Introduction. Stryker computer navigation system has been used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures since October 2008 at the Russian Ilizarov Scientific Centre for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics. Material and methods. There have been 126 computer assisted TKA that accounted for 11.5 % of primary TKA within this period (1096 procedures). Arthritis of the knee joints with evident pain syndrome was an indication to TKA surgery. Arthritis of the knee joint of 27 patients (21.4 %) was accompanied by femoral deformity of various etiology with debris found in the medullary canal in several cases. The rest 99 patients (78.6 %) were regular cases of primary TKA. Results. We compared the results of correction of lower limb biomechanical axis with TKA employing navigation and without computer assistance. Regular TKA procedures showed no substantial difference in the correction of biomechanical axis. Complete correction using computer navigation was achieved in 85 % of the cases versus 79 % of the patients without navigation. The deformity up to 3° developed in 14 % of navigated cases and in 17 % of the cases without computer assistance. An error of deformity correction was 3–5° in 4 % of the cases without computer navigation. Those were cases of challenging primary TKA. So the advantages of computer navigation have become evident with greater deformities, and in the cases when intramedullary guide can hardly be used due to severe deformities in the femoral metaphysis and diaphysis, after several operative procedures of osteosynthesis with deformed, obliterating bone marrow canal or presence of debris. Complete correction using computer navigation was achieved in 85.2 % cases versus 42.8 % patients without navigation. Postoperative varus of 2° was observed in 14.8 % cases (valgus or varus deformity of 3° developed in 28.6 % of the cases without computer assistance). Conclusion. What is better: special instrumentation or navigation?. Current instrumentation can provide regular mechanical control of the limb axis and is based on the principles of intramedullary, extramedullary and even double guide placement. Image-free navigation and standard surgical techniques can equally be used for simple cases of primary TKA. Same landmarks are used. These landmarks are determined by a surgeon quite subjectively and can lead to inadequate usage of special instrumentation and computer navigation. However, computer navigation should be used in the cases when intramedullary guide can hardly be used, not desirable or possible. Special instrumentation can fail in setting a valgus angle needed with extraarticular femoral deformity. Navigation allows determining rotation more precisely in the cases when posterior femoral condyles contour (posttraumatic condition, hypoplastic condyles) is distorted. Assessment of ligament balance can be rather subjective when special instrumentation is used. Application of computer navigation is helpful for measurements of flexion and extension gaps sixe and regularity. Computer navigation is contraindicated for contractures and ankyloses of the hip joint. For the rest of the cases the choice of instrumentation is a surgeon's decision

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). While computer-navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty show survivorship advantages and are widely used, comparable applications within THA show far lower utilisation. Using national registry data, this study compared patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients who underwent THA with and without computer navigation. Data from Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) PROMs program included all primary THA procedures performed for OA up to 31 December 2020. Procedures using the Intellijoint HIP® navigation system were identified and compared to procedures using other computer navigation systems or conventional instrumentation only. Changes in PROM scores between pre-operative and 6-month post-operative time points were analysed using multiple regression model, adjusting for pre-operative score, patient age, gender, ASA score, BMI, surgical approach, and hospital type. There were 65 primary THA procedures that used the Intellijoint HIP® system, 90 procedures used other types of computer navigation, and the remaining 5,284 primary THA procedures used conventional instrumentation. The estimated mean changes in the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) score and Oxford Hip score did not differ significantly when Intellijoint® was compared to conventional instruments (estimated differences of 2.4, 95% CI [-1.7, 6.5], p = 0.245, and −0.5, 95% CI [-2.5, 1.4], p = 0.592, respectively). The proportion of patients who were satisfied with their procedure was also similar when Intellijoint® was compared to conventional instruments (rate ratio 1.06, 95% CI [0.97, 1.16], p = 0.227). The preliminary data demonstrate no significant difference in PROMs when comparing the Intellijoint HIP® THA navigation system with both other navigation systems and conventional instrumentation for primary THAs performed for OA. Level of evidence: III (National registry analysis)

A cadaver study using six pairs of lower limbs was conducted to investigate the accuracy of computer navigation and standard instrumentation for the placement of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing femoral component. The aim was to place all the femoral components with a stem-shaft angle of 135°. The mean stem-shaft angle obtained in the standard instrumentation group was 127.7° (120° to 132°), compared with 133.3° (131° to 139°) in the computer navigation group (p = 0.03). The scatter obtained with computer-assisted navigation was approximately half that found using the conventional jig. Computer navigation was more accurate and more consistent in its placement of the femoral component than standard instrumentation. We suggest that image-free computer-assisted navigation may have an application in aligning the femoral component during hip resurfacing

Introduction. Two aspects are very important for knee joint replacement – restoration of biomechanical limb axis and achieving ligaments balance. Computer navigation allows us to do all this. Material and methods. We analysed 94 knee joint replacement surgeries using computer navigation by “STRYKER”. Results. There is no substantial difference between results of correction of biomechanical axis with computer navigation and without it in case of uncomplicated joint replacement. So, completer correction of axis (varus/valgus zero degrees) with computer navigation was achieved in 84% of cases versus 79% without navigation. There was varus or valgus deformity up to two degrees in 12% after surgery (without navigation −17% of cases). Error in deformity correction without application of navigation was three-five degrees in 4% of cases (all were challenging joint replacement). Advantages of navigation are obvious in case of large deformities, and also when insertion of intramedullary guide is undesirable or impossible. Use of navigation requires good skills of joint replacement, because landmarks should be chosen precisely and possibility of error during determining the center of rotation for the femoral head should be taken into consideration. Duration of surgery without navigation is 82.6±16.4 minutes and is much longer in the beginning of the learning curve (one hour longer or more). After acquiring skills the surgery takes 118±15.6 minutes. Conclusion. We evaluate use of navigation system as a modern and in-demand trend. Use of navigation should be started after getting good skills of joint replacement. Violation of the technology of determining landmarks leads to wrong virtual modeling and serious errors in positioning components. Advantages of navigation are obvious in evident bone deformity, when it is impossible or undesirable to open a medullary canal

Individuals learn to master new motor skills (such as learning a new surgical technique) by evaluating available feedback to alter future performance. Continuous concurrent augmented feedback is supplementary information presented to the learner throughout the performance of a task. An example of this type of feedback is the visual information provided by computer navigation during arthroplasty surgery. This type of feedback is a potentially powerful tool for learning because it theoretically guides the learner to the correct response, reduces errors, and reinforces correct actions. However, motor learning theory suggests that this type of feedback may impair learning because of development of dependence on the additional feedback or distraction from intrinsic feedback. In the current era of reduced number of training hours it is essential to assess the role of computer navigation on trainees. Our objective was to determine whether computer navigation influences the learning curve of novices performing hip resurfacing arthroplasty. We conducted a systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature. There is some evidence from randomised controlled trials that navigation use by trainees facilitates accurate placement of arthroplasty components compared to conventional instrumentation. There is no evidence that training with computer navigation impairs performance in retention tests (re-testing on same task after an interval of time) or transfer tests (re-testing in different conditions i.e. without concurrent feedback). We conclude that although there are significant limitations of the published literature on this topic there is no available evidence that supports concerns regarding the theoretical detrimental effects of computer navigation on the learning curve of arthroplasty trainees

Computer navigation in total joint arthroplasty has been shown to be effective in improving the radiographic outcome in patients undergoing both hip and knee arthroplasty. However, critics have argued that the required capital equipment and added time to perform the procedure is cost prohibitive. To test this hypothesis, we compared our hospital discharge experience with computer navigation to national standards published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for the years 2004 and 2005. In the AHRQ database the average length of stay for DRG 209 in 2004 and 2005 respectively, in the Midwest region was 4.6 days and 4.3 days, with a mean charge of $27,403 and $27,948, with only 40% and 45%, of patients discharged to home with or without home health care. In 2004 and 2005, the senior author performed 125 and 117 Medicare primary hip and knee replacements, respectively, with computer navigation with a mean length of stay of 2.9 days and 2.8 days, with charges of $22,134 and $24,612, and 63% and 71% discharged to home. On a pure charge basis, the senior author experience a decreased overall charge compared to published data. Even if the entire cost of the navigation system in our system $204,000 was spread equally over only the Medicare patients over the two year period, the additional $842/case still results in a case charge below published data. Based on the senior author’s experience with hospitalization cost, length of stay and discharge disposition, computer navigation in total joint replacement is not associated with an increased cost/case and may result in dramatically lower indirect costs due to shorter length of stay and increased number of discharges to home compared to published regional Medicare discharge data

Alignment of the femoral component during hip resurfacing has been implicated in the early failure of this device. Techniques to facilitate a more accurate placement of the femoral component may help prevent these early failures. We aim to establish whether the use of imageless computer navigation can improve the accuracy in alignment of the femoral component during hip resurfacing. 6 pairs of cadaveric limbs were randomized to the use of computer navigation or standard instrumentation. All hips had radiographs taken prior to the procedure to facilitate accurate templating. All femoral components were planned to be implanted with a stem shaft angle of 135 degrees. The initial guide wire was placed using either the standard jig with a pin placed in the lateral cortex or with the use of an imageless computer navigation system. The femoral head was then prepared in the same fashion for both groups. Following the procedure radiographs were taken to assess the alignment of the femoral component. The mean stem shaft angle in the computer navigation group was 133.3 degrees compared to 127.7 degrees in the standard instrumentation group (p=0.03). The standard instrumentation group had a range of error of 15 degrees with a standard deviation of 4.2 degrees. The computer navigated group had a range of error of only 8 degrees with a standard deviation of 2.9 degrees. Our results demonstrated that the use of standard alignment instrumentation consistently placed the femoral component in a more varus position when compared to the computer navigation group. The computer navigation was also more consistent in its placement of the femoral component when compared to standard instrumentation. We suggest that imageless computer navigation appears to improve the accuracy of alignment of the femoral component during hip resurfacing

Purpose. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the effects of computer navigation on blood conservation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing postoperative blood loss and need for allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing computer navigation and conventional primary TKAs. Methods. Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they compared change in haemoglobin concentration before and after surgery, postoperative blood loss via drainage or calculated total blood loss, and/or allogenic blood transfusion rate following TKA using computer navigation and conventional methods. For all comparisons, odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for binary outcomes, while mean difference and 95 % CI were calculated for continuous outcomes. Results. Twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. The change in haemoglobin concentration was 0.39 g/dl lower with computer navigation than with conventional TKA (P = 0.006). Blood loss via drainage was 83.1 ml (P = 0.03) lower and calculated blood loss was 185.4 ml (P = 0.002) lower with computer navigation than with conventional TKA. However, the need for blood transfusion was similar for the two approaches (n.s.). Conclusions. The primary TKA with computer navigation was effective in reducing haemoglobin loss and blood loss, but had no effect on transfusion requirement, compared with conventional primary TKA. These findings suggest the importance of analysing several blood loss parameters, because each may not always accurately reflect true postsurgical bleeding

Introduction. Restoration of normal hip biomechanics is vital for success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This requires accurate placement of implants and restoration of limb length and offset. The purpose of this study was to assess the precision and accuracy of computer navigation system in predicting cup placement and restoring limb length and offset. Material and Methods. An analysis of 259 consecutive patients who had THA performed with imageless computer navigation system was carried out. All surgeries were done by single surgeon (KD) using similar technique. Acetabular cup abduction and anteversion, medialisation or lateralisation of offset and limb length change were compared between navigation measurements and follow-up radiographs. Precision, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess navigation for cup orientation and student t-test used for evaluation of offset and limb length change. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant for evaluation. Results. Mean cup abduction and anteversion was 40.35° (SD, 5.81) and 18.46° (SD, 6.79) in postop radiographs compared to 41° (SD, 5.03) and 14.76° (SD, 6.11) for navigation measurements. Intraoperative navigation measurements had high precision and specificity for determining cup abduction and anteversion (precision >95%, specificity >90%). Accuracy for determining cup abduction was 96.13% compared to 72.2% for cup anteversion. Change in limb length and offset was mean 6.46mm (SD, 5.68) and −1.07mm (SD, 5.75) on radiograph evaluation and 5.41mm (SD, 5.11) and −2.24mm (SD, 5.87) from navigation measurements respectively, the difference being not significant in both (p value > 0.2). Radiograph and navigation had a mean difference of 1.01mm (SD, 2.83) for offset measurements and a mean difference of 1.05mm (SD, 4.37) for postop limb length assessment. Discussion. To the best of our knowledge this is the largest single surgeon study of navigated THA. We found that computer navigation assessment of acetabular cup abduction and anteversion and limb length and offset restoration has high probability of predicting correct placement of implants. To conclude, navigation can serve as an excellent tool for appropriate placement of implants and restoring limb length and offset in THA

Purpose. Patient-matched instrumentation is advocated as the latest development in arthroplasty surgery. Custom-made cutting blocks created from preoperative MRI scans have been proposed to achieve perfect alignment of the lower limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of patient-specific cutting blocks by comparing them to navigation, the current gold standard. Methods. 60 TKA patients were recruited to undergo their surgery guided by Smith & Nephew Visionaire Patient-Matched cutting blocks. Continuous computer navigation was used during the surgery to evaluate the accuracy of the cutting blocks. The blocks were assessed for the fit to the articular surface, as well as alignment in the coronal, sagittal and rotational planes, sizing, and resection depth. Results. All patient-matched cutting blocks were a good fit intra-operatively. Significant differences (p<0.05) in the resection depths of the distal femur and tibial plateau were observed between the cutting blocks and computer navigation for the medial compartment. Cutting block alignment of the femur and tibia in the coronal and sagittal planes also differed significantly (p<0.05) to navigation measurements. The PSCB would have placed 79.3% of the sample within +3° of neutral in the coronal plane, while the rotational and sagittal alignment results within +3° were 77.2% and 54.5% respectively. In addition, intraoperative assessment of sagittal femoral alignment differed to planned alignment by an average of 4.0 degrees (+/−2.3). Conclusion. This study suggests the use of patient-matched cutting blocks is not accurate, particularly in the guidance of the sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Despite this technique creating well fitting cutting blocks, intraoperative monitoring revealed an unacceptable degree of potential limb mal-alignment, resulting in increased outliers particularly when compared with standard computer navigation. Caution is recommended before PSCB are used routinely without objective verification of alignment

Patient-matched instrumentation is advocated as the latest development in arthroplasty surgery. Custom-made cutting blocks created from preoperative MRI scans have been proposed to achieve perfect alignment of the lower limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of patient-specific cutting blocks by comparing them to navigation, the current gold standard. 25 TKA patients were recruited to undergo their surgery guided by Smith & Nephew Visionaire Patient-Matched cutting blocks. Continuous computer navigation was used during the surgery to evaluate the accuracy of the cutting blocks. The blocks were assessed for the fit to the articular surface, as well as alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes, sizing, and resection depth. Actual postoperative alignment was then assessed by detailed CT scans following the Perth protocol, comparing the results with intraoperative measurements. All patient-matched cutting blocks were a good fit intra-operatively. Significant differences (p<0.05) in the resection depths of the distal femur and tibial plateau were observed between the cutting blocks and computer navigation for the medial compartment. Cutting block alignment of the femur and tibia in the coronal and sagittal planes also differed significantly (p<0.05) to navigation measurements. In addition, intraoperative assessment of sagittal femoral alignment differed to planned alignment by an average of 4.0 degrees (+/−2.3). This study suggests the use of patient-matched cutting blocks is not accurate, particularly in the guidance of the sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Despite this technique creating well fitting cutting blocks, intraoperative monitoring, validated by postoperative CT scans, revealed an unacceptable degree of potential limb mal-alignment, resulting in increased outliers particularly when compared with standard computer navigation

Arthrodesis is used most commonly as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA). For successful arthrodesis, a stable fusion technique and acceptable limb mechanical alignment are needed. Although the use of intramedullary alignment rods might be helpful in terms of achieving an acceptable limb mechanical axis, fat embolism and intramedullary dissemination of an infection or reactivation of latent infection might occur in failed TKA cases. However, computer-assisted surgery allows precise cuts to be made without breaching medullary cavities. Here, the authors describe a case of knee arthrodesis performed by computer navigation and the Ilizarov method in a patient with a past history of infection. A 45-year-old man visited our hospital with failed total knee arthroplasy. Fortunately, even though infection was treated by debridement with component retention, mild heating was present over the knee, but ESR(erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and CRP(C-reactive protein) were within normal ranges. X-ray showed subsidence of the femoral component and a radiolucent line around the femoral component. Arthrodesis was planned for this patient due to disabling pain, a long-lasting severe functional deficit, failure of the primary TKA for ankylosed knee, and the patient’s poor economic status and his strong desire for arthrodesis. The computer navigation surgery system and the Ilizarov method were used for two reasons. The first reason was that the patient had a past history of infection. At pre-operative evaluation, even though ESR and CRP levels were within normal range, we could not completely rule out the possibility of latent infection due to suspicious findings such as long lasting disabling knee pain, mild heating over the knee, severe osteolytic radiographic changes around the femoral component. In that situation, inserting an IM rod to achieve acceptable mechanical alignment might have reactivated and disseminated a possible latent infection to the femoral or tibial medullary canals. The second reason was that we wanted to reduce the possibility of fat embolism by using computer navigation without instrumentation within the medullary canal. A CT-free, wireless computer navigation system was applied, with trackers fixed to the femur and tibia and no requirement for the use of an IM rod with component retention. Navigated femoral and tibial bone resections were then performed using Stryker software. The femoral resection was conducted at 0° of flexion to the sagittal axis, and the tibial resection at 7 ° of flexion to the sagittal axis. Arthrodesis was held in proper axial and rotational alignment with bone surfaces compressed together. Finally, knee arthrodesis was completed using the Ilizarov method. Based on our experience of the described case, we believe that arthrodesis for failed TKR, especially failure secondary to intraarticular infection, can be considered as another indication for computer navigation

Introduction:. Restoration of normal hip biomechanics is vital for success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This requires accurate placement of implants and restoration of limb length and offset. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computer navigation system in predicting cup placement and restoring limb length and offset. Material and Methods:. An analysis of 259 consecutive patients who had THA performed with imageless computer navigation system was carried out. Acetabular cup abduction and anteversion, medialisation or lateralisation of offset and limb length change were compared between navigation measurements and follow-up radiographs. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and PPV were calculated to assess navigation for cup orientation and student t-test used for evaluation of offset and limb length change. Results:. Mean cup abduction and anteversion was 40.35° (SD, 5.81) and 18.46° (SD, 6.79) in postop radiographs compared to 41° (SD, 5.03) and 14.76°(SD, 6.11) for navigation measurements. Intraoperative navigation measurements had high PPV and specificity for determining cup abduction and anteversion (PPV >95%, specificity >90%). Accuracy for determining cup abduction was 96.13% compared to 72.2% for cup anteversion. Change in limb length and offset was mean 6.46 mm (SD, 5.68) and −1.07 mm (SD, 5.75) on radiograph evaluation and 5.41 mm (SD, 5.11) and −2.24 mm (SD, 5.87) from navigation measurements respectively, the difference being not significant in both (p value >0.2). Radiograph and navigation had a mean difference of 1.01 mm (SD, 2.83) for offset measurements and a mean difference of 1.05 mm (SD, 4.37) for postop limb length assessment. Discussion:. To conclude, navigation can serve as an excellent tool for appropriate placement of implants and restoring limb length and offset in THA

Hip Resurfacing is now an established treatment option for young active patients with osteoarthritis. However, there is slow uptake of hip resurfacing by some surgeons, with concern regarding failure from femoral neck fracture, a small but significant risk. Femoral neck fracture may follow notching of the neck, which occurs upon preparing the femoral head after inserting the femoral head/neck guide-wire. The placement of the femoral head/neck guide-wire is a concern for even experienced surgeons routinely, and in difficult cases of femoral head/neck deformity this is especially so. For the first time a preliminary series of Durom hip resurfacings, based on the successful Metasul bearing, were implanted using a computer image guidance system. The aim of computer navigation is to optimally place the femoral prosthesis in the correct degree of valgus with good underlying bone coverage, without notching the femoral neck or over-sizing the femoral component. Preoperative CT scanning was not required. A standard posterior approach to the hip was utilised, and a navigation reference frame was applied to the proximal femur. Then using an image intensifier and the computer navigation system, a guide-wire was passed quickly and easily into the femoral head/neck with a navigated drill guide. The femoral head was then prepared safely for the femoral component of the resurfacing, with minimal risk of femoral neck fracture. Computer navigation systems have an important role to play in hip resurfacing with respect to femoral head/neck preparation, as demonstrated from our preliminary study. This series shows the use of computer navigation in hip resurfacing to be both SAFE and SIMPLE with a quick learning curve. It was shown to be FASTER and MORE ACCURATE in the process of guide-wire placement in the femoral head/neck as compared to conventional jigs. Crucially, femoral neck fractures may even be potentially ELIMINATED using this technique. In the future, hip resurfacing in conjunction with computer navigation systems may allow;. - SAFER hip resurfacing, with reduced rates of femoral neck fractures. - Improved TRAINING to include junior surgeons in hip resurfacing. - Surgeons to operate INDEPENDENTLY initially. - Surgeons to operate on DIFFICULT cases subsequently. - The development of MINIMALLY INVASIVE hip resurfacing. - The development of SPECIALIST centres for teaching and difficult cases

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). Computer-navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty show evidence-supported survivorship advantages and are used widely. The aim of this study was to determine the revision outcome of hip commercially available navigation technologies. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from January 2016 to December 2020 included all primary THA procedures performed for osteoarthritis (OA). Procedures using the Intellijoint HIP® navigation were identified and compared to procedures inserted using ‘other’ computer navigation systems and to all non-navigated procedures. The cumulative percent revision (CPR) was compared between the three groups using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age and gender. A prosthesis specific analysis was also performed. There were 1911 procedures that used the Intellijoint® system, 4081 used ‘other’ computer navigation, and 160,661 were non-navigated. The all-cause 2-year CPR rate for the Intellijoint HIP® system was 1.8% (95% CI 1.2, 2.6), compared to 2.2% (95% CI 1.8, 2.8) for other navigated and 2.2% (95% CI 2.1, 2.3) for non-navigated cases. A prosthesis specific analysis identified the Paragon/Acetabular Shell THAs combined with the Intellijoint HIP® system as having a higher (3.4%) rate of revision than non-navigated THAs (HR = 2.00 (1.01, 4.00), p=0.048). When this outlier combination was excluded, the Intellijoint® system group demonstrated a two-year CPR of 1.3%. There was no statistical difference in the CPR between the three groups before or after excluding Paragon/Acetabular Shell system. The preliminary data presented demonstrate no statistical difference in all cause revision rates when comparing the Intellijoint HIP® THA navigation system with ‘other’ navigation systems and ‘non-navigated’ approaches for primary THAs performed for OA. The current sample size remains too small to permit meaningful subgroup statistical comparisons

Background: The rates of primary and revision knee arthroplasty in the United States have been increasing. Simultaneously, several studies have reported increased complication rates when these procedures are performed at low-volume centers. One innovation designed to improve knee arthroplasty outcomes is computer navigation, which aims to reduce revision rates by improving the alignment achieved at surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of hospital volume on the costeffectiveness of this new technology in order to determine its feasibility and the level of evidence that should be sought prior to its adoption. Methods: A Markov decision model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, in relation to hospital volume. Transition probabilities were estimated from the arthroplasty literature, and costs were based on the average reimbursement for primary and revision knee arthroplasty at out institution. Outcomes were measured in quality adjusted life years. Results: The results demonstrate that computer-assisted surgery becomes less cost-effective as the annual hospital volume decreases, as the cost of navigation increases, and as the impact on revision rates decreases. If a center performs 250 cases per year, computer navigation will be cost-effective if the annual revision rate is reduced by 2% per year over a twenty-year period. If a center performs 150 cases per year, computer navigation is cost-effective if it results in a 2.5% reduction in the annual revision rate over a twenty-year period. If a center performs only 25 cases per year, the annual reduction in revision rates must be 13% for computer navigation to be cost-effective. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates that computer navigation is not likely to be a cost-effective investment in health care improvement in low volume joint replacement centers, where its benefit is most likely to be realized. However, it may be a cost-effective technology for higher volume joint replacement centers, where the decrease in the rate of knee revision needed to make the investment cost-effective is modest, if improvements in revisions rates with the use of this technology can be realized. This illustrates that hospital volume can have a substantial impact on the cost-effectiveness of new technology in surgery, and this should be carefully considered by any center considering such a large capital investment

Background. The literature quotes up to 20% dissatisfaction rates for total knee replacements (TKR). Swedish registry and national joint registry of England and Wales confirm this with high volumes of patients included. This dissatisfaction rate is used as a basis for improving/changing/modernising knee implant designs by major companies across the world. Aim. We aimed to compare post TKR satisfaction rates for navigated and non navigated knees. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. All patients undergo comprehensive preoperative evaluation and comprehensive consent process and same rehabilitation protocols are followed as standard practice. Two groups were established depending on whether surgery was performed with or without computer navigation. We included 229 patients in each group. There were nine bilateral cases in the navigated group giving a total of 238 knees. Both groups were similar at the time of surgery (navigated: 68 years (sd9);; BMI 32.46;; (sd5.19);; OKS: 42.2 (sd7.5);; non-navigated: 70 years (sd9);; BMI 32.36;; (sd5.26);; OKS: 42.4 (sd7.3)). The satisfaction rates are recorded as very satisfied, satisfied, unsure or dissatisfied. Results. Of the 238 navigated knees 227 (95.4%) were very satisfied or satisfied;; while of the 229 non-navigated knees 205 (89.5%) were very satisfied or satisfied. Only 3 (1.3%) navigated knees and 9 (3.9%) non-navigated knees were dissatisfied. Seven (2.9%) navigated knees and fifteen (6.6%) non-navigated knees were unsure. The navigated group showed better satisfaction (p=0.049) compared to the non-navigated group and better satisfaction than previously published satisfaction rates [3]. When combining dissatisfaction and unsure responses the navigated group again performed significantly better than the non-navigated group (p=0.021). Satisfaction rates were also compared with published literature, which suggest that 82–89% of TKA patients are satisfied and that navigation has no effect on satisfaction [3]. Our data for the non-navigated knees are similar to high end of the published data. This goes to show that comprehensive education of patients, high volume surgeons and elective arthroplasty unit along with comprehensive consent process can achieve best results. We have also shown that navigation influences satisfaction rates. There were no differences in 6 week OKS data with scores of 28.1 (sd= 8.0) and 28.8 (sd=7.8) for navigated and non-navigated groups(p=0.623), The same was also true for range of flexion/extension (92.1° [sd=13.4°& 91.3° [sd=14.1°, p=0.360) and length of hospital stay in days (median=5 [min=2, max=37], median=5 [min=2, max=19], p=0.959);; for navigated and non-navigated groups respectively. Of those navigated knees reported as ‘dissatisfied’ and ‘unsure’, 50.0% (5 knees) were due to pain in the knee. For non-navigated knees, 66.7% (16 knees) stated knee pain as the reason for being ‘dissatisfied’ or ‘unsure’. Conclusion. A modern elective arthroplasty service can deliver high satisfaction rates. Use of computer navigation further improves even the best conventional satisfaction rates. Industry should promote better surgical techniques rather than bringing out new implants to improve satisfaction rates in total knee replacements

The Gpsystem Medacta vision system is composed of an infrared camera that produces and receives infrared rays reflected by almost 3 reflectors mounted on different rigid body devices (F=femoral, T=tibial, G=guide), in order to determine its position with an error lower than 0.35mm. Data received from this vision system are than elaborated by the Cinetique Gpsystem Version 1.0 system in order to determine the correct cutting guide positioning both for the femur and the tibia. The cutting guide is moved on different planes by 5 electric engines applied on 5 no ending screws. The first step of this system is determining, with the F and the T rigid bodies, patient’s lower limb kinematic in order to evaluate its mechanical axis, its flexion-extension range of movement and its pathological deviations. The second step is evaluating anatomical landmarks to find out the correct degrees of tibial and femoral cuts: these landmarks are the medial and lateral tibial glena, the distal femoral condyles, the posterior femoral condyles, the anterior femoral cortex, the tibial tuberosity, the Whiteside line and the epycondilar axis (each anatomical landmark is identified by multiple points in order to decrease possible errors). The third step is applying the cutting guide and the Grigid body on the femoral clamp in order to estimate the correct level for the tibial cut than, once the tibial osteotomy is done the vision system controls its correct execution and the soft tissue balancing of the knee. The fourth step is calculating with the Gpsystem the correct orientation of the femoral cutting guide and checking its positioning and cutting execution. The last step is applying the test-prosthesis verifying the mechanical axis of the knee and than assembling the definitive prosthesis. Since now we have applied 10 Cinetique knee prosthesis with the Medacta computer navigation system with good results and good positioning of the prosthesis. Medacta computer navigation system for Cinetique knee arthroplasty is innovative for its simple cutting guide and movement device both in their hardware than in their way of using and for a simpler software interface; these characteristics allows faster surgeon technique learning, shortening of surgical time and a better prosthesis positioning

Accurate implant alignment, prolonged operative times, array pin site infection and intra-operative fracture risk with computer assisted knee arthroplasty is well documented. This study compares the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the pre- operative MRI based Signature custom made guides (Biomet) to intra-operative computer navigation (BrainLab Knee Unlimited). Twenty patients from a single surgeon's orthopaedic waiting list awaiting primary knee arthroplasty were identified. Patients were contacted and consented for the study and their suitability for MRI examination assessed. An MRI scan of the hip, knee and ankle was performed of the operative side following a set scanning protocol. Following MRI, patient specific femoral and tibial positioning cutting guides were manufactured. Patients then underwent arthroplasty and intra-operative computer navigation was used to measure the accuracy of the custom made, patient specific cutting guides. A cost analysis of the signature system compared with computer navigation was made. Our provisional results show that the accuracy of the pre-operative MRI patient specific femoral and tibial positioning guides was comparable to computer navigation. Pre-operative, patient specific implant positioning cutting guides were as accurate as computer navigation from analysis of our preliminary results. The potential advantages of the MRI based system are accurate pre-operative planning, reduced operating times and avoidance of pin site sepsis. However, further larger studies are required to examine this technique

Purpose:. The use of computer navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of femoral component placement compared to conventional instrumentation in hip resurfacing. Whether exposure to computer navigation improves accuracy when the procedure is subsequently performed with conventional instrumentation without navigation has not been explored. We examinedwhether femoral component alignment utilizing a conventional jig improves following experience with the use of imageless computer navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods:. Between December 2004 and December 2008, 213 consecutive hip resurfacings were performed by a single surgeon. The first 17 (Cohort 1) and the last 9 (Cohort 2) hip resurfacings were performed using a conventional guidewire alignment jig. In 187 cases the femoral component was implanted using the imageless computer navigation. Cohorts 1 and 2 were compared for femoral component alignment accuracy. Results:. All components in Cohort 2 achieved the position determined by the pre-operative plan. The mean deviation of the stem-shaft angle (SSA) from the pre-operatively planned target position was 2.2 degrees (SD, 2.2°, 95% CI, 0.8°, 3.7°) in Cohort 2 and 5.6 degrees (SD, 4.3°, 95% CI, 3.6°, 7.6°) in Cohort 1 (p = 0.01). Four implants in Cohort 1 were positioned at least 10 degrees varus compared to the target SSA position and another four were retroverted. Conclusions:. Femoral component placement utilizing conventional instrumentation may be more accurate following experience using imageless computer navigation

The presence of retained metalwork, previou fractures or osteotomies makes TKA surgery challenging. Obstructed intramedually canals can produce difficulty with the use of IM instrumentation whilst the altered alignment can result in problematic soft tissue balancing. We present a series of 35 patients with deformity who underwent a successful TKA. Between July 2003 and January 2006 35 patients were operated on between 3 centres. All had extraarticular deformities in either the femur or tibia due to previous fractures or exposure to surgery. All underwent TKA surgery using an image free computer navigation system and extramedullary TKA instrumentation. All patients underwent pre-op and post-operative long eg alignment films. The pre-operative long eg films showed an alignment of 16 degrees varus to 18 degrees of valgus. Post-operative alignment ranged from 3 degrees varus to 4 degrees valgus. The femoral component position ranged from 88-91 degrees from the mechanical axis whilst the tibial component position ranged from 89-92 degrees from the mechanical axis of the limb. Total knee arthroplasty in the presence of extraarticular deformity is fraught with problems in regaining limb alignment and soft tissue balancing. This is the largest combined series of patients in which the same navigation system has been used to provide extramedullary alignment and cuts resulting in excellent component positioning and post-operative alignment. We recommend the routine use of computer navigation in these difficult cases

Introduction: The long-term results of total hip replacement can be improved by accurate placement of the implants, leading to restoration of hip biomechanics and prevention impingement from of implant malposition. Pelvic obliquity from patient positioning during surgery prevents accurate intra-operative assessment of component placement. Computer navigation assisted total hip replacement can potentially eliminate these problems by providing feedback on prosthetic placement during surgery. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of the component placement in computer navigation assisted THRs performed in our institution. Methods: A total of 154 computer navigation assisted total hip arthroplasties performed between January 2004 and January 2005 were prospectively included in this study. Image free optical based navigation system (Navitrack™) was used. All procedures were performed by the senior author using MIS and open posterior approaches. Two independent observers performed analysis of the position of components and leg length discrepancy from standardized hip radiographs. Navigation values during surgery were compared with postoperative radiographic evaluation. Results: The mean abduction and anteversion angles of acetabular component in postoperative radiographs were 41.4 ± 6.1 and 22.6 ± 3.8 degrees respectively, in comparison to the navigation values of 40.9 ± 4.0 and 22.9 ± 3.6 degrees respectively. The femoral neck offset and leg length discrepancy calculated from navigation were with in a mean of 1.5mm and 2.8mm, respectively. There was one complication consisting of a peri-prosthetic femoral fracture that was recognised during surgery and treated with revision of the femoral component to a long-stem prosthesis. There was no early post-operative dislocation or deep infection in this series. Discussion: This study showed that computer navigation assisted THR provided predictable and reproducible results with accuracy in component placement and restorations of femoral neck offset and leg length

Introduction. Computer-assisted hip navigation offers the potential for more accurate placement of hip components, which is important in avoiding dislocation, impingement, and edge-loading. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of computer-assisted hip navigation reduced the rate of dislocation in patients undergoing revision THA. Methods and Materials. We retrospectively reviewed 72 patients who underwent computer-navigated revision THA [Fig. 1] between January 2015 and December 2016. Demographic variables, indication for revision, type of procedure, and postoperative complications were collected for all patients. Clinical follow-up was performed at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Dislocations were defined as any episode that required closed or open reduction or a revision arthroplasty. Data are presented as percentages and was analyzed using appropriate comparative statistical tests (z-tests and independent samples t- tests). Results. All 72 patients (48% female; 52% male) were included in the final analysis [Fig. 2]. Mean age of patients undergoing revision THA was 70.4 ± 11.2 years. Mean BMI was 26.4 ± 5.2 kg/m. 2. The most common indications for revision THA were instability (31%), aseptic loosening (29%), osteolysis/eccentric wear (18%), infection (11%), and miscellaneous (11%). During revision procedure, polyethylene component was most commonly changed (46%), followed by femoral head (39%), and acetabular component (15%). At 3 months, 1 year, and final follow-up, there were no dislocations among all study patients (0%). Compared to preoperative dislocation values, there was a significant reduction in the rate of dislocation with the use of computer-assisted hip navigation (31% vs. 0%; p<0.05). Discussion. Our study demonstrates a significant reduction in the rate of dislocation following revision THA with the use of computer navigation. Although the cause of postoperative dislocation is often multifactorial, the use of computer-assisted surgery may help to curtail femoral and acetabular malalignment in revision THA

Aim: Accurate soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not only technically challenging but also difficult to teach to trainees; we believe that computer navigation provides a very useful tool for objective and reproducible soft tissue balance. Methods: We studied 52 patients (31 females and 21 males) with knee osteoarthritis and recorded the change of the Medial (MCL) and Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) length at full extension and at 90o flexion. Pre- and post-operative results were compared. The assessment was performed by consultant orthopaedic surgeons using trackers and navigation knee replacement software. Data was analysed using the student t-test. Results: The navigation software programme was used to measure the change of the collateral ligament length. Ligament laxity is represented by a negative number and a positive number is used to represent stretching and apparent elongation of the ligament. The medial collateral (MCL) length at full extension ranged from −9mm to 11mm and post-operatively was reduced to −16mm and 8mm, (p=0.042). At 90o flexion the length ranged from −3mm to 9mm and postoperatively was reduced to −8mm and 10mm (p=0.025). The lateral collateral (LCL) length at full extension changed from −10mm to 9mm pre-operatively to −13mm and 6mm post-operatively (p=0.011). At 90o flexion the range from −8mm and 9mm pre-operatively changed to − 5mm and 11mm post-operatively (p=0.005). All the above changes correspond to improvement in the post-operative axial alignment. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that computer navigation provides a useful adjunct to the accurate and reproducible soft tissue balance in knee arthroplasty which can be used to evaluate results and for training purposes

Introduction: While computer navigation has been shown to improve radiographic alignment and eliminate outliers in limb and component position in total joint arthoplasty, adoption has been relatively slow. One argument against the use of navigation has been the concern about the cost of the capital equipment and surgical disposables. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate whether the direct cost of patient care was greater for the senior author, who navigates all joint replacements, than other surgeons, who perform total joint arthroplasty without navigation. Methods: The author’s institution is a 200 bed community hospital that performs over 1000 joint replacements per year. This study consisted of reviewing the fiscal year 2007 data at the author’s institution and comparing the direct costs of medical care, length of stay and discharge disposition for the senior author to his peers at his institution. Results: In fiscal year 2007, the hospital performed 624 primary total knee and 213 primary total hip replacements of which the senior author performed 284(45%) knees and 156(73%) hips respectively. The average charge for the entire hospital was $38, 877 and LOS was 2.7 days for knees, and charges of $40, 076 and LOS was 2.7 days for hips. The senior authors charges were $33, 801 and LOS was 2.4 days for knees and $36, 403 and LOS 2.4 for hips. 78% of the knees and 81 % of the hips were discharged to home overall for the institution and 86% of both knees and hips by the senior author. The capital equipment purchase for navigation was $204,000 or $463 per primary arthroplasty(senior author). Conclusions: Computer navigation did not increase the direct cost of primary total joint replacement for the senior author relative to his peers even if the entire capital equipment purchase was added to the case cost

The use of a navigation system in musculoskeletal tumour surgery enables the integration of pre-operative CT and MRI images to generate a precise three-dimensional anatomical model of the site and the extent of the tumour. We carried out six consecutive resections of musculoskeletal tumour in five patients using an existing commercial computer navigation system. There were three women and two men with a mean age of 41 years (24 to 47). Reconstruction was performed using a tumour prosthesis in three lesions and a vascularised fibular graft in one. No reconstruction was needed in two cases. The mean follow-up was 6.9 months (3.5 to 10). The mean duration of surgery was 28 minutes (13 to 50). Examination of the resected specimens showed clear margins in all the tumour lesions and a resection that was exactly as planned

Computer navigation has the potential to revolutionise orthopaedic surgery, although according to the latest 7. th. Annual NJR Report, only 2% of the 5 800 unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) performed in 2009 were carried out using ‘image guidance.’ The report also states an average 3-year revision rate for UKRs of 6.5%. Previous NJR data has shown that this figure rises up to 12% for certain types of prosthesis. We suspect that a significant proportion of these revisions are due to failure secondary to component malpositioning. We therefore propose that the use of computer navigation enables a more accurate prosthesis placement, leading to a reduction in the revision rate for early failure secondary to component malpositioning. Our early results of one hundred consecutive computer navigated UKRs are presented and discussed. Ninety-two patients having had one hundred consecutive computer navigated UKRs were reviewed both clinically and radiographically. The Smith & Nephew Accuris fixed-bearing modular prosthesis was used in all cases, with the ‘Brainlab’ navigation system. Pre-operative aim was neutral tibial cut with three degrees posterior slope. Post-operative component alignment was measured with PACs web measuring tools. Patients were scored clinically using the Oxford Knee Score. Our patient cohort includes 54 male knees and 46 female knees. Average age is 66.6yrs. Average length of stay was 3.7 days, (range 2–7.) With respect to the tibial component, average alignment was 0.7° varus, and 2.32° posterior slope. All components were within the acceptable 3 degrees deviation. Functional scores are very satisfactory, with an overall patient satisfaction rate of 97%. To date, only one UKR has required revision. This was due to ongoing medial pain due to medial overhang, not related to computer navigation. There was one superficial infection, with full resolution following a superficial surgical washout, debridement and antibiotics. Unlike complications reported in the NJR, we report no peri-prosthetic fractures or patella tendon injuries. Our results demonstrate accurate prosthesis placement with the use of computer navigation. Furthermore, clinical scores are highly satisfactory. Our current revision rate is 1% at a mean of 27 months post-op. Although longer-term follow-up of our group is required, our results compare very favourably to statistics published in the NJR, (average 3-year revision rate 6.5%.) The only major differences appear to be the type of prosthesis used and the use of computer navigation. It is our proposal that computer navigation reduces the number of revisions required due to component malpositioning and subsequent failure. Furthermore, we believe that this challenging surgery is made easier with the use of computer navigation. We expect our longer-term results to show significant benefits of computer navigation over conventional techniques

Background. Bone preservation is desired for future revision in any knee arthroplasty. There is no study comparing the difference in the amount of bone resection when soft tissue balance is performed with or without computer navigation. To determine the effect on bony cuts when soft tissue balance is performed with or without use of computer software by standard manual technique in total knee arthroplasty. One hundred patients aged 50 to 88 years underwent navigated TKR for primary osteoarthritis. In group A, 50 patients had both soft tissue release and bone cuts done using computer-assisted navigation. In group B, 50 patients had soft tissue release by standard manual technique first and then bone cuts were guided by computer-assisted navigation. In group A the mean medial tibial resection was 5 ± 2.3 mm and lateral was 8 ± 1 mm compared to 5 ± 2 mm (P = 0.100) and 8 ± 1 mm respectively in group B (P = 0.860). In group A the mean medial femoral bone cut was 9 ± 2.9 mm and lateral was 8 ± 2 mm as compared to 9.5 ± 2.9 mm (P = 0.316) and 10 ± 2.2 mm respectively in group B (P = 0.001). Average prosthesis size was 6 (range 3 to 8) in group A as compared to size 5 (range 2 to 7) in group B. Average navigation time in group A was 102 minutes (range 45 to 172) and in group B was 83 minutes (range 42 to 165, P = 0.031). Our results show that performing soft tissue release and bone cuts using computer- assisted navigation is more bone conserving as compared to manual soft tissue release and bone cuts using computer navigation for TKR, thus preserving bone for possible future revision surgery

Correct component positioning in hip resurfacing is a key determinant for a successful outcome. The aim of the study was to compare the radiographic and perioperative clinical parameters between navigated and non-navigated resurfacing groups and to look at the effect of navigation on the learning curve. Pre and post operative radiographs were analyzed with respect to neck-shaft angle, implant-shaft angle, notching, lateral position, and cup inclination. The target implant position was to place the femoral component in relative valgus to the neck-shaft angle using the smallest component without notching the femoral neck. The target cup position was 40–45 degrees inclination. Statistical analysis was performed comparing the two groups with respect to implant position, complications and differences between experienced verses inexperienced surgeons. Data was recorded for 51 patients (24 navigated, 27 conventional). There was no significant difference in implant-shaft angle or presence of notching between the two groups. There were two cases of notching in the non-navigated cohort. Lateral positioning (central placement stem, centering component on shaft) was significantly more accurate for the navigated cases (P< 0. 001). There was no significant difference in cup inclination between the two groups. In the non-navigated group three patients were converted to a total hip replacement (one fracture, one impingement pain, one intra-operative notching) and there was 1 case of medial wall fracture of the acetabulum. There was a 14.8% complication rate for the non-navigated group with no complications in the navigated group. Complications experienced 2.6% vs. training 17.4%. Training navigated 0% vs Training non-navigated 30%; Experienced nav 0% vs. experienced non-navigated 5.5%. Positioning of the femoral component in the lateral plane and A-P head-neck ratios is significantly more accurate with the use of computer navigation. Navigation allows for a relative valgus implant-shaft angle that is as accurate as conventional jigs. Navigation is useful as a teaching tool with a reduction in the learning curve and better radiographic placement of components

Aim: The study was conducted to evaluate differences between simultaneous and sequential cementing of the tibial and femoral components in total knee joint replacement in relation to final component alignment. Our hypothesis was that cementing the components sequentially increases accuracy of the final position. Method: This was a prospective and randomised study, performed using a computer navigation system as the evaluation technique to determine the accuracy of implant positioning. All knee replacements (Scorpio, Stryker) were implanted with the assistance of computer navigation. The patients were divided into two groups of 20 patients each. The first group had implants cemented simultaneously where the tibial and femoral components were implanted with a single mix of cement and then pressurized by extending the leg. The second group of patients had the tibial component inserted with the first mix of cement and then impacted. Then the femoral component was inserted using a second mix of cement. Computer navigation was used to measure varus/ valgus cut of the femur, varus/ valgus cut of the tibia, and sagital slope of the tibia. Measurements were made with the components in place, both before cementing and then after cement cure. Results: Our results show a statistically significant improvement in accuracy of femoral varus/ valgus alignment using the sequential cementing technique

Aims. Due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis, limb-sparing resections of pelvic tumours achieving adequate surgical margins, can often be difficult. The advent of computer navigation has improved the precision of resection of these lesions, though there is little evidence comparing resection with or without the assistance of navigation. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of navigation-assisted surgery for the resection of pelvic bone tumours involving the posterior ilium and sacrum. . Patients and Methods. Using our prospectively updated institutional database, we conducted a retrospective case control study of 21 patients who underwent resection of the posterior ilium and sacrum, for the treatment of a primary sarcoma of bone, between 1987 and 2015. The resection was performed with the assistance of navigation in nine patients and without navigation in 12. We assessed the accuracy of navigation-assisted surgery, as defined by the surgical margin and how this affects the rate of local recurrence, the disease-free survival and the effects on peri-and post-operative morbidity. . Results. The mean age of the patients was 36.4 years (15 to 66). The mean size of the tumour was 10.9 cm. In the navigation-assisted group, the margin was wide in two patients (16.7%), marginal in six (66.7%) and wide-contaminated in one (11.1%) with no intralesional margin. In the non-navigated-assisted group; the margin was wide in two patients (16.7%), marginal in five (41.7%), intralesional in three (25.0%) and wide-contaminated in two (16.7%). Local recurrence occurred in two patients in the navigation-assisted group (22.2%) and six in the non-navigation-assisted group (50.0%). The disease-free survival was significantly better when operated with navigation-assistance (p = 0.048). The blood loss and operating time were less in the navigated-assisted group, as was the risk of a foot drop post-operatively. Conclusion . The introduction of navigation-assisted surgery for the resection of tumours of the posterior ilium and sacrum has increased the safety for the patients and allows for a better oncological outcome. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:261–6

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of 3 common methods used to produce posterior tibial slope during total knee arthroplasty. Method: The study population consisted of 110 total knee arthroplasties in 102 patients that underwent total knee arthroplasty. All procedures were performed using a standard medial parapatellar approach and all knees were replaced using the Scorpio Knee System (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) of implants and instruments. Three treatment groups were identified retrospectively based on the method used to produce the posterior tibial slope. Group 1 used an extramedullary guide with a 0 degree cutting block tilted by placing 2 fingers between the tibia and the extramedullary guide proximally and three fingers between the tibia and guide distally to produce a 3 degree posterior slope (N=40). Group 2 used computer navigation (Stryker Navigation System, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) to produce a 3 degree posterior slope (N=30). Group 3 used an extramedullary guide placed parallel to the anatomic axis of the tibia with a 5 degree cutting block to produce a 5 degree posterior slope (N=40). Posterior tibial slope was measured from lateral radiographs by 2 independent reviewers that were blinded to the treatment group. The reported posterior tibial slope for each sample was an average of these two measurements. Accuracy of the treatment group was evaluated using a one sample t test. Groups 1 and 2 were tested for an ideal slope of 3 degrees, and Group 3 was tested for an ideal slope of 5 degrees. An a priori sample size calculation with α=0.05 and β=0.20 showed that at least 24 samples in each treatment group were required to determine a difference of 1.5 degrees between the treatment group mean posterior tibial slope and the ideal posterior tibial slope. Results: The mean posterior slope measurements for treatment Group 1 (4.15±3.24 degrees) and treatment Group 2 (1.60±1.62 degrees) were both significantly different than the ideal slope of 3 degrees (p=0.03 for Group 1 and p< 0.01 for Group 2). This indicates that treatment Groups 1 and 2 failed to accurately produce the ideal posterior tibial slope of 3 degrees. The mean posterior tibia slope of treatment Group 3 (5.00±2.87 degrees) was not significantly different than the ideal posterior tibial slope of 5 degrees (p=1.00). This indicates that Group 3 accurately produced the ideal tibial slope of 5 degrees. Conclusion: The most accurate method to produce posterior tibial slope was the 5 degree cutting block with an extramedullary guide. Computer navigation had the lowest standard deviation and therefore was the most precise method. However, computer navigation was not as accurate in producing the desired posterior tibial slope as the extramedullary guide with the 5 degree cutting block. The manual method of producing tibial slope with an extramedullary guide and a 0 degree cutting block was the least precise method and not as accurate as the extramedullary guide with a 5 degree cutting block

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 3 methods used to produce posterior tibial slope. Methods. 110 total knee arthroplasties performed during a 4 year period were included(2005 to 2009). All operations were performed by 2 surgeons. Group 1 used an extramedullary guide with a 0 degree cutting block tilted by placing 2 fingers between the tibia and the extramedullary guide proximally and three fingers distally to produce a 3 degree posterior slope (N=40). Group 2 used computer navigation to produce a 3 degree posterior slope (N=30). Group 3 used an extramedullary guide placed parallel to the anatomic axis of the tibia with a 5 degree cutting block to produce a 5 degree slope (N=40). Posterior tibial slope was measured by 2 independent blinded reviewers. The reported slope for each sample was the average of these measurements. All statistical calculations were performed using SPSS Windows Version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., IL, USA). Results. There was excellent agreement for the mean posterior slopes measured by the 2 independent reviewers. The linear correlation constant was 0.87 (p<0.01). The paired t test showed no significant difference (p=0.82). The measurements for Group 1 (4.15±3.24 degrees) and Group 2 (1.60±1.62 degrees) were both significantly different to the ideal slope of 3 degrees (p=0.03 for Group 1 and p<0.01 for Group 2). The mean posterior tibial slope of Group 3 (5.00±2.87 degrees) was not significantly different to the ideal posterior tibial slope of 5 degrees (p=1.00). Group 2 exhibited the lowest standard deviation. Discussion. The most accurate method was the extramedullary 5 degree cutting block. Computer navigation was the most precise method, but was not accurate in producing the desired slope of 3 degrees. The manual method with an extramedullary guide and a 0 degree cutting block is neither accurate nor precise

Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has several proposed benefits including reduced post operative blood loss. We compared the total blood volume loss in a cohort of morbidly obese (BMI> 40) patients undergoing computer navigated (n=30) or standard intramedullary techniques (n=30) with a cohort of matched patients with a BMI< 30 also undergoing navigated (n=31) or standard TKA (n=31). Total body blood loss was calculated from body weight, height and haemotocrit change, using a model which accurately assesses true blood loss as was maximum allowable blood loss. The groups were matched for age, gender, diagnosis and operative technique. The mean true blood volume loss was significantly (p< 0.001) less in the computer assisted group (1014±312mls) compared to the conventional group (1287±330mls). Patients with a BMI > 40 and a computer navigated procedure (1105 ±321mls) had a significantly lower (p< 0.001) blood volume loss compared to those who underwent a conventional TKA (1399±330mls). There was no significant difference in the transfusion rate or those reaching the maximum allowable blood loss between groups. This study confirms a significant reduction in total body blood loss between computer assisted and conventional TKA in morbidly obese patients. However computer navigation did not affect the transfusion rate or those reaching the transfusion trigger in the morbidly obese group. Therefore computer navigation may reduce blood loss in the morbidly obese patient but this may not be clinically relevant to transfusion requirements as previously suggested

Posterior slope of the tibial component is an important factor in overall alignment of Total Knee Arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of tibial bone cuts utilizing traditional extramedullary 0 degree and angled 5 degree cutting blocks, and computer aided navigation, in primary total knee arthroplasty. We identified 3 groups of patients. Group one were primary total knees performed using an extramedullary 0 degree cutting block for posterior slope, group 2 were performed using an extramedullary 5 degree cutting block and the third group were performed with computer navigation. Patients in all 3 groups were age and sex matched. All operations were performed by residents or clinical fellows, under the supervision of the senior authors. Lateral digital radiographs were reviewed and posterior slope was determined in a standardized fashion. Two independent blinded researchers assessed the posterior slope using Siemens Magicweb software version VA42C_0206. The average difference from the ideal posterior slope in navigated knees was lower than with non-navigated knees, however this was not significant (p=0.086). The average difference from the ideal posterior slope in computer navigated knees was 1.77 degrees (95% CI=1.28 to 2.26) compared to 2.37 degrees (95% CI=1.56 to 3.17) with the 5 degree cutting block and 2.70 degrees (95% CI=1.73 to 3.66) with the 0 degree block. No absolute significant difference was highlighted between the 3 groups using ANOVA testing (p=0.22). All three techniques used to obtain ideal tibial slope were accurate. Accuracy was not increased by the use of computer navigation; however navigation resulted in less variation in outcome. The two jig based methods produced similar outcomes and either technique can be used successfully

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of computer navigation in simulated fixation of femoral neck and supracondylar femoral fractures using different sizes of guidewires and drills from commercially available cannulated screw systems. Methods: Simulated fracture fixation was performed with 2.5mm, 2.8mm and 3.2mm threaded guidewires and 3.2mm and 5mm drill bits using 20 4th generation synthetic femurs. The drill or guide wire was inserted in the synthetic femurs, using fluoroscopy based computer navigation (24 drills/guidewires in each group). Pre and postoperative fluoroscopy images were acquired with the C-arm and synthetic bone in the same orientations. Virtual and real wire/drill positions were compared, and errors calculated for each diameter of drill/guidewire (sum AP + Lateral error (mm)). Errors were compared using a general linear model with Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance at a two-tailed p-value < 0.05. Results: The mean error for the 5.0mm drill (3.20mm) was significantly less than all the threaded wires (p< 0.05). The mean error for the 3.2mm drill (5.68mm) was significantly less than the 2.5mm guidewire (9.27mm) p< 0.05, and less than the 2.8mm (8.19mm) and 3.2mm (7.14mm) threaded wires. Discussion: For cannulated screws, the 3.2mm drill was the most accurate size tested. The most accurate drill, 5mm, would allow solid screw insertion. However, its large size may preclude screw repositioning, and unlike a cannulated screw, would not maintain fracture position whilst the screw was being inserted

Extensive release of postero-lateral structures may be required to correct rigid and severe valgus deformities during total knee arthroplasty. Current techniques are technically difficult, may not accurately restore soft tissue balance, and are associated with postoperative complications. We evaluated the results of using computer navigation for lateral epicondylar osteotomy during total knee arthroplasty for rigid severe valgus arthritis. We had performed this procedure during navigated TKA in 10 valgus arthritic knees (2 bilateral TKAs) in 8 patients (1 male and 7 female). The mean age at the time of surgery was 65.7 years (range, 48–77 years) and the mean preoperative valgus deformity was 19.25° (range, 10°–36.5°). The mean postoperative limb alignment at the end of a mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 14–31 months) was 0.5° valgus (range, 2° varus–1.8° valgus). None of the patients had any complications related to the procedure with no obvious clinical mediolateral instability and complete union at the osteotomy site was noted in all patients radiographically at the last followup. Computer navigation allows for precisely measuring the difference between medial and lateral gaps as well as the limb alignment and to determine the effect of sequential soft-tissue releases on both. Our technique takes advantage of this feature to accurately re-position the lateral epicondylar block in order to equalize medial and lateral gaps thereby ensuring a stable knee. Internal fixation with compression screws coupled with large contact surfaces of cancellous bone at the osteotomy site allow for early post-operative rehabilitation and ensure union at the osteotomy site

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the commonest orthopaedic procedures. Traditionally the surgeon, based on experience, releases the medial structures in knees with varus deformity and lateral structures in knees with valgus deformity until subjectively they feel that they have achieved the intended alignment. The aim of this prospective study was to record the frequency of medial and lateral releases for computer navigated TKAs. Seven four consecutive patients operated on by a single surgeon were included in this study. All patients had TKA using either Stryker or Orthopilot computer navigation systems. The implants used were Scorpio NRG or Columbus. The biomechanical axis was taken as the reference for distal femoral and proximal tibial cut. The trans-epicondylar axis was taken as the reference for frontal femoral and posterior condylar cuts. A soft tissue release was undertaken after the bony cuts had been made if the biomechanical axis did not come to within 2° of neutral as shown by computer readings in extension. The post-operative alignment was recorded on the navigation system and also analysed with long leg hip knee ankle radiographs. There were 43 female and 31 males in the study, 34 left and 40 right knees with an age range of 43 to 87 years. The range of pre-operative deformities on long leg radiographs was 15° varus to 27° valgus with a mean of −5.0° and SD 7.4°. Only two patients needed a medial release. None of the patients needed a lateral release. The fixed flexion deformities needed posterior release. None of the patients needed lateral release for patellar tracking. Post-operative alignment was available for 71 patients. The post implant navigation value was within 2° of neutral in all cases. The mean biomechanical axis on radiographs was 0.1° valgus with a SD 2.1° and range from 6° varus to 7° valgus. From the radiographs six patients were outside the ±3° range. If one sticks to biomechanical axis and transepicondylar axis as the reference for bony cuts, there will be minimal requirement for medial or lateral soft tissue release. According to our results the use of computer navigation gives a low frequency of medial and lateral release in total knee replacement. Other authors have also found that navigation data can help to give a lower rate of soft tissue release, such as Picard et al. who had decreased their soft tissue release to 25%

Introduction/Aims: Early results of a prospective randomised control trial suggested improved position of components implanted during primary hip replacement. The aim of this study is to definitively show the benefit of computer aided navigation in hip arthroplasty with regard to acetabular component position, stem position and leg length. Method: Eighty consecutive patients were prospectively recruited. Patients were quasi-randomised, on an alternating basis, to undergo hip arthroplasty conventionally or with imageless computer navigation. Postoperatively, a CT scan was performed of the pelvis and lower limb. Using a dynamic CT planning software package, the cup and stem position was measured and compared to the position expected by the three operating surgeons in control cases and the position given by the navigation unit in the study group. Change in leg length was measured clinically and compared with the navigation predicted leg length change. Statistical analysis was performed by a statistician. Results: Thirty nine navigated hips (29 female, 10 male) and forty one control hips (26 female, 15 male) were recruited. In the navigated group, the mean age was 65.7 and mean BMI was 29.1. In the control group, the mean age was 64.7 and the mean BMI was 29.4 in the control group. Uncemented, securfit/trident hips were used in 18 navigated cases and 20 control cases, with all other cases being cemented Exeter stems and contemporary cups. None of these differences were significant using the Mann-Whitney test. The mean operating time was 128 minutes for navigated hips and 84 minutes for controls, the difference significant at p< 0.005 using t-test. There was no significant correlation between clinical leg length change, measured in the operating theatre and the leg length change predicted by navigation. Accuracy of cup and stem placement was assessed by comparison of the homogeneity of variances, the Levene statistic, in the navigated and control groups. The range of cup inclination, cup version and stem version was significantly narrowed in the navigation group (p< 0.05). Conclusion: Computer navigation improves the accuracy of component placement in hip arthroplasty with respect to cup version, cup inclination and stem version with either cemented or uncemented hips

The aim of our study was to compare the precision and effectiveness of a CT-free computer navigation system against conventional technique (using a standard mechanical jig) in a cohort of unselected consecutive series of hip resurfacings. One hundred and thirty nine consecutive Durom hip resurfacing procedures (51 navigated and 88 non-navigated) performed in 125 patients were analysed. All the procedures were done through a posterior approach by two surgeons and the study cohort include the hip resurfacings done during the transition phase of the surgeons’ adoption of navigation. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, height, weight, BMI, native neck-shaft angles, component sizes and blood loss between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the operative time between the two groups (111 minutes for the navigated group versus 105 minutes for the non-navigated group; p=0.048). There were 4 cases of notching in the non-navigated group and none in the navigated group. There were no other intra-operative technical problems in either of the groups nor were there any femoral neck fractures. No significant difference was found between the mean post-operative stem-shaft angles (138.5° for the navigated group versus 139.0° for the non navigated group, p=0.740). However there was a significant difference in the difference between the planned stem-shaft angle versus the post-operative stem-shaft angle (0.4° for the navigated group versus 2.1° for the non-navigated group; p=0.005). There was significantly more scatter in the difference between the post-operative stem-shaft angle and the planned stem-shaft angle in the non-navigated group (standard deviation = 3.6°) when compared with the navigated group (standard deviation = 0.9°; Levene’s test for equality of variances = p≤0.01). No case in the navigated group showed a post-operative stem-shaft angle of more than 5° deviation from the planned neck-shaft angle when compared to 33 cases (38%) in the non-navigated group (p≤0.001). While only 4 cases (8%) in the navigated group had a postoperative stem-shaft angle deviating more than 3° from the planned stem-shaft angle, this occurred in 50 cases (57%) in the non-navigated group (p≤0.001). Hip resurfacing is a technically demanding procedure with a steep learning curve. Varus placement of the femoral component and notching have been recognised as important factors associated with early failures following hip resurfacing. While conventional instruments allowed reasonable alignment of the femoral component, our study has shown that use of computer navigation allows more accurate placement of the femoral component even when the surgeons had a significant experience with conventional technique

Implant alignment in knee arthroplasty has been identified as critical factor for a successful outcome. Human error during the registration process for imageless computer navigation knee arthroplasty directly affects component alignment. This cadaveric study aims to define the error in the registration of the landmarks and the resulting error in component alignment. Five fresh frozen cadaveric limbs including the hemipelvis were used for the study. Five surgeons performed the registration process via a medial parapatellar approach five times. In order to identify the gold standard point, the soft tissues were stripped and the registration was repeated by the senior author. Errors are presented as mm or degrees from the gold standard registration. The error range in the registration of the femoral centre in the coronal plane was 6.5mm laterally to 5.0mm medially (mean: −0.1, SD: 2.7). This resulted in a mechanical axis error of 5.2 degrees valgus to 2.9 degrees varus (mean: 0.1, SD: 1.1). In the sagittal plane this error was between −1.8 degrees (extension) and 2.7 degrees (flexion). The error in the calculation of the tibial mechanical axis ranged from −1.0 (valgus) to 2.3 (varus) degrees in the coronal plane and −3.2 degrees of extension to 1.3 degrees of flexion. Finally the error in calculating the transepicondylar axis was −11.2 to 6.3 degrees of internal rotation (mean: −3.2, SD: 3.9). The error in the registration process of the anatomical landmarks can result in significant malalignment of the components. The error range for the mechanical axis of the femur alone can exceed the 3 degree margin that has been previously been associated with implant longevity. The technique during the registration process is of paramount importance for image free computer navigation. Future research should be directed towards simplifying this process and minimizing the effect of human error

Introduction. It is widely accepted that computer navigation more reliably restores neutral mechanical alignment than conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. Recently, magnetic resonance (MR) based instrumentation has been introduced to the market with a rapid growth in usage. However, a paucity of comparative data still exists on the precision of magnetic resonance (MR) based instruments in achieving acceptable lower limb alignment when compared to other validated techniques. In this analysis, we compare the radiographic outcomes of 3 techniques to achieve satisfactory prosthetic alignment by 2 surgeons using the same prosthesis and surgical technique. Methods. A series of 180 patients who had undergone TKA surgery were included in this study. Two fellowship-trained knee surgeons performed all surgeries using the same cemented, posterior stabilized implants (NexGen, Zimmer, Warsaw, In). Patients were stratified in to 3 groups according to the technique used to align the knee; 1. Conventional Intra-medullary Instrumentation, 2. Computer Navigation (Orthosoft), and 3. MR-based guides (Zimmer PSI). All patients underwent a post-operative CT Perth Protocol to assess coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial implants. A radiographer who was blinded to the alignment technique used performed all radiographic measurements. Outliers were defined at a deviation of more than 3 degrees from the mechanical axis in all planes of motion. Results. The radiographic outcome measures will be presented to highlight the significant differences between 3 groups. In addition, the early surgical experience with the introduction of MR based instruments will be reviewed along with the early problems encountered from tibial sagittal alignment that became apparent with time. Conclusion. The rapid introduction of MR based instruments in to the market by several prosthetic companies has occurred without adequate pre-release analysis. This study will allow surgeons to make an informed decision on whether to use this technology based on validated radiographic measures, when compared to both conventional alignment techniques and computer navigation

Purpose: The aim of our study was to compare the precision and effectiveness of a CT-free computer navigation system against conventional technique (using a standard mechanical jig) in a cohort of unselected consecutive series of hip resurfacings. Method: 139 consecutive Durom hip resurfacing procedures (51 navigated and 88 non-navigated) performed in 125 patients were analysed. All the procedures were done through a posterior approach by two surgeons and the study cohort include the hip resurfacings done during the transition phase of the surgeons’ adoption of navigation. Results: There were no significant differences in the patients caracteristics, native neck-shaft angles, component sizes and blood loss between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the operative time between the two groups (111 minutes for the navigated group versus 105 minutes for the non-navigated group; p=0.048). There were 4 cases of notching in the non-navigated group. There was no other intra-operative technical problem in either of the groups nor were there any femoral neck fractures. No significant difference was found between the mean post-operative stem-shaft angles (138.5° for the navigated group versus 139.0° for the non navigated group, p=0.740). However there was a significant difference in the difference between the planned stem-shaft angle versus the post-operative stem-shaft angle (0.4° for the navigated group versus 2.1° for the non-navigated group; p=0.005). While, none of the cases in the navigated group had a post-operative stem-shaft angle with more than 5° deviation from the planned neck-shaft angle when compared to 33 cases (38%) in the non-navigated group (p≤0.001). For a given patient with a target angle set, it is estimated that positioning precision using the navigation is 1.3° +/− 0.9°, compared to 4.4° +/− 3.6° without navigation (p< 0.0001). Conclusion: Hip resurfacing is a technically demanding procedure with a steep learning curve. Varus placement of the femoral component and notching have been recognised as important factors associated with early failures following hip resurfacing. While conventional instruments allowed reasonable alignment of the femoral component, our study has shown that use of computer navigation allows more accurate placement of the femoral component even when the surgeons had a significant experience with conventional technique

Introduction. Surgical techniques for implant alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a expanding field as manufacturers introduce patient-specific cutting blocks derived from 3D reconstructions of pre-operative imaging, commonly MRI or CT. The patient-specific OtisMed system uses a detailed MRI scan of the knee for 3D reconstruction to estimate the kinematic axis, dictating the cutting planes in the custom-fit cutting blocks machined for each patient. The resulting planned alignment can vary greatly from a neutral mechanical axis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early fixation of components in subjects randomized to receive shape match derived kinematic alignment or conventional alignment using computer navigation. A subset of subjects were evaluated with gait analysis. Methods. Fifty-one patients were randomized to receive a cruciate retaining cemented total knees (Triathlon, Stryker) using computer navigation aiming for neutral mechanical axis (standard of care) or patient-specific cutting blocks (OtisMed custom-fit blocks, Stryker). Pre-operatively, all subjects had MRI scans for cutting block construction to maintain blinding. RSA exams and health outcome questionnaires were performed post-operatively at 6 week, 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups. A subset (9 subjects) of the patient-specific group underwent gait analysis (Optotrak TM 3020, AMTI force platforms) one-year post-TKA, capturing three dimensional (3D) knee joint angles and kinematics. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the 3D gait angles and moments of the patient-specific group, a case-matched control group, and 60 previously collected asymptomatic subjects. Results. Five MRI scans for surgical planning were not useable due to motion artifacts, with 2 successfully rescanned. Ligament releases were performed in 62% of navigation cases and 32% of patient-specific cases. One patient-specific case was revised for failure of the cruciate ligament, resulting in a polyethylene liner exchange for a thicker, cruciate substituting insert. Implant migration at 1 year was 0.40±0.25 mm for the patient-specific group and 0.37±0.20 mm for the navigation group (maximum total point motions; t-test P=0.65). EQ-5D scores, Oxford Knee scores, satisfaction, pain, and range of motion were not different between groups at any follow-up to 1 year, including the polyethylene liner exchange case. The gait analysis showed that there were no statistical differences between groups. PCA captured a lower early stance phase flexion moment magnitude in the patient-specific group than the computer navigated recipients, bringing patterns further away from asymptomatic characteristics (flexion moment PC2, P=0.02). Conclusions. Implant migration was not different between groups at 1 year despite differences in implant alignment methods. Subject function and satisfaction were also not different between groups, despite significantly fewer ligament releases in the patient-specific group. However, gait analysis of a subgroup has not shown an improvement towards restoring asymptotic gait. It should be acknowledged that the production of patient-specific cutting blocks may not be possible for all patients due to the MRI scanning requirements. Continued evaluation with RSA to 2 years will be performed to monitor these subjects over the longer term

Introduction We present our earliest series of computer assisted minimally invasive fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures using the dynamic hip screw. Methods The first five cases of computer assisted minimally invasive dynamic hip screw fixation of intertro-chanteric femur fracture are presented. We used the Medivision Computer Navigation system. Our operative techniques, pitfalls and tricks are presented. All were performed in the standard lateral approach to the femur on a traction table. The minimally invasive cases had a incision length of 5 cm compared with an average length of 13.9 cm for the conventional procedure. Results Technical difficulties in screw placement exists and screw head positions tends to be superior. There was one case of implant cutout. The others recovered uneventfully. Fluoroscopy time is halved, sparing the surgeon from excessive radiation. Operative time is prolonged by about 20 minutes. Patient satisfaction has been very good. Conclusions Our procedure is safe and predictable. Patient satisfaction is high. The small wound allows for less pain and tissue dissection enabling faster and more effective rehabilitation. The instrumentation is based on the existing DHS system and there is no need to change inventory. The option of day surgery and same day discharges for hip fracture patients using this technique is tantalising

We report our five-year functional results comparing navigated and conventional total knee replacement. To our knowlege this represents the first Level 1 study comparing function in navigated and conventional total knee replacement at five years. An origianl cohort of 71 patients undergoing Duracon (Stryker Orthopaedics, St. Leonards, Australia) total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing were prospectively randomised to undergo operation using computer navigation (Stryker Image Free Computer Navigation System (version 1.0; Stryker Orthopaedics))(n=35) or a jig-based method (n=36). The two groups were matched for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, ASA grade abd pre-operative deformity. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. Reviews were undertaken by senior physiotherpist blinded to participant status using validated outcome scoring tools (Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis as per Perth CT Knee Protocol to assess component alignment. After 5 years 24 patients in the navigated group and 22 patients in the conventional group were available for review. At 5 years no statistically significant difference was seen in any of the aforementioned outcome scores when comparing navigated and conventional groups. No statistically significant differencewas seen between 2- and 5-year results for either group. Due to the relatively low numbers in each group these data were compared with retrospective cohorts of navigated (n=100) and conventional (n=70) Duracon total knee replacements performed outwith this study over the same 5-year period. WITHIN the retrospective cohorts no statistically significant differences were found when comparing any of the aforementioned outcome scores. In addition, when comparing parallel scores between prospective and retrospective groups again no statistically significant differences were identified. At 5-years post-operatively the functional outcome between computer navigated and conventional total knee replacement appears to be no different despite the better alignment achieved using navigation

Purpose. Computer navigation for hip resurfacing has been shown to reduce the incidence of technical error during femoral head preparation and provides increased accuracy compared to conventional instrumentation for insertion of the initial femoral guidewire. Limitations to the widespread use of navigation in hip resurfacing include access and cost. A novel, patient specific nylon jig has been developed as a cost effective alternative for placement of the initial guidewire. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of femoral guidewire insertion between imageless navigation, conventional instrumentation and a new type of CT-based custom jig. Method. Six pairs of cadaveric femora were used in the study. Each pair was divided randomly between a group utilizing firstly a conventional lateral pin jig (BHR, Smith & Nephew Inc.) followed by navigation (Vector Vision SR, BrainLAB) and a group utilizing a CT-based, patient specific custom jig (Visionaire, Smith & Nephew Inc.). A single surgeon inserted all guidewires. The planned guidewire position was approximately 10 degrees of relative valgus to the native neck-shaft angle in the coronal plane and neutral version in the sagittal plane. The same coronal alignment angle was used between paired femora. Femurs were positioned in a draped synthetic foam hip model prepared with a standard posterior approach. Guidewire insertion time and placement accuracy for each of the three alignment methods was assessed. Guidewire placement accuracy for coronal inclination and version was assessed by anteroposterior and lateral digital radiographs and was defined as the mean deviation from the planned alignment value. Results. Imageless navigation was more accurate than both the custom and the conventional jigs in coronal guidewire inclination (mean 1.3 degrees, SD 1.2, p<0.047). The custom jig (mean 6.4 degrees, SD 2.9) provided a comparable level of accuracy to that of the conventional jig (mean 5.5 degrees, SD 3.6, p=0.851). Guidewire version using the custom jig (mean 1.0 degrees, SD 0.4) was comparable to imageless navigation (mean 3.9 degrees, SD 2.1, p=0.101) and was superior to the conventional jig (mean 5.6 degrees, SD 2.9, p=0.008). The time required for guidewire insertion using the custom alignment jig was significantly reduced compared to both the conventional jig and imageless computer navigation (p<0.001), with imageless navigation requiring more time than the conventional jig (p=0.038). Conclusion. The CT-based custom alignment jig was superior to conventional instrumentation for guidewire version while providing a similar level of accuracy for coronal guidewire inclination. Imageless navigation provided the highest level of accuracy for coronal guidewire placement. A custom alignment jig may be a better alternative to conventional instrumentation for placement of the initial femoral guidewire in hip resurfacing

Introduction. Blood loss after TKA varied, but not uncommon with up to 1500 ml or a decrease in hemoglobin of 3–4 g/dL. In addition to improving prosthetic alignment, computer-assisted TKAs also contribute to reduced operative blood loss and systemic emboli. These observations imply that navigation TKAs may cause less microvascular endothelial damage than conventional TKAs. Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) have been employed as markers for endothelial or vascular damage. We hypothesized serum levels of CAMs in patients receiving navigation TKAs may be different from those receiving conventional TKAs. Material and Methods. A prospective comparative study, enrolling 87 patients with osteoarthritic knees was conducted. There were 54 navigation TKAs and 33 conventional TKAs. Levels of cell adhesion molecules (CAM) in sera and hemovac drainage were measured by ELISA before and 24 hours after the surgery. Hb and Ht were checked pre- and post-operatively. The blood loss was calculated though the formula by Nadler and Sehat et al. Results. There were no significant differences in gender, affected side, age or BMI between the two group. The calculated volume of blood loss in the computer navigation group was 955 (772, 1164)mL, significantly lower (p=0.001) than the 1265 (963, 1475)mL in the conventional group. The baseline serum CAMs did not differ before surgery. Postoperative serum ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and PECAM-1 levels in the navigation group were 35.5% (p<0.001), 2.0% (p=0.037) and 49.3% (p<0.001) lower, respectively, than those in the conventional group. Discussion. Complications secondary to bone marrow violation are significant concerns after TKA. We provided novel evidence that patients had decreased blood loss concomitant with mitigated postoperative elevation of levels of CAMs after navigation TKA, which is indicative of its less-invasive nature with regard to the integrity of femoral medullary cavity

We previously compared component alignment in total knee replacement using a computer-navigated technique with a conventional jig based method. Improved alignment was seen in the computer-navigated group (Beaver et al. JBJS 2004 (86B); 3: 372–7.). We also reported two-year results showing no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups (Beaver et al. JBJS 2007 (89B); 4: 477–80). We now report our five-year functional results comparing navigated and conventional total knee replacement. To our knowlege this represents the first Level 1 study comparing function in navigated and conventional total knee replacement at five years. An original cohort of 71 patients undergoing Duracon (Stryker Orthopaedics, St. Leonards, Australia) total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing were prospectively randomised to undergo operation using computer navigation (Stryker Image Free Computer Navigation System (version 1.0; Stryker Orthopaedics))(n=35) or a jig-based method (n=36). The two groups were matched for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, ASA grade and pre-operative deformity. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. All patients underwent review in our Joint Replacement Assessment Clinic at 3, 6 and 12 months and at 2 and 5 years. Reviews were undertaken by senior physiotherapist blinded to participant status using validated outcome scoring tools (Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis as per Perth CT Knee Protocol to assess component alignment. After 5 years 24 patients in the navigated group and 22 patients in the conventional group were available for review. At 5 years no statistically significant difference was seen in any of the aforementioned outcome scores when comparing navigated and conventional groups. No statistically significant difference was seen between 2- and 5-year results for either group. Due to the relatively low numbers in each group these data were compared with retrospective cohorts of navigated (n=100) and conventional (n=70) Duracon total knee replacements performed outwith this study over the same 5-year period. WITHIN the retrospective cohorts no statistically significant differences were found when comparing any of the aforementioned outcome scores. In addition, when comparing parallel scores between prospective and retrospective groups again no statistically significant differences were identified. At 5-years post-operatively the functional outcome between computer navigated and conventional total knee replacement appears to be no different despite the better alignment achieved using navigation

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to analyze rotational kinematic patterns in knees treated with either cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), using an intra-operative navigation technique, and to clarify the factors that affect of the rotational kinematics and the difference rotational kinematics patterns between CR- and PS- TKA. Methods. A total of 35 knees (35 patients) were included in this study, deformed valgus, sever flexion contractures, and highly unstable knees were excluded. These knees were allocated to CR (NexGen CR-Flex) or PS (NexGen PS-Flex) implants and underwent TKA with a computer navigation technique (precision N Knee Navigation Software v4.0; Stryker). There was no significant difference in pre-operative parameters between CR- and PS-TKA group: age, femorotibial angle (FTA), and chondylar twist angle (CTA). We measured two points during surgery. First, the skin incision was made and subcutaneous tissue was exposed. The joint capsule was temporality closed by three or four strand suture. Second, after the surgery was completed with satisfactory alignment and soft tissue balance, immediately following wound closure the measurement procedure was repeated. The surgeon gently applied a manual range of motion from full extension to flexion. The angle of internal rotation in tibia to the functional plane of tibia and femur was measured automatically at max extension, 0, 30, 45, 60, 90 degrees, and max flexion throughout the passive knee motion. Result. We categorized the post-operative rotational kinematics patterns to five types. Type A was increasing with the internal rotation angle in tibia with knee flexion. Type B was decreasing the internal rotation with knee flexion. Type C was decreasing the internal rotation from 0 to 45 or 60 degrees, Then graduated increasing until full flexion. Type D was the opposite type of type C. Type E was not able to categorize any pattern. (Figure 1) The individual kinematic pattern was variable in pre- and post-operative knee motion. Both CR- and PS-TKA had a tendency to remain the preoperative kinematic pattern (CR-TKA 66% and PS-TKA 59%) by comparing the pre- and post-operative kinematic pattern. But, type A was increased in post-operative PS-TKA. (Figure 2) We analyzed factors (age, pre-operative FTA, CTA, pre-operative knee extension, and post-operative FTA) that affect the change of rotational kinematics patterns before and after TKA. In CR-TKR, there were not any factors that influence with the changes of kinematic pattern. In PS-TKR, pre-operative knee extension angle affected accompanied by significant difference in the change of rotational kinematics patterns. Discussion & Conclusion. We analyzed the rotational kinematics patterns in knees treated with either CR- or PS-TKR, using an intra-operative navigation. Pre- and post-operative knee kinematics of TKA patients had a variety of rotational kinematics patterns. Both CR- and PS-TKA had a tendency to remain the preoperative kinematic pattern by comparing the pre- and post-operative kinematic pattern Pre-operative knee extension affected to the change of rotational kinematics pattern in PS-TKR

Introduction. Computer assisted surgery (CAS) systems have been shown to improve alignment accuracy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet concerns regarding increased costs, operative times, pin sites, and the learning curve associated with CAS techniques have limited its widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to compare the alignment accuracy of an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device (KneeAlignÒ 2) to a large console, imageless CAS system (AchieveCAS). Our hypothesis is that no significant difference in alignment accuracy will be appreciated between the portable, accelerometer-based system, and the large-console, imageless navigation system. Methods. 62 consecutive patients, and a total of 80 knees, received a posterior cruciate substituting TKA using the Achieve CAS computer navigation system. Subsequently, 65 consecutive patients, and a total of 80 knees, received a posterior cruciate substituting TKA using the KneeAlignÒ 2 to perform both the distal femoral and proximal tibial resections (femoral guide seen in Figure 1, and tibial guide seen in Figure 2). Postoperatively, standing AP hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained for each patient, from which the lower extremity mechanical axis, tibial component varus/valgus mechanical alignment, and femoral component varus/valgus mechanical alignment were digitally measured. Each measurement was performed by two, blinded independent observers, and interclass correlation for each measurement was calculated. All procedures were performed using a thigh pneumatic tourniquet, and the total tourniquet time for each procedure was recorded. Results. In the KneeAlignÒ 2 cohort, 92.5% of patients had an alignment within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis (vs. 86.3% with AchieveCAS, p<0.01), 96.2% had a tibial component alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis (vs. 97.5% with AchieveCAS, p=0.8), and 94.9% had a femoral component alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis (vs. 92.5% with AchieveCAS, p<0.01). The mean tourniquet time in the KneeAlignÒ 2 cohort was 48.1 + 10.2 minutes, versus 54.1 + 10.5 in the AchieveCAS cohort (p<0.01). The interclass correlation coefficient for measurement of the postoperative tibial alignment was 0.92, for femoral alignment was 0.85, and for overall lower extremity alignment was 0.94. Conclusion. Accelerometer-based, portable navigation can provide the same degree of alignment accuracy as large console, imageless CAS system in TKA, while also decreasing operative times. The KneeAlignÒ 2 successfully combines the benefits and accuracy of large-console, CAS systems, while avoiding the use of extra pin sites, decreasing operative times, and providing a level of familiarity with conventional alignment methods

Introduction: We previously compared component alignment in total knee replacement using a computer-navigated technique with a conventional jig based method. Improved alignment was seen in the computer-navigated group (Beaver et al. JBJS 2004 (86B); 3: 372–7.). We also reported two-year results showing no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups (Beaver et al. JBJS 2007 (89B); 4: 477–80). We now report our five-year functional results comparing navigated and conventional total knee replacement. To our knowlege this represents the first Level 1 study comparing function in navigated and conventional total knee replacement at five years. Methods: An original cohort of 71 patients undergoing Duracon (Stryker Orthopaedics, St. Leonards, Australia) total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing were prospectively randomised to undergo operation using computer navigation (Stryker Image Free Computer Navigation System (version 1.0; Stryker Orthopaedics))(n=35) or a jig-based method (n=36). The two groups were matched for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, ASA grade and pre-operative deformity. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. All patients underwent review in our Joint Replacement Assessment Clinic at 3, 6 and 12 months and at 2 and 5 years. Reviews were undertaken by senior physiotherpist blinded to participant status using validated outcome scoring tools (Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis as per Perth CT Knee Protocol to assess component alignment. Results: After 5 years 24 patients in the navigated group and 22 patients in the conventional group were available for review. At 5 years no statistically significant difference was seen in any of the aforementioned outcome scores when comparing navigated and conventional groups. No statistically significant difference was seen between 2- and 5-year results for either group. Due to the relatively low numbers in each group these data were compared with retrospective cohorts of navigated (n=100) and conventional (n=70) Duracon total knee replacements performed outwith this study over the same 5-year period. WITHIN the retrospective cohorts no statistically significant differences were found when comparing any of the aforementioned outcome scores. In addition, when comparing parallel scores between prospective and retrospective groups again no statistically significant differences were identified. Conclusion: At 5-years post-operatively the functional outcome between computer navigated and conventional total knee replacement appears to be no different despite the better alignment achieved using navigation

Recent studies suggest the use of computer navigation during TKA can reduce intraoperative blood loss. The purpose of this study was to assess if navigation affected blood loss after TKA in the morbidly obese patient (BMI> 40). Total body blood loss was calculated from body weight, height and haemotocrit change, using a model which accurately assess true blood loss. The computer navigated group comprised of 60 patients, 30 with BMI > 40 and 30 with BMI< 30. The matched conventional knee arthroplasty group consisted of 62 consecutive patients, 31 with BMI> 40 and 31 with BMI< 30 The groups were matched for age, gender, diagnosis and operative technique. Following TKA, the mean total loss was 1014mls (521-1942, SD 312) in the computer assisted group and 1287mls (687-2356, SD 330) in the conventional group. This difference was statistically different (p< 0.001). The mean calculated loss of haemoglobin was 19 g/dl in the navigated group versus 25 g/dl in the conventional group; this was also significant at p< 0.01. The mean total loss was 1105mls in patients with a BMI> 40 in the navigated group compared to 1300mls in the conventional group (p< 0.01). A significant correlation was found between total blood loss and BMI (r=0.2, p< 0.05). This study confirms a highly significant reduction in total body blood loss and calculated Hb loss between computer assisted and conventional TKA in obese patients. Therefore navigation-assisted TKA could present an effective and safe method for reducing blood loss and preventing blood transfusion in obese patients undergoing TKA

Arthritic knees, for the purpose of surgical correction during arthroplasty, are generally thought to be either varus knees or valgus knees and soft tissue releases are done in accordance with the same concept. This view is dependent on the clinical deformity in extended knee and the plain AP radiograph of the extended knee. This concept is now challenged by the observations from our study of the arthritic knee kinematics using computer aided navigation when performing total knee replacement arthroplasty. We performed 283 total knee replacements with computer aided navigation. Imageless navigation was used with Stryker and Orthopilot systems. Bone trackers were fixed to the bones and through real time infrared communication the data was collected. The knee kinematics were recorded before and at the end of surgery. This included measurement of biomechanical axis with the knee extended and then gradually flexed. The effect of flexion on the coronal alignment was recorded real time on the computer. The results were then analysed and compared with plain radiographic deformity on long leg films. Majority of the knees did not behave in a true varus or valgus fashion. We classified the deformity into different groups depending on the behavior of the knee in coronal plane as it moves from extension to flexion. 2 degree was taken as minimum deviation to signify change, as the knee bends from full extension to flexion. The classification system is as follows. Neutral. Deformity - Varus/Valgus to start with in extension. Gp1. Deformity remains the same as the knee flexes. Increasing deformity as the knee flexes. Gp2. Decreasing deformity but does not reach neutral in flexion. Decreasing deformity reaches neutral in flexion. Gp3. Decreasing deformity and crosses to opposite (Varus to valgus or valgus to varus) deformity in flexion. Gp4. Deformity first increases and then decreases but does not reach neutral. Deformity first increases and then decreases to neutral. Deformity first increases and then decreases to cross over to opposite deformity in flexion. Traditional releases of medial or lateral structures without realising the true picture of what happens when the knee is flexed, may not be correct. From our study it is clear that not all arthritic varus or valgus knees behave in the same way. Some of the releases we perform conventionally may not be required or need to be modified depending on the knee kinematics

Aims: Malposition of the acetabular cup after THR leads to dislocations and impingement, reduces ROM and increases pressure and wear inside the cup. The use of the OrthoPilot? kinematic computer navigation technique may reduce the rate of cup malposition. Methods: After the registration of 3 pelvic bone landmarks, stereocameras record the motion of bone and instument- þxed infrared Ç ridgid bodies È. From these data the hip center, the position and direction of reamers and cup insertion instruments are calculated. Since 2001, 155 cementless plasma coated titanium pressþt cups were implanted by using this OrthoPilot¨technique. The intraop measured data of inclination and anteversion angles were compared to the angles from postop X-rays. Results: In 147 evaluated cases no speciþc complications occurred. After the þrst 35 cases minor primary technical problems could be solved. In the following cases the operation time was prolonged by 9 minutes only compared to conventional technique. The mean intra-operative value for inclination was 41¡, (29–48¡), for anteversion 15.9¡, (3–29¡). The evaluated data from the x-rays were 42¡ (34–50¡) for inclination and 10.9¡ (3–22¡) for anteversion. No dislocation occurred due to cup mal-position. Conclusions: By using kinematic navigation technique an improvement of the cup position can be shown clearly. The intended þnal cup position within the Ç safe zone È can be reached reliable. The technique is easy, safe, quick and inexpensive. The rate of postop dislocations might be reduced

We designed this study to determine the clinical evidence to support use of the five degree tibial extra-medullary cutting block over the zero degree cutting block. We identified three groups of patients from the databases and clinical notes at St Michaels Hospital, Toronto. Group one were primary total knees performed using the five degree cutting block, group two were primary total knees performed using the zero degree cutting block and the third group were computer navigated primary total knees. Patients in all three groups were age and sex matched. The senior author advocating use of the five degree block aimed to obtain a five degree posterior slope. The senior author who advocated the use of computer navigation, or the traditional zero degree cutting block, aimed to obtain a three degree posterior slope. All operations were performed by residents or clinical fellows, under the supervision of the senior authors. Patient radiographs were assessed to obtain the optimal direct lateral view obtained and they were saved on a database. Two independent blinded researchers assessed the posterior slope using Siemens Magicweb Software Version VA42C_0206. Two methods were used and the results averaged. The average posterior slope for the navigated total knee replacements was 0.1 degrees (−2 to 4). The average posterior slope for the five degree cutting block was 5.2 degrees (−2 to 16). The average posterior slope for the zero degree block was 3.79 degrees (−2 to 13). Computer navigated knee arthroplasty patients had significantly less variation in outlier measurements compared to the traditionally jigged arthroplasty patients. They were however, less accurate. The five degree cutting block tended to provide a more consistent posterior slope angle, but both the five degree and zero degree cutting blocks had variability in outliers. Computer Navigated Total Knee replacement provides a more consistent and reproducible tibial cut with less variability in alignment than extra-medullary jigs. The traditional five degree cutting block tended to provide a more reliable five degree posterior slope than the zero degree block, but was still subject to outliers

Introduction. Leg length and offset are important considerations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Navigation systems are capable of providing intra-operative measurements, which help guide the surgeon in leg length and offset adjustment. Objective. This controlled study investigates whether the use of computer navigation leads to more accurate achievement of pre-operative leg length and offset targets in THA. Method. A total of 61 patients were included in the study. A prospective, consecutive series of 24 patients undergoing navigated total hip arthroplasty were compared to an historic, consecutive series of 37 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty without the use of navigation. The changes made to leg length and femoral offset were measured from scaled pre- and post-operative digital radiographs. The target changes to leg length and femoral offset were recorded from pre-operative digital templating sessions. Results. No statistically significant differences in terms of age, sex and body mass index were found between the two groups. Femoral offset targets were more closely achieved in the navigated cohort compared with the non-navigated group (P < 0.05). The mean deviation from the pre-operative target offset change was 2.9 ± 2.7 mm in the navigated group, and 5.1 ± 4.6 mm in the non-navigated group. For leg length, no statistically significant difference was found between the navigated and non-navigated cohorts in the difference between planned targets and radiographic changes (P=0.78). The mean deviation from target leg length change was 3.9 ± 2.9 mm in the navigated group and 4.2 ± 3.4 mm in the non-navigated group. When the navigation system was employed, procedure time was longer by a mean of 6 minutes, however this finding was not statistically significant (P=0.084). Conclusion. The use of navigation helps the surgeon to achieve their pre-operative goals for offset change. The navigation system was not shown to impact leg length management

Our aim was to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability in the establishment of the anterior pelvic plane used in imageless computer-assisted navigation. From this we determined the subsequent effects on version and inclination of the acetabular component.

A cadaver model was developed with a specifically-designed rod which held the component tracker at a fixed orientation to the pelvis, leaving the anterior pelvic plane as the only variable. Eight surgeons determined the anterior pelvic plane by palpating and registering the bony landmarks as reference points. The exact anterior pelvic plane was then established by using anatomically-placed bone screws as reference points.

The difference between the surgeons was found to be highly significant (p < 0.001). The variation was significantly larger for anteversion (sd 9.6°) than for inclination (sd 6.3°). The present method for registering pelvic landmarks shows significant inaccuracy, which highlights the need for improved methods of registration before this technique is considered to be safe.

Background: Leg length equality and femoral offset restoration are important parameters related to success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, it is not uncommon for errors to occur during surgery which can lead to less optimal functional result and potential source for litigation. Several techniques that are commonly used to assess leg length and femoral offset during THA include pre-operative templating, intra-operative measurements with a ruler using bony landmarks, assessing soft tissue tension and using measurement device with a reference pin in the iliac crest. We have previously reported on our precision to reconstruct the diseased hip with THA done without navigation. Post-operative radiographic analysis demonstrated that leg length was restored to within +/− 4mm of the contralateral side in only 60% of the patients with 4 patients needing a shoe lift. With regards to femoral offset reconstruction, it was increased by a mean of 5.1 mm and restored to within +/− 4mm of the normal contralateral side in only 25% of patients. Computer navigation has proven to be a more precise tool to achieve optimal positioning of THA implants and precise biomechanical reconstruction of the hip joint. However, performing complete THA using navigation is complex including the requirement to change the position of the patient during registration. A recent stand-alone CT-free hip navigation software from Orthosoft Inc allows navigation to be used for limb length and offset measurements during THA. We report our results from a preliminary study using this technique in 14 hips undergoing THA. In this technique, a tracker is placed over the iliac crest. There is no need to fix a tracker on the femur. Registration of the following are done: greater trochanter (using a screw), patella (using an ECG lead) and the plane of the operating table (using three points on the surface of the operating table in a triangular configuration). The centre of rotation of the hip is determined by either mapping the acetabulum or by using the appropriate sized calibrated reamer. With the definitive acetabular component in place, the new center of rotation is registered and the hip is reduced with trial femoral component. Re-registration of the new position of the greater trochanter and patella allows the computer to calculate the relative change in the limb length and offset compared to the pre-operative status. The differences in the pre-operative and post-operative limb length and offset were calculated using Imagika software and compared with the navigated values recorded by the computer. The mean absolute error for the relative change in the limb length as measured by the computer when compared to the radiographic measurement was 1.25 mm with a standard deviation of 1.77 mm. The mean absolute error for the relative change in the offset as measured by the computer when compared with the radiographic measurement was 2.96 mm with a standard deviation of 2.56 mm. The process of navigation was quick and on average adds 10 minutes to the operative time. Our preliminary study shows that the accuracy of the navigation software is very good in estimating the change in the limb length intra-operatively with a maximum error of 3 mm. The accuracy was also good in estimating the offset (3 mm or less except in one case where the error was 5 mm and this may be due to technical error in registration). This compares favorably with our own data on THA done without navigation. This easy to use navigation technique has the potential to decrease the magnitude of error in restoration of limb length and offset during THA. We thank Francois Paradois and Michael Lanigan from Orthosoft Inc. for their technical advice

We previously compared the component alignment in total knee replacement using a computer-navigated technique with a conventional jig-based method. We randomly allocated 71 patients to undergo either computer-navigated or conventional replacement. An improved alignment was seen in the computer-navigated group.

The patients were then followed up post-operatively for two years, using the Knee Society score, the Short Form-36 health survey, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, the Bartlett Patellar pain questionnaire and the Oxford knee score, to assess functional outcome.

At two years post-operatively 60 patients were available for assessment, 30 in each group and 62 patients completed a postal survey. No patient in either group had undergone revision. All variables were analysed for differences between the groups either by Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences between the two groups did not reach significance for any of the outcome measures at any time point. At two years postoperatively, the frequency of mild to severe anterior pain was not significantly different (p = 0.818), varying between 44% (14) for the computer-navigated group, and 47% (14) for the conventionally-replaced group. The Bartlett Patellar score and the Oxford knee score were also not significantly different (t-test p = 0.161 and p = 0.607, respectively).

The clinical outcome of the patients with a computer-navigated knee replacement appears to be no different to that of a more conventional jig-based technique at two years post-operatively, despite the better alignment achieved with computer-navigated surgery.

Introduction. Patellar tracking in total knee replacements has been extensively studied, but little is known about patellar tracking in isolated patellofemoral replacements. We compared patellar tracking and the position of the patellar groove in the natural knee, followed by implantation of the femoral component of a PFR (patella unresurfaced) and after implantation of the femoral & patellar component of the PFR. Methods. Computer navigation was used to track the patella in eight whole lower extremities of four cadavers in the natural knee, in the same knee with the femoral component of the PFR (PFR-P) and with the femoral and patellar component of the PFR (PFR+P, patella resurfaced) (Depuy Sigma PFR). The form and position of the trochlea in the natural knee and the patellar groove of the femoral component was also analysed. Values are means+/−SD, two tailed Student's t-test for paired samples. Results. With a PFR-P the patella had a slightly more lateral tilt (0.8+/−0.8° to 2.8+/−2.5° at 40–100° of flexion, p<0.05 vs. Nat), this was more pronounced with the PFR+P (2.0+/−0.7° to 4.9+/−1.8° at 20–90° flexion, p<0.05 vs. Nat., p<0.05 vs. PFR-P at 20–80° flexion). No differences in patella rotation were seen between the three groups. In the PFR-P group the patella tracked a little more medially compared to the natural knee (0.6+/− 0.7mm to 1.3+/−2.6mm, p<0.05 at 20°,80°,90° flexion). The difference was more pronounced after patella resurfacing (PFR+P) (2.1+/−2.0mm to 3.0+/−2.2mm, p<0.05 vs. Nat. at 10°–100°, p<0.05 vs. PFR-P from 10–100°). When analysed relative to the patellar groove of the trochlea/femoral component the patella in the natural knee tracked slightly lateral to the groove (2.0+/−1.7mm to 2.9+/−2.0mm at 50–100° p<0.05), so did the patella of PFR-P (2.0+/−2.3mm to 2.3+/−2.3mm at 60–90° flexion, p<0.05), whilst the PFR+P tracked right on the groove (0.6+/−3.7mm medially to 0.6+/−2.9mm laterally, p<0.05 vs Nat at 10–30° & 70–100°, p<0.05 vs. PFR-P at 10–100°). Distance from the patellatot the epicondylar axis was slightly larger in the PFR-P group (0.6+/− 0.7mm to 1.3+/−1.4mm, p<0.05 vs. Natu at 20,80 & 90°. This was more pronounced with patellar resurfacing (2.1+/−2.0 to 3.0+/−2.2mm, p<0.05 vs. Nat at 10–100°, p<0.05 vs. PFR-P at 20–100°) The patella groove on the natural knee and the implanted femoral component of the implanted PFR had the same radius, inclination relative to the femoral mechanical axis, antero-posterior position and medio-lateral orientation. As intended by the designers the groove of the patellar component extended about 13mm further superiorly and 0.5mm more inferiorly. Discussion. The patella groove on the femoral component of the PFR reproduces the natural trochlear anatomy well. Patella tracking in the PFR-P shows only minor differences compared to the natural knee. Resurfacing of the patella in the PFR+P group causes the patella to tilt a little more laterally and track a little more medially, the distance to the epicondylar axis is slightly larger but this allows the patella to engage better in the patellar groove of the femoral component

Computer navigation was introduced in Australia in 2000, initially with the use of pre-operative computer scans and then later with image free systems. In 2003 the AOA – NJRR began collecting data for knee replacement performed with computer navigation. Meta analysis of the literature has shown better coronal and sagittal plane alignment in total knee arthroplasty performed with computer navigation as opposed to standard instrumented knee replacement. At present, however, there is no data on improved outcomes or reduced revision rates. Information was requested from the AOA – NJRR on the use of computer navigation for both uni-compartmental and total knee replacements. This included numbers of navigated knees done per year as well as revision rates and reasons for revisions of knees performed by computer navigation surgery. Since data collection began there has been 2,651 computer assisted total knee replacements performed which is 4.1% of the total number of knee replacements in this time period. There has been a steady increase in the last three years in the use of computer navigation. There has been an increased number of computer navigated knees performed in the private hospital sector as opposed to the public hospitals and there is a state by state variation in the uptake of navigation. The revision rate per 100 observed ‘component’ years at three years is 2.8 for non computer assisted and 2.5 computer assisted surgery. This is not statistically significant. There is no difference in the early complication rate leading to revision. The use of computer navigation could be expected to reduce the long term revision rates of knee arthroplasty due to better alignment and potentially less wear. In the short term there is no significant revision rate between the two methods of performing TKR particularly with regard to infection or fracture

We have investigated the accuracy of placement of the femoral component using imageless navigation in 100 consecutive Birmingham Hip Resurfacings. Pre-operative templating determined the native neck-shaft angle and planned stem-shaft angle of the implant. The latter were verified post-operatively using digital anteroposterior unilateral radiographs of the hip.

The mean neck-shaft angle determined before operation was 132.7° (118° to 160°). The mean planned stem-shaft angle was a relative valgus alignment of 9.7° (sd 2.6). The stem-shaft angle after operation differed from that planned by a mean of 2.8° (sd 2.0) and in 86% of cases the final angle measured within ± 5° of that planned. We had no instances of notching of the neck or varus alignment of the implant in our series. A learning curve was observed in the time taken for navigation, but not for accurate placement of the implant.

Navigation in hip resurfacing may afford the surgeon a reliable and accurate method of placement of the femoral component.

Stereotactic principles used primarily for brain surgery have been developed further and introduced into spine surgery at the beginning of the 1990’s. The system solutions available consist of three components: the surgical object (vertebra), the virtual object (CT-image data of the vertebra), and the navigatorallowing the surgeon to localise the position of the instrument inside the surgical object in real-time. Optoelectronic systems using infrared light emitting diodes and magnetic field based navigators are in use. Lumbar pedicle screw insertion was the first clinical application for this technique. Screws can be positioned safely following a preplanned optimal trajectory or according to the anatomic situation utilising the real-time module intraoperatively. The effectiveness of this new technique has been shown in prospective studies (Schwarzenbach et al 1997, Laine et al 1997, 1999). In a a prospective randomised clinical trial one-hundred consecutive patients were randomly allocated for either conventional (Group 1) or computer assisted (Group 2) pedicle screw insertion. From the computer assisted group nine patients were dropped out. There was no statistical difference between the groups. CT-based optoelectronic navigation was used for screw insertion in Group 2. The screw position in the pedicle was assessed postoperatively by an independent observer with CT. The pedicle perforation rate was 13.4% (37/277 screws) in the conventional group and 4.6% (10/219 screws) in the computer assisted group (P=0.006). The majority of perforations was less than 4 mm. A pedicle perforation of 4 to 6 mm was found in 1.4% (4/277) of the screws in Group 1, and none in Group 2. Intraoperatively, eleven screws were repositioned in Group 1 and none in Group 2. There were no postoperative complications related to screw placement. We conclude that higher accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer assisted navigation than with conventional methods could be demonstrated under clinical conditions in a randomised controlled clinical trial. At present CAOS Systems are used also for localisation of intraosseous pathologic processes during biopsies in spine and pelvis, sacroiliac screw fixation and vertebral osteotomies. Refinement of the method for use in minimal invasive and percutaneous procedures is in progress

Introduction: Computer navigation has been shown to improve rotational alignment, angular alignment and sizing, when compared to a conventional jig based approach. These studies have all looked at post operative radiographic evaluation as the indicator. This study measures the intraoperative difference between the conventional jig based approach and the computer navigated system. Methods: 59 total knee arthroplasties were performed by a single surgeon between September 2006 and February 2007. The author was trained in this technique during fellowship and has performed over 250 CAOS total knee replacements. All knees were DePuy PFC sigma implanted with the DePuy Ci system using Brain-lab software. The femoral sizing was performed using the jig after the distal femoral cut had been made using the navigation system. The difference between the size recommended by the jig was recorded. The implant was chosen by the computer recommendation, and the jig was used only for data collection. The tibial jig was then placed in the standard fashion using an extramedullary jig. The navigation marker was then placed into the jig slot, and the varus/valgus, posterior slope, and resection height were recorded using the computer modeling as the reference. The jig was then re-aligned if the computer measured angle was greater than 2 degrees in any plane, or the resection height was greater than 2mm. The cut was made using the computer recommended position if the differences exceeded these parameters. Tibial plate size was obtained using the “best fit” technique even if that differed with the computer recommendation. All post operative x-rays were then evaluated with x-ray and obvious outliers in size or angulation were recorded. Results: One tibia was too short to be measured with a jig, so the N for tibial data is 58. Average measured difference in varus/valgus was 1.26 degrees with 53 valgus (range 0–3.5) and 5 varus (range 0–3.6). Tibial slope average difference was average 2.31 degrees with 54 posterior (range 0–6.5 degrees) and 4 anterior (range 1–2.5 degrees). Tibial resection height difference was average 3.31mm with 4 measured high (0–3.5mm) and 54 measured low (0–6.9mm). Femoral sizing using the jig correlated with the expected size using CAOS in 28 of 34 (82%) of cases. Tibial size “best fit” correlated with CAOS in 46 of 58 cases (84%). The tibial jig was repositioned in 20 of 58 (35%) cases prior to making the cut. No tibial or femoral re cuts after the original cut were required in any case. Without using specific measurements, all post op x-rays had satisfactory alignment and component sizing, however 2 tibial plates had mild lateral overhang. Discussion: The data suggest that in most cases, the jig approach is satisfactory, however, the computer prevents outliers. The more preoperative deformity was present, the greater variation between the measurements. The femoral jig in the conventional system we used, does not take into account femoral width, and there is no way to correct for posterior condyle deformity, this is why it is felt that the femoral fit is better with the CAOS system. Femoral rotation would not be able to be measured without using the intramedullary jig, so this step was bypassed, but if femoral rotation followed the other data, the computer would prevent malrotation in some cases. Had the conventional jig been used, the data suggests that at least one patient would have had anterior slope of the tibial tray. One patient had a tibia that was too short to use the conventional extramedullary jig. Since no intra-medullary jig was available on the set, the tibia would have had to be placed freehand if the CAOS system was not available. These data suggest that the CAOS system is preventing erroneous cuts in some cases confirming the data published regarding radiographic evaluations with respect to a decrease in the number of outliers

We compared lower limb coronal alignment measurements obtained pre- and post-operatively with long-leg radiographs and computer navigation in patients undergoing primary total knee replacement (TKR). A series of 185 patients had their pre- and post-implant radiological and computer-navigation system measurements of coronal alignment compared using the Bland-Altman method. The study included 81 men and 104 women with a mean age of 68.5 years (32 to 87) and a mean body mass index of 31.7 kg/m² (19 to 49). Pre-implant Bland–Altman limits of agreement were -9.4° to 8.6° with a repeatability coefficient of 9.0°. The Bland–Altman plot showed a tendency for the radiological measurement to indicate a higher level of pre-operative deformity than the corresponding navigation measurement. Post-implant limits of agreement were -5.0° to 5.4° with a repeatability coefficient of 5.2°. The tendency for valgus knees to have greater deformity on the radiograph was still seen, but was weaker for varus knees.

The alignment seen or measured intra-operatively during TKR is not necessarily the same as the deformity seen on a standing long-leg radiograph either pre- or post-operatively. Further investigation into the effect of weight-bearing and surgical exposure of the joint on the mechanical femorotibial angle is required to enable the most appropriate intra-operative alignment to be selected.

Tibial cut is a crucial step in ensuring adequate and appropriate proximal tibial resection for mechanical orientation and axis in total knee replacement. We evolved the concept and technique of Condylar Differential for planned tibial cuts in conventional total knee replacement, which accounts for individual variations and reflects individual mechanical orientation and alignment.

We used Condylar Differential in 37 consecutive total knee replacements including valgus knees and severe advanced osteoarthritis. First a vertical line is drawn on digital weight bearing anteroposterior radiograph for mechanical axis of tibia. Then a horizontal line is drawn across and perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The distances between the horizontal line and the lowest reproducible points of articular surfaces of medial and lateral tibial condyles respectively are measured. The difference between two measurements obviously represents Condylar Differential. Condylar Differential, adjusted to the nearest millimetre, is maintained in executing tibial cuts, successively if necessary.

Condylar Differential measurement showed a very wide variation, ranging from 8–6 (2 mm) to 10-0 (10 mm). We found that prior measurement of Condylar Differential is a simple, consistent and effective estimate and individualises the tibial cut for optimal templating of tibia. We encountered no problems, adopting this technique, in our series.

Condylar Differential contributes to optimal individualised tibial cut in conventional total knee replacement and is a useful alternative to computer navigated option with comparable accuracy in this respect. While we used the technique in digitised radiographs, this technique can also be applied to plain films, allowing for magnification.

The computed neck-shaft angle and the size of the femoral component were recorded in 100 consecutive hip resurfacings using imageless computer-navigation and compared with the angle measured before operation and with actual component implanted. The reliability of the registration was further analysed using ten cadaver femora. The mean absolute difference between the measured and navigated neck-shaft angle was 16.3° (0° to 52°). Navigation underestimated the measured neck-shaft angle in 38 patients and the correct implant size in 11. Registration of the cadaver femora tended to overestimate the correct implant size and provided a low level of repeatability in computing the neck-shaft angle.

Prudent pre-operative planning is advisable for use in conjunction with imageless navigation since misleading information may be registered intraoperatively, which could lead to inappropriate sizing and positioning of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.

Background

Mechanics and kinematics of the knee following total knee replacement are related to the mechanics and kinematics of the normal knee. Restoration of neutral alignment is an important factor affecting the long-term results of total knee replacement. Tibial cut is a vital and crucial step in ensuring adequate and appropriate proximal tibial resection, which is essential for mechanical orientation and axis in total knee replacement. Tibial cut must be individually reliable, reproducible, consistent and an accurate predictor of individual anatomical measurements. Conventional tibial cuts of tibia with fixed measurements cannot account for individual variations. While computer navigated total knee replacement serves as a medium to achieve this objective, the technology is not universally applicable for differing reasons. Therefore we evolved the concept and technique of Condylar Differential for planned tibial cuts in conventional total knee replacement, which accounts for individual variations and reflects the individual mechanical orientation and alignment.

We have developed a CT-based navigation system using infrared light-emitting diode markers and an optical camera. We used this system to perform cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couple in 53 patients (60 hips) between 1998 and 2001. We reviewed 52 patients (59 hips) at a mean of six years (5 to 8) postoperatively. The mid-term results of total hip replacement using navigation were compared with those of 91 patients (111 hips) who underwent this procedure using the same implants, during the same period, without navigation. There were no significant differences in age, gender, diagnosis, height, weight, body mass index, or pre-operative clinical score between the two groups. The operation time was significantly longer where navigation was used, but there was no significant difference in blood loss or navigation-related complications. With navigation, the acetabular components were placed within the safe zone defined by Lewinnek, while without, 31 of the 111 components were placed outside this zone. There was no significant difference in the Merle d’Aubigne and Postel hip score at the final follow-up. However, hips treated without navigation had a higher rate of dislocation. Revision was performed in two cases undertaken without navigation, one for aseptic acetabular loosening and one for fracture of a ceramic liner, both of which showed evidence of neck impingement on the liner. A further five cases undertaken without navigation showed erosion of the posterior aspect of the neck of the femoral component on the lateral radiographs. These seven impingement-related mechanical problems correlated with malorientation of the acetabular component. There were no such mechanical problems in the navigated group.

We conclude that CT-based navigation increased the precision of orientation of the acetabular component and control of limb length in total hip replacement, without navigation-related complications. It also reduced the rate of dislocation and mechanical problems related to impingement.

We hypothesised that the use of computer navigation-assisted surgery for pelvic and sacral tumours would reduce the risk of an intralesional margin. We reviewed 31 patients (18 men and 13 women) with a mean age of 52.9 years (13.5 to 77.2) in whom computer navigation-assisted surgery had been carried out for a bone tumour of the pelvis or sacrum. There were 23 primary malignant bone tumours, four metastatic tumours and four locally advanced primary tumours of the rectum. The registration error when using computer navigation was <  1 mm in each case. There were no complications related to the navigation, which allowed the preservation of sacral nerve roots (n = 13), resection of otherwise inoperable disease (n = 4) and the avoidance of hindquarter amputation (n = 3). The intralesional resection rate for primary tumours of the pelvis and sacrum was 8.7% (n = 2): clear bone resection margins were achieved in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 13.1 months (3 to 34) three patients (13%) had developed a local recurrence. The mean time alive from diagnosis was 16.8 months (4 to 48). . Computer navigation-assisted surgery is safe and has reduced our intralesional resection rate for primary tumours of the pelvis and sacrum. We recommend this technique as being worthy of further consideration for this group of patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1417–24

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become one of the most successful procedures in orthopedics, and its survival rates are reportedly greater than 90% after 15 years.

Malpositioning of the component, however, can lead to various failures, such as aseptic loosening, instability, polyethylene wear, and patellar dislocation. Navigation systems for TKA have been developed to improve postoperative alignment. Many clinical and experimental studies of these navigation systems have shown that the accuracy of implanted components has improved.

We have compared the alignment of 150 total knee replacements implanted using a computed tomography-based navigation system and using the conventional alignment guide system when performed by a single surgeon. The knees were evaluated using full-length weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs and computed tomography scans. For the navigated group, the average hip-knee-ankle angle, the femoral component angle to the femoral mechanical axis, and the tibial component angle to the mechanical tibial axis were 179.5, 89.4 and 89.7 degrees. The rotational femoral and tibial component angles to the planning axis were 0.6 and 0.3 degrees. The ideal angles of all alignments in the navigated group were obtained at significantly higher rates than in the conventional group. Our results demonstrated significant improvements in component positioning with CT-based navigation system, especially with respect to rotational alignment.

Recently, we established a new method for 3D reconstruction from postoperative CT images in order to accurately measure the alignment of the component relative to any designed plane. The results showed that the discrepancy between the two-dimensional and three-dimensional evaluations was 0.3 ± 1.8 (−2.7–3.4) degrees.

The coronal femoral angle for 36 knees (97.3%) and the coronal tibial angle for all the 37 knees (100%) were obtained within 3 degrees from the optimal angle. It is possible to measure the postoperative alignment for TKA more accurately on the basis of the defining plane. Three-dimensional analysis is necessary to evaluate the accuracy of the navigation system.

We conclude that navigation system is a very useful tool for achieving proper postoperative alignment. Controversy still exists regarding accuracy in rotational alignment with image-free navigation, but our results showed that CT-based system significantly improved accuracy of rotational alignment. We should keep using and improving the systems to establish more simplified and accurate systems.

Computer aided joint replacement surgery is being used increasingly. It is more commonly used at present in the knee replacement surgery as compared to hip replacement arthroplasty. It is still under developmental phase. The published literature shows there is increased accuracy of the component placement of acetabular cup and femoral stem. We describe the technique for the Stryker navigation system as used in total hip arthroplasty. The technique used by us presently is an active tracker system. This is a both way communication system of infrared waves between the trackers and the sensors. The trackers are fixed to the bones, then the registration of patient specific anatomy is done and hip arthroplasty is performed with aid of the computer navigation. The computer navigation gives the values of the component orientation in space. It gives the implant position in the pelvis and femur models generated by the computer but fed in and created by the surgeon. It is important that the data fed to the computer in making the model of pelvis and femur is accurate. It is surgeon dependent. At the end of surgery one can also evaluate impingement and range of motion. It also shows the change in offset of the centre of rotation of the hip as well as leg lengthening. While it can aid in the technical performance it is essential that the surgeon does not go blind to his operating environment as the computer navigation is to help the surgeon, not replace

Introduction

The KneeAlign2 (OrthAlign, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) is a portable accelerometer-based navigation device for use in performing the distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This device works as a computer-assisted surgical system. It does not require the use of a large console for registration and alignment feedback.(image1,2)

The surgical management of musculoskeletal tumours is a challenging problem, particularly in pelvic and diaphyseal tumour resection where accurate determination of bony transection points is extremely important to optimise oncologic, functional and reconstructive options. The use of computer assisted navigation in these cases could improve surgical precision. We resected musculoskeletal tumours in fifteen patients using commercially available computer navigation software (Orthomap 3D). Of the eight pelvic tumours, three underwent biological reconstruction with extra corporeal irradiation; three endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) and two required no bony reconstruction. Four diaphyseal tumours had biological reconstruction. Two patients with proximal femoral sarcoma underwent extra-articular resection and EPR. One soft tissue sarcoma of the adductor compartment involving the femur was resected with EPR. Histological examination of the resected specimens revealed tumour free margins in all cases. Post-operative radiographs and CT show resection and reconstruction as planned in all cases. Several learning points were identified related to juvenile bony anatomy and intra-operative registration. The use of computer navigation in musculoskeletal oncology allows integration of local anatomy and tumour extent to identify resection margins accurately. Furthermore, it can aid in reconstruction following tumour resection. Our experience thus far has been encouraging

The surgical management of musculoskeletal tumours is a challenging problem, particularly in pelvic and diaphyseal tumour resection where accurate determination of bony transection points is extremely important to optimise oncologic, functional and reconstructive options. The use of computer assisted navigation in these cases could improve surgical precision and achieve pre-planned oncological margins with improved accuracy. We resected musculoskeletal tumours in ten patients using commercially available computer navigation software (Orthomap 3D, Stryker UK Ltd). Of the five pelvic tumours, two underwent biological reconstruction with extra corporeal irradiation, two endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) and one did not require bony reconstruction. Three tibial diaphyseal tumours had biological reconstruction. One patient with proximal femoral sarcoma underwent extra-articular resection and EPR. One soft tissue sarcoma of the adductor compartment involving the femur was resected with EPR. Histological examination of the resected specimens revealed tumour free margins in all cases. Post-operative radiographs and CT show resection and reconstruction as planned in all cases. Several learning points were identified related to juvenile bony anatomy and intra-operative registration. The use of computer navigation in musculoskeletal oncology allows integration of local anatomy and tumour extent to identify resection margins accurately. Furthermore, it can aid in reconstruction following tumour resection. Our experience thus far has been encouraging. Further clinical trials are required to evaluate its long-term impact on functional & oncological outcomes

Background. The surgical management of musculoskeletal tumours is a challenging problem, particularly in pelvic and diaphyseal tumour resection where accurate determination of bony transection points is extremely important to optimise oncologic, functional and reconstructive options. The use of computer assisted navigation in these cases could improve surgical precision. Materials and methods. We resected musculoskeletal tumours in fifteen patients using commercially available computer navigation software (Orthomap 3D). Results. Of the eight pelvic tumours, three underwent biological reconstruction with extra corporeal irradiation, three endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) and two required no bony reconstruction. Four diaphyseal tumours had biological reconstruction. Two patients with proximal femoral sarcoma underwent extra-articular resection and EPR. One soft tissue sarcoma of the adductor compartment involving the femur was resected with EPR. Histological examination of the resected specimens revealed tumour free margins in all cases. Post-operative radiographs and CT show resection and reconstruction as planned in all cases. Several learning points were identified related to juvenile bony anatomy and intra-operative registration. Discussion. The use of computer navigation in musculoskeletal oncology allows integration of local anatomy and tumour extent to identify resection margins accurately. Furthermore, it can aid in reconstruction following tumour resection. Our experience thus far has been encouraging

Introduction: Obesity [Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30] is seen in a growing percentage of patients seeking joint replacement surgery. Recent studies have shown no clear influence of obesity on the five-year, clinical outcome of total knee replacement; except for the morbidly obese (BMI > 40). Computer navigation has shown improved consistency of prosthetic component alignment. However, this aid does significantly increase operation time. Aims:. To compare tourniquet times of standard and computer assisted total knee arthroplasty in patients with BMI more than 30. To evaluate the change in this variable as a surgeon gained experience over a three year period. Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis of 82, obese, total knee replacements performed by a single surgeon, at a dedicated arthroplasty centre, was undertaken. Conventional knee replacement instrumentation (Plus Orthopaedics, UK) was used in 42 cases and computer assisted navigation (Galileo- Plus Orthopaedics) in 39 cases. The patients were divided into three equal sized groups (1, 2 & 3), in chronological order. Each group comprised fourteen knees undertaken using standard surgical technique and thirteen knees using computer assisted navigation. Group1 had average tourniquet times of 95.69 and 111.67 minutes in the standard and computer assisted groups respectively (p 0.01). Group 2 tourniquet times were 80.75 and 92.33 minutes (p 0.05). Group 3 tourniquet times were 84.5 and 87.5 minutes; these were not significantly different. Conclusions: As the surgeon acquired experience of computer assisted navigation, his tourniquet times decreased and by the end of our study period, there was no longer any difference between the tourniquet times for conventional and computer assisted knee replacement in this subgroup of obese patients. We hypothesise that in obese patients, computer assisted navigation helps the surgeon to overcome jig alignment uncertainty and thus improves accuracy of component alignment without any significant time penalty

Background

Resection of sacral chordoma remains challenging because complex anatomy and important nerves in the sacrum make it difficult to achieve wide surgical margins. Computer-assisted navigation has shown promise in aiding in optimal preoperative planning and in providing accurate and precise tumour resection during surgery.

Background. Limb length discrepancy after total hip replacement is one of the possible complications of suboptimal positioning of the implant and cause of patients dissatisfaction. Computer assisted navigation become affirmed in last years for total hip replacement surgery and it is also used for the evaluation of the intra-operative limb length discrepancy. The purpose of this study is to verify the reliability of a navigation system with a dedicated software in intraoperative evaluation of limb lengthening and offset as compared with manual technique. Methods. Forty patients who underwent a Total Hip Arthroplasty in our institution were entrolled in this study. Twenty patients were evaluated with pre operative manual planning (group A) and treated with hand positioning of femoral stem. Twenty Patient were evaluated with preoperative manual planning and treated with Computer assisted navigation of Stem (group B). Mean operating time and blood loss were analyzed. Radiological and clinical follow up was made at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative to assess any mismatch of implant, complications and clinical results that was measured with Harris Hip Score. Results. In the evaluation of the limb length and offset in group A there wasn't significance difference between pre and postoperative measurements obtained with manual planning. Also in group B there wasn't a significance difference between the measurement obtained intraoperative with computer assisted navigation and the one obtainedafter surgery and preoperative with manual planning. In any case we noted a limb length discrepancy in this series. No statistically significance difference was noted between the two groups in relations to the others parameters investigated. Conclusions. Based on our study the computer navigation system is a simple and reliable for the evaluation of limb length discrepancy and offset in total hip replacement. This Navigation system can offer to the surgeon a valid intraoperative information that can reduce possible errors in stem positioning and can reduce rate of length discrepancy

Background

Differences of dynamic (extension vs. flexion) coronal alignment in osteoarthritic (OA) knees undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain poorly studied.

Restoration of the native joint line in total knee arthroplasty is important in restoring ligamentous balance and normal knee kinematics. Failure to achieve this could lead to reduced range of motion, patellofemoral maltracking and suboptimal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical and functional outcome of patients who demonstrated joint line changes after computer-assisted (CAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

A prospective study was conducted for 168 patients (168 knees) who underwent CAS TKA by two surgeons at a single institution with an average follow-up of two years. The final change in joint line was calculated from the verified tibial resection, distal and posterior femoral cuts. Group A patients had joint line changes of less than 4mm and Group B patients had joint line changes of more than 4mm. Postoperative Oxford scores, Knee scores, Function scores and SF-36 scores were obtained at six months, one year and two years post-TKA. The final range of motion and the mechanical alignment were documented.

There was significant linear correlation between joint line changes and Oxford scores (p = 0.05) and Function scores (p = 0.05) at six months and Oxford scores alone at two years with increasing joint line changes having poorer outcome scores. Group A compared to Group B patients have better outcomes in terms of Oxford scores (mean 20 vs 27, p = 0.0003), Function scores (mean 69 vs 59, p = 0.03), SF-1 (mean 63 vs 50, p = 0.03), SF-2 (mean 66 vs 43, p = 0.05), SF-5 (mean 75 vs 63, p = 0.04), SF-6 (mean 84 vs 59, p = 0.003), SF-7 (mean 96 vs 83, p = 0.02), SF-8 (mean 84 vs 73, p = 0.006) and total SF-36 scores (mean 603 vs 487, P = 0.003), at six months, and Oxford scores (mean 18 vs 23, p = 0.0007) at two years.

In this study, CAS is a useful intra-operative tool for assessing the final joint line in TKA. Outliers in joint line changes of ≥ 4 mm are associated with poorer clinical outcome scores.

Aims: To study knee kinematics using a dynamic computer model of 2 cadaver knees obtained by bone morphing. Patellar kinematics was simultaneously investigated using transosseous pins. Method: Ligamentous injuries were done (dicision of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and of the popliteus). While maintaining the foot in slight external rotation, femoral rotation was measured in relation to knee flexion in the intact and injured knee. Results: The screw home rotation between −5 and +5° was comprised between 8 and 10°. From 10° on, the lateral condyle roll-back induced 30° of femoral external rotation. Femoral rotation could be blocked by externally rotating the tibia. On the screen, the rollback of the lateral condyle and the lift-off of the medial condyle at the end of the flexion appeared clearly. The patella rotated about its longitudinal axis. Moreover, it made a lateral translation. At deep knee flexion, it contacted mainly the lateral condyle. Dicision of the ACL decreased the screw home rotation to 3° and the femoral external rotation to 20°. At 110° and over, femoral rotation ceased, while both condyles rolled anteriorly. Dicision of the popliteus reduced the lateral condyle roll-back by 50%. Conclusion: 2 types of movement can be described: the end of rotation depending of the ACL; the external rotation of the femur depending on the popliteus.

Opening-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) has been shown to be an effective procedure to treat mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee in active individuals. It has also become a mandatory surgical adjunct to articular cartilage restoration when there is preoperative mal-alignment. However, its efficacy is directly correlated with the accuracy of the correction, which must be within 3° of the preoperative target. Achieving this goal is a significant challenge with conventional techniques. Therefore, computer-assisted navigation protocols have been developed; however, they do not adequately address the technical difficulties associated with this procedure. We present an integrated solution dedicated to the opening-wedge HTO. Advantages to the technique we propose include: 1) a minimum number of implanted bone trackers, 2) depth control of the saw, 3) improved 3-D accuracy in the location of the lateral tibial hinge, and 4) micrometric adjustment of the degree of correction. The proof of concept has been completed on all six specimens. The following key points have been validated: a) Compatibility with a minimally-invasive (5–6 cm) surgical incision b) The compact navigation station can be placed close to the operative field and manipulated through a sterile draping device c) Only two trackers are necessary to acquire the required landmarks and to provide 3-D control of the correction. These can be inserted within the surgical wound without any secondary incisions d) The optimised guide accurately controlled the external tibial hinge in all six cases e) The implant cavity could be milled effectively f) The distractor used to complete the desired realignment maintained stability of the distraction until final fixation with the PEEK implant g) The PEEK implant could be fixed to the tibia with excellent stability in a low-profile fashion. The solution presented here has the potential to help surgeons perform a medial opening-wedge HTO more safely and accurately. This will likely result in an increase in the number of HTOs performed for both isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis as well as for lower extremity realignment in association with cartilage restorative procedures.

Introduction: The knee joint replacement arthroplasty is a very successful procedure. Traditionally we aim to perform the arthroplasty and recreate the patients’ biomechanical axis and correct the coronal plain alignment deformity. Unfortunately till recently there was no fine way of controlling the exact alignment and depending on surgeon to surgeon, a valgus (to anatomical axis) of 3 to 7 degrees is aimed for using mechanical intra or extramedullary jigs. On proper measurements only 70–80% of knees achieve the aimed result at best as can be seen in the literature. With the advent of computer aided navigation we can now achieve the desired alignment in a much higher percentage of patients. Material: We performed 1000 total knee arthroplasties at our hospital. Out of these 500 were performed using computer navigation and 500 using conventional mechanical jigs. Pre op and post op long leg alignment films were taken using standardised method. The data was collected using oxford scores and from computer navigation machines and plain radiographic analysis. The observers doing the radiographic analysis were blinded as to whether the patient had procedure done by conventional means or by computer navigation. Sub grouping of the deformities was done depending on the amount of deformity. Results: 500 patients had the operation done by conventional means and the other 500 with computer navigation guidance. Further subgroups were made depending on the amount of pre-existing radiological deformity 0–5, 6–10, 11–15 and more than 15 degrees of varus or valgus deformity. The effect of gender, bmi, surgeon experience, clinical oxford score outcome was also considered. It was clear that the patients who had more severe deformities and valgus deformities had better post operative alignments after the procedure was performed with computer navigation as compared with the conventional means. There was statistically significant difference observed between the subgroups. Discussion: Orthopaedic surgery has improved with technical advancements over the number of years. With any new procedure it takes a long time to shed the old beliefs and adapt the new concepts. While we have plenty of evidence in literature and from our study that computer navigation can give better desired alignment after total knee arthroplasty especially with more severe deformities, it still needs to be taken up by majority of orthopaedic surgeons. Ours is the first study to demonstrate the difference in the specific subgroups

Femoral intramedullary canal referencing is utilized by most of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems. Violation of the canal is performed in order to engage rod instruments in the femoral diaphysis and to refer of the anatomical axis of the femur. Fat embolism, activation of the coagulation cascade, and bleeding may occur from the reamed femoral canal. The purpose of our study was to validate a new set of _minimally-invasive friendly_ instruments which allow to prepare the femur without violating the intramedullary canal. Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA through a mini-subvastus approach were enrolled in the study after informed consent had been obtained. Results of this cohort (group 1) were compared to another contemporary group (group 2) of 25 TKAs operated by the same surgeon using intramedullary instruments. The two groups were matched for gender, deformity, degree of arthritis, and surgical approach. Reliability of the new extramedullary set of instruments was first tested in ten cadaveric limbs. Preoperative long weight-bearing AP and lateral view of the knee were obtained taking care of neutral limb positioning. Template of the mechanical and anatomical axis were performed. Distal femoral resection was planned according to the template, and considering a bone cut perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. Measurement from the template were reproduced on the distal femoral cutting jig. Flexion-extension control of the distal femoral resection was obtained using the anterior meta-diaphyseal cortex reference. Depth of resection, and varus-valgus angulation were selected according to the previous measurements and referring over the most prominent distal femoral condyle. A double check was performed using an extra-medullary rod referring two and a half finger-breaths medially to the antero-superior iliac spine. Postoperative blood loss, pain, swelling, functional recovery, and complications were recorded. Radiographic alignment was measured with long film. Mechanical axis was within 0±2° in 88% of group 1 and 84% of group 2 (p> 0.05). There were no difference between the two groups regarding the operative time. In group 1, postoperative blood loss (740 vs 820 mL) was reduced but this difference did not reach the statistical significance (p=0.07). No difference was found in terms of postoperative pain, knee swelling, and functional recovery. Extramedullary reference with careful preoperative templating can be safely utilized during total knee arthroplasty. Avoiding the violation of the femoral canal may enhance the benefits of a less invasive approach.

Aim: To test the accuracy of implant positioning in using computer navigation in Resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Materials and methods: Brain Lab was used to register 13 cadavers. The component position was fine tuned to a desirable valgus angle. Wire was passed using navigation. The femoral heads were sectioned after insertion of the prosthesis. The measurements from the screen-shots and the transverse sections were analysed using AutoCad®. Results: The Brain lab Registered the femoral heads to 124.91° ± 14.25° (Range 97° −148° ) CCD. The actual neck shaft angles were 126.11° ± 5.33°. The implants were placed in an angulation’s of 131.46° ± 5.27 ° (Range 116° −137° ) and a version of −0.85° ± 2.1° this gave a valgus of 5.91° ± 13.66°. The position of the wire in the isthmus of the neck was −0.52 mm ± 0.69 mm inferior to the centre and 1.7mm ± 1.9 mm posterior to the centre on the transverse sections (n=6). The components were in 8.69° ± 4.95° (n= 6) valgus to the native neck shaft angle. In only 1 hip the femoral head implanted was of the same size as suggested by navigation, in all the rest of the hips the femoral component was of a larger size. This was because it was felt that implanting a smaller size would cause notching of the superolateral neck. Conclusion: There is a learning curve involved for registering the femoral heads using computer navigation systems, however the navigation gives the surgeon a distinct advantage of being able to choose the point of entry, implant the prosthesis in as valgus position as possible in relation to the femoral head, translate the implant anteriorly and place the peg in the centre of the femoral neck in both the planes. The computer-aided navigation can optimise the component positioning and thereby provide excellent results

Aim: To test the accuracy of implant positioning in using computer navigation in Resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Materials and methods: Brain Lab was used to register 13 cadavers. The component position was fine tuned to a desirable valgus angle. Wire was passed using navigation. The femoral heads were sectioned after insertion of the prosthesis. The measurements from the screenshots and the transverse sections were analysed using AutoCad. Results: The Brain lab Registered the femoral heads to 124.91° ± 14.25° (Range 97°–148° ) CCD. The actual neck shaft angles were 126.11° ± 5.33°. The implants were placed in an angulation’s of 131.46° ± 5.27 ° (Range 116° –137° ) and a version of –0.85° ± 2.1° this gave a valgus of 5.91° ± 13.66°. The position of the wire in the isthmus of the neck was –0.52 mm ± 0.69 mm inferior to the centre and 1.7mm ± 1.9 mm posterior to the centre on the transverse sections (n=6). The components were in 8.69° ± 4.95° (n= 6) valgus to the native neck shaft angle. In only 1 hip the femoral head implanted was of the same size as suggested by navigation, in all the rest of the hips the femoral component was of a larger size. This was because it was felt that implanting a smaller size would cause notching of the supero-lateral neck. Conclusion: There is a learning curve involved for registering the femoral heads using computer navigation systems, however the navigation gives the surgeon a distinct advantage of being able to choose the point of entry, implant the prosthesis in as valgus position as possible in relation to the femoral head, translate the implant anteriorly and place the peg in the centre of the femoral neck in both the planes. The computer-aided navigation can optimise the component positioning and thereby provide excellent results

Over the last two decades, anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions have gained popularity, while the use of extraarticular reconstructions has decreased. However, the biomechanical rationale behind the lateral extraarticular sling has not been adequately studied. By understanding its effect on knee stability, it may be possible to identify specific situations in which lateral extraarticular tenodesis may be advantageous. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the ability of a lateral extraarticular sling to restore native kinematics to the ACL deficient knee, with and without combined intraarticular anatomic ACL reconstruction. Additionally, we aimed to characterise the isometry of four possible femoral tunnel positions for the lateral extraarticular sling.

Eight fresh frozen hip-to-toe cadavers were used in this study. Navigated Lachman and mechanised pivot shift examinations were performed on ACL itact and deficient knees. Three reconstruction strategies were evaluated: Single bundle anatomic intraarticular ACL reconstruction, Lateral extraarticular sling, Combined intraarticular ACL reconstruction and lateral extraarticular sling. After all stability tests were completed, we quantified the isometry of four possible femoral tunnel positions for the lateral extraarticular sling using the Surgetics navigation system. A single tibial tunnel position was identified and digitised over Gerdy's tubercle. Four possible graft positions were identified on the lateral femoral condyle: the top of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL); the top of the septum; the ideal tunnel position, as defined by the navigation system's own algorithm; and the actual tunnel position used during testing, described in the literature as the intersection of the linear projections of the LCL and the septum over the lateral femoral condyle. For each of the four tunnel positions, the knee was cycled from 0 to 90® of flexion and fiber length was recorded at 30® intervals, therefore quantiying the magnitude of anisometry for each tunnel position.

Stability testing: Sectioning of the ACL resulted in an increase in Lachman (15mm, p = 0.01) and mechanised pivot shift examination (6.75mm, p = 0.04) in all specimens compared with the intact knee. Anatomic intraarticular ACL reconstruction restored the Lachman (6.7mm, p = 3.76) and pivot shift (−3.5mm, p = 0.85) to the intact state. With lateral extraarticular sling alone, there was a trend towards increased anterior translation with the Lachman test (9.2mm, p = 0.50). This reconstruction restored the pivot shift to the intact state. (1.25mm, p = 0.73). Combined intraarticular and extraarticular reconstruction restored the Lachman (6.2mm, p = 2.11) and pivot shift (−3.75mm, p = 0.41) to the intact state. There was no significant difference between intraarticular alone and combined intraarticular and extraarticular reconstruction. (p = 1.88)

Isometry: The ideal tunnel position calculated by the navigation system was identified over the lateral femoral condyle, beneath the mid-portion of the LCL. The anisometry for the ideal tunnel position was significantly lower (5.9mm; SD = 1.8mm; P<0.05) than the anisometry of the actual graft position (14.9mm; SD = 4mm), the top of the LCL (13.9mm; SD = 4.3mm) and the top of the septum (12mm; SD = 2.4mm).

In the isolated acute ACL deficient knee, the addition of a lateral extraarticular sling to anatomic intraarticular ACL reconstruction provides little biomechanical advantage and is not routinely recommended. Isolated lateral extraarticular sling does control the pivot shift, and may be an option in the revision setting or in the lower demand patient with functional instability. Additionally, the location of the femoral tunnel traditionally used results in a significantly more anisometric graft than the navigation's system mathematical ideal location. However, the location of this ideal tunnel placement lies beneath mid-portion of the fibers of the LCL, which would not be clinically feasible.

Tibial and femoral loosening are major causes for implant failure in total knee arthroplasty. Jefferey (1991) reported a significantly lower rate of loosening when varus or valgus was within 3 degrees of mechanical axis in an eight year follow up. Coulle (Dec1999) reported 48% unacceptable alignment in non-navigated knees and Reed (Aug 2002) reported 35% alignments deviating more than 3 degrees from mechanical axis when navigation was not used.

We report our series of 286 navigated knee replacements using the Aesculap Search system (21 cases) and the Aesculap e-motion versions 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 (265 cases) between April 2003 and December 2012 by the author (A.D) and analysed the correction achieved against the zero mechanical axis. Postoperative measurement of the angles on long length films was done in 23 cases. This matched with the intraoperative corrections achieved as studied using per-operative computer data stored for every case. We continued to use the data stored in the AESCULAP System to correlate the findings in the rest of the cases. The average mechanical axis achieved was 1.3 degrees. All cases had mechanical axes within 3 degrees.

We were thus able to achieve a high level of correction of the mechanical axes predictable to achieve better clinical outcomes.

Hypothesis. Custom cutting blocks can produce similar alignment compared to computer navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) techniques. Method. We conducted a retrospective review of 37 patients who underwent TKA by a single surgeon in a teaching hospital setting. Groups were conventional method (10), computer assisted navigation (10), and custom blocks (18). The custom group was further subdivided to CT and MRI based blocks. Post-operative alignment was measured (blinded) using full length weight bearing radiographs at 18 weeks on average. Hospital records were reviewed to determine operative time, transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, complications and cost. Results. Post-operative mechanical axis was within 3 degrees of neutral in 100% of the navigation group, 70% of the conventional group and 50% of the custom block group. Average alignment was within 1.8, 3.1 and 3.6 degrees of neutral for each group respectively. The operative time was greater for the computer navigation group (86.7 min) compared to the conventional (72.1) and MRI custom block groups which involved unfamiliar instrumentation (73.8). CT based block procedures involved otherwise familiar instruments and averaged 61.2 minutes. Length of hospital stay and complications were similar for all three groups. Total cost was the least for the conventional group. Increased costs were associated with computer equipment, pre-operative advanced imaging and custom blocks. Conclusions. Custom cutting blocks in this small series obtain worse radiographic positioning of total knee arthroplasty components compared to conventional and computer navigation techniques. Further studies with greater number of patients, CT alignment analysis and long-term follow-up are required

Several authors have reported that Computer-Assisted Surgery (CAS) can improve limb and prosthesis alignment and ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and permit the use of a less invasive surgical procedure. This can have a positive impact on the time of recovery of patients. In order to evaluate the real impact on the final outcome of CAS in TKA, we conducted a prospective control study comparing the outcome of computer-assisted and conventional TKAs.

We analyzed 60 primary TKAs, randomly divided into two cohorts -group 1 = STD (standard instrumentation) and group 2 = CAS -over three consecutive years. Both cohorts included 30 cases, all affected by primary knee osteoarthritis. The same model of prosthesis was implanted in all cases, by one surgeon, using the same surgical technique. Two patients were bilateral: in both cases one side was treated with standard instrumentation and the other with CAS. We conducted a clinical evaluation at the pre-operative moment and at the consecutive Follow-Up (FU), using the American Knee Society Score (AKSS). We scored patient satisfaction using the Oxford and the Ranawat Center questionnaire. We also recorded the main intra-operative data, such as total blood loss, surgical time, tourniquet time, Range of Motion (ROM). Finally, we performed a radiological study analyzing the pre-operative and consecutive FU radiographs to obtain a quantitative evaluation of limb and prosthesis alignment.

The intra-operative blood loss was higher in patients of group STD, with an average difference of 127 ml, statistically significant (p = 0.0283). Component position was acceptable for all implants, but the mechanical axe error of the CAS group was (1.00 +/−0.20) degrees, significantly less than that of the STD group (2.10 +/−0.50) degrees. The mean coronal femoral alignment was 90.00 degrees (range, 89 −92 degrees) in the CAS group, and 91.00 degrees (range, 88 −93 degrees) in the STD group. The operating time of the CAS group was longer than that of the STD group, with an average time difference of 26 minutes, statistically significant [ P = 0.005]. The AKSS and the Oxford and the Ranawat Center questionnaire analysis revealed a faster rehabilitation and an earlier return to daily life activities in the CAS group, independent of the preoperative level of disability.

We conclude that the use of navigation in TKA increases accuracy in limb and implant alignment and improves the rehabilitation phase. By achieving more reliable artificial joint implantation, CAS can improve prosthesis duration and joint function. It, however, needs more operating time.

Computer assisted navigation (CAN) has been shown to significantly improve the overall alignment obtained after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Human error and the use of conventional jigs may be the reasons for the inaccuracy of conventional TKA. The impact of computer assisted equipment in surgeon training has not yet been established. Three orthopaedic trainees participated in this prospective study to assess the impact of CAN upon intraoperative alignment. Each trainee’s first five (early group) and last five (late group) TKA’s were included in the study during their three month training period. A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The accuracy of conventional jig positioning was assessed simultaneously using navigation equipment. After this assessment, the actual bony resection was performed using CAN equipment. There was a consistent trend towards improved accuracy between the early and late groups in the majority of parameters assessed. In the early group, the coronal plane tibial alignment was found to be outside the acceptable three degree range in 11 out of 15. In the late group this improved to two out of 15 (p< 0.05). An average of 2.8 degrees of tibial jig deviation during pinning was noted in the early group which improved to one degree in late group. The accuracy of jig placement in both groups was improved by CAN. Computer assisted navigation is helpful in improving the accuracy of trainee surgeons and should prove a useful adjunct in training. Surgical accuracy using conventional jig based systems can be improved with training. Deviation of conventional tibial alignment jig during pinning is a significant factor. This aspect has not been appreciated fully in the past and can be minimised by the use of the navigation equipment. As shown in previous studies, the overall alignment using CAN is superior to what would have been obtained using conventional jigs for TKA

Introduction:

Efforts continue to reduce blood loss in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Computer assisted surgery (CAS) has been shown to reduce outliers in component position and improve functional outcomes in TKA, yet few studies have reported specifically on blood loss. The primary study objective was to determine whether a modern abbreviated CAS protocol would reduce blood loss in TKA compared to conventional instrumentation. A secondary objective was to assess the effect of CAS on cost and surgical efficiency.

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty has become an increasingly common procedure. Improper cup position contributes to bearing surface wear, pelvic osteolysis, dislocations, and revision surgery. The incidence of cup malposition outside of the safe zone (40° ± 10° abduction and 15° ± 10° anteversion) using traditional techniques has been reported to be as high as 50%. Our hypothesis is that computer assisted navigation will improve cup placement in total hip arthroplasty compared with traditional techniques. Methods. This study retrospectively evaluated the position of 425 consecutive cups placed during primary total hip arthroplasty performed over a two-year period, from 8/1/2012 to 8/1/2014. All cups were placed with a direct-anterior muscle-sparing approach with computer-assisted imageless navigation by a single surgeon. Real-time intraoperative “screen shots” were taken of cup placement. Standard antero-posterior postoperative radiographs of the pelvis were taken within 6 weeks of surgery in the operating surgeon's office using the same standardized protocol for each patient. The radiographs were evaluated by two separate investigators for final abduction and anteversion utilizing the same method as other studies. Statistics were descriptive in nature. Results. Intraoperative navigation screenshots from 425 hips showed that 100% were within the safe zone for abduction and anteversion. Postoperative radiographic review showed that 97% were within the safe zone for abduction (Mean 41 degrees, Range 29–54 degrees), 96% were within the safe zone for anteversion (Mean 16 degrees, Range 4–38 degrees) and 94% were within the safe zone for both abduction and anteversion. Conclusion. In our series, computer assisted navigation improved cup placement in total hip arthroplasty compared with traditional techniques as reported in current literature. Cup position in our study, was within the safe zone for abduction and version at a comparable rate to similar studies examining THA's performed with navigation

Background: Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery continues to evolve. Electromagnetic Computer Navigation has recently emerged as a new modality of CAOS that promises increased accuracy, as well as increased portability and practicality. However, there are very few studies examining this new technique and comparing it to conventional TKJR. Methods: We carried out a prospective randomised study comparing the conventional jig-based technique of TKJR versus EM navigation (Medtronic). We examined parameters such as surgical time, blood loss, days in hospital post operatively, and complication rate. Further, we assessed the accuracy of the two techniques with the CT Scan “Perth Protocol”. Parameters measured included femoral component flexion, extension, alignment and rotation, tibial alignment, posterior slope and femorotibial mismatch. Results: Mean Oxford Knee Score was 47.5; the mean age was 70 (67–74). 43% were female and 57% male. Half were navigated and half conventional. The mean Hb change in 48 hours, as a reflection of blood loss was 14.5% for the conventional group and 14.25% for the navigated group. Mean Surgical Time for the conventional group was 90 minutes and the navigated was 120 minutes. The average stay in hospital for both groups was 5 days after the operation. The measurements according to the Perth Protocol suggested increased accuracy in femoral alignment, posterior slope, and reduced femorotibial mismatch. Femoral rotation was not significantly different and femoral flexion extension was not significantly different. The only major complication occurred in the navigated group with a dislocated knee in a patient afflicted with multiple sclerosis. Summary: These preliminary results suggest that EM navigation is a safe and accurate technique. It has the additional advantage of portability and increased user friendliness compared to other navigation methods. When compared to conventional jig-based techniques, it is more accurate, increases surgical time by an average 30 minutes, there is no significant difference in blood loss at 48 hours, patient’s stay in hospital is not prolonged and the rate of complications does not exceed that of conventional surgery. Electromagnetic Navigation is in its infancy, and the authors feel that surgical time and accuracy will improve with more frequent use and the development of increasingly more sophisticated software packages. Our study continues

The Vector Vision CT free navigation system of Brain-Lab (Heimstetten, Germany) for total knee arthroplasty incorporates a ligament balancing feature which allows recording of flexion extension gaps and clinical alignment [3]. Since routine spacer blocks do not necessarily load the joint space symmetrically, if either the bone cuts are asymmetric or the ligaments are not evenly balanced, a tensioning device that applies a constant load to the medial and lateral joint space separately and which can collapse or expand on each side independently should be able to provide a better evaluation of ligament tension and allow the computer software to better plan the appropriate bone cuts or ligament release. The tensioning device comprises 2 linked plates contacting the femur and tibia separated by two independent springs in the medial and lateral compartments. It can be positioned precisely in the joint with the navigation system and, with respect to spacer blocks, this device was designed in order to allow a dynamic evaluation of joint stiffness during all range of motion and, thanks to it’s reduced dimensions, with patella in situ. The springs apply a consistent known force on the compartments, while at the same time the gap produced by the applied forces is measured by the navigation. This study integrates previous article [1] on the validation of the tensioning device and reports the first phase of the clinical validation of the tensioning device, including first qualitative comparison with standard navigated technique and consideration on the use of the device. A spring loaded mechanical device was designed with a constant 6kg load in the springs for each compartment. For the clinical evaluation, the device was inserted into flexion and extension spaces after the tibial cut was performed in routine computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. The gap produced by the applied forces is measured, by the navigation system, as the distance between tibial cut and most distal points on condyles in extension or most posterior points on condyles in flexion. Under the same conditions a set of solid spacer blocks were inserted to obtain a gap able to balance the knee according to surgeon’s sensitivity. This gap was used as reference and compared with the gap obtained with the spring device. The clinical evaluation was performed in order to determine whether there was a difference between the gaps as indicated by both the tensioning device and the spacer blocks. Five experienced orthopaedic surgeons were involved in a randomized study producing 58 complete data sets. Eight measurements (medial and lateral gap, in flexion and extension for tensioning device and spacer blocks) were taken intra-operatively using the ligament balancing features of the VectorVision system. Because many of the measurements were not normally distributed, nonparametric statistical tests (Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon) were chosen to look for statistical differences, looking for differences in medians and ranking of data instead of differences in averages and distributions. Repeatability of measurements performed with the spring device was defined as the occurrence of same values obtained with the device and by surgeons with spacer blocks. Since the uncertainty in the measurements, due to optical navigation system is near, differences within a range of ±1mm were considered the same value, moreover data within a range of ±2mm were considered a positive result. This data was analyzed with Minitab software version 13.31. Results are reported in Tab.1. Results: extension Flexion compartment Medial lateral medial lateral average difference 0.2 (±2.5 mm) 0.0 (±3.6 mm) 1.3 (±2.1 mm) 1.4 (±2.5 mm) number of cases 57 100 57 100 57 100 57 100 median ±1mm 30 52.6 24 42.1 34 59.6 23 40.4 median ±2mm 43 75.4 36 63.2 47 82.5 36 63.2 Table.1. Average difference between gaps obtained with tensioning device and spacer blocks, and related occurrences in medial\lateral compartments inflexion and extension. Difference between the tensioning device and the spacer blocks in flexion is 0.2mm medially and 0.0mm laterally, while in flexion it is 1.3mm medially and 1.6mm laterally, moreover the alignments of resulting femoral cuts obtained with spring device can be considered the same of the alignments obtained with spacer blocks (difference is < 1°). Data, summarized in Tab.1, highlight that knee has a different behaviour in flexion and extension. Applying the same force with the tensioning device the resulting gap in extension (10mm medial, 10.5mm lateral) is lower than the one flexion (10.5mm medial, 12.5 lateral). The percentage of values around the average in the range of 1mm is 52.6% – 59.6% medially and 40.4% – 42.1% laterally, showing a higher variability on lateral compartment, while the percentage of values in a range of 2mm is75.4% – 82.5% medially and 63.2% laterally, confirming the variability. Determining the soft tissue balance in total knee replacement is important to proper reconstruction. Traditional spacer blocks are unable to load the medial and lateral joint space independently which may compromise the surgical plan. A tensioning device which loads the-joint space independently with a constant load should theoretically allow proper planning of the bone resections and ligament releases during reconstructive surgery. The spring loaded tensor device coupled with image navigation and compared to independent spacer blocks performed by different surgeons revealed that there is no statistical difference between the gaps obtained with spacer blocks and tensioning device in extension, while in flexion there is an average difference 1.4mm, it revealed also that there was greater surgeon variability in the use of spacer blocks compared to the tensioning device. Furthermore, the device produced results that were similar to the results obtained by the spacer blocks especially when surgeon’s variation in technique was taken into account. The use of a joint tensioning device, coupled with computer assisted surgery, allows planning appropriate bone resection and ligament releases to produce matched medial and lateral joint spaces in flexion and extension. There were no reports, either inter-operatively or post-operatively, of any complications or adverse events nor any malfunctions of the device. On a number of occasions it was felt necessary to perform additional bone resections to allow the insertion of the spring device. However this should be considered as a normal part of TKA and of the inter-operative decision making process. This data also revealed, as would be expected clinically that the joint space is less in extension than in flexion after the tibial cut is performed [3]; surgeons with the help of spacer blocks apply less force in flexion in order to obtain the same gap during range of motion, the spring device, applying always the same force, is opening the joint more in flexion. Furthermore, when evaluating the lateral joint space, the tensioning device has a greater variability than the spacer blocks [4]. In this series of patients, a spring loaded tension device decreased surgeon variability in the assessment of ligament tension and, when coupled with computer navigation, allowed the surgeons to appropriately plan the femoral resection to create balanced flexion and extension spaces

Despite the well-documented improvement in coronal alignment achieved by computer assisted navigation, varying results have been reported for sagittal alignment. Current navigation systems rely on a sagittal femoral mechanical axis identified by the navigation system, but little information is available on the relationship between the sagittal mechanical axis and anatomical axes for intra-operative or postoperative radiographic assessments. We asked whether deviations exist between sagittal femoral mechanical axis and anatomical axes and attempted to identify predictors of the deviations found. In 100 consecutive patients (200 knees) undergoing TKA, angles between two anatomical axes (the anterior cortical line and mid-medullary line) and two sagittal mechanical axes identified by current navigation systems were measured as proxies of the deviations between them on true lateral radiographs of the whole femur. Correlation analyses and multivariate regression were carried out to identify predictors of deviations. Significant deviations existed with wide ranges between the anatomical axes and the sagittal mechanical axes. Degree of femoral bowing and femoral length were found to be predictors of deviations between sagittal femoral mechanical axes and anatomical axes. This study suggests that surgeons applying navigation technology to TKA need to consider deviations between the sagittal femoral mechanical axes and anatomical axes when they intend to place a femoral component at a target sagittal orientation with respect to an anatomical reference