FIXED BEARING AND MOBILE BEARING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY – A GAIT ANALYSIS STUDY

Abstract

Conventional fixed-bearing (FB) knee prostheses have been proved clinically successful. Rotating platform, mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacements (TKR) have been developed to improve knee kinematics, lower contact stresses on the polyethylene tibial component, minimize constraint, and allow implant self-alignment. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the functional outcome of FB- and MB- TKR during gait and deep knee bends, using a motion analysis system. Two groups of five patients with a unilateral FB TKR (PFC) or MB TKR (LCS) underwent a gait analysis study. The normal contralateral limb was used as a control to compare data in the stance phase of gait. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were equivalent in the 2 groups. Both MB and FB TKRs gave good functional results in spite of different design rationales. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between the two groups. However, gait and knee function after TKR was abnormal even though the patients were asymptomatic. A flexional pattern for flex-ion-extension moments at the knee during level walking was present in both types of TKR. Differences in rotational moments between the two groups were observed, with a higher internal rotational moment in the PFC group (PFC, 0.14 Nm/kg; LCS, 0.09 Nm/kg; p=0.094). A stressful weightbearing activity, such as deep knee bends, amplified the functional differences between the different prosthetic designs, indicating that knee kinematics are activity-dependent. Kinetic and kinematic differences noted between the 2 groups reflect different patterns of joint surface motion and loading, with postulated effects on long term failure of the implants through wear, mechanical failure, and loosening. Gait analysis using external skin markers has a limited role in the characterization of the joint surface motion of the prosthetic knee during ambulatory activities because of errors and assumptions inherent in the technique. However, it provides scope for the study of kinetic parameters acting on different knee prostheses during gait.