Abstract
Background
Recent studies indicate the benefits of total hip arthroplasty (THA) by using femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants (March et al 1999). These benefits rely on the preservation of native hip structure and improved physiological loading.
However, further investigation is needed to compare the outcome of these implants versus the conventional neck-sacrificing stems particularly assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we have investigated the differences in PROs between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.). We hypothesized higher PROs outcome in patients who received treatment by using neck-preserving implants.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the pre and post-operative PROs of patients receiving THA treatment by using neck-sacrificing implant (n=90, age 57±7.9 years) and a matched (BMI, age) cohort group of neck-preserving patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years). Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) were using with the follow-up of similar follow up of 412.76 ± 206.98 days (neck sacrificing implant) and 454.63 ± 226.99 days (Neck-Preserving).
Multivariate analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney tests were conducted for statistical analyses. Holm-Bonferroni adjusted for multiple comparisons was used with initial significance level of 0.05.
Results
Both implants resulted in significant improvement of HOOS Subscores (p<0.001). There was a significant effect of time- surgery interaction (p=0.02). Follow-up HOOS subscores analysis indicated that patients who were treated with neck- preserving stems reported significantly higher Symptoms (p<0.001), Pain (p<0.001), ADL (p=0.011), Sports and Recreation (p=0.011), & QOL (p=0.007) subscores.
Conclusion
This study aimed to investigate the short term to medium term outcome of neck-preserving implants. The superior outcome of neck-preserving femoral stems could be a result of more natural physiological loading in femoral cavity and higher retention of bone tissue in femoral neck area. However, further studies are needed to investigate the longer-term outcome of these implants.
