Abstract
Introduction
Dislocation due to suboptimal cup positioning is a devastating complication in the early phase after total hip arthroplasty. Malpositioning can also result in other mechanical complications like subluxation, edge loading, increased debris, surface damage or squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips. Preventing at least some of these complications in younger and more active patients is of paramount interest for the individual patient and for the society since optimized component orientation is an important determinant to reduce such risks and to further increase longevity of the implant. This study reports on two new surgical instruments that help the orthopedic surgeon to manually place both components within the optimized combined safe-zone (cSafe-Zone).
Material and Methods
More than 900 minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasties (MIS-THA) have been performed between 2007 and 2015 in our institution using the minimal-invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) on an orthopedic table with foot holder. Cups were implanted applying the “stem-first” surgical technique i.e. the prosthetic stem dictates the orientation of the socket depending on the prosthesis design. A system-specific trial head which indicates the prosthesis-specific relative orientation of cup and stem and a modified cup impactor were used to finally seat the definitive acetabular socket manually during trial stem reduction while fully visually controlling the optimal orientation of the cup during impaction. This surgical technique drives both components into their optimal relative positions according to the combined version and the combined safe-zone concept in total hip arthroplasty.
Results
Both new instruments, femoral trial head as well as the modified cup impactor, provide an easy way to manually control the optimal placement of the acetabular socket during impaction intraoperatively. The combined safe-zone is clearly indicated and the inverse interrelationship of stem and cup anteversion is ideally reflected by this simple mechanical system. In patients operated on with the “stem-first” technique the components were placed in the new cSafe-Zone in 94% of the cases and no squeaking or prosthetic impingement did occur in any of these patients. One early dislocation did occur and was treated by closed reduction.
Conclusion
Stem-first technique using trial head-controlled impaction with a modified cup impactor is ideally suited for the minimal-invasive direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty to control the placement of both prosthetic components. It assists the surgeon in aligning the cup and the stem according to the cSafe-Zone in order to get the intended range of movement (iROM).
