Abstract
Introduction
There is a demand for longer lasting arthroplasty implants driving the investigation of novel material combinations. PEEK has shown promise as an arthroplasty bearing material, with potentially relatively bio inert wear debris [1]. When coupled with an all-polyethylene tibial component this combination shows potential as a metal-free knee. In this study, the suitability of PEEK Optima® as an alternative to cobalt chrome for the femoral component of total knee replacements was assessed using experimental knee wear simulation under two kinematic conditions.
Methods
Three cobalt chrome and three injection moulded PEEK Optima® (Invibio Biomaterial Solutions, UK) femoral components of similar geometry and surface roughness (mean surface roughness (Ra) ∼0.02µm) were coupled with all-polyethylene GUR1020 (conventional, unsterilised) tibial components in a 6 station ProSim knee simulator (Simulation Solutions, UK). 3 million cycles (MC) of wear simulation were carried out under intermediate kinematics (maximum anterior-posterior (AP) displacement 5mm) followed by 3MC under high kinematics (AP 10mm) [2] with 25% serum as the lubricant. The wear of the tibial component was assessed gravimetrically. At each measurement point, the surface roughness of the femoral components was determined using contacting profilometry and throughout testing, the bulk lubricant temperature was monitored close to the articulating surfaces.
Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA, with significance at p<0.05.
Results
Figure 1 shows the wear rate of the all-polyethylene tibial components. After 3MC of intermediate kinematics, the mean wear rate of UHMWPE articulating against cobalt chrome was 1.0±2.3mm3/MC and against PEEK was similar (p=0.06) 2.5±0.8mm3/MC. Scratches were apparent on the surface of the PEEK implant in the AP direction significantly (p<0.05) increasing mean surface roughness of the PEEK components (Table 1) compared to pre-test values. The surface topography of the cobalt chrome components (Table 2) was similar to pre-test measurements. Increasing AP displacement caused no significant increase in the wear of the tibial inserts against either material.
Under intermediate kinematics, the mean bulk lubricant temperature was 28.0±0.7°C for cobalt chrome and significantly higher (p<0.001) for PEEK, 29.5±0.1°C; kinematic conditions had no effect on the lubricant temperature.
Conclusions
This study showed a similar wear rate of all-polyethylene tibial components against PEEK and cobalt chrome femoral components of similar initial surface topography and geometry. Wear simulation with a higher AP displacement did not increase the wear of the polyethylene, in contrast to other designs of knee replacements, potentially due to the low conforming geometry of the implant [3]. The linear scratching on the surface of the PEEK implants did not increase the wear rate of the tibial components and the surface did not deteriorate further between 3 and 6 MC. A higher mean lubricant temperature was measured with PEEK femoral components, which was attributed to the higher friction of the PEEK-PE bearing couple. However it is not known whether this is clinically relevant or an artefact of the continuous running of the simulator.
PEEK Optima® shows promise as the femoral component in a metal-free knee.
