Aims. To establish our early clinical results of a new total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tibial component introduced in 2013 and compare it to other designs in use at our hospital during the same period. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 166 (154 patients) consecutive cemented, fixed bearing, posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs (ATTUNE) at one hospital performed by five surgeons. These were compared with a reference cohort of 511 knees (470 patients) of other designs (seven manufacturers) performed at the same hospital by the same surgeons. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or follow-up times between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was revision performed or pending. Results. In total, 19 (11.5%) ATTUNE study TKAs have been revised at a mean 30.3 months (SD 15), and loosening of the tibial component was seen in 17 of these (90%). Revision is pending in 12 (7%) knees. There was no difference between the 31 knees revised or with revision pending and the remaining 135 study knees in terms of patient characteristics, type of bone cement (p = 0.988), or individual surgeon (p = 0.550). In the reference cohort, there were significantly fewer knees revised (n = 13, 2.6%) and with revision pending (n = 8, 1.5%) (both p < 0.001), and only two had loosening of the tibial component as the reason for revision. Conclusion. This new TKA design had an unexpectedly high early rate of revision compared with our reference cohort of TKAs. Debonding of the tibial component was the most common reason for failure. Additional longer-term follow-up studies of this specific component and techniques for implantation are warranted. The version of the ATTUNE tibial component implanted in this study has undergone modifications by the manufacturer. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):137–144

Summary Statement. Wear of total knee replacement (TKR) is a clinical concern. This study demonstrated low-conformity moderately cross-linked-polyethylene fixed bearing TKRs showed lower volumetric wear than conventional-polyethylene curved fixed bearing TKRs highlighting potential improvement in TKR performance through design and material selection. Introduction. Wear of total knee replacement (TKR) continues to be a significant factor in the clinical performance of the implants. Historically, failure due to delamination and fatigue directed implant design towards more conforming implants to reduce contact stress. However, the new generations of more oxidatively-stable polyethylene have improved the long-term mechanical properties of the material, and therefore allowed more flexibility in the bearing design. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of insert conformity and material on the wear performance of a fixed bearing total knee replacement through experimental simulation. Methods. The wear of TKR bearings were investigated using a physiological six station Prosim knee wear simulator (Simulator Solutions, UK). Six samples of each test configuration (Sigma CR fixed bearing knees (DePuy Synthes, UK) were studied, and compared with previously reported data, tested under identical conditions (1, 2). The central axis of the implant was offset from the aligned axes of applied load and tibial rotation to replicate a right knee. High kinematics, under anterior-posterior displacement control was used for this study (3). The lubricant was 25% (v/v) calf serum supplemented with 0.03% (v/v) sodium azide solution in deionised water, as an antibacterial agent, and was changed approximately every 0.33Mc. Wear was assessed gravimetrically and moisture uptake accounted for using unloaded soak controls. Results. The wear rates for the moderately cross-linked inserts (XLK) were significantly lower than the conventional polyethylene (GVF) for all geometries (ANOVA, p<0.05). There was a significant reduction in wear rate as the insert geometry became less conforming for both materials (ANOVA, p<0.05). The wear scars areas were comparable in size and shape between materials, within a geometry group. The size of the wear scar changed with conformity, with the curved inserts showing the largest scars in both anterior-posterior and medial-lateral dimensions, and the flat inserts showing the smallest wear scars. Discussion/Conclusion. The introduction of a moderately cross-linked polyethylene insert was shown to significantly reduce the wear of a fixed bearing total knee replacement compared with a conventional material. There was a trend for reducing wear rate with reducing conformity for both materials, suggesting that reduced conformity results in higher contact pressures and reduced contact area, leading to a reduced surface for wear to occur. Both material and conformity were shown to have a significant impact on the wear of a fixed bearing TKR, and therefore provide opportunity for enhancing wear performance through material and design selection

Purpose of the study. Assessing medium term outcome of medial Uni compartmental replacement and whether there is a difference in outcome between mobile and fixed bearing variants of the same prosthesis. Methods. Knee outcome was assessed in 150 patients (81 male, 69 females, mean age 67.0±10.4yrs) undergoing medial UKR knee (Uniglide, Corin Medical, UK) using either fixed or mobile bearing prosthesis between 2002-2007. All operations were performed by members of the Bristol knee group. All patients were scored using the American Knee Score (AKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and WOMAC pre-operatively and at 2-year follow up. The mobile group (n=93) comprised 43 males and 50 females, aged 62.8±8.9yrs. The fixed bearing group (n=57) comprised 38 males and 19 females, aged 74±8.8yrs. Results. Pre-operative measures of AKS, OKS, and WOMAC did not significantly differ between mobile and fixed bearing groups (p>0.05) with scores in the range of 111-113 out of 175, 19.6 out of 48, and 36.7-37.5 out 60, in the AKS, OKS, and WOMAC respectively. Two-year follow up scores for AKS, OKS, and WOMAC demonstrated a significant (p<0.0001) improvement in function with scores ranging from 167-171, 33.1-34.5, and 23.3-24.8 points respectively. No significant difference was observed at 2-year follow up between mobile or fixed bearing groups (p>0.05). Discussion. Two-year follow up outcome scores demonstrated a significant improvement in patient function for both fixed and mobile bearing prostheses compared with pre-operative scores, with no differences in outcome observed between mobile or fixed bearing devices

Aim: This study investigated the difference in proximal tibial cortical strain distribution using a fixed or mobile bearing design for TKA. Methods: Eight fresh frozen human cadaver tibias were used. The strain magnitude and distribution on the anterior cortex of the proximal tibia during axial and rotational loading of the knee were measured with a quantitative full-field strain measurement technique (Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry). First, strain distributions of the intact knee were acquired. Subsequently, strain distributions after implementation of conventional and mobile bearing PCL retaining total knee implants (Scorpio®) were measured. Results: Under each loading condition, the minimum principal strain was greater in magnitude as compared to the maximum principal strain. Under 1′500 N axial loading, the resulting minimum principal strain magnitude and orientation was nearly identical between the mobile bearing configuration (500 ± 287 με), and the fixed bearing configuration (500 ± 286 μ ε). In response to 10° internal rotation, this strain increased to 782 ± 371 μ ε and 1000 ± 389 μ ε for the mobile and fixed tibial component, respectively. In response to 10° external rotation, minimal principal strain decreased to 421 ± 233 μ ε for the mobile bearing, but increased to 632 ± 293 μ ε for the fixed bearing. These differences between mobile and fixed bearing scenarios were statistically highly significant. Conclusion: For this in-vitro study under exact controlled loading conditions the mobile bearing design induced less strain in the proximal tibia as the fixed bearing tibial component. The difference in strain levels may be of importance to understand bone remodeling and osseointegration

Introduction Movement between the polyethylene insert and the metal tibial tray in modular fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to a poor locking mechanism is said to occur. The resulting “backside wear” is proposed as one cause of osteolysis and subsequent loosening. In vitro analysis has revealed movements between the poly and the tibial tray both in non-implanted designs as well as in implants extracted during revisions and at autopsy. Scratch marks on the surfaces at the tray-poly interface have been found indicating rotatory movements between the components. The purpose of this study was to determine in vivo the existence and magnitude of movements between the poly and the tibial tray in modular metal-backed TKA. Methods Ten patients (median age 71) operated with the NextGen modular fixed bearing TKA due to gonarthrosis were analyzed. This TKA has lipped edges around the entire periphery of the implant to capture and secure the poly insert. The metal tray of the tibial component was equipped with five tantalum markers, and the polyethylene insert with six markers. Radiostereometric (RSA) investigation was performed within one week post-op, and at 12 months. Change in position of the poly insert in relation to the metal tray between the post-op and the 12 months investigations was analyzed as rotations about, and translations along the cardinal axis of the knee. The Insert motion index according to Engh et al (2001) was calculated. Results Between the surgery and 12 months post-operatively there was a median external rotation of the poly in relation to the metal tray of 0.4 (range: 0.09 to 0.73). Median insert motion index was 0.36 mm (range 0.2 mm to 0.6 mm). Subsidence and lift-off of the polyethylene were very small and below the detection limit of RSA (< 0.08 mm). Conclusions This study shows for the first time that movements do occur in vivo between the polyethylene insert and the metal tray in modular fixed bearing TKA, even in designs with a full peripheral capture mechanism. The movements occur in the plane of the metal tray (i.e. external rotation, medial-lateral and anteroposterior translation), but no movements are detected in directions out of this plane (proximal-distal translation). The magnitudes of these translations are equivalent to those found in in vitro studies of explanted components. This study thus questions the efficacy of the locking mechanism in modular fixed bearing TKA. In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source

This study investigated the difference in proximal tibial cortical strain distribution using a fixed or mobile bearing design for TKA. Eight fresh frozen human cadaver tibias were used. The strain magnitude and distribution on the anterior cortex of the proximal tibia during axial and rotational loading of the knee were measured with a quantitative full-field strain measurement technique (Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry). First, strain distributions of the intact knee were acquired. Subsequently, strain distributions after implantation of conventional and mobile bearing PCL retaining total knee implants (Scorpio®) were measured. Under each loading condition, the minimum principal strain was greater in magnitude as compared to the maximum principal strain. Under 1,500 N axial loading, the resulting minimum principal strain magnitude and orientation was nearly identical between the mobile bearing configuration(500 ± 287m;e;), and the fixed bearing configuration (500 ± 286m;e;). In response to 10° internal rotation, this strain increased to 782 ± 371m;e; and 1000± 389m;e; for the mobile and fixed tibial component, respectively. In 10° external rotation, minimal principal strain decreased to 421 ± 233m;e; for the mobile bearing, but increased to 632 ± 293m;e; for the fixed bearing. These differences between mobile and fixed bearing scenarios were highly statistically significant. For this in-vitro study under exact controlled loading conditions the mobile bearing design induced less strain in the proximal tibia than the fixed bearing tibial component. The difference in strain levels may be of importance for bone remodeling and osseointegration

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of the PFC flex mobile bearing design with those of the LPS flex fixed bearing design in high-flex total knee arthroplasty. Between January 2005 and November 2006, forty-six patients who received PFC flex mobile bearing prosthesis in one knee and LPS flex fixed bearing prosthesis in the contralateral knee followed up for a minimum 2 years were evaluated. Clinical results were assessed using the ROM, HSS score, the Knee rating systems of the knee society, WOMAC score and SF-36. Radiological results were evaluated tibio-femoral angle and loosening or osteolysis of components. We subdivided preoperative less 90 degree and more 90 degree in each group. Mean ROM range of last follow up was increased to 131.1 degree in LPS group and 130.1 degree in PFC group. But there was no significant difference between the two groups. HSS score, knee pain and function score, WOMAC score, SF-36 score didn’t differ significantly between two groups. But descending stairs, rising from sitting, bending to the floor more improved significantly in LPS group. T-F angle was changed from preoperative 8.2 degree varus to a postoperative 4.8 degree valgus. No knee had aseptic loosening or osteolysis. Postoperative ROM was increase significantly in both groups. We found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to clinical and radiological parameters excepts descending stairs, rising from sitting, bending to the floor in WOMAC score. There was no aseptic loosening or osteolysis but needed long term observation about these concerns

Introduction and Aims: Fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee designs are currently used in clinical practice with little evidence based research available to determine superiority of one system. The purpose of this study was to compare the results between a cruciate retaining mobile bearing and two cruciate retaining fixed bearing total knee prostheses. Method: We performed a prospective, randomised, blinded clinical trial to compare a mobile bearing to two standard fixed-bearing implants. We evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of the SAL. ®. (Sulzer) mobile bearing versus the AMK. ®. (Depuy) and Genesis II. ®. (Smith & Nephew) fixed bearing, total knee joint replacements. Ninety patients were randomised to receive one of the three prostheses. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively, at three, 12 months and annually thereafter. Patient demographics, radiographs, and multiple outcome measures (WOMAC, SF-12 and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System) were evaluated. A single observer was used to measure range of motion scores. Results and Discussion: No patients were lost to follow-up. One patient was withdrawn due to dementia before three months, one patient died prior to the two-year follow-up, and one patient was revised for infection at six months, leaving 87 patients at an average follow-up of 3.37 years (range 2.91–4.44 years). There were no significant differences in any outcome measures or radiographic findings. There were no differences in KSCRS at two years (SAL – 167, AMK – 158, GenesisII – 166 ). There were no differences in WOMAC scores or SF-12 survey scores. There were no differences in knee flexion at two years (SAL – 117. °. , AMK – 115. °. , GenesisII – 118. °. ). Therefore, no differences in multiple outcome measures were seen between a cruciate retaining mobile bearing and two cruciate retaining fixed bearing total knee prostheses. Conclusion: In this prospective randomised clinical trial no differences could be seen between a mobile bearing and two fixed bearing designs at a minimum of two years follow-up. Long-term evaluation will be required to comment on differences in polyethylene wear and implant longevity

Abstract. Introduction. Medial fix bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) designs are consider safe and effective implants with many registries data and big cohort series showing excellent survivorship and clinical outcome comparable to that reported for the most expensive and surgically challenging medial UKR mobile bearing designs. However, whether all polyethylene tibial components (all-poly) provided comparable results to metal-backed modular components during medial fix bearing UKR remains unclear. There have been previous suggestions that all-poly tibia UKR implants might show unacceptable higher rates of early failure due to tibial component early loosening especially in high body max index (BMI) patients. This study aims to find out the short and long-term survival rate of all-poly tibia UKR and its relationship with implant thickness and patient demographics including sex, age, ASA and BMI. Material and Methods. we present the results of a series of 388 medial fixed bearing all-polly tibia UKR done in our institution by a single surgeon between 2007–2019. Results. We found out excellent implant survival with this all-poly tibia UKR design with 5 years survival rate: 96.42%, 7 years survival rate: 95.33%, and 10 years survival rate: 91.87%. Only 1.28% had early revision within 2 years. Conclusion. Fixed bearing medial all-poly tibia UKR shows excellent survivor rate at 2, 5, 7 and 10 years follow up and the survival rate is not related with sex, age, BMI, ASA grade or implant thickness. Contrary to the popular belief, we found out that only 1.71% of all implants was revised due to implant loosening

Purpose of Study: Fixed bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has become popular since several series have now shown good 10 year survivorship and excellent function. However little is known about survival during the second decade. Method: From the Bristol database of over 4000 knee replacements 203 St. Georg Sled UKR’s which had already survived 10 years were identified. The mean age at surgery was 67 years (48–85), with 64% being female. This cohort has been further reviewed at an average of 14.8 years (10–30) from surgery to determine survivorship and function. Results: Survivorship during the second decade was 87.5%. 58 patients (69 knees) had died with implant in situ and only 2 after revision. A further 15 UKR’s have been revised at an average of 13 years post op; 7 for progression of disease in the opposite compartment, 4 for tibial loosening, 3 for polyethylene wear, 2 for femoral component fracture and 2 for infection. 99 knees were followed for 15 years, 21 knees for 20 years and four for 25 or more years. The average Bristol knee score of the surviving knees fell from 86 to 79 during the second decade, largely as a result of aging. A previous study of the St Georg. Fixed bearing UKR showed an 89% 10 year survivorship and this is now extended to 82% at 15 years and 76.5% at 20 years. Conclusion: Satisfactory survival of fixed bearing UKR can be achieved in the second decade suggesting that the indications for mobile bearings require careful definition since there is a higher incidence of complications in many people’s hands

BACKGROUND:. Implant wear continues to be a limitation of total knee replacement (TKR). Wear simulator studies are a valuable screening tool in new implant development. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of micro-CT to prospectively measure wear in TKR implants during a wear simulator trial. METHODS:. Three identical cruciate-retaining, fixed bearing cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) on conventional EtO-sterilized polyethylene TKA implants underwent wear simulator testing up to 3.2 million cycles using gait inputs; loaded-soaks were used to correct for fluid absorption. The implants were weighed and scanned with micro-CT (at 50 micron resolution) before and after testing. The gravimetric mass was converted to volume based on the density of polyethylene. Volume change due to wear was calculated from both the gravimetric and micro-CT methods. The pre- and post-wear test micro-CT geometries were co-registered and the deviations between the two were measured. RESULTS:. The mean wear volume was 90.8 ± 12.2 mm. 3. measured gravimetrically and 66.4 ± 13.3 mm. 3. measured by micro-CT (p = 0.002). While underestimating wear volume compared to gravimetric analysis, micro-CT demonstrated strong correlation (r. 2. = 0.99, slope difference from zero p < 0.0001). No subsurface changes such as cracks were noted in the micro-CT images. Maximum penetration (from wear and creep) was 0.77 ± 0.20 mm medially and 0.41 ± 0.06 mm laterally. Deformation up to 0.180 mm was noted on each side of the inserts after wear testing. Discussion:. Micro-CT underestimation of wear volume compared to gravimetric analysis is consistent with previous reports of micro-CT use. The discrepancy could be caused by a scaling error in the micro-CT volume reconstruction, or an error in the fluid uptake correction for gravimetric analysis. Micro-CT had a strong correlation with gravimetric analysis, and also enables analysis of the implant subsurface, and measurements of penetration and surface deformation. The wear volume was consistent with other fixed bearing TKR couples made from CoCrMo and conventional non-irradiated polyethylene

The outcome and survivorship of osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis are closely correlated to the changes in the weight bearing axis. Questions remain over the optimal correction when undertaking medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Prospective data was collected on 50 patients (30F:20M) undergoing fixed bearing medial UKR which included pre-operative and 12 month Oxford Knee Scores and pre and post-operative weight-bearing long-leg radiographs. The weight bearing axis was measured from the centre of the femoral head to the mid-point of the talus. The point at which this axis crossed the tibial plateau was expressed as a percentage of the width of that plateau - 0 (medial cortex) to 100% (lateral cortex). Regression method and correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between the response and variables. A significant correlation was seen between the 12 month score and the change in axis, which was maintained when the pre-operative score was adjusted for (p = 0.043 and 0.046 respectively). Larger changes in scores were seen with larger changes in axis (p = 0.046) when the pre-operative axis was adjusted for. Higher BMIs reported worse scores at 12 months (p = 0.022) and a smaller overall change in score one year post-operatively (p = 0.037). This significance was improved when the pre-operative scores were adjusted (p = 0.017 and 0.017 respectively). Proximity of correction of axis to the assumed contralateral normal was weakly correlated (p = 0.049) to the 12 month score, especially when BMI was corrected for. These results suggest that the weight bearing axis and BMI do play a significant role in early patient outcomes following fixed bearing unicompartmental knee replacement

Background: The osteolysis in revision total knee arthroplasty was observed. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence and characteristics of osteolysis recognized in revision total knee arthroplasties between the failed mobile bearing and fixed bearing knees. Methods: Eighty revision total knee arthroplasties were done between 1995 and 1998. The primary prosthesis that failed included thirty-four mobile bearing (Low Contact Stress) knees and forty-six fixed bearing knees of vary prostheses. At the time of revision surgery, all the interfaces between bone and prosthesis or cement were routinely checked and recorded for evidence of osteolytic resorption of bone. Preoperative radiographs were assessed independently by two authors for evidence of focal or severe periprosthetic osteolysis. The presence of the lesion was recorded. The demographic data included age and body weight was reviewed. The interval between the primary and revision surgery was recorded. The revision technique was reviewed. A statistical technique of chi-square test was applied in this study. Results: Osteolysis was recognized in sixteen of thirty-four mobile bearing knees (47 per cent) with thirteen knees involved distal femur and in six of forty- six fixed bearing knees (13 per cent) with four knees involved distal femur. The incidence of osteolysis was statistically significant difference between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing knees (p< 0.05). An overall 28 per cent (twenty-two knees) incidence of osteolysis was identified intraoperatively. The overall incidence of osteolysis in distal femur was 21 per cent (seventeen knees). The average time interval from the primary surgery to revision was 108 months. All the knees were affected by osteoarthritis. The most common site of osteolytic bone resorption was the posterior femoral condyle. Conclusions: Comparing to the fixed bearing knees, the mobile bearing (Low Contact Stress) knees were at increased risk for osteolysis in our series. Osteolysis occurred predominantly on the femoral side, especially adjacent to the prostheses in posterior condyle. Radiographic evaluation of osteolysis in distal femur is unreliable

Introduction. Wear debris induced osteolysis and loosening continue to be causes of clinical failure in total knee replacement (TKR). Laboratory simulation aims to predict the wear of TKR bearings under specific loading and motion conditions. However, the conditions applied may have significant influence on the study outcomes (1). The aim of this study was to examine the influence of femoral setup and kinematic inputs on the wear of a conventional polyethylene fixed bearing TKR through experimental and computational models. Methods. Six right Sigma CR fixed bearing TKRs (DePuy Synthes, Leeds, UK) with curved polyethylene inserts (GVF, GUR1020 UHMWPE) were tested in Prosim knee simulator (Simulator Solutions, UK). The femoral bearing was set up with the centre of rotation (CoR) on either on the distal radius of the implant (Distal CoR), as indicated by the device design, or according to the ISO specification (ISO CoR; ISO14243-3). The tests were conducted under ‘High Kinematics’ (2). It was necessary to reverse the direction of the anterior-posterior displacement for the tests conducted with the ISO centre of rotation to maintain the contact region within the insert surface (Reverse High Kinematics). Tests were conducted for three million cycles, lubricated with 25% bovine serum, with wear assessed gravimetrically. The computational wear model for the TKR was based on the contact area and an independent experimentally determined non-dimensional wear coefficient, previously validated against the experimental data (3). Results. Good agreement was found between our computational and experimental models (Figure 1). The effect of femoral setup (and adjusted input kinematics) was shown to be significant (ANOVA, p < 0.05), with lower wear under the ISO CoR conditions. The reduction in wear was approximately 49% compared with the Distal CoR. A comparison of the final wear scar area showed the scars to be smaller and located more anteriorly under the ISO CoR/Reverse High Kinematic conditions, compared with the distal CoR study (Figure 2). Discussion. The femoral setup was shown to have a significant impact on the computational and experimental wear rates, with the ISO CoR condition having approximately half the wear of the Distal CoR. It appears that through changing the centre of rotation (and subsequently the anterior-posterior direction) the relative motion and contact mechanics at the articulating surface are altered (1). This study highlights the significant influence test setup conditions may have on the wear of a. It is proposed that there is a need to examine TKR bearings under a broad range of conditions, rather than one study condition to fully assess wear performance

We report the short term follow up of nineteen consecutive PFC sigma unicompartmental knee replacements carried out in our institution with minimum one year follow up. The PFC Sigma medial unicompartmental knee replacement is a fixed bearing, cemented unicompartmenal knee replacement. There are currently no published reports of follow up for the PFC Sigma medial unicompartmental knee replacement. Nineteen patients (nineteen knees) underwent PFC sigma medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The pre-operative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in eighteen patients and osteonecrosis in one patient. There were ten males and nine females with a mean age of sixty four years. All patients had clinical and radiological review at one year. All operations were carried out by the two senior authors (BPR and BL). The mean length of admission was 2.7 days (Range 2–5). There have been no infective or thromboembolic complications to date. The mean oxford scores improved from 41 (Range 26–52) pre-operatively to 18 (15–27) at one year follow-up. The mean range of motion improved from 115 degrees of flexion preoperatively to 125 degrees. All radiographs were satisfactory at one year follow up with no evidence of loosening. We report the promising early results of a new medial unicompartmental knee replacement with at least one year follow up. No early complications or infections were identified in our cohort of patients

Purpose. Prospective randomized intervention trial to determine whether patients undergoing rotating platform total knee arthroplasty have better clinical outcomes at two years when compared to patients receiving fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty as measured by the WOMAC, SF-36 and Knee Society (KSS) scores. Method. 67 consecutive patients (33 males and 34 females; average age 66 years) were randomized into either receiving a DePuy Sigma rotating platform (RP) total knee arthroplasty (29 patients) or a DePuy Sigma fixed bearing (FB) total knee arthroplasty (38 patients). Inclusion criteria included patients between the ages of 45–75 undergoing single-sided total knee arthoplasty for clinically significant osteoarthritic degeneration. Pain, disability and well-being were assessed using the WOMAC, KSS, and SF-36 preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively. In addition, intraoperative measures were collected. Pre-operative radiographs were analyzed using the Kellgren and Lawrence Score, modified Scotts Scoring and mechanical axis. Post-operative radiographs were collected at 1 and 2 years and analyzed to identify evidence of prosthetic loosening, implant positioning and limb alignment. Results. The two groups were well-matched following randomization (age, BMI, side) and had no significant differences in intraoperative measures (operative time, estimated blood loss). There were no differences in the groups with respect to their preoperative radiographs. The average female patient was younger compared to their male cohorts (mean female = 63; mean male 68 p=0.005). The post-operative radiographs did not reveal any differences between RP and FB groups when comparing sagittal alignment of femoral and tibial components, patellar tilt and patellar location. With respect to clinical outcomes, both groups reported statistically significant improvements in KSS, WOMAC and SF-36 scores. There were no differences in their pre- and post-operative SF-36 mental component scores. The 1 year WOMAC function score was significantly higher (worse outcome) in the FB group (mean = 18) compared to the RP group (mean 7.8) (p < 0.01). Two year KSS scores were significantly higher (better outcome) in the FB group (mean = 95.7) compared to the RP group (mean = 85.9) (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Both rotating platform and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty result in clinical improvement over pre-operative function, but has no effect on the mental component of the SF-36. The current study suggests that there is not a clear benefit in selecting either a rotating platform or a fixed bearing total knee system; rather both implants result in improved function. Interestingly, when comparing the results of the WOMAC and KSS, although both measure functional outcomes, when applied to the same population demonstrate differing sensitivity

Introduction: In vivo fluoroscopic studies have shown considerable differences in kinematics between different designs of knee prostheses and compared to the natural knee. Most noticeably, lift off of the femoral condyles from the tibial insert has been observed in many patients (. Dennis et al, 2003. ). The aim of this study was to simulate lateral femoral condylar lift off in vitro and to compare the wear of fixed bearing knee prostheses with and without lift off. Materials and Methods: 12 PFC Sigma cruciate retaining fixed bearing knees (DePuy, Leeds, UK) were tested. The 10 mm thick inserts were manufactured from GUR1020 UHMWPE and gamma irradiated in a vacuum. The inserts snap fitted into titanium alloy tibial trays, and articulated against Co-Cr-Mo alloy femoral components. The testing was carried out on six station simulators (Prosim, Manchester, UK). Femoral axis loading (maximum 2.6 kN) and the flex-ion-extension profile (0–58°) were adopted from ISO 14243 (1999). The internal/external rotation was ± 5° and anterior/ posterior displacement 0–5 mm. Six of the knees were tested under these standard conditions for 4 million cycles. A further six knees were tested under these conditions with the addition of lateral femoral condylar lift off, for 5 million cycles. The lift off was achieved by introducing an adduction moment to the tibial carriage, producing a separation of approximately 1 mm during the swing phase of the simulator cycle. The simulator was run at 1 Hz and the lubricant used was 25% newborn calf serum. Wear was determined gravimetrically, using unloaded soak controls to adjust for moisture uptake. Statistical analysis was performed using Students t-test (p < 0.05). Results: Under the standard kinematic conditions the mean wear rate with 95% confidence limits was 8.8 ± 4.8 mm3/million cycles. When femoral condylar lift off was simulated the mean wear rate increased to 16.2 ± 2.9 mm3/million cycles, which was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.01). The wear patterns on the femoral articulating surface of all the inserts showed more burnishing wear on the medial condyle than the lateral. However, in the simulation of lift off the medial condyle was even more aggressively worn with evidence of adhesion and surface defects. Discussion: The presence of lateral femoral condylar lift off resulted in a higher wear rate on the medial compartment of the PFC Sigma fixed bearing knee. This could be due to elevated contact stresses as the lateral lift off produced uneven loading of the bearing. Further, additional medial/lateral sliding of the medial condyle whilst it remained in contact may have accelerated the wear by cross shearing of the polyethylene in the medial/lateral direction. This direction is weakened when the polyethylene is preferentially molecularly orientated by sliding in the flexion-extension axis. The implications of condylar lift off include premature wear of the polyethylene and possible component loosening

Purpose of Study: Fixed bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has become popular since several series have shown good 10 year survivorship and excellent function. However little is known about survival during the second decade. Method: From the Bristol database of over 4000 knee replacements 203 St. George Sled UKR’s which had already survived 10 years were identified. The mean age at surgery was 67 years (48–85), with 64% being female. This cohort has been further reviewed at an average of 14.8 years (10–30) from surgery to determine survivor-ship and function. Results: Survivorship during the second decade was 87.5%. 58 patients (69 knees) had deceased with implant in situ, only 2 after revision. A further 15 UKR’s have been revised at an average of 13 years post op; 7 for progression of disease, 4 for tibial loosening, 3 for polyethylene wear, 2 for femoral component fracture and 2 for infection. 99 knees were followed for 15 years and 21 knees for 20 years. The average Bristol knee score of the surviving knees fell from 86 to 79 during the second decade. A previous study showed an 89% 10 year survivor-ship and this is now extended to 82% at 15 years and 76.5% at 20 years. Conclusion: Satisfactory survival of fixed bearing UKR can be achieved in the second decade suggesting that the indications for mobile bearings require careful definition since there is a higher incidence of complications in many people’s hands

Introduction and Aims A randomised controlled trial (RCT) and a multi-centre unilateral cohort study were performed as part of the stepwise introduction of a new mobile bearing knee. The aim was to ensure that outcome for the new device was at least as good as that for an established fixed bearing device. This paper presents three year follow up of the published one year results. Instability and prevalence of “clicking” from the joint were examined in detail. Method 1. A multi-centre RCT of patients undergoing bilateral knee replacement compared functional outcome between two different prostheses, the new mobile bearing device (TMK) and an established fixed bearing device (AGC). 2. A separate multi-centre cohort of 166 patients who had undergone a unilateral mobile bearing procedure at least six months previously was used to assess complication rate and corroborate any findings from the bilateral trial. Outcome measures included Oxford Knee Scores, American Knee Society ratings and complication rate. Results The bilateral trial revealed no significant differences in outcome between the two devices. Revision rate for all (199) mobile bearing knees was less than 2%. The mean Oxford Knee Score for outcome for all mobile bearing knees was 37.1 ± 10.1. About 7% of patients reported instability. Clicking was more common in the TMK (48%) than in the AGC (30%) and was reported as a problem in 16% of TMK’s in the cohort study. However, clicking was unrelated to outcome score in both studies. Conclusion At three years, the mobile bearing device was as good as the fixed bearing device. There was a relatively high prevalence of “clicking” in the TMK but the cause remains unclear. Furthermore, the symptom was not associated with poor functional outcome. The bilateral RCT and cohort study allows assessment of function and potential problems. It provides rigourous scientific justification for the introduction and early assessment of new implants

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established procedure associated with excellent clinical results. We have previously reported that intraoperative knee kinematics correlate with the clinical outcome in mobile bearing TKA. In addition, the intraoperative knee kinematics pattern does not correlate with the degree of preoperative knee deformity in mobile bearing TKA. However, the relationship among preoperative knee deformity, intraoperative kinematics and clinical outcome in fixed bearing TKA has been unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare the relationship among preoperative knee deformity, knee kinematics after fixed bearing TKA and the clinical outcome including the subjective outcomes evaluated by the new knee society score (KSS). Materials and Methods. A cross-sectional survey of thirty-five consecutive medial osteoarthritis patients who had a primary TKA using a CT-based navigation system was conducted. All knees had a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 4 in the medial compartment and underwent a primary posterior stabilized TKA (Genesis II, Smith&Nephew) between May 2010 and October 2012. In all cases, a computed tomography-guided navigation system (Brain LAB, Heimstetten, Germany) was used. All surgery was performed by the subvastus approach and modified gap technique. Intraoperative knee kinematics was measured using the navigation system after implantation and closure of the retinaculum and soft tissue except for the skin. Subjects were divided into two groups based on intraoperative kinematic patterns: a medial pivot group (M group, n=19)(Figure 1) and a non-medial pivot group (N group, n=16)(Figure 2). Subjective outcomes with the new KSS and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis to compare the two groups was made using unpaired a Student t test. Result. Regarding the postoperative clinical result (knee flexion angle, knee extension angle, mechanical FTA,% mechanical axis), there were no significant differences between the two groups. Although there were also no significant differences in KSS evaluation between the two groups, there was a tendency for M group to be superior to N group in current knee symptom (M group: 17.3±5.6, N group: 12.9±8.2, p = 0.07) and functional activities (M group: 55.1±21.5, N group: 42.7±22.6, p = 0.10). Regarding preoperative examination, varus knee deformity (mechanical FTA and% mechanical axis) in N group was significantly more severe than that of M group (p=0.04, p=0.04, respectively). Discussion. Over half of patients (54%) could achieve medial pivot kinematics in fixed bearing TKA with the possibility to improve a subjective clinical result. Although we previously could not detect any relationship between preoperative varus knee deformity and intraoperative kinematics in mobile bearing TKA, the preoperative varus knee deformity in the non-medial pivot group was significantly severer than that of the medial pivot group in fixed type TKA. Our results indicate that if a TKA is done to a severe varus knee deformity the postoperative knee kinematics tend to result in a non-medial pivot pattern. In conclusion, because it tends to result in a non-medial pivot pattern, extra care needs to be taken to avoid postoperative abnormal knee kinematics in the performance of a fixed type TKA to a severe varus knee deformity

Introduction: Mobile bearing TKRs may allow some axial rotation and also compensate for a slight tibiofemoral rotational mismatch. This is thought to provide better kinematics and a more natural patellar movement. This theoretical advantage has not been verified in clinical studies for the tibiofemoral kinematics. However, little is known about the patellofemoral kinematics of mobile bearing TKRs. The aim was to compare patellar kinematics among the anatomic knee, fixed bearing TKR and mobile bearing TKR. Methods: Optical computer navigation marker arrays (Brainlab) were attached to the femur, tibia and patella of 9 whole lower extremities (5 fresh cadavers). The trial components of a fixed bearing posterior stabilised TKR (FB) (Sigma PFC, Depuy) were implanted using a tibia first technique. Then the tibia component was changed to a posterior stabilised mobile bearing tibia component (MB) (Sigma RP Stabilised). The patellae were not resurfaced. The knees were moved through a cycle of flexion and extension on a CPM machine. Medial/lateral shift and tilt was measured relative to the patella position in the natural knee at full extension always with soft tissue closure. The path of the trochlea and patellar groove of the femoral component was registered. Values are expressed as mean+/−one standard deviation. Statistical analysis: two tailed paired Student’s T-test. Results: M/L shift: There was a tendency for the patella to track 2mm more laterally throughout the flexion range with a FB or MB TKR compared to the natural knee, but this did not reach significance. Tilt: The patella in the natural knee tilted progressively laterally from extension to flexion, plateauing at 50° of flexion (20°: 1.9+/−2.7°, 40°: 5.6+/−5.4°, 60°: 6.2+/−6.4°, 80°:6.5+/−7.3°, 90°: 6.4+/−7.7°). With a FB or MB TKR the patellae also tilted laterally up to 50 degree of flexion, but then started to tilt back medially, reaching the neutral position again at 90°. The patellae of the FB and MB TKRs were significantly more medially tilted at 50° to 90° of flexion compared to the natural knee. But there was no difference between the FB and MB TKRs. (Fixed bearing: 20°: 2.5+/−7.2° p=0.30, 40°: 3.7°+/−6.5° p=0.15, 60°: 3.1+/−5.8° p=0.02, 80°:1.2+/−6.5° p=0.001, 90°: 0.3+/−7.2° p=0.001, Mobile bearing: 20°: 0.3+/−5.5° p=0.27, 40°: 3.6+/−5.2° p=0.08, 60°: 2.1°+/−5.8 p=0.01, 80°: 0.2+/−6.8 p=0.003, 90°: −0.6+/−7.3 p=0.002; vs. natural). Trochlea position: The centre of the patellar groove of the femur component was more lateral than the trochlea by 2–5mm, it also extended 10mm further proximally. Conclusion: There are kinematic differences in patellar tracking between the natural and a FB/MB TKR. This may be due to a slightly different position of the patellar groove. The patellar kinematics of the MB TKR is not more natural compared to the FB TKR

The Profix knee replacement arthroplasty manufactured by Smith and Nephew has been in use for the past five years however there are few published outcome data for this prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to provide clinical outcome data for a cohort of patients with a Profix TKR at a minimum 3 years follow up. There were 65 joint replacements in 58 patients all performed by or under the direct supervision of one of two senior consultant Orthopaedic surgeons. There were 34 right and 31 left knees replaced in 31 male and 27 female patients. Mean age of the patients was 69 years (51–84 years) and mean body mass 89Kg (45–140Kg). The femoral component was uncemented in 49 knees and cemented in 16 knees. The tibial component was cemented in all 65 cases. There were 53 mobile bearing polyethylene inserts and 12 fixed bearing knees. The patella was resurfaced primarily in 32 cases. Using the Oxford Knee score, the mean knee score was 20.7 (Range 12–42) where a perfect score is 12 and the worst possible score 60. Mean clinical range of movement was 111 degrees (Range 90–130 degrees). Of the 65 joints, 13 have required or are awaiting some form of re-operation. These included 3 for patellae that were not resurfaced at the index arthroplasty, 6 for secondary insertion or revision of mobile bearing locking-screws and one femoral revision for failure of on-growth of an uncemented femoral component. The finding of loosening of the mobile bearing locking screw in three well functioning knees highlights the importance of Xray follow-up of patients even if their knee scores are entirely satisfactory. Overall, the clinical results of this prosthesis are satisfactory, however these data would support routine patellar resurfacing and use of the cemented fixed bearing option for the Profix arthroplasty

Between 1995 and 1998, eighty revision total knee arthroplasties were done for the primary reason of advanced polyethylene wear. The primary arthroplasties prosthesis that failed included thirty-four mobile bearing knees and forty-six fixed bearing knees. In thirty-four Low Contact Stress (LCS) mobile bearing knees, osteolysis was identified intraoperatively in sixteen knees (forty-seven per cent). There were varying of fixation methods included nine cemented, four cementless and three hybrids. In forty-six fixed bearing knees, osteolysis was identified intraoperatively in six knees (thirteen per cent). The fixation methods of prostheses included two cemented and four cementless. The incidence of osteolysis was statistically significant difference between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing knees (p< 0.02). Both scattering electron microscope (SEM) and light scattering analysis were used to examine the UHMWPE wear debris collected from tissue sample. The particle size analyzed by light-scattering is coincident with the measurement by SEM. The major type of wear debris extracted from failed knee prostheses is granular shape. There are more granular wear debris appear in the mobile bearing knees than in the fixed bearing knees. The particle size of UHMWPE wear debris with osteolysis was significantly smaller than that without osteolysis. The high rate of osteolytic lesions in mobile bearing knee (LCS) is well illustrated in our result that a lot of fine UHMWPE wear debris generated in the Low Contact Stress knee. The result also illustrates that there is no relationship between fixation methods and the third body wear that associate with osteolysis

Introduction. Unidirectional mobile bearing knees (RP) were developed to optimise the tibio-femoral articulation in an effort to enhance function and reduce polyethylene wear. The self aligning bearing should also benefit the patello-femoral joint further improving outcome. This study was designed to assess whether these potential benefits are realised in the clinical setting. Methods. A total of 352 patients undergoing a PS PFC Sigma TKR were randomly allocated to receive either a Mobile Bearing (176 knees) or a Fixed Bearing (176 knees) tibial tray. Within each group a further randomisation for patella resurfacing versus retention was included. All knees were scored using standard tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patella Score) by independent nurse specialists. At 5 year review there had been 38 deaths (19 in each group), 5 revisions (4 fixed, 1 RP), 7 late patella resurfacings (4 fixed, 3 RP) and a small number of other patients had withdrawn, leaving 142 fixed bearing knees and 144 mobile bearing knees for evaluation. Results. The rotating platform TKR design had no impact on range of motion, Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society knee and function scores when compared to its fixed bearing equivalent at minimum 5 year follow-up. Patella resurfacing, however, resulted in a greater improvement in knee function score from pre-op when compared to patella retention (25.5 vs 15.5, p=0.0015), with subsequent significant benefits seen in the SF-12 Physical and Total Scores (p=0.0004 and p=0.017 respectively). 5 year survivorship curves with revision for any cause as the endpoint were similar for both groups (fixed 96.2%, mobile 97.6%). This survivorship rises to 100% for both designs when considering aseptic loosening alone. Conclusion. There was no difference in performance between the fixed and RP groups. Patella resurfacing offered advantages over patella retention with this design and we would recommend its routine use

Introduction. Unidirectional mobile bearing knees (RP) were developed to optimise the tibio-femoral articulation in an effort to enhance function and reduce polyethylene wear. The self-aligning bearing should also benefit the patello-femoral joint further improving outcome. This study was designed to assess whether these potential benefits are realised in the clinical setting. Methods. A total of 352 patients undergoing a PS PFC Sigma TKR were randomly allocated to receive either a Mobile Bearing (176 knees) or a Fixed Bearing (176 knees) tibial tray. Within each group a further randomisation for patella resurfacing versus retention was included. All knees were scored using standard outcome tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patella Score) by independent nurse specialists. Results. At 5 year review there had been 38 deaths (19 in each group), 5 revisions (4 fixed, 1 RP), 7 late patella resurfacings (4 fixed, 3 RP) and a small number of other patients had withdrawn, leaving 142 fixed bearing knees and 144 mobile bearing knees for evaluation. The rotating platform TKR design had no impact on range of motion, Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society knee and function scores when compared to its fixed bearing equivalent at minimum 5 year follow-up. Patella resurfacing, however, resulted in a greater improvement in knee function score from pre-op when compared to patella retention (25.5 vs 15.5, p=0.0015), with subsequent significant benefits seen in the SF-12 Physical and Total Scores (p=0.0004 and p=0.017 respectively). 5 year survivorship curves with revision for any cause as the endpoint were similar for both groups (fixed 96.2%, mobile 97.6%). This survivorship rises to 100% for both designs when considering aseptic loosening alone. Conclusion. There was no difference in performance between the fixed and RP groups. Patella resurfacing offered advantages over patella retention with this design and we would recommend its routine use

Medial unicompartmental replacement (UKR) has been shown to have superior functional results to total knee replacement (TKR) in appropriately selected patients, and this has been associated with a resurgence of interest in the procedure. This may relate to evidence showing that the kinematic profile of UKR is similar to the normal knee, in comparison to TKR, which has abnormal kinematics. Concerns remain over the survivorship of UKR and work has suggested the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) may become dysfunctional over time. Cruciate mechanism dysfunction would produce poor kinematics and instability providing a potential mechanism of failure for the UKR. Aim: To test the hypothesis that the sagittal plane kinematics (and cruciate mechanism) of a fixed bearing medial UKR deteriorate over time (short to long term). A cross sectional study was designed in which 24 patients who had undergone successful UKR were recruited and divided into early (2–5 years) and late (> 9 years) groups according to time since surgery. Patients performed flexion/extension against gravity, and a step up. Video fluoroscopy of these activities was used to obtain the Patellar Tendon Angle (PTA), the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the patella tendon, as a function of knee flexion. This is a previously validated method of assessing sagittal plane kinematics of a knee joint. This work suggests the sagittal plane kinematics of a fixed bearing UKR is maintained in the long term. There is no evidence that the cruciate mechanism has failed at ten years. However, increased tibial bearing conformity from ‘dishing’, and adequate muscle control, cannot be ruled out as possible mechanisms for the satisfactory kinematics observed in the long term for this UKA

Purpose: There are numerous papers from specialist arthroplasty centres outlining results of total knee arthroplasties but little information from outside these major centres. We carried out a review of a fixed bearing total condylar knee replacement used in Dunedin by a variety of surgeons for over 10 years. Method: All patients who received a Duracon/PCA fixed bearing total knee replacement between 1992 and 1996 were assessed clinically, fluoroscopically and completed an SF12, WOMAC and IKSS questionnaire. Results: At a mean 9.7 (8–12) years follow up, 126 (69.6%) patients were available for review and 46 (25%) were deceased. The average age was 72 years (52–88) and the primary diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 95% of the cases. There were 34% Charnley Grade A, 37% Grade B and 29% Grade C respectively. The average IKS Knee score was 72 (23–97) and the functional score was 68 (0–100) with 74% experiencing none or only mild pain. The SF12 assessment revealed a mean physical score of 55 (14–99). Ninety per cent of patients were satisfied with their knee and 89% would have the operation again if required. There was one operative death (PE), one deep infection, 3 PE’s, 3 DVT’s and 5 superficial infections. An MUA was required in 9 cases. Eight knees were revised. Using ‘all revisions’ as an end point. The survival rate was 95.3% at 10 years. Conclusion: These results suggest that knee replacements carried out outside specialist arthroplasty centres perform very well with a survival rate of the implant of 95% at 10 years

Background. Wear and fatigue damage to polyethylene components remain major factors leading to complications after total knee and unicompartmental arthroplasty. A number of wear simulations have been reported using mechanical test equipment as well as computer models. Computational models of knee wear have generally not replicated experimental wear under diverse conditions. This is partly because of the complexity of quantifying the effect of cross-shear at the articular interface and partly because the results of pin-on-disk experiments cannot be extrapolated to total knee arthroplasty wear. Our premise is that diverse experimental knee wear simulation studies are needed to generate validated computational models. We combined five experimental wear simulation studies to develop and validate a finite-element model that accurately predicted polyethylene wear in high and low crosslinked polyethylene, mobile and fixed bearing, and unicompartmental (UKA) and tricompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Low crosslinked polyethylene (PE). A finite element analysis (FEA) of two different experimental wear simulations involving TKA components of low crosslinked polyethylene inserts, with two different loading patterns and knee kinematics conducted in an AMTI knee wear simulator: a low intensity and a high intensity. Wear coefficients incorporating contact pressure, sliding distance, and cross-shear were generated by inverse FEA using the experimentally measured volume of wear loss as the target outcome measure. The FE models and wear coefficients were validated by predicting wear in a mobile bearing UKA design. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE). Two FEA models were constructed involving TKA and UKA XLPE inserts with different loading patterns and knee kinematics conducted in an AMTI knee wear simulator. Wear coefficients were generated by inverse FEA. Results. Predicted wear rates were within 5% of experimental wear rates during validation tests. Unicompartmental mobile bearing back-side wear accounted for 46% of the total wear in the mobile bearing. Wear during the swing phase was 38% to 44% of total wear. Discussion & Conclusions. Crosslinking polyethylene primarily decreased (by nearly 10-fold) the wear generated by cross-shear. This result can be explained by the reduced propensity of crosslinked polyethylene molecules to orient in the dominant direction of sliding. A highly crosslinked fixed-bearing polyethylene insert can provide high wear performance without the increased risk for mobile bearing dislocation. Finite element analysis can be a robust and efficient method for predicting experimental wear. The value of this model is in rapidly conducting screening studies for design development, assessing the effect of varying patient activity, and assessing newer biomaterials. This FEA model was experimentally validated but requires clinical validation

Purpose: As part of the step-wise introduction of a meniscal-bearing total knee replacement (Oxford TMK) we needed to know, before proceeding to longer term studies, whether its early clinical results were at least as good as those of an established fixed bearing device (AGC). Material and Methods: With ethical approval, patients requiring bilateral knee replacement for osteoarthritis consented to have the operations under one anaesthetic using one of each prosthesis; to accept random choice of knee; and to remain ignorant which side was which. American Knee Society Scores, Oxford Knee Scores, ROM and pain scores were to be recorded preoperatively and at one year. By January 2001, 40 patients had reached one year and data is available for 36. Results: Preoperatively there was no difference between the two knees. One patient died in the peri-operative period. Results at one year (TMK first): AKSS(Knee) 91.6 / 84.1 (p=0.003), OKS 39.8 / 37.6 (p=0.006), ROM 104 / 104 (p=0.364), Pain (AKSS) 47.3 / 41.7 (p=0.01), Pain (OKS) 3.5 / 2.9 (p=0.006). Conclusion: The TMK performed as well as the AGC. Its AKSS, OKS and pain scores were significantly better. We believe this controlled, blinded trial is the first to have compared the function of a new knee prosthesis with a standard implant before marketing; and the first to have demonstrated a significant clinical advantage for a meniscal-bearing over a fixed bearing TKR. The comparison of bilateral implants in the same patient can reveal significant differences while putting at risk many fewer subjects than would be needed for a classical twocohort RCT

Purpose: In this ongoing trial we are analysing the performance of both a fixed bearing total knee replacement and a mobile bearing total knee replacement using gait analysis and a patient-based questionnaire. We aim to find out if there is a difference in the functional performance of the two types of prosthesis. Method: Patients are taken from the in-patient waiting list of three consultants and introduced to the trial if deemed suitable. Each patient is analysed once pre-operatively and on three occasions post-operatively (6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year) at the university gait analysis laboratory. At each visit various anthropological measurements are recorded and the patient fills in an “Activities of Daily Living” questionnaire. After calibration and measurement of the passive range of motion of both knees each patient has their gait analysed over a series of six walks using a standard 5 camera system with skin marker clusters, the kinematic data from this is supplemented with force-plate recordings and video analysis of each set of walks. Data is recorded for both of the patient’s knees. The staff in the gait analysis laboratory are blinded as to which prosthesis has been used for each patient in an effort to eliminate bias. We present our methodology and some preliminary results

Recently mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become more popular. However, the advantages of mobile bearing (MB) PS TKA still remain unclear especially from a kinematic point of view. The objective of this study was to investigate the difference and advantage in kinematics of mobile baring PS TKA compared with fixed bearing (FB) PS TKA. Femorotibial nearest positions for 20 subjects (20 knees), 10 knees implanted with NexGen Legacy flex with mobile bearing PS TKA, and 10 knees implanted with NexGen Legacy flex with fixed bearing PS TKA were analyzed using the sagittal plane fluoroscopic images. All the knees were implanted by a single surgeon. All the subjects performed weight bearing deep knee bending motion. The average range of motion between femoral component and tibial component was 119±18 in MB and 122±10 in FB. The axial rotation of the femoral component was 11.8±6.2 in MB and 11.8±4.9 in FB. There was no significant difference both in range of motion and axial rotation between BM and FB. The kinematic pathway pattern was externally rotated due to a lateral pivot pattern in both MB and FB. In four subjects, more than 12°axial rotation was observed in knees implanted with FB TKA which allows only 12°axial rotation. The data in this study demonstrates that there was no significant difference in kinematics of weight bearing deep knee bending motion. The advantage of MB is allowance of axial rotation which restricted until 12 °in FB NexGen Legacy flex PS TKA

Introduction and Aims: The study was designed to compare the early results, prospectively, of the fixed-bearing Zimmer NexGen cruciate retaining (CR) and the Zimmer NexGen mobile-bearing knee (MBK) knee arthroplasty. The study was designed to determine whether differences exist in the clinical outcomes between patients receiving different types of bearings. Method: Patients were randomly assigned to receiving either fixed or mobile bearings. Patients were blinded but not assessors to the type of arthroplasty. The study commenced in June 2000. By November 2002, 69 and 70 patients had been recruited into the CR and MBK groups respectively. Consultants were present in 92% of operations and the rest were performed by a senior registrar. The major indication was osteoarthritis (64 CR: 65 MBK). The surgical approach was medial parapatellar in 65 CR and 63 MBK the rest were subvastus, patella resurfacing was not routinely employed. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data was collated. Results: The body mass index was 32 ± 7 CR and 32 ± 6 MBK. The average age was 67 ± 8 CR and 67 ± 8 MBK. Pain in the contralateral knee was present in 79.7% CR and 74.3% MBK group. Minimum post-operative follow-up was one year. There was no significant difference in the pre-operative and post-operative fixed flexion contracture, 4.3 ± 5.4 to 1.0 ± 2.9 CR and 6.2 ± 6.9 to 0.9 ± 2.8. The mean flexion pre-operatively and post-operatively between the two groups was not significantly different 108 ± 19 to 105 ± 16 CR and 107 ± 15 to 102 ± 13. Patello-femoral joint symptoms diminished from 67% to 12% CR and from 69% to 21% in the MBK group. The dependence on walking aids diminished from 50.7% to 16.7% CR and 51.4% to 26.9% MBK. At one year, nine percent and 21% were dissatisfied in the CR and MBK groups respectively. In the CR group, two revisions had been performed, one for infection and the other for arthrolysis and poly exchange. Two revisions had been carried out in the MBK group, one for extreme ‘clunking’ and the other for arthrolysis with poly exchange. Conclusions: The one-year results suggest that the levels of dissatisfaction and patello-femoral problems are significantly greater in the mobile bearing group as opposed the fixed bearing. The early results would not encourage the use of the mobile bearings. We await the long-term results as regards survivorship of the bearings

Purpose. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the preferred treatment for those with end stage osteoarthritis (OA) and severe functional limitations. With the demographic transition in society, TKA is being offered to a younger patient population. Younger patients are generally more active requiring an increased range of motion, and place greater physiological demands on the prosthesis than typical older patients. The mobile bearing (MB) total knee prosthesis has theoretically been designed to meet these demands. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of MB and fixed bearing (FB) TKA. Method. After testing for publication bias and heterogeneity, the data were aggregated by fixed effects modelling. Our searches identified 14 studies for reporting our primary outcome of Knee Society Scores (KSS). We also pooled data for post-operative range of motion (ROM) and Hospital for Special Surgery scores (HSS). Results. The standard difference in mean outcome scores for KSS and HSS demonstrated no difference between groups (p = 0.902, and p = 0.426 respectively). Similarly, the pooled data for ROM showed no difference between groups (p = 0.265). Conclusion. The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature indicate that there are no significant differences between MB and FB TKA in the outcome measures of KSS, ROM or HSS at final follow up. Only 3 of 12 studies found any benefit of MB knees in terms of patient reported pain. There were no differences found between FB and MB regarding patellar instability or stair climbing ability. Implant longevity remains the only outcome measure in which MB implants may provide an advantage

Clinical experience has shown the needs for high flexion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a fixed bearing high flexion posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Between July 2001 and December 2005, 422 TKAs in 288 patients were performed with high flexion PS prosthesis and 378 knees of 258 patients had been followed up for 2 to 6.5 years (mean: 3 years 11 months). We evaluated range of motion (ROM), Knee rating system of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and Knee Society (KS) score, and radiological results. The mean flexion improved from 110.1 degrees to 126.7 degrees at the latest follow-up. 333 knees (88 %) showed more than 120 degrees of flexion, 105 knees (28 %) more than 140 degrees of flexion. The mean KS clinical score improved from 39 to 93 points (p< 0.01) and KS function score, from 40 to 85.4 points (p< 0.01). The mean HSS score improved from 41.2 to 86.3 points (p< 0.01). In 28 knees, radiolucent line of 1–2 mm in width was observed at zone 1 without symptoms. Aseptic loosening in 4 knees, Mid-flexion instability in 2 knees, superficial infection in 3 knees and deep infection in 3 knees were observed. Total knee arthroplasty with high flexion PS prosthesis showed good ROM and satisfactory early clinical results. Complication rate was similar to those of other series. Close observation and serial radiological evaluation are needed for long term results

Summary. We report a large study of 331 patients at two years post operation who were prospectively randomised to receive either a rotating platform or a fixed bearing knee replacement of an otherwise identical design. Introduction. The mobile bearing total knee replacement was developed as there are theoretical benefits in that it may allow a better range of motion, better patella tracking and lower wear rates. This study was designed to see if these potential advantages are borne out in practice when using a cruciate retaining design. Methods. 331 patients undergoing TKR surgery were randomised to receive either a fixed bearing (170 patients) or a mobile bearing (161 patients). The femoral implant design was identical in the two groups. The tibial polyethylene bearing was either fixed in the metallic tibial tray (FB) or of rotating platform design (RP). All patients were assessed pre-operatively and at two years post-operatively using standard tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patellar Score) by independent nurse specialists. Results. The groups who received the FB and the RP implants have been assessed and their pre-operative to two year outcomes analysed with regard to the improvement in the range of motion (9.1 v. 10.2 degrees), Oxford Knee Score (-19.2 v. -17.6) and American Knee Society Knee and Function scores (51.3 v. 49.5 and 25.3 v. 23.6) at two years follow up. Conclusion. This large study shows that there is no statistical difference between a FB and a RP cruciate retaining TKR at two years post operation

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become a successful clinical treatment for patients in regard to relief of pain, correction of deformity and restoration of function with promising long term behaviour [Pradhan et al. 2006]. In TKA the generation of polyethylene wear debris is mainly affected by the factors design of the articulating bearing, contact stresses, kinematics, implant material and surface finish [McEwen et al. 2005]. The objective of our study was to evaluate the in vitro wear behaviour of fixed bearing knee designs in comprehension to the contact mechanics and resultant kinematics for different degrees of congruency. Material and Methods: Wear simulator testing on 12 TKA devices has been performed according to ISO 14243-1 under load control. The knee replacements were tested in the fixed bearing configurations LC, CR and DD with different degrees of tibio-femoral congruency. For gravimetric wear assessment the protocol described in ISO 14243-2 has been used, followed by a kinematic analysis of the single test stations. The articulating contact and subsurface stresses have been investigated in a finite element analysis. Results: The contact areas are increasing from Search® Evolution LC (144 mm2) to Columbus® CR (235 mm2) and Columbus® DD (279 mm2), whereas the peak surface contact stresses are decreasing from Search® Evolution LC (34.4 MPa) to Columbus® CR (20.9 MPa) and Columbus® DD (18.1 MPa). The estimated amount of wear has decreased from Search® Evolution LC (21.4 mg/million cycles) to Columbus® CR (8.9 mg/million cycles) and Columbus® DD (2.2 mg/million cycles). The wear rates between the knee design configurations differ substantially and statistically analysis demonstrates a significant difference (p< 0.01) between the test groups in correlation with congruency. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates the influence of different bearing types on contact stresses, abrasive wear and kinematics for three different degrees of tibio-femoral congruency under elimination of production, material and sterilization parameters. Corresponding author: Dr.-Ing. Thomas M. Grupp. Research and Development: e-mail: . thomas.grupp@aesculap.de

Introduction There are only a limited number of long term studies of total knee arthroplasty but none with a minimum 15 year survivorship of a modular fixed bearing posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis. Methods We present a consecutive series of 139 total knee arthroplasties (109 patients, average age 67 years), using a non-conforming posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis, followed for a minimum of 15 years (range, 15.0 to 16.9 years). The patella was resurfaced with an all-polyethylene component in 83% of knees. The tibial component was always cemented, while a porous coated femoral component was used in 84% of knees. Fortyfive patients (59 knees) were followed-up for a minimum of 15 years, 57 (70 knees) had died, five patients (8 knees) were too ill to assess, two patients (two knees) were considered lost to follow-up. Results In this series there were five re-operations, four of which were for polyethylene insert wear. At two of these, the patella was exchanged for early surface wear and one patella was resurfaced for the first time. There was one loose cemented femoral component after more than 15 years. The survival without revision or need for revision for any reason was 99% at 10 years and 95.6% (worst case scenario of 94.2%) at 15 years. The mean Knee Society Score and Function Score at 15 year follow-up was 96 and 78 respectively. The total incidence of radiolucent lines was 13%, with two percent around the femur, 11% around the tibia and zero percent around the patella. None of these lines were of any clinical relevance. There was no evidence of progressive radiolucent lines or component loosening, and one case of zone four femoral osteolysis. Conclusions This single-surgeon series with a minimum 15 year follow-up, and excellent clinical, radiological and survivorship results provides a benchmark upon which other long term studies of modular fixed bearing posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty can be compared. In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source

Recently mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become more popular. However, the advantages of mobile bearing (MB) PS TKA still remain unclear especially from a kinematic point of view. The objective of this study was to investigate the difference and advantage in kinematics of mobile baring PS TKA compared with fixed bearing (FB) PS TKA. Femorotibial nearest positions for 19 subjects (20 knees), 10 knees implanted with NexGen Legacy flex (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN)with mobile bearing PS TKA, and 10 knees implanted with NexGen Legacy flex (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN)with fixed bearing PS TKA were analyzed using the sagittal plane fluoroscopic images. All the knees were implanted by a single surgeon. All the subjects performed weight bearing deep knee bending motion. We evaluated range of motion, axial rotation of the femoral component, AP translation of medial and lateral sides. The average range of motion between femoral component and tibial component was 119°±18° in MB and 122°±10 ° in FB. The axial rotation of the femoral component was 11.8°±6.2° in MB and 11.8°±4.9° in FB. There was no significant difference both in range of motion and axial rotation between MB and FB. The AP translation of MB and FB showed same patterns. They were rollback in early flexion, the lateral pivot pattern (the medial condyle moved forward significantly compared with the lesser amount of AP translation for the lateral condyle) at mid flexion, and bicondylar rollback at deep flexion. The rollback in early flexion was 3.4mm in MB and 1.8mm in FB at medial side, 4.2mm in MB and 4.8mm in FB at lateral side. There was no significant difference. The lateral pivot pattern, which moved anteriorly, was 7.8mm in MB and 7.0mm in FB at medial side, 3.0mm in MB and 2.4mm in FB at lateral side. There was no significant difference. The bicondylar rollback at deep flexion was 6.4mm in MB and 7.7mm in FB at medial side, 6.9mm in MB and 4.8mm in FB at lateral side. In four subjects, more than 12°axial rotation was observed in knees implanted with FB TKA which allows only 12°axial rotation. The results in this study demonstrate that there was no significant difference in kinematics of weight bearing deep knee bending motion between MB and FB. The advantage of MB is allowance of axial rotation which restricted until 12° in FB NexGen Legacy flex PS TKA

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcome results of the Scorpio PS TKA prosthesis with either a mobile (MB) or fixed bearing (FB) Pe insert. We hypothesized that the MB group would perform better over time in clinical and functional outcome as well as showing a reduction in anterior knee pain occurrence. Methods: In a prospective, randomised, single centre, multi surgeon clinical study, a total of 100 patients were enrolled equally divided between MB and FB groups. A standard surgical protocol was used for implanting the Scorpio knee prosthesis with either an MB or FB insert. Post-op rehabilitation was standardized and unrelated to insert type. Patients were assessed pre-op and after 3–6-12–24 months post-op. RAND-36 and Knee Society Score (KSS), were assessed as well as pain measurement during functional testing (chair rise and stair climb) using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale. X-rays were assessed for implant positioning, migration, radiolucent lines and patella tilt (using a Skyline view in 30–60 and 90 degrees). Results: Both tests groups showed a statistical significant decrease of VAS pain score over time (p < 0.01). No significant differences were seen between both groups at any time point. results did show the MB group to have less pain the first postoperative year in both chair rise test and stair climb test tests. No statistically significant differences were found in total range of motion between the two groups. Repeated measures tests showed a significant improvement over time for both groups for KSS and most RAND 35 subscores. There were no significant differences between groups at any given follow up moment. Within 8 out of 9 RAND 36 subdivisions showed the MB group to score non significantly better the first postoperative year. After one year the differences disappeared. Radiology showed stable implants with no progressive radiolucent lines in all patients. No significant differences in patellar tilting were found. Discussion: Our hypothesis, that the MB prostheses would provide a better ROM and less anterior knee pain, was not confirmed by the results. In our study the MB group showed less decrease in ROM immediately postop. This phenomenon was also seen by Harrington et al. The MB prosthesis regained its ROM after surgery earlier than the FB implants. This difference could potentially be attributed to the implant design and its kinematics. This advantage did not persist and the FB group slowly leveled. In conclusion, our study does not show any clear advantages in terms of function, pain, ROM, general health, radiological evaluation, KSS and RAND 36 of MB compared with FB TKA at a follow-up of 2 years

To evaluate prospectively the mid-term results of the Zimmer Unicondylar Knee arthoplasty (UKA).

Between 2005 and 2012, 187 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) were performed by a single surgeon using a fixed-bearing prosthesis (Zimmer). 37 cases were excluded as either were lost to follow-up or had less than six months follow-up. The study included 150 UKAs. Deformity, if present, was correctable. Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) disease was not considered as an absolute contraindication. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range 42–88 years); 78 of which were male. Mean follow-up time was 3.6 years (range 7–81 months). Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 29 (range 21–41). Clinical and conventional radiological evaluations were carried out at six months, one, two and five years postoperatively.

147 cases were medial compartment replacement and three were lateral. 86 patients had grade III OA and 64 had grade IV (Kellgren and Lawrence). 113 patients had an element of PFJ disease. The mean Knee Society knee and function scores had an improvement from 55 and 54 points pre-operatively to 95 and 94 points respectively at time of most recent evaluation. The average flexion improved from 116 degrees pre-operatively to 127 degrees. Two cases were revised, one due to progression of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment of the knee and the other was due to arthrofibrosis.

The Zimmer unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provided excellent pain relief and restoration of function in carefully selected patients. However, long-term studies are necessary to investigate the survival rate for this prothesis.

Background: Mobile-bearing knee replacements have some theoretical advantages over fixed-bearing devices. However, very few randomized controlled clinical trials have been published to date, and studies showed little clinical and subjective advantages for the mobile-bearing using traditional systems of scoring. The choice of the ideal outcome measure to assess total joint replacement remains a complex issue. However, gait analysis provides objective and quantifying evidences of treatment evaluation. Significant methodological advances are currently made in gait analysis laboratories and ambulatory gait devices are now available. The goal of this study was to provide gait parameters as a new objective method to assess total knee arthroplasty outcome between patients with fixed- and mobile-bearing, using an ambulatory device with minimal sensor configuration.

This randomized controlled double-blind study included to date 14 patients: the gait signatures of four patients with mobile-bearing were compared to the gait signatures of nine patients with fixed-bearing pre-operatively and post-operatively at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Each participant was asked to perform two walking trials of 30m long at his/her preferred speed and to complete a EQ-5D questionnaire, a WOMAC and Knee Society Score (KSS). Lower limbs rotations were measured by four miniature angular rate sensors mounted respectively, on each shank and thigh.

A new method for a portable system for gait analysis has been developed with very encouraging results regarding the objective outcome of total knee arthroplasty using mobile- and fixed-bearings.

Conventional fixed-bearing (FB) knee prostheses have been proved clinically successful. Rotating platform, mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacements (TKR) have been developed to improve knee kinematics, lower contact stresses on the polyethylene tibial component, minimize constraint, and allow implant self-alignment. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the functional outcome of FB- and MB- TKR during gait and deep knee bends, using a motion analysis system. Two groups of five patients with a unilateral FB TKR (PFC) or MB TKR (LCS) underwent a gait analysis study. The normal contralateral limb was used as a control to compare data in the stance phase of gait. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were equivalent in the 2 groups. Both MB and FB TKRs gave good functional results in spite of different design rationales. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between the two groups. However, gait and knee function after TKR was abnormal even though the patients were asymptomatic. A flexional pattern for flex-ion-extension moments at the knee during level walking was present in both types of TKR. Differences in rotational moments between the two groups were observed, with a higher internal rotational moment in the PFC group (PFC, 0.14 Nm/kg; LCS, 0.09 Nm/kg; p=0.094). A stressful weightbearing activity, such as deep knee bends, amplified the functional differences between the different prosthetic designs, indicating that knee kinematics are activity-dependent. Kinetic and kinematic differences noted between the 2 groups reflect different patterns of joint surface motion and loading, with postulated effects on long term failure of the implants through wear, mechanical failure, and loosening. Gait analysis using external skin markers has a limited role in the characterization of the joint surface motion of the prosthetic knee during ambulatory activities because of errors and assumptions inherent in the technique. However, it provides scope for the study of kinetic parameters acting on different knee prostheses during gait.

Introduction

Mobile-bearing TKRs allow some axial rotation and may provide a more natural patellar movement. The aim was to compare patellar kinematics among the normal knee, fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing TKR.

Introduction

There is conflicting evidence about the merits of using mobile bearings at total knee replacement (TKR), partly because most randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have not been adequately powered.

Background: Mobile-bearing knee replacements have some theoretical advantages over fixed-bearing devices. However, very few randomized controlled clinical trials have been published to date, and studies showed little clinical and subjective advantages for the mobile-bearing using traditional systems of scoring.

The choice of the ideal outcome measure to assess total joint replacement remains a complex issue. However, gait analysis provides objective and quantifying evidences of treatment evaluation. Significant methodological advances are currently made in gait analysis laboratories and ambulatory gait devices are now available.

The goal of this study was to provide gait parameters as a new objective method to assess total knee arthroplasty outcome between patients with fixed- and mobile-bearing, using an ambulatory device with minimal sensor configuration.

Methods: This randomized controlled double-blind study included to date 31 patients: the gait signatures of 12 patients with mobile-bearing were compared to the gait signatures of 19 patients with fixed-bearing pre-operatively and post-operatively at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Each participant was asked to perform two walking trials of 30m long at his/her preferred speed and to complete a EQ-5D questionnaire, a WOMAC and Knee Society Score (KSS). Lower limbs rotations were measured by four miniature angular rate sensors mounted respectively, on each shank and thigh.

Results: Better relative differences between pre-operative and post-operative 3 months and 6 months KSS (122% vs 34% at 3 months, 138% vs 36% at 6 months) and KSS function (154% vs 8% at 3 months, 183% vs 42% at 6 months) scores were observed for the fixed-bearing compared to the mobile-bearing. The same better improvements for fixed-bearing were also found with the range of knee angles (Affected side: 31% vs −5% at 3 months, 47% vs 5% at 6 months), (Unaffected side: 16% vs 5% at 3 months, 15% vs 6% at 6 months) and peak swing speeds of shank (Affected side: 18% vs −2% at 3 months, 30% vs 4% at 6 months), (Unaffected side: 8% vs −3% at 3 months, 7% vs 4% at 6 months).

Conclusions: A new method for a portable system for gait analysis has been developed with very encouraging results regarding the objective outcome of total knee arthroplasty using mobile- and fixed-bearings.

Introduction: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has seen a resurgence in the past decade. Perpetuation of this trend can only be supported through prospective demonstration of efficacy with validated outcomes measures.

Materials & Methods: Thirty-three consecutive cemented medial Miller-Galante UKA’s (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) were performed in 32 patients (7 males/25 females; mean age of 67 ± 9 years). Average weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) of the patient population was 189 ± 31 lbs (Range, 145–293), 65 ± 4 in (range, 60–75), and 33 ± 5 BMI (range, 25–43), respectively. Average polyethylene thickness (as labelled) for this cohort was 8.3mm (range, 8–12mm). Outcomes were prospectively assessed via the SF-12, WOMAC, and Knee Society Score (KSS). No patients were lost to follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship and Student’s t-test were performed using GraphPad Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

Results: Minimum follow-up was 39 months with a mean follow up period of 49 (range, 39–59) months. One knee was converted at 6 months at another institution to a TKA. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis reported 97% survivorship at 59 months (95% CI). Of the 32 knees remaining, mean preoperative KSS and WOMAC pain scores improved significantly from 52 ± 7 (range, 37–67) to 89 ± 9 (range, 67–100) (p< 0.0001) and from 40 ± 22 (range, 0–80) to 93 ± 14 (range, 35–100) (p< 0.0001), respectively. Additionally, average SF-12 Physical Component scores significantly increased from 30 ± 7 (range, 18–51) at baseline to 49 ± 10 (range, 28–59) at time of follow-up (p< 0.0001). Overall stiffness and physical function assessed via the WOMAC index also exhibited statistically significant improvement, bettering from mean baseline scores of 54 ± 24 (range, 0–100) and 52 ± 19 (range, 25–87) to 84 ± 19 (range, 50–100, p< 0.0001) and 88 ± 15 (range, 44–100, p< 0.0001), respectively. No significant cement/bone interface radiolucencies were found upon thorough radiographic review at 3 years post UKA.

Discussion & Conclusion: The significant improvements observed in knee function & stiffness, and decreases in pain at a mean of 4 years after medial UKA are encouraging. Coinciding results from the physical component of the SF-12 assessment indicate reassurance of physical improvements regarding patient lifestyle. 97% survivorship in the short term would be discouraging if not for the specific circumstances of the sole conversion to TKA. This specific patient went against the advice of the operative surgeon and solicited services at an outside institution in conversion to a TKA despite markedly improved function (Pre-op/3 month post-op WOMAC and KSS of 30/75 and 60/91). Clinical and radiographic follow-up will continue in order to assess the long-term efficacy of medial UKA with the Miller-Galante prosthesis using strict patient selection criteria.

There is conflicting evidence about the merits of mobile bearings in total knee replacement, partly because most randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have not been adequately powered. We report the results of a multicentre RCT of mobile versus fixed bearings. This was part of the knee arthroplasty trial (KAT), where 539 patients were randomly allocated to mobile or fixed bearings and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) plus secondary measures including Short Form-12, EuroQol EQ-5D, costs, cost-effectiveness and need for further surgery. There was no significant difference between the groups pre-operatively: mean OKS was 17.18 (. sd. 7.60) in the mobile-bearing group and 16.49 (. sd. 7.40) in the fixed-bearing group. At five years mean OKS was 33.19 (. sd. 16.68) and 33.65 (. sd. 9.68), respectively. There was no significant difference between trial groups in OKS at five years (-1.12 (95% confidence interval -2.77 to 0.52) or any of the other outcome measures. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with knee-related re-operations or in total costs. In this appropriately powered RCT, over the first five years after total knee replacement functional outcomes, re-operation rates and healthcare costs appear to be the same irrespective of whether a mobile or fixed bearing is used. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:486–92

Introduction. Backside wear of polyethylene (PE) inlays in fixed-bearing total knee replacement (TKR) generates high number of wear debris, but is poorly studied in modern plants with improved locking mechanisms. Aim of study. Retrieval analysis of PE inlays from contemporary fixed bearing TKRs - to evaluate the relationship between backside wear and liner locking mechanism and material type and roughness of the tibial tray. Methods. MATERIAL. We included five types of implants, revised after min. 12 months (14–71): three models with a peripheral locking rim and two models with a dove-tail locking mechanism. Altogether this study included 15 inlays were removed from TKRs with CoCr alloy tray with a roughened surface and a peripheral locking lip liner (Stryker Triathlon, Ra 5,61 µm), 9 from CoCr trays with peripheral locking lip and untreated surface (Aesculap Search, Ra 0,81 µm), 13 from Ti alloy trays with peripheral locking lip and untreated surface (DePuy PFC Sigma 0,61 µm), 11 from Ti alloy trays with untreated surface and dovetail locking mechanism (Zimmer NexGen, 0,34 µm), and 9 from iplants with a Ti alloy tibial tray with mirror polished surface and dovetail locking mechanism (Smitn&Nephew Genesis II, 0,11 µm). METHODS. Wear of bearing surface and back side of retrieved inlays was examined in 10 sectors under a light microscope. Seven modes of wear were analysed and quantified according to the Hood scale: surface deformation, pitting, embedded third bodies, pitting, scratching, burnishing (polishing), abrasion and delamination. Damage of inlays caused by backside wear was also evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Roughness of tibial tray was evaluated using a contact profilometer. Results. We found no differences between wear scores on the articulating surface in all group, they did not correlate with backside wear scores in all groups as well. Compared to all other groups, backside wear scores were significantly higher in implants with untreated Ti alloy tibial tray (P<0,001 Wilcoxon test). Lowest wear rates were found in implants from both Ti and CoCr alloys and peripheral locking rim. Interestingly there was no difference between wear of implants with polished and untreated surface (Fig. 1). SEM analysis demonstrated different wear modes in implants with dovetail mechanism and peripheral rim. The first group demonstrated signs of gross rotational instability, with severe abrasion with an arch-shaped pattern and delaminated PE (Fig 2). In one design we observed severe extrusion of PE into screw holes of the tibial tray. Inlays from trays with peripheral rim presented two types of wear: flattening of machining marks or protrusion of the material caused by the rough surface (Fig 3). Conclusions. This study demonstrates that backside wear is still a problem in modern TKR. Our findings suggest that it is predominantly affected by type of locking mechanism (with peripheral rim performing better), to a lesser extent by surface roughness of the tibial component, while material type does not seem to play an important role. This study was funded by a grant from the National Science Centre nr 2012/05/D/NZ5/01840. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Aims

This study reports updates the previously published two-year clinical, functional, and radiological results of a group of patients who underwent transfibular total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), with follow-up extended to a minimum of five years.

Aims

It has been suggested that mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) might lead to better outcomes by accommodating some femorotibial rotational mismatch, thereby reducing contact stresses and polyethylene wear. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing versions of a contemporary TKA with respect to durability, range of movement (ROM) and function, ten years postoperatively.

Aims. Uncemented mobile bearing designs in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have seen an increase over the last decade. However, there are a lack of large-scale studies comparing survivorship of these specific designs to commonly used cemented mobile and fixed bearing designs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survivorship of these designs. Methods. A total of 21,610 medial UKAs from 2007 to 2018 were selected from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare uncemented mobile bearings with cemented mobile and fixed bearings. Adjustments were made for patient and surgical factors, with their interactions being considered. Reasons and type of revision in the first two years after surgery were assessed. Results. In hospitals performing less than 100 cases per year, cemented mobile bearings reported comparable adjusted risks of revision as uncemented mobile bearings. However, in hospitals performing more than 100 cases per year, the adjusted risk of revision was higher for cemented mobile bearings compared to uncemented mobile bearings (hazard ratio 1.78 (95% confidence interval 1.34 to 2.35)). The adjusted risk of revision between cemented fixed bearing and uncemented mobile bearing was comparable, independent of annual hospital volume. In addition, 12.3% of uncemented mobile bearing, 20.3% of cemented mobile bearing, and 41.5% of uncemented fixed bearing revisions were for tibial component loosening. The figures for instability were 23.6%, 14.5% and 11.7%, respectively, and for periprosthetic fractures were 10.0%, 2.8%, and 3.5%. Bearing exchange was the type of revision in 40% of uncemented mobile bearing, 24.3% of cemented mobile bearing, and 5.3% cemented fixed bearing revisions. Conclusion. The findings of this study demonstrated improved survival with use of uncemented compared to cemented mobile bearings in medial UKA, only in those hospitals performing more than 100 cases per year. Cemented fixed bearings reported comparable survival results as uncemented mobile bearings, regardless of the annual hospital volume. The high rates of instability, periprosthetic fractures, and bearing exchange in uncemented mobile bearings emphasize the need for further research. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1261–1269

Introduction. This is a multi-centre, prospective, observational study of 503 INFINITY fixed bearing total ankle arthroplasties. We report the minimum two-year results of this prosthesis which was introduced to the UK Market in 2014 and is now the most used ankle arthroplasty in the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Methods. Patients were recruited from 11 centres in the United Kingdom between June 2016 and November 2019. Demographic, radiographic, and functional outcome data (Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, Manchester Oxford Foot Ankle Questionnaire and Euroquol 5D-5L) were collected preoperatively, at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years and 5 years. The average age was 67.8 (range 23.9 to 88.5) and average BMI 29.3 (18.9 to 48.0). The COFAS grading system was used to stratify deformity. There were 261 (51.9%) COFAS Type 1, 122 (24.2%) COFAS Type 2, 31 (6.2%) COFAS 3 and 89 (17.7%) COFAS type 4. 38 patients (7.6%) presented with inflammatory arthritis. 99 (19.7%) implantations utilised patient specific instrumentation. Complications and reoperations were recorded as adverse events. Radiographs were assessed for lucencies, cysts and/or subsidence. Results. The mean follow up was 34.2 months (range 24–64). 15 patients have died, 8 withdrawn and 3 lost to follow up. 8 implants (1.6%) have been revised. According to the Glazebrook classification there were low grade complications in 6.6%, medium grade in 1.4% and high grade in 1.6%. There have been an additional 13 non revision re-operations (2.6%) at the latest follow up. There was a significant (p < 0.01) improvement across all functional outcome scores at a minimum of 2yr follow up. Discussion and conclusion. This large cohort has shown a low early revision rate and high functional outcomes with a low-profile fixed bearing prosthesis

Aims. The primary objective of this study was to compare migration of the cemented ATTUNE fixed bearing cruciate retaining tibial component with the cemented Press-Fit Condylar (PFC)-sigma fixed bearing cruciate retaining tibial component. The secondary objectives included comparing clinical and radiological outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Methods. A single blinded randomized, non-inferiority study was conducted including 74 patients. Radiostereometry examinations were made after weight bearing, but before hospital discharge, and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. PROMS were collected preoperatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Radiographs for measuring radiolucencies were collected at two weeks and two years postoperatively. Results. The overall migration (mean maximum total point motion (MPTM)) at two years was comparable: mean 1.13 mm (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97 to 1.30) for the ATTUNE and 1.16 mm (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.35) for the PFC-sigma. At two years, the mean backward tilting was -0.43° (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.21) for the ATTUNE and 0.08° (95% CI -0.16 to 0.31), for the PFC-sigma. Overall migration between the first and second postoperative year was negligible for both components. The clinical outcomes and PROMs improved compared with preoperative scores and were not different between groups. Radiolucencies at the implant-cement interface were mainly seen below the medial baseplate: 17% in the ATTUNE and 3% in the PFC-sigma at two weeks, and at two years 42% and 9% respectively (p = 0.001). Conclusion. In the first two postoperative years the initial version of the ATTUNE tibial component was not inferior with respect to overall migration, although it showed relatively more backwards tilting and radiolucent lines at the implant-cement interface than the PFC-sigma. The version of the ATTUNE tibial component examined in this study has subsequently undergone modification by the manufacturer. Level of Evidence: 1 (randomized controlled clinical trial). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1158–1166

Introduction. Both mobile bearing and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have demonstrated clinical success. However, much debate persists about the superiority of a single design. Currently most clinical data is based on high volume centers data, however to reduce bias, we undertook a through review of retrospective national joint registries. In this study, we aim to investigate UKA implant utilization and survivorship between 2000 and 2018. Methods. Ten annual joint registry reports of various nations were reviewed. Due to the variable statistical methods of reporting implant use and survivorship we focused on three registries: Australia (AOANJRR), New Zealand (NZJR), United Kingdom (NJR) for uniformity. We evaluated UKA usage, survivorship, utilization and revision rates for each implant. Implant survivorship was reported in the registries and was compared within nations due to variation in statistical reporting. Results. UKAs accounted for 7.24–10.3% of all primary knee surgeries. The most popular implants were, in order of popularity, the Oxford (ZimmerBiomet, Warsaw IN), ZUK (Smith & Nephew, Memphis TN / LimaCorporate, Udine, Italy), Sigma HP (DePuy, Warsaw IN), Miller-Galante (ZimmerBiomet Warsaw IN), and Preservation (DePuy, Warsaw IN) models. UKA revision rates varied by nation and ranged from 8.22%–12.8%. The Sigma HP and ZUK designs had the lowest total percent revised in the registries-Australian (3.6% and 5.1%, respectively) and New Zealand (2.5% and 1.96%, respectively)-and demonstrated among the highest 10-year survivorship in the United Kingdom registry. The United Kingdom registry reports a greater number of mobile versus fixed bearing UKA undergoing revision for dislocation and/or subluxation and instability. Conclusion. Preference for implant design as well as survivorship rates varied significantly by nation. The fixed bearing ZUK and Sigma HP implants were among the highest performing implants across the three registries

Aims. This is a multicentre, non-inventor, prospective observational study of 503 INFINITY fixed bearing total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs). We report our early experience, complications, and radiological and functional outcomes. Methods. Patients were recruited from 11 specialist centres between June 2016 and November 2019. Demographic, radiological, and functional outcome data (Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, Manchester Oxford Questionnaire, and EuroQol five-dimension five-level score) were collected preoperatively, at six months, one year, and two years. The Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) grading system was used to stratify deformity. Early and late complications and reoperations were recorded as adverse events. Radiographs were assessed for lucencies, cysts, and/or subsidence. Results. In all, 500 patients reached six-month follow-up, 420 reached one-year follow-up, and 188 reached two-year follow-up. The mean age was 67.8 years (23.9 to 88.5). A total of 38 patients (7.5%) presented with inflammatory arthritis. A total of 101 (20.0%) of implantations used patient-specific instrumentation; 167 patients (33.1%) underwent an additional procedure at the time of surgery. A total of seven patients died of unrelated causes, two withdrew, and one was lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up was 16.2 months (6 to 36). There was a significant improvement from baseline across all functional outcome scores at six months, one, and two years. There was no significant difference in outcomes with the use of patient-specific instrumentation, type of arthritis, or COFAS type. Five (1.0%) implants were revised. The overall complication rate was 8.8%. The non-revision reoperation rate was 1.4%. The 30-day readmission rate was 1.2% and the one-year mortality 0.74%. Conclusion. The early experience and complications reported in this study support the current use of the INFINITY TAA as a safe and effective implant in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1270–1276

Introduction. The mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design was introduced with the aim of reducing polyethylene wear and component loosening seen in the fixed-bearing (FB) design. A recent joint registry study has revealed increased risk for all-cause revision, but not revision for infection, in MB-TKA. We used the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) to compare all-cause revision rates, and revision rates for aseptic loosening of MB-TKA compared with fixed bearing (FB) TKA. Methods. All patients who underwent a primary TKA registered in the NZJR between the 1st January 1999 to 31st December 2021 were identified. Analysis compared MB to FB designs, with sub analysis of implants from a single company. We identified 135,707 primary TKAs, with 104,074 (76.7%) FB-TKAs and 31,633 (23.3%) MB-TKAs recorded. We examined all-cause revision rates, reasons for revision and performed survival analyses. Results. For all-comers, MB-TKA had an all-cause revision rate of 0.43/100-component-years (OCY) compared with 0.42/OCY for FB-TKA (p=0.09). The all-cause revision rate was higher for those age < 65 years (MB TKA 0.60/OCY vs. FB-TKA 0.59/OCY) compared to those > 65 years at time of primary TKA (MB-TKA 0.29/OCY vs. FB-TKA 0.32/OCY), however there was no statistically significant difference between implant design in either age group (p=0.16 and p=0.64; respectively). Similarly, there was no difference in revision rates for aseptic loosening between implant designs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrates no statistically significant difference in revision-free survival of implants, with both MB-TKA and FB-TKA demonstrating ∼93% revision free survival at 23 years. Conclusions. Both FB- and MB-TKA demonstrated excellent survivorship, with no significant difference in all-cause revision rates or revision for aseptic loosening between implant designs

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgery performed for knee osteoarthritis. Despite this success up to 20% of patients are less than fully satisfied. Rotating platform (RP) bearings have demonstrated significant reduction in rates of wear in laboratory studies but thus far have failed to demonstrate a clinical difference compared to fixed bearing (FB) arthroplasty in patients. This may be due to studies limited by small sample size and single centre design. Additionally, no studies have utilised modern patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as PKIP to investigate differences between these bearings. A non-randomised, prospective, multi-centre study was conducted across centres in Australia, United Kingdom and the United States from November 2012 to May 2015. Knee prosthesis included were the RP and FB models of the PFC Sigma Knee (Depuy, Synthes) and the ATTUNE Knee (Depuy, Synthes). Data was collected on pre-arthroplasty interventions, demographics and PROMs. PROMs included were the KOOS, OKS, EQ53DL and PKIP. Participants were followed-up for 2 years. A total of 1,718 patients were recruited across 27 centres. 959 participants underwent a FB TKA, 759 participants underwent a RP TKA. No significant difference was found between RP and FB in change from baseline at 2 years across any parameter in all PROMs investigated at 2 years. Body Mass Index pre-operatively was the biggest indicator of change from baseline at 2 years. Our data demonstrates similar improvements in the short-term in both RP and TKA across all PROMs. Patients reported similar scores in satisfaction, confidence, mobility and stability in the PKIP PROM for both RP and FB groups. We have not found any evidence to suggest that RP TKA is disadvantageous at 2 years, and this is reassuring for any surgeon looking to utilise this bearing type in practice. Our data does not demonstrate a clinical advantage in RP TKA over FB TKA at 2 years in any PROM

Total knee replacement (TKR) design aims to restore normal kinematics with emphasis on flexion range. The survivorship of a TKR is dependent on the kinematics in six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DoF). Stepping up, such as stair ascent is a kinematically demanding activity after TKR. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by 6-DoF in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared kneeling kinematics in three TKR designs. 68 participants were randomised to receive either cruciate retaining (CR-FB), rotating platform (CR-RP) or posterior stabilised (PS-FB) prostheses. Image quality was sufficient for 49 of these patients to be included in the final analysis following a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients completed a step-up task while being imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy. Femoral and tibial computer-aided design (CAD) models for each of the TKR designs were registered to the fluoroscopic images using bespoke software OrthoVis to generate six-degree-of-freedom kinematics. Differences in kinematics between designs were compared as a function of flexion. There were no differences in terminal extension between the groups. The CR-FB was further posterior and the CR-RP was more externally rotated at terminal extension compared to the other designs. Furthermore, the CR-FB designs was more posteriorly positioned at each flexion angle compared to both other designs. Additionally, the CR-RP design had more external femoral rotation throughout flexion when compared with both fixed bearing designs. However, there were no differences in total rotation for either step-up or down. Visually, it appears there was substantial variability between participants in each group, indicating unique patient-specific movement patterns. While use of a specific implant design does influence some kinematic parameters, the overall patterns are similar. Furthermore, there is high variability indicating patient-specific kinematic patterns. At a group level, none of these designs appear to provide markedly different step-up kinematic patterns. This is important for patient expectations following surgery. Future work should aim to better understand the unique patient variability

Aims. Retrospective review of a consecutive series of 1,168 total ankle replacements (TAR) performed at Wrightington, to analyse modes of failure and clinical outcomes following TAR failure. Methods. All patients undergoing TAR between November 1993 – June 2019 were collated (4–25 year follow-up; mean 13.7 years). 6 implants were used (300 STAR, 100 Buechal Pappas, 509 Mobility, 118 Zenith, 41 Salto and 100 Infinity). 5 surgeons, all trained in TAR, performed the surgery. Modes of failure were collated and clinical and radiological outcomes recorded for the revisional surgery following failure of the TAR. Results. 156 (13.4%) TARs failed (47STAR 15.6%, 16BP 16%, 77Mobility 15.1%, 6Salto 14.6%, 10Zenith 8.5% and 0Infinity 0%). Mean time to failure 5.8 years (0.1- 21.4 years). The 4 most common modes of failure were 44.9% aseptic loosening, 11.5% gutter pain, 10.9% infection and 10.3% recurrent edge loading. 50 underwent conversion to tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion with nail with 9 (18%) failing to fuse. 31 underwent revision TAR with 2 (6.5%) subsequently failed. 22 underwent ankle fusion with 10 (45%) failing to fuse. 21 underwent polyethylene exchange of which 8 (38%) had further poly failure. 20 (12.8%) were managed conservatively, 2 (1.3%) required below knee amputation and 6 were listed but lost to follow-up. 81 of the 1168 (7%) consecutive cohort were lost to follow-up. Conclusions. 13.4% of the TAR cohort have failed at average follow-up 13.7 years. There was no difference in failure modes across the implant designs. Whilst the fixed bearing has the shortest follow-up, it may be performing better as there have been no failures so far. Prior to October 2016, most revisions were to fusion (TTC 18% failure rate, ankle 45% failure rate), whereas post 2016, 57% patients elected for revision TAR (6.5% failure)

Introduction. In total knee arthroplasty, the alignment of leg depends on the alignment of the component. In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, it is determined by the thickness of the implant relative to the bone excised mostly. After initial scepticism, UKA is increasingly accepted as a reliable procedure for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis with the improvements in implant design, surgical technique and appropriate patient selection. Recently, computer assisted UKA is helpful in accuracy and less invasive procedure. But, fixed bearing or mobile bearing in UKA is still controversy. We compared the early clinical and radiological results of robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a fixed bearing design versus a mobile type bearing design. Materials and Methods. A data set of 50 cases of isolated compartmental degenerative disease that underwent robot-assisted UKA using a fixed bearing design were compared to a data set of 50 cases using a mobile bearing type design. The operations were performed by one-senior author with the same robot system. The clinical evaluations included the Knee Society Score (knee score, functional score) and postoperative complications. The radiological evaluations was assessed by 3-foot standing radiographs using the technique of Kennedy and White to determine the mechanical axis and femoro-tibial angle for knee alignment. Operative factors were evaluated including length of skin incision, operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and intraoperative complications. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, skin incision size, blood loss and hospital stay. (p > 0.05) There were no significant differences in Knee Society Scores at last follow up. An average preoperative femorotibial alignment was varus alignment of −1° in both groups. Postoperative patients with fixed-bearing implants had an average +2.1° valgus and the patients with mobile bearing implants had +5.4° valgus in femorotibial alignment, which was different.(p<0.05) There was one case of medial tibia plateau fracture in fixed bearing group in 3 months postoperatively. And there were one case of liner dislocation with unstable knee in 6 weeks postoperatively and one case of femoral component loosening in 1 year postoperatively in mobile bearing group. There was no intraoperative complication. The average preoperative knee score was 45.8, which improved to 89.5 in fixed bearing group and 46.5, which improved to 91.2 in mobile bearing group at last followup. The average preoperative function score was 62.4 which improved to 86.5 in fixed bearing group and 60.7 which improved to 88.2 in mobile bearing group at last followup. Conclusion. In ourearly experience, two types of bearing of robot-assisted UKA groups showed no statistical differences in clinical assessment but there was statistical difference in postoperative radiological corrected alignment. But in aspect of early complications, we think that mobile bearing seems to be requiring more attention in surgery

Background. Alignment and soft tissue (ligament) balance are two variables that are under the control of a surgeon during replacement arthroplasty of the knee. Mobile bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacements have traditionally advocated sizing the prosthesis based on soft tissue balance while accepting the natural alignment of the knee, while fixed bearing prosthesis have tended to correct alignment to a pre planned value, while meticulously avoiding overcorrection. The dynamic loading parameters like peak adduction moment (PKAM) and angular adduction Impulse (Add Imp) have been studied extensively as proxies for medial compartment loading. In this investigation we tried to answer the question whether correcting static alignment, which is the only alignment variable under the control of the surgeon actually translates into improvement in dynamic loading during gait. We investigated the effect of correction of static alignment parameter Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle and dynamic alignment parameter in coronal plane, Mean Adduction angle (MAA) on 1st Peak Knee Adduction Moment (PKAM) and Angular Adduction Impulse (Add Imp) following medial unicompartmental knee replacements. Methods. Twenty four knees (20 patients) underwent instrumented gait analysis (BTS Milan, 12 cameras and single Kistler force platform measuring at 100 Hz) before and after medial uni compartmental knee replacement. The alignment was measured using long leg alignment views, to assess Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle. Coronal plane kinetics namely 1st Peak Knee Adduction Moment (PKAM) and angular adduction impulse (Add Imp)- which is the moment time integral of the adduction moment curve were calculated to assess medial compartment loading. Single and multiple regression analyses were done to assess the effect of static alignment parameters (HKA angle) and dynamic coronal plane alignment parameters (Mean Adduction Angle – MAA) on PKAM and Add Imp. Results. 12 knees had mobile bearing prosthesis implanted while the other 12 had fixed bearing prosthesis. The mean correction for HKA angle was 2.78 degrees (SD ± 1.32 degrees). There was no significant difference in correction of alignment (HKA) between mobile bearing and fixed bearing groups. MAA and HKA angles were significant predictors of dynamic loading parameters, PKAM and Add Imp (p<0.05). Correction of HKA angle was found to be a better predictor of dynamic loading. We assessed the percentage improvement in loading (%ΔPKAM & %ΔAdd. Imp) and its relationship to correction of HKA (Δ HKA) angle Correction of alignment in the form of HKA (Δ HKA) angle was found to be a very strong predictor of improvement of loads (R = 0.90 for %ΔAdd. Imp and R = 0.50 for %Δ PKAM). Conclusion. Correction of alignment (HKA Angle) predicts improvement in loads through medial compartment of knee. One degree correction resulted in 7% improvement of load through the medial unicompartmental knee replacement

Purpose. The aim of the present study was to look at survivorship and patient satisfaction of a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with an all-polyethylene tibial component. Materials and Methods. We report the survivorship of 91 fixed bearing unicompartmental arthroplasties with all-polyethylene tibial components (Preservation DePuy UK), which were used for medial compartment osteoarthritis in 79 patients between 2004 and 2007. The satisfaction level of patients who had not undergone revision of the implant was also recorded. For comparison, we reviewed 49 mobile bearing unicompartmental arthroplasties (Oxford UKA Biomet UK Ltd), which had been used in 44 patients between 1998 and 2007. Results. Mean length of follow up of patients with the fixed bearing implant was 44.7 months (range 24 - 74 months) and for the mobile bearing replacement, the mean follow up was 67.6 months (24 - 119). In the fixed bearing design, at maximum follow up period of 74 months, 8 implants (8.8%) had been revised (or were listed for revision) to total knee replacement and in the mobile bearing design over the maximum follow up period of 119 months there had been only one revision (2.0%). Patients who had not undergone revision were asked if they were satisfied with their knee following the unicompartmental arthroplasty. In the fixed bearing design, 83.5% said that they were satisfied with the outcome of the operation compared to 93.9% of the patients receiving the mobile bearing design. Conclusion. We conclude that there is a higher incidence of revision of this fixed bearing design using an all-polyethylene tibial component compared to the mobile bearing design. We found that those patients who had not required revision had a lower rate of satisfaction with the fixed bearing compared to the mobile bearing design

Aim. To assess the survivorship of unicompartmental replacements (UKR) revised to UKR. Background: Partial revision of UKR, or revision to a further UKR is a rarely performed procedure with some data from the Australian registry suggesting that results are not good, with early revision being required. Method. All revision procedures from initial UKR are prospectively followed and scored as part of our department's knee database. We analysed the 37 cases in our database that showed revision of UKR to UKR. These included cases in the following categories: a) Mobile bearing revised to mobile bearing (n=8) b) Mobile bearing revised to fixed bearing (n=20) c) Fixed bearing revised to fixed bearing (n=9). Results. The survivorship of revisions of mobile UKR to mobile UKR was 87.5% at a mean of 5 yrs. The survivorship of revisions from mobile UKR to fixed bearing UKR was 95% at a mean of 8 yrs. The survivorship of revisions from fixed bearing UKR to fixed bearing UKR was 78% at 15 yr (1 revised at 9yrs, 1 at 12 yrs). Conclusion. Despite the perception that revision of a UKR to another UKR is likely to fail and require early revision, our results suggest that in specific circumstances acceptable survivorship and outcome are possible. MULTIPLE DISCLOSURES

Prosthetic Hip dislocations remain one of the most common major complications after total hip arthroplasty procedures, which has led to much debate and refinement geared to the optimization of implant and bearing options, surgical approaches, and technique. The implementation of larger femoral heads has afforded patients a larger excursion distance and primary arc range motion before impingement, leading to lowered risk of hip dislocation. However, studies suggest that while the above remains true, the use of larger heads may contribute to increased volumetric wear, trunnion related corrosion, and an overall higher prevalence of loosening, pain, and patient dissatisfaction, which may require revision hip arthroplasty. More novel designs such as the dual mobility hip have been introduced into the United States to optimize stability and range of motion, while possibly lowering the frictional torque and modes of failure associated with larger fixed bearing articulations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the effect of bearing design and anatomic angles on frictional torque using a clinically relevant model8. Two bearing designs at various anatomical angles were used; a fixed and a mobile acetabular component at anatomical angles of 0°,20°,35°,50°, and 65°. The fixed design consisted of a 28/56mm inner diameter/outer diameter acetabular hip insert that articulated against a 28mm CoCr femoral head (n=6). The mobile design consisted of a 28mm CoCr femoral head into a 28/56mm inner diameter/outer diameter polyethylene insert that articulates against a 48mm metal shell (n=6). The study was conducted dynamically following a physiologically relevant frictional model8. A statistical difference was found only between the anatomical angles comparison of 0vs65 degrees in the mobile bearing design. In the fixed bearing design, a statistical difference was found between the anatomical angles comparison of 20vs35 degrees, 20vs50 degrees, and 35vs65 degrees. No anatomical angle effect on frictional torque between each respective angle or bearing design was identified. Frictional torque was found to decrease as a function of anatomical angle for the fixed bearing design (R2=0.7347), while no difference on frictional torque as a function of anatomical angle was identified for the mobile bearing design. (R2=0.0095). These results indicate that frictional torque for a 28mm femoral head is not affected by either anatomical angle or bearing design. This data suggests that mobile design, while similar to the 28mm fixed bearing, may provide lower frictional torque when compared to larger fixed bearings >or= 32mm8. Previous work by some of the authors [8] show that frictional torque increases as a function of femoral head size. Therefore, this option may afford surgeons the ability to achieve optimal hip range of motion and stability, while avoiding the reported complications associated with using larger fixed bearing heads8. It is important to understand that frictional behavior in hip bearings may be highly sensitive to many factors such as bearing clearance, polyethylene thickness/stiffness, polyethylene thickness/design, and host related factors, which may outweigh the effect of bearing design or cup abduction angle. These factors were not considered in this study

Introduction:. Backside wear has been previously reported through in-vitro and in-vivo to have a significant contribution to the total wear in rotating bearing TKRs. The present study investigated the contribution of backside wear to the total wear in the PFC Sigma rotating platform mobile bearing TKR. In addition, the wear results were compared to the computed wear rates of the PFC Sigma fixed bearing TKR, with two different bearing materials. Materials and Methods:. The commercially available PFC Sigma rotating platform mobile bearing and PFC Sigma fixed bearing total knee replacements, size 3 (DePuy, UK) were tested, with either conventional or moderately cross-linked (5 MRad) GUR1020 UHMWPE bearing materials. The computational wear model for the knee implants was based on the contact area and an independent experimentally determined non-dimensional wear coefficient [1,2,3]. The experimental wear test for the mobile bearing was force controlled using the ISO anterior-posterior force (ISO14243-1-2009). However, due to time limitation of the explicit simulation required to run the force controlled model, the simulation was run using the AP displacements taken from the experimental knee simulator which was run under the ISO AP force. The Sigma fixed bearing TKR was run under high level of anterior-posterior displacements (maximum of 10 mm). Results and Discussion:. The rotating platform bearing showed lower wear rates, compared to that of the PFC Sigma fixed bearing, for both conventional and moderately cross-linked UHMWPE bearing materials (Fig. 1). Moreover, the results showed a high contribution of backside wear to the total wear, approximately 1 mm. 3. /million cycles (∼30% of the total wear). The computational wear predictions were in good agreements with the clinical and experimental measurements [4,5]. Contrasting the effect of bearing material on wear prediction, introducing the moderately cross-linked UHMWPE as a bearing material reduced the predicted wear rates by approximately 1 mm. 3. /million cycles in rotating platform bearing, compared to more than 5 mm. 3. /million cycles in PFC fixed bearing TKR. This reduced effect of cross-linking on wear in mobile bearing was mainly attributed to the lower cross-shear ratios in these bearings, compared to fixed bearings, and the less dependency of wear in moderately cross-linked UHMWPE on the degree of cross-shear, compared to conventional UHMWPE. Decreasing the degree of cross-shear from higher values (Sigma curved insert, high kinematic) to lower ones (rotating platform bearing) changed the predicted wear rates from 8.7 to 3.3 and from 3.4 to 2.4 (mm. 3. /million cycles), for conventional and moderately cross-linked UHMWPE materials respectively (Fig. 2). Conclusion:. The modelling confirmed the previous experimental observations of very low wear with the rotating platform knee. The models also determined the level of wear from the backside of the rotating platform knee which was approximately 1 mm. 3. /million cycles. The fixed bearing knee with moderately cross linked polyethylene also showed low wear at approximately 3 mm. 3. /million cycles. These low wear rates were determined under high kinematic walking cycles conditions. Future work will consider additional conditions

Purpose: The results of medial unicompartmental knee replacement have been reported as excellent over the intermediate term with both fixed and mobile bearing designs. However not all publications report equal success, with different outcomes also reported between mobile and fixed bearing designs. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of mobile and fixed bearing medial unicompartmental arthroplasties. Method: We evaluated the results of 230 consecutive medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) designs performed between 1989 and 2006 at a single academic centre (London Health Sciences Centre). Eighty mobile bearing UKA (63 patients, mean follow up3.2 years) and 160 fixed bearing UKA (117 patients, mean follow up 6.2 years) were reviewed. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 66 years. Forty nine patients died at a mean of 12.7 years after the index arthroplasty. Patients were evaluated clinically using the Knee Society, WOMAC and SF12 outcome scores and radiographically using the Knee Society rating system. Results: In the fixed bearing group 21 knees underwent revision at a mean of 6.9 years after the index procedure. In the mobile bearing group 7 knees underwent revision at a mean of 2.6 years. The mean Knee Society knee and function scores for the patients who had not had a revision improved in both groups, with the fixed bearing group mean function and Knee Society Scores improving from 53 and 48 points preoperatively to 80 and 93 points at the time of the most recent evaluation. In the mobile bearing group the mean function and Knee Society Scores improved from 55 and 44 points preoperatively to 85 and 91 points at the time of the most recent evaluation. The five year cumulative survival rates were 96% (SE +/− 0.18) and 89% (SE +/− 0.46) for the fixed and mobile bearing designs respectively, with ten year cumulative survival rates of 85% (SE +/− 0.35) in the fixed bearing group using an endpoint of revision to tricompartmental knee arthroplasty. Conclusion: Both bearing designs of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provided excellent pain relief and restoration of function in carefully selected patients and demonstrated durable implant survival over the midterm. In this study the fixed bearing designs demonstrated improved survivorship over the mobile bearing designs at 5 years. This may be related to the learning curve of the different bearing systems

Purpose: High contact stresses and wear after total knee replacement (TKR) has been a problem. Mobile bearing TKRs have been advocated as a means to increase load bearing area, reduce contact stresses and minimize wear. The purpose of this study was to compare two, large, consecutive cohorts of TKR patients with greater than 10 years follow-up, one with a fixed bearing and one with a mobile bearing design. Method: One hundred and three SAL II mobile bearing TKR’s were compared to a gender, age, BMI and time from surgery matched fixed bearing Genesis II cohort of equal size. All surgeries were performed between September 1993 and December 2000 (average follow-up, 11.64±1.64 years). Inclusion criteria included patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Exclusion criteria included revision arthroplasty, inflammatory arthritis, a prior osteotomy or a prior patellectomy. The > 10 year Kaplan-Meier survivorship, health-related outcomes (Knee Society scores, WOMAC and SF-12), radiographs and retrieved implants for the fixed and mobile bearing TKR cohorts were compared. Results: Fixed bearing TKRs demonstrated better 10 year Kaplan-Meier survivorships for any re-operation, 1.000±0.000 compared to 0.969±0.018 for mobile bearings (Genesis II and SAL I/II respectively). Revision rates were significantly different between groups with fixed bearing having no revisions and mobile four revisions (3.9%). No cases were revised for sepsis. Mobile bearing revisions were for pain (1), patellar maltracking (1), polyethylene wear (1) and aseptic loosening (1). At 10 years, health-related outcomes were similar between the two cohorts. Fixed bearing TKRs demonstrated more range of motion (111.42±12.76 vs 107.19±14.74 degrees) although not significant (p=0.052). Wear was more frequently noted in mobile bearing TKRs on > 10 year radiographs. Conclusion: In this comparison of two contemporary TKRs, the fixed bearing TKR outperformed the mobile bearing TKR

Although good long term results for fixed bearing uni-compartmental knee replacements (UKRs) have been reported mobile bearings predominate in some parts of the world. Three prospective studies have been undertaken comparing the short and medium term outcomes of fixed and mobile UKRs. A 5 year comparative cohort study of 47 Oxford mobile bearing and 57 St Georg Sled fixed bearing UKRs. A 2 year study of 50 fixed and 50 mobile bearing AMC Uniglide UKRs.(The implant system allows implantation of either a fixed or mobile tibial component with the same femoral component.). The 1 year results of a randomised controlled trial of 38 fixed and 33 mobile AMC Uniglide UKRs in patients under 70. In all groups the preoperative sex mix, average age and knee scores were extremely similar. All patients were assessed both pre and postoperatively by a research nurse and radiographs were taken; the results were entered on the Bristol Knee database. Results:. Multiple problems were encountered, perhaps because of the introduction of MIS, but at 5 years 11 Oxford and 4 Sleds had failed. The major problem with the mobile bearing implant was instability though tibial fractures were also seen. Both groups had three cases of arthritic progression and loose cement was seen twice in the fixed bearing group. – Amongst the remaining patients the median scores for the Sled were better. Bristol Knee Score (Max 100) 95:90; Oxford (Max 48) 39:37; and reduced WOMAC (Best score 12) 18:24. 2 bearing exchanges and 3 revisions were needed in the mobile group with none in the fixed group. Again all scores were better for the fixed group. American Knee Score (AKS) (Max 200) 195:185; Oxford (Max48) 39:37; and reduced WOMAC (Max 12) 19:20. One fixed bearing implant had been revised but none in the mobile group, however 3 randomised to receive a mobile bearing had a fixed bearing inserted because the surgeon was unhappy about bearing stability; all three are doing well. All knee scores at one year show the fixed bearing implant to be performing better. AKS (Max 200) 194:173; Oxford (Max48) 39:33; and WOMAC(Max) 12 18:22. Conclusion. Although theoretically mobile bearings will give greater longevity there is frequently a short term price to pay particularly when the procedures are performed by inexperienced surgeons and trainees. Since the wear properties of polyethylene have improved in recent years these studies suggest that a fixed bearing option can be used more safely in many patients

Background: In the UK 80% unicompartmental knee replacements(UKRs) and 10% of total knee replacements(TKRs) use mobile bearings. It is suggested that mobile bearings are more physiological and wear less, however it is still unclear whether patients tolerate mobile bearing knee replacements as well. Patients and methods: We report four prospective studies,. Two compared fixed with mobile bearings in TKR and two in UKR. The prostheses involved were fixed and mobile variants of the Rotaglide (TKR), Kinemax (TKR) and Uniglide (UKR). In addition the Oxford and St. George Sled UKRs were compared. All except the Uniglide study were randomized prospective trials (RCTs). 611 patients were involved with a mean age of 68 years. Residual pain following surgery was assessed with either the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) or the WOMAC score. The patients were followed up at one and two years postoperatively by a Research nurse and the findings recorded prospectively on the Bristol Knee database. Results:. Study 1:. Rotaglide. Prospective RCT. 171 patients. Mean pain score (OKS) Fixed bearing 15.4 v Mobile bearing 13.2. P= 0.012. Fixed bearing prosthesis caused significantly less pain. Study 2:. Kinemax. Prospective RCT. 198 patients. Mean pain score (WOMAC) Fixed bearing 8.9 v Mobile bearing 8.3. P = 0.443. Trend favouring fixed bearing. Study 3:. Uniglide Non-randomised trial. 184 patients. Mean pain score (WOMAC) Fixed bearing 7.6 v Mobile bearing 10.1. P < 0.001. Fixed bearing caused significantly less pain. Study 4:. St. George Sled v Oxford. Prospective RCT. 94 patients. Mean pain score (OKS) 15.8 v 13.9 . P= 0.058. Strong trend suggesting the Sled caused less pain. Conclusion: Our data suggests that the fixed bearing knee replacements result in less residual pain than their mobile bearing counterparts, at least in the first two years following surgery

Introduction. Mobility at insert-tray articulations in mobile bearing knee implant accommodates lower cross-shear at polyethylene (PE) insert, which in turn reduces wear and delamination as well as decreasing constraint forces at implant-bone interfaces. Though, clinical studies disclosed damage due to wear has occurred at these mobile bearing articulations. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the effect of second articulations bearing mobility and surface friction at insert-tray interfaces to stress states at tibial post during deep flexion motion. Method & Analysis. Figure 1 shows the 3-D computational aided drawing model and finite element model of implant used in this study. LS-DYNA software was employed to develop the dynamic model. Four conditions of models were tested including fixed bearing, as well as models with coefficients of friction of 0.04, 0.10 and 0.15 at tibial-tray interfaces to represent healthy and with debris appearance. A pair of nonlinear springs was positioned both anteriorly and posteriorly to represent ligamentous constraint. The dynamic model was developed to perform position driven motion from 0° to 135° of flexion angle with 0°, 10° and 15° of tibial rotation. The prosthesis components were subjected with a deep squatting force. Results. Peak values of maximum shear stress for different coefficients of friction and fixed bearing, respectively, are shown in Figure 2. Peak value of maximum shear stress at tibial post of fixed bearing is significantly larger than mobile bearing with tibial rotation. The peak values are 63MPa and 46.7MPa with 10° and 15° tibial rotation respectively for fixed bearing while for mobile bearing the values range from 32MPa to 36.6MPa and from 35.3MPa to 40.6MPa with 10° and 15° tibial rotation respectively. It was found that peak value of maximum shear stress increases with coefficient of friction and tibial rotation. In contrast, with normal rotation, bearing mobility and surface friction do not give any significant effect on the shear stress at tibial post. Discussion & Conclusions. Appearance of second articulations in mobile bearing TKA provides an attribute in reducing force transmission via implant-bone interface which leads to lower shear stress induced in tibial post due to transmitted moment. However, higher surface friction will result in larger frictional force, which in turn induce larger moment at tibial post. Higher conformity will attribute to higher cross-shear level during knee motion. As a result, wear damage at tibiofemoral articular surface of mobile insert become worse

Introduction: Literature fails clearly to indicate an advantage of a mobile bearing over the fixed bearing implant. The purpose of this study is to compare result of mobile bearing verses fixed bearing Total Knee replacement done by single surgeon and to see if there is any advantage for the mobile bearing. Material and Methods: Eight hundred sixty two cases of a mobile bearing LPS Flex implant was compared to four hundred twenty six cases of fix bearing LPS implant done from January of 2001 to January 2006, both group was performed by the same surgeon and the same postoperative cause was done in both group. Documentation for complication and knee score were done in both groups and statistics and analyses were curried out for this result. Also three kinematics evaluation was curried on for ten patients of each group to asset the tibia femoral movement in both groups in deep flexions. Result: We had three Knee dislocations in the mobile bearing group none in the fixed bearing group the rest of the complication were similar in both group. Average range of motion was the same in both groups. Knee score was similar in both groups. Canamathic assessment confirmed in both group excessive exteneraltation of the femur over the tibia and in fixed bearing group it confirms the spelling of the lateral femoral condoral from the tibial Plato which wrist concern about the safety Fix bearing in deep flexion. Discussion and Conclusion: There was no clear advantage of Mobil bearing over fixed bearing implant, mobile bearing requires a better sophistical balance to reduce rate of Knee dislocation postoperatively. The mobile bearing knee seems to be more accommodating to deep flexion over Hundred & Fifty degrees and concern should be raised about the fixed bearing in deep flexion activity

Introduction. Previous fluoroscopy studies have been conducted on numerous primary-type TKA, but minimal in vivo data has been documented for subjects implanted with revision TKA. If a subject requires a revision TKA, most often the ligament structures at the knee are compromised and stability of the joint is of great concern. In this present study, subjects implanted with a fixed or mobile bearing TC3 TKA are analyzed to determine if either provides the patient with a significant kinematic advantage. Methods. Ten subjects are analyzed implanted with fixed bearing PFC TC3 TKA and 10 subjects with a mobile bearing PFC TC3 TKA. Each subject underwent a fluoroscopic analysis during four weight bearing activities: deep knee bend (DKB), chair rise, gait, and stair descent. Fluoroscopic images were taken in the sagittal plane at 10 degree increments for the DKB, 30 degree increments for chair rise, and at heel strike, toe off, 33% and 66% cycle gait and stair descent. Results. The average weight bearing maximum flexion for the fixed bearing TKA group was 104 degrees (SD = 18.2 degrees). The average medial and lateral anterior-posterior (AP) translation for these subjects from full extension to maximum weight-bearing flexion was −6.74 mm and −8.0 mm in the posterior direction, respectively. The average femorotibial axial rotation was 1.27 degrees from full extension to maximum flexion. The average medial and lateral AP translations respectively from full extension to maximum flexion are shown in Figures 1 and 2 and the corresponding average femorotibial axial rotation pattern is shown in Figure 3. Subjects implanted with a mobile bearing device are presently being analyzed. Discussion. The fixed bearing device, on average, does not allow for much axial rotation when compared to less constrained or mobile bearing TKA designs. Previous studies have mobile bearing rotating platform primary posterior stabilized devices have documented that the bearing does rotate with the femur. Therefore, it is assumed subjects having a mobile bearing TC3 TKA may achieve greater axial rotation. Subjects having the fixed bearing TC3 TKA did achieve posterior femoral rollback of both condyles, revealing that a fixed bearing revision TKA may act more like a hinged device

Introduction. Kneeling ability is better in unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty. There is also an impression that mobile bearing knees achieve better functional outcome than their fixed bearing cousins in unicompartmental and to a lesser extent total joint arthroplasty. In the UK, the market leading unicompartmental replacement is mobile bearing. Aim. To analyse kneeling ability after total and unicompartmental knee replacement using mobile and fixed bearing inserts. Methods. In our department there are two prospective randomised studies (fixed versus mobile) in this area. For total knee arthroplasty, 207 TKR patients receiving the same prosthesis (Rotaglide, Corin, UK) were randomised into mobile bearing (102 patients, mean age of 53 years) or fixed bearing (105 patients, mean age of 55 years). Regarding unicondylar knees, data was collected on 352 UKR patients who received the same implant (Uniglide - previously known as AMC - Corin, UK). Within this group there was a randomised controlled trial of fixed v mobile bearings: 52 patients (mean age 62 years) had a mobile insert and 57 (mean age 65 yrs) had a fixed insert. Data was also collected on patients undergoing fixed bearing lateral unicondylar replacement (Uniglide). All patients completed the Oxford Knee Questionnaire preoperatively, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, (where 0 = bad and 48 = good). There kneeling ability (question 7) and total Oxford scores were analysed. We are currently collecting objective data on post-operative kneeling ability with force plate analysis and subjective anterior knee-specific scoring systems. Results. Subjective kneeling ability: Oxford Knee Score Question 7 as range 0-4, where 4 = good. Conclusion. Both fixed and mobile UKR and TKR have good outcome. No group produced good kneeling ability, but there was a modest improvement in all groups from the preoperative kneeling scores. Fixed bearing knee replacement showed better outcome than mobile bearing knees, in both UKR and TKR groups

Introduction: There is an impression among Orthopaedic surgeons that mobile bearing knee replacement has a better functional outcome than fixed bearing knee replacement. Since kneeling demands a high level of function after knee replacement this study was undertaken to see if mobile bearings in either total or unicompartmental replacement conferred an advantage. Methods: A prospective randomised study of 207 TKR patients receiving the same prosthesis (Rotaglid, Corin, UK) was performed. Patients were randomised into a mobile bearing group (102 patients with a mean age of 53 years) and a fixed bearing group (105 patients with a mean age of 55 years). Data was also prospectively collected on 215 UKR patients who received the same unicompartmental implant (AMC, Uniglide, Corin, UK). 136 patients (Mean age: 62 yrs) had a mobile insert and 79 (mean age: 65 yrs) a fixed insert. All patients completed the Oxford Knee Questionnaire preoperatively as well as at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Their stated kneeling ability and total scores were analysed with a perfect score for kneeling ability being 4, and 48 the maximum total score. Results: In all groups both the kneeling ability and the total scores improved markedly from their preoperative state. At two years the total score for the fixed bearing devices was marginally better than for the mobile (Rotaglide 36;31 and Uniglide 37;33). There was a more striking difference with respect to kneeling ability with the fixed bearing variants performing better, (Rotaglide 1.4; 0.9 and Uniglide 1.9; 1.4), However, the greatest difference was between the UKR and TKR groups (UKR 1.7; TKR 1.2). Pre-operatively less than 2% of TKR patients (7% of the UKR patients) could kneel. Post-operatively, the patients’ kneeling ability improved with 21% for the mobile bearing, 32% of fixed bearing UKR patients. The TKR patients kneeling ability was 13% of the mobile, 26% of fixed bearing patients were able to kneel with little or no difficulty. In all groups the stated kneeling ability was poor with less than 50% of any group being able to kneel with ease or only minor difficulty. Conclusion: Those undergoing UKR appeared to perform better than those with a TKR. None of the forms of knee replacement used resulted in good kneeling ability, though this function was improved by arthroplasty in all groups. Mobile bearing inserts

Partial knee arthroplasty is making a resurgence as many patients and surgeons are realising that there are good options for preserving normally functioning knee tissues when facing end-stage knee OA without having to automatically proceed to TKA. What are potential advantages of this type of reasoning and could “less be more”? Limited comparative data exists comparing the functional results of partial and total knee replacement surgery. This study will report on patient satisfaction and residual symptoms following TKR, fixed bearing PKR, and mobile bearing PKR. What do the patients say when we aren't around?. TKA is not a benign treatment for isolated unicompartmental knee disease. A multicenter study examining 2,919 TKA's and UKA's found lower rates of overall complications at 11% for TKA's and 4.3% for UKA's. Significant variables for TKA included longer length of stay, more patients sent to an ECF, higher manipulation rate, higher readmission, ICU admission, and transfusion rates. Bolognesi, et al examining 68,790 TKA and UKA, reproduced these results with lower DVT/PE, deep infection rates and lower death rates. The 1 year and 5 year revision rates were higher for UKA's and have been hypothesised to be lower thresholds for revision of dissatisfied UKA vs a TKA with well-fixed implants. Functional improvements may be better for UKA vs TKA further substantiating the evidence that “less is more” for the surgical treatment of isolated compartmental disease of the knee. We conducted a multicenter independent survey of 1,263 patients (age 18–75) undergoing primary TKR and PKR for non-inflammatory knee DJD. We examined 13 specific questions regarding pain, satisfaction, and residual symptoms after knee arthroplasty. An independent third party (University of Wisconsin Survey Center) collected data with expertise in collecting healthcare data for state and federal agencies. Multivariate analysis was conducted, significance was set at p<0.05 and adequate power >0.8 was achieved. We controlled for gender, age, income, minority status, and surgical location in the multivariate analysis. Univariate analysis revealed PKR patients were more likely to be younger, male, and have an income greater than $25,000 than TKR patients. Multivariate analysis showed that mobile bearing PKR patients were 1.81 times more likely to report that their operative knee felt “normal” (p = 0.0109) and 2.69 more likely to report satisfaction with ability to perform activities of daily living than TKR recipients (p = 0.0058). Mobile bearing PKR patients were 44% less likely to report grinding/popping/clicking in the knee (p = 0.0142), 39% less likely to report knee swelling (p = 0.0351), and 40% less likely to report knee stiffness in the last 30 days (p = 0.0167) compared to TKR's. Fixed bearing PKR patients were 51% less likely to experience problems getting in and out of a car compared to TKR patients (p = 0.0129). Fixed bearing PKR's were 60% less likely to be satisfied with the degree of pain relief than TKR (p = 0.0113). The remaining questions revealed a trend for advantages in all categories for the MB-PKR compared to TKR but did not reach statistical significance. This study demonstrated that patient satisfaction is higher for MB-PKR than TKR with patients more likely reporting the knee to feel normal and that they were more able to perform activities of daily living. Fixed bearing devices were slightly more likely to report less pain relief than TKR. Mobile bearing partial knee replacement had fewer residual symptoms than fixed bearing PKR

Introduction: Uni-compartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) has now become an accepted and widely used treatment for uni-compartmental arthritis. Our unit has performed over 1000 UKRs in the past 22 years. The optimal mechanical design of the implant has yet to be determined. Method: A prospective trial was commenced in 1999 to compare the short-term results of a fixed bearing with a mobile bearing prosthesis. One hundred and three knees in 95 patients underwent a UKR. Fifty-three had a St Georg Sled fixed bearing prosthesis and 50 had unconstrained mobile bearing Oxford UKR. All were prospectively reviewed using the Oxford and Bristol Knee Scores. Results: Eighty-four knees have been reviewed at two years with one lost to follow-up. One fixed (2%) and six mobile (12%) bearing knees had been revised. Three fixed bearing and eight mobile bearing knees were dissatisfied because of stiffness or persistent pain and seven mobile bearing knees had undergone further minor procedures, usually for dislocation. At two years, the Bristol and Oxford knee scores for fixed bearing were better than the mobile bearing knees at 90:83 /100 and 38:33 /48 respectively. Conclusion: There were more early complications in the mobile bearing UKR group, but the functional results were slightly better than in the fixed bearing knees

Knee flexion is often decreased in severe arthritis causing pain, and functional limitations in lifestyles and occupations. Newer knee replacement designs offer the possibility of greater knee motion. The objective of our study was to compare the clinical outcomes, in particular the range of motion, in patients treated with a total knee arthroplasty using either a standard posterior stabilized knee prosthesis or a high flexion posterior stabilized knee prosthesis, with regard to return to function within 1 year of surgery. This was a prospective randomized single blinded study. Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either a standard fixed bearing posterior stabilized or a modified high flexion fixed bearing posterior stabilized Smith & Nephew Genesis II total knee joint replacement. Clinical outcomes were determined from data collected on all patients who were evaluated pre-operatively, at twelve weeks post-operatively, and at one year post-operatively. Data collected included SF-12, WOMAC, and Oxford knee scores, and knee range of motion measurements. 37 of 40 patients enrolled completed the study. 22 patients were randomized to receive a standard posterior stabilized fixed bearing Genesis II knee replacement and 22 were randomized to receive a Hi-Flex posterior stabilized fixed bearing knee replacement. ROM, quality of life, and clinical scores at 12 months will be presented

The aim of this prospective cohort study is to compare the early results in a single surgeon series of the mobile and fixed bearing versions of the Preservation UKR for lateral OA. Lateral UKRs were only considered for patients with isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis with a functioning anterior cruciate ligament. Mild patellofemoral osteoarthritis was not considered a contraindication. If there was any doubt over the condition of the medial compartment or patellofemoral joint, single photon emission computed tomography was performed. Significant uptake it the medial or patellofemoral joint was considered a contraindication. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively with the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and with anteroposterior, lateral and Rosenberg radiographs. Between 29. th. May 2001 and 15. th. May 2003, the senior author (GK) performed 233 consecutive Preservation UKRs. Of these, 30 were lateral UKRs (13%) performed in 12 men and 16 women (2 bilateral cases) with a mean age of 67 years (range 36 to 93 years). A metal-backed mobile bearing tibial component was used in 13 knees and an all-polyethylene fixed bearing tibial component in 17 knees. Patients in the mobile bearing group were significantly younger (t test; p< 0.0001) and had better AKSS knee (Mann-Whitney U test; p=0.05) and AKSS function scores (Mann-Whitney U test; p=0.005). The patients were reviewed after a minimum of 2 years (range 2 to 3.4 years). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. There had been 3 revisions in the mobile bearing group for tibial loosening and none in the fixed bearing group (chi squared test; not significant). There was 1 tibial periprosthetic fracture in the fixed bearing group. This study shows that the choice of bearing type makes little difference in clinical outcome or range of motion over the first 2 years when using the Preservation Knee. A similar good functional result was obtained with a fixed bearing despite the mobile bearing group being younger and having significantly better preoperative AKS knee and function scores. The 3 revisions for tibial loosening in the mobile bearing group are a concern. However, these results are short-term and there may be improved implant longevity in the long-term with mobile bearing tibial components due to reduced polyethylene wear

Fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee designs are both currently used in clinical practice with little evidence- based research available to determine superiority of one system. We performed a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial to compare a mobile bearing to two standard fixed bearing implants. A single observer was used to measure all range of motion scores. We evaluated the short and long- term outcomes of the SAL. ®. (mobile bearing) versus the AMK. ®. and Genesis II. ®. (fixed bearings) total knee joint replacements. Minimum two- year follow-up revealed no differences in the outcome measures (WOMAC, SF-12, Knee Society Clinical Rating System). The purpose of this study was to compare the results between a cruciate retaining mobile bearing total knee (SAL. ®. , Sulzer) and two cruciate retaining fixed bearing total knee prostheses (AMK. ®. , Depuy and Genesis II. ®. , Smith and Nephew). Ninety patients were randomized to receive a SAL, AMK, or GenesisII prostheses. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively, at three, twelve months and annually thereafter. Patient demographics, radiographs, and multiple outcome measures (WOMAC, SF-12 and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System) were evaluated. No patients were lost to follow-up. One patient was withdrawn due to dementia before three months, one patient died prior to the two year follow up, and one patient was revised for infection at 6 months leaving eighty-seven patients at an average follow-up of 3.37 years (range 2.91 – 4.44 years). There were no significant differences in any outcome measures or radiographic findings. There were no differences in KSCRS at two years (SAL - 167, AMK – 158, GenesisII – 166). There were no differences in knee flexion at two years (SAL – 117. °. , AMK – 115. °. , GenesisII – 118. °. ). No differences in multiple outcome measures were seen between a cruciate retaining mobile bearing and two cruciate retaining fixed bearing total knee prostheses. In this prospective randomized clinical trial no differences could be seen between a mobile bearing and two fixed bearing designs at a minimum of two years follow-up. Long-term evaluation will be required to comment on differences in polyethylene wear and implant longevity. Funding: London Health Sciences Centre Internal Research Fund

Fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee designs are both currently used in clinical practice with little evidence- based research available to determine superiority of one system. We performed a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial to compare a mobile bearing to two standard fixed bearing implants. A single observer was used to measure all range of motion scores. We evaluated the short and long- term outcomes of the SAL. ®. (mobile bearing) versus the AMK. ®. and Genesis II. ®. (fixed bearings) total knee joint replacements. Minimum two- year follow-up revealed no differences in the outcome measures (WOMAC, SF-12, Knee Society Clinical Rating System). The purpose of this study was to compare the results between a cruciate retaining mobile bearing total knee (SAL. ®. , Sulzer) and two cruciate retaining fixed bearing total knee prostheses (AMK. ®. , Depuy and Genesis II. ®. , Smith and Nephew). Ninety patients were randomized to receive a SAL, AMK, or GenesisII prostheses. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively, at three, twelve months and annually thereafter. Patient demographics, radiographs, and multiple outcome measures (WOMAC, SF-12 and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System) were evaluated. No patients were lost to follow-up. One patient was withdrawn due to dementia before three months, one patient died prior to the two year follow up, and one patient was revised for infection at 6 months leaving eighty-seven patients at an average follow-up of 3.37 years (range 2.91 – 4.44 years). There were no significant differences in any outcome measures or radiographic findings. There were no differences in KSCRS at two years (SAL - 167, AMK – 158, GenesisII – 166). There were no differences in knee flexion at two years (SAL – 117. °. , AMK – 115. °. , GenesisII – 118. °. ). No differences in multiple outcome measures were seen between a cruciate retaining mobile bearing and two cruciate retaining fixed bearing total knee prostheses. In this prospective randomized clinical trial no differences could be seen between a mobile bearing and two fixed bearing designs at a minimum of two years follow-up. Long-term evaluation will be required to comment on differences in polyethylene wear and implant longevity. Funding: London Health Sciences Centre Internal Research Fund

Introduction: There is an impression among Orthopaedic surgeons that mobile bearing knee replacement has a better functional outcome than fixed bearing knee replacement. Since kneeling demands a high level of function after knee replacement this study was undertaken to see if mobile bearings in either total or unicompartmental replacement conferred an advantage. Methods: A prospective randomised study of 207 TKR patients receiving the same prosthesis (Rotaglid , Corin, UK) was performed. Patients were randomised into a mobile bearing group (102 patients with a mean age of 53 years) and a fixed bearing group (105 patients with a mean age of 55 years). Data was also prospectively collected on 215 UKR patients who received the same Unicompartmental implant (AMC, Uniglide, Corin, UK). One hundred and thirty six patients (Mean age: 62 yrs) had a mobile insert and 79 (mean age: 65 yrs) a fixed insert. All patients completed the Oxford Knee Questionnaire preoperatively as well as at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Their stated kneeling ability and total scores were analysed with a perfect score for kneeling ability being 4 and 48 the maximum total score. Results: In all groups both the kneeling ability and the total scores improved markedly from their preoperative state. At two years the total score for the fixed bearing devices was marginally better than for the mobile (Rotaglide 36;31 and Uniglide 37;33). There was a more striking difference with respect to kneeling ability with the fixed- bearing variants performing better, (Rotaglide 1.4; 0.9 and Uniglide 1.9; 1.4), However, the greatest difference was between the UKR and TKR groups (UKR 1.7; TKR 1.2). Pre-operatively less than 2% of TKR patients (7% of the UKR patients) could kneel. Post-operatively, the patients’ kneeling ability improved with 21% for the mobile bearing, 32% of fixed bearing UKR patients. The TKR patients kneeling ability was 13% of the mobile, 26% of fixed bearing patients were able to kneel with little or no difficulty. In all groups the stated kneeling ability was poor with less than 50% of any group being able to kneel with ease or only minor difficulty. Conclusion: Those undergoing UKR appeared to perform better than those with a TKR. None of the forms of knee replacement used resulted in good kneeling ability, though this function was improved by arthroplasty in all groups. Mobile bearing inserts did not confer any advantage with respect to kneeling and in fact performed worse with regard to this particular knee function

Background: Although many knee surgeons routinely perform unicompartmental replacement (UKR) for medial compartment arthrosis there is still reluctance to perform lateral UKR’s as they are generally thought to be less satisfactory. The purpose of the present study was to prospectively compare the outcome of lateral UKR’s with medial UKR’s using the AMC Uniglide knee implant. Methods: Between 2002 and 2005, 29 lateral fixed bearing AMC Uniglide UKR’s were performed at our unit. American Knee Society (AKS), Oxford and WOMAC scores were recorded pre-operatively and at two years post-op and compared with the results of 50 medial mobile bearing and 50 medial fixed bearing AMC Uni-glide UKR’s performed during the same time period. Data was acquired by a research nurse and recorded prospectively on the Bristol Knee Database. The mean ages of the patients were: 63 years in the lateral UKR group was, 62 years in the medial mobile bearing group and 69 in the medial fixed bearing group. The groups were equally sex matched with a predominate number of females in each group. There was no difference between the pre-operative scores for the 3 groups. Results: At one-year review, the 3 groups had similar mean scores: (table removed). Conclusions: This study suggests that at two years the quality of outcome of Lateral UKR’s is at least equivalent to both fixed and mobile bearing medial compartment UKR’s. However, continued long-term survivorship studies are needed to assess failure rates of Lateral fixed bearing UKR’s and particularly to evaluate progression of arthritis in the medial compartment. The procedure should form part of the knee surgeons’ armamentarium, but the differences in the operative techniques for lateral and medial UKR must be appreciated

Aim: This study aims to establish whether or not mobile bearing TKR delivers the often stated benefits improved function and range of motion when compared to its fixed bearing equivalent. Methods and Results: A total of 357 patients undergoing TKR were randomly allocated to receive either a Mobile Bearing (181 knees) or a Fixed Bearing (176 knees) PSTKR. Further subrandomisation into patella resurfacing or retention was performed for both designs. All knees were scored using standard tools (Oxford, AKSS and SF12) preoperatively and at intervals postoperatively by independent observers. The range of motion increased from an average of 96 deg. (pre-op) to an average of 109 deg. at 1 year post-op for both the fixed and mobile bearing design. The management of the patella had no effect in either group. The knee society and knee function scores increased equally for both the fixed bearing and mobile bearing knees with no differences noted. Conclusion: There were no measurable differences in range of motion and clinical outcome scores at 1 year post-op for a mobile bearing design over its fixed bearing equivalent. It is likely that any potential advantages of a mobile bearing design will manifest in longevity rather than function

Introduction. Special high-flexion prosthetic designs show a small increase in postoperative flexion compared to standard designs and some papers show increased anterior knee pain with these prosthesis. However, no randomised controlled trails have been published which investigate difference in postoperative complaints of anterior knee pain. To assess difference in passive and active postoperative flexion and anterior knee pain we performed a randomized clinical trial including the two extremes of knee arthroplasty designs, being a high flex posterior stabilized rotating platform prosthesis versus a traditional cruciate retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. We hypothesised that the HF-PS design would allow more flexion, due to increased femoral rollback with less anterior knee pain than the CR design. We specifically assessed the following hypotheses:. Patients have increased flexion after HF-PS TKA compared to CR TKA, both passive and active. Patients show an increased femoral rollback in the HF-PS TKA as compared to the CR TKA. Patients receiving a HF-PS TKA design report reduced anterior knee pain relative to those receiving the CR TKA. Methods. In total 47 patients were randomly allocated to a standard cruciate retaining fixed bearing design (CR) in 23 patients and to a high-flexion posterior stabilized mobile bearing design (HF-PS) in 24 patients. Preoperative and one year postoperative we investigated active and passive maximal flexion. Furthermore, we used the VAS pain score at rest and during exercise and the Feller score to investigate anterior knee pain. A lateral roentgen photograph was used to measure femoral rollback during maximal flexion. Results. The HF-PS did show a significantly higher passive postoperative flexion; 120.8° (SD 10.3°) vs. 112.0° (SD 9.5°) for the CR group (p=0.004). The active postoperative flexion, VAS-pain score and Feller score did not show significant differences between both groups. Sub analysis with the HF-PS group showed a higher VAS-pain for the patients achieving ≥130° of flexion; 30.5 (SD 32.2) vs. 12.2 (SD 12.5) (p=0.16). The rollback was significantly lower in the CR group compared to the HF-PS group; 4.4 (SD 3.0) vs. 8.4 (SD 2.1). Conclusion. The present study showed a significant higher passive flexion in the Posterior Stabilised-High Flexion mobile bearing compared to a Cruciate Retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. However, this difference disappeared when comparing active flexion. The difference in passive flexion was probably related to a significantly lower rollback causing impingement in the CR prosthesis. No difference in anterior knee pain was found between both groups. However, a suggestion is raised that achieving high-flexion might lead to more patellofemoral complaints/anterior knee pain

Background. Previous in vivo fluoroscopic studies have documented that subjects having a PS TKA experience a more posterior condylar contact position at full extension, a high incidence of reverse axial rotation and mid flexion instability. More recently, a PS TKA was designed with a Gradually Reducing Radius (Gradius) curved condylar geometry to offer patients greater mid flexion stability while reducing the incidence of reverse axial rotation and maintaining posterior condylar rollback. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with a Gradius curved condylar geometry to determine if these subjects experience an advantage over previously designed TKA. Methods. In vivo kinematics for 30 clinically successful patients all having a Gradius designed PS fixed bearing TKA with a symmetric tibia were assessed using mobile fluoroscopy. All of the subjects were scored to be clinically successful. In vivo kinematics were determined using a 3D-2D registration during three weight-bearing activities: deep-knee-bend (DKB), gait, and ramp down (RD). Flexion measurements were recorded using a digital goniometer while ground reaction forces were collected using a force plate as well. The subjects then assessed for range of motion, condyle translation and axial rotation and ground reaction forces. Results. During a DKB, subjects implanted a Gradius designed, PS fixed bearing TKA design exhibited an average of 3.35 mm of posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle and 2.73 mm of the medial condyle with an average axial rotation of 4.90° in the first 90° of flexion. The average max flexion was 111.4°. From full extension to maximum flexion, the average axial rotation was 4.73°, while the subjects experienced 5.34 and 1.97 mm on the lateral and medial condyle rollback, respectively. During mid flexion from 30 to 60 degrees of flexion, the subjects experienced 1.34° of axial rotation, −1.13 and −0.11 mm of lateral and medial condyle motion. Conclusions. Subjects in this study did experience good weight-bearing flexion and magnitudes of axial rotation and posterior femoral rollback similar to previous PS TKA designs. During mid flexion, subjects in this study did experience less mid flexion paradoxical sliding than other PS TKA, leading to greater mid flexion stability for the patients

Total knee arthroplasty has been demonstrated to provide durable results with excellent pain relief and improvement in function. Our institution has studied and published the longest follow-up of mobile bearing TKR, fixed bearing modular TKR, and unicompartmental replacement. Indeed these studies support the durability of the operation and the improvement in function and relief of pain. They, however, are not perfect. In tricompartmental replacement, up to 5 or 6% are revised for loosening and or wear and in unicompartmental replacement, up to 25% are revised for loosening. There are also one or two percent of cases revised for periprosthetic fracture and one or two percent for hematogenous infection. One must remember these cases were performed in patients of average age 71. When one looks at our results in more active patients with osteoarthritis who are less than 55, the results are less spectacular with 15% revised at 10 to 15 years for loosening. We all hope that better polyethylene and better tibial tray locking mechanisms (in fixed bearing modular designs) will improve these results, but to predict there will be no failures is a “leap of faith”. Long-term follow-up of cemented TKA in patients under 55 where monolithic tibial trays were utilised have demonstrated better results at 20 years (92.3%) survivorship versus those where modular tibial trays (68%) were utilised. Long-term studies of cementless total knee replacement, especially in younger patients are needed to see if this approach provides better results

Introduction: Mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been developed to theoretically provide better, more physiological function of the knee and produce less PE wear. The theoretical superiority of mobile bearing TKAs over fixed bearing devices has not yet been proven in clinical studies. The objective of the present study was to prospectively analyze clinical and functional outcomes of randomized fixed and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty patients by means of gait analysis, electromyography and established clinical scores. Methods: In a prospective, randomized, patient- and observer-blinded, clinical study, 33 patients (mean age 63 years) received a cruciate retaining Genesis II TKA for primary osteoarthritis. 16 patients received a mobile bearing and 17 patients a fixed bearing device. The day before surgery and 24 months postoperatively, established clinical (KSS, HSS, WOMAC, UCLA, VAS) and quality of life (SF-36) scores were used to compare both patient groups. Electromyography of standardized locations was measured with the MyoSystem 2000 and analyzed with Myoresearch software. Gait analysis was performed with a six camera motion analysis system and force platforms. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements between pre- and postoperative evaluation in gait analysis and electromyography, but gait analysis results as well electromyography did not show any difference between both groups at follow-up. Clinical and quality of life results significantly improved from pre- to postoperative evaluation, but only the Knee Society Score showed a significant superiority of the mobile bearing group (mean 159.0; SD 27.7; range, 105–196) over the fixed bearing group (mean 134.4; SD 41; range, 56–198) (p=0.0022). Conclusions: In the present study, no functional advantage of mobile bearing TKA over fixed bearing devices could be found, although the mobile bearing group had better clinical results. Thus, long-term clinical results and in-vivo wear analyses have to be followed, and more subtle functional analyses (e.g. fluoroscopy) have to be employed to finally judge over the theoretical advantage of mobile bearing TKAs

Physiological kinematics is very difficult to restore after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A new model of medial stabilized (MS) TKA prosthesis has a high spherical congruence of the internal compartment, which guarantees anteroposterior (AP) stability associated with a flat surface of the insert in the lateral compartment, that allows a greater AP translation of the external condyle during knee flexion. The aim of our study is to evaluate, by dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA), the knee in vivo kinematics after the implantation of a MS prosthesis during sit to stand and lunge movements. To describe the in vivo kinematics of the knee after MS Fixed Bearing TKA (GMK Sphere (TM) Medacta International AG, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) using Model Based dynamic RSA. A cohort of 18 patients (72.1 ± 7.4 years old) was evaluated by dynamic RSA 9 months after TKA. The kinematic evaluation was carried out using the dynamic RSA tool (BI-STAND DRX 2), developed at our Institute, during the execution of sit to stand and lunge movements. The kinematic data were processed using the Grood and Suntay decomposition and the Low Point method. The patients performed two motor tasks: a sit-to-stand and a lunge. Data were related to the flexion angle versus internal-external, varus-valgus rotations and antero-posterior translations of the femur with respect to the tibia. During the sit to stand, the kinematic analysis showed the presence of a medial pivot, with a significantly greater (p=0.0216) anterior translation of the lateral condyle (3.9 ± 0.8 mm) than the medial one (1.6 ± 0.8 mm) associated with a femoral internal rotation (4.5 ± 0.9 deg). During the lunge, in the flexion phase, the lateral condyle showed a larger posterior translation than the medial one (6.2 ± 0.8 mm vs 5.3 ± 0.8 mm) associated with a femoral external rotation (3.1 ± 0.9 deg). In the extension phase, there is a larger anterior translation of the lateral condyle than the medial one (5.8 ± 0.8 mm vs 4.6 ± 0.8 mm) associated with femoral internal rotation (6.2 ± 0.9 deg). Analysing individual kinematics, we also found a negative correlation between clinical scores and VV laxity during sit to stand (R= −0.61) and that the higher femoral extra-rotation, the poorer clinical scores (R= 0.65). The finding of outliers in the VV and IE rotations analysis highlights the importance of a correct soft tissue balancing in order to allow the prosthetic design to manifest its innovative features

Reduction of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) surface wear in total knee replacements (TKR) may delay the onset of osteolysis and loosening of components. This study examined the wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform (RP) mobile bearing TKR with two different bearing materials. Testing was completed on a Leeds ProSim six-station knee simulator under ‘high’ kinematics [. 1. ]. PFC Sigma fixed bearing and LCS RP mobile bearing knee designs were tested (DePuy). Non-crosslinked (non-irradiated (NI) or gas plasma (GP) sterilised) and moderately cross-linked (4.0 MRad gamma irradiation sterilisation under vacuum (GVF)) GUR1020 UHMWPE bearings were investigated for each TKR design. Components were tested in 25 % bovine serum solution for up to five million cycles (frequency = 1 Hz). Volumetric wear was determined from gravimetric measurements of the inserts. The 1020 GVF fixed bearings exhibited a wear rate of 16.4 ± 4 mm3 per million cycles (MC). This was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than wear of the same bearing material in the rotating platform mobile bearing TKR (10.85 ± 2.39 mm3/MC). Similarly, when uncross-linked 1020 UHMWPE was introduced as the bearing material, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in wear was observed between the fixed bearing (16 ± 7 mm3/MC) and the RP knee designs (5.85 ± 2.05 mm3/MC). The RP design decouples the motions between the femoral-insert and tray-insert articulating surfaces. This translates complex knee motions into more unidirectional motions at two interfaces, thus reducing wear under high kinematics compared with fixed bearing TKR. This significant reduction in wear was observed with uncross-linked and moderately cross-linked bearing materials. Design of TKR is an important factor that influences UHMWPE surface wear and may affect long-term success of knee replacements in highly active patients

Variation in soft tissue constraints influence the kinematics and wear of total knee replacements (TKRs). The aim of this study was to experimentally investigate the effect of variation in the soft tissue constraints on the output kinematics of a fixed bearing TKR with different insert geometries. The kinematics have been shown to affect the wear rate of TKRs; increased output displacements may result in an increased wear rate. The soft tissue constraints were simulated experimentally using virtual springs. A new generation six station electromechanical ProSim knee simulator was used with the ISO 14243–1:2009 standard force control inputs; axial force, flexion-extension (FE), tibial rotation (TR) torque and anterior-posterior (AP) force. This allowed the kinematics to vary due to the test conditions. The ISO standard spring tensions of 44N/mm and 0.36Nm/° and gaps of 2.5mm and 6° were used for the AP and TR springs respectively. Different combinations of the input profiles were run in order to test the effect of their absence. The spring gaps were varied between 0mm–3mm and 0°–6° and the tensions between 0N/mm–250N/mm and 0Nm/°–1Nm/° for the AP and TR respectively. Three tibial insert designs were tested; high conformity curved (CVD), partially lipped (PLI) and flat. DePuy PFC Sigma fixed bearing components were tested in 25% bovine serum (in 0.04% sodium azide) lubricant. For each test 100 cycles were recorded on each station and then averaged. The CVD insert was used for all tests, the PLI insert was also used to test the effect of spring tension. The TR and AP output displacement profiles were affected by the FE position along with the TR torque and AP force respectively. The absence of these inputs changed the shape of the output profiles significantly. The spring gaps affected the peak AP and TR displacements (6.4mm to 3.7mm and 8° to 5.8° for maximum and zero spring gaps respectively). The spring tensions had a higher effect on the peak AP than TR position due to the design of the CVD insert restricting the TR movement (8.3mm to 3.7mm and 8.8° to 7.4° for no springs and maximum tension respectively). The spring gaps and tensions affected the amplitudes of the output profiles not their shape. The lower conformity inserts had a higher peak TR position (23° for the flat and 8.1° for the CVD insert) which occurred earlier in the cycle. The flat insert resulted in more anterior displacement, potentially due to the high conformity on the anterior side of the CVD and PLI inserts. The spring tension test had an increased effect on the PLI than the CVD insert. The PLI insert resulted in a higher change in displacements due to the spring tensions (10.4mm to 3.5mm and 13.6° to 8.8°). Soft tissue constraints and insert design had a significant effect on the kinematic outputs. Spring tensions and gaps for experimental testing should be chosen to reflect those of a specific patient group

As allergic reactions to implant wear are gaining more attention [4], the incorporation of ceramic materials to device design appears to be a promising development. In particular, ceramic femoral components of total knee replacements have been designed to produce less wear under standard [1] and adverse [5] implant conditions. Whereas the wear reduction effect of ceramics is generally accepted for hip implants, the corresponding effect for knee implants is not proven. Ezzet et al. reported a wear reduction of 42% for standard wear conditions [2] and of 55% for adverse wear conditions [3] when compared to a geometrically identical CoCr femoral component. In contrast to these findings, an analysis of the EndoLab® database has indicated wear rates of ceramic knee implants that are comparable to traditional low wear material couplings (Figure 1), and are within the range of clinically established devices. The purpose of this study was to directly compare two TKR designs, one fixed bearing and one mobile bearing, each made of traditional CoCr to one made of alumina matrix composite (BIOLOX®delta, CeramTec, Germany) ceramic material. The BPK-S Rotating Platform System (Peter-Brehm, Germany; Figure 2) and the MULTIGEN PLUS fixed bearing (Lima, Italy) were knee simulator wear tested according to ISO 14243-1 (2002). A total of three specimens plus one loaded soak control for each group (four groups in total) was subjected to 5 million standard gait cycles. The anterior-posterior (AP) and internal-external rotational (IE) motion of the implants resulting from the external load application of this force controlled test was recorded continuously. Wear was determined gravimetrically. The surface appearance of contact areas was analyzed by light microscopy and particle analysis was performed according to ISO 18129. For the mobile bearing groups, a mean wear rate of 2.47 mg per million cycles (StdDev. 0.38) was determined for the CoCr implant and of 1.10 mg per million cycles (StdDev. 0.46) for the BIOLOX®deltaimplant (Figure 3). The total AP and IE motion of the two groups did not differ. However, motion during stance phase was considerably higher for the ceramic group, indicating reduced frictional resistance (data not shown). For the fixed bearing groups, a mean wear rate of 12.01 mg per million cycles (StdDev. 3.28) was determined for the CoCr implant and of 1.78 mg per million cycles (StdDev. 0.40) for the BIOLOX®delta implant. Based upon the EndoLab® experience the ceramic total knee replacements tested perform as good as the best performing metallic total knee replacements. However it can be concluded that for the two implant systems tested the wear rate is reduced by more than 50% by using ceramic on polyethylene articulation when compared to an identical cobald crome design

Objectives. Initial stability of tibial trays is crucial for long-term success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in both primary and revision settings. Rotating platform (RP) designs reduce torque transfer at the tibiofemoral interface. We asked if this reduced torque transfer in RP designs resulted in subsequently reduced micromotion at the cemented fixation interface between the prosthesis component and the adjacent bone. Methods. Composite tibias were implanted with fixed and RP primary and revision tibial trays and biomechanically tested under up to 2.5 kN of axial compression and 10° of external femoral component rotation. Relative micromotion between the implanted tibial tray and the neighbouring bone was quantified using high-precision digital image correlation techniques. Results. Rotational malalignment between femoral and tibial components generated 40% less overall tibial tray micromotion in RP designs than in standard fixed bearing tibial trays. RP trays reduced micromotion by up to 172 µm in axial compression and 84 µm in rotational malalignment models. Conclusions. Reduced torque transfer at the tibiofemoral interface in RP tibial trays reduces relative component micromotion and may aid long-term stability in cases of revision TKA or poor bone quality. Cite this article: Mr S. R. Small. Micromotion at the tibial plateau in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: fixed versus rotating platform designs. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:122–129. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000481

Introduction: Mobile bearing TKA systems have drawn great attention as an alternative solution for the limitations of fixed bearing designs. Recently rotating platform posterior stabilized (RP-PS) was developed to take advantage of the benefits originating from the design features of the traditional rotating platform mobile bearing system and the traditional posterior stabilized fixed bearing system with post and cam mechanism. Despite its theoretical advantages, the clinical outcomes of TKAs with RP-PS mobile bearing system remain to be determined. In theory, compared to fixed bearing systems, clinical performances of mobile bearing knees may be more sensitive to the rehabilitation status due to its relatively small constraint by the prostheses. Therefore, the clinical outcomes can be vary with the follow-up periods. This study was conducted to compare the longitudinal clinical outcomes of TKAs with a RP-PS mobile system and with a floating platform mobile bearing system. Methods: 163 TKAs with one of two mobile bearing systems (E.motion-FP and E.motion-PS: B.Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) were included in this study. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using a computer assisted navigation system (Orthopilot, B.Braun-Aesculap). Clinical outcomes evaluated at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months were compared between the 70 knees with E.motion-FP and the 93 knees with E.motion-PS. Radiographic measurements of limb alignment and implant positioning showed no significant differences between the two groups. Results: Compared to TKAs with the FP prosthesis, TKAs with the RP-PS prosthesis had greater maximum flexion (128.9 vs. 135.3, p = 0.001) and tended to be more satisfactory (satisfaction level: 3.4 vs. 3.1, p = 0.052). The other clinical outcome scales (AKS knee and function, PF, WOMAC, and SF-36) showed comparable results. No failures were found in both groups. Conclusion: We found that TKAs with the RP-PS mobile bearing system have greater maximum flexion and patient satisfaction than TKAs with the FP mobile bearing system. The long term benefits 2009

The long-term survival of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been well established; however, functional outcome remains inconsistent. More normal postoperative TKA kinematics have been shown to produce better knee function. Improved kinematics can be obtained by using implants with optimised surface geometry. Hence a TKA with an appropriate surface geometryis likely to provide superior long-term functional outcome. The Advance-Medial Pivot TKA (Wright Medical) is a fixed bearing prosthesis with a conforming medial compartment and a non-conforming (flat on flat) lateral compartment. This surface geometry is designed with the intention of replicating the normal knee motion of sliding or pivoting medially and rolling back laterally. Aim: To investigate the sagittal plane kinematics of Advanced Medial Pivot Knee and compare with those of “flat on flat” fixed bearing TKA and normal knees. 18 patients who had undergone primary TKA for osteoarthritis were recruited at an average of 18 months post operation. These patients performed flexion and extension exercises against gravity and a step up exercise. Video fluoroscopy of these activities was used to obtain the patellar tendon angle (PTA). This is a previously validated method for assessing sagittal plane kinematics of a knee joint. The kinematic profile of the Advance Medial Pivot Knee was compared to the profile of 14 normal knees and 30 flat on flat, fixed bearing TKA’s. The sagittal plane kinematics of the Advance TKA differed from the normal knees. However, similarly to normal knees, a linear relationship was observed between PTA and knee flexion angle throughout knee flexion range. The kinematics of the Medial Pivot Knee were similar to normal when the knee was in a highly flexed position. Functional plane kinematics of the Advance Medial Pivot TKA appear to meet the design criteria in that a linear relationship between PTA and flexion angle is maintained. Further work is required to establish if these improved sagittal plane kinematics translate into improved functional outcome

We prospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 101 patients with mobile bearing total knee replacement (TKR) and 72 patients with the fixed bearing cruciate retaining TKR. Patients were assessed for diagnoses, range of motion, pre- and post-operative Oxford knee scores and complications. In the mobile bearing group of 113 knees in 101 patients, 97 had minimum 10-year follow up. By ten years, 16 patients had died of unrelated causes. Mean Revised Oxford Knee score improved from 16 pre-operatively to 42 at last follow up. The mean range of flexion was 115 degrees (75 – 130). One patient dislocated the bearing and needed manipulation. One patient reported superficial infection which resolved with antibiotics. One patient had deep vein thrombosis and one had non-fatal pulmonary embolism. In the fixed bearing group, 89 TKR's were performed in 72 patients. The mean age was 71.9 years and the mean follow up was 12.1 (10–14.1) years. 19 patients died during this study period. The mean range of flexion was 111.2 (80–135) degrees of flexion at latest follow- up. There was an improvement in the mean Oxford knee score from 16.2 preoperatively, to 42.5 to date. One patient required revision surgery at 12 years for polyethylene wear. One patient developed deep infection 10 years after the primary procedure but declined revision surgery. At ten years no revisions were performed in either group. This series has highlighted excellent results with both fixed and mobile bearing CR knees with hundred percent survival at ten years

Introduction and Aims: Movements between the poly-ethylene insert and the metal tibial tray in modular fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to poor locking mechanism is said to occur. The resulting ‘backside wear’ is proposed to be one cause to osteolysis and subsequent loosening. The purpose of this study was to determine in vivo the magnitude of movements between the poly and the tibial tray in modular metal-backed fixed bearing TKA using RSA. Method: Four patients (six knees), mean age 70 years, operated with cemented NexGen modular fixed bearing TKA were studied 12 to 18 months after surgery. The tibial baseplates and the polyethylene liners were prepared for RSA with tantalum markers. The patients stood with the foot of the investigated leg fully weight bearing on a rotating platform. The platform (and thereby the knee) was subjected to an internal or external directed torque of 10 Nm. At the first RSA examination the patient resisted an internal directed torque, and at the second examination an external directed torque. Rotation of the polyethylene liner in relation to the base plate between these two examinations was recorded. Also the insert motion index (IMI) was determined. Results: In three knees there was no inducible rotation of the polyethylene (rotation less than 0.03 degrees, IMI less than 93um). In the other three knees, however, rotation varied between 0.16 and 0.64 degrees, and the IMI varied between 210um and 420um. Conclusion: This study shows that the fixed polyethylene liner in some knees can display rotatory motions in relation to the base plate. The magnitude of the motions is comparable to that found for implants extracted at revision or autopsy. Whether this is due to inferior locking mechanism, or gradual deformation of the part of the polyethylene in contact with the locking mechanism cannot be determined in this study

Introduction: Mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been developed to theoretically provide a better, more physiological function of the knee and produce less polyethylene (PE) wear. The theoretical superiority of mobile bearing TKA’s over fixed bearing devices has not yet been proven in clinical studies. The objective of the present study was to analyze in vivo the knee joint kinematics in the sagittal plane in a patient population that had received either a fixed or a mobile TKA in a prospective, randomized, patient- and observer-blinded, clinical study. Methods: 31 patients were evaluated by means of fluoroscopy during unloaded flexion and extension against gravity, as well as during step-up and step-down with full weight bearing. In these 31 patients, 22 fixed bearing TKAs, 16 mobile-bearing TKAs and 19 natural knee joints were included. All patients had been operated in a prospective, randomized, patient- and observer-blinded, clinical study, and had received either fixed or a mobile bearing, cruciate retaining Genesis II TKA for primary osteoarthritis. Fluoroscopic radiographs were evaluated by measuring the „patella tendon angle” as a measure of antero-posterior translation as well as the “kinematic index” as a measure of reproducibility. Results: During unloaded movement, fluoroscopic analysis did not show a significant difference between both types of prosthesis designs and the natural knee. In the weight-bearing movement, both types of TKA designs did not show the typically arched but a more linear patellar tendon angle curve, with a greater angle in extension and in flexion than the natural knees. This means that the femur glides anteriorly under load near extension and does not show the natural roll-back in flexion. In the mobile-bearing group, inter-individual deviations from the mean during weight-bearing movements were significantly less than in the fixed-bearing group. Conclusions: In the present study, no functional advantage of mobile bearing TKA over fixed bearing devices could be found. Both TKA designs showed the typical kinematics of an anterior instability. Long-term follow-ups are necessary to elucidate the possible influence of lower PE wear on the incidence of aseptic loosenings

The objective of this present study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the kinematic data derived for all subjects having a TKA who were analysed over the past eight years at our laboratory. Femorotibial contact positions for 705 subjects having either a fixed bearing PCR or PS TKA or mobile bearing TKA were analysed in three-dimensions using video fluoroscopy. During a deep knee bend, all PS TKA types subjects experienced a medial pivot motion, averaging −3.8 of lateral condyle posterior femoral rollback (PFR), respectively. Subjects having a fixed bearing PCR TKA experienced only −0.7 mm of lateral condyle PFR and an anterior slide of 1.6 mm for the medial condyle. Twenty-nine percent of the PCR TKA analysed had a lateral pivot and 71% experienced a medial pivot. Subjects having a mobile bearing TKA experienced −2.8 mm of lateral condyle PFR and 0.4 mm of medial condyle anterior slide. Fifty-one percent of the moble bearing implants experienced a medial pivot and 43% experienced a lateral pivot. During gait, PS and PCR fixed bearing TKA types experienced similar kinematic patterns. Subjects having a mobile bearing TKA experienced minimal motion, probably due to the mobile bearing TKA having greater sagittal conformity and had the lowest standard deviation. There was great variability in the data comparing various TKA designs. Subjects in this multicentre analysis predominantly experienced a medial pivot motion, although certain TKA designs did demonstrate a lateral pivot motion

Introduction: This study evaluated the creep and true wear in 55 medial and in 35 lateral fixed bearing uni-compartmental implants that had a flat articular surface at the time of implantation. Materials and Methods: All the polyethylene components had the same design, the same sterilization, and were retrieved from 11 to 244 months after their implantation. The postoperative deformity had been measured on weight-bearing radiographs of the whole limb (hip-knee-ankle angle). The retrieved implants were placed in a coordinate measuring machine.Using this system, a three dimensional scaled image was used to calculate the total penetration of the femoral implant in relation with true wear and creep. To separate plastic deformation from true wear, the volume of true wear was calculated by wheighing the tibial components and comparing the results with non implanted components. Difference between the penetration determined by the coordinate machine and penetration determined by wheighing was considered to be in relation with creep. Results: Total linear penetration rates ranged from 0.2 to 2.6 mm/year (mean 0.19 mm/year) and was significantly less in lateral (mean 0.14 mm/year) than in medial implants (mean 0.25 mm/year). Linear penetration rates in relation with wear ranged from 0.1 to 1.4 mm/year (mean 0.13 mm/year), and penetration in relation with creep ranged from 0.1 to 1.9 mm/year (mean 0.12 mm/year). The linear penetration of the femoral condyle in relation with true wear was negatively correlated with length implantation in both medial and lateral implants. The linear penetration in relation with creep was higher in the first two years after the implantation versus the subsequent years in both medial and lateral implants. Using multiple linear regression analyses to remove the confounding effects of age, weight, gender and thickness of the implant, we found that an increase of the postoperative deformity was in relation (p = 0.03) with an increase of creep and an increase of true wear for medial implants. But an increase of the postoperative deformity was not in relation (p = 0.34) with an increase of creep or an increase of true wear for lateral implants. Discussion: the postoperative deformity has a high influence on the penetration rate of the femoral condyle in the polyethylene of medial unicompartmental fixed bearing tibial implants. This phenomenon was not observed for the lateral fixed bearing implants and wear was significantly (p= 0.01) less in lateral than in medial implants. This phenomenon (important for the surgical technique and the choice of implant designs) may be in relation with different kinematics in the two compartments