DO WE NEED MOBILE BEARING UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS ?

Abstract

Although good long term results for fixed bearing uni-compartmental knee replacements (UKRs) have been reported mobile bearings predominate in some parts of the world. Three prospective studies have been undertaken comparing the short and medium term outcomes of fixed and mobile UKRs.

• A 5 year comparative cohort study of 47 Oxford mobile bearing and 57 St Georg Sled fixed bearing UKRs.

• A 2 year study of 50 fixed and 50 mobile bearing AMC Uniglide UKRs.(The implant system allows implantation of either a fixed or mobile tibial component with the same femoral component.)

• The 1 year results of a randomised controlled trial of 38 fixed and 33 mobile AMC Uniglide UKRs in patients under 70.

In all groups the preoperative sex mix, average age and knee scores were extremely similar.

All patients were assessed both pre and postoperatively by a research nurse and radiographs were taken; the results were entered on the Bristol Knee database.

Results:

• Multiple problems were encountered, perhaps because of the introduction of MIS, but at 5 years 11 Oxford and 4 Sleds had failed. The major problem with the mobile bearing implant was instability though tibial fractures were also seen. Both groups had three cases of arthritic progression and loose cement was seen twice in the fixed bearing group.

  • – Amongst the remaining patients the median scores for the Sled were better. Bristol Knee Score (Max 100) 95:90; Oxford (Max 48) 39:37; and reduced WOMAC (Best score 12) 18:24.

• 2 bearing exchanges and 3 revisions were needed in the mobile group with none in the fixed group. Again all scores were better for the fixed group. American Knee Score (AKS) (Max 200) 195:185; Oxford (Max48) 39:37; and reduced WOMAC (Max 12) 19:20.

• One fixed bearing implant had been revised but none in the mobile group, however 3 randomised to receive a mobile bearing had a fixed bearing inserted because the surgeon was unhappy about bearing stability; all three are doing well. All knee scores at one year show the fixed bearing implant to be performing better. AKS (Max 200) 194:173; Oxford (Max48) 39:33; and WOMAC(Max) 12 18:22.

Conclusion. Although theoretically mobile bearings will give greater longevity there is frequently a short term price to pay particularly when the procedures are performed by inexperienced surgeons and trainees. Since the wear properties of polyethylene have improved in recent years these studies suggest that a fixed bearing option can be used more safely in many patients.