Abstract
Introduction
The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and thus ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component.
Aim
The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series [series I], Series II with improved surgical technique and the domed tibial component [Series III].
Method
The primary assessment of outcome was bearing dislocation at one year. One year was chosen as all the dislocations in the first series occurred within a year. In series I, there were 53 knees, in series II 65 knees and in series III 100 knees, all with a minimum of one year follow up.
Results
In series I, there were 6 bearing dislocations (11%) and the average range of movement (ROM) was 110°. In the second series, there were 2 dislocations (3%) and the average ROM was 118°. In the third series, there were no primary dislocations and the average ROM was 125°, the difference between range of movement as well as dislocation rate being significant.
Conclusions
The improved surgical technique and implant design have reduced the dislocation rate to an acceptable level and therefore a mobile bearing can now be recommended for lateral UKR.
