Abstract
Background
Alignment and soft tissue (ligament) balance are two variables that are under the control of a surgeon during replacement arthroplasty of the knee. Mobile bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacements have traditionally advocated sizing the prosthesis based on soft tissue balance while accepting the natural alignment of the knee, while fixed bearing prosthesis have tended to correct alignment to a pre planned value, while meticulously avoiding overcorrection. The dynamic loading parameters like peak adduction moment (PKAM) and angular adduction Impulse (Add Imp) have been studied extensively as proxies for medial compartment loading. In this investigation we tried to answer the question whether correcting static alignment, which is the only alignment variable under the control of the surgeon actually translates into improvement in dynamic loading during gait. We investigated the effect of correction of static alignment parameter Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle and dynamic alignment parameter in coronal plane, Mean Adduction angle (MAA) on 1st Peak Knee Adduction Moment (PKAM) and Angular Adduction Impulse (Add Imp) following medial unicompartmental knee replacements.
Methods
Twenty four knees (20 patients) underwent instrumented gait analysis (BTS Milan, 12 cameras and single Kistler force platform measuring at 100 Hz) before and after medial uni compartmental knee replacement. The alignment was measured using long leg alignment views, to assess Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle. Coronal plane kinetics namely 1st Peak Knee Adduction Moment (PKAM) and angular adduction impulse (Add Imp)- which is the moment time integral of the adduction moment curve were calculated to assess medial compartment loading. Single and multiple regression analyses were done to assess the effect of static alignment parameters (HKA angle) and dynamic coronal plane alignment parameters (Mean Adduction Angle – MAA) on PKAM and Add Imp.
Results
12 knees had mobile bearing prosthesis implanted while the other 12 had fixed bearing prosthesis. The mean correction for HKA angle was 2.78 degrees (SD ± 1.32 degrees). There was no significant difference in correction of alignment (HKA) between mobile bearing and fixed bearing groups. MAA and HKA angles were significant predictors of dynamic loading parameters, PKAM and Add Imp (p<0.05). Correction of HKA angle was found to be a better predictor of dynamic loading. We assessed the percentage improvement in loading (%ΔPKAM & %ΔAdd. Imp) and its relationship to correction of HKA (Δ HKA) angle Correction of alignment in the form of HKA (Δ HKA) angle was found to be a very strong predictor of improvement of loads (R = 0.90 for %ΔAdd. Imp and R = 0.50 for %Δ PKAM).
Conclusion
Correction of alignment (HKA Angle) predicts improvement in loads through medial compartment of knee. One degree correction resulted in 7% improvement of load through the medial unicompartmental knee replacement.
