Abstract
Purpose
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the preferred treatment for those with end stage osteoarthritis (OA) and severe functional limitations. With the demographic transition in society, TKA is being offered to a younger patient population. Younger patients are generally more active requiring an increased range of motion, and place greater physiological demands on the prosthesis than typical older patients. The mobile bearing (MB) total knee prosthesis has theoretically been designed to meet these demands. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of MB and fixed bearing (FB) TKA.
Method
After testing for publication bias and heterogeneity, the data were aggregated by fixed effects modelling. Our searches identified 14 studies for reporting our primary outcome of Knee Society Scores (KSS). We also pooled data for post-operative range of motion (ROM) and Hospital for Special Surgery scores (HSS).
Results
The standard difference in mean outcome scores for KSS and HSS demonstrated no difference between groups (p = 0.902, and p = 0.426 respectively). Similarly, the pooled data for ROM showed no difference between groups (p = 0.265).
Conclusion
The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature indicate that there are no significant differences between MB and FB TKA in the outcome measures of KSS, ROM or HSS at final follow up. Only 3 of 12 studies found any benefit of MB knees in terms of patient reported pain. There were no differences found between FB and MB regarding patellar instability or stair climbing ability. Implant longevity remains the only outcome measure in which MB implants may provide an advantage.
