Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A1215. EFFICACY OF COMPUTER NAVIGATION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become one of the most successful procedures in orthopedics, and its survival rates are reportedly greater than 90% after 15 years.

Malpositioning of the component, however, can lead to various failures, such as aseptic loosening, instability, polyethylene wear, and patellar dislocation. Navigation systems for TKA have been developed to improve postoperative alignment. Many clinical and experimental studies of these navigation systems have shown that the accuracy of implanted components has improved.

We have compared the alignment of 150 total knee replacements implanted using a computed tomography-based navigation system and using the conventional alignment guide system when performed by a single surgeon. The knees were evaluated using full-length weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs and computed tomography scans. For the navigated group, the average hip-knee-ankle angle, the femoral component angle to the femoral mechanical axis, and the tibial component angle to the mechanical tibial axis were 179.5, 89.4 and 89.7 degrees. The rotational femoral and tibial component angles to the planning axis were 0.6 and 0.3 degrees. The ideal angles of all alignments in the navigated group were obtained at significantly higher rates than in the conventional group. Our results demonstrated significant improvements in component positioning with CT-based navigation system, especially with respect to rotational alignment.

Recently, we established a new method for 3D reconstruction from postoperative CT images in order to accurately measure the alignment of the component relative to any designed plane. The results showed that the discrepancy between the two-dimensional and three-dimensional evaluations was 0.3 ± 1.8 (−2.7–3.4) degrees.

The coronal femoral angle for 36 knees (97.3%) and the coronal tibial angle for all the 37 knees (100%) were obtained within 3 degrees from the optimal angle. It is possible to measure the postoperative alignment for TKA more accurately on the basis of the defining plane. Three-dimensional analysis is necessary to evaluate the accuracy of the navigation system.

We conclude that navigation system is a very useful tool for achieving proper postoperative alignment. Controversy still exists regarding accuracy in rotational alignment with image-free navigation, but our results showed that CT-based system significantly improved accuracy of rotational alignment. We should keep using and improving the systems to establish more simplified and accurate systems.

Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net