Background and aim. Recent proposals have been introduced to modify stem design and/or femoral fixation in total hip replacement (THR). New designs need to consider previous design features and their results. The aim of this study has been to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of six different designs of tapered uncemented stems implanted in our Institution. Methods. 1918 uncemented hips were prospectively assessed from 1999 to 2011 (minimum follow-up of five years for the unrevised hips). All hips had a 28 or 32 mm femoral head and metal-on-polyethylene or alumina-on-alumina bearing surface. Six uncemented femoral designs that shared a femoral tapered stem incorporating a coating surface were included in the study. The different design features included the type of coating, metaphyseal filling, and sectional shape. Results. Intra-operative proximal femoral crack was 6.7% in one of the designs (p=0.01), univariate analysis showing a lower risk of crack in the other designs. The position of the stem was neutral in 80% of the cases for all designs. Femoral canal filing was related to the stem design (p<0.001 at the three levels) and to the femoral level assessed (subset alpha=0.005). Twelve stems were revised for aseptic loosening (6 from two different designs). The survival rate for femoral aseptic loosening at 15 years was 96.6% (95% CI 93.8 to 99.4) for one of these two designs ad 97.4% (95% CI95.5 to 99.6) for the other. Regression analysis showed that stem design was the only factor related to aseptic loosening when adjusted for femoral canal filling (at the three levels) stem position (neutral or not) and femoral type (cylindrical or not). Conclusion. Tapered uncemented stems consistently provide excellent bone fixation. New designs need to avoid changing successful features and concentrate on the less successful aspects

INTRODUCTION. Combining novel diverse population-based software with a clinically-demonstrated implant design is redefining total hip arthroplasty. This contemporary stem design utilized a large patient database of high-resolution CT bone scans in order to determine the appropriate femoral head centers and neck lengths to assist in the recreation of natural head offset, designed to restore biomechanics. There are limited studies evaluating how radiographic software utilizing reference template bone can reconstruct patient composition in a model. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the application of a modern analytics system utilizing 3D modeling technology in the development of a primary stem was successful in restoring patient biomechanics, specifically with regards to femoral offset (FO) and leg length discrepancy (LLD). METHODS. Two hundred fifty six patients in a non-randomized, post-market multicenter study across 7 sites received a primary cementless fit and fill stem. Full anteroposterior pelvis and Lauenstein cross-table lateral x-rays were collected preoperatively and at 6-weeks postoperative. Radiographic parameters including contralateral and operative FO and LLD were measured. Preoperative and postoperative FO and LLD of the operative hip were compared to the normal, native hip. Clinical outcomes including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), Short Form 12 (SF12), and EuroQol 5D Score (EQ-5D) were collected preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, and at 1 year. RESULTS. The mean age is 62 years old (range 32 – 75), 136 male and 120 female, BMI 29.7. The preoperative FO and LLD of the operative hip were 43.5 mm (±9.0 mm) and 3.0 mm (±6.5 mm) compared to the native contralateral hip, respectively. The postoperative FO and LLD were 46.4 mm (±8.7 mm) and 1.6 mm (±7.6 mm) compared to the native contralateral hip, respectively. The change in FO on the operative side was 3.0 mm (±7.2 mm) (p<0.0001) and the change in LLD from preoperative to 6-weeks postoperative was 1.6 mm (±8.4 mm) (p=0.0052) (Figure 1), demonstrating the ability of this stem design to recreate normal hip biomechanics in this study. The HHS increased considerably from a preoperative score of 55.9 to 78.4 at 6 weeks and 92.7 at 1 year. Clinically significant improvements were also seen at 1 year in the LEAS (+2.3), SF12 PCS (+16.3), and EQ-5D TTO (+0.26) and the EQ-5D VAS (+15.7). DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION. This study demonstrated that recreation of normal anatomic leg length and offset is possible by utilizing a modern fit and fill stem that was designed by employing an advanced anthropomorphic database of CT scans. We hypothesize that when surgeons utilize this current fit and fill stem design, it will allow them to accurately recreate a patient's natural FO and leg length, assisting in the restoration of patient biomechanics. Summary Sentence. In this study, modern design methods of a press-fit stem using 3D modeling tools recreated natural femoral offset and leg length, assisting in the restoration of patient biomechanics

Introduction. Resorptive bone remodeling secondary to stress shielding has been a concern associated with cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). At present, various types of cementless implants are commercially available. The difference in femoral stem design may affect the degree of postoperative stress shielding. In the present study, we aimed to compare the difference in bone mineral density (BMD) change postoperatively in femurs after the use of 1 of the 3 types of cementless stems. Methods. Ninety hips of 90 patients who underwent primary cementless THA for the treatment of osteoarthritis were included in this study. A fit-and-fill type stem was used for 28 hips, a tapered-rectangular Zweymüller type stem was used for 32 hips, and a tapered-wedge type stem was used for 30 hips. The male/female ratio of the patients was 7/21 in the fit-and-fill type stem group, 6/26 in the tapered-rectangular Zweymüller type stem group, and 6/24 in the tapered-wedge type stem group. The mean age at surgery was 59.9 (39–80) in the fit-and-fill type stem group, 61.7 (48–84) in the tapered-rectangular Zweymüller type stem group and 59.6 (33–89) in the tapered-wedge type stem group. To assess BMD change after THA, we obtained dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. Results. There were no differences in demographic data, such as gender, age at surgery, and body mass index, among the 3 groups (Table1). In terms of BMD change after THA, no differences were observed in Gruen zones 1–5 among the 3 groups during the 3-year follow-up. The BMD in Gruen zone 6 was maintained in the tapered-wedge type stem group, but decreased by 5% in the fit-and-fill type stem group and by 20% in the tapered-rectangular Zweymüller type stem group (p < 0.01). The BMD loss in Gruen zone 7 was observed in all stem types; however, the BMD loss at 36 months in the tapered-wedge type stem group (−15%) was significantly less than that of the other 2 groups (the fit-and-fill type stem group: −29%; the tapered-rectangular Zweymüller type stem group: −30%; p < 0.001 for both groups) (Figure). Discussion and Conclusion. A difference in postoperative BMD loss was observed among the 3 stem designs. This may be a result of the different fixation concept associated with each stem design. In the present study, we compared the postoperative BMD change after THA among a fit-and-fill type stem, a tapered-rectangular Zweymüller type stem, and a tapered-wedge type stem. BMD in the medial-proximal femur was maintained 3 years after THA in the group with the tapered-wedge type stem, which is fixed in a more proximal part of the femur compared to the other stems

Introduction:. Extensive bone defects of the proximal femur e.g. due to aseptic loosening might require the implantation of megaprostheses. In the literature high loosening rates of such megaprostheses have been reported. However, different fixation methods have been developed to achieve adequate implant stability, which is reflected by differing design characteristics of the commonly used implants. Yet, a biomechanical comparison of these designs has not been reported. The aim of our study was to analyse potential differences in the biomechanical behaviour of three megaprostheses with different designs by measuring the primary rotational stability in vitro. Methods:. Four different stem designs [Group A: Megasystem-C® (Link), Group B: MUTARS®(Implantcast), Group C: GMRS™ (Stryker) and Group D: Segmental System (Zimmer); see Fig. 1] were implanted into 16 Sawbones® after generating a segmental AAOS Typ 2 defect. Using an established method to analyse the rotational stability, a cyclic axial torque of ± 7.0 Nm along the longitudinal stem axis was applied. Micromotions were measured at defined levels of the bone and the implant [Fig. 2]. The calculation of relative micromotions at the bone-implant interface allowed classifying the rotational implant stability. Results:. All four different implants exhibited low micromotions, indicating adequate primary stability. Lowest micromotions for all designs were located near the femoral isthmus [Fig. 3]. The extent of primary stability and the global implant fixation pattern differed considerably and could be related to the different design concepts. Discussion:. Compared to other implant designs, all stems resulted in low relative motions regardless their design. The conical Megasystem-C® stem seems to lock in the proximal isthmus of the femur, whereas the MUTARS® stem seems to have a total fixation. Its hexagonal cross-section might have a good interlocking effect against rotational force application. Similarly, the GMRS™ stem shows a total fixation with little tendency to the distal part. The very rough porous-coated surface seems to generate a comparable fixation method to the hexagonal MUTARS® stem. However, the four longitudinal expansions in the proximal part of the GMRS™ stem might not have such a high rotational stability effect as expected. Compared to the other stems, the Segmental System stem showed very low relative micromotions in the proximal part. This sharp fluted stem seems to engrave itself into the bone. Within this study all stems seemed to achieve an adequate primary rotational stability. We could show that stem design could qualitatively and quantitatively influence the initial fixation behavior of megaprostheses regarding biomechanical tests, like primary stability measurements in synthetic femurs. These experiences should be considered regarding the choice of stem fixation design in specific defect situations

Background

There is increasing impetus to use rapid recovery care pathways when treating patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The direct anterior (DA) approach is a muscle sparing technique that is believed to support these new pathways. Implants designed for these approaches are available in both collared and collarless variations and understanding the impact each has is important for providing the best treatment to patients.

Increasing pressure to use rapid recovery care pathways when treating patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) is evident in current health care systems for numerous reasons. Patient autonomy and health care economics has challenged the ability of THA implants to maintain functional integrity before achieving bony union. Although collared stems have been shown to provide improved axial stability, it is unclear if this stability correlates with activity levels or results in improved early function to patients compared to collarless stems. This study aims to examine the role of implant design on patient activity and implant fixation. The early follow-up period was examined as the majority of variation between implants is expected during this time-frame.

Patients (n=100) with unilateral hip OA who were undergoing primary THA surgery were recruited pre-operatively to participate in this prospective randomized controlled trial. All patients were randomized to receive either a collared (n=50) or collarless (n=50) cementless femoral stem. Patients will be seen at nine appointments (pre-operative, < 2 4 hours post-operation, two-, four-, six-weeks, three-, six-months, one-, and two-years). Patients completed an instrumented timed up-and-go (TUG) test using wearable sensors at each visit, excluding the day of their surgery. Participants logged their steps using Fitbit activity trackers and a seven-day average prior to each visit was recorded. Patients also underwent supine radiostereometric analysis (RSA) imaging < 2 4 hours post-operation prior to leaving the hospital, and at all follow-up appointments.

Nineteen collared stem patients and 20 collarless stem patients have been assessed. There were no demographic differences between groups. From < 2 4 hours to two weeks the collared implant subsided 0.90 ± 1.20 mm and the collarless implant subsided 3.32 ± 3.10 mm (p=0.014). From two weeks to three months the collared implant subsided 0.65 ± 1.54 mm and the collarless implant subsided 0.45 ± 0.52 mm (p=0.673). Subsidence following two weeks was lower than prior to two weeks in the collarless group (p=0.02) but not different in the collared group. Step count was reduced at two weeks compared to pre-operatively by 4078 ± 2959 steps for collared patients and 4282 ± 3187 steps for collarless patients (p=0.872). Step count increased from two weeks to three months by 6652 ± 4822 steps for collared patients and 4557 ± 2636 steps for collarless patients (p=0.289). TUG test time was increased at two weeks compared to pre-operatively by 4.71 ± 5.13 s for collared patients and 6.54 ± 10.18 s for collarless patients (p=0.551). TUG test time decreased from two weeks to three months by 7.21 ± 5.56 s for collared patients and 8.38 ± 7.20 s for collarless patients (p=0.685). There was no correlation between subsidence and step count or TUG test time.

Collared implants subsided less in the first two weeks compared to collarless implants but subsequent subsidence after two weeks was not significantly different. The presence of a collar on the stem did not affect patient activity and function and these factors were not correlated to subsidence, suggesting that initial fixation is instead primarily related to implant design.

Introduction

There have been many attempts to reduce the risk of femoral component loosening.

Using a tapered stem having a highly polished stem surface results in stem stabilization subsequent to debonding and stem-cement taper-lock and is consistent with force-closed fixation design.

Introduction

Failure of the neck-stem taper in one particular bi-modular primary hip stem due to corrosion and wear of the neck piece has been reported frequently1, and stems were recalled. A specific pattern of material loss on the CoCr neck-piece taper in the areas of highest stresses on the proximal medial male taper was observed in a retrieval study of 27 revised Rejuvenate implants revised after 3 to 38 month time in situ (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) (Figure 1). One neck piece exhibited additionally wear marks at the distal end of the flat male neck taper indicating contact with the female taper of the stem. The purpose of this study was to understand the observed failure scenario of bottoming-out by investigating the stem taper morphologies.

Purpose

One of the drawbacks of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is aseptic loosening after long period, major reason for which is bioinertness of PMMA bone cement. To improve longevity of THA, interface bioactive bone cement (IBBC) technique which is characterized with smearing hydroxyapatite (HA) granules just before cementation has been used in our institute.

The design of the femoral prosthesis in cementless total hip arthroplasty is known to affect the initial strains in the cortex during implantation and in the early postoperative time period. High strains have a direct influence on periprosthetic fracture. This study compares the existing ABGII stem, which is proximally coated with a grit blasted titanium surface with hydroxyapatite coating with a prototype that has a rougher titanium plasma spray proximal coating. The Australian National Joint registry results 2011 reported the ABG2 femoral component cumulative percent revision (CPR) of 6.5 (93.5% survival), which compares favourably with equivalent stems with 10 year CPR data such as the Taperloc 6.6 and Corail 7.3.

Six pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric femurs were mounted in blocks according to ISO guidelines in single leg stance setup. Five strain gauges were attached around the neck of the femur and then prepared according to routine operative techniques to accept the femoral prosthesis. Cortical strains were measured during insertion of the prosthesis with an instrumented mallet attached to an accelerometer. Subsequently, force-displacement readings were taken during cyclical loading on a servo-hydraulic machine and finally the stems were tested to failure.

Our results showed significantly less strain during cyclical loading of the stem with increased surface roughness (p < 0.05). They also showed no significant differences loads/strains during impaction (p = 0.159), no significant difference in micromotion (p = 0.148) and no significant difference in load-to-failure (p = 0.37).

To assess whether prosthetic femoral stem centralisers have a detrimental effect on the macroporosity of the cement mantle, and if so, whether this is independent of their design and the rate of implantation, 30 identically cast moulded prosthetic femora were divided into 3 groups. Group 1: no centraliser (control), Group 2: centraliser A and Group 3: centraliser B. Using third generation cementation techniques and pressure monitoring, Charnley C-stems +/− the appropriate centraliser were implanted to a constant depth. Half in each group were implanted as rapidly as possible and the other half over 90 seconds. The stems were removed and the cement mantle then underwent a preliminary arthroscopic examination prior to being sectioned transversely at 3 constant levels. Each level was then photographed and digitally enlarged to a known scale to allow examination and determination of any cement voids (macropores) surface area.

There were no significant pressure fluctuations between the groups. Preliminary arthroscopic examination revealed that cement voids appeared more common when a centraliser was used. This difference was confirmed (p=0.002) following sectioning of the specimens, with cement voids found in 85% of femora when a centraliser was used and only 20% in the control group. Centraliser B performed worst with cement voids of a larger volume and more frequent occurrence (p=0.002). The macroporosity of the cement mantle was independent of the rate of implantation (p=0.39).

The use of femoral stem centralisers is helpful in preventing malposition of the implant but results in increased macroporosity of the cement mantle. This may have implications regarding the longevity of an implant in terms of early loosening and therefore their design and use must always be carefully considered.

Femoral stem design affects periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), which may impact long term survival of cementless implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to examine proximal femoral BMD in three morphologically different uncemented femoral stems designs to investigate whether one particular design resulted in improved preservation of BMDMethods: 119 patients were randomised to receive either a proximally coated dual taper wedge stem, a proximally coated anatomic stem or a fully coated collarless triple tapered stem. All surgeries were performed via the posterior approach with mobilization on the day of surgery. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans (Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) assessed BMD across the seven Gruen zones pre-operatively, and post-operatively at 6-weeks, 1-year, and 2-years and compared to the unoperated contralateral femur as a control. Patient reported outcome measures of pain, function and health were also included at these corresponding follow-ups. BMD increased in zones one (2.5%), two (17.1%), three (13.0%), five (10%) and six (17.9%) for all stems. Greater preservation of BMD was measured on the lateral cortex (zone 2) for both the dual taper wedge and anatomic stems (p = 0.019). The dual taper wedge stem also demonstrated preservation of BMD in the medial calcar (zone 7) whilst the anatomic and triple taper stem declined in this region, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.059). BMD decreased on average by 2.1% inthe mid-diaphysis region, distal to the stem tip (zone 4) for all implants. All stems performed equivalently at final follow-up in all patient reported outcome measures. This study demonstrated maintenance of femoral BMD in three different cementless femoral stem designs, with all achieving excellent improvements in patient reported outcomes. There was no significant stress shielding observed, however longer follow-up is required to elucidate the impact of this finding on implant survivorship

Shoulder arthroplasty humeral stem design has evolved to accommodate patient anatomy characteristics. As a result, stems are available in numerous shapes, coatings, lengths, sizes, and vary by fixation method. This abundance of stem options creates a surgical paradox of choice. Metrics describing stem stability, including a stem's resistance to subsidence and micromotion, are important factors that should influence stem selection, but have yet to be assessed in response to the diametral (i.e., thickness) sizing of short stem humeral implants. Eight paired cadaveric humeri (age = 75±15 years) were reconstructed with surgeon selected ‘standard’ sized short-stemmed humeral implants, as well as 2mm ‘oversized’ implants. Stem sizing conditions were randomized to left and right humeral pairs. Following implantation, an anteroposterior radiograph was taken of each stem and the metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were quantified. Each humerus was then potted in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and subjected to 2000 cycles of 90º forward flexion loading. At regular intervals during loading, stem subsidence and micromotion were assessed using a validated system of two optical markers attached to the stem and humeral pot (accuracy of <15µm). The metaphyseal fill ratio did not differ significantly between the oversized and standard stems (0.50±0.06 vs 0.50±0.10; P = 0.997, Power = 0.05); however, the diaphyseal fill ratio did (0.52±0.06 vs 0.45±0.07; P < 0.001, Power = 1.0). Neither fill ratio correlated significantly with stem subsidence or micromotion. Stem subsidence and micromotion were found to plateau following 400 cycles of loading. Oversizing stem thickness prevented implant head-back contact in all but one specimen with the least dense metaphyseal bone, while standard sizing only yielded incomplete head-back contact in the two subjects with the densest bone. Oversized stems subsided significantly less than their standard counterparts (standard: 1.4±0.6mm, oversized: 0.5±0.5mm; P = 0.018, Power = 0.748;), and resulted in slightly more micromotion (standard: 169±59µm, oversized: 187±52µm, P = 0.506, Power = 0.094,). Short stem diametral sizing (i.e., thickness) has an impact on stem subsidence and micromotion following humeral arthroplasty. In both cases, the resulting three-dimensional stem micromotion exceeded, the 150µm limit suggested for bone ingrowth, although that limit was derived from a uniaxial assessment. Though not statistically significant, the increased stem micromotion associated with stem oversizing may in-part be attributed to over-compacting the cancellous bed during broaching, which creates a denser, potentially smoother, interface, though this influence requires further assessment. The findings of the present investigation highlight the importance of proper short stem diametral sizing, as even a relatively small, 2mm, increase can negatively impact the subsidence and micromotion of the stem-bone construct. Future work should focus on developing tools and methods to support surgeons in what is currently a subjective process of stem selection

Shoulder arthroplasty is effective at restoring function and relieving pain in patients suffering from glenohumeral arthritis; however, cortex thinning has been significantly associated with larger press-fit stems (fill ratio = 0.57 vs 0.48; P = 0.013)1. Additionally, excessively stiff implant-bone constructs are considered undesirable, as high initial stiffness of rigid fracture fixation implants has been related to premature loosening and an ultimate failure of the implant-bone interface2. Consequently, one objective which has driven the evolution of humeral stem design has been the reduction of stress-shielding induced bone resorption; this in-part has led to the introduction of short stems, which rely on metaphyseal fixation. However, the selection of short stem diametral (i.e., thickness) sizing remains subjective, and its impact on the resulting stem-bone construct stiffness has yet to be quantified. Eight paired cadaveric humeri (age = 75±15 years) were reconstructed with surgeon selected ‘standard’ sized and 2mm ‘oversized’ short-stemmed implants. Standard stem sizing was based on a haptic assessment of stem and broach stability per typical surgical practice. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken, and the metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were quantified. Each humerus was then potted in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and subjected to 2000 cycles of compressive loading representing 90º forward flexion to simulate postoperative seating. Following this, a custom 3D printed metal implant adapter was affixed to the stem, which allowed for compressive loading in-line with the stem axis (Fig.1). Each stem was then forced to subside by 5mm at a rate of 1mm/min, from which the compressive stiffness of the stem-bone construct was assessed. The bone-implant construct stiffness was quantified as the slope of the linear portion of the resulting force-displacement curves. The metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were 0.50±0.10 and 0.45±0.07 for the standard sized stems and 0.50±0.06 and 0.52±0.06 for the oversized stems, respectively. Neither was found to correlate significantly with the stem-bone construct stiffness measure (metaphysis: P = 0.259, diaphysis: P = 0.529); however, the diaphyseal fill ratio was significantly different between standard and oversized stems (P < 0.001, Power = 1.0). Increasing the stem size by 2mm had a significant impact on the stiffness of the stem-bone construct (P = 0.003, Power = 0.971; Fig.2). Stem oversizing yielded a construct stiffness of −741±243N/mm; more than double that of the standard stems, which was −334±120N/mm. The fill ratios reported in the present investigation match well with those of a finite element assessment of oversizing short humeral stems3. This work complements that investigation's conclusion, that small reductions in diaphyseal fill ratio may reduce the likelihood of stress shielding, by also demonstrating that oversizing stems by 2mm dramatically increases the stiffness of the resulting implant-bone construct, as stiffer implants have been associated with decreased bone stimulus4 and premature loosening2. The present findings suggest that even a small, 2mm, variation in the thickness of short stem humeral components can have a marked influence on the resulting stiffness of the implant-bone construct. This highlights the need for more objective intraoperative methods for selecting stem size to provide guidelines for appropriate diametral sizing. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Background. Recent studies indicate the benefits of total hip arthroplasty (THA) by using femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants (March et al 1999). These benefits rely on the preservation of native hip structure and improved physiological loading. However, further investigation is needed to compare the outcome of these implants versus the conventional neck-sacrificing stems particularly assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we have investigated the differences in PROs between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.). We hypothesized higher PROs outcome in patients who received treatment by using neck-preserving implants. Methods. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the pre and post-operative PROs of patients receiving THA treatment by using neck-sacrificing implant (n=90, age 57±7.9 years) and a matched (BMI, age) cohort group of neck-preserving patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years). Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) were using with the follow-up of similar follow up of 412.76 ± 206.98 days (neck sacrificing implant) and 454.63 ± 226.99 days (Neck-Preserving). Multivariate analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney tests were conducted for statistical analyses. Holm-Bonferroni adjusted for multiple comparisons was used with initial significance level of 0.05. Results. Both implants resulted in significant improvement of HOOS Subscores (p<0.001). There was a significant effect of time- surgery interaction (p=0.02). Follow-up HOOS subscores analysis indicated that patients who were treated with neck- preserving stems reported significantly higher Symptoms (p<0.001), Pain (p<0.001), ADL (p=0.011), Sports and Recreation (p=0.011), & QOL (p=0.007) subscores. Conclusion. This study aimed to investigate the short term to medium term outcome of neck-preserving implants. The superior outcome of neck-preserving femoral stems could be a result of more natural physiological loading in femoral cavity and higher retention of bone tissue in femoral neck area. However, further studies are needed to investigate the longer-term outcome of these implants

Introduction. Cementless tapered wedge stems have shown excellent results over the last decade. Distal potting with inadequate proximal fit, as well as failure to achieve biologic fixation has led to thigh pain, loosening and implant failure. To support a variety of patient morphologies a novel tapered wedge stem was designed with reduced distal morphology, maximizing the proximal contact of the grit blasted surface. The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of this stem design. Methods. Three hundred and nineteen patients enrolled into prospective, post-market multicenter studies received a novel tapered wedge stem. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), Short Form 12 (SF12), and Euroqol 5D Score (EQ-5D) were evaluated preoperative through two years postoperative. Results. Demographics of the study population include 53.3% male patients with a mean age of 62.4 ± 9.3 years and BMI of 29.8 ± 4.5. To date, there has been one incidence of thigh pain (0.3%) and a 0.63% aseptic revision rate. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis for the population at two years postoperative estimated 97.87% with 95% CI (93.98% – 99.25%) survivorship to all cause revision (Figure 1). Statistically significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life were seen initially at six weeks postoperative and continued through one year in all of the clinical and patient reported outcome measures (Figure 2). Conclusion. A novel tapered wedge stem was designed to maximize proximal fit medially and laterally across a variety of patient morphologies. Radiographic studies have shown the stem design has significantly better canal fit compared to older tapered wedge designs. The current study exhibits low incidence of thigh pain and revisions, with improvements in function, pain and quality of life after hip arthroplasty with this tapered wedge stem

Introduction. New challenges arise in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as patients are younger and perform higher levels of activity. Implants need to stand increased loads, last longer and improve bone stock conservation. [1]. for future revision. Additive manufacturing allows optimizing the implant shape and material properties imposing few restrictions. The mechanical properties of porous meta-materials can be adjusted by tailoring their meso-structure, allowing for a functional gradation of the material properties (i.e. elastic modulus) throughout the stem. The objective of this paper is to use finite element analysis for optimizing the shape and the functional gradation of material properties distribution of hip stems in order to reduce the bone loss and to obtain lower and more homogeneous interfacial stresses. Methods. The 2D stem geometry (initially Profemur. ®. TL) was parameterized with 8 variables. Limits were established to keep tapered stem shape, avoid intersecting the cortexes and assure proper cortical contact. A functional gradation of the stem's material properties was generated by prescribing the values of the elastic modulus (E) on a 53 points grid. Values for E were between 2 GPa (highly porous meta-material made of Ti6Al4V) and 110 GPa (solid Ti6Al4V). The stem neck and a 1.5 mm layer around the stem were kept solid. Two contradictory objective functions were considered: 1) a function of the total bone loss, accounting for the bone losses due to the resection for the implant insertion and due to stress shielding; 2) a function of the interfacial shear stresses, accounting for their uniformity and value. This multi-objective optimization problem was solved using genetic algorithms for stair climbing load case. [2]. , with 30090 stem design evaluations for a total of 50 generations (iterations). Two representative optimized stem designs were selected to undergo a second step of tailoring their porous meta-material for obtaining the desired material properties distribution. Simple-cubic unit cell was considered at the mesoscale of the porous meta-material, with a fixed unit-cell length of 1.5 mm. The strut diameter at each point of the grid was optimized to match the prescribed E using a previously developed model of porous meta-materials that includes the manufacturing irregularities. [3]. . Results. Fig.1 shows FBLFIS functions for the optimized stem designs at the last generation. For optimized stems FBL=21.5–26.6% and FIS=0.27–3.64; for the original stem design FBL=35.4% and FIS=10.20. Optimized stems are shorter, thinner and less stiff than the original stem design; and they show smaller extent of bone resorption and smaller and more homogeneous interfacial shear stresses (Fig.2). The E distribution is adequately reproduced by the porous material (Fig.2). Conclusion. Combining shape and material properties distribution optimization of hip stems can improve their mechanical compatibility with the bone, reducing the bone loss and interfacial shear stresses. The material properties distribution can be adequately obtained by tailoring additively manufactured porous meta-materials. This is expected to improve the THA long-term outcome and the conditions for future revision. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Introduction. On the basis of a proposal by Noble, the marrow cavity form can be classified into three categories: normal, champagne-fluted and stovepipe. In the present study, three typical finite element femoral models were created using CT data based on Noble's three categories. The purpose was to identify the relationship of stress distribution of the surrounding areas between femoral bone marrow cavity form and hip stems. The results shed light on whether the distribution of the high-stress area reflects the stem design concept. In order to improve the results of THA, researchers need to consider the instability of a stem design based on the stress distributioin and give feedback on future stem selection. Methods. As analyzing object, we selected SL-PLUS and BiCONTACT stems. To develop finite element models, two parts (cortical bone and stem) were constructed using four-node tetrahedral elements. The model consisted of about 60,000 elements. The material characteristics were defined by the combination of mass density, elastic coefficient, and Poisson's ratio. Concerning the analysis system, HP Z800 Workstation was used as hardware and LS-DYNA Ver. 971 as software. The distal end of the femur was constrained in all directions. On the basis of ISO 7206 Part 4,8 that specifies a method of endurance testing for joint prostheses, the stem was tilted 10°, and a 1500 N resultant force in the area around the hip joint was applied to the head at an angle of 25° with the long axis. Automatic contact with a consideration of slip was used. Result. The maximum stress on femur implanted a SL-PLUS with marrow cavity form of normal, champagne-fluted and stovepipe were shown to be 90MPa, 90MPa and 45MPa. The maximum stress on a BiCONTACT with marrow cavity form of normal, champagne-fluted and stovepipe were shown to be 45MPa, 90MPa and 15MPa. Discussion. The design concept for aZweymüller-type stem can distribute load across a wide range of cortical bone from the middle position to the distal femur. It is determined using this concept that a wide range of stress was absorbed at the middle position and distal femur in the champagne-fluted and normal cases. On the other hand, the contact pressure zone of stovepipe could not meet the expected level at the distal femur. The method of this research involves controlling the stress conditions within the stem design. At this point, it is considered possible for the stability of various stem designs to be predicted and the stability to be assessed positively. On the basis of Noble's categories, three types of finite element model were made, and stress distribution measurement and finite element analyses were performed. The results indicate that Zweymüller stem has clinical validity for securing force in the champagne-fluted and stovepipe types from the stress distribution

Introduction. According to proposal of Noble, the femoral bone marrow cavity form of patients who underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) can be classified under 3 categories; those are Stovepipe, Normal and Champagne-fluted. We developed typical sodium chloride femoral model was created by 3D prototyping technique. The purpose was to identify the relationship of pressure zone of the surrounding areas between femoral bone marrow cavity form and hip stem. Materials and Method. As opponent clarified stem design concept Zweymüller type model was used. According to CT data with the patients who underwent THA, the sodium chloride femoral model was custom-made and selected as the representative model based on Noble's 3 categories. Eight models of each category were used to performed mechanical test. Result. In mechanics test, the result of comparison between the contact pressure zones of zone 1–7, significant differences of contact pressure zones were identified between the Stovepipe group and Normal group in zone 3, 4 and 5. In zone 3 and 5, such significant differences were also identified between Champagne-fluted group and Normal group. In Stovepipe group, a significant difference of the contact pressure zone was observed at the proximal and distal. In Champagne-fluted group and the Normal group, a significant difference was observed in the contact pressure in distal femur (3, 4, 5 Zone) and (Zone1, 2, 6, 7) proximal femur. Discussion. Although in most studies Sawbone® is used for femoral models, the focus of this research is of those who possess a characteristic femur with marrow cavity form. Therefore, sodium chloride bone model was used instead. In comparison in terms of applicability between sodium chloride bone model and regular model, the failure of all 24 joints of sodium chloride bone model were unconfirmed in mechanics test. Moreover, the possibility that its performance in mechanics test is equivalent to Sawbone®is considered. The design concept for Zweymüller type achieves the ability to load distribute within a wide range of cortical bone across the middle position to distal femur. It's determined by the concept that a wide range of contact pressure was admitted at middle position and distal femur in the Champagne-fluted group and the Normal group. On the other hand, the contact pressure zone of Stovepipe was not able to meet the expected level at distal femur. The method of this research is control its stress condition within the stem design. By this point, it is considered possible that the stability of various stem design was able to be forecasted and the assessment of stableness was positive. Conclusion. On the basis of Noble's categories, 3 types of bone models were created by 3D prototyping technique, and pressure distribution measurement were performed. The result from the pressure distribution indicated that even in Zweymüller stem had anxiety of securing force in Champagne-fluted type and Stovepipe type canal. We believe the method of in vivo study can develop to assess the stability of implant preoperatively

Introduction. On the basis of a proposal by Noble, the marrow cavity form can be classified into three categories: stovepipe, normal, and champagne-fluted. In the present study, three typical finite element femoral models were created using CT data based on Noble's three categories. The purpose was to identify the relationship of stress distribution of the surrounding areas between femoral bone marrow cavity form and hip stem. The results shed light on whether the distribution of the high-stress area reflects the stem design concept. In order to improve the results of THA, researchers need to consider the instability of a stem design based on the pressure zone and give feedback on future stem selection. Methods. To develop finite element models, two parts (cortical bone and stem) were constructed using four-node tetrahedral elements. The model consisted of about 40,000 elements. The material characteristics were defined by the combination of mass density, elastic coefficient, and Poisson's ratio. Concerning the analysis system, HP Z800 Workstation(HP, Japan) was used as hardware and LS-DYNA Ver. 971 (Livermore Software Technology Corporation, USA) as software. The distal end of the femur was constrained in all directions. On the basis of ISO 7206 Part 4,8 that specifies a method of endurance testing for joint prostheses, the stem was tilted 10°, and a 500 N resultant force in the area around the hip joint was applied to the head at an angle of 25° with the long axis. Automatic contact with a consideration of slip was used. Von Mises stress during a 1.0 s period after loading was analyzed, and stress distribution in the stem and its maximum value were calculated. Result. The maximum stress at marrow cavity form of normal was shown to be 72 MPa. The stress of champagne-fluted was evenly distributed from proximal to distal, and the maximum stress was 67 MPa. For stovepipe, the maximum proximal stress was shown to be 120 MPa; moreover, stress concentration was observed. Discussion. The design concept for a Zweymüller-type stem can distribute load across a wide range of cortical bone from the middle position to the distal femur. It is determined using this concept that a wide range of stress was absorbed at the middle position and distal femur in the champagne-fluted and normal cases. On the other hand, the contact pressure zone of stovepipe could not meet the expected level at the distal femur. The method of this research involves controlling the stress conditions within the stem design. At this point, it is considered possible for the stability of various stem designs to be predicted and the stability to be assessed positively. On the basis of Noble's categories, three types of finite element model were made, and stress distribution measurement and finite element analyses were performed. The results indicate that Zweymüller stem has clinical validity for securing force in the champagne-fluted and stovepipe types from the stress distribution