176. PATIENT SATISFACTION FOLLOWING CLAVICLE FRACTURE FIXATION: HORIZONTAL VERSUS VERTICAL INCISION

Abstract

Purpose: To document outcomes and patient satisfaction in relation to the incision used following clavicle fracture fixation. In literature, the incidence of incisional numbness following operative fixation of clavicle fractures is reported to be between 7–29%. Such wound related problems contribute significantly to the dissatisfaction of patients with operatively treated clavicle fractures. Wound related problems can be bothersome and disabling and this is poorly documented.

Method: All primary clavicle fractures treated with plating at the Alfred Hospital between 01/06/2003 and 01/06/2006 were included in the study. Patients were asked to complete paper-based questionnaires assessing satisfaction, pain, scar satisfaction, presence of numbness and the degree of disability following clavicle fixation. Their clinical notes and X-rays were reviewed for evaluation. The study sample was then divided into two groups; horizontal incision versus vertical incision then the data was analysed.

Results: The response rate was 65% (35/54). 74% of patients reported as having “good” or better outcome following their clavicle fracture fixation. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores. However, there were statistically significant differences observed in the presence of numbness (vertical 21% versus horizontal 62%) and the disability from the numbness between the two incision types. Overall satisfaction between the two groups was also significantly different.

Conclusion: This study confirms that scar-related problems significantly affect the satisfaction following plating of clavicle fractures and numbness appears to be one of the most significant factors. Vertical incisions appear to reduce the incidence of numbness and lead to better patient satisfaction. Our results suggest that vertical incision is an attractive alternative approach in clavicle fracture fixation.