Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

*Cadaveric Strain Gauge and Micromotion Analysis of a New Stem Design With Increased Surface Roughness of Proximal Coating

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA)



Abstract

The design of the femoral prosthesis in cementless total hip arthroplasty is known to affect the initial strains in the cortex during implantation and in the early postoperative time period. High strains have a direct influence on periprosthetic fracture. This study compares the existing ABGII stem, which is proximally coated with a grit blasted titanium surface with hydroxyapatite coating with a prototype that has a rougher titanium plasma spray proximal coating. The Australian National Joint registry results 2011 reported the ABG2 femoral component cumulative percent revision (CPR) of 6.5 (93.5% survival), which compares favourably with equivalent stems with 10 year CPR data such as the Taperloc 6.6 and Corail 7.3.

Six pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric femurs were mounted in blocks according to ISO guidelines in single leg stance setup. Five strain gauges were attached around the neck of the femur and then prepared according to routine operative techniques to accept the femoral prosthesis. Cortical strains were measured during insertion of the prosthesis with an instrumented mallet attached to an accelerometer. Subsequently, force-displacement readings were taken during cyclical loading on a servo-hydraulic machine and finally the stems were tested to failure.

Our results showed significantly less strain during cyclical loading of the stem with increased surface roughness (p < 0.05). They also showed no significant differences loads/strains during impaction (p = 0.159), no significant difference in micromotion (p = 0.148) and no significant difference in load-to-failure (p = 0.37).


*Email: