We examined the differences in post-operative functional disability and patient satisfaction between 56 patients who underwent a lumbar fusion at three or more levels for degenerative disease (group I) and 69 patients, matched by age and gender, who had undergone a one or two level fusion (group II). Their mean age was 66 years (49 to 84) and the mean follow-up was 43 months (24 to 65). The mean pre-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and the mean post-operative VAS were similar in both groups (p >  0.05), but post-operatively the improvement in ODI was significantly less in group I (40.6%) than in group II (49.5%) (p < 0.001). Of the ten ODI items, patients in group I showed significant problems with lifting, sitting, standing, and travelling (p < 0.05). The most significant differences in the post-operative ODI were observed between patients who had undergone fusion at four or more levels and those who had undergone fusion at less than four levels (p = 0.005). The proportion of patients who were satisfied with their operations was similar in groups I and II (72.7% and 77.0%, respectively) (p = 0.668). The mean number of fused levels was associated with the post-operative ODI (r = 0.266, p = 0.003), but not with the post-operative VAS or satisfaction grade (p > 0.05). Post-operative functional disability was more severe in those with a long-level lumbar fusion, particularly at four or more levels, but patient satisfaction remained similar for those with both long- and short-level fusions

Introduction: We undertook an audit study to find out patient perception of being seen by a nurse practitioner in the clinic for a follow up appointment instead of a consultant and satisfaction with the joint clinic.

Methods and materials: 100 patients were surveyed following their post-operation review with the nurse. Data was collected prospectively over a period of 6 months. Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire on the day of their appointment and to hand the survey prior to leaving. Hence we had 100% response rate.

Results: Majority of the respondents were female (61%) with 50 % having had total hip replacements and the rest had knee replacements. 99% of respondents (94/95) felt that enough time was spent with them during the appointment. All respondents (100%) reported that they were able to ask questions and were answered satisfactorily. The consultant saw 26% of respondents; further 6% was seen by a registrar and the rest 68% were seen by the nurse specialist. Reasons for being seen by a doctor included check up or assessment, reviewing stitches and infection. 42% of respondents (33/79) were referred for further treatment either by the consultant (33%), nurse (64%) or registrar (3%). Reasons for further treatment included physiotherapy, plaster room, and further follow up (check up) appointment at 3–6 months to review the patient following surgery. 100% of respondents (97/97) were satisfied with the combined consultant/nurse clinic. 3 did not record their response. The vast majority of respondents (80%, 79/99) reported that they ‘don’t mind’ who they would have been seen by in the clinic.

Discussion: The results indicate that patients are satisfied with the current clinic arrangements i.e. nurse-led clinic with the consultant being available. Hence there is a definite role for nurse led clinics for joint replacement surgery follow-ups.

Aims. We introduced a self-care pathway for minimally displaced distal radius fractures, which involved the patient being discharged from a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) without a physical review and being provided with written instructions on how to remove their own cast or splint at home, plus advice on exercises and return to function. Methods. All patients managed via this protocol between March and October 2020 were contacted by a medical secretary at a minimum of six months post-injury. The patients were asked to complete the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), a satisfaction questionnaire, advise if they had required surgery and/or contacted any health professional, and were also asked for any recommendations on how to improve the service. A review with a hand surgeon was organized if required, and a cost analysis was also conducted. Results. Overall 71/101 patients completed the telephone consultation; no patients required surgery, and the mean and median PRWE scores were 23.9/100 (SD 24.9) and 17.0/100 (interquartile range (IQR) 0 to 40), respectively. Mean patient satisfaction with treatment was 34.3/40 (SD 9.2), and 65 patients (92%) were satisfied or highly satisfied. In total there were 16 contact calls, 12 requests for a consultant review, no formal complaints, and 15 minor adjustment suggestions to improve patient experience. A relationship was found between intra-articular injuries and lower patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.025), however no relationship was found between PRWE scores and the nature of the fracture. Also, no relationship was found between the type of immobilization and the functional outcome or patient satisfaction. Cost analysis of the self-care pathway V traditional pathway showed a cost savings of over £13,500 per year with the new self-care model compared to the traditional model. Conclusion. Our study supports a VFC self-care pathway for patients with minimally displaced distal radius fractures. The pathway provides a good level of patient satisfaction and function. To improve the service, we will make minor amendments to our patient information sheet. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):726–732

In the field of hand surgery, physicians are working to improve patient satisfaction by offering several minor procedures in the physician's office via the WALANT method. We seek to investigate the degree of patient satisfaction, out of pocket cost, convenience and comfort experienced with in-office hand procedures. A ten question survey consisting of a ten-point Likert scale of agreement and questions asking for a numerical answer was administered via phone call to 33 patients treated with minor hand operations in the office setting in the United States. There were 18 male and 15 female respondents with an average age of 65.59±12.64 years. Respondents underwent procedures including trigger finger release (18), needle aponeurotomy (7), and other minor hand operations. Survey responses indicated strong agreement with questions 1-3 and 6–8, with responses averaging 9.60±0.23 in these positive metrics. Questions 4 and 5, which asked whether the surgery and recovery period were painful, respectively, averaged 2.65±0.49, indicating a mild level of disagreement that either was “painful”. Additionally, most patients responded that they did not take time off work (12) or are not currently employed (11). Other respondents (3) reported taking between one to five days off work post-operatively. 27 respondents also reported an out of pocket cost averaging $382±$976, depending on insurance coverage. Patients reported a small degree of pain in the operative and post-operative period, a high degree of comfort and convenience and a high degree of satisfaction. Likewise, the patient-reported out of pocket cost was far lower than comparable surgical costs in alternate settings. These results support the use of in-office procedures for minor hand surgeries from a patient perspective and indicate a nearly universal intent to repeat any future hand operations in the office setting

Ten to twenty percent of patients are dissatisfied with the clinical result after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Aim of this study was to investigate the impact of personality traits on patient satisfaction and subjective outcome of TKA. We investigated 80 patients with 86 computer navigated TKAs (Emotion®, B Braun Aesculap) and asked for patient satisfaction. We divided patients into two groups (satisfied or dissatisfied). 12 personality traits were tested by an independent psychologist, using the Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI-R). Postoperative examination included Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Radiologic investigation was done in all patients. 84% of our patients were satisfied, while 16% were not satisfied with clinical outcome. The FPI-R showed statistically significant influence of four personality traits on patient satisfaction: life satisfaction (ρ = 0.006), performance orientation (ρ =0.015), somatic distress (ρ = 0.001), and emotional stability (ρ = 0.002). All clinical scores (VAS, WOMAC, and KSS) showed significant better results in the satisfied patient group. Radiological examination showed optimal alignment of all TKAs. There were no complications requiring revision surgery in both groups. The results of our study show that personality traits may influence patient satisfaction and clinical outcome after TKA. Thus, patients personality traits may be a useful predictive factor for postoperative satisfaction after TKA

Aims. Alternative alignment concepts, including kinematic and restricted kinematic, have been introduced to help improve clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results, along with patient satisfaction, following TKA using the concept of restricted kinematic alignment. Methods. A total of 121 consecutive TKAs performed between 11 February 2018 to 11 June 2019 with preoperative varus deformity were reviewed at minimum one-year follow-up. Three knees were excluded due to severe preoperative varus deformity greater than 15°, and a further three due to requiring revision surgery, leaving 109 patients and 115 knees to undergo primary TKA using the concept of restricted kinematic alignment with advanced technology. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the preoperative limb varus deformity: Group A with 1° to 5° varus (43 knees); Group B between 6° and 10° varus (56 knees); and Group C with varus greater than 10° (16 knees). This study group was compared with a matched cohort of 115 TKAs and 115 patients using a neutral mechanical alignment target with manual instruments performed from 24 October 2016 to 14 January 2019. Results. Mean overall patient satisfaction for the entire cohort was 4.7 (SE 0.1) on a 5-point Likert scale, with 93% being either very satisfied or satisfied compared with a Likert of 4.3 and patient satisfaction of 81% in the mechanical alignment group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.006 respectively). At mean follow-up of 17 months (11 to 27), the mean overall Likert, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score, and Knee Society Knee and Function Scores were significantly better in the kinematic group than in the neutral mechanical alignment group. The most common complication in both groups was contracture requiring manipulation under anaesthesia, involving seven knees (6.1%) in the kinematic group and nine knees (7.8%) in the mechanical alignment group. Conclusion. With the advent of advanced technology, and the ability to obtain accurate bone cuts, the target limb alignment, and soft-tissue balance within millimetres, using a restricted kinematic alignment concept demonstrated excellent patient satisfaction following primary TKA. Longer-term analysis is required as to the durability of this method. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):59–66

Complications such as implant loosening, infection, periprosthetic fracture or instability may lead to revision arthroplasty procedures. There is limited literature comparing single-stage and two-stage revision shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and cost benefit between single-stage and two-stage revision procedures. Thirty-one revision procedures (mean age 72+/-7, 15 males and 16 females) performed between 2016 and 2021 were included (27 revision RSA, 2 revision TSA, 2 failed ORIFs). Two-stage procedures were carried out 4-6 weeks apart. Single-stage procedures included debridement, implant removal and washout, followed by re-prep, re-drape and reconstruction with new instrumentations. Clinical parameters including length of stay, VAS, patient satisfaction was recorded preoperatively and at mean 12-months follow up. Cost benefit analysis were performed. Seven revisions were two-stage procedures and 24 were single-stage procedures. There were 5 infections in the two-stage group vs 14 in the single-stage group. We noted two cases of unstable RSA and 8 other causes for single-stage revision. Majority of the revisions were complex procedures requiring significant glenoid and/or humeral allografts and tendon transfers to compensate for soft tissue loss. No custom implants were used in our series. Hospital stay was reduced from 41+/-29 days for 2-stage procedures to 16+/-13 days for single-stage (p<0.05). VAS improved from 9+/-1 to 2+/-4 for two-stage procedures and from 5+/-3 to 1+/-2 for single-stages. The average total cost of hospital and patient was reduced by two-thirds. Patient satisfaction in the single-stage group was 43% which was comparable to the two-stage group. All infections were successfully treated with no recurrence of infection in our cohort of 31 patients. There was no instability postoperatively. 3 patients had postoperative neural symptoms which resolved within 6 months. Single-stage procedures for revision shoulder arthroplasty significantly decrease hospital stay, improve patients’ satisfaction, and reduced surgical costs

Background. NHS improvement advocates same day emergency care (SDEC) for patients requiring additional specialism than can be provided in an Emergency Department. A novel physiotherapist-led spinal SDEC unit was established in January 2020, integrated within the on-call spinal service. The aim of this paper was to evaluate patient and peer satisfaction with the spinal SDEC. Methods. Patient satisfaction questionnaires and/or friends and family tests were collected from patients over a six-month period. Questionnaires evaluated satisfaction with recommendations given, service given, staff friendliness. Anonymous, completed questionnaires were uploaded onto a spreadsheet. Peer satisfaction was assessed using a google sheets document emailed to interface, primary care and community services. The questionnaire captured the respondents’ role, how many patients they had referred to the SDEC, reasons for referral, ease of referral, and compared this new pathway with the previous pathway. All patient's satisfaction responses recommended the service to family and friends (n=110 extremely likely, 8 likely) (6% total seen). All respondents were satisfied with the service they received (n=80 very satisfied, n=12 satisfied) and recommendations made (n=86 very satisfied, n=6 satisfied). Of peer satisfaction, 26 respondents (n=12 (46%) physiotherapists, n=6 (23%) first contact practitioners, n=6 (23%) advanced practice physiotherapists, n=1 (4%) GP, n=1 (4%) nurse) reported the SDEC delivered a better pathway and outcomes (n=25, 96%), and 20 (77%) respondents reported favourable comments of the service and its impact on patients and referrers. Conclusion. Peer and patient satisfaction data support the use of a physiotherapist-led spinal SDEC in emergency and urgent spinal care pathways. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of Interest. Sources of interest: No sources of funding

Introduction. Mechanical axis limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated excellent long-term survivorship; however, patient satisfaction continues to demand improvement. Alternative emerging alignment concepts including kinematic and tibial constitutional varus have been introduced but remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and patient satisfaction following TKA with tibial components placed in constitutional varus alignment. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort analysis from a total joint registry of 114 patients with preoperative varus deformity who underwent primary TKA with tibial component placed in 1–3 degrees of constitutional varus. The group included 59 males (52%) and 55 (48%) females with a mean age of 67 years (range 43 – 85) and mean BMI of 32.0 kg/m. 2. (range 21 – 51 kg/m. 2. ) with a minimum 1 year follow-up. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the preoperative varus alignment: Group A between 1°- 5° varus (43 knees), Group B between 6°- 10° (56 knees), and Group C greater than 10° (16 knees). The target constitutional tibial varus alignment was selected based on the extent of the patient's deformity. Results. The average overall patient satisfaction was 4.7 on a 5-point Likert scale with 93% being either very satisfied or satisfied. Group A had the highest overall patient satisfaction of 95% followed by Group B (93%) and Group C (88%). Mean Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) for the combined groups was 86, mean KOOS Jr. score 72, mean WOMAC score 90, mean Knee Society (KS) Knee Score 93 and mean KS Function Score was 85. Conclusion. The push for more patient centered outcome measures drives the pursuit of improving patient satisfaction in addition to traditional outcome measures. Tibial components placed in constitutional varus in this study demonstrated excellent patient satisfaction and improvement in knee function following TKA

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered as one of the most successful and cost-effective medical interventions yet it is consistently reported that up to 20% of patients are dissatisfied with their outcomes. Patient satisfaction is correlated with the fulfillment of expectations and an important aspect of this involves good surgeon-patient communication, which itself is a contributor to TKA satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a checklist intended to enhance the quality of surgeon-patient communication by optimizing the surgeon's role in helping patients set (or reset) and manage post-TKA expectations that are realistic, achievable, and most importantly, patient-specific. In this prospective mixed methods study, a communication checklist was developed from the analysis of interviews with patients who were between six weeks and six months post-TKA. Four orthopaedic surgeons then used the checklist to guide discussions with patients about post-operative expectations and outcomes during follow-up visits between six weeks and six months. A visual analogue scale was used to survey two groups of patients on five measures of satisfaction: the standard of care communication group and the intervention group who had received the checklist. The mean scores of the two groups were compared using independent t-tests. The duration of follow-up visits was also tracked to determine if the checklist took significantly more time in practice. Themes from the qualitative analysis of eight patient interviews incorporated into the checklist included pain management, medication, physiotherapy, and general concerns and questions. The quantitative study comprised 127 participants, 67 in the standard of care communication group and 60 in the checklist group. There were no significant group differences in gender, BMI, comorbidities, post-operative complications, marital or occupational status, however the standard of care group was older by six years (p < .001). The checklist group reported significantly greater satisfaction on four of the five measures of satisfaction: TKA satisfaction and expectations met (p = .017), care and concern shown by the surgeons (p = .011), surgeons' communication ability (p = .008), and satisfaction with time surgeons spent with patients during follow-up visits (p < .001). Satisfaction with the TKA for relieving pain and restoring function was not significant (p = .064). Although the checklist increased the average clinic visit time by only 1 minute, 51 seconds, it was significantly greater (p = .001). The impact of age and gender on satisfaction was explored using a two-way analysis of variance. No significant effects or interactions were observed. Checklists have been shown to decrease medical errors and improve overall standards of patient care but no published research to date has used a communication checklist to enhance orthopaedic surgeon-patient communication. The present findings indicate that this simple tool can significantly increase patient satisfaction. This has practical significance because patient satisfaction is a metric that is increasingly used as a key performance indicator for surgeons and health care institutions alike. Increased TKA satisfaction will benefit patients, surgeons, and the health care system overall

Introduction. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used as quality benchmarks in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The objective of this study was to investigate whether PROMs correlate with patient satisfaction, which is arguably the most important and desired outcome. Methods. An institutional joint database was queried for patients who underwent primary, elective, unilateral TJA. Eligible patients were asked to complete a satisfaction survey at final follow-up. Correlation coefficients (R) were calculated to quantify the relationship between patient satisfaction and prospectively collected PROMs. We explored a wide range of PROMs including Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); Short Form-12 (SF-12), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and University of California Los Angeles activity level rating (UCLA). Results. In general, there was only weak to moderate correlation between patient satisfaction and PROMs. Querying the absolute postoperative scores had higher correlation with patient satisfaction compared to either preoperative scores or net changes in scores. The correlation was higher with disease-specific PROMs (WOMAC, OHS, KSCRS) compared to general health (SF-12), activity level (UCLA), or perception of normalcy (SANE). Within disease-specific PROMs, the pain domain consistently carried the highest correlation with patient satisfaction (WOMAC pain subscale, R = 0.45, p <0.001; KSCRS pain subscale, R = 0.49, p <0.001). Conclusion. There is only weak to moderate correlation between PROMs and patient satisfaction. PROMs alone are not the optimal way to evaluate patient satisfaction. We recommend directly querying patients about satisfaction and using shorter PROMs, particularly disease-specific PROMs that assess pain perception to better gauge patient satisfaction. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Overall, hip and knee total joint replacement (TJR) patients experience marked benefit, with reported satisfaction rates of greater than 80% with regard to pain relief and improved function. However, many patients experience ‘nuisance’ symptoms, an annoyance which may cause discomfort, which can negatively impact postoperative satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of nuisance symptoms among TJR patients and impact on overall patient satisfaction. A prospective survey study to assess type and prevalence of primary hip/knee TJR related nuisance symptoms, and impact on patient satisfaction at six-months to one-year post-TJR was conducted. The survey was administered over a one-year period at one academic arthroplasty centre. Survey questions tapped occurrence of commonly reported nuisance symptoms (e.g. localized pain, swelling, stability, incision appearance/numbness, stiffness, clicking/noise, ability to perform activities of daily living), and impact of the symptom on overall hip/knee satisfaction rated on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), (0=no impact, 10=to a great extent). Overall VAS satisfaction with TJR was also assessed (0=not at all satisfied, 10=extremely satisfied). Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. The sample comprised of 974 primary TJR patients, including 590 knees (61%) and 384 hips 39%) who underwent surgery over a one-year period. Among knees, the most commonly reported nuisance symptoms and associated impact to satisfaction per mean VAS scores included: difficulty kneeling (78.2%, mean VAS 4.3, ±3.3), limited ability to run or jump (71.6%, VAS 3.3, ±3.3), numbness around incision (46.3%, VAS 3.8, ±3.3), clicking/noise from the knee (44.2%, VAS 2.7, ±2.7) and stiffness (43.3%, 3.3, ±2.7) following knee arthroplasty. Overall, 88.1% of knee patients surveyed experienced at least one self-reported nuisance symptom at one-year postoperative. Mean overall VAS satisfaction with knee TJR was reported as 9/10 (±1.7). Among hip TJR patients, the most commonly reported nuisance symptoms and associated impact to satisfaction per VAS scores were: limited ability to run or jump (68.6%, VAS 3.4, ±3.4), muscular pain in the thigh (44.8%, VAS 3 ±2.7), limp when walking (37.6%, VAS 4.1, ±3.2), hip stiffness (31%, VAS 3.1, ±2.4), and new or worsening low back pain (24.3%, VAS 2.9, ±2.5). Overall, 93.7% of patients experienced at least one self-reported nuisance symptom at one-year postoperative. Mean overall VAS satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty at one year was reported as 8.9/10 (±1.7). Nuisance symptoms following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty are very common. Despite the high prevalence of such symptoms, impact of individual symptoms to overall TJR satisfaction is minimal and overall TJR patient satisfaction remains high. Careful preoperative counselling regarding the prevalence of such symptoms is prudent and will help establish realistic expectations following primary hip and knee TJR

Introduction. Patient satisfaction is an important outcome measure after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is the ultimate goal of surgery. However, patient satisfaction reflects a complex construct of the patient's personal expectations and preferences in addition to subjective evaluation of outcome after TKA. Multiple studies have found a patient dissatisfaction rate of approximately 20% at 1 year after TKA. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is an association between a single-item validated TKA satisfaction score and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 3 time points (1, 2, and 5 years after TKA) and to determine if dissatisfaction rate after TKA varies over time. Methods. A multi-center, prospective cohort of 12,952 patients (8,078 patients were assessed at 1-year, 702 patients at 2-year, and 4,172 patients at 5-year) undergoing primary TKA were enrolled by 230 surgeons in 28 states between 2012–2015. Surgeons practices varied in size, reimbursement models, and geographic setting ensuring that the cohort included diverse patient populations and delivery models. Surgeons agreed to invite all TKA patients to participate and sporadic audits of surgical logs validated that all patients were invited and > 90% of patients were included. Demographic and clinical data [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and modified Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI)] were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected pre-op and post-op at 1, 2, and 5 years using an internet-based platform including the KOOS (total score, and pain, ADL, QoL sub scores), KOOS Jr, SF-36 (PCS and MCS). We used the single-item satisfaction scale which was tested and validated by the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. The patients' responses were made on 5-point Likert scale (very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, neutral, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied). Patients were classified into 2 categories: satisfied group for patients who answered satisfied or very satisfied and dissatisfied group for patients answered neutral, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. Univariate analysis of the difference between the satisfied and dissatisfied patients' groups was performed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Logistic regression model was performed to study the correlation between the satisfaction and PROMs with 95% confidence interval. Results. Mean age was 66.6 years, 62.7% were female, and mean BMI was 31.6. The CCI was 0 in 55.1%, 1 in 22%, 2–5 in 12.6% and ≥ 6 in 10.3%. Cumulative revision rate was 1.29% at 2 years. The 30-day adverse events incidence was 2.5% while the 90-day adverse events incidence was 4.7%. The dissatisfaction rate was 18.1% at 1-year, 11.5% at 2-year, and 8.5% at 5-year (P<0.001, Chi-square). Dissatisfaction significantly affects younger patients (<55 years) (P=0.04, Chi-square) and patients with high Charlson comorbidity index >1 (P=0.001, Chi-square). Low post-operative KOOS Pain, KOOS ADL, KOOS total score, KOOS JR, SF-36 PCS, and SP-36 MCS scores were significantly associated with dissatisfaction (P<0.001). At 5 years follow-up, in patients with KOOS scores greater than 70, 1.3% of patients were dissatisfied; with KOOS 50–70, 16.3% were dissatisfied and when KOOS < 50, 62.2% are dissatisfied. Logistic regression showed significant correlation of satisfaction with postoperative KOOS pain, KOOS ADL, KOOS QoL, KOOS total score, KOOS JR, and SF-36 PCS (P< 0.001) at 1-year, 2-year, and at 5-year. The MCS was correlated with patient satisfaction only at 1-year (P< 0.001). Conclusion. The patient dissatisfaction rate 5 years after TKA is 8.1% in FORCE-TJR patients which is significantly lower than 18.1% at 1-year. Less improvement of PROM scores after TKA are significantly associated with patient dissatisfaction. Postoperative PROM scores are associated with patient satisfaction at 1-year, 2-years, and 5-years. When the 5-year post- op KOOS total score is >70, 98.7% of patients are satisfied and only 1.3% are dissatisfied. Patient satisfaction is an important outcome measure after TKA that can be determined by asking a single question. However, in order to understand why a patient is dissatisfied, KOOS scores (KOOS pain, KOOS ADL, KOOS QoL) that assess specific postoperative outcomes can assist in determining the reason for patient dissatisfaction after TKA

Background. The posterior slope of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported to vary widely even with computer assisted surgery. In the present study, we analyzed the influence of posterior tibial slope on one-year postoperative clinical outcome after posterior-stabilized (PS) -TKA to find out the optimal posterior slope of tibial component. Materials and Method. Seventy-three patients with varus type osteoarthritic (OA) knees underwent PS-TKA (Persona PS. R. ) were involved in this study. The mean age was 76.6 years old and preoperative HKA angle was 14.3 degrees in varus. Tibial bone cut was performed using standard extra-medullary guide with 7 degrees of posterior slope. The tibial slopes were radiographically measured by post-operative lateral radiograph with posterior inclination in plus value. The angle between the perpendicular line of the proximal fibular shaft axis and the line drawn along the superior margin of the proximal tibia represented the tibial slope angle. We assessed one-year postoperative clinical outcomes including active range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction and symptoms scores using 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS). The influences of posterior tibial slope on one-year postoperative parameters were analyzed using simple linear regression analysis (p<0.05). Results. The average posterior tibial slope was 6.4 ± 2.0 °. The average active ROM were −2.4 ± 6.6 ° in extension and 113.5± 12.6 ° in flexion. The mean one-year postoperative patient satisfaction and symptom scores were 29.3 ± 6.4 and 19.6 ± 3.9 points respectively. The active knee extension, satisfaction and symptom scores were significantly negatively correlated to the posterior tibial slope (r = −0.25, −0.31, −0.23). Discussion. In the present study, we have found significant influence of the posterior tibial slope on the one-year postoperative clinical outcomes in PS-TKA. The higher posterior slope would induce flexion contracture and deteriorate patient satisfaction and symptom. We had reported that the higher tibial posterior slope increased flexion gap and the component gap change during knee flexion in PS-TKA. Furthermore, another study reported that increase of the posterior tibia slope reduced the tension in the collateral ligaments and resulted in the knee laxity at flexion. The excessive posterior slope of tibial component would result in flexion instability, and adversely affected the clinical results including patient satisfaction and symptom. Conclusion. In the PS-TKA for varus type OA knees, excessive tibial posterior slope was found to adversely affect one-year postoperative knee extension and clinical outcome including patient satisfaction and symptom. Surgeons should aware of the importance of tibial slope on one-year postoperative clinical results and pay more attentions to the posterior tibial slope angle not to be excessive

Introduction. Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a proven successful and cost-effective method to relieve pain and improve joint function and quality of life in patients with advanced knee arthritis. However, after a TKA, only 75 to 89% of patients are satisfied. Since patient satisfaction is one of the main objectives of elective orthopaedic surgery, it is important to investigate the reasons for dissatisfaction and develop remedial strategies. Objectives. The aims of the current project are to investigate patient satisfaction after TKA and establish physical, mental and social determinants of patient satisfaction and overall socio-economic costs associated with unsatisfactory outcome. The global objective is to identify patients most likely to benefit from primary TKA, establish optimal evidence-based indications and timing for TKA, and address the necessity to educate patients preoperatively towards realistic expectations or propose alternative therapies. Based on the results, a composite score for patient selection will be developed using objective and subjective parameters. Cut-off values for acceptable indications for TKA will be proposed. Methods. General determinants of patient satisfaction are first investigated in a retrospective and prospective survey of TKA. Expectations regarding the global benefit of TKA, postoperative pain and difficulties are evaluated. Psychological tests assessing the ability of patients to cope with pain are performed. Objective clinical and radiographic parameters, patient reported outcomes and satisfaction are compared between subgroups based on (1) patient intrinsic factors such as gender and age, BMI, co-morbidities, general physical and mental health, activity, level of education and socio-economic situation, (2) implant factors, (3) surgery and surgical experience related factors. Subsequently, a randomized controlled trial of 330 consecutive primary TKAs using 3 contemporary implants of different design concepts will be carried out. Evaluation will be double-blinded (immediately preoperative randomisation, patient blinded, postoperative observer blinded). In addition, a surgeon's assessment of subjective technical difficulty will be performed. A university/teaching hospital setting will be compared with a private hospital and the influence of the surgeon on the level of patient satisfaction will be assessed. Results. Intermediate evaluation of the study revealed extensive logistic difficulties in setting up such a large scale trial and in motivating patients, nursing and medical staff to participate and sustain the necessary commitment and discipline to collect all necessary data at all follow-up intervals. Patients often felt overwhelmed by a multitude of clinical scores and technical assessments leading to a decrease in study compliance and rapid loss to follow-up. Motivation proved easier in a smaller private hospital environment. At the university hospital, patient involvement was enhanced by a personalized approach with information sessions in small groups. The introduction of a new software system with direct patient input via touch screens or remote online completion of scores reduced the data input burden. Scores are examined for simultaneous digital answering of overlapping questions. Conclusions. A large scale trial to investigate longer term patient satisfaction after TKA and establish its determinants involves continuous motivation and sustained discipline of patients and staff. A personalized approach and digital patient reported outcomes prove to maximize data acquisition

Introduction. Circular frames for ankle fusion are usually reserved for complex clinical scenarios. Current literature is heterogenous and difficult to interpret. We aimed to study the indications and outcomes of this procedure in detail. Materials & Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed based on a prospective database of frame surgeries performed in a tertiary institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing complex ankle fusion with circular frames between 2005 and 2020, with a minimum 12-month follow up. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, comorbidities, surgical procedures, external fixator time (EFT), length of stay (LOS), radiological and clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Factors influencing radiological and clinical outcomes were analysed. Results. 47 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of three years. The mean age at time of surgery was 63.6 years. Patients had a median of two previous surgeries. The median LOS was 8.5 days, and median EFT was 237 days. Where simultaneous limb lengthening was performed, the average lengthening was 2.9cm, increasing the EFT by an average of 4 months. Primary and final union rates were 91.5% and 95.7% respectively. At last follow-up, ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good in 87.2%. ASAMI functional scores were good in 79.1%. Patient satisfaction was 83.7%. 97.7% of patients experienced adverse events, most commonly pin-site related, with major complications in 30.2% and re-operations in 60.5%. There were 3 amputations. Adverse events were associated with increased age, poor soft tissue condition, severe deformities, subtalar fusions, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and prolonged EFT. Conclusions. Complex ankle fusion using circular frames can achieve good outcomes in complicated clinical scenarios, however patients can expect a prolonged time in the frame and high rates of adverse events. Multiple risk factors were identified for poorer outcomes, which should be considered in patient counselling and prognostication

Background. In recent literatures, medial instability after TKA was reported to deteriorate early postoperative pain relief and have negative effects on functional outcome. Furthermore, lateral laxity of the knee is physiological, necessary for medial pivot knee kinematics, and important for postoperative knee flexion angle after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA). However, the influences of knee stability and laxity on postoperative patient satisfaction after CR-TKA are not clearly described. We hypothesized that postoperative knee stability and ligament balance affected patient satisfaction after CR-TKA. In this study, we investigated the effect of early postoperative ligament balance at extension on one-year postoperative patient satisfaction and ambulatory function in CR-TKAs. Materials & Methods. Sixty patients with varus osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee underwent CR-TKAs were included in this study. The mean age was 73.6 years old. Preoperative average varus deformity (HKA angle) was 12.5 degrees with long leg standing radiographs. The knee stability and laxity at extension were assessed by stress radiographies; varus-valgus stress X-ray at one-month after operation. We measured joint separation distance (mm) at medial compartment with valgus stress as medial joint opening (MJO), and distance at lateral compartment with varus stress as lateral joint opening (LJO) at knee extension position. To analyze ligament balance; relative lateral laxity comparing to the medial, varus angle was calculated. New Knee Society Score (NKSS) was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction at one-year after TKA. We measured basic ambulatory functions using 3m timed up and go test (TUG) at one-year after surgery. The influences of stability and laxity parameters (MJO, LJO and varus angle at extension) on one-year patient satisfaction and ambulatory function (TUG) was analyzed using single linear regression analysis (p<0.01). Results. MJOs at knee extension one-month after TKA negatively correlated to patient satisfaction (r=−0.37, p<0.01) and positively correlated to TUG time (r=0.38, p<0.01). LJOs at knee extension had no statistically significant correlations to patient satisfaction and TUG. The extension varus angle had significant positive correlation with patient satisfaction (r=0.40, p<0.01). Discussions. In our study, we have found significant correlations of the early postoperative MJOs at extension to postoperative patient satisfaction and TUG one-year after CR-TKA. Our results suggested that early postoperative medial knee stabilities at extension were important for one-year postoperative patient satisfaction and ambulatory function in CR-TKA. Other interest finding was that postoperative patient satisfaction was positively correlated with extension varus angle. This finding suggested that varus ligament balance; relative lateral laxity to medial stability, was beneficial for postoperative patient satisfaction after CR-TKA. Intra-operative soft tissue balance had been reported to significantly affect postoperative knee stabilities. Therefore, with our findings, surgeons might be better to manage intra-operative soft tissue balance to preserve medial stability at extension with permitting lateral laxity, which would enhance patient satisfaction and ambulatory function after CR-TKA for varus type OA knee. Conclusion. Early postoperative medial knee stability and relative lateral laxity would be beneficial for patient satisfaction and function after CR-TKA

Introduction. W. ide . A. wake . L. ocal . A. naesthetic . N. o . T. ourniquet (WALANT) is a well- established day case procedure for carpal tunnel release with several advantages and enhanced post-operative recovery. Use of Local anaesthesia with Adrenaline using a 27G needle allows a bloodless field and distraction techniques achieve patient comfort during the procedure. Objectives. This retrospective, observational cohort study assesses patient satisfaction and undertakes functional evaluation using the validated Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) following WALANT technique for carpal tunnel release (CTR). The BCTQ has a symptom severity scale based on 11 items and a functional status scale of 8 elements. Further we compare surgical outcomes between techniques of WALANT and traditional CTR. Patient and Methods. We included 30 consecutive patients, 15 in each arm who either underwent traditional CTR with the use of Tourniquet or with the WALANTtechnique. Data was collected from Electronic Patient Records and hand therapy assessments. A satisfaction questionnaire and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was utilized to evaluate subjective outcomes. Functional outcomes was assessed by BCTQ scoring system and clinical review. Microsoft Excel was used for analysis. Results. 100% of patients in the WALANT group stated they were satisfied with the operation. Relief from night pain and sleep disturbance were the most improved symptoms. BCTQ and clinical assessment evaluation between both groups revealed comparable results with no significant difference. Conclusion. With advantages of no tourniquet related pain, increased patient satisfaction and functional outcomes on the BCTQ scores, WALANT technique has the potential to be the standard technique for CTR

Patient satisfaction is not uniform or consistent following revision total knee arthroplasty. This study evaluates ninety-nine patients with a self-administered patient satisfaction questionnaire at a minimum of two years following the revision procedure (1997–99) to determine differences between satisfied (sixty-six patients) and dissatisfied patients (thirty-three patients). Univariate analysis revealed that patients satisfied with their results were significantly different (p< .05) than dissatisfied patients with regards to post op scores including those of the WOMAC pain and function, oxford, and SF-12. Patients were not different with regards to (p> .05) age, comorbidity score, surgical approach, or sepsis as a reason for the revision procedure. Regression analysis demonstrated that gender, post-op WOMAC score, and pre-op arc of motion were significant determinants of satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate determinants of patient satisfaction following revision total knee arthroplasty. Patient satisfaction with revision knee surgery is most strongly associated with both pre and post-operative descriptors of knee function as well as gender. Understanding the variables associated with satisfaction/dissatisfaction following revision knee arthroplasty may further assist ongoing research efforts to improve the outcomes of this procedure. Univariate analysis revealed that patients satisfied with their results were significantly different (p< .05) than dissatisfied patients with regards to WOMAC pain and function score, oxford knee score, and SF-12. Patients were not different with regards to (p> .05) age, comorbidity score, surgical approach, or presence of sepsis as a reason for the revision procedure. Regression analysis demonstrated that gender, post-op WOMAC score, and pre-op arc of motion were significant determinants of satisfaction (p< .05). A self-administered patient satisfaction survey was completed by ninety-nine patients at a minimum of two years following revision total knee arthroplasty. Fifty-nine patients were females and forty were males. Sixty-six patients were satisfied and thirty-three patients were dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery at two years post-op. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression suggest that pre and post-operative joint function and gender are the most significant determinants of patient satisfaction

Introduction. Patients-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been reported as the important methods to evaluate clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The patient satisfaction score in Knee Society Score (KSS-2011) has been used in the recent literatures. Patient satisfaction was subjective parameter, and would be affected by multiple factors including psychological factors and physical conditions at not only affected joint but also elsewhere in the body. The question was raised regarding the consistency of patient satisfaction score in KSS-2011 to other PROMs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of patient satisfaction in KSS-2011 to other categories in KSS-2011 and to other PROMs including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and 25-questions in Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). Material & Method. 83 patients over 65 years old with osteoarthritic knees were involved in this study. All patients underwent CR-TKAs (Persona CR. R. ). The means and ranges of demographics were as follows: age; 74.5 years old (65–89), Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle; 12.4 (−6.2–22.5) in varus. We asked patients to fulfill the questionnaire including KSS-2011, FJS-12, EQ-5D and GLFS-25 at 1-year postoperative follow-up visit. KSS-2011 consisted of 4 categories of questions; patient satisfaction (PS), symptoms, patient expectations (PE), functional activities (FA). We evaluated the correlation of PS to other PROMs using simple linear regression analyses (p<0.001). Results. The means and standard deviations of 1-year postoperative scores were as follows: PS; 28.5 ± 7.0, symptoms; 19.1 ± 4.3, PE; 11.2 ± 2.9, FA; 71.5 ± 16.6, FJS-12; 51.5 ± 18.6, EQ5D; 0.69 ± 0.10, GLFS-25; 25.7 ± 16.9. PSs were moderately positively correlated to other categories in KSS-2011(correlation coefficient (r): symptoms; 0.69, PE; 0.73, FA; 0.69). PSs were positively correlated to both FJS-12 and EQ5D (r: FJS-12; 0.72, EQ-5D; 0.67) and negatively correlated to GLFS-25(r; −0.74). Discussions. Patient satisfaction score positively correlated to the symptoms, patient expectation and functional activities in KSS-2011 with moderately high correlation coefficient. This meant the better pain relief and functional outcome improved patient satisfaction. Although there had be reported preoperative higher expectation would lead to poor patient satisfaction postoperatively, we interestingly found positive correlation between patient satisfaction and expectation at 1 year after TKA. Patient with the higher satisfaction tended to expect more in the future, on the other hand, unsatisfied patient with residual pain and/or poor function would resign themselves to the present status and reduced their expectation in our patient population. We have found patient satisfaction score in KSS-2011 significantly correlated to FJS-12 and GLFS-25 with strong correlation coefficient. This meant patient satisfaction could be considered consist to other PROMS in relatively younger patient with better functional status in this study. Conclusion. The patient satisfaction score in KSS-2011 was found to be consistent with moderately high correlations coefficient to other categories in KSS-2011 and other PROMs including FJS-12, EQ-5D, GLFS-25 at 1 year after (CR)-TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction: Patient satisfaction with the outcome of elective surgery is increasingly used as a measure of the patient’s perception of the success of an operation. Satisfaction is an individualistic complex of factors and measuring satisfaction can add another valuable dimension to outcomes assessment after arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to explore patient satisfaction after lower limb arthroplasty. Patients and Methods: All patients who had a primary joint replacement at the Avon Orthopaedic Centre over a 3-year period were invited to participate in the study. Participants completed a questionnaire which consisted of the WOMAC, the Joint-Related Quality of Life Scale from the KOOS/HOOS, SF-12 and a validated satisfaction scale. The satisfaction questionnaire measures patient satisfaction with four domains of outcome: overall outcome, pain relief, ability to perform ADLs and ability to participate in leisure activites. Responses are on a 4-point Likert scale which ranges from very satisfied to very dissatisfied. A global satisfaction score was calculated from these responses and then transformed onto a 0–100 scale (100 being best). Results: Completed questionnaires were received from 2085/3125 patients (67% response rate). 911 respondents had a THR, 866 had a TKR, 157 had a hip resurfacing, 100 had a UKR and 51 had a patellar resurfacing. The mean age of respondents was 70 years and 58% were female. The mean length of follow-up was 28 months. The median satisfaction score was 100 (interquartile range 75–100). However, within the individual outcome domains dissatisfaction rates were: 9% for pain; 12% for overall outcome; 14% for ADLs; and 17% for leisure activities. To explore differences in satisfaction with age, patients were divided into 3 age groups: < 60 years, 60–80 years and > 80 years. The respective rates of dissatisfaction among the age groups were 13%, 11% and 14%, which were not significantly different (p=0.33). In an analysis of gender and satisfaction, significantly more females were dissatisfied than men (14% vs 10%, p=0.01). When pain, function, quality of life, mental health and physical health were compared between patients who were satisfied (n=1834) and dissatisfied (n=251) with their overall outcome, all outcomes were significantly worse in the dis-satisfied patient group (p< 0.001 for all outcomes). Discussion: Although the median satisfaction score in this study was 100, there was a group of patients who were not satisfied with their outcome. As well as having worse joint pain and function, dissatisfied patients also have significantly worse quality of life, physical health and mental health compared to satisfied patients. In conclusion, patient satisfaction is one of the key outcomes that should be strived for after an elective intervention, and these results indicate that joint replacement is failing to fully satisfy a proportion of patients

Background. Kinematic patterns in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can vary considerably from the native knee. No study has shown a relation between a given kinematic pattern and patient satisfaction yet. Questions. The purpose of this study was to test whether the kinematical pattern, and more specifically the anteroposterior translation during (1) open kinetic chain flexion-extension, (2) closed kinetic chain chair rising and (3) squatting, is related to the level of patient satisfaction after TKA. Methods. Thirty TKA patients were tested using single plane fluoroscopy. Tibiofemoral kinematics were analyzed for 3 activities of daily living (open chain flexion-extension (FE) and closed chain chair rising (CH) and squatting(SQ)). A two- step cluster analysis was performed which resulted in two clusters of patients based on the KOOS and KSS questionnaires. Cluster 1 (CL1) contained patients with good PROMs, cluster 2 (CL2) contained patients with poorer PROMs. Tibiofemoral kinematics were compared between and within both clusters. Results. Significant worse PROMs were found in cluster 2 for all KOOS and KSS subscores (P<0.001). Open chain movement: Concerning the open chain flexion extension no significant difference was found between the two clusters. Closed chain movements: On the medial side, an initial anterior translation (femur relative to tibia) was found in cluster 1 during early flexion but in cluster 2 this translation was steeper and ran more anteriorly. In mid-flexion a stable medial compartment was found in cluster 1 where cluster 2 started moving posteriorly already. In deep flexion a posterior translation was evaluated in both clusters. Concerning the lateral side, a small initial anterior translation in early flexion was found followed by a posterior translation in mid flexion which continued in deep flexion Cluster 1 moved significantly more posterior in deep flexion. Conclusion. This is one of the first studies to evaluate the influence of total knee kinematics on patient reported outcomes. We found that patients with poorer PROMs experience (1) a more pronounced paradoxical anterior motion on the medial side followed by (2) a less stable medial compartment in mid flexion and (3) less posterior translation in deep flexion on the lateral side

Introduction. There is current debate concerning the most biomechanically advantageous knee implant systems, and there is also currently great interest in improving patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. Additionally, there is no consensus whether a posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee device is superior to a more congruent, cruciate-substituting, medially-stabilized device (MS). This study compared the clinical outcomes of two such devices. The primary hypothesis was that the clinical outcomes, and specifically the patient satisfaction as measured by the Forgotten Joint Score, would be better in the MS group. Methods. This prospective, randomized, blinded Level 1 study compared the outcomes of 100 patients who received a Medacta GMK PS device and 101 patients who received a Medacta GMK medially-stabilized Sphere device (Medacta Intl., Lugano, Switzerland). All patients undergoing elective primary total knee arthroplasty were eligible for participation. Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent from participants were obtained. The devices were implanted using an anatomic alignment/calipered- measured resection surgical approach. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed preoperatively, 6 weeks, 6 months, and annually. Data were compared using T-test with a significance level of 0.05. Results. The minimum follow-up period is 2 years. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics and preoperative scores; tourniquet time was 7.24% longer for the PS group (40.28 min vs 37.56 min, P < .0086). Alignment was not different between the groups (preoperative or postoperative). There were significant differences between groups for the 1 year and 2 years postop Knee Society scores, Forgotten Joint Score, and ROM; in every case where there was a statistically significant difference, the results were better in the MS group. For example, the FJS was 65.72 in the MS group at 2 years, 54.33 in the PS group (p=0.02). The maximum active flexion at 2 years was 129.75º in the MS group, in the PS group it was 122.27º (p=0.03). Conclusion. The clinical outcomes of the MS group at 1 and 2 years, including the Forgotten Joint Score and flexion, were better statistically, and there was a statistically longer tourniquet time for the PS group. At the minimum 2-year follow-up, the results demonstrate superiority of the medially-stabilized device in terms of multiple clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction as measured by the Forgotten Joint Score. These findings support the use of a medially-stabilized knee implant system, and support the conclusion that this design, in conjunction with an anatomic alignment, calipered-measured resection surgical technique, offers improved biomechanics and kinematics

Purpose of the study: Patient satisfaction is an important element for patient claims. What is the correlation between patient satisfaction and clinical scores?. Material and methods: An independent investigator reviewed the files of patients who underwent exclusive Chopart arthodesis from 1990 to 2000 and who had at least one-year follow-up. Nineteen patients were reviewed using the AOFAS scale. Patient satisfaction as assessed with two scales, a numerical scale from 1 to 10 and a verbal scale noted 1 to 4. Correlations were made with the perception of the disability due to the operation. Results: Fourteen patients exhibited good correlation between the clinical outcome and their level of satisfaction. Five displayed clear divergence: three poor clinical scores with a high level of satisfaction and two good clinical scores in unsatisfied patients. Discussion: The mean scores were around 6/10. Clinical assessment and satisfaction noted on a scale of 10 gave good agreement: the way satisfaction is approached and the patient’s expression of satisfaction may have an important impact. A visual scale with no semantic connotation would be les subject to interpretation since the assessment is made on a numerical scale independently of psychological implications. Conversely, the disability/satisfaction relationship was scored on a four-point scale and demonstrated rather good agreement as did the relationship between disability and clinical score. Five patients exhibited significant divergence showing that the cultural element and collateral factors (comorbid conditions) could be involved. Conclusion: Establishing a pertinent satisfaction scale is a difficult task because the correlation with the clinical outcome is imperfect. This analysis demonstrated that less than satisfactory objective results can be associated with an acceptable level of satisfaction (three patients in this series). This situation is observed in patients aged over 60 years who grew up in an environment where the physician was to be respected and where complaining was not acceptable. This is a cultural factor. Poor appreciations which contrast with a rather average clinical result are related to collateral conditions which explain such behavior. Patient satisfaction is a multifactorial phenomenon. Reliable information collection before the operation should be helpful in allowing the patient to fine-tune expectations concerning the surgical outcome and the reservations to be expressed

Introduction. Despite advances in surgical technique and prosthetics there continues to be a number of patients who are dissatisfied with the results of their knee replacement procedure. The outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported frequently with use of condition-specific measures, but patient satisfaction has not been well studied. Material and methods. 160 patients who received primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were evaluated prospectively to evaluate factors that may be associated with patient satisfaction. At minimum one year follow-up all patients were evaluated and completed validated self-report satisfaction questionnaires. Patient, surgeon, implant and process of care variables were assessed along with WOMAC, Oxford Knee and SF-12 scores. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess for independent factors associated with post-operative satisfaction. Results. Significant factors associated with post-operative satisfaction include (p<0.05): pre-operative pain and function, presence of comorbidity, post-op complication or stiffness. Age, gender, pre-operative diagnosis, flexion contracture, pre-op range of motion, implant type (fixed vs rotating platform), and surgeon did not significantly affect patient-reported satisfaction (p>0.05). Post-operative function and pain (WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score), comorbidity, and mental status (SF-12 mental) were also highly associated with post-operative satisfaction (p<0.05) at one year post-op. Discussion and conclusion. The primary drivers of patient satisfaction appear to be related to patient-related factors including magnitude of baseline disability and comorbidity as well as the development of any post-op complication. Surgeon and implant related factors do not appear to have a significant effect on satisfaction. Understanding determinants of satisfaction may assist the surgeon and patient when planning for surgery and setting realistic expectations for post-operative outcome

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether pain in the contralateral knee had a clinically significant influence on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Secondary aims were to: describe the prevalence of contralateral knee pain; identify if it clinically improves after TKA; and assess whether contralateral knee pain independently influences patient satisfaction with their TKA. Methods. A retrospective cohort of 3,178 primary TKA patients were identified from an arthroplasty database. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and WOMAC scores were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively for the index knee. In addition, WOMAC pain scores were also collected for the contralateral knee. Overall patient satisfaction was assessed at one year. Preoperative contralateral knee pain was defined according to the WOMAC score: minimal (> 78 points), mild (59 to 78), moderate (44 to 58), and severe (< 44). Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding. Results. According to severity there were 1,425 patients (44.8%) with minimal, 710 (22.3%) with mild, 518 (16.3%) with moderate, and 525 (16.5%) with severe pain in the contralateral knee. Patients in the severe group had a greater clinically significant improvement in their functional WOMAC score (9.8 points; p < 0.001). Only patients in the moderate (22.9 points) and severe (37.8 points) groups had a clinically significant improvement in their contralateral knee pain (p < 0.001), but they were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their TKA (moderate: odds ratio (OR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 0.92, p = 0.022; severe: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.82, p = 0.002). Conclusion. Contralateral knee pain did not impair improvement in the WOMAC score after TKA, and patients with the most severe contralateral knee pain had a clinically significantly greater improvement in their functional outcome. More than half the patients presenting for TKA had mild-to-severe contralateral knee pain, most of whom had a clinically meaningful improvement but were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):125–131

Background. Patient satisfaction after TKR ranges from 75 to 95 percent with 5 to 20 percent of patients who are dissatisfied with their outcome. Noble has shown pain to be the most important factor in patient satisfaction after TKR with others showing patient expectation and increased age to be important. Stability of the flexion gap has been shown by Dennis to be important in wear in the long term, but to our knowledge no study has been done linking stability of the flexion gap to patient satisfaction. Methods. 65 patients underwent a computer navigated TKR with a posterior stabilized fixed bearing prosthesis by a single surgeon. Intraoperative measurements were captured of the flexion gap laxity on varus and valgus stress to evaluate stability of the flexion gap. Patients were divided into a stable group with lift off of 3 mm or less and a lax group with lift off of more than 3 mm on either side. No patient in either group had symptoms of clinical instability. This was correlated with patient satisfaction at one year postoperatively as assessed by telephonic interview. Results. The overall satisfaction rating was 81 percent with 54 out of 65 patients satisfied with the result of their total knee replacement. Of the remaining patients 6 were not satisfied and 5 were not sure. When assessed individually the satisfaction rating was 78 percent in the lax group and 88 percent in the stable group. Flexion gap stability contributes toward patient satisfaction after a TKR and needs to be evaluated more critically. NO DISCLOSURES

Every surgeon needs to audit the quality of his work to ensure that complication rates are low, good function persists for the intermediate term, and patient satisfaction remains high. The use of the 12-point shortened WOMAC score and Orthowave patient satisfaction survey provides enough information for quantitative assessment of most practices. When applied to my hip arthroplasty practice, analysis of data related to 426 consecutive patients at 1–9 years of follow-up (mean 3.5) revealed pain relief was good to excellent in 96%; rate of recommendation of surgery was 97%. Overall satisfaction was good to excellent in 95%. Mean WOMAC scores improved from a preoperative mean value of 32.5 to mean 6.6 at latest follow-up. When the same scoring system was applied to my knee arthroplasty practice, results were surprisingly inferior. Potential areas for technical improvement were then identified and implemented. This study highlights the simplicity and usefulness of the shortened WOMAC score and Orthowave patient satisfaction survey in assessing and improving an arthroplasty practice

INTRODUCTION. Patient-reported satisfaction is a critical measure in understanding the clinical success of total knee arthroplasty. Yet, satisfaction levels in TKA patients are generally lower than THA patients; and surgeon-patient agreeability regarding clinical success is typically in discordance. Thus, the purpose of this evaluation was to report on the one-year satisfaction data of a group of sensor-assisted TKA patients, and compare that data to the average satisfaction reported in literature, as measured by a meta-analysis. METHODS. One hundred and thirty five patients received TKA utilizing intra-operative sensing technology to evaluate soft-tissue balance as part of a prospective multicenter study. Patients were classified by two groups: “balanced” and “unbalanced”. Quantitative “balance” was defined as a mediolateral intercompartmental loading difference of ≤ 15 pounds; all loading exceeding 15 pounds was classified as “unbalanced”. At the one-year follow-up visit, a 7-question patient satisfaction survey was administered. The answering schema of this survey was modeled using a modified five-point Likert scale, ranging from “True” to “False” (or “Very Satisfied” to “Very Dissatisfied,” where appropriate). A meta-analysis of literature was performed and studies selected for inclusion in this analysis were required to meet the following criteria: all patients were in receipt of a primary TKA; satisfaction data was collected post-operatively; and the proportion of patients who were “satisfied” to “very satisfied” was statistically described. RESULTS. The overall satisfaction of sensor-assisted patients—indicating “satisfied” to “very satisfied”—at one-year, was 94.2%. The satisfaction levels, stratified by “balanced” and “unbalanced” patients, was 96.7% and 82.1%, respectively. The difference between the satisfaction of balanced and unbalanced patients is statistically significant (P=0.043). Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis, which yielded a significant amount of homogeneity (B-F=3.048; homogeneity<0.001; df=11) [Figure 1]. The average satisfaction reported in literature for TKA patients is 81%, which is 16% lower than the balanced patients in the prospective patient group (P<0.001). It was found that, on average, 81% of TKA patients, as reported in the included meta-analysis literature, were “satisfied” to “very satisfied”. This represents a 16% decrease from the balanced cohort evaluated in this study (P=0.001). The average satisfaction reported in literature was more in agreement with the unbalanced cohort (82.1%). DISCUSSION. Quantifiably balanced TKA patients, verified by intraoperative sensors, exhibited significantly higher satisfaction than unbalanced patients at 1- year post-operatively (P<0.001). Specifically, the number of satisfied, balanced patients was 14.6% higher than satisfied unbalanced patients. The meta-analysis provided the opportunity to reasonably compare the average satisfaction across all included literature. The highest reported satisfaction among the evaluated literature was 90.3%, which is still 6.4% lower than the balanced patient group (P=0.045). The results of this study suggest that there may be a way to improve patient satisfaction in TKA. By verifiably balancing soft-tissues of the sensor-assisted TKA group, marked improvement in satisfaction scores was seen at one year. These trends toward better function and higher satisfaction are promising for the future of clinical success in TKA. Longer follow-up is ongoing and will be used to determine the longevity of this encouraging trend

Purpose. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful surgeries with respect to relieving pain and restoring function of the knee. However, some studies have reported that patients are not always satisfied with their results after TKA. The aim of this study was to determine which factors contribute to patient's satisfaction after TKA. Methods. We evaluated 69 patients who had undergone 76 primary TKAs between March 2012 and June 2013, and assessed patient- and physician- reported scores using the 2011 Knee Society Scoring System and clinical variables before and after TKAs. We determined the correlation between patient satisfaction and clinical variables. Results. The mean (SD) pre-operative score was 8.2 (4.9) for symptoms, 11.5 (4.5) for patient's satisfaction, 13.1 (2.2) for patient's expectations, and 35.4 (18.2) for functional activities. The mean (SD) post-operative score was 16.3 (5.0) for symptoms, 20.7 (6.4) for patient's satisfaction, 9.1 (2.3) for patient's expectations, and 47.4 (19.6) for functional activities. We found that physician- reported scores were higher than patient- reported scores, and improvement in patient- reported scores was lower than that of physician- reported scores following TKA. We did not found a correlation between any pre-operative variables including expectation and post-operative satisfaction. Post-operative symptoms (r=0.51, p<0.01) and functions (r=0.39, p<0.01) correlated with post-operative satisfaction. The predictors of patient dissatisfaction after TKA were remaining symptoms and low postoperative activities. Conclusions. Our study demonstrates that to relieve pain and to restore activities is important for increasing patient satisfaction after TKA. The 2011 Knee Society Scoring System allows surgeons to appreciate differences in the priorities of patients with TKA

Aims. While patients with psychological distress have poorer short-term outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), their longer-term function is unknown. We aimed to 1) assess the influence of preoperative mental health status on long-term functional outcomes, quality of life, and patient satisfaction; and 2) analyze the change in mental health after TKA, in a cohort of patients with no history of mental health disorder, with a minimum of ten years’ follow-up. Methods. Prospectively collected data of 122 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA in 2006 were reviewed. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively at two and ten years using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Function Score (KSFS); Oxford Knee Score (OKS); and the Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) which were derived from the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Patients were stratified into those with psychological distress (MCS < 50, n = 51) and those without (MCS ≥ 50, n = 71). Multiple regression was used to control for age, sex, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and baseline scores. The rate of expectation fulfilment and satisfaction was compared between patients with low and high MCS. Results. There was no difference in the mean KSKS, KSFS, OKS, and SF-36 PCS at two years or ten years after TKA. Equal proportions of patients in each group attained the minimal clinically important difference for each score. Psychologically distressed patients had a comparable rate of satisfaction (91.8% (47/51) vs 97.1% (69/71); p = 0.193) and fulfilment of expectations (89.8% vs 97.1%; p = 0.094). The proportion of distressed patients declined from 41.8% preoperatively to 29.8% at final follow-up (p = 0.021), and their mean SF-36 MCS improved by 10.4 points (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Patients with poor mental health undergoing TKA may experience long-term improvements in function and quality of life that are comparable to those experienced by their non-distressed counterparts. These patients also achieved a similar rate of satisfaction and expectation fulfilment. Undergoing TKA was associated with improvements in mental health in distressed patients, although this effect may be due to residual confounding. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):845–851

Abstract

Background. In this study, we assessed implant survivorship, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes at two years for patients implanted with a customized, posterior stabilized knee replacement system. Methods. Ninety-three patients (100 knees) with the customized PS TKR were enrolled at two centers. Patients’ length of hospitalization and preoperative pain intensity were assessed. At a single time point follow-up, we assessed patient reported outcomes utilizing the KOOS Jr., satisfaction rates, implant survivorship, patients’ perception of their knee and their overall preference between the two knees, if they had their contralateral knee replaced with an off-the-shelf (OTS) implant. Results. At an average of 1.9-years implant survivorship was found to be 100%. From pre-op until time of follow-up, we observed an average decrease of 5.4 on the numeric pain rating scale. Satisfaction rate was found to be high with 90% of patients being satisfied or very satisfied and 88% of patients reporting a “natural” perception of their knee some or all the time. Patients with bilateral implants mostly (12/15) stated that they preferred their customized implant over the standard TKR. The evaluation of KOOS Jr. showed an average score of 90 at the time of the follow up. Conclusion. Based on our results, we believe that the customized PS implant provides patients with excellent outcomes post-surgery. Moreover, a subset of patients with an OTS implant in one knee and a customized PS implant in the other, we observed a trend in patients preferring the customized PS device over their OTS counterparts

In this study we evaluated whether pre-operative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis scores can predict satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prospective data for a cohort of patients undergoing THA from two large academic centres were collected, and pre-operative and one-year post-operative WOMAC scores and a 25-point satisfaction questionnaire were obtained for 446 patients. Satisfaction scores were dichotomised into either improvement or deterioration. Scatter plots and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient were used to describe the association between pre-operative WOMAC and one-year post-operative WOMAC scores and patient satisfaction. Satisfaction was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis against pre-operative, post-operative and δ WOMAC scores. . We found no relationship between pre-operative WOMAC scores and one-year post-operative WOMAC or satisfaction scores, with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients of 0.16 and –0.05, respectively. The ROC analysis showed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.54 (pre-operative WOMAC), 0.67 (post-operative WOMAC) and 0.43 (δ WOMAC), respectively, for an improvement in satisfaction. . We conclude that the pre-operative WOMAC score does not predict the post-operative WOMAC score or patient satisfaction after THA, and that WOMAC scores can therefore not be used to prioritise patient care. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:150–3

Patient satisfaction is becoming increasingly important as a crucial outcome measure for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine how well commonly-used clinical outcome scales correlate with patient satisfaction after TKA. In particular, we sought to determine whether patient satisfactions correlate better with absolute postoperative scores or preoperative to 12-month postoperative changes. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using four grades (enthusiastic, satisfied, noncommittal, and disappointed) for 438 replaced knees that were followed for longer than one year. Outcomes scales used AKS, WOMAC and SF-36 scores. Correlation analyses were performed to investigate the relation between patient satisfaction and the 2 different aspects of the outcome scales: postoperative scores evaluated at latest follow-ups and pre- to postoperative changes. The WOMAC function score was most strongly correlated with satisfaction (correlation Coefficient = 0.45). Absolute postoperative scores were better correlated with satisfaction than the pre- to postoperative changes for all scales. This study demonstrates that patient satisfaction correlates better with patient-derived and disease specific scales (WOMAC) than physician-driven (AKS) or generic (SF-36) measures. The present study also shows that absolute postoperative status is more important pre- to postoperative change when determining patient satisfaction

Introduction:. Patient Satisfaction after Arthroplasty is being considered as a priority outcome and an important addition to traditional outcome measures. The reported satisfaction rate in the literature is disappointing (75%–89%). Traditional techniques for TKA have made neutral (0° ±3°) coronal alignment a primary technical goal. We present the results of “Ideal Arthroplasty Kinematics” ie a perfectly balanced knee irrespective of mechanical alignment. Materials and Methods:. The primary technical goal was to achieved tensiometer controlled balance, within 2 degrees, of medial and lateral soft tissues throughout range of motion, and equal gap sizes within 2 mm. 864 (92.9%) of 914 patients, operated by one surgeon, between January 2007 and December 2012 were prospectively followed for an average of 40.4 months. They were asked if they were satisfied, unsatisfied or unsure by an independent research-nursing sister. Unsure patients were categorized as unsatisfied. 817 (94.5%) of this group had satisfactory postoperative long leg x-rays as per Paley's technique. The patient satisfaction was correlated to post-operative mechanical axis (M.A.). Results:. 803 (92.9%) of the patients were satisfied with their knees. 719 (88%) had a M.A. within ±3° of neutral; so called “Aligned” knees. 98 (12%) had a M.A. >3°; so called “Outliers”. Patients with aligned knees had a 92.4% satisfaction rate and those that were outliers were satisfied 92.9% of the time. Conclusion:. By attempting to achieve “Ideal Arthroplasty Kinematics” – ensuring the medial and lateral soft tissues are balanced within a couple of degrees using a tensiometer better patient satisfaction has been achieved than previously reported. Knee alignment did not affect satisfaction rate. It seems it is better to leave constitutionally varus patients in varus and similarly valgus patients in valgus

Background. Under- or oversizing of either component of a total knee implant can lead to early component loosening, instability, soft tissue irritation or overstuffing of joint gaps. All of these complications may cause postoperative persistent pain or stiffness. While survival of primary TKA's is excellent, recent studies show that patient satisfaction is worse. Up to 20% of the patients are not satisfied with the outcome as and residual pain is still a frequent occurrence. The goal of this study was therefore to evaluate if the sizing of the femoral component, as measured on a 3D-reconstructed projection, is related to patient reported outcome measures. From our prospectively collected TKA outcome database, all patients with a preoperative CT and a postoperative X-ray of their operated knee were included in this study. Of these 43 patients, 26 (60,5%) were women and 17 (39,5%) were men. The mean age (+/−SD) was 74,6 +/− 9 years. Methods. CT scans were acquired. All patients underwent TKA surgery in a single institution by one surgical team using the same bi- cruciate substituting total knee (Journey II BCS, Smith&Nephew, Memphis, USA). Using a recently released X-ray module in Mimics (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium), this module allows to align the post-operative bi-planar x-rays with the 3D- reconstructed pre-operative distal femur and to determine the 3D position of the bone and implant models using the CAD- file of the implant. This new technique was validated at our department and was found to have a sub-degree, sub-millimeter accuracy. Eleven zones of interest were defined. On the medial and the lateral condyle, the extension, mid-flexion and deep flexion facet were determined. Corresponding trochlear zones were defined and two zones were defined to evaluate the mediolateral width. In order to compare different sizes, elastic deforming mesh matching algorithms were implemented to transfer the selected surfaces from one implant to another. The orthogonal distances from the implant to the nearest bone were calculated. Positive values represent a protruding (oversized) femoral component, negative values an undersized femoral component. The figure shows the marked zones on the femoral implant. The KOOS subscores and KSS Satisfaction subscore were evaluated. Results. Two-step cluster analysis based on the clinically relevant zones on both medial (zone 12, 14 and 17) and lateral (zone 2, 5 and 9) femoral condyle of the implant, led to the formation of two clusters. Cluster 1 contained 23 patients with, in general, an undersized femoral component (negative values) whilst cluster 2 contained 20 patients with in general an oversized femoral component (positive values). (see graph) No significant differences were found between both clusters regarding demographics. Regarding PROM data, a significant difference was found for KOOS Symptoms (p=0.037) and a KOOS Pain (p=0.05). Other PROMs are not significantly different between both clusters. Conclusion. Our data shows that undersizing the femoral component results in less postoperative pain and symptoms. The clinical consequence of this study is that in case of in between femoral component sizes, the smallest size should be chosen to diminish the occurrence of postoperative pain and symptoms

Introduction: Women have gender specific shape of the distal femur. To fit these gender characteristics, gender specific femoral implants were developed for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to compare. objective and subjective functional improvement;. patient satisfaction and preference and. cost-utility ratio after gender specific TKA or standard component implanted on the same women. Materials and Methods: 30 women (60 knees) operated on successively (6 months in between) for a bilateral TKA between March 2006 and March 2008 by the same surgeon were included in this prospective study. The same surgical protocol and the same post-operative management protocol were applied for both sides. Mean age was 67±3 and mean BMI 26±4 Kg/m. 2. At a minimum follow-up of one year, evaluation objective and subjective functional improvement, patient satisfaction and preference and cost-utility analysis were performed double blind. Results: Knee Society knee score and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) improvements were comparable in both groups. However, 75% of the women preferred their gender TKA (p< 0.001). 68% of the women described less crepitus or anterior knee bothering after gender TKA (p=0.003) and 64% had faster recovery with the gender implant (p< 0.001). The cost-utility analysis was favorable for the gender knee. Discussion: No objective or subjective superiority in terms of functional improvement was shown with gender specific implants at this short-term follow-up. However significant differences in terms of patient satisfaction and preference and a favorable cost-utility analysis were observed. These results should now be confirmed at longer-follow-up. Despite comparative functional improvement, patient satisfaction and preference were higher for the side implanted with a gender specific TKA in this prospective comparative study

Introduction. Patients who undergo total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are at a high risk for the development of thromboembolic complications. The rate at which venous thromboembolism occurs following TJA has been reported to be between 1.3–9.4%. As a result, the utilization of prophylactic therapies is considered standard of care in this patient population. The primary purpose of the current study was to 1) evaluate patient satisfaction with the use of intermittent compression devices 2) evaluate the risk of self-reported falls secondary to the use of these devices following TJA. Methods. This is a single institution, prospective study on patients who underwent TJA at an urban, academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Patients were surveyed using an electronic patient rehabilitation application regarding their use and satisfaction with their home intermittent compression devices with a battery and power cord attachment that the patient must wear while using the devices. They were also asked if any falls or near-falls they may have experienced. Surveys were administered on postoperative Day 14, and patients were given 10 days to submit their responses. Using our institutions data warehouse, patient demographics were also collected (Table 1). Results. Survey responses were collected from 479 patients who underwent TJA between August 2018 and October 2018. Of the respondents, 278 were female and 201 were male. Approximately 79% of patients in the cohort were satisfied with their use of their compression devices compared to 21% of patients who were unsatisfied. During this time, 16% of patients (75 pts) also reported at least one tripping episode at home and 11 patients (2.3%) had at least one fall at home. Conclusion. These results suggest that patients are generally satisfied with their home intermittent compression devices. There are a significant number of trips or falls after surgery and further study examining the potential role of these devices and their cords in these falls is needed. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Introduction. With the increasing burden of geriatric population in India, TKR is a very common procedure done these days. But as compared to western population the expectations of the people are different in our country. Indian patients want to sit cross legged and squat but can tolerate pain and limp better. So our population has different satisfaction levels after surgery. Keeping this in mind, post op evaluation should also include the performance as well as satisfaction levels. The factors affecting these parameters need to be studied. The current trend is to operate on younger people with more life expectancy and lesser co-morbidities but they have higher demands. Thus it is important to follow TKR patients for an extended time and to study their performance and satisfaction levels and the effect of pre op factors on these parameters. Objectives. To evaluate the patient's satisfaction in terms of postoperative pain and functional outcome. To identify preoperative characteristics predicting the postoperative outcome. MATERIAL AND METHOD. A study was done to analyse the satisfaction level, physical activity and quality of life after one year of TKR surgery using KOOS scoring system and DMC&H General Patient Questionnaire. Clinical data was recorded and a Performa was filled of 104 patients with 152 cemented total knee arthroplasty operated from June 2010 till December 2012 of who consented and underwent surgery at Dayanand Medical College & Hospital Ludhiana (India). Out of these, 56 were unilateral and 48 were bilateral cases. Results. There was a significant improvement in means of all the five KOOS subscale scores but mean difference of the pre op and post op KOOS sports/recreational scores was low as compared to other four subscales. There was no significant effect of sex, duration of symptoms, number of co-morbidities and BMI on post op KOOS outcome scores and patient's satisfaction. Younger age group patients had higher post op KOOS scores but older age group patients had higher post op satisfaction levels. Patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKR had higher post op KOOS scores and higher satisfaction levels as compared to patients undergoing unilateral TKR. Patients with higher preop functional and KOOS scores also had better postop satisfaction levels. Mean postoperative KOOS Scores had trend of higher scores in OA patients as compared to RA patients. Post op KOOS pain and ADL scores were comparable to patient's satisfaction level83.7% patients had excellent satisfaction level, 12.5% good, 1.9% fair and 1.9% poor satisfaction one year after surgery. CONCLUSION. Total knee replacement significantly improves patient's pain, symptoms, function and activities of daily living and knee related quality of life. Characters like sex, duration of symptoms, number of co-morbidities and BMI do not significantly affect the outcome. However, preop diagnosis, higher preoperative KOOS score, simultaneous bilateral replacements had possitive effect on postoperative KOOS score and satisfaction levels after 1 year follow up. In younger patients KOOS score improvement was better but satisfaction levels were lower

Introduction: Increasing numbers of patients are being treated outside traditional NHS hospitals as part of GSup (General supplemental funding) projects and other initiatives to reduce waiting lists. Concerns regarding these arrangements include case mix at NHS hospitals, quality of clinical care and patient satisfaction. Null Hypothesis: There is no difference between overall patient satisfaction following treatment within the NHS, as part of GSup or as an independent private patient. Methods: Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty by a single consultant were contacted 6 to 18 months postop. 3 groups were formed; those treated in the local NHS hospital, patients treated as part of GSup and private patients independently financed. A previously validated patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed by each patient. This investigates satisfaction with admission, environment, healthcare professionals, treatment, leaving hospital and overall care. Fisher exact test used to compare groups for significant differences in responses, significance was assumed at p< 0.05 level. Results: 144 of 202 patients responded. Though generally high overall levels of satisfaction were reported, areas of concern were identified, particularly regarding cleanliness of hospital, the availability of nursing staff, maintenance of patient confidentiality and communication with patients. In all cases the GSup patients reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction compared with the NHS patients. 12% of NHS patients felt their overall care fell below “very good” compared with 0% of the GSup patients (p< 0.05). Discussion: Significant differences are identified between NHS and GSup patient satisfaction regarding hospital environment, healthcare professionals and overall standards of care. There were few differences between GSup and private patients treated in the same environment but where they did occur they were universally more positive for the GSup patients. Conclusions: Concerns that GSup patients may be less satisfied with their care appear unfounded; in general they were better satisfied than NHS patients

Introduction: In comparison to anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty has the potential of maintaining normal segmental lordosis, anatomical disc space height, and physiological motion patterns that may reduce or delay the onset of degenerative disc disease at adjacent cervical spinal motion segments. Aim: The objective of this study was to determine patient satisfaction post cervical disc arthroplasty. by evaluating each patient both clinically and radiologically. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed on all patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy who had undergone cervical disc arthroplasty by a single surgeon after a standard anterior cervical discectomy. Outcome measures included the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaires, neurological status, and radiographic status. Results: Over a 32 month period, 15 patients underwent cervical disc arthroplasty, with 12 patients undergoing single level arthroplasty. 2 patients undergoing 2 level arthroplasty and one patient undergoing a 3 level arthroplasty. The C5/C6 level was involved in 9 cases (60%). The male female ratio was 7:8. The mean age at presentation was 45 years (range, 28–59). The mean follow up was 24 months (range, 5–31). The mean improvement in NDI scores was 34.8. The mean PCS and MCS scores of the SF-36 test improved by 12.8 and 7.7 respectively. There was no neurological deficit. There were no cases of implant failures, migrations or subsidence. Conclusion: High patient satisfaction levels highlight the efficacy and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty, but longer term follow up is required to assess the long term functionality of the prosthesis and its protective influence on adjacent levels

Introduction. The relationship between sagittal component alignment on clinical outcomes has not fully evaluated after TKA. This study evaluated the effect of sagittal alignment of the components on patient function and satisfaction as well as kinematics and kinetics. Methods. This study included 148 primary TKAs with cruciate-substituting prosthesis for primary OA. With post-operative lateral radiograph, femoral component flexion angle (γ) and tibial component posterior slope angle (90-σ) was measured. The patients was classified into multiple groups by every three degrees. Patient satisfaction in 2011KSS among groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. By representing the component position which showed poor clinical outcomes, computer simulation analysis was performed, in which kinematics and kinetics in squatting activity were investigated. Results. The femoral component flexion angle was 4.3 ± 3.3°, and tibial component posterior slope angle was 4.5 ± 3.4°, in average. Patients whose femoral component was implanted more than 9 degrees flexion showed lower satisfaction (Figure). There was no difference in satisfaction according to tibial component angle. Computer simulation analysis showed that excessive flexed position caused no remarkable abnormal kinematics, but increased maximum contact force in medial compartment (1097 N to 1711 N), and femoral component down-size did not fully decrease the contact force (1330 N). Similarly, increase of the maximum ligament force in medial collateral ligament (MCL) (188 N to 671 N) was observed in excessive flexed position, and femoral component downsize (343 N) did not fully recovered the ligament force. Conclusion. Excessive flexion of the femoral component showed poor satisfaction. In computer simulation, increase of the contact force of the medial compartment and MCL was observed in computer simulation. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Introduction. There is increasing pressure on healthcare providers to demonstrate competitiveness in quality, patient outcomes and cost. Robotic and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been shown to be more accurate than conventional TKA, thereby potentially improving quality and outcomes, however these technologies are usually associated with longer procedural times and higher costs for hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine the surgical efficiency, learning curve and early patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted TKA with a contemporary imageless system. Methods. The first 29 robotic-assisted TKA cases performed by a single surgeon having no prior experience with computer or robotic-assisted TKA were reviewed. System time stamps were extracted from computer surgical reports to determine the time taken from the first step in the anatomical registration process, the hip center acquisition, to the end of the last bone resection, the validation of the proximal tibial resection. Additional time metrics included: a) array attachment, b) anatomical registration, c) robotic-assisted femoral resection, d) tibial resection, e) trailing, f) implant insertion, and skin-to-skin time. The Residual Time was also calculated as the skin-to-skin time minus the time taken for steps a) to f), representing the time spent on all other steps of the procedure. Patients completed surveys at 3 months to determine their overall satisfaction with their surgical joint. Results. All time metrics decreased significantly after the first 7 cases, except the residual time (table 1 and figure 1). Mean skin-to-skin time significantly decreased from 83.7min to 57.1min (p=0.0008) beyond 7 cases, and hip center to final cut validation time decreased from 30.2min to 20.3min (p=0.0002). 85.7% (24/29) of patients were “Fully satisfied” and 14.3% (5/29) were “Partly satisfied”. Cost analysis showed there were no capital costs associated with acquisition of the robotic system and per case cost was equal to conventional TKA. Conclusion. Improvements in surgical efficiency and quality are becoming increasing important in today's healthcare environment. The results of this study indicated equal cost, a short learning curve and comparable procedure times to conventional TKA. The Patient Reported Outcomes with this group of patients was very high compared to rates reported in the literature

Previous studies have demonstrated the benefits of arthroscopic arthrolysis in relieving pain and improving motion in arthritic elbows, but none have reported the specific functional recovery. This study aims to review the functional outcome and patient satisfaction in a series of patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis for intrinsic stiffness, pain and arthritis not suitable for arthroplasty. Twenty six patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis over a three year period were included. All patients were manual workers or strength athletes. All had pain and stiffness secondary to primary or secondary arthritis, with or without loose bodies. Pre- and post-operative evaluation included the Elbow Functional Assessment score, patient satisfaction and return to work and sports. The mean follow up period was 22 months. Function improved significantly in 87% with overall improvement in the Elbow Functional Assessment score from a preoperative score of 48 to a postoperative score of 84 (p< 0.05). All except three patients returned to their desired level of activity by 3 months postoperatively. Pain improved in 91%, mechanical symptoms in 80%, stiffness in all except one. The arc of elbow movement improved from 106° to 124° with a mean gain in elbow extension of 13°. Mayo elbow performance index also significantly improved postoperatively. Overall, 87% patients were very satisfied with the outcome. We conclude that the arthroscopic arthrolysis improves elbow function and returns patients to their desired level of activity, as well as improving range of motion and pain in patients with intrinsic elbow stiffness and pain

To audit patient satisfaction throughout the perioperative period amongst emergency and elective admissions in the spinal team. 92 patients were identified whom underwent operations within a 3 month period using the operating database. A self administered postal questionnaire was sent to assess preoperative waiting time, quality of preoperative assessment and information given, assessment of their admission, their experience throughout hospital stay and the quality of their post operative assessment and discharge. Patient reported outcomes (PROMS). Response rate 35% (32/92) of which 24 (14F 10M) were elective admissions and 8 emergency admissions (2F 6M). Average wait for elective procedure was 5.7 weeks (median 2). 63% of elective patients were seen in prescreening clinic and 79% of these received an information booklet prior to operation. 22% of patients had delayed discharge due to non clinical causes including awaiting transport, awaiting medications and physiotherapy clearance. 88% of patients reported they were given adequate information regarding post-operative daily activities. 79% of elective patients reported seeing a doctor on the day of their discharge however only 38% reported seeing a physiotherapist postoperatively. This fell to 0% for patients operated on a Friday. Although 94% of patients reported that they were satisfied with the overall care they were given, they reported certain aspects of their clinical care being less than optimal. Trust wide assessment of patient reported outcomes to assess and improve the quality of care against national guidelines. Ethics Approval: Self questionnaire approved by ethics committee

Purpose: To identify the determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Method: 206 patients underwent arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Included patients had minimum 1 year follow-up (mean = 16 months; range: 12 to 27 months) with complete demographic, surgical, subjective, and objective data. Average age at time of surgery was 39 years(range:16–77). Outcomes data were collected from modified Harris Hip score(MHHS), Hip outcome score ADL(HOS ADL), Hip outcome score Sports scale(HOS Sport), non-arthritic hip score(NAHS) and patient satisfaction (1=unsatisfied, 10=very satisfied). Dependent variables were patient satisfaction and modified Harris hip score. Independent variables included demographic, surgical, objective and subjective follow-up parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify determinants of satisfaction and outcome. Results: Average patient satisfaction was 8(range:1–10) and was not normally distributed so nonparametric univariate analysis was used. Average MHHS improved 18 points to 81(range:18–100, p=0.001). Average HOS ADL improved 14 points to 85(range: 28–100, p=0.001). Average HOS Sport improved 22 points to 63(range: 0–100, p=0.001). Average NAHS improved 16 points to 81(range: 0–100, p=0.001. Variables not associated with satisfaction were BMI (p=0.110)(average 24.5 . kg. /. m. 2. ) and preoperative MHHS (p=0.318). Factors associated with patient satisfaction were age(p=0.001), gender(p=0.006), time from onset of symptoms to surgery (p=0.021), joint space (p=0.001), femoral head microfracture (p=0.006), and acetabular microfracture (p=0.001). Satisfaction was related to improvement in MHHS (p=0.001), NAHS (p=0.001), HOS ADL (p=0.001), and HOS Sport (p=0.001). Fifteen(5%) patients underwent total hip arthroplasty at an average of 12.4 months(range: 3.2–24.3 months) post-arthroscopy. Patients who had a joint space less than 2.0mm, were 6.8 times more likely to undergo THA following hip arthroscopy(CI: 2.3–20). Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased satisfaction with increased post-op modified Harris hip score and decreased age(r. 2. =0.57, p=0.0001). Independent predictors of improvement in MHH were age, preoperative MHH and microfracture(r. 2. =0.36, p=0.001). Conclusion: Predictors of increased patient satisfaction include high MHH and absence of microfracture treatment. Patients experienced significant improvement in function at least 1-year postoperatively. This study illustrates the potential of functional improvement and offers patients with FAI a less invasive procedure through arthroscopic methods

Aims: To determine pre and post-op patient satisfaction and to document complications. Methods: A questionnaire based study of a consecutive series of 71 Birmingham Hip Resurfacings performed by a single surgeon over a two year period. Mean age 54 (range 29 to 70 years). Outcome measures used were the Oxford Hip Score and Short Form 36 Results: There was a signiþcant improvement in outcome scores following surgery. Oxford hip score improved from 41.1 to 16.6 (signiþcant p< 0.05) SF36 score improved from 24.8 to 48.2 (signiþcant p< 0.05) Complications were 2 femoral nerve palsies, 1 lateral popliteal nerve palsy, 1 re-operation for a retained guide pin, 1 post operative fracture, 1 DVT, 1 PE and 8 patients received oral antibiotics for wound erythema or discharge but there were no deep infections. 89% would recommend the operation to a friend, with males rating the operation more highly. Mean visual analogue score of 91% for overall satisfaction, again males rating higher. Conclusions: Birmingham Hip Resurfacing gave signiþcant improvements in patient function, comparable or better than other similar results looking at conventional hip replacement. Patient satisfaction is high despite the younger patient group with active life styles. The group includes one Jiu Jitsu instructor and a triple marathon runner. One patient had previously had a contralateral conventional uncemented total hip replacement which he was pleased with... until he had experienced Òthe ÒfeelÒ of my Birmingham HipÒ

To audit and assess the cost effectiveness and patient satisfaction of an orthopaedic pre-admission clinic. A pre-admission clinic for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery has been in use in our hospital for the past 3 years. We audited the activities of this clinic over a period of 1 year and also assessed the cost effectiveness and patient satisfaction over the study period. Over 1 year, 2391 patients were invited and 2167 (90. 63 %) attended the clinic. Patients’ satisfaction was assessed using a multidimensional questionnaire which included information on time spent with patients by doctors and nurses and communication, facilities, patient involvement and overall quality of the clinic. Patient cancellation and deferring of surgery was also calculated. Cost of bed blocking due to cancellation following admission and cost of theatre time was also calculated. During the 1 year period, the non-attendance rate was 9. 37 % (224 patients). The cancellation rate following admission was 3. 4% (75 patients). 270 patients (11. 3%) had their surgery postponed due to medical and social reasons. Of the 2167 patients, 1822 (84%) had their surgery performed as scheduled. Thirty percent of the patients were unaware that they would be seen by both doctors and nurses. All the patients were satisfied with time spent with them and the information given regarding the surgery. 90% of the attending patients rated the service as excellent to good. Based on average cost of one night stay and overnight bed blocking and theatre time, this clinic has saved over £200, 000 for the Trust. The pre-admission clinic for elective orthopaedic surgery is not only cost effective but also reduces the ward-based workload for the junior doctors

During the COVID-19 pandemic, video/phone consultations (VPC) were increasingly utilised as an alternative to face-to-face (F2F) consultations, to minimise nosocomial viral exposure. We previously demonstrated that VPCs were highly rated by both patients and clinicians. This study compared satisfaction between both clinic modalities in contemporaneously delivered outpatient surveys. We also assessed the feasibility and effects of converting F2F orthopaedic consultations to VPC.

Surveys were posted to patients who attended VPCs and F2F consultations at a large tertiary centre from August to October 2020 inclusive, across 51 specialties. F2F and VPC patients ranked their overall satisfaction with their consultation on a 10-point numerical scale (10=highest satisfaction). Simultaneously, a pilot study was undertaken of outpatient fracture clinics to identify patients suitable for VPCs, with X-rays (if needed) taken and transferred from satellite sites to reduce tertiary centre footfall.

For F2F consultations, 1419 of 4465 surveys (31.8%) were returned with similar rates for VPCs (1332 of 4572, 29.1%). While mean satisfaction ratings were high for both clinic modalities, they were significantly higher for F2F: 9.13 (95% CI 9.05-9.22) for F2F clinics, compared to 8.23 (95% CI 8.11-8.35) for VPCs (p<0.001, t-test). F2F patients were almost four times more likely to state a preference for future F2F appointments compared to VPCs, whereas patients who attended VPCs showed an equal preference for either option (p< 0.001, chi2 test). 53% of 111 fracture clinic patients sampled were identified as suitable for VPCs. 1 patient (1.7%) requested their VPC to be converted to F2F due to poor symptom control.

Our study showed patients reported high satisfaction ratings for both F2F clinics and VPCs, with prior experience of VPCs affecting patients’ future preferences. Only 1.7% of F2F patients converted to VPCs declined their virtual appointment. Our results support future use of VPCs.

Background. Both minimally invasive surgery(MIS) and computer-assisted surgery(CAS) in total knee arthroplasty have been scientifically linked with surgical benefits. However, the long-term results of these techniques are still controversial. Most surgeons assessed the surgical outcomes with regard to knee alignment and range of motion, but these factors may not reflect subjective variables, namely patient satisfaction. Purpose. To compare satisfaction and functional outcomes between two technical procedures in MIS total knee arthroplasty, namely computer-assisted MIS and conventional MIS procedure, operated on a sample group of patients after 10 years. Methods. Seventy cases of posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses were implanted using a computer-assisted system and were compared to seventy-four cases of matched total knee prostheses of the same implant using conventional technique. Both groups underwent arthrotomy by 2 centimeter limited quadriceps exposure minimally invasive surgery (2 cm Quad MIS). At an average of ten years after surgery, self-administered patient satisfaction and WOMAC scales were administered and analyzed. Results. Demographic data of both groups including sex, age, preoperative WOMAC and post-operative duration were not statistically different. Post-operative WOMAC for the computer-assisted group was 38.94±5.68, while the conventional one stood at 37.89±6.22. The median of self-administered patient satisfaction scales of the computer-assisted group was 100 (min37.5-max100), while the conventional one was 100 (min25-max100). P-value was 0.889. There was 1 re-operative case in the conventional MIS group due to peri-prosthetic infection which was treated with debridement, polyethylene exchanged and intravenous antibiotics. Conclusion. The long-term outcomes of computer-assisted MIS total knee arthroplasty are not superior to that of the conventional MIS technique. Computer assisted MIS total knee arthroplasty is one of the treatment options for osteoarthritis of the knee that has comparable levels of satisfaction to the conventional MIS technique

Background. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients with knee partial thickness cartilage loss have inferior functional performance compared to those with full thickness loss. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate on the association between postoperative patients' joint awareness and satisfaction and preoperative radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) Ahlbäck grade in subjects undergoing robotic arm-assisted UKA. Methods. This retrospective observational study includes 675 patients (681 knees) undergoing robotic arm-assisted UKA at two centres between January 2014 and May 2019. Pre-operatively, knee radiographs were performed, and Ahlbäck OA grade was measured by two independent observers. Post-operatively, patients were administered the Forgotten-Joint-Score-12 (FJS-12) and 5-Level-Likert-Scale to assess joint awareness and satisfaction. Postoperative complications and revisions were recorded. Correlations were described between FJS-12, satisfaction and OA grade by means of an adjusted multivariate statistical analysis. Results. A total of 574 patients (580 UKAs) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 3.6 years post-operatively (85.2% follow-up rate; min. 12, max. 75 months). Nine UKAs were revised. Primary or secondary medial knee OA was the preoperative diagnosis in 538 cases, osteonecrosis was present in 42 cases. Cases were divided based on their preoperative Ahlbäck grade in Group A (joint space narrowing, Ahlbäck 1, 279 cases), Group B (joint space obliteration or minor bone attrition, Ahlbäck 2 and 3, 197 cases) and Group C (moderate or severe bone attrition, Ahlbäck 4 and 5, 104 cases). Moderate to severe OA grades (Group B and C) were associated with higher probability of higher postoperative FJS-12 compared to joint space narrowing group (Odds Ratio 1.6 and 1.7, respectively, p<0.05). No associations were described between OA grade and patients' satisfaction. Conclusions. Patients with preoperative joint space obliteration and minor to severe bone attrition have higher probability of a having a forgotten joint after robotic arm-assisted UKA, compared to those without full cartilage thickness loss

Introduction. A total knee replacement is a proven cost-effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, with a positive effect on pain and function. However, only 80% of the patients are satisfied after surgery. It is known that high preoperative expectations and residual postoperative pain are important determinants of satisfaction, but also malalignment, poor function and disturbed kinematics can be a cause. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between the preoperative function and the postoperative patient reported outcomes PROMs) as well as the influence of the postoperative functional rehabilitation on the PROMs. Methods. 57 patients (mean 62,9j ± 10,6j), who suffer from knee osteoarthritis and who were scheduled for a total knee replacement at our centre, participated in this study. The range of motion of the knee, the muscle strength of the M. Quadriceps and the M. Hamstrings and the functional parameters (‘stair climbing test’ (SCT), ‘Sit to stand’ (STS) and ‘6 minutes walking test’ (6MWT)) were measured the night before surgery, ±6 months and ±1 year after surgery. This happened respectively with the use of a goniometer, HHD 2, stopwatch and the ‘DynaPort Hybrid’. Correlations between pre- and postoperative values were investigated. Secondly, a prediction was made about the influence of the preoperative parameters on on the subjective questionnaires (KOOS, OXFORD and KSS) as well as a linear and logistic regression. Results. 6 Months after surgery, an improvement of all parameters for ROM, muscle strength and functional status was found. With a significant difference for the active and passive ROM toward knee flexion (p=0.007;p=0.008), asymmetry in active and passive ROM toward flexion between the healthy leg and the leg with the TKA (p=0.001;p=0.001), Quadriceps- and Hamstrings strength (p=0.001;p<0.001), time of the STS test (p=0.012), time sit-stand (p=0.002), time stand-sit (p=0.001;p<0.001), all parameters for the 6MWT and the time of the SCT (p=0.001). Regarding the prediction model, the 6month PROMs can be predicted by some parameters for the 6MWT (distance (p=0.001), gait steps (p=0.002) and step time TKA (p=0.007)). These parameters are predictors for the score on the subscales ‘symptoms’ and ‘pain’ of the KOOS questionnaire. 1 Year after surgery, there is an improvement of all parameters, except for the active and passive ROM toward knee extension. However, these differences are not significant. The 1 year PROMs can only be predicted by the muscle strength (Quadriceps- and Hamstrings strength (p=0.026; p=0.039) and the asymmetry in Quadriceps strength between the healthy leg and the leg with the TKA (p=0.031)). The score on the subscale ‘pain’ can be predicted based on the parameters mentioned above. Conclusion. Patient satisfaction after TKA is a multivariate model. Regarding the functional outcome, we could find that there is a correlation between the muscle force, walking distance and the PROMs. More research is currently being done to create a better prediction model and investigate the correlations more thoroughly

Patient satisfaction is a driving force behind setting up and developing day case procedures. Ten months ago a service for day surgery SCARF procedures was set up in Torbay day surgery unit. We analysed patient pre and post operative pain scores and patient satisfaction scores in respect to pain, appearance and overall satisfaction. A questionnaire was sent to all sixty patients who had undergone a SCARF osteotomy in day surgery. Outcomes assessed were: reason for SCARF osteotomy; adequate preoperative information; pain scores pre and post operatively; satisfaction scores and admission rates. 53 patients responded (88% response rate). 79% of patients had their operation for pain, 19% for appearance and footwear, and 2% for function of their foot. 100% of patients were given adequate information by the surgeon preoperatively and 27% also used other sources for information. 62% of patients scored 6 or more on a linear pain score preoperatively. 85% of patients have a current pain score of 0 or 1. 87% were highly satisfied (scoring 9 or 10 on linear scale) with the outcome regarding their pain, 83% highly satisfied with appearance and 72% highly satisfied with function despite the questionnaire being completed less than one year post surgery. 83% of patients were highly satisfied with the overall procedure and 91% said they would have a SCARF as a day case procedure again. 9 patients were admitted, 3 due to living alone, 3 for wound problems and 3 for post anaesthetic problems including pain, nausea and vomiting. From these figures we concluded that SCARF osteotomy in day surgery is a successful, feasible and worthwhile undertaking in our unit. We used the questionnaires and results to further analyse our service and we have made modifications to improve it. We have now put in place a dedicated anaesthetist with an interest in foot and ankle blocks, as well as a comprehensive post operative analgesic regime and a stringent day surgery protocol. We now run a prospective questionnaire from clinic, including AAOFAS scores, to continue analysis of our service. With these changes in place we would like to see our satisfaction scores rising towards 100%

INTRODUCTION. Successful clinical outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) depend on component positioning, soft tissue balance and lower limb alignment, all of which can be difficult to achieve using manual instrumentation. A new robotic-guided technology has been shown to improve postoperative implant positioning and lower limb alignment in UKA but so far no studies have reported clinical results of robotic-assisted medial UKA. Goal of this study therefore was to assess outcomes of robotic-assisted medial UKA in a large cohort of patients at short-term follow-up. METHODS. This multicenter study with IRB approval examines the survivorship and satisfaction of this robotic-assisted procedure coupled with an anatomically designed UKA implant at a minimum of two-year follow-up. A total of 1007 patients (1135 knees) underwent robotic-assisted surgery for a medial UKA from six surgeons at separate institutions in the United States. All patients received a fixed-bearing metal backed onlay implant as the tibial component between March 2009 and December 2011 (Figure 1). Each patient was contacted at minimum two-year follow-up and asked a series of five questions to determine implant survivorship and patient satisfaction. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and worst-case scenario analysis was performed whereby all patients were considered as revision when they declined study participation. Revision rates were compared in younger and older patients (age cut-off 60 years) and in patients with different body mass index (body mass index cut-off 35 kg/m. 2. ). Two-sided chi-square tests were used to compare these groups. RESULTS. Data was collected for 797 patients (909 knees) with an average follow-up of 29.6 months (range: 22 – 52 months). At 2.5-years follow-up, eleven knees were reported as revised, which resulted in a survivorship of 98.8% (Figure 2). Thirty-five patients declined to participate in the study yielding a worst-case survivorship of 96.0%. Higher revision rates were seen in younger patients (2.60% versus 0.93%, p = 0.09) and in morbidly obese patients (3.36% versus 0.91%, p = 0.03). Of all patients without revision, 92% was either very satisfied or satisfied with their knee function (Figure 3). CONCLUSION. In this multicenter study, robotic-assisted UKA was found to have high survivorship and satisfaction rate at short-term follow-up. Prospective comparison studies with longer follow-up are necessary in order to compare survivorship and satisfaction rates of robotic-assisted UKA to conventional UKA and robotic-assisted UKA to total knee arthroplasty. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Purpose. To examine how patients viewed the outcome of their joint replacement at least one year post surgery. Emphasis was placed on investigating the relative influence of ongoing pain and functional limitation on patient satisfaction. Method. Questionnaire based assessment of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), patient satisfaction, and need for reoperation in a group of 10,000 patients who had undergone primary unilateral knee replacement between April and December 2003. Questionnaires were linked to the NJR database to provide data on background demographics, clinical parameters and intraoperative surgical information for each patient. Data was analysed to investigate the relationship between the OKS, satisfaction rate and the background factors. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to establish which factors influenced patient satisfaction. Results. 87.4% patients returned questionnaires. Overall 81.8% indicated they were satisfied with their knee replacement, with 7.0% unsatisfied and 11.2% unsure. The mean OKS varied dependent upon patients' satisfaction (satisfied=22.0, unsatisfied=41.7, unsure=35.2). These differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). Regression modelling showed that patients with higher scores relating to the pain and function elements of the OKS had lower levels of satisfaction (p<0.001) and that ongoing pain was a stronger predictor of lower levels of satisfaction. Other predictors of lower levels of satisfaction included female gender (p<0.05), a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis (p=0.02) and unicondylar replacement (p=0.002). Differences in satisfaction rate were also observed dependent upon age and ASA grade. 609 patients (7.4%) had undergone further surgery and 1476 patients (17.9%) indicated another procedure was planned. Both the OKS and satisfaction rates were significantly better in patients who had not suffered complications. Conclusion. This study highlights a number of clinically important factors that influence patient satisfaction at one year following TKR. These should act as a benchmark of UK practice and be a baseline for peer comparison between institutions

Purpose. To evaluate patient satisfaction and expectations of surgery following forefoot arthroplasty. Methods. Between October 1993 and June 1999, forefoot arthroplasty (Kate/Kessel/Kay procedure) was performed or directly supervised by the senior author (D. McBride) in a cohort of 55 patients. All had inflammatory arthritis and had failed non-operative management. The clinical result was assessed using a self-administered patient satisfaction questionnaire. The questionnaire asked patients to rate their level of satisfaction in terms of pain relief, wound healing, stiffness and appearance. The patients expectations from the surgery in terms of their level of disability and the achievement of the operation in addition to their pain experience following their operation was assessed. Results. Median time to follow-up was 41 months (range seven to seventy-seven). Forty-three of the 55 patients returned the completed questionnaire. The median age at operation of the respondents was 59 years (range 42 to 69) compared with 49 years (range 44 to 63) for the non-respondents. Of the 43 respondents, 30 were female and 13 male. In terms of their expectations of the surgery, 20 (47%) stated that the operation had achieved what they had expected while 10 (23%) considered the operation to have achieved more than they had expected. The level of disability following their operation was as expected in 21 (49%), more than expected in 11 (26%) and less than expected in four (9%). 23 (55%) noted no change to their walking capacity while it had increased in 11 (26%) and decreased in eight (19%). There were two wound haematomas, five superficial wound infections and three cases of delayed wound healing which extended the post-operative hospital stay. Seventy-nine percent of patients however reported complete satisfaction with their wound healing. In those patients that had reported having had pain (n=31) at some time following their operation, two (7%) had experienced it for less than seven days, four (13%) for between one and four weeks, one (3%) for between one and three months and 23 (77%) for more than three months. Conclusions. Overall patients were generally satisfied with their operation in terms of pain relief, wound healing and appearance. Additionally, in the majority of patients, the achievements of the procedure and the associated disability were as expected. Previous authors have outlined the various surgical factors, which are said to lead to a good outcome. Whilst it is important to bear these factors in mind we have found that some of our patients appeared to have a good result when these criteria were not met. While other patients meeting these criteria were not necessarily satisfied. This suggests areas for further research

Objectives:. To establish the demand, referral pathways, utility and patient satisfaction of a physiotherapy led post operative spinal surgery review clinic. Methods:. From July 2014 to January 2015 a pilot physiotherapy led clinic was established. The following clinic data was collected: number of patients reviewed, surgical procedure, outcome of clinic assessment, numbers requiring further investigation, numbers requiring review in the consultant led clinic and adverse events. A patient satisfaction survey was also administered to all English speaking patients. Patients were asked to rate the ease of getting through to the service by phone, length of wait, time spent with the clinician, answers to questions, explanation of results, advice about exercise and return to activities, the technical skills of the clinician, their personal manner and their overall visit. Data was anonymised and inserted into an excel spreadsheet for analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was undertaken. Results:. 28 patients were reviewed in the pilot clinic. 17 (61%) patients were reviewed and discharged. 11 (39%) patients required discussion with the consultant. The outcome was: Referral for further imaging: n=5 (18%), referral to other specialist: n=2 (6%), consultant led OPD clinic review n=4 (14%) and surgical review of wound n=1 (4%). 84% (n=21/25) of eligible patients completed a post operative satisfaction survey. 86% (n= 18/21) rated their overall visit as excellent. There were no adverse events reported. Conclusion:. The pilot clinic has informed the development of a permanent physiotherapy led post op clinic in the National Neurosurgical Spinal Service and demonstrates the value of interdisciplinary care in this population

A postal questionnaire was sent to 10 000 patients more than one year after their total knee replacement (TKR). They were assessed using the Oxford knee score and were asked whether they were satisfied, unsure or unsatisfied with their TKR. The response rate was 87.4% (8231 of 9417 eligible questionnaires) and a total of 81.8% (6625 of 8095) of patients were satisfied. Multivariable regression modelling showed that patients with higher scores relating to the pain and function elements of the Oxford knee score had a lower level of satisfaction (p < 0.001), and that ongoing pain was a stronger predictor of this. Female gender and a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis were found to be predictors of lower levels of patient satisfaction. Differences in the rate of satisfaction were also observed in relation to age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and the type of prosthesis. This study has provided data on the Oxford knee score and the expected levels of satisfaction at one year after TKR. The results should act as a benchmark of practice in the United Kingdom and provide a baseline for peer comparison between institutions

In a prospective multicentre study we investigated variations in pain management used by knee arthroplasty surgeons in order to compare the differences in pain levels among patients undergoing total knee replacements (TKR), and to compare the effectiveness of pain management protocols. The protocols, peri-operative levels of pain and patient satisfaction were investigated in 424 patients who underwent TKR in 14 hospitals. The protocols were highly variable and peri-operative pain levels varied substantially, particularly during the first two post-operative days. Differences in levels of pain were greatest during the night after TKR, when visual analogue scores ranged from 16.9 to 94.3 points. Of the methods of managing pain, the combined use of peri-articular infiltration and nerve blocks provided better pain relief than other methods during the first two post-operative days. Patients managed with peri-articular injection plus nerve block, and epidural analgesia were more likely to have higher satisfaction at two weeks after TKR. This study highlights the need to establish a consistent pain management strategy after TKR

Background. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a proven and cost-effective treatment for osteoarthritis. Despite the good to excellent long-term results, some patients remain dissatisfied. Our study aimed at establishing a predictive model to aid patient selection and decision-making in TKA. Methods. Using data from our prospective arthroplasty outcome database, 113 patients were included. Pre- and postoperatively, the patients completed 107 questions in 5 questionnaires: KOOS, OKS, PCS, EQ-5D and KSS. First, outcome parameters were compared between the satisfied and dissatisfied group. Secondly, we developed a new prediction tool using regression analysis. Each outcome score was analysed with simple regression. Subsequently, the predictive weight of individual questions was evaluated applying multiple linear regression. Finally, 10 questions were retained to construct a new prediction tool. Results. Overall satisfaction rate in this study was found to be 88%. We identified a significant difference between the satisfied and dissatisfied group when looking at the preoperative questionnaires. Dissatisfied patients had more preoperative symptoms (such as stiffness), less pain and a lower QOL. They were more likely to ruminate and had a lower preoperative KSS satisfaction score. The developed prediction tool consists of 10 simple, but robust questions. Sensitivity was 97% with a positive predictive value of 93%. Conclusions. Based upon preoperative parameters, we were able to partially predict satisfaction and dissatisfaction after TKA. After further validation this new prediction tool for patient satisfaction following TKA may allow surgeons and patients to evaluate the risks and benefits of surgery on an individual basis and help in patient selection

Pre-operative variables are increasingly being used to determine eligibility for total knee replacement (TKR). This study was undertaken to evaluate the relationships, interactions and predictive capacity of variables available pre- and post-operatively on patient satisfaction following TKR. Using nationally collected patient reported outcome measures and data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales, we identified 22 798 patients who underwent TKR for osteoarthritis between August 2008 and September 2010. The ability of specific covariates to predict satisfaction was assessed using ordinal logistic regression and structural equational modelling. Only 4959 (22%) of 22 278 patients rated the results of their TKR as ‘excellent’, despite the majority (71%, n = 15 882) perceiving their knee symptoms to be much improved. The strongest predictors of satisfaction were post-operative variables. Satisfaction was significantly and positively related to the perception of symptom improvement (operative success) and the post-operative EuroQol-5D score. While also significant within the models pre-operative variables were less important and had a minimal influence upon post-operative satisfaction. The most robust predictions of satisfaction occurred only when both pre- and post-operative variables were considered together. These findings question the appropriateness of restricting access to care based on arbitrary pre-operative thresholds as these factors have little bearing on post-operative satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1359–65

Aim: To assess pain control, functional outcome and patient satisfaction following day surgery ACL reconstruction. We report the results of 60 consecutive primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed by a single operator at King’s College Hospital Day surgery unit. A “3 in 1” nerve block was used after general anaesthesia. Semitendinosis and gracilis were harvested from the ipsilateral side, doubled and implanted arthroscopically. Patients were discharged the same day with oral analgesia. The mean age was 34.7 years old (range 18–58). Mean period between injury and reconstruction was 26.9 months (range 6–63 months). Mean follow-up was 38 months (range 7–86 months). Average post operative pain score was 3.86 with an average analgesic requirement of 11.2 days (range 0–50 days) Mean Modified Lysholm score was 85.63 (range 31–100) and mean IKDC score was 79.83 (range 37–100). In conclusion we found that following day surgery ACL reconstruction, pain relief was adequate in most cases, functional outcome was rated good or excellent by 78% of patients and 91% were satisfied with the overall service

Background. With the rising demand for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), there has been an emphasis on reducing the revision burden and improving patient outcomes. Although studies have shown that primary THA effectively minimizes pain and restores normal hip function for activities of daily living, many younger patients want to participate in more demanding activities after their operation. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between age, gender and patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Methods. With IRB approval, 2 groups of subjects were enrolled in this study: (i) 143 patients at an average of 25 months (range 10–69 months) post-primary THA, and (ii) 165 control subjects with no history of hip surgery or hip pathology. All subjects were assigned to one of four categories according to their age and gender: Group A: 40–60 year old males (31 THA; 42 Controls), Group B: 40–60 year old females (25 THA; 53 Controls), Group C: 60–80 year old males (35 THA; 25 Controls), and Group D: 60–80 year old females (36 THA; 23 Controls). Each patient completed a self-administered Hip Function Questionnaire (HFQ) which assessed each subject's satisfaction, expectations, symptoms and ability to perform a series of 94 exercise, recreational and daily living activities. These included participation in work-out activities, adventure and water sports, running and biking, and contact and team sports. Each participant was also asked their activity frequency, symptom prevalence and satisfaction with their hip in performing each activity. Results. When compared to controls, more THA patients reported at least weekly pain (20% vs. 7% p=0.001), stiffness (16% vs. 9% p=0.06), and dependence on analgesics at least weekly (8% vs. 5% p=0.42). Males age 40–60 were the only subgroup to differ significantly from their comparators in regards to pain, stiffness, or analgesic use (pain: 29% vs. 7% p=0.02; stiffness: 29% vs. 5% p=0.007; analgesics: 19% vs. 2% p=0.04). Looking at frequency of pain, more controls were dissatisfied than THA patients (64% vs 21% p=0.02). There were 12% of THA patients reporting their hip does not feel normal compared to 6% of controls (p=0.06); elderly males reported this more frequently than controls (p=0.016) and their elderly female counterparts (p=0.028). Of the effect modifiers tested, sensation of an abnormal hip (p=0.03) and frequent stiffness (p=0.003) portend lower satisfaction ratings while history of THA leads to better satisfaction rating vs. Control (p< 0.0001). Age and sex groups (p=0.33), the presence of pain (p=0.13), and analgesic use (p=0.16) were not significant modifiers. Discussion. Residual symptoms, especially stiffness, and the sensation that their hip is not normal after THA are negatively impact patient satisfaction, yet they are not uncommon in THA patients. Young THA males tend to experience more postoperative symptoms, however they remain satisfied and tolerate these symptoms well. Older THA males are less likely to report a normal feeling hip, but are generally satisfied with the outcome of THA

Introduction: Foot and ankle involvement in rheumatoid arthritis is common. Pain and disability secondary to planovalgus deformity and the arthritic process are difficult to control with conservative measures. Arthroplasty of the ankle is associated with high failure rates and does not completely correct the deformity. Arthrodesis of the hindfoot is a good option to alleviate pain, correct the deformity and improve functional ability, however has not been well reported in the literature. Aims: To determine change in quantitative measures of patient health, pain and functional ability following hindfoot arthrodesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and to assess patient satisfaction postoperatively. Methods: 24 consecutive additive hindfoot arthrodeses were performed by a single surgeon on 22 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients were assessed preoperatively using the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and pain scores. These assessments were repeated at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, with an additional satisfaction questionnaire. Results: There was a marked and sustained improvement in the post-operative SF-12, MOXFQ and pain scores, with 71% of patients reporting no pain at 12 months. 19 out of 22 patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the operation. Bony union was achieved in all patients, both on clinical and radiological criteria. Most patients returned to normal footwear, some with slight modification to facilitate a more normal gait cycle. Conclusions: This study shows that additive hindfoot arthrodesis can be a very effective procedure in the management of moderate to severe ankle and hind-foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis. Patients should be counselled regarding the considerable recovery period; however significant improvement in the patient’s general health, foot function and pain can be expected

Purpose: An audit was undertaken to evaluate the patients’ experience of foot surgery at the great Western Hospital in 2004 following the appointment of a podiatric surgeon to the orthopaedic department. Method: The first 100 patients that were operated on by the podiatric surgeon (Group 1) were matched by OPCS code to a randomly selected patient cohort that had been operated on by orthopaedic surgeons (Group 2). All patients were at a minimum of 6 months post-surgery (range 6–10 months Gp. 1, 11–20 months Gp. 2). The audit department sent out an anonymous questionnaire relating to the patients’ experience both before and after their surgery as well as current levels of satisfaction with the outcome of their surgery. Results: The response rate was 64% in Gp.1 and 68% in Gp.2. The patients’ overall satisfaction with the result of their foot surgery was determined using a Likert scale and the results can be seen in Table 1. Patients in the podiatric surgical group were significantly more satisfied with the result of their foot surgery than those in the orthopaedic group (p< 0.008; Mann Whitney U test). Similar statistically significant differences were also seen between the two groups relating to patient satisfaction with their pre and post-operative consultations and information concerning their proposed surgery and its outcome. Conclusion: The results of this audit suggest that the satisfaction of patients following foot surgery can rise significantly following the appointment of a podiatric surgeon to a general hospital orthopaedic department

Revision surgery for pelvic discontinuity in the presence of bone loss is challenging. The cup-cage reconstruction option has become popular for the management of pelvic discontinuity in the recent years. The aim of this study was to review the clinical, radiological and patient reported outcomes with the use of cup cage construct for pelvic discontinuity at our institution. Twenty-seven patients (27 cup-cage reconstructions) were identified at median 6-year (minimum 2 year, maximum 10 years) follow up. Eight were female patients. The median age was 77 years [mean 72, range 37–90, SD 13.6]. There were 5 deaths and 2 were lost to follow up. Two patients were converted to excision arthroplasty; one for infection and one for failure of the construct. A further 3 patients required revision for instability but the cup cage construct was not revised (2 revisions of cemented cups to a constrained cup and one revision of proximal modular component of the femoral prosthesis). Revision of the cup cage construct was not necessary in any of these cases. We noted excellent pain relief (mean WOMAC pain 85.6) and good functional outcome (mean WOMAC function 78.2, mean UCLA 5, mean OHS 78.6). Patient satisfaction with regards pain relief; function and return to activities were noted to be excellent. Radiological changes were noted in further 4 patients (cup migration in one case; fracture of ischial spike in one case and breakage of the cage screws in 2 patients). No migration of the construct was noted in any of the cases. In conclusion, the cup cage construct is an excellent method of dealing with complex pelvic discontinuity. Our study suggests a low failure rate; high patient satisfaction and pain relief and moderate functional outcome at median 6 year follow up

Purpose: To document outcomes and patient satisfaction in relation to the incision used following clavicle fracture fixation. In literature, the incidence of incisional numbness following operative fixation of clavicle fractures is reported to be between 7–29%. Such wound related problems contribute significantly to the dissatisfaction of patients with operatively treated clavicle fractures. Wound related problems can be bothersome and disabling and this is poorly documented. Method: All primary clavicle fractures treated with plating at the Alfred Hospital between 01/06/2003 and 01/06/2006 were included in the study. Patients were asked to complete paper-based questionnaires assessing satisfaction, pain, scar satisfaction, presence of numbness and the degree of disability following clavicle fixation. Their clinical notes and X-rays were reviewed for evaluation. The study sample was then divided into two groups; horizontal incision versus vertical incision then the data was analysed. Results: The response rate was 65% (35/54). 74% of patients reported as having “good” or better outcome following their clavicle fracture fixation. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores. However, there were statistically significant differences observed in the presence of numbness (vertical 21% versus horizontal 62%) and the disability from the numbness between the two incision types. Overall satisfaction between the two groups was also significantly different. Conclusion: This study confirms that scar-related problems significantly affect the satisfaction following plating of clavicle fractures and numbness appears to be one of the most significant factors. Vertical incisions appear to reduce the incidence of numbness and lead to better patient satisfaction. Our results suggest that vertical incision is an attractive alternative approach in clavicle fracture fixation

Purpose of the study: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is associated with higher mortality than primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA). The functional outcome after rTHA is globally satisfactory but less so than with primary implantation. Nevertheless, data are scarce. Patients undergoing revision procedures are older and have more co-morbid conditions. In this context, we evaluated quality-of-life and patient satisfaction five years after implantation, comparing rTHA versus pTHA. We analyzed the impact of age, obesity, and co-morbid conditions. Material and methods: The study cohort included all patients undergoing pTHA (n=471) OR rTHA (n=124) in our unit between 1996 and 2000. Five years postoperatively, we noted the Harris hip score (HHS) and patient satisfaction, assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 1 to 10. Results: The rTHA patients were older (72 yeras versus 68 years, p=0.004), more frequently obese (BMI30: 33% versus 19%, p=0.003) and presented more co-morbid conditions involving medical ( 2: 46% versus 21%, p< 0.001) and orthopedic ( 2: 13% versus 7%, p=0.053) problems. Five years after surgery, quality-of-life and patient satisfaction were much lower after rTHA than after pTHA (HHS < 70; 31% versus 9%, p< 0.001; satisfaction score 8: 68% versus 85%, p< 0.001). Adjustment for the preoprative status (ASA, medical and orthopedic comorbidity, BMI, gender, age) attenuated these differences which nevertheless remained significant [non-adjusted HHS difference: 11.5 (95%CI: 7.4–15.7); adjusted difference: 8.8 (95%CI: 5.5–12.1)]. In both groups, a low HHS was associated with BMI ≥ 30, poor preoperative function, 2 joints affected, elderly age. Obesity was associated with even poorer results after rTHA than after pTHA (non-adjusted difference, p=0.026). Discussion: Quality-of-life and patient satisfaction at five years were clearly poorer after rTHA than after pTHA. This is in agreement with data in the literature. The difference is explained in particular by greater patient age and more associated comorbidities for rTHA. Obesity is a prognostic factor which is more unfavorable after rTHA than after pTHA. Conclusion: Considering the risks and benefits of revision surgery, it is important to recognize not only the surgical factors but also the characteristic features of the patients

Introduction

Traditionally, limb reconstruction physiotherapy consisted of face to face group rehabilitation. During the COVID-19 pandemic OP physiotherapy service provision was significantly reduced and delivery methods limited due to staff redeployment, service prioritisation and restriction of footfall within the hospital. A virtual exercise group for acute limb reconstruction patients was set up to maintain contact and clinical support.

Aim: Osteoarthritis of the wrist is a well recognised cause of secondary carpal tunnel syndrome. The aim of the study is to compare the outcome following carpal tunnel decompression with regard to patient satisfaction. We compared the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression between patients with and with out osteoarthritis of the wrist. Patients and Methods: The study was done retrospectively. Clinical notes of all the patients who underwent carpal tunnel decompression over a period of 8 years were verified. Twenty four patients who underwent surgical decompression for carpal tunnel syndrome secondary to osteoarthritis were identified by reviewing the notes and the radiographs. Control group consisted of 24 patients who under went carpal tunnel decompression but without osteoarthritis of the wrist. The control group was matched for age, sex, side, and neuro-physiological severity of the nerve compression. Clinical notes were verified to find whether the patients were satisfied with the symptom relief at the first post-operative follow up visit. Results: There were 24 patients in the group with osteoarthritis of the wrist. The mean age of the patients was 71 years (range 33–89 years). There were 19 females and five males. The right hand was involved in 17 patients and the left was involved in 7 patients. The control group with out osteoarthritis also had similar distribution regarding age sex side, and neuro-physiological severity of nerve conduction. In the group with osteoarthritis of the wrist 17(71%) patients reported the their symptom relief as satisfactory and the rest seven(29%) reported the results as unsatisfactory. In the control group 23(96%) patients reported their symptom relief as satisfactory and one (4%) reported their results as unsatisfactory (P= 0.0325). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction following surgical decompression in patients with secondary carpal tunnel syndrome due to osteoarthritis is significantly lower compared to patients with out osteoarthritis of the wrist. Patients with osteoarthritis of the wrist should be warned about the higher incidence of poor outcome prior to decompression

Introduction and aims. Low back pain is a common complaint, affecting up to one third of the adult population costing over £1 billion to the NHS each year and £3.5 billion to the UK economy in lost production. The demand for spinal injections is increasing allowing for advanced spinal physiotherapists to perform the procedure. The objective of this study was to investigate outcome following spinal injections performed by consultant spinal surgeon (n=40) and advanced spinal physiotherapists (ASP) (n=40) at our centre. Method and Materials. Data on 80 patients who had received caudal epidural (n=36), nerve root block (n=28) and facet joint injections (n=16) form August 2010 to October 2011 consented to be in the study. 40 patients in each group completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) before and 6 weeks after the procedure and patient satisfaction questionnaire investigating their experience and any complications related to the spinal injection retrospectively. The study included 32 males and 48 females. Mean age 57 years, range 21–88. [Consultant group M:17, F:23 mean age: 55, range 21–81. ASP group M:15, F:25 mean age 59, range 22–88]. Measures of patient satisfaction and outcome were obtained; using 2 tailed independent samples t-test with 95% confidence interval, statistical significance was investigated. Results. Data analysis shows that there are no significant differences (p>0.05) in either overall patient satisfaction or outcomes between patients of the surgeon vs physiotherapists. Patients of the surgeon were found to be more satisfied with the procedure itself (p< 0.05). Conclusion. Physiotherapists are able to provide spinal injections with equal efficacy to spinal surgeons, with no reduction in overall patient outcome. Benefits of this scheme include greater number of spinal injections performed. Therefore, reducing the overall waiting times. Further, multi-centre studies on larger populations are required to investigate injection treatment by physiotherapists

Introduction: The NHS Contract for Acute Services (April 2008), includes a requirement in Schedule 5 to report on patient reported outcome measures (PROMS). This sets out national standards for elective patients undergoing Primary Unilateral Total Hip Replacements (THR) and Total Knee Replacements (TKR). The recommended instruments for these procedures are the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores. Our aim was to assess whether these instruments accurately assess patient satisfaction and pain and whether a more efficient model could be used. Methods: All patients undergoing primary THR and TKR under the care of the senior author (DH) between Sept 07 – Sept 09 at the RHC Hospital were included in the study. The primary diagnosis in all patients was Osteo-arthritis. All Patients were operated on by DH using the same approach, implants and post-operative rehabilitation programme. Patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year post-operatively using the Oxford-12 joint specific score and also by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. The Oxford-12 and VAS scores were then compareded against one another for correlation using scatter-plots and regression analysis. Results:. Primary TKR:. At 6 weeks: Correlation for OKS and pain, OKS and satisfaction, Pain and satisfaction were r = 0.782, 0.736 and 0.796 respectively (p< 0.001). At 6 months: Correlation for OKS and pain, OKS and satisfaction, Pain and satisfaction were r = 0.718, 0.749 and 0.767 respectively (p< 0.001). At 1 year: Correlation for OKS and pain, OKS and satisfaction, Pain and satisfaction were r = 0.7, 0.703 and 0.793 respectively (p< 0.001) Primary THR:. At 6 weeks: Correlation for OHS and pain, OHS and satisfaction, Pain and satisfaction were r = 0.361, 0.309 and 0.477 respectively (p< 0.001). At 6 months: Correlation for OHS and pain, OHS and satisfaction, Pain and satisfaction were r = 0.596, 0.673 and 0.635 respectively (p< 0.001). At 1 year: Correlation for OHS and pain, OHS and satisfaction, Pain and satisfaction were r = 0.682, 0.636 and 0.862 respectively (p< 0.001). Conclusion: The Oxford-12 site specific score correlates extremely well with both VAS scores for pain and patient satisfaction at all time points post-operatively with all values showing a significant (p < 0.001) positive association. Similarly, pain and patient satisfaction scores demonstrate a strong positive association. We propose that rather than using the Oxford-12 score as part of the PROMS assessment, a simple VAS for pain and satisfaction would provide adequate information and would be easier for patients to complete

Background. Hip replacement surgery is an effective treatment, however quantitative outcome does not necessarily delineate the true picture. It is important to triangulate data methods in order to ascertain important contextual factors that may influence patient perception. Aims. The aim of the current study was to explore the patient perception on resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA) and mini-hip arthroplasty (MHA) in a unique cohort where each patient has received a resurfacing on one side and a mini-hip on the contralateral side using both quantitative and qualitative measures (Fig. 1). Materials and methods. We identified patients in our Practice database that had undergone RHA on one side and MHA in the opposite hip. All prostheses were implanted by two experienced surgeons using a posterior approach and followed a standard anaesthetic protocol, post-operative care and rehabilitation guidelines. The patients received Cormet 2000 hip resurfacing and MiniHip (Corin®, Ciencester, UK) implants. Data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at weeks 6, 12, 26 52 and annually thereafter. The data included demographic details, mHHS (modified Harris Hip Score), patient satisfaction and a qualitative semi-structured interview. Data analysis was done using both quantitative (descriptive statistics, student's t-test) and qualitative (constant comparative method of grounded theory). Results. There were 24 hips in 12 patients with mean age of 63.6 years (range 42,81) and a mean follow-up of 5.3 years (SD 4.2). The mean mHHS in pre-operative and one-year post-operative period for RHA was 50.9 (SD 22.9, range 9,71) and 82.6 (SD 11.2, range 67,91) respectively with a mean improvement of 32.9. The mean mHHS in pre-operative and one-year post-operative period for MHA was 47.83 (SD 14.6, range 20,62) and 83.2 (SD 27.3 range 53,94) respectively with mean improvement of 35.3. There was no significant difference in mHHS in the two groups (p=0.26). However, the qualitative analysis showed that a patient's perception of improvement did not always reflect the validated score improvement such as in mHHS. In 8/24 of arthroplasty cases the mHHS indicated a high return to functionality, however, interview highlighted perception of a reduction in certain aspects such as range of movement and ability to perform at a high-level such as competitive windsurfing (2/24), skiing (6/24) or martial arts (2/24). The results, therefore, suggest that the quantitative data is not sensitive enough to deduce return to function in a specialised subset of patients. The interviews indicate a marginal preference for resurfacing due to improved stability. However, the differential to the satisfaction with the mini hip was not sufficient for the potential metal ion problem to be ignored and therefore mini hip was shown to offer a reasonable bone-conserving alternative. Conclusions. Results indicate the need for more than just a quantitative score to demonstrate satisfaction and that RHA generally offers better results although when the metal ion problem is taken into account the MHA can offer sufficient function and satisfaction as an alternative

Home- based rehab is increasingly utilized to save costs but concerns have been raised about early hospital discharge and adverse clinical outcomes. This study compares the efficacy and patient satisfaction of home- based verses inpatient rehabilitation following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Despite concerns about early hospital discharge there was no difference in functional outcomes and in patient satisfaction with procedure at the primary endpoints, between the groups receiving home based verses inpatient rehabilitation. This study compares the efficacy and patient satisfaction of home- based verses inpatient rehabilitation following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Given that home- based rehab is less expensive, we would recommend the use of home based rehab protocols following elective primary TJA. Home- based rehab is increasingly utilized to save costs but concerns have been raised about early hospital discharge and adverse clinical outcomes. The groups were similar at baseline for patient demographics and WOMAC scores. At the six weeks, twelve weeks and one- year follow-up post TJA there was no statistically significant difference in WOMAC pain, physical function, stiffness and overall WOMAC scores. Both groups showed a trend of decrease in pain, stiffness, restriction in physical function over the follow-up period. Similarly, patient satisfaction scores at six, twelve weeks and one year did not show a statistically significant difference between the home versus inpatient group (P> 0.05). Two hundred and thirty-four patients were randomized to either home based or inpatient rehabilitation following TJA, using block randomization techniques. Standardized care pathways were followed for both procedures. All patients were evaluated at baseline (two weeks prior to surgery), six weeks, twelve weeks and one- year post surgery using standardized questionnaires. Primary outcomes were the self-reported WOMAC pain and function score and satisfaction in terms of improvement in pain and function. Despite concerns about early hospital discharge there was no difference in functional outcomes and in patient satisfaction with procedure at the primary endpoints, between the groups receiving home based verses inpatient rehabilitation. Funding: PSI

Purpose: To examine how patients viewed the outcome of their joint replacement at least one year post surgery. Emphasis was placed on investigating the relative influence of ongoing pain and functional limitation on patient satisfaction. Method: Questionnaire based assessment of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), patient satisfaction, and need for reoperation in a group of 10,000 patients who had undergone primary unilateral knee replacement between April and December 2003. Questionnaires were linked to the NJR database to provide data on background demographics, clinical parameters and intraoperative surgical information for each patient. Data was analysed to investigate the relationship between the OKS, satisfaction rate and the background factors. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to establish which factors influenced patient satisfaction. Results: 87.4% patients returned questionnaires. Overall 81.8% indicated they were satisfied with their knee replacement, with 7.0% unsatisfied and 11.2% unsure. The mean OKS varied dependent upon patients’ satisfaction (satisfied=22.04 (S.D 7.87), unsatisfied=41.70 (S.D 8.32), unsure=35.17 (S.D 8.24)). These differences were statistically significant (p< 0.001). Regression modelling showed that patients with higher scores relating to the pain and function elements of the OKS had lower levels of satisfaction (p< 0.001) and that ongoing pain was a stronger predictor of lower levels of satisfaction. Other predictors of lower levels of satisfaction included female gender (p< 0.05), a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis (p=0.02) and unicondylar replacement (p=0.002). Differences in satisfaction rate were also observed dependent upon age and ASA grade. 609 patients (7.4%) had undergone further surgery and 1476 patients (17.9%) indicated another procedure was planned. Both the OKS and satisfaction rates were significantly better in patients who had not suffered complications. Conclusion: This study highlights a number of clinically important factors that influence patient satisfaction following knee replacement. This information could be used when planning surgery to counsel patients and help form realistic expectations of the anticipated postoperative result

We have compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in three distinct diagnostic groups, using survival analysis as used by the United Kingdom national joint registers, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as recommended by Darzi in the 2008 NHS review, and transition and satisfaction questions. A total of 72 hemiarthroplasties, 19 for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with an intact rotator cuff, 22 for OA with a torn rotator cuff, and 31 for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), were followed up for between three and eight years. All the patients survived, with no revisions or dislocations and no significant radiological evidence of loosening. The mean new Oxford shoulder score (minimum/worst 0, maximum/best 48) improved significantly for all groups (p < 0.001), in the OA group with an intact rotator cuff from 21.4 to 38.8 (effect size 2.9), in the OA group with a torn rotator cuff from 13.3 to 27.2 (effect size 2.1) and in the RA group from 13.7 to 28.0 (effect size 3.1). By this assessment, and for the survival analysis, there was no significant difference between the groups. However, when ratings using the patient satisfaction questions were analysed, eight (29.6%) of the RA group were ‘disappointed’, compared with one (9.1%) of the OA group with cuff intact and one (7.7%) of the OA group with cuff torn. All patients in the OA group with cuff torn indicated that they would undergo the operation again, compared to ten (90.9%) in the OA group with cuff intact and 20 (76.9%) in the RA group. The use of revision rates alone does not fully represent outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder. Data from PROMs provides more information about change in pain and the ability to undertake activities and perform tasks. The additional use of satisfaction ratings shows that both the rates of revision surgery and PROMs need careful interpretation in the context of patient expectations

To assess patient following operative fixation of clavicle fractures. In the literature, the incidence of paraesthesia following operative fixation of clavicle fractures is reported to be between 7–29%. This problem can be bothersome to patients and the degree of disability is poorly documented. All clavicle fractures (67) treated operatively at the Alfred Hospital between 01/06/2003 and 01/06/2006 were included in the study. Patients were asked to complete paper based questionnaires assessing satisfaction, presence of numbness and degree of disability following clavicle operation. Additionally, they were followed up clinically to assess the area of numbness and scarring. The response rate was 65% (43/67). Most of the patients were satisfied with the operation and only 15% reported significant problems with the wound. Majority of patients returned to pre-morbid activities and employment. The degree of paraesthesia varied among respondents and it was associated with the type of incision used. There was little difference in patient satisfaction with regard to various surgical devices utilised. It is important to address wound complications such as scarring and paraesthesia when discussing operative treatments for patients with clavicle fractures. The results suggest that wound related problems can be frequent and a significant percentage of operatively managed patient experience long term numbness. It is possibly an under appreciated problem. Additionally our results suggest that vertical incisions achieve a more favourable outcome compared to horizontal incisions

Introduction. The advent of ambulatory total joint replacements has called for measures to reduce postoperative length of stay, while improving patient function and postoperative satisfaction. This prospective, randomized trial evaluated the efficacy of one-on-one preoperative physical therapy (PT) education with a supplemental web-based PT web-portal on discharge disposition, postoperative function and patient satisfaction after total joint replacement. Materials & Methods. Between February and June 2015, 126 patients underwent unilateral total knee (n=63) or total hip arthroplasty (n=63). All patients attended a group preoperative education (preopEd) class [standard of care] and were subsequently randomized into two groups. One group received no further education as per the standard of care [control; TKA= 31; THA=32] and the other received an in-person one-on-one preoperative PT education session (preopPTEd) as well as access to a web-portal during the postoperative period [experimental; TKA=32; THA=31]. Discharge disposition was attained from hospital records. Patient satisfaction and WOMAC scores were evaluated by a series of patient administered questionnaires. Results. The group that received preopPTEd trended towards a reduction in hospital length of stay compared to the current standard of care (2.4 days vs. 2.6 days; p=0.077). However, the group that received preopPTEd met the postoperative functional discharge requirements significantly faster (1.6 days vs. 2.7 days, respectively; p<0.001) and required fewer postoperative PT visits (3.3 vs. 4.4 visits respectively; p<0.001) than those who did not. With respect to satisfaction, patients who received the preopPTEd felt they were better prepared to leave the hospital postoperatively and were overall more satisfied with their postoperative education (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). The majority (69.8%) of patients who did not receive preopPTEd reported that they would have benefitted from additional preopPTEd. There were no clinically relevant improvements in the WOMAC subscores or total score between the groups. All findings were consistent in both the TKA and THA sub-groups. Conclusion. Patients who received the preopPTEd required fewer PT visits and met the postoperative functional PT discharge criteria faster than those who did not. Patients who received preopPTEd also reported being better prepared to leave the hospital after surgery and better overall satisfaction compared to the current standard of care. The one-on-one preoperative PT education session with supplemental web-portal education pathway may be an adjunct to help reduce postoperative length of stay for ambulatory total joint replacements

Introduction and aims. Cast immobilisation of paediatric forearm fractures has traditionally used plaster of Paris. Recently, synthetic casting materials have been used. There have been no studies comparing the efficacy of these two materials. The aim of this study is to investigate whether one material is superior for paediatric forearm fracture management. Methods. A single-centre prospective randomised trial of patients presenting to the Women's and Children's Hospital with acute fractures of the radius and/or ulna was undertaken. Patients were enrolled into the study on presentation to the Emergency Department and randomised by sealed envelope into either a fiberglass or plaster of Paris group. Patients then proceeded to a standardised method of closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Clinical follow-up occurred at one and six weeks post-immobilisation. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed following cast removal at six weeks. All clinical complications were recorded and cast indexes were calculated. Results. Initially 50 patients were recruited to the study, with equal randomisation. There were no significant differences between the patient demographics of the two groups. The results from this sample indicated an increase in clinical complications involving the plaster of Paris casting group. These complications included soft areas of plaster requiring revision, loss of reduction with some requiring re-manipulation and a high rate of cast spliting due to material swelling. The fractures that loss reduction had increased cast indices. Fibreglass casts were also preferred by patient and their families, with many observational comments regarding the light-weight and durable nature of the material. Conclusions. Cast immobilisation of paediatric forearm fractures is a common orthopaedic treatment. There is currently no evidence regarding the best material for casting. This study suggests that both clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are superior with fiberglass casts, we are continuing this study to enable greater power with our results

Aims: We aimed to compare conventional rigid cast immobilization with the semi-rigid functional treatment method with respect to calf muscle atrophy, ankle range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction in patients who had acute lateral ligament injury of the ankle. Methods: Sixty patients were randomized into the functional immobilization group (Group SC) or conventional belowthe- knee walking cast (Group R). Muscle atrophy was evaluated by axial Computerized Tomography and ankle ROM were recorded before and after treatment. A brief questionnaire for the evaluation of patient satisfaction was applied after the casts were removed. Results: A reduction in muscle area indicating atrophy was detected for both groups (p< 0.001). However, the atrophy was more pronounced in Group R for anterior and superþcial posterior muscle groups. There was also a reduction in ankle ROM for both groups. The loss of ROM for Group R was more evident and differences between the groups were statistically signiþcant. The patients who were treated with functional immobilization techniques were more satisþed. Mean score for Group SC was 67±12 where as it was 28±7 for Group R (p< 0.001). Conclusions: Functional immobilization has shown better results on patient satisfaction and ankle ROM. Although not statistically signiþcant, functional group also showed better results with respect to muscle atrophy for all muscle groups except the lateral. Regarding the previous literature on the effectiveness of functional immobilisation on ankle stability, this technique additionally brings advantages to the treatment of ankle ligamentous lesions with regard to patient satisfaction and facilitation in rehabilitation

Purpose. A comparison of patient satisfaction of service provided by independent sector treatment centres versus an index NHS hospital in total knee replacement surgery. Methods. Patients were all initially listed for total knee replacement (TKR) by a single consultant from the index NHS hospital, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary (DRI). Patients were sent a postal questionnaire and asked to rate the TKR service provided by a given hospital, based on recent inpatient experience. Questions covered quality of care delivered by hospital staff and quality of ward environment. Overall satisfaction was rated. Patients electing surgery under Patient Choice at an independent sector treatment centre (ISTC) were asked about factors that influenced their hospital choice. 100 consecutive patients undergoing TKR at DRI and 100 patients choosing ISTC hospitals were identified. All surgery occurred between April 2003 and September 2006. Results. Questionnaire response rates were 79% for DRI patients and 54% for ISTC. Overall patient satisfaction for TKR service was 95% for DRI and 87% for ISTC. An equal 61% rated the surgeons as excellent in both DRI and ISTC hospitals. Nurses and physiotherapists (& occupational therapists) both scored more highly in ISTC groups (Nurses 69% v 45%; physio/OT 57% v 35%). Ward environment rated excellent in 73% for ISTC and 24% for DRI. The most common reason for choosing ISTC was shorter waiting list (42%). Conclusion. ISTC hospitals scored more highly in terms of nurses, physiotherapy & occupational therapy, and ward environment. In part, this may arise from better staffing levels and newer facilities in the ISTC sector. Despite this, overall patient satisfaction for TKR service remained greater at the index NHS hospital. This suggests overall satisfaction depends on more complex factors than staff and ward environment. Further work is needed to compare objective clinical outcomes of TKR between hospital groups within the NHS

Purpose: Due to bed and resource constraints at the Royal University Hospital in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, we have seen an increase in utilization of the day surgery program for acute Orthopedic traumatic injuries in ambulatory patients. The purpose of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the Saskatoon Health Region Orthopedic trauma day surgery program by collecting data pertaining to wait-times, demographics, communication, coping skills at home and pain management. Method: A patient-oriented questionnaire was devised and administered to eligible adult patients presenting for day surgery Orthopedic Trauma procedures over a three month period. Inclusion criteria included age greater than 18 and written english comprehension. Between July 12 and October 2, 2009, 45 patients consented to participate. The questionnaire was formulated to encapsulate all the potential concerns associated with the day-surgery program, which included expected wait-times, pain control, and communication between the orthopedic surgeon and the patient. Demographics and actual wait-times were obtained from hospital data. Results: There was a marked discrepancy between the actual and anticipated waiting times for day surgery. However, 64% of the patients were still satisfied with the waiting times despite the difference. Seventy three percent of patients did not think that admission to hospital would lead to earlier surgery. There was an obvious difference in demographics with 53% of patients living outside city limits. Demographics played an important role in patient satisfaction. Patients living within the city limits had a better experience compared to patients living outside city limits. Patients did have difficulty managing at home. The overall satisfaction was 68% at the conclusion of the study. Conclusion: Patients were overall satisfied with the day surgery program. We have identified several areas where we can improve. This involve better pain management, better communication and assessment of the bio-socioeconomic circumstances of patients. We will also have a lower threshold for admitting non residents of Saskatoon. We will relay a more realistic timeframe for surgery, as calculated in the study, to patients

Purpose. The aim of the present study was to look at survivorship and patient satisfaction of a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with an all-polyethylene tibial component. Materials and Methods. We report the survivorship of 91 fixed bearing unicompartmental arthroplasties with all-polyethylene tibial components (Preservation DePuy UK), which were used for medial compartment osteoarthritis in 79 patients between 2004 and 2007. The satisfaction level of patients who had not undergone revision of the implant was also recorded. For comparison, we reviewed 49 mobile bearing unicompartmental arthroplasties (Oxford UKA Biomet UK Ltd), which had been used in 44 patients between 1998 and 2007. Results. Mean length of follow up of patients with the fixed bearing implant was 44.7 months (range 24 - 74 months) and for the mobile bearing replacement, the mean follow up was 67.6 months (24 - 119). In the fixed bearing design, at maximum follow up period of 74 months, 8 implants (8.8%) had been revised (or were listed for revision) to total knee replacement and in the mobile bearing design over the maximum follow up period of 119 months there had been only one revision (2.0%). Patients who had not undergone revision were asked if they were satisfied with their knee following the unicompartmental arthroplasty. In the fixed bearing design, 83.5% said that they were satisfied with the outcome of the operation compared to 93.9% of the patients receiving the mobile bearing design. Conclusion. We conclude that there is a higher incidence of revision of this fixed bearing design using an all-polyethylene tibial component compared to the mobile bearing design. We found that those patients who had not required revision had a lower rate of satisfaction with the fixed bearing compared to the mobile bearing design

Computer aided Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) surgery is known to improve implantation precision, but clinical trials have failed to demonstrate an improvement in survivorship or patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Our aim was to compare the risk of revision, PROMs and satisfaction rates between computer guided and THA implanted without computer guidance. We used the National Joint Registry dataset and linked PROMs data. Our sample included THAs implanted for osteoarthritis using cementless acetabular components from a single manufacturer (cementless and hybrid). An additional analysis was performed limiting the sample size to THAs using cementless stems (fully cementless). The primary endpoint was revision (of any component) for any reason. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis and an adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards model were used. 41683 non computer guided, and 871 (2%) computer guided cases were included in our cementless and hybrid analysis. 943 revisions were recorded in the non-guided and 7 in the computer guided group (adjusted Log-rank test, p= 0.028). Cumulative revision rate at 10 years was 3.88% (95%CI: 3.59 – 4.18) and 1.06% (95%CI: 0.45 – 2.76) respectively. Cox Proportional Hazards adjusted HR: 0.45 (95%CI: 0.21 – 0.96, p=0.038). In the fully cementless group, cumulative revision rate at 10 years was 3.99% (95%CI: 3.62 – 4.38) and 1.20% (95%CI: 0.52 – 3.12) respectively. Cox Proportional Hazards adjusted HR: 0.47 (95%CI: 0.22 – 1.01, p=0.053). There was no statistically significant difference in the 6-month Oxford Hip Score, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and success rates. Patient Satisfaction (single-item satisfaction outcome measure) was improved in the computer guided group but this finding was limited by a reduced number of responses. In this single manufacturer acetabular component analysis, the use of computer guided surgery was associated with a significant reduction in the early risk of revision. Causality cannot be inferred in view of the observational nature of the study, and further database and prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor. As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for independent 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the transepicondylar axis. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal.

Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise.

The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration.

In summary, the use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of post-operative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality.

Background: Back pain is often characterised by recurrent episodes and low patient satisfaction with care and there is little evidence about what constitutes improvement as perceived by the sufferer. Care by chiropractors has been associated with high patient satisfaction, often apparently out of proportion to other outcomes (. 1. ), but little is known about what actually contributes to this. Methods and results: Baseline questionnaires were completed by 965 patients with low back pain of all durations at the start of chiropractic treatment, with blinded follow-up at 6 weeks. Patients were asked about the commonly used functional and affective outcomes of: pain intensity, normal activity, work, affect on lifestyle, ability to control pain, anxiety and perceived depression. The contribution of change in these scores to overall improvement and satisfaction with care was evaluated by stepwise multiple regression. Pain intensity, work and ability to control pain predicted 27% of the variance in overall improvement, leaving 73% unexplained by any of the variables. Overall improvement predicted 57% of satisfaction leaving 43% unexplained. A 2-stage block regression to find out what factors other than overall improvement predicted satisfaction revealed that ability to carry out normal activities alone predicted only an additional 0.5% of this. (All relationships were significant at the 5% level or below.). Conclusions: Some of the overall improvement following chiropractic treatment for back pain was significantly predicted by functional outcomes alone. Very few items other than overall improvement predicted satisfaction. There is a need to consider what other factors constitute improvement and lead to satisfaction with care for low back pain

Introduction: Carpal tunnel decompression is the most commonly performed procedure in hand surgery. This study was done to assess the effectiveness and acceptability by patients of open carpal tunnel release under local anaesthetic and compare our results with previous published work from our department following alterations to our operative techniques. Methods: 92 carpal tunnel releases were performed on 80 patients over a four year period, 2001 to 2004. 55 were females and 25 were males. A patient satisfaction survey was done by a postal questionnaire which addressed opinion regarding preference for LA over GA, pain due to LA infiltration, effectiveness of LA, patient comfort during surgery, outcome of surgery and overall satisfaction with the procedure. In this cohort of patients we did not use a tourniquet which caused severe pain in 29% of cases in the previous study. We also administered LA with adrenaline using a dental syringe to reduce pain which was previously reported as severe in 20% of cases. Results: 62 patients replied to the questionnaire, a response rate of 77.5%. Preference for LA over GA was 90% as compared to 70% in the previous study. Pain due to tourniquet use was previously reported as severe in 29% of cases but this did not apply in this subset of patients. Pain due to infiltration of LA with a dental syringe was severe in 9% of cases compared to 20% with a 25G needle. Effectiveness of LA, outcome of surgery and overall satisfaction with the procedure remained unchanged. Conclusion: Carpal tunnel decompression is a quick, convenient, inexpensive and safe method of treatment. We have demonstrated that injecting LA with adrenaline using a dental syringe obviates the need for tourniquet and improves patients’ acceptability and tolerance of this procedure

Financial impact and patient satisfaction with four different anticoagulants for hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with a previous history of VTE- A prospective randomised trial. Introduction. New generation oral anticoagulants (dabigatran/rivaroxaban) have recently become available for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip and knee arthroplasty. Traditional therapies (warfarin/low molecular weight heparins) are less costly, but have several limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the financial impact of substituting enoxaparin and warfarin with newer therapies dabigatran and rivaroxaban. A secondary objective was to investigate patient satisfaction with these treatments. Methods. A randomised prospective study was conducted over a 12 month period. Patients with a history of VTE undergoing hip or knee replacement were randomised to receive one of four anticoagulants for five weeks post surgery. Information was gathered during the hospital stay and then post discharge, by telephone, for five weeks(35 days)to determine costs. The costs included cost of drug, nursing time, blood monitoring and transport costs. The patients were also asked to complete the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS). The DASS is a 26 item questionnaire which has 7 responses for each question. Results. Although dabigatran and rivaroxaban had higher drug acquisition costs, warfarin and enoxaparin were financially more costly overall. These additional costs were mainly due to increased blood monitoring and time for training and administration which is not required for newer therapies. DASS scores were significantly better with dabigatran (38.5±5.1) and rivaroxaban (38.6±8.3) compared to warfarin (71.8±16.2) and enoxaparin (68.5±14.2) (p< 0.001). This indicates more satisfaction for patients prescribed dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared to traditional therapies. Conclusion. The use of new generation oral anticoagulants has the potential to significantly reduce the financial burden of thromboprophylaxis on the NHS with an additional benefit of better patient satisfaction when compared to traditional therapies

Introduction: This study evaluates the effect on hospital length of stay (LOS) of patients receiving a total hip replacement (THR) as part of a patient centred approach. In order to meet the “18 week” target a pathway was developed by combining the latest research evidence with guidance from the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Methods: We prospectively studied the first 134 THR patients who followed the new pathway. The pathway included an enhanced pre-assessment process. Admission dates were mutually agreed and a predicted discharge date of 4 days was provided. All patients attended a pre-operative education session. Patients were admitted on the day of surgery with staggered admission times and followed an intensive physiotherapy program. The surgeons, surgical techniques, and discharge criteria all remained unchanged. Results: 100% of patients were admitted on the day of surgery and the average time between admission and start of surgery was 2hrs 41mins. All patients walked to theatre and 100% of patients received their first physiotherapy intervention within 18 hours post-operatively. The average length of stay was 3.85 days. 87% of patients went home on or before their predicted day of discharge. The patient feedback was excellent and satisfaction rates were very high. There were no alterations in surgical complication rates compared to before the pathway was introduced. Discussion: This decrease in LOS was dramatic and highly clinically significant. The average LOS for THR patients prior to commencing this new pathway was 7.5 days. High patient satisfaction rates indicate that by adopting a patient centred approach, significant decreases to LOS can be achieved alongside improving the quality of care. Pressure to meet the “18 week” target provided an opportunity to improve working practice as well as increasing surgical capacity

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the TEA. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal.

Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise.

The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration.

Given these ideals, to what extent are patients improved? The concept of reproducing bony anatomy is based on the pretext that form will dictate function, such that normal-leaning anatomy will tend towards normal-leaning kinematics. Therefore, we seek to evaluate knee function based on objective assessments of movement or kinematics.

The use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of post-operative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality.

Introduction. The peri-operative analgesic management of patients having either Total Knee Replacement (TKR) or Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is an area that continues to have prominence, driven in part by the desire to reduce hospital stay, while maintaining high patient satisfaction. This is particularly relevant in the current climate of healthcare cost savings. We evaluated the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection after identifying that an appreciable number of patients in the unit suffered “breakthrough pain” on the first post-op day, when the effects of local analgesia are wearing off. Method. 43 patients, who were scheduled to have a cemented Oxford UKR, were prospectively recruited and randomised. All patients had the same initial anaesthetic regime of general anaesthesia, femoral nerve block and intra-operative intra-articular infiltration of the cocktail. All patients had a 16G multi-holed epidural catheter placed intra-articularly prior to wound closure. Patients had the same operative technique, post operative rehabilitation and rescue analgesia. An independent observer recorded post-operative pain scores using a visual analogue score (1–10) every 6 hours and any rescue analgesia that was required. On the morning after surgery, 22 patients, (Group I), received 20 mls of 0.5% bupivicaine through the catheter whilst 21 patients, (Group II), had 20 mls of normal saline by the same observer, (who was blinded to the contents of the solution being injected), after which the catheter was removed. Results. When comparing these two groups there was no statistical difference found in their pain scores on the day of operation. However, patients in Group I had a significantly better pain score initially post top up and then at 6 hours (2.4 (0–8) vs 5.7 (2–9), Mann-Whitney p<0.001). This cohort of patients required less rescue analgesia (22% vs 75%, Mann-Whitney p<0.001). In addition, Group I had statistically significant higher patient satisfaction outcome scores after the infiltration, (p<0.001), with 16 reporting very good satisfaction in comparison to 1 in Group II. There were no complications in either group. Discussion. Our study has shown that injection of local anaesthesia via an intra-articular catheter does reduce pain scores when compared to placebo. This implies that this technique may have a role in providing optimal pain relief after UKR

To evaluate the patient experience of patients referred to the ESP Orthopaedic Triage Service. To identify the demographic data of the patients. To evaluate patients' expectations and satisfaction of the service. A prospective audit of 50 new patients to the ESP service in Mountain Ash General Hospital and Prince Charles Hospital. The audit was carried out over a 3 month period between December 2008 and February 2009. Patients were asked to anonymously complete a survey following their appointment. Data was collated independently and analysed with descriptive statistics. Patients referred to ESP service. Self administered satisfaction survey. Mean age range 40-59 yrs (range 20 -70yrs). 50% >1 year duration of symptoms. 94% of patient's surveyed rated the service provided as good - excellent. 88% of patient's reported that they were happy to be assessed by the ESP. 96% of patients surveyed agreed they were able to discuss their treatment openly with only 10% preferring to see a Doctor. The ESP service in Cwm Taff Health board achieves a high level of patient satisfaction

Introduction: The hip resurfacing in younger patients is being performed more frequently in the UK. At the same time conventional Total Hip Replacement (THR) is also being performed.. We carried out a study to compare the patient satisfaction and outcome following Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) and Total Hip Replacement (THR) in patients below the age of 55 years. Methods: There were 93 BHR in 73 patients and 74 THR in 64 patients performed between February 1997 to June 2005.. Retrospective evaluation of notes and complications were identified. We carried out our study using Oxford Hip score and Modified WOMAC questionnaire by postal and telephonic survey. Results: We found that mean length of stay was 4.5 days for BHR and 6.4 days for THR patients. (P< 0.0001) The dislocation rate was 0% for BHR as oppose to 4% for THR. (P< 0.05) The mean Oxford Hip score improved from pre-operative 43 to 14 for BHR as oppose to 48 to 22 for THR patients. The mean modified WOMAC score improved from 21 to 8.4 for BHR as oppose to 25 pre-operative score to 12 for THR. We also found early and sustained improvement in these scores for BHR as compare to THR during their follow-up within 6 months to 8 years. The improvement in pain score was 100% following BHR as opposed to 84% for THR. Following BHR 70% patients were very active or active as oppose to only 30% of THR patients. Return to the work and sporting activities following BHR was at a mean of 9 weeks as oppose to 14 weeks following THR. (P < 0.05) The level of satisfaction was 98% following BHR as oppose to 84% following THR. (P=0.356)

We undertook a retrospective audit to assess quality of service provided by Nurse-Led Review Clinic at Glasgow Royal Infirmary for patients sustaining ankle fracture requiring surgical stabilisation. Nursing staff had received training from the senior author regarding clinical examination and radiograph interpretation. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical documentation and radiographs of 104 patients who attended from January 2009 to December 2009. Any clinical issues were identified and radiographs were scrutinised by two of the authors to assess accuracy of interpretation. Nurse-led management was then assessed as to its appropriateness. Finally two retrospective questionnaires were used to assess both the nurses and patients satisfaction with the clinic. Nurse-led clinic protocol: First appointment 10 days: Wound review, application of lightweight plaster. Second appointment 6 weeks: Removal of plaster, check radiographs. Final appointment 12 weeks: Clinical assessment, radiographs, discharge. Clinical assessment: ensure wound satisfactory, range of movement and weight-bearing are improving. Radiographic criteria: 6 weeks: Assess for talar shift, lucency or metal-work concerns. 12 weeks: Assess evidence of fracture union, infection, loosening or backing out. If any concerns with the patients' progress nursing staff would discuss with the consultant. First appointment: 7 wound problems. 5 managed by nurses and resolved. 2 discussed with surgeon, 1 settled, 1 required oral antibiotics. 3 radiographs discussed with surgeon. 2 conservative management. 1 re-operation. Second appointment: 7 wounds managed by nurses. 1 failure of fixation, discussed for re-operation. 2 concerns regarding metal in joint – treated conservatively. Final appointment: 7 referred to physiotherapy as slow to fully weight-bear. 5 discussed for removal of syndesmosis screw. 1 screw in joint, admitted for re-operation. Clinical care provided at Nurse-Led clinic is appropriate and effective. Both nursing staff and patients were satisfied with the care provided. Nurse-led clinic reduces demands on fracture clinic appointments and is a safe, cost effective initiative

Background:. With the increase in the average age of the population, the incidence of symptomatic rotator cuff tears will also increase. Combined with more access to information via the internet etc., the patient population is more informed of the treatment modalities available and is expecting good reproducible results of their surgeries. Study:. 288 of 426 consecutive open rotator cuff repairs (2010–2012) were examined at 6 month follow up and evaluated for ranges of motion, the integrity of the deltoid and specifically the sonographic integrity of the cuff. All procedures were done in the same manner by the same surgeon (TdB). At the 6 months follow-up all had a sonar of the repaired cuff. As a second part of the study 319 of 462 consecutive cuff repair patients were phoned and evaluated by means of the ASES score insofar satisfaction with their shoulder as well as functional outcome are concerned. Results:. Pain. None – 53%. Little – 24%. Occasional – 21%. Often – 2%. Cuff integrity – perfect 72%. –. small effusion/thin but healed – 23%. –. defective – 5%. ASES score -Average 93 at average follow up 40.43 months. Conclusion:. The results show a high patient satisfaction rate, good functional outcome and especially good cuff integrity following this manner of cuff repair

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor. As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the TEA. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal.

Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise.

The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration.

Given these ideals, to what extent are patients improved? The concept of reproducing bony anatomy is based on the pretext that form will dictate function, such that normal-leaning anatomy will tend towards normal-leaning kinematics. Therefore, we seek to evaluate knee function based on objective assessments of movement or kinematics.

In summary, the use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of post-operative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality.

Introduction: As knee arthroplasty is becoming more commonplace in the working population its outcome and probability of return to work is of interest. Despite a wealth of anecdotal evidence about patient return to work post knee arthroplasty there is nothing published in the recent literature. The NHS Direct patient information website quotes patients return to work about 6 to 8 weeks post knee arthroplasty. In order to address this lack of informed information we conducted a retrospective survey.

Methods: 148 consecutive patients of working age, who underwent knee arthroplasty in 2007 were identified by our Electronic Patients Record. (52 male, 96 female, average age 58 years (range 37–65 years)) They were asked to complete a simple questionnaire relating to their occupational history, arthroplasty satisfaction and their current working capacity.

Results: Our survey had a response rate of 67% (99/148 responders, 64 female and 35 male), with a range of follow up from 7 to 19 months. 39% of patients were in employment at the time of their arthroplasty, with 46 % (46/99) returning to some working capacity post surgery. 32% (32/99) patients were able to return to their exact same employment. 88% (28/32) of these patients had worked up to the date of their arthroplasty. There was no correlation between operative indication or type of prosthesis implanted and patients who returned to employment and those who did not.

Conclusion: Despite high expectation in lay literature of ability to work post knee arthroplasty, only 46% of our patients returned to any form of employment. For patients who returned to work, the duration of sick leave prior to their surgery was a strong predictor of whether they returned to any form of employment. Caution must be exercised when informing patients of likelihood of return to work post knee arthroplasty.

Objective: To evaluate the functional results and patient subjective satisfaction of hemiarthroplasty for complex fractures of the proximal humerus. Methods: Forty-one consecutive three and four-part proximal humerus fractures in 40 patients (mean age: 71.3, 28 to 85 years) treated with hemiarthroplasty were retrospectively evaluated at a mean follow-up of 30,5 (12–82) months. Patients were clinically assessed following the Constant scale, and the ability to perform activities of daily living was scored according to the ASES score. The results were compared to the contra-lateral healthy shoulder. The patients activity level was documented pre- and postoperatively following a semi-quantitative scale ranging 1 to 5, and patients gave their subjective opinion on the result. Results: The mean Constant scores and the mean scores in the ability to perform daily activities were 51.1±18 and 13.7±7 in the injured shoulder and 79.6±9 and 22.6±4 in the opposite, respectively. Pain relief was the most predictable outcome. The activity level decreased from to 3.5 to 3.1. One patient (2.4%) rated subjectively the result as excellent, 12 (29.3%) as good, 19 as fair (46.3%), and 9 patients (22%) as poor. Two patients required revision, one due to periprosthetic fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, and one due to acute greater tuberosity detachement, who was managed with open reattachment. Discussion: Hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures yields suboptimal objective and subjective results and should be reserved for head-splitting fractures, four-part fractures in patients with low physical demands, and for those cases where an acceptable reduction cannot be obtained