Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of cemented TKR using either oxidized zirconium (oxinium) or cobalt chrome (CoCr) femoral components in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKR. Patients involved in the study received one of each prosthesis, thereby acting as their own control. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the clinical and radiographic outcome between the two prosthetic materials.
Forty consecutive patients who were undergoing bilateral Genesis ll TKR consented to participate in the study. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at five days, six weeks and one, two and five years, postoperatively. The outcome measures included the KOOS, Knee Society Score, BOA Patient Satisfaction Scale, and radiographs at six weeks and one, two and five years. In two patients polyethlylene exchange was performed at 56 months from surgery during patellofemoral resurfacing. The four retrieved polyethylene liners were studied for wear with the aid of a stereo zoom microscope and an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Both the patients and the all examiners were blinded as to the prosthesis type throughout the study.
Forty patients (80 knees) were included in the study. At five years, three patients were deceased and two had developed senile dementia. No patients were lost to follow up. At five years from surgery the CoCr knee was preferred by 41% of patients compared to 13% who preferred the Oxinium knee (p=0.009). There was no significant difference in range of motion between the two prosthesis at five days, six weeks or one, two and five years. There were also no significant differences between the two prostheses in any of the other variables assessed. The four retrieved polyethylene inserts showed similar patterns of wear in terms of both wear types and patterns under examination with both the stereo zoom and scanning electron microscope with no clear differences between CoCr and Oxinium bearing against the polyethlylene. There was no difference in the grade or incidence of radiographic lucencies between the two prosthesis at five years.
At five years after surgery the only significant difference between the Genesis II Oxinium prosthesis and the CoCr prosthesis was a subjective preference for the CoCr prosthesis by a higher proportion of patients. There were no unexpected complications associated with the use the Oxinium femoral implants. In the four retrieved polyethylene liners, no significant differences were identified between the two prosthesis materials in terms of detectable wear type and patterns. Continued follow up of this cohort is planned to establish whether Oxinium femoral implants have an improved survivorship compared to CoCr femoral component in total knee replacement to warrant the additional cost.
