Introduction. There is a demand for longer lasting arthroplasty implants driving the investigation of novel material combinations. PEEK has shown promise as an arthroplasty bearing material, with potentially relatively bio inert wear debris [1]. When coupled with an all-polyethylene tibial component this combination shows potential as a metal-free knee. In this study, the suitability of PEEK Optima® as an alternative to cobalt chrome for the femoral component of total knee replacements was assessed using experimental knee wear simulation under two kinematic conditions. Methods. Three cobalt chrome and three injection moulded PEEK Optima® (Invibio Biomaterial Solutions, UK) femoral components of similar geometry and surface roughness (mean surface roughness (Ra) ∼0.02µm) were coupled with all-polyethylene GUR1020 (conventional, unsterilised) tibial components in a 6 station ProSim knee simulator (Simulation Solutions, UK). 3 million cycles (MC) of wear simulation were carried out under intermediate kinematics (maximum anterior-posterior (AP) displacement 5mm) followed by 3MC under high kinematics (AP 10mm) [2] with 25% serum as the lubricant. The wear of the tibial component was assessed gravimetrically. At each measurement point, the surface roughness of the femoral components was determined using contacting profilometry and throughout testing, the bulk lubricant temperature was monitored close to the articulating surfaces. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA, with significance at p<0.05. Results. Figure 1 shows the wear rate of the all-polyethylene tibial components. After 3MC of intermediate kinematics, the mean wear rate of UHMWPE articulating against cobalt chrome was 1.0±2.3mm3/MC and against PEEK was similar (p=0.06) 2.5±0.8mm3/MC. Scratches were apparent on the surface of the PEEK implant in the AP direction significantly (p<0.05) increasing mean surface roughness of the PEEK components (Table 1) compared to pre-test values. The surface topography of the cobalt chrome components (Table 2) was similar to pre-test measurements. Increasing AP displacement caused no significant increase in the wear of the tibial inserts against either material. Under intermediate kinematics, the mean bulk lubricant temperature was 28.0±0.7°C for cobalt chrome and significantly higher (p<0.001) for PEEK, 29.5±0.1°C; kinematic conditions had no effect on the lubricant temperature. Conclusions. This study showed a similar wear rate of all-polyethylene tibial components against PEEK and cobalt chrome femoral components of similar initial surface topography and geometry. Wear simulation with a higher AP displacement did not increase the wear of the polyethylene, in contrast to other designs of knee replacements, potentially due to the low conforming geometry of the implant [3]. The linear scratching on the surface of the PEEK implants did not increase the wear rate of the tibial components and the surface did not deteriorate further between 3 and 6 MC. A higher mean lubricant temperature was measured with PEEK femoral components, which was attributed to the higher friction of the PEEK-PE bearing couple. However it is not known whether this is clinically relevant or an artefact of the continuous running of the simulator. PEEK Optima® shows promise as the femoral component in a metal-free knee

INTRODUCTION. Many studies have looked at the effects of titanium tibial baseplates compared to cobalt chrome baseplates on backside wear. However, the surface finish of the materials is usually different (polished/unpolished) [1,2]. Backside wear may be a function not only of tray material but also of the locking mechanism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear performance of conventional polyethylene inserts when mated with titanium tibial trays or cobalt chrome tibial trays that both have non-polished topside surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three titanium (Ti) trays were used along with three cobalt chrome (CoCr) trays. The Ti trays underwent Type II anodization prior to testing. All trays were Triathlon® design (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ). Tibial inserts were manufactured from GUR 1020 conventional polyethylene then vacuum/flush packaged and sterilized in nitrogen (30 kGy). Appropriate sized CoCr femoral components articulated against the tibial inserts (Triathlon®, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ). Surface roughness of the tibial trays was taken prior to testing using white light interferometry (Zygo Corp, Middlefield, CT). A 6-station knee simulator (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN) was used for testing. Two phases were conducted. The first phase used a normal walking profile, as dictated by ISO 14243-3 [3]. The second phase used waveforms created specifically for stair climbing kinematics. Testing was conducted at a frequency of 1 Hz for 2 million cycles for each test with a lubricant of Alpha Calf Fraction serum (Hyclone Labs, Logan, UT) diluted to 50% with a pH-balanced 20-mMole solution of deionized water and EDTA (protein level = 20 g/l) [4]. The serum solution was replaced and inserts were weighed for gravimetric wear at least every 0.5 million cycles. Standard test protocols were used for cleaning, weighing and assessing the wear loss of the tibial inserts [5]. Soak control specimens were used to correct for fluid absorption with weight loss data converted to volumetric data (by material density). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test (p<0.05). RESULTS. White light interferometry measurements (Figure 1) showed a significant difference in surface roughness between the Ti and CoCr tibial trays (p < 0.01). Figure 2 displays the results of wear testing after 2 million cycles for walking and stair climbing kinematics and showed no significant difference in wear rate between the two tibial trays for either test. The large standard deviation for the CoCr trays during stair climbing kinematics is due to one outlier that had 60% higher wear than the remaining two stations. Without this station, the average of the remaining two CoCr stations was 7.6 mm. 3. /mc, which was similar to the average obtained using Ti tibial trays. Figure 3 shows the backside surfaces of the polyethylene inserts after 2 million cycles using the stair climbing kinematics. Visually, the inserts mated with the Ti trays showed less of a stenciling effect that those mated with CoCr trays. The location of the stenciled area corresponded to the location of the femoral condyle during the loading cycle. DISCUSSION. Although Ti has different material properties than CoCr, the results of this study show that the wear performance was not adversely affected when Ti tibial trays were substituted for standard CoCr tibial trays under normal walking and stair climbing kinematics. Even though there are differences between the two materials, the documented wear was not significantly different possibly owing to the specific locking mechanism tested

PURPOSE:. Wright Medical has a long history of modular neck hip implants but had fracture issues with the original titanium necks. They subsequently changed to chrome cobalt modular necks. Direct contact between these dissimilar metal parts in the modular femoral component brings into consideration the possibility of similar adverse reactions of metal-on-metal articulations that have been previously described in other designs. METHODS:. A retrospective review of 10 patients with Wright Medical chrome cobalt modular necks who were evaluated with chromium and cobalt metal ion levels as well as Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence (MARS) MRI's was performed. Pseudotumors were classified by MRI based on wall thickness, T1/T2 signal, shape, and location and given a corresponding type of I, II, or III. For each patient, symptoms or lack thereof were recorded, and time since surgery noted. RESULTS:. Of 10 patients tested, 9 were symptomatic, and 1 was asymptomatic. The patient that was asymptomatic at last clinical visit at 14 months post-op while symptomatic patients averaged 18 months since initial surgery before symptoms began. Those with metal-poly articulation had an average cobalt level of 1.6, ceramic-ceramic articulation had level of <1, and metal-on-metal had level of 2.9. Five patients had pseudotumor by MRI (2 type I, 1 type II, and 2 type III pseudotumors). CONCLUSION:. It appears that an unintended consequence of changing from titanium to chrome cobalt modular neck may be occurring secondary to corrosion at neck-stem junction. SIGNIFICANCE: This reaction does not appear to be design-specific as these findings are similar to our findings in Stryker Rejuvenate stems. Surgeons evaluating patients with these and other similar stems should be aware of this complication and consider ion testing and MARS MRI

The PFC Sigma Cobalt Chrome Sigma (PFCSCC) was introduced in 2006, an update of the PFC Sigma designed to reduce backside wear. To help identify any significant early failures following its introduction, we prospectively identified all recipients over a one-year period. The patient's clinical, demographic and radiographic data, American Knee Society scores (AKSS), Oxford Knee scores (OKS) and SF-12 scores was recorded pre-operatively and at one, three and five years. 233 patients underwent 249 primary knee arthroplasties with the PFCSCC. Seventeen patients (19 knees) died and 29 patients (30 knees) were also lost to follow up at the five year point. The mean age was 66.6 (34–80) with 47.6% of the cohort being male. The mean five year follow-up was 1836 days (1530–2307). Five knees (2.2%) were revised for infection and three were revised for pain. The 5–year cumulative survival rate was 96.6% for any failure and 98.6% for aseptic failure. AKSS 32.6 (0–86.6) preoperatively, 80.7 (29–95) 5 years P < 0.001. OKS was 39.0 (22–53) preoperatively, 23.5 (4.7–42.3) 5 years P < 0.001. These results demonstrate a good early survivorship when compared to the old design PFC Sigma, however further follow-up to ten years is required

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of cemented TKR using either oxidized zirconium (oxinium) or cobalt chrome (CoCr) femoral components in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKR. Patients involved in the study received one of each prosthesis, thereby acting as their own control. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the clinical and radiographic outcome between the two prosthetic materials. Forty consecutive patients who were undergoing bilateral Genesis ll TKR consented to participate in the study. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at five days, six weeks and one, two and five years, postoperatively. The outcome measures included the KOOS, Knee Society Score, BOA Patient Satisfaction Scale, and radiographs at six weeks and one, two and five years. In two patients polyethlylene exchange was performed at 56 months from surgery during patellofemoral resurfacing. The four retrieved polyethylene liners were studied for wear with the aid of a stereo zoom microscope and an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Both the patients and the all examiners were blinded as to the prosthesis type throughout the study. Forty patients (80 knees) were included in the study. At five years, three patients were deceased and two had developed senile dementia. No patients were lost to follow up. At five years from surgery the CoCr knee was preferred by 41% of patients compared to 13% who preferred the Oxinium knee (p=0.009). There was no significant difference in range of motion between the two prosthesis at five days, six weeks or one, two and five years. There were also no significant differences between the two prostheses in any of the other variables assessed. The four retrieved polyethylene inserts showed similar patterns of wear in terms of both wear types and patterns under examination with both the stereo zoom and scanning electron microscope with no clear differences between CoCr and Oxinium bearing against the polyethlylene. There was no difference in the grade or incidence of radiographic lucencies between the two prosthesis at five years. At five years after surgery the only significant difference between the Genesis II Oxinium prosthesis and the CoCr prosthesis was a subjective preference for the CoCr prosthesis by a higher proportion of patients. There were no unexpected complications associated with the use the Oxinium femoral implants. In the four retrieved polyethylene liners, no significant differences were identified between the two prosthesis materials in terms of detectable wear type and patterns. Continued follow up of this cohort is planned to establish whether Oxinium femoral implants have an improved survivorship compared to CoCr femoral component in total knee replacement to warrant the additional cost

Purpose. Total disc replacement (TDR) devices have been restricted to designs with large, congruent articulations due to the limited wear properties of available materials. TDRs with more natural motion could be designed if materials were available which could resist the higher wear conditions. A novel TriLobe TDR design is self-centering and energetically stable, emulating the natural motion of the intact motion segment, but is not feasible using traditional materials due to small incongruent articulating surfaces. The objective of this study was to compare the wear properties of a medical grade polycrystalline diamond with wear properties of cobalt chrome (CoCr) and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in aggressive high wear conditions. Methods. A modified pin-on-disc, crossing-path wear test was used to measure the wear rates of PCD-on-PCD, CoCr-on-CoCr, and CoCr-on-UHMWPE. The discs were placed in the inferior position on an oscillating plate, moving in a 10mm by 5mm figure-eight pattern. Pins had an initial 11.5mm radius and were loaded at 133N normal to the disc. In a typical pin-on-disc test, a wear flat develops on the pin and the wear rate is reduced as the contact area increases. The TriLobe design uses three lobes sliding in three non-conforming lenses which prevents wear flats from developing. To approximate this condition, the fixture holding the disc was placed on an air bearing and was allowed to rock in concert with movement of the load. The test was conducted in 25% bovine serum at a speed of less than two Hertz. Two sets of each material were tested, one set to 2.0 million cycles and the other set to 14.0 million cycles. Wear rates on the rocking-discs were measured using a high resolution coordinate measuring machine because the wear in the PCD specimens was not detectable gravimetrically. Results. The diamond specimen averaged 0.0036mm. 3. /MC of wear over the first 2 million cycles. The CoCr-on-CoCr specimens averaged 1.4mm. 3. /MC and the CoCr-on-UHMWPE averaged 4.7mm. 3. /MC over 2 million cycles. The PCD specimen taken to 14 million cycles had and average wear of 0.0022mm. 3. /MC compared to 2.4mm. 3. /MC and 9.5mm. 3. /MC for CoCr-on-CoCr and CoCr-on-UHMWPE respectively. Conclusions. Using the pin-on-rocking-disc test to approximate small, non-congruent articulating surface wear, both CoCr-on-CoCr and CoCr-on-UHMWPE wore at rates that were orders of magnitude greater than medical grade PCD. At two million cycles, CoCr-on-CoCr had worn nearly 400 times more than PCD and CoCr-on-UHMWPE wore more than 1300 times greater. During the last 12 million cycles the wear in non-diamond specimen accelerated, while the diamond wear rate decreased. At the end of 14 million cycles CoCr on itself and on UHMWPE specimens had worn at more than 1100 times and nearly 4300 times greater than PCD, respectively. Coupled with the inherent biocompatibility, high strength and toughness, and ultra low friction of diamond, the performance of PCD makes it an attractive material for TDR applications. PCD could be used in current designs to alleviate concern over wear debris and ion release and to increase the space for the next generation of TDR devices

Introduction

Revision of total hip replacements (THRS) is predominantly due to aseptic loosening, pain and infection [1]. The current method used to address the risk of infection is to administer antibiotics and to include antibacterial agents into bone cement (if used) and on implant coatings [2–4]. Currently, silver (Ag) coatings have only been applied to titanium hip stems [3]. Cobalt chromium alloy (CoCr) is a widely used orthopaedic alloy which is commonly used as a bearing surface; revisions of joints using this material often describe adverse reactions to the particulate wear debris [1]. This study considers an Ag containing CrN based coating on a CoCr substrate with the aim to reduce cobalt (Co) release and promote antibacterial silver release.

Background. The advent of highly cross-linked polyethylene has resulted in improved wear rates and reduced osteolysis with at least intermediate follow-up when compared to conventional polyethylene. However, the role of alternative femoral head bearing materials in decreasing wear is less clear. The purpose of this study was to determine in-vivo polyethylene wear rates across ceramic, Oxinium, and cobalt chrome femoral head articulations. Methods. A review of our institutional database was performed to identify patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty using either ceramic or oxidized zirconium (Oxinium) femoral head components on highly cross-linked polyethylene between 2008 and 2011. These patients were then matched on implant type, age, sex and BMI with patients who had a cobalt chrome bearing implant during the same time period. RSA analysis was performed using the center index method to measure femoral head penetration (polyethylene wear). Secondary quality of life outcomes were collected using WOMAC and HHS Scores. Paired analyses were performed to detect differences in wear rate (mm/year) between the cobalt chrome cohorts and their matched ceramic and Oxinium cohorts. Additional independent group comparisons were performed by analysis of variance with the control groups collapsed to determine wear rate differences between all three cohorts. Results. A total of 75 patients underwent RSA analysis. 20 patients with a ceramic femoral head component and 16 patients with an Oxinium femoral head component along with the same number of matched patients with cobalt chrome femoral head component were included in the analysis. The time in vivo for the Oxinium (5.17 +/− 0.96 years), Oxinium matched cohort (5.13 +/− 0.72 years), ceramic (5.15 +/− 0.76 years) and ceramic matched cohort (5.36 +/− 0.63 years) were comparable. The demographics of all bearing surface cohorts were similar. The paired comparison between the Oxinium and cobalt chrome cohorts (0.32 vs. 0.28 mm/year, p=0.427) and ceramic vs cobalt chrome cohorts (0.28 vs. 0.22 mm/year, p=0.202) did not demonstrate a significant difference in wear rate. The independent groups analysis revealed a significantly higher wear rate of Oxinium (0.33 mm/year) compared to cobalt chrome (0.24 mm/year) (p = 0. 038). There were no differences in HHS and WOMAC scores between the Oxinium and cobalt chrome cohorts (HHS: p = 0.71, WOMAC: p=0.08) or the ceramic and cobalt chrome cohorts (HHS: p=0.15, WOMAC: p =023). Conclusion. This study presents evidence of a greater wear rate (mm/year) of the Oxinium femoral head component compared to a cobalt chrome femoral head component. This difference was not demonstrated in the ceramic femoral head component. Despite this difference, there were no clinical differences as measured by the HHS and WOMAC. Future research should focus on factors that may contribute to the higher wear rate seen in the Oxinium cohort. Level of Evidence – Level II. Disclosures - Institutional support provided by Depuy, Stryker, and Smith and Nephew

The advent of highly cross-linked polyethylene has resulted in improved wear rates and reduced osteolysis with at least intermediate follow-up when compared to conventional polyethylene. However, the role of alternative femoral head bearing materials in decreasing wear is less clear. The purpose of this study was to determine in-vivo polyethylene wear rates across ceramic, Oxinium, and cobalt chrome femoral head articulations. A review of our institutional database was performed to identify patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty using either ceramic or oxidised zirconium (Oxinium) femoral head components on highly cross-linked polyethylene between 2008 and 2011. These patients were then matched on implant type, age, sex and BMI with patients who had a cobalt chrome bearing implant during the same time period. RSA analysis was performed using the centre index method to measure femoral head penetration (polyethylene wear). Secondary quality of life outcomes were collected using WOMAC and HHS Scores. Paired analyses were performed to detect differences in wear rate (mm/year) between the cobalt chrome cohorts and their matched ceramic and Oxinium cohorts. Additional independent group comparisons were performed by analysis of variance with the control groups collapsed to determine wear rate differences between all three cohorts. A total of 68 patients underwent RSA analysis. Fifteen patients with a ceramic femoral head component and 14 patients with an Oxinium femoral head component along with the same number of matched patients with cobalt chrome femoral head component were included in the analysis. The time in vivo for the Oxinium (5.17 +/− 0.96 years), Oxinium matched cohort (5.13 +/− 0.72 years), ceramic (5.15 +/− 0.76 years) and ceramic matched cohort (5.36 +/− 0.63 years) were comparable. The demographics of all bearing surface cohorts were similar. The paired comparison between the Oxinium and cobalt chrome cohorts (0.33 vs. 0.29 mm/year, p=0.284) and ceramic vs cobalt chrome cohorts (0.26 vs. 0.20 mm/year, p=0.137) did not demonstrate a significant difference in wear rate. The independent groups analysis revealed a significantly higher wear rate of Oxinium (0.33 mm/year) compared to cobalt chrome (0.24 mm/year) (p = 0. 038). There were no differences in HHS and WOMAC scores between the Oxinium and cobalt chrome cohorts (HHS: p = 0.71, WOMAC: p=0.08) or the ceramic and cobalt chrome cohorts (HHS: p=0.15, WOMAC: p=023). This study presents evidence of a greater wear rate (mm/year) of the Oxinium femoral head component compared to a cobalt chrome femoral head component. This difference was not demonstrated in the ceramic femoral head component. Despite this difference, there were no clinical differences as measured by the HHS and WOMAC. Future research should focus on factors that may contribute to the higher wear rate seen in the Oxinium cohort

Introduction. Experimental wear simulation of an all-polymer knee implant has shown an equivalent rate of wear of UHMWPE tibial components against PEEK-OPTIMA™ and cobalt chrome femoral components of a similar initial geometry and surface topography. However, when the patella is resurfaced with an UHMWPE patella button, it is important to also ascertain the wear of the patella. Wear debris from the patella contributes to the total volume of wear debris produced by the implant which should be minimised to reduce the potential for osteolysis and subsequent implant loosening. The aim of this study was to investigate the wear of the patellofemoral joint in an all-polymer knee implant. The wear of UHMWPE patellae articulating against PEEK-OPTIMA™ femoral components was compared to UHMWPE articulating against cobalt chrome femoral components. Materials and Methods. Six mid-size (size C) PEEK-OPTIMA™ femoral components (Invibio Knee Ltd., UK) and six cobalt chrome femoral components of similar initial surface topography and geometry were coupled with 28mm all-polyethylene GUR1020 patellae (conventional, EO sterile) (Maxx Orthopaedics, USA). The implants were set up in a ProSim 6 station electromechanical knee simulator (Simulation Solutions, UK) which was modified for testing the patellofemoral joint. 3 million cycles (MC) of wear simulation was carried out under kinematics aiming to replicate a gait cycle adapted for an electromechanical simulator from previous work by Maiti et al. The simulator used has six degrees of freedom of which four were controlled; axial force up to 1200N, flexion/extension 22°, superior-inferior (SI) displacement (22mm) and Abduction-adduction (AA) (4°). The SI and AA were displacement controlled and driven through the patella. The medial-lateral displacement and tilt (internal/external rotation) of the patella were passive so the patella button was free to track the trochlear groove. The lubricant used was 25% bovine serum supplemented with 0.03% sodium azide to retard bacterial growth. The wear of patellae was determined gravimetrically with unloaded soak controls used to compensate for the uptake of moisture by the UHMWPE. The mean wear rate ± 95% confidence limits were calculated and statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05. Results. The mean wear rates of the UHMWPE patellae were 0.26±0.21 mm. 3. /MC and 0.35±0.17 mm. 3. /MC against PEEK-OPTIMA™ and cobalt chrome femoral components respectively. There was no significant difference in wear rate against the different femoral component materials (P=0.38). Against both femoral component materials, a ‘bow tie’ shaped wear scar was evident on the patellae typical of that seen in retrieval studies and reported in previous experimental wear simulation of the patellofemoral joint. Conclusion. The wear rate of the UHMWPE patellae was low against both PEEK-OPTIMA™ and cobalt chrome femoral components and comparable to previous work by Vanbiervliet et al. This study further shows that in terms of its wear performance, PEEK-OPTIMA™ has promise as an alternative bearing material to cobalt chrome in the femoral component of total knee replacements

Introduction. UHMWPE articulating against PEEK-OPTIMA® has the potential for use as a novel bearing couple in joint arthroplasty due to its potentially low wear rates and the bioinertness of its wear debris. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of protein in the lubricant on the wear of UHMWPE articulating against PEEK at both room and physiological temperature. Methods. The wear of GUR1020 UHMWPE pins articulating against PEEK plates (R. a. ∼0.06µm) was compared to highly polished cobalt chrome plates (R. a. <0.01µm) in a 6-station multi-axial pin-on-plate rig using kinematics to replicate those in total knee arthroplasty. Tests were carried out at either ∼20°C or ∼36°C and wear was investigated under varying concentrations of bovine serum (0, 25 or 90%). Studies were carried out for 1 Million cycles with wear of the UHMWPE pins assessed gravimetrically using unloaded soak controls to compensate for moisture uptake. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05. Results. Figure 1 shows wear factors for the UHMWPE pins. In 0% serum, the wear of UHMWPE against both PEEK and cobalt chrome tested at room and physiological temperatures was very low. When lubricated with 25% serum and tested at room temperature as per standard practice at Leeds, the wear of UHMWPE against cobalt chrome was comparable to previously published data (2.13×10. −7. mm. 3. /Nm) and the wear of UHMWPE articulating against PEEK was 3.53×10. −7. mm. 3. /Nm. At physiological temperatures, the wear of UHMWPE against cobalt chrome was similar to tests at room temperature but against PEEK, there was a significant (p=0.017) decrease in wear factor [1]. The wear of UHMWPE against cobalt chrome was significantly (p=0.003) higher when tested in 90% serum compared to 25% serum at room temperature but this effect was not seen in UHMWPE articulating against PEEK (p=0.38). Testing at elevated temperature in 90% serum significantly (p=0.007) decreased the wear of UHMWPE against cobalt chrome and a deposition, likely to be protein, was evident on the surface of the plates. However, against PEEK, there was no significant difference in wear under the different temperature conditions. Discussion. In pin-on-plate tests of UHMWPE against smooth metal counterfaces, the low wear rate and polymer deposition in tests lubricated with water has previously been observed. A similarly low wear rate has now been observed for UHMWPE against PEEK. Water does not produce adequate boundary lubrication. At 25% and 90% serum and varying temperatures the wear behaviour of UHMWPE against PEEK is not the same as UHMWPE against cobalt chrome. There may be a number of factors contributing to these differences, including surface topography, protein precipitation, protein deposition, differing wear mechanisms and lubrication regimes. For example, UHMWPE-PEEK is a higher friction bearing couple than UHMWPE-CoCr and when tested at elevated temperatures, frictional heating at the bearing surfaces may accelerate protein precipitation and adsorption of protein onto the articulating surfaces which may affect wear. This study shows that testing under different lubricant and environmental conditions can have a significant effect on wear

Introduction. PEEK-OPTIMA™ has been considered as an alternative to cobalt chrome in the femoral component of total knee replacements. Wear simulation studies of both the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints carried out to date have shown an equivalent wear rate of UHMWPE tibial and patella components against PEEK and cobalt chrome (CoCr) femoral components implanted under optimal alignment conditions. In this study, fundamental pin-on-plate studies have been carried out to investigate the wear of UHMWPE-on-PEEK under a wider range of contact pressure and cross-shear conditions. Methods. The study was carried out in a 6 station multi-axial pin-on-plate reciprocating rig. UHMPWE pins (conventional, non- sterile) were articulated against PEEK-OPTIMA™ plates, initial Ra ∼0.02µm. The lubricant used was 25% bovine serum (17g/l) supplemented with 0.03% sodium azide. The contact pressure and cross-shear ratio conditions were selected to replicate those in total knee replacements and to be comparable to previously reported studies of UHMPWE-on-CoCr tested in the same pin-on-plate simulators. Contact pressures from 2.1 to 25.5MPa were created by changing the diameter of the contact face of the pin, the cross-shear ratios ranged from 0 (uniaxial motion) to 0.18. Wear of the UHMWPE pins was measured gravimetrically and the surface topography of the plates assessed using a contacting Form Talysurf. N=6 was carried out for each condition and statistical analysis carried out using ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05. Results. When compared to conventional materials (UHMWPE-on-CoCr), the wear factor of UHMPWE-on-PEEK was generally lower than that of moderately cross-linked UHMWPE-on-CoCr. With increasing contact pressure, there was a trend of decreasing wear factor and a significant difference (p=0.001) in the wear factor of the UHMPWE pins tested under different contact pressures. The wear of UHMWPE-on-PEEK followed a similar trend as that of UHMWPE-on-CoCr. Under uniaxial motion (cross-shear ratio = 0), the wear of UHMWPE was low, introducing multi-axial motion increased the wear of the UHMWPE. There was a significant difference (p<0.01) in the wear factor at different cross-shear ratios however, post hoc analysis showed only the test carried out under unidirectional motion to be significantly different from the other conditions tested. At the conclusion of the studies, there was a polished region in the centre of the plate, however, there was no significant difference in the post-test surface roughness of the plate under any of the conditions tested. Conclusion. The influence of contact pressure and cross-shear ratio on the wear of UHMWPE pins has shown a similar trend when articulating against either PEEK-OPTIMA™ or cobalt chrome plates. The wear factors determined in this study will provide inputs to future computational models which will allow the wear of this all-polymer knee replacement to be investigated under a wider range of clinically relevant conditions

INTRODUCTION. Many studies have looked at the effect of titanium versus cobalt chrome baseplates on backside wear. However, the surface finish of the materials is usually different [1,2]. There may also be subtle locking mechanism design changes [2]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear performance of polyethylene inserts when mated with titanium baseplates to cobalt chrome baseplates, where both have non-polished topside surfaces and an identical locking mechanism. MATERIALS AND METHODS:. A total of three trays per material were used. The titanium trays are intended for cementless application and include a porous titanium surface on the underside, while the cobalt chrome trays are intended for cemented applications. All trays were Triathlon design (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ). Tibial inserts were manufactured from GUR 1020 polyethylene then vacuum/flush packaged and sterilized in nitrogen (30 kGy). Cobalt chrome femoral components were articulated against the tibial inserts. Surface roughness of the baseplates was measured prior to testing using white light interferometry (Zygo, Middlefield, CT). A 6-station knee simulator (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN) was used for testing. A normal walking profile was applied [3]. Testing was conducted for 1 million cycles. A lubricant of Alpha Calf Fraction serum (Hyclone Labs, Logan, UT) diluted to 50% with a pH-balanced 20-mMole solution of deionized water and EDTA was used [4]. The serum solution was replaced and inserts were weighed for wear every 0.5 million cycles. Standard test protocols were used for cleaning, weighing, and assessing the wear loss [5]. Soak control specimens were used to correct for fluid absorption. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS:. White light interferometry measurements (Figure 1) showed a significant difference in surface roughness between the tray materials (p < 0.01). Figure 2 displays the results of wear testing after 1 million cycles, which show no significant difference. Visually, the backside of all inserts showed mild “stenciling” which corresponded to the location of the femoral condyle during the loading cycle. This surface feature transfer phenomenon was less pronounced with the titanium trays. DISCUSSION:. Although criticized as a bearing material, the results of testing show no deleterious effect on wear performance when using titanium baseplates in comparison to cobalt chrome. In fact, the inserts mated with titanium baseplates show a slight improvement in wear performance, although the difference is not statistically significant. Visually, the backside surfaces of the polyethylene mated with titanium baseplates showed less stenciling effect, which may be due to the difference in material properties as well as the difference in surface roughness. In conclusion, the results of our wear simulation show that wear performance was not adversely affected when titanium baseplates were substituted for cobalt chrome baseplates under normal walking kinematics

Purpose. This prospective randomised controlled trial aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of ceramic on ceramic, cobalt chrome on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces at a minimum of five years. Method. One hundred and two primary total hip replacements were performed in ninety one patients between February 2003 and March 2005. All patients were younger than 65 (mean 52.7, 19–64). They were randomised to receive one of the three bearing surfaces. All patients had 28mm articulations with a Reflection uncemented acetabular component and a Synergy stem (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee). Patients were followed up periodically up to at least sixty months following surgery. Outcome measures included WOMAC and SF12 scores. Radiological assessment included implant position, evidence of osteolysis and measurement of linear wear. Results. Ninety seven hip replacements in eighty seven patients were available for review at a minimum of five years. Two hips were revised (one for infection and one for periprosthetic fracture), leaving a total of ninety four hips available for final review. There were no differences in age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, level of activity, and comorbidities between the three groups. At a minimum of five years there were no statistical differences in the clinical outcomes using the WOMAC or SF12 scores. Three patients in the ceramic group reported squeaking. Radiological evaluation revealed mean annual wear rates in the ceramic group of 0.006mm/yr, standard polyethylene of 0.151mm/yr and highly cross linked polyethylene of 0.059mm/yr. ANOVA analysis revealed these differences in wear rates to be significant (p<0.0001). Conclusion. In the mid term there are no differences in clinical outcome between ceramic on ceramic, cobalt chrome on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Radiologically there was little evidence of linear wear in the ceramic group. Cobalt chrome on ultra high weight polyethylene has a significantly greater annual linear wear rate than that of cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene

Aim. This prospective randomised controlled trial aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of ceramic on ceramic, cobalt chrome on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces at a minimum of five years. Methods. One hundred and two primary total hip replacements were performed in ninety one patients between February 2003 and March 2005. All patients were younger than 65 (mean 52.7, 19-64). They were randomised to receive one of the three bearing surfaces. All patients had 28mm articulations with a Reflection uncemented acetabular component and a Synergy stem (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee). Patients were followed up periodically up to at least sixty months following surgery. Outcome measures included WOMAC and SF12 scores. Radiological assessment included implant position, evidence of osteolysis and measurement of linear wear. Results. Ninety seven hip replacements in eighty seven patients were available for review at a minimum of five years. Two hips were revised (one for infection and one for periprosthetic fracture), leaving a total of ninety four hips available for final review. There were no differences in age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, level of activity, and comorbidities between the three groups. At a minimum of five years there were no statistical differences in the clinical outcomes using the WOMAC or SF12 scores. Three patients in the ceramic group reported squeaking. Radiological evaluation revealed mean annual wear rates in the ceramic group of 0.006mm/yr, standard polyethylene of 0.151mm/yr and highly cross linked polyethylene of 0.059mm/yr. ANOVA analysis revealed these differences in wear rates to be significant (p<0.0001). Conclusions. In the mid term there are no differences in clinical outcome between ceramic on ceramic, cobalt chrome on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Radiologically there was little evidence of linear wear in the ceramic group. Cobalt chrome on ultra high weight polyethylene has a significantly greater annual linear wear rate than that of cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene

Introduction. When third body particles originating from bone cement or bone void fillers become trapped between articulating surfaces of joint replacements, contact surfaces may be damaged leading to accelerated wear and premature failure of the implant. In this study, the damage to cobalt chrome counterfaces by third body particles from PMMA bone cement (GMV, DePuy) and various bone void fillers was investigated; then wear tests of UHMWPE were carried out against these surfaces. Methods. Third body particles of polymerised GMV bone cement and the bone void fillers; OsteoSet (with tobramycin), Stimulan and Stimulan+ (with vancomycin and tobramycin) (provided by Biocomposites Ltd.) were trapped between an UHMWPE pin and a highly polished cobalt chrome plate. A load of 120N was applied to the pin and using an Instron materials testing machine, the plate was pulled beneath the pin to recreate third body damage [1]. The resulting surface topography of the plate was analysed using white light interferometry (Bruker NPFLEX). Pin on plate wear tests of GUR 1020 UHMWPE pins were carried out against the plates perpendicular to the direction of damage for 500,000 cycles in 25% bovine serum using a 6-station multi-axial reciprocating rig under conditions to replicate the kinematics in total knee replacement. Wear of the pins was determined by gravimetric analysis and results were compared to negative (highly polished) control plates and positive controls scratched with a diamond stylus (lip height 2µm). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05. Results. Following damage simulation with Stimulan and Stimulan+, no scratches could be seen on the surface of the cobalt chrome plates using a stereomicroscope under 63× magnification (Figure 1). Table 1 shows that OsteoSet caused surface damage with the highest density of scratches, which had a greater mean lip height than those caused by the other third body materials. Stimulan+ caused significantly (p=0.002) fewer scratches than Osteoset and the surface damage caused by Stimulan was below the resolution of the surface analysis measurement technique used. The pin on plate wear test showed that under the test conditions used, the wear of UHMWPE was similar (p=0.108) for negative control plates and plates scratched with third body particles and a significant (p<0.001) increase in wear was only observed against the positive control plates [2]. Discussion. This study shows that third body particles originating from bone cement and bone void fillers can damage the surface of highly polished cobalt chrome plates and that materials of similar composition can cause varying severity of damage. Wear tests against plates damaged with third body particles did not significantly affect the wear of UHMWPE and to significantly increase wear, scratches needed to have a lip height of 2µm or above

We report a case of fatal heart failure caused by cobalt intoxication after revision THR in the patient who successfully underwent re-revision THR. 53-year old male presented to emergency room in our hospital with progressive shortness of breath. Symptom was started about 6 months ago so he visited local hospital. He worked up for worsening dyspnea. Simple chest radiograph and enhanced heart MRI study were performed and they showed bilateral pericardial and pleural effusion. There was no evidence of ischemic change. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed the evidence of heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction(EF) was 40%. He was admitted at local hospital and started on vasopressors but urine output was decreased and follow-up echocardiogram showed a 25% of EF. Patient recommended heart transplantation and transferred our hospital emergency room. He underwent sequential bilateral total hip arthroplasties using CoP bearing surfaces. At 12 years postoperatively, he presented to the other hospital with acute onset of left hip pain. He was diagnosed ceramic head fracture on his left hip. Head and liner change revision surgery was performed using Cobalt-Chrome alloy 28mm metal head and Protruded cross-linked polyethylene liners. In our hospital, the patient admitted cardiovascular department of internal medicine. Patient complained nonspecific fatigue and general weakness but had no other symptoms such as visual and hearing loss, cognitive dysfuction. During work-up, patient presented progressive left hip pain and complaint of discomfort for the mass on the left groin. He also complained Left leg weakness and numbness. Simple radiograph and enhanced CT study was done. Simple radiograph image shows radiodense area around the hip joint and radiologist suspected heterotopic ossification. The cardiovascular department consulted orthopedic department. In the image findings showed huge mass combined hemorrhagic component lining acetabular component extending psoas compartment and eccentric wear on cobalt-chrome alloy metal head. Also highly radiodense material was seen around neck inferor portion and severly deformed metal head was seen. It was highly suspected that metal related granuloma, which means severe metallosis. Performed heavy metals screen, cobalt levels were 397,800 μg/Land chrome levels were 236,000 μg/L suggesting cobalt toxicity. Hip joint aspiration was done for decompression as radiologic intervention and EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetate) chelation therapy started immediately. After 10 cycle chelating therapy, metal level was lowered cobalt levels by 255.2μg/L and chrome levels by 39.5 μg/L. When hospital day after 134, Medical condition of the patient was getting improved, we underwent revision surgery using ceramic on ceramic bearing surface. The patient discharged postoperative 79 days. Final heavy metals screen results were 27.79μg/L on cobalt and 22.17μg/L on chrome. Although there were also reported a good clinical result of revision surgery using MoP bearing, and some surgeons reluctant to use CoC articulation because of concerns about re-fracture of ceramic. But take into account like this devastating complication after cobalt-chrome wear caused by remained ceramic particles, we should carefully select which bearing is safer

Introduction. Calcium sulfate bone void fillers (CS-BVF) are increasingly being used for dead space management in infected arthroplasty revision surgery. The use of loose beads of CS-BVF close to the articulating surfaces of an implant means there is potential for them to migrate between the articulating surfaces acting as a third body particle. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of CS-BVF on the third body wear of total knee replacements. Methods. The influence of CS-BVF on wear was investigated using the commercially available CS-BVF ‘Stimulan’ (Biocomposites Ltd., UK) and posterior stabilised U2 total knee replacement system implants (United Orthopaedic Corp., Taiwan). The experimental wear simulation was performed using a six station ProSim electropneumatic knee simulator (Simulation Solutions, UK) running the Leeds intermediate kinematics input profile [1]. To investigate the damage that could be caused by the third body particles, 5cc of CS-BVF beads (excess) were placed on the tibial component of the implant, the simulator was run dry for 60 cycles before adding lubricant (25% bovine serum supplemented with 0.03% sodium azide) and running for an additional 115,000 cycles representative of the 6–8 weeks the CS-BVF are present in the body prior to their resorption. The surface topography of the cobalt chrome femorals was analysed using contacting profilometry to ascertain whether the third body particles of CS-BVF had damaged the surfaces. To investigate the influence of CS-BVF on the third body wear of the UHMWPE tibials, 3 million cycles (MC) of wear simulation was subsequently carried out. The wear of the UHMWPE tibials was assessed gravimetrically and the wear of implants tested with CS-BVF was compared to the wear against negative controls (initial Ra∼0.02µm) and positive controls (initial Ra ∼0.4µm) damaged with a diamond stylus. N=6 was completed for each condition, statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05. Results. Light scratching was visible on the surface of the cobalt chrome femorals after the implants were challenged with the CS-BVF, however, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the surface roughness of the negative controls and those challenged with CS-BVF for any of the roughness parameters of interest (Table 1 & Figure 1). 3MC of wear simulation showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between implants subjected to the third body wear protocol and the negative controls (Figure 2). To significantly increase the wear of the UHMWPE tibials, the damage to the cobalt chrome femorals had to be above a threshold as in the positive controls scratched with a diamond stylus. Conclusions. This study showed that the CS-BVF ‘Stimulan’ had no influence on the third body wear or surface topography of total knee replacements compared to negative controls. Therefore, when used close to articulating surfaces of a metal-on-polyethylene joint replacement, CS-BVF may not influence the wear of an implant or be detrimental to its longevity

This prospective randomised controlled trial aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of ceramic on ceramic, cobalt chrome on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces at a minimum of five years. One hundred and two primary total hip replacements were performed in ninety one patients between February 2003 and March 2005. All patients were younger than 65 (mean 52.7, 19–64). They were randomised to receive one of the three bearing surfaces. All patients had 28mm articulations with a Reflection uncemented acetabular component and a Synergy stem (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee). Patients were followed up periodically up to at least sixty months following surgery. Outcome measures included WOMAC and SF12 scores. Radiological assessment included implant position, evidence of osteolysis and measurement of linear wear. Ninety seven hip replacements in eighty seven patients were available for review at a minimum of five years. Two hips were revised (one for infection and one for periprosthetic fracture), leaving a total of ninety four hips available for final review. There were no differences in age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, level of activity, and co-morbidities between the three groups. At a minimum of five years there were no statistical differences in the clinical outcomes using the WOMAC or SF12 scores. Three patients in the ceramic group reported squeaking. Radiological evaluation revealed mean annual wear rates in the ceramic group of 0.006mm/yr, standard polyethylene of 0.151mm/yr and highly cross linked polyethylene of 0.059mm/yr. ANOVA analysis revealed these differences in wear rates to be significant (p<0.0001). In the mid term there are no differences in clinical outcome between ceramic on ceramic, cobalt chrome on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene has a significantly greater annual linear wear rate than highly cross-linked polyethylene

The selection of an acetabular component for primary hip arthroplasty has narrowed significantly over the past 10 years. Although monoblock components demonstrated excellent long-term success the difficulty with insertion and failure to fully appreciate full coaptation of contact with the acetabular floor has led to almost complete elimination of its utilization. Modular acetabular components usually with titanium shells and highly crosslinked polyethylene are by far the most utilised today. This is particularly true with mid-term results demonstrating excellent wear rates and extremely low failure rates and the concern of possible mechanical failure of highly crosslinked polyethylene not being a clinical problem. Ceramic liners are also used but problems with squeaking articulations and liner chipping have made highly crosslinked polyethylene the preferred liner material. Metal-on-metal except in surface replacement arthroplasty is rarely used in primary hip arthroplasty. With instability in total hip replacement still being a significant and the leading cause of revision hip replacement the dual mobility articulation has emerged as an increasingly used acetabular component. This is composed of either a monoblock cobalt chrome socket articulating with a large polyethylene liner into which the femoral head is constrained. The polyethylene liner becomes essentially a larger femoral head articulation and hip stability is significantly improved. A modular dual mobility can also be utilised with a titanium shell and a cobalt chrome liner inserted into the shell and then a dual mobility articulation. In a recent series of 182 dual mobility cups, all monoblock ADM, in high risk patients undergoing primary total hip replacement there was 1 interprosthetic dislocation which occurred during reduction of a dislocation. Average follow up was 4.4 years with a range of 2–6.6 years