing surfaces of all materials can become damaged during in vivo function, potentially impacting wettability. The purpose of this study is to quantify surface roughness as related to distinct damage types on retrieved femoral heads and to assess wettability of common bearing materials. Materials and Methods:. An IRB-approved archive of retrieved THR bearing components was queried, identifying 29 metal (CoCr) and ceramic (alumina, zirconia) femoral heads that had articulated with UHMWPE and ceramic acetabular liners, respectively. Mean in vivo functional duration was 5.5 ± 4.5 years (range, 1 month to 27 yrs), and patient age and weight averaged 68 ± 12 years (range, 36–81) and 72 ± 21 kilograms (range, 52–123), respectively. Retrieval reasons were dislocation (18), loosening (4), polyethylene wear (2), infection (1), squeaking (1) and unknown (3). Damage appearance and surface roughness were evaluated in a grid pattern of 49 zones distributed across the bearing surface of each head using optical microscopy to identify Mode-1 or Mode-2 wear and a non-contact interferometer (NT2000 & NPFLEX, Bruker Corp.) Wettability of smooth and rough CoCr and alumina materials was assessed using contact angle measurements (DSA30, Krüss USA). Results:. Among the metal heads, scratching was the most common damage (Mode-1) and was visualized on over 90% of all heads. Metal transfer and discoloration (Mode-2) damage, confirmed as titanium deposits, was visualized on 79% of dislocated heads. Zones with metal transfer had significantly higher surface roughness compared to zones without this damage (Table 1, p < 0.001). Among the ceramic heads, Mode-1 wear was visualized as a long, narrow wear region consistent with stripe wear. 2. and metal transfer (Mode-2) was visualized as dark smears similar to previous studies. 3. Areas of roughening (Mode-1 & Mode-2) exhibited significantly higher surface roughness than areas without such damage (Table 2). When comparing wettability, the contact angle for alumina (32.8°) was lower than CoCr (54.5°) and both materials had significantly higher contact angles with increased surface roughness. Conclusions:. Damage mechanisms leading to Mode-1 and Mode-2 wear were visualized on both metal and ceramic heads, leading to significant increases in surface roughness. However, the surface morphology of each damage mode differed between material types (Figure 3). These results, along with the empirical evidence relating surface roughness and wettability, have implications for wear and the ability to maintain suitable fluid films between bearing surfaces. Continued investigation into clinical phenomena possibly related to these parameters, such as squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. 4. or accelerated wear in metal-on-metal bearings,. 5. is warranted

A common feature of retrieved ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) hips is the presence of metal transfer on the femoral head. This metal transfer represents an important change in the articulating surface and can have consequences in terms of lubrication, friction, wear, and squeaking. Given the potential impact of metal transfer on the performance of CoC bearing couples, a good understanding of the factors surrounding its occurrence is warranted. This study documents the metal transfer onto a ceramic femoral head with two subluxations onto the rim of the cup which occurred during surgery. This metal transfer is compared to that on other ceramic heads retrieved for various reported reasons, including squeaking, pain and loosening. The first ten retrieved alumina heads of current ceramic technology (Ceramtec, Plochingen, Germany) submitted to our retrieval laboratory were assessed to document the phenomenon of metal transfer. Nine devices underwent in vivo service (mean duration 32 mo., range 13 to 84) and the tenth device was removed intra-operatively and serves as an instructive control case. It was impacted onto a trunnion and during final testing for stability subluxed anteriorly over the titanium lip of the cup. The metal transfer was immediately noted by the surgeon and the head was removed. All ceramic heads were examined under light microscopy (Nikon Dissecting Microscope, Tokyo, Japan) and white light optical profilometry (NewView 7300, Zygo, Middlefield, CT). The control ceramic head showed two distinct metal transfer streaks from two discrete subluxation events that were documented by the surgeon (IMT). Those streaks are aligned in a direction approximately 24o to the right (clockwise) of a line through the polar apex of the head and parallel to the axis of the femoral neck. Microscopy and profilometry indicate that they were laid down in a direction from equator-toward-pole. Seven of the retrieved ceramic heads showed streaks of metal transfer that are very similar to those on the control ceramic head in terms of: alignment (equator-toward-pole, 20 to 45o off-axis) width (tapered point growing to approximately 1.0 to 1.5 mm), depth of metal deposition (0.25 to 0.40 μm), and depositional texture. It is notable that the metal transfer streaks commonly observed on retrievals bear a close resemblance to that caused by a single intra-operative event wherein a hip abduction force pulled the head into contact with the titanium cup/liner rim. An important implication is that this demonstrates that metal transfer can occur with a single instance of rim contact, wherein the femoral head is forced against the metal cup rim. If metal transfer onto the head were to occur during final reduction of the hip, its presence may well be undetected and any deleterious in vivo impact of the metal transfer would be in effect from the day of surgery

Ceramic-on-ceramic was shown to have advantageous tribologic properties (low wear and friction). For medical applications two ceramics, alumina and zircona, are available. This case study shows that the combination of different ceramics for hard-hard pairings can be critical. A 57 year old patient received a total hip prosthesis (cementless stem with a ceramic head and a monolithic ceramic cup). Thirty-five months postoperatively the patient complained about squeaking noises during walking and stair climbing. Clinical diagnoses showed a good range of motion and no signs of loosening. Conventional rehabilitation did not improve the situation and 43 months after primary surgery the cup and the head had to be revised on the patients request. Intraoperatively no loosening indications were found. The explanted components were analysed using a 3D co-ordinate measuring machine. The head and the cup were made of different ceramics. The zirconia (ZrO2) head occurred rather white whereas the alumina (Al2O3) cup was yellow-reddish. The inner articulating surface of the cup showed no decoloration or wear. The surface of the head contained mated areas with surface defects in equatorial regions (maximum wear depth 9μm). The head and the cup were combined from different manufacturers. The distinct surface changes and wear marks of the zirconia head probably caused the squeaking noise after 3 years in situ. Zirconia for medical applications is generally Y-TZP ceramic. Pressure, heating, and water can cause severe surface embrittlement. Pre-damaging due to the manufacturing process or friction in the joint might be the mechanism leading to pre-mature wear and failure. Joint components from different manufacturers should only be implanted with proper official authorisation

The new technology using femoral heads with sleeves allows conservative procedures for revision hip arthroplasty. The implantation of classical ceramic heads on a previously used femoral taper is not recommanded. When there is no loosening of the femoral implant, the use of sleeves is a good solution for using an alumine on alumine couple, specially in young and active patients. Material and methods: 25 hips in 25 patients were included. In 12 cases the cause of revision was an acetabular osteolysis with or without loosening in metal on metal cimented THR. In 13 patients the revision was performed for a loosening and a wear of the PHE cup with osteolysis (4 zyrcon and 9 chrome-cobalt heads). The mean age was 49 years for the metal on metal revisions (36 to 75) and 54 years for the prosthesis using a polyethylen socket. Cementless cups were implanted using XLW delta alumina inserts. The 32 mm delta alumina sleeved heads were adjusted on the existing femoral 12–14 tapers. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and followed-up with clinical and radiological examinations. Results: At 2 years mean follow-up, average Harris Hip Score was significantly improved (97 vs 54, p< 0.05). We did not observe ceramic fracture or squeaking. The radiographic results did not demonstrate acetabular loosening, osteolysis, or femoral abnormalities. Concerning the metal on metal revisions, the aseptic loosening of the socket was combined with high rates of cobalt and chromium serum levels. Mean delay before revision was 4 years (2 to 11). Unipolar acetabular revisions were only decided after a carefull inspection of the remaining stems to detect any taper alteration or impingement lesions. Postoperative cobalt and chromium serum levels significantly decreased postoperatively. Concerning the metal on PHE and the zyrcon on PHE revisions, the mean delay before revison was 11 years (4 to 21). At this short follow up, we did not notice any parasitic impingement due to the additional sleeve or any ceramic fracture or squeaking. The radiographic results did not demonstrate acetabular loosening, osteolysis, or femoral abnormalities. Discussion: Failures of metal-on-metal or metal on PHE hip arthroplasties raise new technical problems. Conversion to ceramic on ceramic has been suggested in case of hypersensibility reactions or high rate of serum metal ions, and in case of osteolysis in young population. This prospective study evaluates a revision strategy using ceramic cups and delta ceramic heads with titanium adapter sleeves when a femoral revision is not required. Despite the limitation due to short follow-up, this technical option should be considered when wear surfaces exchange is decided

Introduction. Increasing numbers and incidence rates of noisy (squeaking, scratching or clicking) ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties (THA) are being reported. The etiology seems to always involve stripe wear producing a stick-slip effect in the bearing which excites vibrations. As stripe wear is also found in silent CoC bearings, a theory has been developed that the vibrations become audible only via amplification through the vibrating stem. This was supported by showing that the excitation frequency and the resonance frequency of the plain stem are similar [1]. However, stem resonance in-vivo would be influenced by the periprosthetic bone damping and transmitting stem vibrations. Thus, if stem resonance is conditional for noisy COC hips, these should show periprosthetic bone different to silent hips. This study compares stem fit&fill and periprosthetic bone between noisy and silent CoC hips. Methods. In a consecutive series of 186 primary CoC hips with identical stems, cups (Stryker ABG-II) and femoral heads (Alumina V40, 28mm) a dedicated patient questionnaire [2] identified 38 noisy hips (incidence rate: 20.4%, squeakers: n=23). Stem fit&fill and cortical wall thickness (CWT, medial and lateral) were measured on post-op AP x-rays according to an established method [3, Fig 1]. Measurements were repeated by a single blinded observer in a control group of silent hips matched for gender, age, stem size and follow-up time (4.6yrs). Fit&fill and CWT were compared between the noisy and silent group at proximal, mid-stem and distal level and on the medial and lateral side. Results. The endosteal canal width was equal in noisy (N) and silent hips (S) at all levels (e.g. proximal: N=39.7±5.5mm, S=41.3±5.7mm, Fig 2). On the lateral side also cortical wall thickness (CWT) was the same at all levels (e.g. proximal: N=2.0±0.8mm, S=1.9±0.9mm). However, on the medial side, noisy hips had higher CWT at proximal (N=4.9±2.8mm, S=3.0±2.1mm, p<0.01) and mid-stem level (N=6.2±2.1mm, N=4.6±1.7mm, p<0.001). Also Fit&fill was slightly higher (proximal: N=66%, S=62%; mid-stem: N=63%, S=59%, p<0.05). Differences and significance levels increased when in the noise group only squeakers were considered. The mid-stem line, assumed to sit distal to LT, actually cut through LT significantly more often in the noisy (18/38) than in the silent group (9/38, p=0.02) indicating a tendency of noisy stems to sit more proximally. Discussion. Despite equal endosteal canal widths and lateral cortical wall thickness for noisy and silent hips, noisy hips had significantly thicker medial walls at proximal (+63%) and mid-stem level (+35%) where also fit&fill was higher. Noisy stems also sat more proximal (Fig. 3). This gives evidence that periprosthetic bone (PPB) may play a role in the development of audible noise in CoC hips by providing particular conditions of support, damping and transmission for an oscillating stem which influences noise frequency and intensity. Comparing PPB at different time points indicated that the differences are less due to post-op remodeling but more to pre-op conditions o

Introduction: Increasing numbers and incidence rates of noisy (squeaking, scratching, clicking) ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties (THA) are being reported. The etiology seems to always involve stripe wear producing a stick-slip effect in the bearing which excites vibrations. As stripe wear is also found in silent CoC bearings, a theory has been developed that the vibrations become audible only via amplification through the vibrating stem (bell-clapper theory). This was supported by showing that the excitation frequency and the resonance frequency of the plain stem are similar. However, stem resonance in-vivo would be influenced by the periprosthetic bone damping and transmitting stem vibrations. Thus, if the bell-clapper theory were true, noisy CoC hips should show periprosthetic bone different to silent hips. This study compares stem fit& fill and periprosthetic bone between noisy and silent CoC hips. Methods: In a consecutive series of 186 primary CoC hips with identical stems, cups (Stryker ABG-II) and femoral heads (Alumina V40, 28mm) a survey identified 38 noisy hips (incidence rate: 20.4%, squeakers: n=23). Stem fit& fill and cortical wall thickness (CWT, medial and lateral) were measured on post-op AP x-rays according to the method of Kim & Kim. Measurements were repeated by a single blinded observer in a control group of silent hips matched for gender, age, stem size and follow-up time (4.6yrs). Fit& fill and CWT were compared between the noisy and silent group at proximal, mid-stem and distal level and on the medial and lateral side. Results: The endosteal canal width was equal in noisy (N) and silent hips (S) at all levels (e.g. proximal: N=39.7+/−5.5mm, S=41.3+/−5.7mm). On the lateral side also cortical wall thickness (CWT) was the same at all levels (e.g. proximal: N=2.0+/−0.8mm, S=1.9+/−0.9mm). However, on the medial side, noisy hips had higher CWT at proximal (N=4.9+/−2.8mm, S=3.0+/−2.1mm, p< 0.01) and mid-stem level (N=6.2+/−2.1mm, N=4.6+/−1.7mm, p< 0.001). Also Fit& fill was slightly higher (proximal: N=66%, S=62%; mid-stem: N=63%, S=59%, p< 0.05). Differences and significance levels increased when only squeakers were considered. Discussion: Despite equal endosteal canal widths and lateral cortical wall thickness for noisy and silent hips, noisy hips had sign. thicker medial walls at proximal (+63%) and mid-stem level (+35%) where also fit& fill was higher. This gives evidence that periprosthetic bone (PPB) may play a role in the development of audible noise in CoC hips by providing particular conditions of support, damping and transmission for an oscillating stem which influences noise frequency and intensity. Comparing PPB at different time points indicated that the differences are less due to post-op remodeling but more to pre-op conditions, surgical canal preparation and possibly stem design. The findings shall be verified by a DEXA study

Aims

The benefit of a dual-mobility acetabular component (DMC) for primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) is controversial. This study aimed to compare the dislocation and complication rates when using a DMC compared to single-mobility (SM) acetabular component in primary elective THA using data collected at a single centre, and compare the revision rates and survival outcomes in these two groups.

While squeaking ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty are increasingly reported in the literature, the etiology remains unclear. Cup inclination and anteversion have been correlated with the phenomenon but even amongst well positioned cups bearing noise is observed. Most studies do not distinguish between different types of noise or incidence rate and do only investigate actively complaining patients. This study analysed the incidence of ceramic bearing noise in a single type of hip implant and investigates correlations with patient, implant and surgery parameters. In a consecutive series of 145 ceramic-on-ceramic primary hips (Stryker ABG-II, 28mm head) in 132 patients (m/f=72/60, avg. age=54yrs) and an average follow-up of 3.0 (1–7) years, noisy bearings were identified by a patient questionnaires stating the type of noise (squeaking, clicking, scratching, combinations), time of initial incidence, incidence rate (permanent, often, sometimes, rare) and type of movement. Patient demographics (age, gender, height, weight, BMI, side of surgery, leg length difference), implant parameters (cup and stem size, neck length) and surgery parameters (cup and stem position, leg length correction) were recorded and compared between the noisy and silent groups (t-test, Fisher Exact test). Twenty-eight noisy hips (19.3%) were identified with 14 patients reporting squeaking, 16 clicking and 5 scratching including 7 with a combination of noises. Quasi permanent noises were reported for 7 hips (2 often) but in 17 cases the noise appeared only sometimes (2 rare). The average time of first incidence was 1.74 years port-op with 7 hips reporting noise directly after operation and 15 after 2 years or more. Silent and noisy hips were statistically not different regarding age, gender, follow-up time, side of operation, height, weight, BMI, cup and stem size, leg length difference or stem position. Significant differences were identified with the noise group having a steeper cup inclination (49.9° vs 46.9°, p< 0.05) and less frequent shorter (−2.7mm) necks (0 vs 22%, p< 0.01) but more frequent longer (+4mm) necks (50% vs 37%, p< 0.05). Leg length correction was performed less frequent (31 vs 55%, p< 0.01). In the noise group 5 (17%) and in the silent group only 1 (0.9%) cup revisions was performed (p< 0.01). The incidence of noisy ceramic bearings was higher than usually reported (< 5%) as not only actively complaining subjects but all patients were interviewed. Cup position was confirmed to be a contributing factor but patient weight, height or BMI did not play a role. However, the use of long necks, the absence of short necks and less frequently performed leg length corrections significantly contributed to producing bearing noise. Biomechanical restoration, preoperative planning and soft tissue tension seem to be important factors in bearing noise etiology

A ceramic is currently considered as the most ideal articulation in primary THA. The authors evaluated clinicoradiographic results and complications of cementless THA with 3rd generation of ceramic bearing. From April 2001 to January 2008, 310 primary THAs were performed in 300 patients using 3rd generation of ceramic bearing. In results, Harris hip score at last follow up was improved to an average of 95.4 points from 51.6 points preoperatively. In all cases, fixations around implants were stable and there was no osteolysis. Complications were dislocations, squeaking, ceramic femoral head and liner fracture. Our outcomes using cementless THA with 3rd generation of ceramic articulation were satisfactory, but more clinical study and investigation will be necessary to reduce complications

Purpose. The fourth generation ceramic, in which zirconia is incorporated into the alumina matrix, was developed to reduce the risk of ceramic fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, clinical and radiographic results, and bearing-related failures associated with total hip arthroplasty using zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings over a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Materials and methods. We retrospectively analysed 135 patients (151 hips) who underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty using zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. There were 58 men and 77 women with mean age of 55.9 years (range, 20 to 82 years) at index surgery. Acetabular and femoral components were cementless in all hips. A 36 mm head was used in 81 of 151 hips and a 32 mm head was used in 70 hips with smaller acetabular shells. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.1 years (range, 5 to 6.8 years). Results. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with an end point of revision for any reason was 100% at 6.8 years. All acetabular and femoral components showed bony ingrowth. No radiographic evidence of osteolysis was identified. No ceramic fracture occurred. There were 4 (2.6%) noisy hips (1 squeaking and 3 clickings), but no patient could reproduce the noise and required revision. Other complications included one iliopsoas tendonitis and one dislocation. Conclusions. The minimum 5-year results of total hip arthroplasties performed using 32 mm or 36 mm zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were encouraging with excellent survivorship. However, it was also found that the risk of noise development remains even for the newest generation of ceramics

Aims

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a very successful and cost-effective operation, yet debate continues about the optimum fixation philosophy in different age groups. The concept of the 'cementless paradox' and the UK 'Getting it Right First Time' initiative encourage increased use of cemented fixation due to purported lower revision rates, especially in elderly patients, and decreased cost.

Purpose. The results of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing surfaces in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were well known. However, it was not known in revision THA. The purpose of this study is to report the results of revision THA with ceramic articulation. Materials and Methods. 112 revision THAs with ceramic articulation were evaluated. The mean age at the time of surgery was 58.3 years (28 to 97). The mean duration of the follow-up periods was 6.4 years (2 to 11.8 years). Results. The Harris hip scores improved from an average of 79.0 at the index surgery to an average of 91.1 at the last follow-up. (P<0.001) None of hips showed osteolysis or ceramic head fracture. One hip shows aseptic loosening in the acetabular components with squeaking that caused a re-revision. There were nine cases of dislocation. The overall survival rate of the implants was 85.1% (95% confidence interval, 61.7% to 94.0%) at ten years with revision for any reason as the end point. Conclusion. The ceramic articulation is one of good bearing options for revision THA in patients with a long life expectancy

Introduction. Proximal short stems have gained in popularity for perceived bone preservation but more recently, physiological loading. We report the medium term success of a calcar loading, short stem in a large cohort from a single unit with multiple surgeons. Patients/Materials & Methods. Prospectively collected sequential data, with no loss to follow-up, was retrospectively analysed from our own local database. Demographic data was assimilated to collect age, sex, BMI smoking history. Revision cases were analysed for cause and a PTIR and Kaplan Meier Curve constructed to quantify survival. Radiographs reviewed in 100 of the oldest (2009 to 2011) cases to look specifically for calcar resorption and stem sink. Imatri software was used for calculations: sink was categorised into greater or less than 0.5cm; calcar resorption was estimated using maximal osteotomy surface change of slope. Patient pre-operative and post-operative outcome scores (using Harris Hip, Charnley and Oxford scales) were extracted from the database. Results. 752 cases (in 685 patients) were identified: 313 male, 372 females with a combined average age of 61 (19 to 84); and, an average BMI of 29 kg/m. 2. ; (18–49); and, 4% were noted to be smoking on their last assessment with a maximum implantation of 9 (average 4.2) years. 74% (556) of cases utilised a 36mm Solid Ceramic head but 28, 32, 40 and 44mm heads in CrCo and TiN were also used. The majority (84%) of cases were performed for Osteoarthritis (Inflammatory arthropathy was a relative contraindication); but, 22 cases were performed for revision from a resurfacing arthroplasty. 17 patients were noted to have died (all more than 90 days post-operatively). 14 cases were revised for any cause (1.8%): 5 for cup related reasons (including dislocation); 4 deep infection, 2 for failure of fixation; 3 for periprosthetic fracture. All failures occurred within the first 4.5 years and all within the first 100 cases for each surgeon. The KM survival curve gave a 5 year survival (185 at risk) of 96.1% all causes and 99.1% for femur only. The PTIR (non-competing) was 6.5 (per 1000 years exposed) and 6.3 (competing). No reported cases of thigh pain were observed; one ceramic on ceramic bearing reported transient but recurrent squeak within the first 2 years before settling. Average sink was less than 1mm but greater than 0.5cm in 5 cases (2 of which required revision for non-fixation). All sink occurred within the first 6 months. Calcar resorption was only noted in 3 cases and was greater than 45° from the prosthesis bone interface. Discussion. Our results are similar to unpublished, smaller outcomes of the same stem in other centres. Two relatively new modes of failure were noted with sink and early periprosthetic fracture accounting for 56% of stem related failures. In this novel designed stem, there appears to be a narrow window between under and over-sizing with the methods of failure of sink or fracture probable

Expectations for ceramic-on-metal (COM) bearings included (i) optimal lubrication due to smoother ceramic heads (ii), reduction of metal ions due to elimination of CoCr heads, and (iii) ‘differential hardness’ reducing adhesive wear and squeaking (Firkins 2001, Williams 2007). Additional benefits included (iv) use of heads larger than for ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), (v) reduction in taper corrosion and (vi) simulator studies clearly demonstrated metal ions and wear both reduced compared to MOM (Firkins 2001, Williams 2007, Ishida 2007). However, contemporary ‘3rd body wear’ paradigms focused only on metal debris size range 0.025–0.035um (Firkins 2001). Thus, neglected was the effect of hip impingement, provoking release of large metal particles sized 20–200um (Clarke 2013). In this study, we compared COM retrievals using hypotheses that adverse COM cases would demonstrate a combination of (a) steeply inclined cups, (b) liner “edge-loading”, (c) Ti6Al4V contamination on ceramic, and (d) evidence of 3rd-body CoCr wear by large particles. As a case example, this 51-year old female had her metal-polyethylene (MPE) bearing revised to COM in June 2011. She reported no symptoms 1-year post-op, but scans revealed a palpable mass in the inguinal region of left hip. By March 2013 the patient reported mild pain in her hip, which progressed to severe by April 2014. Scans showed a solid and cystic iliopsoas bursitis while cup position had changed from 43o to 73o inclination. Revision was performed in June 2014, her joint tissues were found extensively stained due to metal contamination, and histology described formation of a large pseudotumor. Analysis of retrieved components was by interferometry, SEM and EDS. Detailed maps were made of wear areas in heads and cups and volumetric wear was determined by CMM techniques. This adverse COM example revealed large diametral mismatch (595um) compared to COM controls (75–115um). The ceramic head had a broad polar stripe of CoCr contamination, roughness 0.1–0.3um high. Equatorial ceramic areas showed arrays of thin metal smears that demonstrated elemental Ti and Al. The CoCr liner revealed wear area into cup rim, as “edge loading”, and also featured a focal rim-defect over 18o circumferential arc. Liner scratches were 20um wide and larger, and wear-rate of CoCr liner averaged approximately 50mm3 per year. In contrast, ceramic head had minimal wear. Our study highlights the underappreciated risk of impingement by metallic prosthetic components. Prior studies of ceramic heads showed black metallic smears. With COM we can anticipate that the broad polar smear will be CoCr alloy (wear of liner on head). However, Ti6Al4V smearing on ceramic heads is a notable signpost indicating impingement by the Ti6Al4V acetabular shell. The femoral neck (Ti6Al4V: CoCr), may also be damaged. Release of large metal particles, 1500-times larger than prior predictions, provoke a particularly adverse ‘3rd body wear’ (Halim, 2015). Such cases confirm our four hypotheses, that COM bearings will then fail in a way similar to MOM. In contrast, COC bearings are immune to such impingement and 3rd-body metal damage

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings are considered in several European and Asian countries a reliable alternative to metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-polyethylene, or metal-on-metal (with small diameter heads) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) management. Reduced joint wear and limited peri-prosthetic osteolytic changes are the main reasons supporting the use of ceramic. So far, the available observational data show a low rate of revision following the use of Ceramic-on-Ceramic bearings, but concern remains regarding the risk of fracture and the prevalence of squeaking noises from the joint. The objective of this study was to use a national arthroplasty registry to assess whether the choice of bearings – metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), or metal-on-metal (MoM) – is associated with differences in the risk of revision. Data from primary THAs were extracted from the New Zealand Joint Registry over a 15-year period. 97,889 hips were available for analysis. The mean age of patients was 68 years (SD +/− 11 years), and 52% were women. The median followup period in this patient population was 9 years (range, 1 to 15 years). The primary endpoint was revision for any reason. Inclusion criteria were degenerative joint disease (84,894), exclusion criteria were previous surgery, trauma, and any other diagnosis (12,566). We also excluded patients operated on with a Ceramic-on-Metal THA, because of the small recorded number (429). There were 54,409 (64.1%) MoP, 16,503 (19.4%) CoP, 9,051 (10.7%) CoC and 4,931 (5.8%) MoM hip arthroplasties. 3,555 hips were revised during the 15-year observation period. A multivariate assessment was carried out including the following risks factors available for analysis: age, gender, surgeon experience, use of cement. Analysis of bearing surface type and revision showed a statistically significant lower risk for CoC hips (265 THAs, p≤0.01) when compared with CoP (537 THAs, HR 1.07, CI 0,92–1,26), MoP (2186 THAs, HR 1.39, CI 1.19–1,62), and MoM (576 THAs, HR 2.15, CI 1.84–2.51). The 15-year follow-up Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows a 92% revision-free rate for CoC THAs (Figure 1). In particular, CoC THAs showed the lowest rates of revision for dislocation and for deep infection, when compared with the other bearings. This registry study showed that the bearing surface is associated with the risk of revision. MoM bearing surfaces showed a high rate of revisions, while CoC THAs showed the lowest rate of revision compared to other bearing surfaces. Low wear and less osteolysis are the possible reasons for reduced risk of revision for aseptic loosening. We postulate that the healthy, fibrotic synovial-like pseudocapsule found in CoC THAs preserves the long-term stability of the joint and reduces the bio-burden for late deep infection. Future studies with larger data sets and longer follow-up should continue to investigate this query. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Aims

This study reports the ten-year wear rates, incidence of osteolysis, clinical outcomes, and complications of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing oxidized zirconium (OxZr) versus cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Introduction. Malpositioning of the acetabular cup during total hip arthroplasty increases the risk of dislocation, edge loading, squeaking and can be responsible for early wear and loosening. We hypothesized that the use of three-dimensional visualization tools showing during surgery the planned cup position relatively to the acetabular edge would increase the accuracy of cup orientation. The purpose of this study was to compare 3D planning-assisted with freehand insertion of the acetabular cup. Methods. A randomized, controlled, prospective study of two groups of twenty eight patients each was performed. In the first group, cup positioning was guided by 3D views of the cup within the acetabulum based on a three-dimensional preoperative planning (Figure 1). In the control group, the cup was placed freehand. All of the patients were operated on by the same surgeon through a direct anterior approach in supine position. Cup anteversion and abduction angles were measured on three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions for each patient by an independent observer. We analyzed the accuracy of both methods. The main evaluation criterion was the percentage of outliers according to the Lewinneck safe zone. Results. There was no difference in surgery time between the two groups. The cup anteversion angle was restored with a higher accuracy in the 3D-assisted group (−2.7 ± 5.4°) comparatively to the freehand-placement group (6.6 ± 9.5°, p<0.0008) (Figure 2). The percentage of outliers was twice lower in the 3D guided group (21%, 6 patients) comparatively to the control group (46%, thirteen of twenty eight p=0.04). According to the Callanan safe zone, the percentage of outliers was also lower in the 3D guided group (32%, versus 75%, p = 0.001) (Figure 3). The surgeon tends to position the cup with a higher anteversion than the native acetabulum anteversion. Conclusions. The use of a 3D preoperative planning can improve cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty by increasing the accuracy of the anteversion restoration and reducing the percentage of outliers. When using a direct anterior approach in supine position, the surgeon may tend intuitively to implant the cup with a higher anteversion value comparatively to the native acetabulum anteversion because of the postero-caudal overcoverage of the cup that gives a false impression of cup retroversion

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is effective, reproducible, and durable in the treatment of hip joint arthritis. While improvements in polyethylene materials have significantly reduced wear rates and osteolysis, aseptic loosening of implants remains one of the leading causes of revision THA. Additionally, fears of dislocation and instability have driven the increase in the utilization of larger diameter femoral heads in primary THA which can lead to increased wear when coupled with a polyethylene articulation. Finally, the increasing number of younger and active patients undergoing THA raises questions with regards to the ability of modern conventional bearings to provide durability and longevity beyond second and third decades following joint implantation. Ceramic-on-ceramic articulations are ideally suited for today's young and high demand patients undergoing primary THA. It has the lowest in-vitro wear properties of any bearing couple and the wear characteristics further improved by its wettability and lubrication particularly when larger heads are utilised. Additionally, improvements in material properties and prosthesis design have significantly decreased fracture rates and increased the reliability of these implants. Furthermore, reported outcomes and longevity of modern ceramic-on-ceramic THAs in younger patients have all shown excellent survivorship despite patients achieving and maintaining a very high level of activity and function. In short, it is the bearing couple most in tune with current market demands and utilization trends. While registry data and meta-analyses of published literature have failed to show the superiority of ceramic-on-ceramic articulations compared to conventional bearings at 10 years, there is evidence that even highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXPE) is not immune to wear. Selvarajah et al. reported steady, in-vivo wear rates of HXPE exceeding 0.1 mm/year threshold in young THA patients with 36 mm ceramic ball heads. Additionally, small osteolytic lesions have been observed in hips with HXPE bearings at 12–14 years follow up. Finally, analysis of all controlled randomised studies have shown less osteolysis of ceramic-on-ceramic hips compared to polyethylene articulations. The significance of these lesions are unclear but the question remains: Can HXPE as a bearing be able to provide over 30 years of service needed to outlast patients younger than 60 years?. Concerns with cost, squeaking, and fractures do not make ceramic-on-ceramic bearings suitable for all patients undergoing primary THA. However, in young, healthy and active patients, a modern ceramic-on-ceramic articulation is most likely to provide the lowest wear rates, lowest risk of osteolysis, and greatest chance for life-long durability

Introduction. Accurate acetabular position is an important goal during THA. It is also well known that accurate acetabular positioning is very frequently not achieved, even by experienced, high volume surgeons. Problems associated with cup malposition are: dislocation, accelerated poly wear, impingement, ceramic squeaking, metalosis. Murray et al described 3 methods of measurement and assessment of acetabular inclination and anteversion (I&A): anatomic, radiographic and operative. It is the hypothesis of the authors, that the differences and details of these 3 methods are poorly understood by many surgeons and this is contributory to inconsistent cup positioning. Additionally, the radiographic method, which is most commonly used for post op assessment and academic studies, contributes to misunderstanding and error. Modern computer guidance and software assessment of radiographs allows us to easily measure anatomic I&A which should be thought of as “true” I&A. Methods. The mathematical criteria for radiographic measurement of anatomic I&A are defined as well as the mathematical relationships and discrepancies between anatomic and radiographic I&A for any given cup. A. =. A. n. g. l. e.  . o. f.  . a. n. t. e. v. e. r. s. i. o. n.  . o. f.  . c. u. p. I. =. A. n. g. l. e.  . o. f.  . i. n. c. l. i. n. a. t. i. o. n.  . o. f.  . c. u. p. E = Angle of ellipse major diameter to horizontal. E = Radiographic inclination. Sin.  . A. =. H. o. r. i. z. o. n. t. a. l.  . w. i. d. t. h.  . o. f.  . e. l. l. i. p. s. e. L. e. n. g. t. h.  . o. f.  . e. l. l. i. p. s. e.  . m. a. j. o. r.  . d. i. a. m. e. t. e. r. Sin.  . I. =. V. e. r. t. i. c. a. l.  . h. e. i. g. h. t.  . o. f.  . e. l. l. i. p. s. e. L. e. n. g. t. h.  . o. f.  . e. l. l. i. p. s. e.  . m. a. j. o. r.  . d. i. a. m. e. t. e. r. Tan I = Tan E / Cos A. Tan E = (Tan I) x (Cos A). Results. Numerical values for radiographic I&A and anatomic I&A coincide for cups placed at 0 degrees anteversion. However, as cup anteversion increases, there is an exponentially increasing discrepancy between anatomic and radiographic inclination values with I always having a higher value than E. Commonly used radiographic inclination values (E) therefore always underestimate anatomic (true) inclination. Additionally, radiographic anteversion, except for 0 degrees anteversion, always underestimates anatomic (true) anteversion. Wear testing of cups by manufacturers and associated recommendations for cup positioning are based on anatomic measurement of inclination while surgeons now use a different method (radiographic) for measuring position. Axial CT analysis of cup anteversion agrees mathematically with anatomic anteversion and does not mathematically agree with the Murray radiographic criteria. Conclusions. Surgeons can intuitively understand that accurate radiographic measurement of femoral neck-shaft angle can only be done if the proximal femur is correctly rotated in relation to the x-ray beam, specifically the x-ray beam must be perpendicular to the plane determined by the intersection of the center lines of the neck and shaft. Any other femoral rotation will show a false increase in the neck shaft angle. Though less intuitive, true cup I is only represented by the angle seen on x-ray at only one A value, 0 degrees. Anteverting the cup as is desirable for THA stability creates a discrepancy between the apparent cup angle (E) and true inclination. Since the principles of solid geometry are widely adopted and accepted, the above results and conclusions are based on mathematical proof, not experimental findings. Erroneous conclusions such as “the cup position is good but the hip still dislocates” can be associated with a surgeon's lack of understanding of true I&A. Surgeons need to understand the differences between what they believe to be represented by x-rays and anatomic or true I&A as represented by the cup's position in relation to the body's transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes and x, y, and z axes. The authors believe that a surgeon's continued lack of understanding of the mathematics can be compensated for by the technologies of computer guidance and/or software analysis of cup x-rays

Background/Purpose. Total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with ceramic bearings are widely performed in young, active patients and thus, long-term outcome in these population is important. Moreover, clinical implication of noise, in which most studies focused on ‘squeaking’, remains controversial and one of concerns unsolved associated with the use of ceramic bearings. However, there is little literature regarding the long-term outcomes after THAs using these contemporary ceramic bearings in young patients. Therefore, we performed a long-term study with a minimum follow-up of . 1. 5 years after THAs using contemporary ceramic bearings in young patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) less than fifty. Materials and Methods. Among sixty patients (71 hips) with a mean age of 39.1 years, 7 patients (7 hips) died and 4 patients (4 hips) were lost before 15-year follow-up. The remaining 60 hips were included in this study with an average follow-up period of 16.3 years (range, 15 to 18). All patients underwent cementless THA using a prosthesis of identical design and a 28-mm third-generation alumina head by single surgeon. The clinical evaluations included the modified Harris hip score (HHS), history of dislocation and noise around the hip joint: Noise was classified into squeaking, clicking, grinding and popping and evaluated at each follow-up. Snapping was excluded through physical examination or ultrasonography. Radiographic analysis was performed regarding notching on the neck of femoral component, loosening and osteolysis. Ceramic fracture and survivorship free from revision were also evaluated. Results. The mean Harris hip score improved from 55.3 to 95.5 points (range, 83 to 100) at the time of the final follow-up. Seventeen patients (34.7%) reported noise around the hip joint: “squeaking” in one and “clicking” in 16 patients. Notching on the neck of femoral component suggesting impingement between neck and ceramic liner was demonstrated in 9 hips (15%) at average of 6.9 years postoperatively and located at 2 to 3.5 mm distal to edge of ceramic head. Although no chip fracture of ceramic ‘liner’ occurred, notching was associated with “clicking” sound (p<0.01). One patient who reported clicking sound underwent a revision THA because of ceramic ‘head’ fracture. Loosening, osteolysis or dislocation was not observed in any hip and survivorship free from revision at 5 years was 98%. Conclusion. Cementless THAs using 28-mm contemporary alumina ceramic head demonstrated excellent long-term outcome in young, active patients with ONFH. Despite this encouraging result, however, we remain concerned about ‘clicking’ sound, because we did observe it associated with notching on the neck of stem. Acknowledgement. This work was supported by Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (#B0101-14-1081)

Different bearing surfaces, including alumina-on-alumina have been used to avoid osteolysis. We ask if the use of modern ceramics matched with metal-backed sockets improves clinical results avoiding aseptic loosening, osteolysis and late dislocations. We prospectively analysed 315 Cerafit cups in two different generations: First generation implanted between 1999 and 2005 (124 cups) and second generation (191 cups) all implanted with a 5-year minimum follow-up, and associated with a Multicone-HAP stem using alumina-on-alumina bearings. Patients' mean age was 48.7+13.6 years. There were three dislocations within the first postoperative month and one early recurrent dislocation requiring reoperation using a double mobility cup. There were four intraoperative fractures, two in rheumatoid juvenile arthritis cases solved with a cerclage, and one postoperative fracture solved using a femoral long-stem. No fractures were seen in the alumina components in this series. Also, there have been no infections. There were 4 patients reporting non-reproducible squeaking. Survivorship analysis for cup loosening for any cause was 93% for group 1 (11 cups) and 99.2% for group 2 (1 cup in a patient with severe developmental dysplasia). The cumulative probability of not having a revision of one or both components for any cause was 96.9% (CI 95%:9.47–99.1%), All unrevised cases showed good clinical and radiographic results at the end of follow-up. No stem loosening, osteolysis nor stress shielding were found in any case by the end of follow-up. Changes in linear femoral head penetration were not seen in any hip. These data suggest that Cerafit alumina-on-alumina prostheses show excellent results after fiften years. Cup loosening was more frequent in the cups of first generation, but not currently. Continued follow-up will be required to determine if reduction in wear between the alumina-on alumina bearings results in less osteolysis and loosening