Abstract
Introduction
Unidirectional mobile bearing knees (RP) were developed to optimise the tibio-femoral articulation in an effort to enhance function and reduce polyethylene wear. The self-aligning bearing should also benefit the patello-femoral joint further improving outcome. This study was designed to assess whether these potential benefits are realised in the clinical setting.
Methods
A total of 352 patients undergoing a PS PFC Sigma TKR were randomly allocated to receive either a Mobile Bearing (176 knees) or a Fixed Bearing (176 knees) tibial tray. Within each group a further randomisation for patella resurfacing versus retention was included. All knees were scored using standard outcome tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patella Score) by independent nurse specialists.
Results
At 5 year review there had been 38 deaths (19 in each group), 5 revisions (4 fixed, 1 RP), 7 late patella resurfacings (4 fixed, 3 RP) and a small number of other patients had withdrawn, leaving 142 fixed bearing knees and 144 mobile bearing knees for evaluation. The rotating platform TKR design had no impact on range of motion, Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society knee and function scores when compared to its fixed bearing equivalent at minimum 5 year follow-up. Patella resurfacing, however, resulted in a greater improvement in knee function score from pre-op when compared to patella retention (25.5 vs 15.5, p=0.0015), with subsequent significant benefits seen in the SF-12 Physical and Total Scores (p=0.0004 and p=0.017 respectively). 5 year survivorship curves with revision for any cause as the endpoint were similar for both groups (fixed 96.2%, mobile 97.6%). This survivorship rises to 100% for both designs when considering aseptic loosening alone.
Conclusion
There was no difference in performance between the fixed and RP groups. Patella resurfacing offered advantages over patella retention with this design and we would recommend its routine use.
