Abstract

Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) is an available option for the management of massive bone loss around failed knee implants. The aim of this study was to determine the results of knee EPRs performed for non-tumour indications. Since 2007, 85 EPRs were performed for in a single tertiary centre by seven surgeons. Mean age at surgery was 73.5 years (range:35–95) with infection as the most common indication (49%), followed by aseptic loosening (18%), complex primary replacement (16%), fracture (15%) and mechanical failure (2%). Mean follow up was 4 years (range:1–9). Functional outcome was determined using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). At follow-up, 21 patients were deceased and 2 lost to follow-up. Complication rate was 19%. Of the 7 infected cases, 6 were treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention) and one underwent above knee amputation. Four of the patients undergoing DAIR were cleared of infection and 2 are on long-term antibiotics. Accounting for implant revision, loss to follow-up and those on long-term antibiotics as failures, 5-year survival was 89% with an average OKS of 25 (SD=10). This mid-term study shows that distal femur EPR is a valuable option for the increasing burden of complex revision knee surgery

The evidence to help the surgeon decide on the merits of which type of replacement to offer their patients is steadily mounting and comes from large datasets such as joint registries.

There are many advantages of UKR vs TKR such as satisfaction, function, recovery, morbidity, mortality and cost but there is one major disadvantage. All registries show a higher failure rate with UKRs.

Registries show that there are more excellent and fewer poor Patient Reported Outcome Measure Scores (PROMS) with UKR compared to TKR and the higher revision rate is in major part due to the threshold of revision. For instance, 60% of UKR are revised vs 10% of TKR with an Oxford score that is worse post-operation than pre-operation. Ease of revision with UKR is a major determinant of the higher revision rate.

The real issue with UKR relates to usage. Most surgeons perform very few UKR on young patients with early arthritis viewing the procedure as a pre-TKR. Low surgeon volume equates to high revision rate in the national registries. Surgeons should either abandon UKR or do an adequate number to ensure success.

Surgeons can improve their results by increasing their usage of UKR. The Unicompartmental Knee National Joint Registry (UKNJR) data shows that the optimal usage of the mobile UKR is between 20 and 50% of replacements. Fixed bearing usage is optimal at 20% but not higher.

The other major advantage concerns the lower mortality rate with UKR. At 90 days it is less than half that of TKR and even at 8 years it is 10% less. For every 10 UKRs performed rather than TKR then one life is saved at 8 years.

There is very little evidence suggesting that bi-UKR is necessary certainly with the mobile UKR. There is evidence, however that patellofemoral joint problems are a problem with fixed bearing UKR in the second decade.

Achieving a primary outcome with revision UKR is possible but it depends on an understanding of the main failure modes and avoiding the obvious pitfalls. The most common failure mode in the long term is lateral compartment progression at 2.5% at 28 years. The most common failure overall is misdiagnosis of a painful radiolucency leading to unnecessary revision.

There are a number of potential pitfalls:

Do not revise for unexplained pain. 75% of patients will go on to fail because of continuing pain. A distinction must be made to differentiate between a physiological radiolucency (with a narrow lucency accompanied by a sclerotic margin which is normal) and a pathological radiolucency (with a poorly defined lucency without surrounding sclerotic margin which is indicative of loosening and/or infection)

Femoral loosening can present with subtle findings. Flexion/extension views are helpful to diagnose this problem.

Wear can be a problem with fixed bearing in the second decade and can present with subtle findings. Infection can present with contralateral compartment joint space narrowing.

The approach and exposure is usually straightforward and component removal is generally easy. Tibial resection is undertaken referenced from the normal lateral condyle removing 10mm of bone. Femoral preparation is generally straightforward but care must be taken to dial in correct rotation in the absence of the posterior medial condyle which was resected in the first operation. Generally a CR or PS primary implant is used with 2–4mm extra polyethylene thickness than is used in primary case.

Revision for infection and stress fracture led to difficult revisions where revision components are usually required.

The results for Revision UKR approach those of a primary procedure in all cases except revision for unexplained pain, infection and a stress fracture.

Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is associated with fewer complications, faster recovery and better function than Total Knee Replacement (TKR). However, joint registries demonstrate a higher revision rate in UKR, limiting its use. Currently most UKRs are cemented and performed using a minimally invasive technique. In joint registries, common reasons for revision include aseptic loosening and pain. These problems could potentially be addressed by using cementless implants, which may provide more reliable fixation.

The objectives of this study were to compare the quality of fixation (determined by the incidence and appearance of radiolucencies), and clinical outcomes of cemented and cementless UKR at five years.

A randomised controlled trial was established with 63 knees (62 patients) randomised to either cemented (32 patients) or cementless UKR (30 patients). Fixation was assessed with fluoroscopic radiographs aligned to the bone-implant interface at one and five years. Outcome scores were collected pre-operatively and at one, two and five years, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score, objective and functional (AKSS-O/F) and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), expressed as absolute scores and 0–5 year change (δ) scores.

Four patients died during the study period. There were no revisions. Mean operative time was 11 minutes shorter in the cementless group (p=0.029). At five years, there was no significant difference in any outcome measure except AKSS-F and δAKSS-F which were significantly better in the cementless group (both p=0.003). There were no femoral radiolucencies in either group. There were significantly more tibial radiolucencies in the cemented group (20/30 vs 2/27, p< 0.001). There were nine complete radiolucencies in the cemented group and none in the cementless group (p< 0.001).

Cementless fixation provides improved fixation at five years compared to cemented fixation in UKR, maintaining equivalent or superior clinical outcomes with a shorter operative time and no increase in complications.

Indications for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) vary between units. Some authors have suggested, and many surgeons believe, that medial UKA should only be performed in patients who localise their pain to the medial joint line. This is despite research showing a poor correlation between patient-reported location of pain and radiological or operative findings in osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of patient-reported pre-operative pain location and functional outcome of UKA at one and five years.

Pre-operative pain location data were collected for 406 knees (380 patients) undergoing Oxford medial UKA. Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Scores and Tegner activity scale were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up. 272/406 (67%) had pure medial pain, 25/406 (6%) had pure anterior knee pain and 109/406 (27%) had mixed or generalised pain. None had pure lateral pain. The primary outcome interval is one year; 132/406 patients had attained five years by the time of analysis and their five year data is presented.

At one and five years, each group had improved significantly by each measure (mean δOKS 15.6 (SD 8.9) at year one, 16.3 (9.3) at year five). There was no difference between the groups, nor between patients with and without anterior knee pain or isolated medial pain.

We have found no correlation between preoperative pain location and outcome. We conclude that localised medial pain should not be a prerequisite to UKA and that it may be performed in patients with generalised or anterior knee pain.

Introduction

The peri-operative analgesic management of patients having either Total Knee Replacement (TKR) or Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is an area that continues to have prominence, driven in part by the desire to reduce hospital stay, while maintaining high patient satisfaction. This is particularly relevant in the current climate of healthcare cost savings. We evaluated the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection after identifying that an appreciable number of patients in the unit suffered “breakthrough pain” on the first post-op day, when the effects of local analgesia are wearing off.

Introduction

The options for the treatment of the young active patient with unicompartmental symptomatic osteoarthritis and pre-existing Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficiency are limited. Patients with ACL deficiency and end-stage medial compartment osteoarthritis are usually young and active. The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKA) is a well established treatment option in the management of symptomatic end-stage medial compartmental osteoarthritis, but a functionally intact ACL is a pre-requisite for its satisfactory outcome. If absent, high failure rates have been reported, primarily due to tibial loosening. Previously, we have reported results on a consecutive series of 15 such patients in whom the ACL was reconstructed and patients underwent a staged or simultaneous UKA. The aim of the current study is to provide an update on the clinical and radiological outcomes of a large, consecutive cohort of patients with ACL reconstruction and UKA for the treatment of end-stage medial compartment osteoarthritis and to evaluate, particularly, the outcome of those patients under 50.

Introduction

Radiolucencies beneath the tibial component are well recognized in knee arthroplasty; the aetiology and significance are poorly understood. Non-progressive narrow radiolucencies with a sclerotic margin are thought not to be indicative of loosening. Factors which decrease the incidence of radiolucencies include cementless fixation and the use of pulse lavage. Leg/component alignment or BMI do not influence radiolucency. We are not aware of any studies that have looked at the effect of load type on radiolucency.

The Oxford domed lateral tibial component was introduced to decrease the bearing dislocation rate that was unacceptably high with the flat tibial tray. However, the introduction of the domed tibial component alters the forces transmitted through the implant-cement-bone interface. As the Oxford UKR uses a fully congruent mobile bearing, the forces transmitted through the interface with a flat tray are compressive, except for the effect of friction. However, with the domed tibial component shear forces are introduced. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of radiolucency beneath the previous flat design and the new domed tibial tray.

INTRODUCTION

Establishing a full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment and functionally intact ACL is vital before proceeding with unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The aim of this study is to assess whether MRI is a useful adjunct in predicting suitability for UKR, as compared to standard and stress radiographs.

Introduction

Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee (anteromedial gonarthrosis-AMG) is a common form of knee arthritis. In a clinical setting, knee arthritis has always been assessed by plain radiography in conjunction with pain and function assessments. Whilst this is useful for surgical decision making in bone on bone arthritis, plain radiography gives no insight to the earlier stages of disease. In a recent study 82% of patients with painful arthritis had only partial thickness joint space loss on plain radiography. These patients are managed with various surgical treatments; injection, arthroscopy, osteotomy and arthroplasty with varying results. We believe these varying results are in part due to these patients being at different stages of disease, which will respond differently to different treatments. However radiography cannot delineate these stages. We describe the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings of this partial thickness AMG as a way of understanding these earlier stages of the disease.

Introduction

Anteromedial gonarthrosis is a common well described pattern of knee osteoarthritis with cartilage wear beginning in the anteromedial quadrant of the medial tibial plateau in the presence of an intact and functioning ACL. It is well known that mechanical factors such as limb alignment and meniscal integrity affect the progression of arthritis and there is some evidence that the morphology of the tibial plateau may be a risk factor in the development of this disease. The extension facet angle is the angle of the downslope of the anterior portion of the medial tibial plateau joint surface in relation to the middle portion on a sagittal view. If this is an important factor in the development of AMG there may be potential for disease modifying intervention.

This study investigates if there is a significant difference in this angle as measured on MRI between a study cohort with early AMG (partial thickness cartilage damage and intact ACL) and a comparator control cohort of patients (no cartilage damage and ACL rupture).

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) accounts for 84% of all knee replacement surgery in the UK (NJR 2009) despite published epidemiological data showing that single compartment disease is most prevalent. We investigated this incompatibility further by describing the compartmental pattern and stage of cartilage loss of all patients with osteoarthritis (OA) presenting to a specialist knee clinic over one year.

Introduction

The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and thus ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component.

Introduction

Obesity has been considered a relative contra-indication in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to fear of high wear rates, loosening and tibial collapse. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of high body mass index (BMI) on ten-year survivorship and five-year functional outcome after Oxford UKA, a fully congruous mobile bearing design with large contact area and low wear rate.

Purpose of study

To investigate the linear penetration rate of the polyethylene bearing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at twenty years.

Introduction

Kozinn and Scott have made recommendations about contra-indications for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). They suggest that patients younger than 60, weight > 82 kilograms, patients with exposed bone in patella-femoral compartment or patients who are physically active/perform heavy labour should not be offered a UKR. In addition, chondrocalcinosis is a contra-indication. These strict selection criteria are based on the experience with fixed bearing UKAs and are more intuitive than evidence based. The Oxford UKR has a fully congruous mobile bearing and has been shown to have minimal wear. Over the past 25 years, the Oxford Group has followed a standardised protocol for patient selection for UKR. We ignore patella-femoral joint pathology, chondrocalcinosis, patient's age, weight and activity level when deciding the suitability for UKR.

Purpose of Study

To assess the incidence of radiolucency in cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement at two years.

Introduction: The results of the mobile bearing Oxford partial knee replacement (PKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Bearing dislocation is a particular concern, and to address this issue a new domed implant was introduced with a modified surgical technique. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of dislocation between a domed and flat lateral PKR.

Methods: Separate kinematic models were generated for the domed and flat bearings. The femoral component, tibial tray and bearing were aligned in a neutral position; the flat bearing was positioned centrally on the tibial tray and 2 mm from the side wall; the domed bearing was placed concentrically on the domed tibial tray. Dislocation in the Posterior (A-P), Lateral (M-L) and Medial against the tray wall (L-M-wall) were investigated. For each dislocation the tibial tray was restrained in all degrees of freedom (DOF) and the femoral component was restrained in five DOF; A-P and M-L displacements; A-P, M-L and Superior-Inferior (S-I) rotations. The bearing was restrained from rotating about the S-I axis for each dislocation. For the L-M-wall dislocation the underside of the bearing was held in contact with the tibial tray wall such that the lowest S-I displacement of the femoral component was achieved. The least amount of distraction required for bearing dislocation to occur was calculated for the seven bearing sizes available. The effect of medial-lateral positioning of the femur on dislocation was investigated.

Results: The minimum femur distraction to cause A-P flat and domed bearing dislocation ranged from 4.68mm to 3.91mm and 6.29mm to 5.59mm respectively as the bearing thickness increased from 3.5mm to 9.5mm. The minimum femur distraction to cause L-M-wall flat and domed bearing dislocation ranged from 3.42mm to 4.16mm and 4.55mm to 5.44mm respectively as the bearing thickness increased from 3.5 mm to 9.5 mm. The femur distraction required for L-M-wall bearing dislocation increased from 4.55mm to 6.3mm with a 2 mm medial movement of the femoral component. A 4 mm lateral movement of the femoral component decreased the distraction from 4.55mm to 2.35mm.

Discussion: A domed bearing can lead to an increased femoral distraction of between 25% and 37%, significantly reducing the likelihood of dislocation. This may be significant during everyday activities and demonstrates that the new domed design should reduce the incidence of bearing dislocation by increasing the amount of entrapment; our current series of 200 patients has no dislocations. Increasing the thickness of the bearing has a small effect on the distraction required to allow bearing dislocation. The medial-lateral placement of the femoral component has a pronounced effect on the femoral distraction required for bearing dislocation over the tray wall; medial placement of the femoral component is advisable.

Introduction: Approximately 20% of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) revisions are related to polyethylene wear. The Phase 1 Oxford UKR was introduced as a design against wear, with a fully congruent mobile bearing. The Phase 2 implant was introduced with new instrumentation (femoral mill) and changes to the bearing shape (lower anterior wall) to reduce the incidence of anterior impingement. We have previously shown that the Oxford UKR has a wear rate of 0.02 mm/year at ten years, in well functioning devices, but that higher wear rates can be seen with impingement or if the congruous articulation is lost. The aim of this study was to determine the 20 year in-vivo wear of the Oxford Phase 1 and Phase 2 UKR, using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA).

Method: We measured the in-vivo wear of 6 Phase 1 (5 patients, mean age 65.24 years) and 7 Phase 2 (4 patients, mean age 63.43) Oxford UKR bearings. Average time since surgery was 22.37 years and 19.46 years for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 implants respectively. Selection criteria included patients who were mobile, with an exercise tolerance greater than 100m as per the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) functional questionnaire. RSA x-rays were taken with the knee in the normal anatomical position on standing and with the knee flexed to 30o. The Oxford knee score (OKS) and AKSS were gained at the RSA examination. Phase 1 and 2 components were reverse engineered by laser scanning, and converted to CAD models. The CAD models of the tibia and femur were pose-estimated in the RSA software (Medis Specials, Leiden, Netherlands). A sphere was fit to the femoral component and the minimum bearing thickness was determined by measuring the shortest perpendicular distance between the sphere and the plane contained on the tibial tray articular surface. The linear wear for each bearing was calculated by subtracting the measured thickness from the corrected nominal bearing thickness. Non-parametric statistics were used to compare the two Phases.

Results: There was no significant difference in age, OKS and AKSS between the two groups. The median wear rate was 0.078 mm/year for Phase 1 and 0.023 mm/year for Phase 2. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.027).

Discussion: The difference in wear rate is explained by impingement in Phase 1, which was reduced by design changes with the introduction of Phase 2; the Phase 2 is designed to avoid impingement between the femur and the bearing. This study demonstrates that very low wear rates can be maintained with the Phase 2 implant to the end of the second decade after implantation. This is of particular importance when the device is used in younger patients and demonstrates that the Oxford UKR can be a definitive implant for the treatment of isolated compartmental osteoarthritis.