NOISY CERAMIC-ON-CERAMIC BEARINGS AND THEIR CORRELATION WITH PATIENT, IMPLANT AND SURGERY PARAMETERS

Abstract

While squeaking ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty are increasingly reported in the literature, the etiology remains unclear. Cup inclination and anteversion have been correlated with the phenomenon but even amongst well positioned cups bearing noise is observed. Most studies do not distinguish between different types of noise or incidence rate and do only investigate actively complaining patients. This study analysed the incidence of ceramic bearing noise in a single type of hip implant and investigates correlations with patient, implant and surgery parameters.

In a consecutive series of 145 ceramic-on-ceramic primary hips (Stryker ABG-II, 28mm head) in 132 patients (m/f=72/60, avg. age=54yrs) and an average follow-up of 3.0 (1–7) years, noisy bearings were identified by a patient questionnaires stating the type of noise (squeaking, clicking, scratching, combinations), time of initial incidence, incidence rate (permanent, often, sometimes, rare) and type of movement. Patient demographics (age, gender, height, weight, BMI, side of surgery, leg length difference), implant parameters (cup and stem size, neck length) and surgery parameters (cup and stem position, leg length correction) were recorded and compared between the noisy and silent groups (t-test, Fisher Exact test).

Twenty-eight noisy hips (19.3%) were identified with 14 patients reporting squeaking, 16 clicking and 5 scratching including 7 with a combination of noises. Quasi permanent noises were reported for 7 hips (2 often) but in 17 cases the noise appeared only sometimes (2 rare). The average time of first incidence was 1.74 years port-op with 7 hips reporting noise directly after operation and 15 after 2 years or more. Silent and noisy hips were statistically not different regarding age, gender, follow-up time, side of operation, height, weight, BMI, cup and stem size, leg length difference or stem position. Significant differences were identified with the noise group having a steeper cup inclination (49.9° vs 46.9°, p< 0.05) and less frequent shorter (−2.7mm) necks (0 vs 22%, p< 0.01) but more frequent longer (+4mm) necks (50% vs 37%, p< 0.05). Leg length correction was performed less frequent (31 vs 55%, p< 0.01). In the noise group 5 (17%) and in the silent group only 1 (0.9%) cup revisions was performed (p< 0.01).

The incidence of noisy ceramic bearings was higher than usually reported (< 5%) as not only actively complaining subjects but all patients were interviewed. Cup position was confirmed to be a contributing factor but patient weight, height or BMI did not play a role. However, the use of long necks, the absence of short necks and less frequently performed leg length corrections significantly contributed to producing bearing noise. Biomechanical restoration, preoperative planning and soft tissue tension seem to be important factors in bearing noise etiology.