Aims. National hip fracture registries audit similar aspects of care but there is variation in the actual data collected; these differences restrict international comparison, benchmarking, and research. The Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) published a revised minimum common dataset (MCD) in 2022 to improve consistency and interoperability. Our aim was to assess compatibility of existing registries with the MCD. Methods. We compared 17 hip fracture registries covering 20 countries (Argentina; Australia and New Zealand; China; Denmark; England, Wales, and Northern Ireland; Germany; Holland; Ireland; Japan; Mexico; Norway; Pakistan; the Philippines; Scotland; South Korea; Spain; and Sweden), setting each of these against the 20 core and 12 optional fields of the MCD. Results. The highest MCD adherence was demonstrated by the most recently established registries. The first-generation registries in Scandinavia collect data for 60% of MCD fields, second-generation registries (UK, other European, and Australia and New Zealand) collect for 75%, and third-generation registries collect data for 85% of MCD fields. Five of the 20 core fields were collected by all 17 registries (age; sex; surgery date/time of operation; surgery type; and death during acute admission). Two fields were collected by most (16/17; 94%) registries (date/time of presentation and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade), and five more by the majority (15/17; 88%) registries (type, side, and pathological nature of fracture; anaesthetic modality; and discharge destination). Three core fields were each collected by only 11/17 (65%) registries: prefracture mobility/activities of daily living; cognition on admission; and bone protection medication prescription. Conclusion. There is moderate but improving compatibility between existing registries and the FFN MCD, and its introduction in 2022 was associated with an improved level of adherence among the most recently established programmes. Greater interoperability could be facilitated by improving consistency of data collection relating to prefracture function, cognition, bone protection, and follow-up duration, and this could improve international collaborative benchmarking, research, and quality improvement. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(9):1013–1019

Aims. The aim of this study was to explore current use of the Global Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Minimum Common Dataset (MCD) within established national hip fracture registries, and to propose a revised MCD to enable international benchmarking for hip fracture care. Methods. We compared all ten established national hip fracture registries: England, Wales, and Northern Ireland; Scotland; Australia and New Zealand; Republic of Ireland; Germany; the Netherlands; Sweden; Norway; Denmark; and Spain. We tabulated all questions included in each registry, and cross-referenced them against the 32 questions of the MCD dataset. Having identified those questions consistently used in the majority of national audits, and which additional fields were used less commonly, we then used consensus methods to establish a revised MCD. Results. A total of 215 unique questions were used across the ten registries. Only 72 (34%) were used in more than one national audit, and only 32 (15%) by more than half of audits. Only one registry used all 32 questions from the 2014 MCD, and five questions were only collected by a single registry. Only 21 of the 32 questions in the MCD were used in the majority of national audits. Only three fields (anaesthetic grade, operation, and date/time of surgery) were used by all ten established audits. We presented these findings at the Asia-Pacific FFN meeting, and used an online questionnaire to capture feedback from expert clinicians from different countries. A draft revision of the MCD was then presented to all 95 nations represented at the Global FFN conference in September 2021, with online feedback again used to finalize the revised MCD. Conclusion. The revised MCD will help aspirant nations establish new registry programmes, facilitate the integration of novel analytic techniques and greater multinational collaboration, and serve as an internationally-accepted standard for monitoring and improving hip fracture services. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):721–728

Aims. Most patients with advanced malignancy suffer bone metastases, which pose a significant challenge to orthopaedic services and burden to the health economy. This study aimed to assess adherence to the British Orthopaedic Oncology Society (BOOS)/British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines on patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) in the UK. Methods. A prospective, multicentre, national collaborative audit was designed and delivered by a trainee-led collaborative group. Data were collected over three months (1 April 2021 to 30 June 2021) for all patients presenting with MBD. A data collection tool allowed investigators at each hospital to compare practice against guidelines. Data were collated and analyzed centrally to quantify compliance from 84 hospitals in the UK for a total of 1,137 patients who were eligible for inclusion. Results. A total of 846 patients with pelvic and appendicular MBD were analyzed, after excluding those with only spinal metastatic disease. A designated MBD lead was not present in 39% of centres (33/84). Adequate radiographs were not performed in 19% of patients (160/846), and 29% (247/846) did not have an up-to-date CT of thorax, abdomen, and pelvis to stage their disease. Compliance was low obtaining an oncological opinion (69%; 584/846) and prognosis estimations (38%; 223/846). Surgery was performed in 38% of patients (319/846), with the rates of up-to-date radiological investigations and oncology input with prognosis below the expected standard. Of the 25% (215/846) presenting with a solitary metastasis, a tertiary opinion from a MBD centre and biopsy was sought in 60% (130/215). Conclusion. Current practice in the UK does not comply with national guidelines, especially regarding investigations prior to surgery and for patients with solitary metastases. This study highlights the need for investment and improvement in care. The recent publication of British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) defines auditable standards to drive these improvements for this vulnerable patient group. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(10):1115–1122

Aims. Hand trauma, consisting of injuries to both the hand and the wrist, are a common injury seen worldwide. The global age-standardized incidence of hand trauma exceeds 179 per 100,000. Hand trauma may require surgical management and therefore result in significant costs to both healthcare systems and society. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common following all surgical interventions, and within hand surgery the risk of SSI is at least 5%. SSI following hand trauma surgery results in significant costs to healthcare systems with estimations of over £450 per patient. The World Health Organization (WHO) have produced international guidelines to help prevent SSIs. However, it is unclear what variability exists in the adherence to these guidelines within hand trauma. The aim is to assess compliance to the WHO global guidelines in prevention of SSI in hand trauma. Methods. This will be an international, multicentre audit comparing antimicrobial practices in hand trauma to the standards outlined by WHO. Through the Reconstructive Surgery Trials Network (RSTN), hand surgeons across the globe will be invited to participate in the study. Consultant surgeons/associate specialists managing hand trauma and members of the multidisciplinary team will be identified at participating sites. Teams will be asked to collect data prospectively on a minimum of 20 consecutive patients. The audit will run for eight months. Data collected will include injury details, initial management, hand trauma team management, operation details, postoperative care, and antimicrobial techniques used throughout. Adherence to WHO global guidelines for SSI will be summarized using descriptive statistics across each criteria. Discussion. The Hand and Wrist trauma: Antimicrobials and Infection Audit of Clinical Practice (HAWAII ACP) will provide an understanding of the current antimicrobial practice in hand trauma surgery. This will then provide a basis to guide further research in the field. The findings of this study will be disseminated via conference presentations and a peer-reviewed publication. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):361–366

Aims. Current levels of hip fracture morbidity contribute greatly to the overall burden on health and social care services. Given the anticipated ageing of the population over the coming decade, there is potential for this burden to increase further, although the exact scale of impact has not been identified in contemporary literature. We therefore set out to predict the future incidence of hip fracture and help inform appropriate service provision to maintain an adequate standard of care. Methods. Historical data from the Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (2017 to 2021) were used to identify monthly incidence rates. Established time series forecasting techniques (Exponential Smoothing and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) were then used to predict the annual number of hip fractures from 2022 to 2029, including adjustment for predicted changes in national population demographics. Predicted differences in service-level outcomes (length of stay and discharge destination) were analyzed, including the associated financial cost of any changes. Results. Between 2017 and 2021, the number of annual hip fractures increased from 6,675 to 7,797 (15%), with a rise in incidence from 313 to 350 per 100,000 (11%) for the at-risk population. By 2029, a combined average projection forecast the annual number of hip fractures at 10,311, with an incidence rate of 463 per 100,000, representing a 32% increase from 2021. Based upon these projections, assuming discharge rates remain constant, the total overall length of hospital stay following hip fracture in Scotland will increase by 60,699 days per annum, incurring an additional cost of at least £25 million per year. Approximately five more acute hip fracture beds may be required per hospital to accommodate this increased activity. Conclusion. Projection modelling demonstrates that hip fracture burden and incidence will increase substantially by 2029, driven by an ageing population, with substantial implications for health and social care services. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(1):62–68

Aims. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery during the global pandemic. Secondary objectives were to determine if there was a change in infection and complication profile with changes introduced in practice. Methods. This UK-based multicentre retrospective national audit studied foot and ankle patients who underwent surgery between 13 January and 31 July 2020, examining time periods pre-UK national lockdown, during lockdown (23 March to 11 May 2020), and post-lockdown. All adult patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in an operating theatre during the study period were included. A total of 43 centres in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland participated. Variables recorded included demographic data, surgical data, comorbidity data, COVID-19 and mortality rates, complications, and infection rates. Results. A total of 6,644 patients were included. Of the operated patients, 0.52% (n = 35) contracted COVID-19. The overall all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 0.41%, however in patients who contracted COVID-19, the mortality rate was 25.71% (n = 9); this was significantly higher for patients undergoing diabetic foot surgery (75%, n = 3 deaths). Matching for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and comorbidities, the odds ratio of mortality with COVID-19 infection was 11.71 (95% confidence interval 1.55 to 88.74; p = 0.017). There were no differences in surgical complications or infection rates prior to or after lockdown, and among patients with and without COVID-19 infection. After lockdown the COVID-19 infection rate was 0.15% and no patient died of COVID-19. Conclusion. COVID-19 infection was rare in foot and ankle patients even at the peak of lockdown. However, there was a significant mortality rate in those who contracted COVID-19. Overall surgical complications and postoperative infection rates remained unchanged during the period of this audit. Patients and treating medical personnel should be aware of the risks to enable informed decisions. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2021;2(4):216–226

Background. BANDAIDE aka Back and Neck Discomfort relief with Altered behaviour, Intelligent Postures, Dynamic movement and Exercises (ISBN - 0995676933) is a concise self-help booklet containing strengthening exercises and illustrated information to enable patients self-manage their back and neck pain. The aim of this preliminary audit was to determine patient opinion on BANDAIDE. Institutional audit approval was obtained – No. 8429. Methods and Results. BANDAIDE was distributed to 40 patients, who were asked to evaluate the booklet using the Usefulness Scale for Patient Information Material (USE). USE consists of nine positive statements which are subdivided into three sub-domains; cognition, emotional and behavioural. The cognition sub-domain assesses the knowledge obtained from the material, the emotional sub-domain evaluates the effects of the material on an individual's ability to cope with the illness and the behavioural sub-domain assesses ability to self-manage. Responders were required to rate the extent to which they agreed with each of the nine statements on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 denotes ‘completely disagree’ and 10 denotes ‘completely agree’. Each subsection is on a scale of 0–30, with a higher score suggesting better usefulness. 23 participants provided their opinions of BANDAIDE through the USE. For the three sub-domains, the mean ratings for cognition, emotional and behavioural were 27.2, 24.7, and 26.4 respectively. Conclusions. This preliminary audit suggests that BANDAIDE provides coherent advice that enables a patient to self-manage their back and neck pain. Nevertheless, the opinions of a larger cohort should be pursued to obtain more robust conclusions. Conflict of Interest: George Ampat sells the BANDAIDE booklet online through Amazon and other platforms. S Rhodes and J Sims are employed by Talita Cumi Ltd, of which Bandaide is a trading name. Shantanu Kundu is a medical student and has no conflict of interest. Sources of funding: No funding was obtained

Aims. The purpose of this study was to determine the weightbearing practice of operatively managed fragility fractures in the setting of publically funded health services in the UK and Ireland. Methods. The Fragility Fracture Postoperative Mobilisation (FFPOM) multicentre audit included all patients aged 60 years and older undergoing surgery for a fragility fracture of the lower limb between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2019, and 1 February 2021 and 14 March 2021. Fractures arising from high-energy transfer trauma, patients with multiple injuries, and those associated with metastatic deposits or infection were excluded. We analyzed this patient cohort to determine adherence to the British Orthopaedic Association Standard, “all surgery in the frail patient should be performed to allow full weight-bearing for activities required for daily living”. Results. A total of 19,557 patients (mean age 82 years (SD 9), 16,241 having a hip fracture) were included. Overall, 16,614 patients (85.0%) were instructed to perform weightbearing where required for daily living immediately postoperatively (15,543 (95.7%) hip fracture and 1,071 (32.3%) non-hip fracture patients). The median length of stay was 12.2 days (interquartile range (IQR) 7.9 to 20.0) (12.6 days (IQR 8.2 to 20.4) for hip fracture and 10.3 days (IQR 5.5 to 18.7) for non-hip fracture patients). Conclusion. Non-hip fracture patients experienced more postoperative weightbearing restrictions, although they had a shorter hospital stay. Patients sustaining fractures of the shaft and distal femur had a longer median length of stay than demographically similar patients who received hip fracture surgery. We have shown a significant disparity in weightbearing restrictions placed on patients with fragility fractures, despite the publication of a national guideline. Surgeons intentionally restrict postoperative weightbearing in the majority of non-hip fractures, yet are content with unrestricted weightbearing following operations for hip fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):972–979

The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) is a clinically led web based audit used to inform national policy guidelines. The aim of this audit was to establish the accuracy of completion of NHFD v13.0 theatre collection sheets, identify common pitfalls and areas of good practice, whilst raising awareness of the importance of accuracy of this data and the manner in which it reflects performance of CAH Trauma & Orthopaedic unit in relation to national guidelines. Our aim was to improve completion up to >80% by the operating surgeon and improve overall accuracy. The methodology within both cycles of the audit were identical. It involved reviewing the NHFD V13.0 completed by the operating surgeon and cross-checking their accuracy against clinical notes, operation notes, imaging, anaesthetic charts and A&E admission assessment. Following completion of cycle 1 these results were presented, and education surrounding V13.0 was provided, at the monthly trust audit meeting. At this point we introduced a sticker onto the pre-operative checklist for Hip fractures. This included time of admission and reason for delay. We then completed a re-audit. Cycle-1 included 25 operations, 56% (n=14) had a completed V13.0 form. Of these 21% (n=3) were deemed to be 100% accurate. Cycle-2 included 31 operations (between April – June 21) 81% (n=25) had a completed intra-operative from and showed an increase in accuracy to 56% (n=14). Through raising awareness, education and our interventions we have seen a significant improvement in the completion and accuracy of v13.0. Although 100% accuracy was not achieved its clear that education and intervention will improve compliance over time. Through the interventions that we have implemented we have shown that it is possible to improve completion and accuracy of the NHFD V13.0 theatre collection sheet locally and feel this could be implemented nationally

Introduction. VTE is a possible complication of foot and ankle surgery, however there is an absence of agreement on contributing risk factors in the development of VTE. The primary outcome of this study was to analyse the 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE following foot and ankle surgery and to determine which factors may increase the risk of VTE. Methods. This was a national, multi-centre prospective audit spanning a collection duration of 9 months (2022/2023). Primary outcomes included incidence of symptomatic VTE and VTE related mortality up to 90 days following foot and ankle surgery and Achilles tendon rupture, and analysis of risk factors. Results. In total 11,363 patients were available for analysis. 5,090 patients (44.79%) were elective procedures, 4,791 patients (42.16%) were trauma procedures (excluding Achilles ruptures), 398 patients (3.50%) were acute diabetic procedures, 277 patients (2.44%) were Achilles ruptures undergoing surgery and 807 patients (7.10%) were Achilles ruptures treated non-operatively. There were 99 cases of VTE within 90 days of admission across the whole group (Total incidence = 0.87%), with 3 cases of VTE related mortality (0.03%). On univariate analysis, increased age and ASA grade showedhigher odds of 90-day VTE, as did previous cancer, stroke, history of VTE, and type of foot and ankle procedure / injury (p<0.05). However, on multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors for 90-day VTE were found to be the type of foot and ankle procedure (Achilles tendon rupture = Odd's Ratio 11.62, operative to 14.41, non-operative) and ASA grade (grade III/IV = Odd's Ratio 3.64). Conclusion. The incidence of 90-day post procedure VTE in foot and ankle surgery in this national audit was low. Significant, independent risk factors associated with the development of 90-day symptomatic VTE were Achilles tendon rupture management and high ASA grade

Objectives. The primary aim was to determine the differences in COVID-19 infection rate and 30 day mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery between different treatment pathways over the two phases of the UK-FALCON audit, spanning the first and second national lockdowns. Design. Multicentre retrospective national audit. Setting. This was a combined retrospective (Phase 1) and prospective (Phase 2) national audit of foot and ankle procedures in the UK in 2020. Participants. All adult patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in an operating theatre during the study period included from 46 participating centres in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Patients were categorised as either a green pathway (designated COVID-19 free) or blue pathway. Results. 10,846 patients were included, 6,644 from phase 1 and 4,202 from phase 2. Over the 2 phases the infection rate on a blue pathway was 1.07% (69/6,470) and 0.21% on a green pathway (9/4,280). In phase 1, there was no significant difference in the COVID-19 perioperative infection rate between the blue and green pathways in any element of the first phase (pre-lockdown (p = .109), lockdown (p = .923) or post-lockdown (p = .577)). However, in phase 2 there was a significant reduction in perioperative infection rate when using the green pathway in both the pre-lockdown (p < .001) and lockdown periods (p < .001). There was no significant difference in COVID-19 related mortality between pathways. Conclusions. There was a five-fold reduction in the perioperative COVID-19 infection rate when using designated COVID-19 green pathways; however the success of the pathways only became significant in phase 2 of the study. The study shows a developing success in using green pathways in reducing the risk to patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery

In 2007, the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) was conceived in the United Kingdom (UK) as a national audit aiming to improve hip fracture care across the country. It now represents the world's largest hip fracture registry. The purpose of the NHFD is to evaluate aspects of best practice for hip fracture care, at an institutional level, that reflect the evidence-based clinical guidelines and quality standards developed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. No national program currently exists, equivalent to the NHFD, in Canada despite evidence suggesting that national audit programs can significantly improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate aspects of best practice for hip fractures at our Canadian academic tertiary referral center using the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and benchmarks used by the NHFD. In doing so, we aimed to compare our performance to other hospitals contributing to the NHFD database. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients who presented to our Canadian center for surgical management of a hip fracture between August 2019 to September 2020. Fracture types included intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, and femoral neck fractures treated with either surgical fixation or arthroplasty. Cases were identified from the affiliate institute's Operatively Repaired Fractures Database (ORFD). The ORFD prospectively collects patient-level data extracted from electronic medical records, operating room information systems, and from patients’ discharge summaries. All applicable data from our database were compared to the established KPI and benchmarks published by the NHFD that apply to the Canadian healthcare system. Six hundred and seven patients’ data (64.5% female) were extracted from the ORFD, mean age 80.4 ± 13.3 years. The NHFD contains data from 63,284 patients across the entire UK. The affiliate institute performed inferiorly compared to the NHFD for two KPIs: prompt surgery (surgery by the day following presentation with hip fracture, 52.8% vs. 69%) and prompt mobilization after surgery (mobilized out of bed by the day after operation, 43.0% vs. 81.0%). However, more patients at the affiliate institute were not delirious when tested postoperatively (89.6% vs. 68.4%). There was no significant difference in the average length of stay (12.23 days versus 13.5 days) or in 30-day mortality rate (8.4% versus 8.3%). More than half of all KPI's and benchmarks for patients receiving a hip fracture surgery at our tertiary referral center in Canada ranked significantly lower than patients receiving a hip fracture surgery in the UK. These findings indicate that perhaps a national audit program should be implemented in Canada to improve aspects of hip fracture care, at an institutional level. Following evidence-based clinical guidelines and using standardized benchmarks would encourage change and foster improvement across Canadian centres when necessary

To evaluate the performance of this institution in its delivery of care to elderly patients with a hip fracture over an 11-year period and to establish recommendations to improve practice. Regular prospective audits of a cohort of 50 patients have been undertaken between 1990 and 2000. A larger and more comprehensive retrospective audit of 100 patients was performed in 2001. Goals were set regarding time to admission, time to surgery and to discharge in close accordance with the best practice guidelines devised by the Royal College of Physicians in 1989. There has been an alarming decline in standards in key areas. Time from A& E to admission: at best 78% of patients within 3 hours, 4% in 2001. Time from admission to surgery: at best 89% within 24 hours, 31% in 2001. Persistence of significant morbidity for patients delayed to surgery for non-medical reasons: 65% of these patients developed a post operative complication and 20% died within 30 days of admission. Delay to discharge: at best 13 acute bed days, now 18 (2001). Current practice is less than ideal. Clinical governance involves a dual responsibility – of the clinician to maintain high standards and of the management to provide adequate resources. Both need addressing to reverse the current trend

Objective. Guidelines published by the British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) and Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) recommend urgent MRI imaging and intervention in individuals suspected of having CES. The need for an evidence based protocol is driven by a lack of 24/7 MRI services and centralisation of neurosurgery to tertiary centres, compounded by CES's significant medico-legal implications. We conducted an audit to evaluate the pathway for suspected CES in BCUHB West between 2018 and 2021. Methods. A retrospective audit of patients managed for suspected CES between 01/11/2018 and 01/05/2021 was performed, using the SBNS/BASS guidelines as the standard. Results. A total of 252 patients received an emergency MRI for suspected CES between 2018 and 2021. 99% of patients were scanned in compliance with SBNS/BASS standards. Radiological evidence of CES was found in 18% of patients. 33% of emergency scans were performed by out-of-hours services. 4% of patients had repeated scans within the same 6-month period. The majority of referrals originated from Orthopaedics surgeons (78%), or staff in the Emergency Department (8%). 92% of ambulatory patients were not admitted to hospital. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, referrals increased from 2.5 to 3.5 per week. Conclusion. SBNS/BASS standards were largely met, avoiding life changing disability and medico-legal consequences. The department should continue to follow SBNS/BASS guidance on the management of individuals with suspected CES. Challenges regarding the use of repeated scans should be addressed to avoid unnecessary costs. Introduction of new early recognition guidelines and Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) has likely driven an increase in suspected CES referrals, and subsequent MRI demand. This audit should be utilised as an ongoing tool to ensure best practice continues, and to implement simple measures which may improve compliance with the pathway

Objectives. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery during the global pandemic. Secondary objectives were to determine if there was a change in infection and complication profile with changes introduced in practice. Design. Multicentre retrospective national audit. Setting. UK-based study on foot and ankle patients who underwent surgery between the 13. th. January to 31. st. July 2020 – examining time periods pre- UK national lockdown, during lockdown (23. rd. March to 11. th. May 2020) and post-lockdown. Participants. All adult patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in an operating theatre during the study period included from 43 participating centres in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Main Outcome Measures. Variables recorded included demographics, surgical data, comorbidity data, COVID-19 and mortality rates, complications, and infection rates. Results. 6644 patients were included. In total 0.52% of operated patients contracted COVID-19 (n=35). The overall all cause 30-day mortality rate was 0.41%, however in patients who contracted COVID-19, the mortality rate was 25.71% (n=9); this was significantly higher for patients undergoing diabetic foot surgery (75%, n=3 deaths). Matching for age, ASA and comorbidities, the OR of mortality with COVID-19 infection was 11.71 (95% CI 1.55 to 88.74, p=0.017). There were no differences in surgical complications or infection rates prior to or after lockdown, and amongst patients with and without COVID-19 infection. After lockdown COVID-19 infection rate was 0.15% and no patient died of COVID-19 infection. Conclusions. COVID-19 infection was rare in foot and ankle patients even at the peak of lockdown. However, there was a significant mortality rate in those who contracted COVID-19. Overall surgical complications and post-operative infection rates remained unchanged during the period of this audit. Patients and treating medical personnel should be aware of the risks to enable informed decisions

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are very common injuries. National recommendations (British Orthopaedic Association, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)) exist in the UK to guide the management of these injuries. These guidelines provide recommendations about several aspects of care including which type of injuries to treat non-operatively and surgically, timing of surgery and routine follow-up. In particular, current recommendations include considering immobilizing patients for 4 weeks in plaster for those managed conservatively, and operating on fractures within 72 hours for intra-articular injuries and 7 days for extra-articular fractures. With increased demands for services and an ageing population, prompt surgery for those presenting with distal radius fractures is not always possible. A key factor is the need for prompt surgery for hip fracture patients. This study is an audit of the current standard of care at a busy level 2 trauma unit against national guidelines for the management of DRFs. This retrospective audit includes all patients presenting to our emergency department from June to September 2018. Patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of a closed distal radius fracture and follow-up in our department were included in the study. Those with open fractures were excluded. Data was retrieved from clinical coding, electronic patient records, and IMPAX Client (Picture archiving and communication system). The following data was collected on patients treated conservatively and those managed surgically:- (1)Time to surgery for surgical management; (2)Period of immobilization for both conservative and operative groups. 45 patients (13 male, 32 female) with 49 distal radius fractures (2 patients had bilateral injuries) were included. Patients had mean age 63 years (range 19 to 92 years) 30 wrists were treated non-operatively and 19 wrists treated surgically (8 K-wires, 10 ORIF, 1 MUA). Mean time to surgery in the operative group was 8 days (range 1 – 21 days, median 7 days). Mean time to surgery for intra-articular fractures was 7 days (range 1 – 21) and 12 days for extra-articular fractures (range 4 – 20). Mean immobilization period in those treated in plaster is 6 weeks (range 4 – 13 weeks, median 5.6 weeks). At busy level 2 trauma units with limited theatre capacity and a high volume of hip fracture admissions, time to surgery for less urgent injuries such as wrist fractures is often delayed. National guidelines are useful in helping to guide management however their standards are often difficult to achieve in the context of increasing populations in urban areas and an ageing population

There is high morbidity and mortality associated with infection following orthopaedic procedures. In accordance to local guidelines, most hospitals follow a set protocol for surgical prophylaxis, which expects a compliance rate of 100%. A new protocol was introduced to the orthopaedic department of a teaching hospital in August 2013, changing from a cephalosporin, with potential C. difficile risk, to teicoplanin and gentamicin, within 30 minutes of incision. Our aim was to audit how well the protocol was followed across 3 different time periods. Data was collected for 3 different time periods following the introduction of the new protocol (August-November 2013, April-May 2014 & November 2014) on the choice of antibiotic. Both elective and trauma cases were included. After each cycle, the data was presented to the orthopaedic surgical and anaesthetic departments to raise awareness and draw attention to the antibiotic prophylaxis posters in theatre. The 1st audit cycle (n=30) indicated that there was 0% compliance with the current protocol and 100% compliance with the previous protocol. The 2nd audit cycle (n=27) indicated that 0% complied with the current protocol, 54% complied with the previous protocol and that there was a combination of both protocols being used in 46% of the patients. Finally the 3rd audit cycle (n=33) indicated a 100% compliance rate in terms of antibiotic choice. However, only 9% were given the appropriate dose according to body weight and within the appropriate time based on the documented evidence. This audit demonstrates the value of auditing and then disseminating the findings to relevant departments to influence practice. Each audit cycle demonstrated a progressive uptake in compliance with the hospital trust's antibiotic prophylaxis policy. The last audit cycle highlighted discrepancy in dosage based on weights; a further intervention will be to provide ideal body weight (IBW) vs dose tables in all orthopaedic theatres to ensure the correct antibiotic dosage is given

Audit is an important part of surgical practice. Commissioners may use it as evidence of quality assurance. No comprehensive audit exists in spinal surgery. Usage of existing databases is disappointing. We developed an audit database which was comprehensive and gathered patient outcomes. The underlying principles were:. All patients having surgery should enter,. Duplicate data entry should be avoided. No effort should be required of the participating surgeons. Demographic data, OPCS codes, length of stay and other data were downloaded directly from the hospital information systems. A monthly printout of patients enrolled was provided to the audit coordinator. She was responsible for the collection of clinical outcomes at 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years after surgery. The initial audit involved the Northwest and Mersey Regions. Data from the hospital information systems (HIS) for two years were available for comparison. Unfortunately only two centres gathered clinical outcomes. We have continued to gather data. 380 patients have been enrolled. HIS data are available for all. With varying lengths of follow up, there are 1045 potential clinical outcomes available. Only 8 patients (2%; 8 outcomes, 0.76%) have been lost to follow up. Using this data we are able to compare outcomes between surgeons, between surgical procedures, and see changes over time. As far as we know we are the only centre in the UK able to do this. It is a valuable Clinical Governance tool. We believe that the principles underlying this audit are the only means to obtain comprehensive outcome audit in surgery

Abstract. Background. University Hospital of Wales (UHW) went live as a Major Trauma Centre (MTC) on the 14th September 2020. New guidelines have been set up by the Wales Trauma Network. Aim. Prospective audit to see how many admissions, correct pathways were followed?. Materials & Methods. Prospective data collection prospective over a period of 3 months: starting from 8.11.2020 to 31.01.2021. Results. Spinal admissions represent around 22% of MTC admissions. The closing loop showed higher amount of admission (45 in comparison with the first audit 28). 42 patients had fractures where three had cord syndromes. 13 patients out of the 45 (29%) were managed operatively. After changing to MTC, more indirect referral from other hospitals representing 64% of total admission with one wrong referral (2.2%) that came to the MTC and could have been managed locally. On the other hand, repatriation rate has improved from 61% to 84%, however, repatriation time was longer than expected with >1 week represents 78%. Conclusions. Changing to MTC had a great impact with increased work load in the trust. Repatriation would be aimed for within 72 hours from treatment either conservative or postoperative. More attention should be paid towards the appropriate referral pathways to avoid wrong referral

Background. Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a spinal condition requiring emergency spinal surgery once diagnosed. The patient-reported symptoms are often subtle and none have been shown to be sensitive or specific in confirming CES. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) is the diagnostic gold standard, and guidelines recommend MRI access within 24-hours of symptom presentation. Limited sequence MRI scans (sagittal T2 sequences of the whole spine) have been shown to successfully identify patients with scan-positive CES despite reducing the duration of an MRI. The aim of this audit was to examine utilisation of same-day MRI requests by spinal practitioners from a newly operational same-day emergency care spinal unit over the two-year period. Methods and results. Data was routinely collected over the two-year period and retrospectively reviewed. Data extraction occurred for cases of suspected CES with a same-day scan. Data extraction included type of MRI scan (lumbar/ whole spine/ CES protocol); outcome (admission/ discharge); final diagnosis. After clinical examination, only 258 (24% of 1085) suspected CES cases were identified and scanned within 24 hours, 58% (n=149) of which were with CES limited sequence scans. Only 12% (n=30) demonstrated scan- positive CES resulting in surgery within 24-hours. MRI same-day requests increased between 2020 (n=81, 21%) and 2021 (n=177, 26%), although utilisation of limited sequence scans improved (n=39, 48% in 2020; n=109, 62% in 2021). Conclusion. Limited sequence MRI scans are a time- and cost-saving means of providing screening for those with suspected CES. Improved utility was demonstrated over the 2-year period by the spinal practitioners. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No sources of funding

Introduction: Ankle diastasis injury occurs in up to 20% of ankle fractures. Various techniques have been used to treat syndesmosis injuries, but controversy remains and outcome is variable. In light of some recent cases of substandard syndesmosis fixations requiring revision, an audit of our results was undertaken. Method: Study type: Retrospective audit of radiographs and patient records. Data collection: patients were selected using an orthopaedic database search for operations coded as distal tib/fib ORIF or ankle ORIF. Study period: 12 months, July 2008 to July 2009 (currently data has been analyzed on the first 6 months only, the remaining 6 months will follow). Audit questions to be answered: How is ankle diastasis injury being managed? Are we reducing syndesmosis correctly? Should there be a revision to local policy?. Audit standard: Syndesmoses should be adequately reduced and fixation techniques employed should be in accordance with recommendations in standard Orthopaedic reference texts (Rockwood & Green, AO fixation manual 3). Results: 76 ankle ORIFs in July to December 2008 inclusive. Out of these, 16 had diastasis fixation (21%). 2 of the patients had a syndesmosis width over 6 mm indicating an inadequate reduction of the syndesmosis 1. Both of these required revision surgery. In total 70% of the post operative x-rays showed inadequate syndesmosis fixation or reduction. Discussion: The single most predictive indicator of a favourable function is accurate reduction of the syndesmosis 2. Substandard fixations are associated with poor long term outcomes. This raises the potential for litigation and the requirement for education and policy change. We have produced policy guidelines for theatre and circulated the information to all surgeons. A further audit will be carried out to assess the effectiveness of this in 6 months time. (The data will be available from this re-audit for presentation at the conference.)

The ankle radiograph is a commonly requested investigation as the ankle joint is commonly injured. Each radiograph exposes 0.01 mSv of radiation to the patient that is equivalent to 1.5 days of natural background radiation [1]. The aim of the clinical audit was to use the Ottawa Ankle Rule to attempt to reduce the number of ankle radiographs taken in patients with acute ankle injuries and hence reduce the dose of ionising radiation the patient receives. A retrospective audit was undertaken. 123 ankle radiograph requests and radiographs taken between May and July 2018 were evaluated. Each ankle radiograph request including patient history and clinical examination was graded against the Ottawa Ankle Rule. The rule states that 1 point(s) indicates radiograph series; (1) malleolar and/or midfoot pain; (1) tenderness over the posterior 6cm or tip of the lateral or medial malleolus (ankle); (1) tenderness over the navicular or the base of the fifth metatarsal (foot); (1) unable to take four steps both immediately and in the emergency department [2]. Patients who score 0 do not need radiograph series. Each radiograph was reviewed if a fracture was present or not. The clinical audit identified 14 true positives where the Ottawa Ankle Rule scored 1 and the patient had an ankle fracture, and 2 false negatives (sensitivity 88%). There were 81 false positives, and 23 true negatives (specificity 22%). Therefore, a total of 23/123 ankle radiographs were unnecessary which is equivalent to 34.5 days of background radiation. The negative predictive value of the Ottawa Ankle Rule in this audit was 92%. The low rate of Ottawa rule utilisation may unnecessarily cause patient harm that should be addressed. An educational intervention with physicians combined with integration of the Ottawa rule scoring in ankle radiograph requests is planned with re-audit in 6 months

The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit started in four hospitals in 1993. To date, all except two, hospitals doing hip fractures have been involved in the audit. Participation has been intermittent due to a lack of funds to pay for the audit staff. Nonetheless there are now 19,000 patients recorded on the database. This allows individual hospitals to compare their workload over time and to compare local data with national comparators. Unfortunately many of the outcome parameters involve soft end points such as the delay in operation or the proportion of patients who are sent for formal rehabilitation. Much of the data has simply confirmed what surgeons have always suspected. The injury is becoming more common, the patients are getting older and the patients are becoming less fit. Co-morbidities are frequent and the strongest predictor of mortality is the age of the patient at presentation. What the audit has done from a surgeon’s viewpoint is to define the general lack of resources devoted to this injury and to provide evidence which has been used in many hospitals particularly to increase the availability of operating time. Equally as no surprise comes the realisation that surgery is often the least part of the care of these patients. Evidence from the audit has allowed many hospitals to encourage greater participation by geriatricians in the overall care of these patients. The use of the specialist nurse in hip fractures who has responsibility for all aspects of care including follow up has been particularly useful and is recommended in all units. There are however, two huge problems arising from this data. The first, is that the existence of the data means there is something which can be measured and in consequence this has been used as a management tool to measure performance yet where hospitals have been found lacking, resources have not always been made available to improve performance. The second and newer problem relates to the existing anonymity of data. At present the system is very much like critical incident reporting in the airline industry and no surgeon, anaesthetist or hospital is individually identified in any of the published data. The Freedom of Information Act, which has recently come into force in the UK, may now make is possible for anyone to obtain individual named data on both doctors and hospitals. While threatening, this development now seems inevitable but may discourage full participation in future audit. In spite of these concerns individual clinicians remain enthusiastic about the audit and England, Wales and Northern Ireland have shown considerable interest in developing the audit into a UK wide system

Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) is a consultant-led orthopaedic trauma outpatient triage and management service. The use of VFC has recently become commonplace in the United Kingdom. It allows multiple referral sources to the orthopaedic team, with clinical information and imaging reviewed by a consultant in VFC who formulates an appropriate management plan with the patient contacted; either to attend clinic for consultation or discharged with advice over the phone. The VFC is more efficient than a traditionally delivered outpatient fracture clinic service. We have utilized VFC for 1 year at our hospital, East Kent University Hospital Foundation Trust (EKHUFT), and undertook a closed loop audit to evaluate the service and highlight potential areas of improvement. The Objective of the study was to identify whether the implementation of new re-designed VFC referral guidelines together with teaching set across one of the hospitals in EKHUFT improved the effectiveness and standards of VFC referrals. An initial audit was performed of all referrals made to VFC over a 2 weeks period in December 2018. Changes to the VFC referral pathway were implemented, and teaching sessions performed by the orthopaedic team to all referring units, including minor injury units (MIU) and the emergency department (ED). After implementation, re-audit of VFC referrals was performed in February 2019 over a similar 2 weeks period. Patient demographics, diagnosis and outcomes were collected from the online patient record with images reviewed using PACS software. Following intervention, referral rates dropped by 27.7% (136 vs 188 patients) over the 2 weeks periods. Patient demographics, injury type and severity remained the same between the 2 groups. 51.5% (70/136) did not meet VFC pathway criteria after the intervention and were considered inappropriate, compared to 70% in the original group. 15.4% (21/136) referrals could have been managed in the emergency department using the new guidelines and leaflet discharge. 5.1% (7/136) of the referrals should have been referred to orthopaedic on-call acutely and 22% (30/136) of the referrals had a soft tissue injury or no injury identified. This did not change between the 2 groups despite intervention. Referring MIU and ED units require continued support and teaching over a prolonged time period to hopefully see further improvements. Immediate hot reporting of radiographs may further benefit the service, but staffing and funding issues particularly out of hours, means this remains an aspiration

There has been extensive research into neck of femur fractures in the elderly. Fragility non-hip femoral fractures share many of the same challenges [1]. Surgical management is complex, patients are frail and mortality rates have been reported as high as 38% [2]. Despite this, relatively little data is available evaluating the level of MDT care provided to non-hip femoral fractures. This audit aimed to evaluate the standard of MDT care provided for patients with non-hip femoral fractures according to the NHFD key performance indicators. The following fractures were included in the dataset: distal femoral, femoral shaft and peri-prosthetic femoral. Patients under 65 were excluded. Data was retrospectively collected using post-operative and medical documentation. Performance was assessed according to five key performance indicators:. Did orthogeriatrics review the patient within 72-hours?. Was surgery performed within 36-hours?. Was the patient weight bearing post-operatively?. Was a confusion assessment completed?. Was the patient discharged home?. 38 patients met the inclusion criteria. 84% of patients were seen by orthogeriatrics within 72 hours of admission. 32% of patients were operated on within 36-hours of admission, with time to theatre exceeding 36-hours in 92% of peri-prosthetic fractures. 37% of patients were not advised to full weight bear post operatively. 84% of patients received a confusion assessment whilst 61% of patients were discharged to their prior place of living. Our results suggest that non-hip femoral fractures do not receive the same standard of MDT care as neck of femur fractures. Greater prioritisation of resources should be given to this patient subset so that care is equivalent to hip-fracture patients. Time to surgery is a particular area for improvement, particularly in peri-prosthetic fractures, a trend that is mirrored nationally. Greater emphasis should be placed on encouraging full-weight bearing post-operatively to prevent post-surgical complications

Clinical governance encompasses audit. Audit is a requirement of our professional bodies and our hospital trusts. It is not usually resourced adequately and the ability to audit spinal surgical outcomes is haphazard nationally. This presentation describes the results that can be achieved in the absence of formal audit support. A surgical database was started in 1993; its evolution involved the use of standard outcome measures in 1995. Between 1995 and 1999, four hundred and one major spine procedures were undertaken by a single surgeon. The outcome measures were the Oswestry disability index, the low back outcome, MSP MZD and a visual analogue pain scale. Pre-operative data was collected on all 233 elective cases. Follow up was 59% at 6 months, 51% at one year and 57% at 2 years. At two years a Macnab score was available in 106 cases and the results were excellent/ good 81%, fair/poor 19%. There were 56 recorded perioperative complications. 21 occurred in the 77 instrumented procedures and 35 in the 156 non instrumented procedures. The results of this type of audit can only be cautiously compared to published data because of poor follow up. Quality outcome measures and audit probably require a funded resource to be of value

All multidisciplinary audit projects from January 1998 to March 2002 involving an Orthopaedic department were assessed to measure their impact on improving clinical practice. Data were derived from reports formulated by the Trust’s Audit department, which listed findings, conclusions and proposals for each project. Among 41 studies performed, 37 listed a formal proposal of actions. 4 projects had a completed outcome of which 2 closed the loop with re-audit. 9 other projects recommended re-audit but none had been initiated. Although Trusts actively partake in regular audit, it seems more as a service or training commitment, rather than contributing towards improving the quality of healthcare

Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis (SUFE) persists as a source of debate with the majority of surgeons selecting this option in a proportion of patients whom they regard as at increased risk of a subsequent slip. Universal prophylactic pinning was introduced in our region in 2005 after an audit of ten years local practice identified 25% of unilateral cases presented with a subsequent slip. This study reports our experience between 2005 and 2020. In this prospective study, 44 patients presented with 55 affected hips compared with 60 patients with 67 affected hips in the original study. Two patients were excluded as their initial slip had not been treated in our unit. Of the 42 hips seven were bilateral, 34 of the 35 unilateral hips underwent prophylactic pinning. The one exception subsequently underwent prophylactic pinning due to developing pain. Consistent with our original series, at a minimum follow up of 13 months there have been no complications of infection, fracture, chondrolysis or avascular necrosis subsequent to prophylactic pinning. Over 25 years 70 patients have undergone prophylactic pinning without complication. On the premise that 25% of our unpinned hips presented with subsequent slips before instituting our policy we estimate that we have prevented 17 subsequent slips over 25 years including the consequences which can be significant. We continue to advocate universal prophylactic pinning as an effective and safe practice in the management of SUFE

Introduction We performed an audit of tunnel position in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed by two surgeons at a single centre. The audit cycle was opened with a retrospective review of a cohort of patients in order to establish existing surgical practice. Following this review our practice changed with the use of intra-operative image intensifier to confirm tunnel positions. The audit loop was closed with a prospective study of a second cohort of patients undergoing surgery using the new technique. Results Twenty five patients were reviewed in each group. The case-mix for the two groups were similar with regard to age, sex, side, graft selection and surgical technique. The first cohort of patients had optimal tibial tunnel placement in 56% (sagittal) and 88% (coronal) of cases. The femoral tunnel was correctly positioned in the sagittal plane in 52% of patients. The second cohort, in which an intra-operative image-intensifier was used, had optimal tunnel position for the femur in 100% of cases and for the tibia (sagittal) in 48% of patients. Conclusion In this study we have shown that the use of an image intensifier, intra-operatively, greatly improved femoral tunnel position but had no significant effect on tibial tunnel placement. We have also demonstrated that audit is effective in improving clinical practice

Background. National hip fracture programmes are becoming widespread, but this practice is nascent and varied. The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (SHFA) was an early adopter of this strategy and is credited with substantial systemic improvements in quality and outcomes. Objectives. To provide evidence and incentive to clinicians and administrators to adopt successful improvement strategies, and to facilitate data-driven change hip fracture care. Study Design and Methods. We reviewed the practice of seven national hip fracture improvement programmes in: Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Australia, New Zealand, UK, Scotland, and Ireland. We report our experience from the SHFA and describe: the results of our programme; challenges and learning points encountered, and successful strategies for implementing change. Results. There is variance in approach to data collection and reporting, for example: standalone programmes versus combined trauma and arthroplasty registries; annual trend reporting versus ‘snapshot’ or real-time information; population-level versus patient-level data, and the emphasis placed on service-level characteristics. The governance model also varies – some act as a passive data registry whereas others act as active agents of change and regulation. There is consensus on the key performance makers: prompt admission; early surgery and mobilisation, and a multidisciplinary approach. There have been significant challenges encountered by the SHFA with respect to funding, logistical, and political issues. Analysis of the effects of our programme have demonstrated its clinical efficacy, and has identified successful strategies for improvement. We describe this experience. Conclusions. The establishment of national audit programmes has resulted in significant improvements in quality, efficiency, and outcomes. This study of major national programmes provides evidence, incentive, and instruction to clinicians and administrators who seek to improve healthcare systems

Few doctors answer their bleep by stating who they are. Answering the phone in a formal manner is of utmost importance in the hospital setting especially by on-call teams who are normally referred patients by other specialties, general practitioners and in some cases by other hospitals. An audit to evaluate the internal hospital communication was completed. In the first part of this audit, junior doctors within the orthopaedic department at the RAH were bleeped. Doctors were expected to answer by initiating the conversation by stating (1) name, (2) department, (3) grade and (4) a greeting. A list of omissions was recorded. If the call went through switchboard, it was expected that the hospital name was stated. The second part of the audit extended to other specialties in the RAH as well as orthopaedic departments in hospitals within the Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board (NHS GGC). Forty-three bleeps were made to doctors of various grades over a period of two months. Nine bleeps (two from other hospitals) were not answered. Five doctors answered their bleep in full. Only twenty-one doctors stated their name whilst eleven stated their grade. In both instances the department was not necessarily stated. The results were similar between the different departments as well as between the seven hospitals offering an orthopaedic service within NHS GGC. Of the thirteen on-call doctors that were bleeped as an external call through switchboard, only one doctor stated the hospital name. This has implications since most hospitals within NHS GGC share a common switchboard. These results emphasise the need for a protocol within NHS GGC for a standard etiquette for intra and inter hospital communication to ensure that patient safety and confidentiality is safeguarded

Aims

The primary aim was to determine the influence of COVID-19 on 30-day mortality following hip fracture. Secondary aims were to determine predictors of COVID-19 status on presentation and later in the admission; the rate of hospital acquired COVID-19; and the predictive value of negative swabs on admission.

Aims. Supracondylar fractures are the most frequently occurring paediatric fractures about the elbow and may be associated with a neurovascular injury. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma 11 (BOAST 11) guidelines describe best practice for supracondylar fracture management. This study aimed to assess whether emergency departments in the United Kingdom adhere to BOAST 11 standard 1: a documented assessment, performed on presentation, must include the status of the radial pulse, digital capillary refill time, and the individual function of the radial, median (including the anterior interosseous), and ulnar nerves. . Materials and Methods. Stage 1: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective audit of adherence to BOAST 11 standard 1. Data were collected from eight hospitals in the United Kingdom. A total of 433 children with Gartland type 2 or 3 supracondylar fractures were eligible for inclusion. A centrally created data collection sheet was used to guide objective analysis of whether BOAST 11 standard 1 was adhered to. Stage 2: We created a quality improvement proforma for use in emergency departments. This was piloted in one of the hospitals used in the primary audit and was re-audited using equivalent methodology. In all, 102 patients presenting between January 2016 and July 2017 were eligible for inclusion in the re-audit. Results. Stage 1: Of 433 patient notes audited, adherence to BOAST 11 standard 1 was between 201 (46%) and 232 (54%) for the motor and sensory function of the individual nerves specified, 318 (73%) for radial pulse, and 247 (57%) for digital capillary refill time. Stage 2: Of 102 patient notes audited, adherence to BOAST 11 standard 1 improved to between 72 (71%) and 80 (78%) for motor and sensory function of the nerves, to 84 (82%) for radial pulse, and to 82 (80%) for digital capillary refill time. Of the 102 case notes reviewed in stage 2, only 44 (43%) used the quality improvement proforma; when the proforma was used, adherence improved to between 40 (91%) and 43 (98%) throughout. Conclusion. Adherence to BOAST 11 standard 1 is poor in hospitals across the country. This is concerning as neurovascular deficit may be an indication for emergent surgery, and missed neurovascular injury can cause long-term, or even permanent, functional impairment. We present a simple proforma that improves adherence to this standard, can easily be implemented into emergency departments, and may improve patient safety. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:346–51

Background. Both surgeon and hospital volume influence patient outcomes following revision knee arthroplasty. Purpose. To audit all centres performing revision knee procedures in England and Wales over a 2-year period. All centres were audited against two pre-defined standards linked to hospital volume. Operative volume should be greater than 10 revisions per year;. More than 2.5 revisions should be performed for every 100 primary arthroplasties implanted. Methods. Data for 9659 knee revisions performed in 359 different centres between 01/07/08 and 30/06/10 was accessed from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. For each centre information on the volume of primary and revision knee procedures undertaken during this period was available and was used as the basis for audit. Results. During the 2-year study period 396 different centres performed 153133 primary knee arthroplasties. Of these 359 (91%) performed 9659 knee revisions, equivalent to 6.2 revisions for every 100 primary arthroplasties performed. Revision centres included 208 (58%) NHS hospitals performing 8148 revisions, 141 (39%) independent hospitals performing 1258 revisions and 10 (3%) Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTC) performing 253 revisions. The median number of revisions performed per hospital was 7 per year (Range 1 to 144). Volume differed dependent upon hospital type (NHS=14/year vs. Independent=3/year, p< 0.001). Two hundred and twelve (59%) centres performed < 10 revisions per year and thus fell below the audit standard. Eighty of these centres also performed < 2.5 revisions per 100 primaries. Of the 141 independent hospitals 128 (91%) fell below the suggested standards for revision volume. Conclusions. A significant number of institutions are performing only a small volume of knee revision procedures. To ensure safe and sustainable practice with better outcomes, consideration should be given to rationalising the revision service in fewer centres

Introduction: The role of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing the incidence of infection following hip and knee arthroplasty is well established. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) published best practice guidance on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in hip and knee arthroplasty. The guidance stated that all patients should receive prophylactic antibiotics at induction of anaesthesia and that each unit should have a locally agreed policy with advice from microbiologist. The aim of this audit was to compare the practice in our unit with the BOA guidance and implement necessary changes. Patients and Methods: A prospective audit was conducted over a one month period in 2007 and included all patients undergoing elective primary hip and knee replacements. A similar re-audit was conducted over one month period in 2008 after the initial audit recommendations were implemented. Results: Forty patients (40) were included in the initial audit. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics at induction but the choice, dose and duration of administration of antibiotics varied widely among surgeons in the unit. After discussion with the local microbiologist, we recommended a departmental policy for prophylactic antibiotics. The policy recommended a single dose of Cefuroxime and Gentamycin for standard cases and a single dose of Teicoplanin and Gentamycin for high-MRSA risk cases. A re-audit was conducted after the new policy was agreed. The re-audit included 33 patients. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics at induction. The choice of antibiotics was concordant with the policy in 79% of cases and duration of administration was appropriate in 85% of cases. Overall, the policy was adhered to in 22 cases (67 %). Discussion & Conclusions: The closed audit cycle resulted in improvement of our practice but the compliance rate with the new policy was lower than expected. Although it is the primary responsibility of the operating surgeon to ensure the appropriate prophylactic antibiotics are administered, more awareness of other team members is necessary to improve the compliance rate with the new policy

Literature suggests that joint orthopaedic and geriatric care, and geriatric orthopaedic rehabilitation units, would provide best care for fractured neck of femur (NOF) patients. These are often elderly frail patients with concurrent illnesses and co-morbidities who also have a fracture. There is to date no quantitative data. This completed audit quantifies the care provided on the orthopaedic wards in the first phase solely by orthopaedic team, and in the repeat phase with additional regular geriatric input from an orthogeriatric senior house officer (SHO) and consultant geriatrician ward rounds. A retrospective audit of fractured NOF patients admitted to acute orthopaedic wards under orthopaedics and treated operatively. The first phase analysed 72 patients with sole orthopaedic care. The repeat phase analysed 25 patients after the introduction of an orthogeriatric SHO and geriatric ward rounds. The first audit phase of orthopaedic care alone found that 50% of patients were reviewed each day of the first post op seven-day week. The mean number of reviews in the post-op week was three. A total of 58% patients were operated on the next day. A minority never had post-op bloods or x-rays prior to discharge from the acute bed. Ad hoc medical input by referral occurred in 50% of patients. The repeat audit of combined orthogeriatric care found that 75% of patients were reviewed each day in the post-op week. The mean number of reviews in the post-op week rose to five. Similar to the first phase, 59% proceeded to next day surgery with combined care. All patients had timely bloods and x-rays before discharge from the acute bed. Medical input rose to 80% due to regular ward rounds, and ad hoc referrals decreased in quantity whilst increased in quality. Length of stay and mortality were reduced. The clinical risk of fractured NOF patients was reduced on the appointment of an orthogeriatric SHO in combination with formal reviews by consultant geriatrician. Further models of care are being evaluated. This audit adds evidence that joint care is better for these usually elderly and co-morbid patients

Introduction: The use of allogeneic blood is associated with many complications. A baseline audit performed in our institution in 2000 showed that 11% of patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty required post-operative transfusion. Following this audit, patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty were no longer routinely cross matched, a Haemovigilance Nurse was employed in compliance with the National Blood Users Group guidelines, and post-operative cell salvage was introduced for patients with a pre-operative haemoglobin level of less than 12 g/dL. Aim: To assess the impact of these changes on our transfusion practice. Methods and materials A prospective audit was performed over a nine month period, from 1. st. January to 30. th. September 2003. Data was collected on 233 patients who had primary total knee arthroplasty performed during this period. Patients were transfused if their blood loss exceeded a pre-calculated maximal allowable loss, or based on a 48 hour post-operative haemoglobin level. Results: Seventeen of the 233 patients (7%) received allogeneic blood. The average amount received was two units. Pre-operative anaemia and advanced patient age were predictive for increased risk of transfusion. Thirty six per cent of patients who were given a cell saver did not collect sufficient blood for re-transfusion. Ten per cent of this group required further transfusion with allogeneic blood. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in either the percentage of patients transfused or the volume of blood given to each patient between the two periods of audit. We did not find post-operative cell salvage to be an effective method of reducing allogeneic blood use

More than half of patients with neck of femur (NOF) fractures report their pain as severe to very severe in the first 24hrs. Opioids remain the most commonly used analgesia and are effective for static pain but not dynamic pain. Opioids provide suboptimal analgesia when patients are in a dynamic transition state and their side-effects are a source of morbidity in these patients. The Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) involves infiltration of the fascia iliaca compartment with a large volume of low concentrated local anaesthetic to reduce pain by affecting the femoral and lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. The London Quality Standards for Fractured neck of femur services (2013) stated that the FICB should be routinely offered to patients. We performed an audit of patient outcomes following the introduction of the FICB across three centres. We performed a two-cycle audit across two hospitals in 2014/15. The first cycle audited compliance with the NICE guidance in the management and documentation of pain and AMTS (Abbreviated Mental Test Scores) in patients. The second cycle was conducted following the integration of the FICB into the multidisciplinary NOF fracture protocol across three hospital sites. Data was collected on numeric pain scores, pre and post-op AMTS and opioid requirements. There were 40 patients audited with 20 in the first cycle prior to the introduction of the FICB and 20 following this. In the second cycle, there was a statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) in the difference between the pre and post-op AMTS. The preliminary findings in this audit support the use of the FICB adjunct to analgesia in the pre-operative management of NOF fracture patients. The FICB is a safe procedure and the organisational learning of this procedure through a multidisciplinary approach can significantly improve the outcomes of NOF fracture patients

Parker et al examined the effect that delay to surgery has on patients with proximal femoral fractures. They found that a delay of more than 48 hours to surgery significantly increased the patient’s length of stay. They examined delays due to lack of theatre resource only. Therefore an audit was proposed at the RUH Bath to set a standard of care that fracture neck of femur patients should be operated on within 48 hours. One month of data was collected (August 2005) and analysed. Of 52 fracture neck of femur patients 23% were waiting longer than 48 hours. The recommendation was made to have extra lists made available for fracture neck of femur patients. In January 2006 the elective orthopaedic ward was closed (for 12 days) due to diarrhoea and vomiting. Therefore elective lists were utilised for trauma. The audit was repeated comparing these 12 days with 12 in December. In the December cohort seven neck of femur fracture patients waited more than 48 hours, in the January cohort no neck of femur patient waited more than 48 hours. A further recommendation was made for increased theatre capacity for neck of femur patients. Subsequent to these recommendations 2 half day fracture neck of femur lists have been added to the rota at the RUH Bath. (Tuesday and Thursday pm). The patients can be assessed and worked up as planned trauma and can be seen in advance by the anaesthetist. Audit of January 2007 fractured neck of femur patients showed that there were 46 patients treated with only 1 waiting more than 48 hours due to theatre capacity. In conclusion the audit process can work and achieve beneficial results as shown here. An accepted standard of care was taken from the literature, department performance analysed, changes implemented and closure of the audit loop has shown that it has worked

Background. The approach to Intramedullary (IM) fixation of long bone fractures remains a controversial issue. Early reports demonstrated less favourable results of retrograde nailing as compared with antegrade options due to higher non-union rates. The aim of this audit was to evaluate the outcomes of practice within the Trauma and Orthopaedic department with relation to IM nail fixation of diaphyseal femur fractures. Methodology. The Trauma database between February 2010 and September 2013 was used to identify all femur IM nailing procedures. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) software was used to classify the fractures according to the Muller AO classification. All 3–2 (Diaphyseal femur fractures) were included in the audit. PACS imaging together with outpatient documentation was evaluated for radiological and clinical outcome. Results. A total sample size of 23 patients was identified (13 antegrade vs. 10 retrograde approach fixations). Mean patient age was 67 years and male to female ratios were similar (11M vs. 12F). Antegrade nailing was performed in a younger population as compared to retrograde nailing (mean age 60 vs. 73 respectively). Mean time to union was somewhat more protracted in the retrograde group (7 vs. 5 months), although all fractures united. The most common complication with relation to antegrade nailing was due to distal locking screws backing out. I case of infection was reported in the retrograde nail group, which was treated successfully with antibiotic therapy. There were 2 cases of nonunion observed in the antegrade group. Conclusions. The results of our practice were comparable to those published in recent literature. Overall, union rates for the two groups of fixation were similar. Each fixation technique is associated with its own specific set of complications. As a general rule antegrade nailing was reserved for a younger population so as to prevent trauma to the native knee joint

Aim. The knee radiograph is a commonly requested investigation as the knee joint is commonly injured. Each radiograph exposes 0.01mSv of radiation to the patient that is equivalent to 1.5 days of natural background radiation. Also, each knee radiograph costs approximately £37.16 to produce. The aim of the clinical audit was to use the Pittsburgh knee rules to attempt to reduce the number of knee radiographs taken in patients with acute knee injuries and hence reduce the dose of ionising radiation the patient receives. Method. A retrospective audit was undertaken. 149 knee requests and radiographs taken during October 2016 were evaluated. Each knee radiograph request including patient history and clinical examination was graded against the Pittsburgh knee rules to give a qualifying score. The Pittsburgh knee rules assigns 1 point for each of the following; blunt trauma or a fall, age less than 12 years or over 50 years, and unable to take 4 limping weight bearing steps in the emergency department. A Pittsburgh knee rule qualifying score warranting a knee radiograph is 2 or more points, where the patient must have had blunt trauma or a fall. A Pittsburgh knee rule score less than 2 points predicts a non-fractured knee and hence no radiograph warranted. Each radiograph was reviewed if a fracture was present or not. Results. The clinical audit identified 85 true negative patients where their Pittsburgh knee rule score was less than 2 points and they did not have a fracture of the knee joint. The Pittsburgh knee rule score of less than 2 points did not warrant obtaining knee radiographs. Therefore, a total of 85 knee radiographs were unnecessary which is equivalent to 127.5 days of background radiation. The financial burden of these unnecessary radiographs is £2648.60. The negative predictive value of the Pittsburgh knee rules in this audit was 93.4%. Discussion. The clinical audit shows that the use of the Pittsburgh knee rules scoring system can reduce the number of knee radiographs obtained by 57.4% and hence the doses of ionising radiation patients are exposed to. The audit also showed this clinical scoring system has a high negative predictive value that when utilised can discern patients with a normal knee joint who do not require a knee radiograph. In conclusion employing the Pittsburgh knee rule scoring system can improve patient safety by reducing ionising radiation exposure and can reduce financial costs of patient encounters

The results are reported of an audit of allografts collected in the first 18 months of the Leicester Bone Bank. We retrieved 161 femoral heads at primary arthroplasty of which 103 were implanted into 59 patients. There were deep infections in two recipients and wound infections in five. In two of these cases, culture of the femoral head at implantation was positive but the organisms grown were not those which caused the clinical infection. We retrieved 22 large allografts from six cadavers. Four of these were contaminated at retrieval and required irradiation for sterilisation. There has been one clinical infection in the nine large allografts implanted so far. We recommend that all bone banks undertake prospective audit to ensure that high standards are maintained and wastage minimised

Appropriate surgical management of hip fractures has major clinical and economic consequences. Recently IMN use has increased compared to SHS constructs, despite no clear evidence demonstrating superiority of outcome. We therefore set out to provide further evidence about the clinical and economic implications of implant choice when considering hip fracture fixation strategies. A retrospective cohort study using Scottish hip fracture audit (SHFA) data was performed for the period 2016–2022. Patients ≥50 with a hip fracture and treated with IMN or SHS constructs at Scottish Hospitals were included. Comparative analyses, including adjustment for confounders, were performed utilising Multivariable logistic regression for dichotomous outcomes and Mann-Whitney-U tests for non-parametric data. A sub-group analysis was also performed focusing on AO-A1/A2 configurations which utilised additional regional data. Cost differences in Length of Stay (LOS) were calculated using defined costs from the NHS Scotland Costs book. In all analyses p<0.05 denoted significance. 13638 records were included (72% female). 9867 received a SHS (72%). No significant differences were identified in 30 or 60-day survival (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.05, 95%CI 0.90–1.23; p=0.532), (OR 1.10, 95%CI 0.97–1.24; p=0.138) between SHS and IMN's. There was however a significantly lower early mobilisation rate with IMN vs SHS (OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.59–0.70; p<0.001), and lower likelihood of discharge to domicile by day-30 post-admission (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.71–0.84; p<0.001). Acute and overall, LOS were significantly lower for SHS vs IMN (11 vs 12 days and 20 vs 24 days respectively; p<0.001). Findings were similar across a sub-group analysis of 559 AO A1/A2 fracture configurations. Differences in LOS potentially increases costs by £1230 per-patient, irrespective of the higher costs of IMN's v SHS. Appropriate SHS use is associated with early mobilisation, reduced LOS and likely with reduced cost of treatment. Further research exploring potential reasons for the identified differences in early mobilisation are warranted

Background. Best practice tariff (BPT) for hip fracture was introduced in April 2010, offering financial incentive to encourage trusts to implement best practice and improve quality of care. This equates to £1335. An early indicator of a patient's outcome is the time to operation from admission, with best practice targets of <36hours as a key marker of quality. As well as being detrimental to patient experience, delays in the time to operation have clear links to increased mortality rates. Method. We performed a retrospective audit of neck of femur fracture patients from 01.01.14 for 12 months, investigating time to theatre, other BPT targets, and attainment of BPT. A cost analysis was also performed from financial data. Results. Of 471 patients, 461 operations were performed. Our median time to surgery was 24.9 hours. 140 (30%) of patients were not operated on within 36 hours. 134 of these (96%) would have met the BPT had they been operated on within the 36 hour target i.e. all other BPT targets were met. This equates to a loss of £178,890. Conclusions. We achieved time to theatre target for 70% of patients (compared to 71.7% reported nationally), which is suboptimal. A solution is to dedicate more theatre time to hip fractures on theatre lists or lengthened daily trauma lists. However, at £1200 per hour running theatre, this on its own would not be cost effective. Improved theatre utilisation by 10% can potentially save the trust £3,960,000 in a year. We have put forward plans to audit our current theatre usage, potentially improving utilisation and efficiency (e.g. planned hip fracture first on list from previous day to avoid start delay). Additionally we have introduced a “Time of breach” onto our trauma board to concentrate attention on this part of best practice. Level of Evidence. Level 3

Purpose of the study and background. This audit report outlines a physiotherapy lead spinal triage program for inpatients in a private hospital. The reason to trial this model was proposed as a way to expedite the assessment of inpatients presenting with back pain and implement an appropriate and prompt management plan. Summary of the methods used and the results. An audit tool was developed to record the patient details and outcomes of referrals to the spinal triage program. Length of time between referral and triage was recorded as was the number of patients that went on to require a spinal surgeon consult and spinal intervention. A total of 75 patients were referred into Spinal Triage over a 7 month period. The majority of in patients referred for spinal consult within this private hospital setting were triaged solely by physiotherapy (56%) and a management plan decided on in conjunction with the spinal surgeon on call who could access any imaging remotely. Six patients (8%) involved in the triage program went on to have spinal surgical intervention. Conclusion. Results indicate that the majority of spinal consults at inpatient level do not proceed to require surgical intervention. These results support the model of using Physiotherapists to triage this patient group. I can confirm that this abstract has not previously been published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Source of funding: No funding obtained

Introduction: Sliding screws has been described to use in hip fractures since 1950s. Failure of fixation varies from 16 – 23%. We aim to assess the effect of audit and re auditing the failure rate after introduction of the Tip apex distance concept since January 2000 to December 2004. Methodology: We measured the tip apex distance in 161 (93 in the audit group and the rest re audit patients, 140 available for analysis. Their mean age at diagnosis 82.2 years [range 56.2–100.6 years] and male and female ratio was 1:6. Average time to Operation 1.7 days form the day of admission. The average Hospital Stay was 15.8 days. Result & discussion: We found that Patients had recorded Lag screw length 92.6mm [75–115], Side plate: 4 hole:6 hole = 4:1, Measured TAD 27.6 mm [6.3–66.4] in 140 patients,. The mean radiation time was 38.27 sec (7–71) and the dosage 0.68 Cgycm2 (0.93–2.06),. The mean Tip Apex Distance in the failed fixation group of 16 patients with cut out screw (13 in the audit group and 3 in the re audit group) is 43.05 [27.2–65.8]. Conclusion: We found the auditing and re auditing could potentially improve the surgical outcome. Although the Risk of cut out depends on many variable such as increasing age, Unstable fracture, poor reduction, high angle side plate 150deg, TAD is the stronger predictor than any other variable. This variable can be controlled by regular audit of the surgical practice

Aim: To assess satisfaction of patients seen in the fracture clinic in our DGH. The results from the audit were compared with the National Average to assess the efficiency and patient satisfaction. Methods: We did a questionnaire survey of patient satisfaction attending the fracture clinic in our DGH. The above audit was done for a period of 4 weeks on patients attending one orthopaedic surgeon fracture clinic during the month of March 2006. 130 patients completed the questionnaire, 20 of which were incomplete. This left us with 110 questionnaires for assessment. Results: The M:F was 11:7. 88% of them felt access to the clinic was easy. 12% of the patients were disabled of which only 15% felt the access was easy. 28% were seen on time and 65% were seen within 15 minutes of the stated appointment time. 82% of them felt that were not informed of the waiting time. 87% of them felt that were able to discuss their problem with the doctor. 95% of them felt the doctor explained the diagnosis and the reasons for their action in an understandable way. 94% felt the staffs were courteous. 91% were satisfied with the fracture clinic service, 60% felt the clinic was organised well, 88% felt their dignity was respected and 88% rated the care they received to be excellent to good. Conclusion: The above audit showed that majority of the patients seen in the fracture clinic were satisfied and level of service was comparable to the national average

The European Working Time Directive is a directive from the Council of Europe to protect the health and safety of workers in the European Union. The working time directive currently ensures a 56 working hour week and by August 2009 a 48 hour maximum working week. To accommodate such a reduction in working hours, the on call rotas for institutions have had to change. Has this had an affect on trauma exposure for current specialist registrars?. Materials and Methods: Data collection was from electronic logbooks of orthopaedic specialist registrars and locum appointment trainees on the Southwest Thames rotation. From the elogbooks indexed trauma procedures were audited, this included: dynamic hip screw, hemiarthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation ankle, intramedullary nail femur, intramedullary nail tibia, and intramedullary nail humerus. The data was divided into year groups and then the data was subdivided into on call rotas. Obtained from the data collection was the number of indexed linked operations carried out per 6 months per year group. Results: The data collection was over an 18 month period October 2006 – April 2008. The total number of trainee logbooks who had the complete data from the logbook available was 90. The number of trainees for each year = n, the total number of operations =x and mean number of operations for each year of training =μ. The results for year groups are as follows:Year 1 n=18, x=4897, μ= 272:Year 2 n=12, x=2853, μ= 238: Year 3 n=22, x=4106, μ= 187:Year 4 n=19, x=3176, μ= 167:Year 5 n=4, x=658, μ=165:Year 6 n=15, x=3249, μ=217.Data for on call rotas were subdivided into the following groups: 1in13, 1in9, 1in8 and 1in7. The number of trainees for each on type of on call rota =n, the total number of operations = x, the mean number of operations for each on call rota group = μ.The results were as follows:1in13 on call: n=12, x=2215, μ=185; 1in9 on call: n=11, x=3195, μ=290. 1in8 on call: n=20, x=3754, μ=188; 1in7 on call: n=47, x=9775, μ=208. The results for the number of indexed linked operations carried out per 6 months per year group are as follows:YEAR 1 257.73:YEAR 2 228.24:YEAR 3 173.49: YEAR 4 173.23:YEAR 5 164.50: YEAR 6 208.49. Conclusion: The results show that year groups 1, 2 and 6 have carried out the highest number of procedures. The data also shows that trainees on the lowest frequency of on call rota call have the lowest number of indexed operations. The results for the number of indexed linked operations carried out per 6 months per year group shows that as the year groups progress the number of procedures carried out continues to decrease from year 1 to 5 and then increases again at year 6. The structure of orthopaedic training is being overhauled. The need for effective training has intensified. This audit aims to demonstrate some of the effects of the changes made in higher speciality training in orthopaedics

Hallux rigidus was first described by Davies-Colley and Cotterill in 1887 and varied management techniques have been described by authors since. This paper carries out an audit looking at the management of hallux rigidus in 108 patients. A retrospective study was carried out on 108 patients coded as hallux rigidus/hallux valgus over a ten year period from 1992 to 2002 (33 male and 75 female) with a follow-up range from 3 to 144 months. Thirty three toes (27 patients) were fused, 20 toes had Tel Aviv procedures (17 patients) and 61 patients were managed conservatively. Of the 33 toes fused, 18 required a second procedure in the form of wire removal, two developed transient transfer metatarsalgia, one developed IP joint pain and one had asymptomatic fibrous non-union. Of the 20 Tel Aviv procedures, one toe developed hallux valgus requiring re-operation and two toes had unrelated complications, one requiring re-operation. A single method of MTP fusion when the audit was performed revealed an interesting outcome. Hallux rigidus must be managed as an ongoing continuum, not a static state

Introduction. Flexor tendon injuries are quite common injuries. They can result in persisting functional deficit if not repaired and appropriately rehabilitated. We look at flexor tendon injuries over a period of 1 year and re-audited three years later. Method. We audited all flexor tendon injuries that were treated at our institution and repeated the same audit three years after. We looked at various aspects of the injuries including the site injured, the zone of injury, other structures injured, the type of repair and material used as well as the rehabilitation regime. Results. The initial audit had 43 patients, 83% male, 55% unemployed with 85 tendon injuries. There were 35% zone 5 injuries with 34% repaired in <24hrs with modified Kessler core 3.0 prolene sutures and 6.0 prolene peripheral sutures. The rupture rate was 3% and the infection rate was 1%. A re-audited was done 3 years later, over the same time period, there were 69 patients, 83% male, 1% unemployed with 102 tendon injuries. There were 40% zone 2 injuries with 43% repaired with modified Kessler core 3.0 prolene sutures and 6.0 prolene peripheral sutures. Rupture rate was 9% and infection rate was 1% and 10% median nerve injury. All injuries were rehabilitated using the Belfast regime. Discussion and Conclusion. Flexor tendon injuries are frequently occurring injuries and require a careful and meticulous attention to detail, relative to repair, to achieve the most effective recovery. We found that over a three year period that the zone of injury in the cohort of patients in our region had changed, as well as the unemployment rate. Other parameters were generally similar. We conclude that treatment of flexor tendon injuries should undergo the audit cycle to ensure that best practice is achieved and maintained

Aim. NICE guidance on lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) recommends ongoing audit should be an integral part of disc replacement surgery. We present our ongoing audit data and the extent of problem of patients lost to follow up. Method. 35 patients underwent lumbar TDR surgery over 4.5 years. They were followed prospectively. A database is maintained and ODI and VAS were collected prospectively, including patient satisfaction and any failures. Results. At latest follow up full data was available for 30 out of 35 patients. The mean follow-up was 34 months (range 3-52 months). There were 13 males with a mean age 37.7 years (range 27-62) and 17 females with a mean age of 49.8 years (range 27-62). Surgery was single level in 24 cases and double level in 6 cases. 21 patients rated their outcome as good or very good and 7 as unsatisfactory. There were 2 failures, one secondary to late extrusion of the polyethylene liner (12 months post-surgery) and one early anterior migration of the prosthesis. ODI scores improved by a mean of 28 points (range -4 to 68) whilst VAB scores improved by a mean of 4.9 (range -1 to 9). Five patients had been lost to follow up. One patient migrated out of the area. Two came from out of the area and did not return for follow up after the initial period and two further patients DNAed multiple clinic appointments. Conclusion. We conclude that lumbar disc replacement surgery can provide substantial improvement in pain relief and function. Continued audit of this cohort of patients is essential to comply with NICE guidance. 14% loss to follow up/audit is encountered despite our best effort

Day case surgery is commonplace in the field of orthopaedic surgery, being suitable for a wide range of both trauma & elective procedures. It became apparent within our unit that an unacceptably high number of cases were being cancelled for a variety of reasons. We set out to identify these reasons and thereby develop a simple screening process to reduce the number of cancellations. Initial audit over a 1 year period showed 25% of the 907 day case patients were being cancelled. We subdivided the reasons for these cancellations at both pre-operative assessment and on the day of surgery into avoidable [e.g. no carer / telephone, uncontrolled BP, high BMI and ischaemic heart disease] and unavoidable [e.g. surgery no longer required, patient unwell, list cancelled for emergencies, patient DNA]. The majority of our cancellations fell into the “avoidable” category, predominantly at pre-operative assessment. Accordingly, we devised a simple screening questionnaire to be used by clinicians in out-patients at the time of listing for surgery, based on the RCS guidelines (1985). If any of the questions were answered “Yes”, the patient was not suitable for day case surgery. The patient information letter was also changed, informing patients that non-attendance would result in their removal from the waiting list. Re-audit of 727 patients over the next 12 months showed a fall in cancellations to only 11%, with the majority of these being for unavoidable reasons. Cancellations are a source of inconvenience, distress and frustration to both clinician and patient, are a waste of hospital time and resources, and lead to an increase in waiting lists. Our study demonstrates the value of closing the loop in audit, leading to a dramatic reduction in cancellations. Audit is a useful tool to improve patient care, and is not merely a “number-crunching” exercise

In recent years there has been growing interest in enhanced recovery regimes in lower limb arthroplasty due to potential clinical benefits of early mobilisation along with cost-savings. Following adoption of this regime in a district general hospital, it was observed that traditional dressings were a potential barrier to its success with ongoing wound problems in patients otherwise fit for discharge. The aim of this audit was to assess current wound care practice, implement a potentially improved regime and re-evaluate practice. A prospective clinical audit was performed over a three month period involving 100 patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Fifty patients with traditional dressings were evaluated prior to change in practice to a modern dressing (Aquacel™ Surgical). Fifty patients were then evaluated with the new dressing to complete the audit cycle. Clinical outcome measures included wear time, number of changes, blister rate and length of stay. Statistical comparisons were performed using Mann Whitney or Fisher's Exact test (statistical significance, p<0.05). Wear time for the traditional dressing (2 days) was significantly shorter than the modern dressing (7 days), p<0.001, and required more changes (0 vs. 3 days), p<0.001. 20% of patients developed blisters with the traditional dressing compared with 4% with the modern dressing (p=0.028). Length of stay was the same for the modern dressing (4 days) compared with the traditional dressing (4 days). However, in the modern group 75% of patients were discharged by day 4 whereas in the traditional group this took until day 6. This audit highlights the problems associated with traditional dressings with frequent early dressing changes, blistering and delayed discharge. These adverse outcomes can be minimised with a modern dressing specifically designed for the demands of lower limb arthroplasty. Units planning to implement enhanced recovery regimes should consider adopting this dressing to avoid compromising patient discharge

Diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) can be challenging. We explore the role of fracture clinic in diagnosis and management with a closed-loop audit of new guidelines. We retrospectively reviewed patients with CRPS over 3.5 years. We determined the delay from injury to commencement of treatment and monitored symptoms. New guidelines were introduced to fracture clinic in January 2013. The Budapest Criteria aids diagnosis. GAD-7 and PHQ-9 patient questionnaires grade symptoms. Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe nortriptylline or pregabalin, refer to physiotherapy and review patients after six weeks. We re-audited prospectively after implementing these guidelines. The first audit cycle found 11 patients in 3.5 years. The mean delay to anti-neuropathic medication from injury was 4.7 months. Two patients required psychotherapy, one intravenous pamidronate, three inpatient physiotherapy under nerve blocks and two spinal cord stimulators. After implementing guidelines, there were 14 patients with CRPS in 9 months. All but two patients received anti-neuropathic medication on the day of diagnosis. All patients treated appropriately improved markedly within 4–12 weeks. No patients required escalation of treatment. Our guidelines increased pick-up rates of CRPS, diagnoses were made earlier and treatment started sooner. Physiotherapy modalities remained varied, however, early anti-neuropathic treatment led to a rapid improvement in all cases

We present a complete audit cycle of Emergency Department management of paediatric clavicle fractures at Derriford Hospital. Local guidelines divide the clavicle into three zones. Fractures with minimal displacement in the middle 3/5th heal in the majority of cases without complication and can be discharged without need for follow up, provided parents are adequately educated. An initial audit cycle of 63 cases identified short comings in adherence to the guidelines. These included: Unnecessary fracture clinic follow up of ‘Zone 2’ fractures in 85% and omission of written advice in 86%. The results were circulated, ‘aide memoir’ icons were added to the department's computer coding system, staff teaching sessions were organised and a patient advice sheet was produced. Following the implementation of changes, a 23 case re-audit showed fewer unnecessary referrals to fracture clinic (17% vs. 85%) and improvements in the number of parents being given written advice (43% vs. 14%). Staff training, provision of information leaflets and changes to the ED coding system dramatically improved the adherence to hospital guidance. This resulted in standardisation of care, fewer unnecessary appointments and cost savings to the trust. Following this audit, a telephone survey was completed to assess parent's satisfaction with their treatment

Aim and objectives of the study: To assess the true incidence and reasons for readmission after fracture neck of femur treatment and its effect on Trust star rating. Introduction: Star ratings (zero to three) show how well a Trust is performing and is awarded against a set of performance indicators (Patient Focus, Capacity and Capability Focus and Clinical Focus) as laid by CHAI. These indicators cover the standards and outcomes of treatment given. CHAI reports 9% readmission as an emergency within 28 days, and assumes that a proportion of the observed readmissions are potentially avoidable. Materials and Methods: An audit done by the managers found 15 (19%) cases of readmission of fracture neck of femur during April to October 2004. We did Re audit by reviewing the exact cause for readmissions in all the cases. Results: Out of 15 cases identified by the managers only 4 (5.19%) were true readmission, which is below the national average.8 readmissions were for medical reasons, 3 for social reasons and rest 4 were related to fracture complications like infection. Conclusion: Star ratings (zero to three) reflect Trust performance and are awarded against a set of performance indicators, which cover the standards, and outcomes of treatment given (Patient Focus, Capacity and Capability Focus and Clinical Focus) as laid by CHAI. We conclude that audit should be done as a team-work involving all responsible health care professionals and proper uniform coding system needs to be followed to obtain correct results

Aim: To assess the impact of a proforma pathway on the care of patients following fractured neck of femur at Maidstone General Hospital compared to the gold standard set out in the British Orthopaedic Association and British Geriatric Society Blue Book – The Care of Patients with a Fragility Fracture. Objectives: Initial audit of care prior to the introduction of the Proforma. Development of a multidisciplinary care pathway and proforma following BOA Standards for Trauma (BOAST) and National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) guidelines. Re-audit of care following implementation of the proforma. Identification of areas for development to implement in the NHS (Institute for Innovation and Improvement) Rapid Improvement Program – Focus on Fractured Neck of Femur. Background: The recent publication of the BOA and BGS Blue Book guidelines for care of patients with fragility fractures has defined a gold standard for the care of these patients. This has highlighted the areas of care that are commonly suboptimal and defined the requirements of a department providing ideal care. Both this, and the introduction of the NHFD and the resultant requirements for data collection and monitoring led us to develop a proforma for management and data collection. Methods: An initial audit of care was performed. Notes were reviewed retrospectively for 62 patients and results were compared to the gold standard. In June 2008 the proforma was implemented and data collected for reaudit (n=48). Direct comparison and statistical analysis was performed for the two groups of patients. Results: Comparison of the two audit groups shows dramatic and highly statistically significant differences in a number of areas of patient care, notably: mortality rates; appropriate A& E investigation and treatment; documentation of correct diagnosis and social history; mental test scoring; time to ward admission; time to surgery and osteoporosis treatment. Discussion: The lack of a ring fenced, dedicated trauma ward leads to patients being admitted to outlying wards following fractured neck of femur. These wards are less likely to be as well equipped to deal with the unique requirements of these patients, which may explain the consistent problems with pressure area care and delay in discharge. A strong recommendation for gold standard care is the provision of an orthogeriatric service with regular medical review both pre- and post-operatively. Currently no such dedicated service exists at Maidstone and this affects both the treatment of acute medical problems and the provision of falls investigation and treatment. The introduction of the pathway has clearly benefitted the management of this difficult problem. With the support of the Rapid Improvement Program, further beneficial changes can be made to the care of patients following fractured NOF

Hip fracture is a common and serious injury affecting the elderly. Many patients have co-morbidities which may need to be investigated and treated before surgery but, conversely, delay in surgical management of these patients leads to increased morbidity and mortality. The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (SHFA). 1. conducted in 2007 showed variations between hospitals in postponement rates for medical reasons. The report referred to 11 major clinical abnormalities described by McLaughlin. 2. that were associated with poor postoperative outcomes and should be corrected before surgery. This prospective audit took place in Monklands hospital for a duration of 6 weeks. All patients admitted to the orthopaedic firm from 14. th. Oct 2012 to 26. th. November 2012 with confirmed fracture neck of femur were prospectively included in the audit. A detailed review of the notes took place to identify whether delays were appropriate according to McLaughlin. There were a total of 23 patients admitted during the audit period of which 21 were operated on and 2 patients treated conservatively. The mean age of this cohort was 82.8 (range 55–91) with a male to female ratio of 1:1.3. Sixteen cases (76%) were operated on within 48 hours of admission (11 cases – 52% within 24 hours). Five cases (24%) were delayed by more than 48 hours. Three cases (14%) were delayed due to lack of theatre time. Two patients (9.5%) were delayed due to request of ECHO for ?new murmur. Our practice of managing hip fracture patients is similar to other units in Scotland with a deferral rate of approximately 25%. The patients who have a major clinical abnormality were appropriately investigated and treated before the surgery. Further improvement in management of the theatre time is needed as surgery is delayed for >24 hours in approximately 15% of medically fit hip fracture patients

The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (. 1. ) was founded on Rikshoft, the Swedish hip fracture register (. 2. ), and since 1993 has documented case-mix, process and outcomes of hip fracture care in Scotland. Evidence-based national guidelines on hip fracture care were updated by a multidisciplinary group in 2002(. 3. ). And hip fracture serves as a tracer condition by the health quality assurance authority for its work on older people, which reported in 2004 (. 4. ). Audit data are used locally to document care and support and monitor service developments. Synergy between the guidelines and the audit provides a means of improving care locally and monitoring care nationally. External review by the quality assurance body shows to what extent guideline-based standards relating to A& E care, pre-operative delay, multidisciplinary care and audit participation are met. Three national-level initiatives on hip fracture care have delivered: reliable and largescale comparative information on case-mix, care and outcomes; evidence-based recommendations on care; and nationally accountable standards inspected and reported by the national health quality assurance authority. These developments are linked and synergistic, and enjoy both clinical and managerial support. They provide an evolving framework for clinical governance and quality assurance, with methods for casemix-adjusted outcome assessment for hip fracture care also now developed

Aim: To reduce the amount of blood wastage in our unit. Method: In 72 patients, the number of blood units cross-matched and the haemoglobin/haematocrit fall were audited for primary total shoulder replacement (n=44), primary hemiarthroplasty (n=21), and revision shoulder replacement (n=7) over twelve months (January 2008 to December 2008). The amount of crossmatched blood was compared to the amount of blood transfused, pre-operative haemoglobin and fall in haemoglobin/haematocrit. Results: 23 of 44 primary total shoulder replacements and 5 of 21 hemiarthroplasties were crossmatched 55 units preoperatively. 4 of the 7 revision arthroplasties were crossmatched 7 units preoperatively. No units were transfused. 4 patients were later transfused 2 units each for symptomatic low haemoglobin at day 3–5 postoperatively from postoperatively crossmatched blood. No correlation existed between preoperative haemoglobin and number of units blood ordered. A haemoglobin reduction of ~2.5 g/dl was seen for both primary and revision surgery. There was significant correlation between low preoperative haemoglobin and need for transfusion (p< 0.05). Nearly all patients in whom blood was crossmatched rather than group and saved, belonged to one consultant. No patients had an adverse outcome due to a lack of immediately available cross-matched blood. Conclusion: A large amount of blood was crossmatched and no units used in primary and revision shoulder replacement surgery. We recommend group and save only in primary shoulder arthroplasty and crossmatch of 2 units for revision shoulder surgery. Providing pre-operative haemoglobin is > 11.5 g/dl, group and save is safe even for revision shoulder arthroplasty. Wastage of blood could be reduced to zero in our unit. We recommend regular audit as a tool to ensure compliance with guidelines, and for clinical governance purposes ensuring guidelines remain best practice

An independent audit of Lumbar Spinal surgery performed by a single surgeon over a 4 year period is presented. The three groups evaluated included Lumbar fusion, decompression and discectomy. Patients were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Questionairre and five other questions related to overall outcome and patient satisfaction. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Patient response rate was 74%. The overall outcome was 81% Excellent/Good vs 19% Fair/Poor. The best outcomes were in the discectomy group. The decompression group showed a variable and unpredictable outcome. Complications encountered in the three subgroups are discussed. Lumbar spinal surgery offers lasting and predictable outcomes to a large majority of well selected patients. Independent surgical audits form an important part of evaluating one’s surgical practice

Hip fractures have increased in most western countries during the end of the last century. This increase will continue mainly because of an increasing number of elderly persons and also due to an increase in the risk of hip fractures in the oldest. This constitutes a threat to resources for medical care. Practise differs concerning choice of operation method and principles for rehabilitation throughout the world. A national registration of the outcome after hip fractures in the elderly started in 1988 in Sweden to compare different methods of surgery, mobilization and rehabilitation. This project has attracted great international interest and several centres have participated with prospective registration. With support from the European Commission a project was started in 1995 called Standardised Audit of Hip Fracture in Europe (SAHFE). The project aims to encourage centres in Europe to participate in a hip fracture audit with a defined data set consisting of a core of 34 questions which includes outcome measures at 4 months from operation. Printed forms are distributed to the participants as well as a computer program designed for the project. In addition there is a large number of optional questions. Each participating centres collects its own data and registers for own analysis. The data are then sent to the project centre in Lund. Hospitals wishing to participate in these international comparisons are welcome. The SAHFE project will promote comparisons of demographic features, surgical technique and rehabilitation methods to facilitate the dissemination of the best practise of hip fracture surgery and rehabilitation throughout Europe. Further international participation will widen the spectrum and facilitate improvements of the hip fracture treatment of benefit both to the patients and the society which has to provide health care to the increasing number of elderly

Purpose and Background: The introduction of clinical governance made NHS organisations accountable for the monitoring and continuous improvement of the quality of patient care at all levels, across all services. Implementation of evidence-based practice and provision of an adequate infrastructure to support it is a major component and at local level, clinicians in all NHS organisations are required to participate fully in audit. The following describes the second phase. *. of a study investigating the dissemination and utilisation of an audit toolkit for the UK acute low back pain guideline through clinical governance routes. *. Phase I Results Were Previously Reported At SBPR. Methods: structured telephone interviews were conducted with 50 clinical governance leads and 22 clinical audit leads in 72 primary care trusts (pcts). the qualitative data were analysed using a framework approach involving identification of issues, concepts and themes and the construction of a theoretical perspective for the main categories. these were cross-validated by the original interviewer checking for dissonance. Results: Six categories were identified: priorities; capacity and resources; loss of quality support groups; organisational issues; local environment and lack of audit strategies. the results suggest that low back pain is still a considerable problem but has lost its priority status at both government and local levels, largely due to the introduction of national service frameworks (nsfs) and to inadequate resourcing. primary care has a huge agenda that is seen as being grossly under-resourced with respondents reporting difficulty in meeting nsf requirements. many localities had not generated or finalised audit strategies while gp autonomy and poor communication between the gps and pcts were identified as barriers to the implementation of audit processes in primary care. Conclusion: Presently, implementation of evidence-based healthcare for non-priority areas seems not to be feasible through clinical governance routes. without nsf status, the likelihood of seeing clinical audit used to assure evidence-based primary care for low back pain seems remote

Purpose: An audit was undertaken to evaluate the patients’ experience of foot surgery at the great Western Hospital in 2004 following the appointment of a podiatric surgeon to the orthopaedic department. Method: The first 100 patients that were operated on by the podiatric surgeon (Group 1) were matched by OPCS code to a randomly selected patient cohort that had been operated on by orthopaedic surgeons (Group 2). All patients were at a minimum of 6 months post-surgery (range 6–10 months Gp. 1, 11–20 months Gp. 2). The audit department sent out an anonymous questionnaire relating to the patients’ experience both before and after their surgery as well as current levels of satisfaction with the outcome of their surgery. Results: The response rate was 64% in Gp.1 and 68% in Gp.2. The patients’ overall satisfaction with the result of their foot surgery was determined using a Likert scale and the results can be seen in Table 1. Patients in the podiatric surgical group were significantly more satisfied with the result of their foot surgery than those in the orthopaedic group (p< 0.008; Mann Whitney U test). Similar statistically significant differences were also seen between the two groups relating to patient satisfaction with their pre and post-operative consultations and information concerning their proposed surgery and its outcome. Conclusion: The results of this audit suggest that the satisfaction of patients following foot surgery can rise significantly following the appointment of a podiatric surgeon to a general hospital orthopaedic department

Purpose of the study: To audit the radiological position of the tunnels following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Methods: Postoperative radiographs were obtained on patients following ACL reconstruction in a single surgeon series. The positions of the tunnel in the femur and the tibia were measured and recorded. The tunnel positions were compared to the recommended positions as established by literature review. Lateral radiographs displaying greater than 2mm of imperfect projection in relation to the femoral condyles were noted. Results: 108 radiographs were collected from 105 patients, 60 were right knees and 48 were left. There were 88 men and 17 women. When measured along Blumensaats line from the anterior condylar surface, the femoral tunnel in the saggital plane should be found at 75% of the total anteroposterior distance, the recorded figure in this audit was 74%. Measured from the anterior edge in the saggital plane, the tibial tunnel should be found at 44% of the total tibial depth, our measurements averaged 40%. The tibial tunnel in the coronal plane should be found at 45% of the total width from the medial edge, our measurements averaged 46%. 57 (53%) of the radiographs demonstrated imperfect lateral projection of greater than 2mm. Conclusion: The position of the tunnels analyzed in this audit compare favourably with the positions recommended in the available literature. Over 50% of the lateral radiographs displayed imperfect lateral projection greater than 2mm. Imperfect lateral film projection affects the apparent position of the tunnel. Any interpretation of position as it appears on a two-dimensional image must take into account possible errors in the image

Background: Osteoporosis is a significant cause of morbidity and disability through an increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture. In March 2001 guidelines were produced by The Clinical Resource Efficiency Support Team (CREST) on the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis, which were distributed throughout the primary and secondary care groups. Aim: The aim of this audit was to analyse the use of the CREST guidelines within the secondary care sector. Methods: The audit was conducted from January 2002 until March 2003. The sample group was identified retrospectively from September 2001 to February 2002 from patients over 45 years of age with diagnosis of osteoporosis / osteopenia and an osteoporotic fracture. All patients sampled were admitted to the secondary care sector, and data was collected using the CREST audit tool data collection form, utilising the information on the central fracture database located at the Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast. Results: 213 patients studied (165 female). Mean age 73 yrs (Range 41 to 100yrs). 5% had a risk factor for osteoporosis. 30 patients had previous fragility fracture, 9 male and 21 female, 21 of which were either wrist, hip or spine. Of these 30 patients, 4 (13%) had a diagnosis of osteoporosis considered. Regarding most recent fracture; in males (n=46); 24 (52% hip, 15 (33%) vertebra and 7 (15%) colles, in females (n=156); 66 (42%) hip, 62 (40%) colles, 18 (12%) and 10 (6%) hip and colles. 28 patients (13%) received lifestyle advice concerning osteoporosis. Pharmacological intervention; in males 1 (2%) calcium and vitamin D and 47 (98%) no treatment, in females 10 (6%) calcium, 18 (11%) calcium and vitamin D, 5 (3%) bisphosphonate, 4 (2%) SERM, 3 (2%) HRT and 125 (76%) no treatment. 91 patients underwent operation for hip fracture, 33% of operations were completed within 24 hour period, and 74% completed with 72 hour period. Grade of anaesthetist supervising operations: 80% Consultant, 12% Specialist Registrar, 7% Senior House Officer and 1% Staff Grade. 93% of patients received both prophylactic antibiotics and anti-coagulation prior to surgery. 83% of patients were identified at risk of falling, but only 17% had documented evidence that fall prevention advice had been given. Summary: Only 5% of patients were identified as having a risk factor for osteoporosis; 14% of patients had a previous low trauma fracture – a strong independent risk factor – however in only 13% of these 30 patients had osteoporosis been considered at time of fracture; only 13% of patients received any form of lifestyle advice; only 17% had advice given regarding fall prevention. These low figures could be due to improper recording, or simply that advice was not given. The vast majority of patients received no form of pharmacological intervention. In regards to surgery; time to operation, grade of anaesthetist and prophylactic treatments were appropriate in the vast majority of cases. Conclusion: The current cost of hip fractures in Northern Ireland is £21 million per year and with 90% of these fractures related to osteoporosis it is important that steps are taken to ensure early diagnosis, and that appropriate action is taken in the prevention and treatment. As can be seen, the CREST Guidelines are being adhered to in parts, however patients at risk are not being identified and appropriate pharmacological treatment and lifestyle advice is not being given

Intramedullary nails are a well accepted method of fixing fractures of the femur, however there are several potential complications associated with femoral nail insertion. One under-reported complication is perforation of the anterior cortex of the distal femur. Cortical perforation is well documented in immature bone however there is little evidence of perforation in skeletally mature adults. We present a 5 year retrospective clinical audit into correct positioning of the TriGen™ intramedullary nail system (Smith & Nephew Inc.), with respect to determining the anterior cortex perforation rate. Cases were identified using searches of the electronic operation notes, followed by manual cross checking of the reference numbers of the implants used. The radiographs for each case were then checked to identify cases of distal anterior cortex perforation. 138 femoral nails were inserted over the 5 years 2005–2010 at our institution. 79 cases met the inclusion criteria, of which 8 were deemed to show radiological evidence of cortical perforation on lateral view, this represents a perforation rate of 10.1% in this population. There was also a significant difference in the mean age of the perforated vs non-perforated groups (80.1 vs 62.1 yrs respectively). These results are at odds with the current literature which reports few or no cases of cortical perforation. As a result of this audit we have made various recommendations for future practice. This study highlights a need for larger scale randomised trials to be carried out in the future

Introduction: Seeding of bone or soft tissue tumour along the biopsy tract is a known complication of percutaneous biopsies. Correct surgical management requires preoperative Identification and excision of the biopsy tract at time of surgery. We aim to audit how well biopsy tract sites can be identified preoperatively and investigate factors influencing their Identification. Method: Prospective audit of patients who had tissue biopsies for bone and soft tissue tumours at the RNOH Stanmore and presented for surgery between February and April 2008. Case note analysis, patient history and examination at the time of surgery used to collect data. Results: 13/23 patients had their biopsy tract site accurately identified preoperatively, with a mean time gap of 43 days (6–118) between biopsy and excision. In 10/23 patients the biopsy site could not be accurately identified preoperatively. In these patients the mean time between biopsy and excision was 106 days (55–158) (p=< 0.05). 7 patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a mean time gap of 110 days; in 5/7 the tract site was unidentifiable. One patient had preoperative radiotherapy and the biopsy site was unidentifiable. Discussion: This audit has shown that Identification of the biopsy site is more difficult after 40 days. In order to ensure accurate Identification of the biopsy site an Indian ink tattoo should be considered at time of biopsy. It may be particularly advisable for patients who are likely to require neoadjuvant chemotherapy or preoperative radiotherapy. On this basis we would recommend that all patients have the biopsy site marked at the time of biopsy and a further audit will be carried out to evaluate this change in practice

The administration of prophylactic antibiotics is essential in the prevention of surgical site infection, particularly when metalwork is implanted. Intravenous Cefuroxime has been the antibiotic of choice for prophylaxis in our unit over the last few years. Unfortunately this has been linked to an increased rate of Clostridium Difficile infection. Our departmental antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines, based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), were therefore revised, such that intravenous Flucloxacillin and Gentamicin became the first line agents. We primarily aimed to assess whether prophylactic antibiotics were being administered according to our revised local guidelines. Steps were then taken to improve adherence to the guidelines, and the audit repeated. Data was collected prospectively between 1. st. November 2010 and 28. th. November 2010 (cycle 1). Demographic data, type of surgery, details of choice, dose and timing of antibiotic administration were compiled. The quality of documentation was also reviewed. Interventions to improve adherence to the guidelines were commenced between 1. st. January 2011 and 28. th. February 2011. This included a departmental presentation, supplementary distribution of the guidelines and email communication to all orthopaedic surgeons and anaesthetists to increase awareness. A repeat audit cycle was performed between 1. st. March 2011 and 28. th. March 2011 (cycle 2). All data was stored and statistically analysed using SPSS for Windows 17.0. A total of 130 patients were included, with 65 patients in each cycle. Demographic data and type of surgery were reasonably similar in both cycles. Intravenous antibiotics, when required, were administered within 30 minutes of the surgical incision in most cases in both cycles of the audit. In the first cycle of the audit only 9 out of 65 patients (14%) received the correct antibiotics as suggested by our updated guidelines. This improved significantly to 46 out of 57 patients (81%) in the second cycle. Documentation of antibiotic prescribing in the anaesthetic record, operation note and drug charts also improved in the second cycle. We observed poor initial adherence to our updated guidelines as most patients received incorrect antibiotic prophylaxis. However, following our audit interventions to increase awareness of the new guidelines, we witnessed a significant improvement in compliance. Our next step will be to ensure that the new policy of using intravenous Flucloxacillin and Gentamicin does indeed reduce the rate of Clostridium Difficile infection while maintaining a low rate of deep and superficial wound infection

Introduction

Virtual fracture clinics (VFC's) aim to reduce the number of outpatient appointments while improving the clinical effectiveness and patients experience through standardisation of treatment pathways. With 4.6% of ED admissions due to trauma the VFC prevents unnecessary face to face appointments providing a cost savings benefit to the NHS.

Patients with hip fracture are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Chemical thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with a risk of major bleeding in certain patient groups, such as those with renal failure. In these patients, unfractionated heparin should be used. Our aim was to determine the practice of VTE risk assessment in patients admitted with hip fracture against the national guidance, which states that all should have VTE risk assessment on admission. We also assessed the impact of introducing the VTE risk assessment form on prescribing practice of chemical thromboprophylaxis in patients with renal failure. Prospective audit of patients of 50 patients admitted with hip fracture from 4/8/10 with re-audit of 50 patients admitted from 17/2/2011 after introducing the VTE risk assessment form into the hip fracture admissions proforma. Retrospective analysis was undertaken to determine chemical thromboprophylaxis prescribing in patients with eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m. 2. . Patient demographics were comparable in both audit loops, with the mean age being equal (84 years) and an equal majority of female patients (76%). There were similar numbers of patients with eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m. 2. in both audit loops with 8% (n=4) in the initial audit, and 10% (n=5) in the re-audit. Frequency of VTE risk assessment significantly increased from 16% to 86% after including the VTE risk assessment form in the hip fracture proforma (p<0.0001). Despite this, there was no significant reduction in prescribing of LMWH in patients with renal failure with eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m. 2. , (P=0.52). Documentation of VTE risk assessment in patients admitted with hip fracture can be improved by simple measures such as inclusion of the VTE risk assessment form in the admissions proforma. However, this did not result in a reduction of LMWH prescribed in patients with significant renal failure and risk of major bleeding

In January 2000 we introduced identical guidelines for the more rapid rehabilitation of Achilles tendon ruptures, whether treated operatively or non-operatively. A relaxed equinus cast was used to four weeks, then a CAM walker to eight weeks with supervised mobilisation. The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of the operative and non-operative groups treated with the same rehabilitation program and audit the effectiveness of these guidelines. The audit was retrospective from January 2000 till January 2008. The patients were identified from the Emergency Department admissions database, the hospital clinical coding system, the department’s surgical audit data and the hospital physiotherapy appointment system. The audit system was used to identify patients that had complications of their operative treatment, re-ruptures or readmissions. This study focused on the end points of re-rupture, readmission, complications including wound complications and infection. Five hundred and eighty seven presentations were recorded as Achilles tendon injuries. One hundred and eighty patients were treated operatively and 407 patients were treated conservatively. Seventy five patients (42%) treated operatively and 126 patients (30%) of the non-operative group were rehabilitated in our hospital physiotherapy department. The remaining 386 patients (65.7% of all patients) received physiotherapy elsewhere or did not attend for further treatment. In the operative group there were two re-ruptures (1.1%) both treated in our hospital physiotherapy department. There were 2 wound complications (1.1%), one requiring re-operation. In the non operative group there were 15 re-ruptures (3.7%). Of these three had attended the hospital physiotherapy department (rerupture rate of 2.4%) In the non-operative group treated elsewhere there were 12 re-ruptures from 281 patients (4.2%). Comparable results were found between operative and non-operative treatment when combined with close physiotherapy guidance. Non-operatively treated patients treated in the community may have higher re-rupture rates. The results are comparable to those in the literature suggesting that the guidelines are effective

Introduction: Practice guidelines recommend functional restoration as a cardinal intervention for chronic low back pain. Published studies attest variously to either modest or good efficacy for functional restoration programs. However, although published data might set a benchmark of what outcomes can be achieved in research studies, they do not necessarily indicate what is actually achieved in conventional practice. Methods: A prospective audit was undertaken of all patients referred for functional restoration in a rehabilitation service dedicated primarily to the treatment of low back pain. In accordance with published principles 1, the program provided education and physical rehabilitation in a cognitive-behavioural milieu. Before treatment, immediately after treatment, and three months and six months later, patients were assessed, by a research nurse not involved in the patients’ care, using a visual analogue scale for pain, the SF36 for function, a patient-specified functional outcome scale, and the treatment helpfulness questionnaire. As well, the need for other care was recorded. Results: Forty-six patients enrolled in the study, but nine did not complete the rehabilitation program, and five withdrew their consent. Only two were lost to follow-up. Before treatment, those patients who withdrew and those who participated did not differ in presenting features. All had a moderate level of pain; they were moderately disabled in physical functioning, social functioning, and vitality; but were only slightly impaired in general health and mental health. All could nominate four activities of daily living that were impaired by their pain and which most dearly they would want restored. After treatment, median pain scores did not improve; nor was physical functioning, or social functioning, or vitality improved. Only one patient restored their desired activities of daily living. The majority of patients (25/30) restored no activity. These outcomes did not improve at the 3-month or 6 month-review. Patients previously unemployed remained unemployed. The proportion of patients previously employed (80%) fell immediately after treatment (70%) and remained stable thereafter. All patients required some form of continuing care from their general practitioner. Notwithstanding these outcomes, the majority of patients rated the program as helpful (57%) or extremely helpful (33%). Discussion: The sample size in the present study was similar to that used in the original studies that promoted functional restoration. Statistically and clinically, the outcomes in this audit are incompatible and totally dissonant with published claims of 80% success rates for functional restoration programs. The 95% confidence intervals of a success rate of zero are 0 to 11%, which fails to reach the lower 95% confidence interval of 80%, which is 66%. These results warn that what is achieved in conventional practice may not reflect the benchmarks established in the literature. Evidence from research may not translate into standards of practice. Citing the literature is not a substitute or surrogate for auditing one’s own outcomes

Paediatric wrist fractures are routinely managed with closed reduction and a molded cast. Gap(GI) and Cast indices(CI) are useful in predicting re-displacement following application of cast. Over 6 months we audited the efficacy of molded cast application following closed reduction of distal radial fractures in paediatric patients. The standard was that proposed by Malviya et al where GI >0.15 and CI >0.8 indicate an increased risk of re-displacement. Age, date and time of operation and surgeon's grade were collected. Pre-op displacement, post-reduction GI and CI and subsequent re-displacement were measured using imaging. Post audit intended changes to practice were presented to all surgeons, a “one-pager” was placed above scrub sinks. Re-audit was conducted at 1 year. The audit and re-audit included 28 and 24 patients respectively. Cast molding (CI) improved minimally following intervention (32% to 29%). Cast padding (GI) improved significantly (82% to 63%). Loss of reduction decreased slightly (14% to 12%), this was not accurately predicted by GI and CI in the re-audit. Audit demonstrated that casts were loose, over-padded and did not hold reduction adequately. Re-audit demonstrated that tighter, less padded but still inadequately molded casts were being applied with minimal change in loss of reduction

Blood is a costly commodity with side-effects that can be avoided by eliminating unnecessary transfusion. The purpose of this study was to prospectively audit the amount of blood we were transfusing in elective joint surgery and to then institute a new, more scientifically based post-operative protocol to see if we could reduce our transfusion requirements. We prospectively audited 79 patients undergoing primary knee or hip arthroplasty (38 knees and 41 hips) in our unit and found that 66% (58% of knees and 73% of hips) had at least one unit of blood transfused postoperatively, with a mean transfusion requirement of 1. 3 units per patient (1. 1 for knees, range 0–6; 1. 5 for hips, range 0–4). We then devised a new protocol for post-operative blood transfusion. This new protocol requires the calculation of the volume of blood that each individual patient can safely lose (maximum allowable blood loss – MABL) based upon their weight and pre-operative haematological indices. Total blood loss up to this volume is replaced with colloid. In the first 24 hours, if a patient’s total blood loss reaches their MABL they have their haematocrit measured at the bedside using the Microspin™ system. If their haematocrit is low (< 0. 30 for males, < 0. 27 for females) they are transfused blood. We set our ‘transfusion trigger’ after the first 24 hours at 8. 5 g/dl. Blood is transfused if the formal haemoglobin check on days 1, 2 or 3 is less than this. We conducted a further audit of 82 patients (35 knees, 47 hips) following the institution of this protocol. Under the new protocol only 24% of patients required blood (11 % of knees, 34% of hips) with a mean transfusion requirement of 0. 56 units per patient (0. 26 for knees, range 0–4; 0. 79 for hips, range 0–4). The use of clinical audit and the institution of strict guidelines for transfusion can effectively change transfusion practice and result in the delivery of improved patient care. Our transfusion protocol is a simple and effective method of keeping blood transfusion to a minimum and is particularly useful in a unit that does not have the facility to use autologous blood or re-infusion drains for elective orthopaedic surgery

Introduction. We conducted an audit on hip fractures to analyse the accuracy of coding and payment by results in our institution. Materials/Methods. The initial audits analysed hip fracture over a period of four months at two different trusts. Case notes were reviewed to extract data regarding diagnosis, comorbidities and operative procedures. The findings were compared with the data from clinical coding department and difference in the tariff was analysed. A re-audit was performed at Trust B after implementation of changes to assess improvement. Results. In the initial audit 111 patients were reviewed. Twenty-three percent patients had all data correctly coded. In the remaining 77%, some of the co-morbidities had been missed, e.g. UTI, anaemia and osteoporosis etc. 11.7% of operative procedures and 16.5% of fracture patterns were incorrectly coded resulting in loss of £53 000 over the 4 month period. Poor documentation and the use of ‘uncodable’ language by clinicians were responsible for missing co-morbidities, while inadequate medical knowledge of clinical coders resulted in the incorrect recording of operative procedures. We implemented changes in the form of clinical coders training, awareness of “codable words” by medical staff and writing the procedure codes by the surgeons themselves. A re-audit at Trust B showed an estimated savings of £18540.00 over 3 months period, demonstrating a significant improvement. Conclusion. Inaccuracies in clinical coding result in loss of tariff. Awareness of codable words, writing the operative codes by surgeons and training of clinical coders can improve clinical coding and payment by results in NHS hospitals

Background. The Targon FN plate is a combination of the sliding hip screw and multiple cancellous screws. It is used in the fixation of intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur. The aim of this prospective audit was to assess clinical and radiological outcomes of Targon FN. Method. All patients who had a Targon FN fixation over a period of 18 months at a district general hospital were included. A pro forma was completed using medical records, including x-ray images. Results. Thirty-five patients were identified. Median (IQR) age was 73 (57–82). Median (IQR) waiting time for surgery was 27 hours (17–51). Median (IQR) operating time was 58 (50–65) minutes. The patients were followed up at 6, 12 18 and 24 months. Three cases of avascular necrosis were reported and two cases of non-union. Seven cases were found where the Targon FN was not used correctly. No cases of implant failure were reported where the Targon FN was used according to manufacture guidelines. Five revision surgeries took place or were being planned for cases of avascular necrosis, non union and symptomatic hardware. One case was identified which would have been better treated with a hemiarthroplasty than Targon FN. Conclusion. We recommend that the Targon FN plate continue to be used in our department. The success rate of the implant could be improved by educational workshops in our department to ensure that all surgeons adhere strictly to the operating technique described by the manufacturer. We recommend continuing careful selection of patients for Targon FN and to continue a follow up to 24 months

Background and Aims:. In 2009 a combined clinic was formed by the orthopaedic Surgeons and Developmental Paediatricians in our hospital. The aim was to help improve the assessment and management of patients with Cerebral Palsy. Included in the assessment team, are the paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, the developmental paediatricians, physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Our aim was to audit the patients presenting to this clinic over a 15 month period to look at the demographic data, clinical severity and decisions taken for these patients. Methods:. We looked at patients seen in the clinic from January 2013 to March 2014. We recorded the age, gender and primary caregiver. We also recorded the reason for referral. Clinically we wanted to know the type and distribution of the CP, GMFCS score, attainment of milestones and type of schooling. We recorded underlying aetiologies and HIV status of the patients. Finally the access the patients had to physiotherapy and Occupational therapy. Results:. We saw 41 patients in total with 18 males and 23 females. The ages ranged from 5 months to 9 years (mean 4.9 years). 36 of 41 (88%) had spastic CP, 2 (5%) dystonic, 1 (2%) mixed and 2 (5%) were not recorded. Diplegic and hemiplegic predominated with 15 (37%) and 14 (34%) respectively, there were 6 (15%) quadriplegics, 1 double hemiplegic and 5 were not recorded. 13 (31%) of patients had birth asphyxia as an aetiology, 13 (31%) had brain anomalies, 9 (22%) were premature babies, the remaining 16% comprised HIV, post natal sepsis and injury. 38 (93%) were cared for by at least one parent and the remaining 3 (7%) were cared for by a grandparent. 39 (95%) had access to physiotherapy and 30 (73%) had access to occupational therapy. 21 (51%) had no access to appropriate schooling. 9 (22%) were known to be HIV positive. The recommended orthopaedic interventions were continued physiotherapy for 17 (41%) and botox in 22(54%). Discussion:. The combined clinic has highlighted the diverse nature of cerebral palsy and the challenges facing our patients. It is an invaluable tool in the goal directed management of complex cases

This paper will focus on the use and including a demonstration of Digital photography for the purpose of clinical documentation, audit, teaching and research. Digital photography is particularly suitable in upper & lower limb surgery because of the discrete regional anatomy and radiology. Digital images once created and stored do not deteriorate, unlike pictures or slides. Digital camera that uses a single floppy disc has an added advantage of simplicity and ease of storage. Pre-op, intra-op, and post-op images of patients undergoing hand surgery and treatment are easily documented with the camera. The information can be archived using commercially available filing software such as File MakerPro. The information can be retrieved at a later stage to be used in audit, teaching and research, with the images retained in their original, unmodified condition. Existing clinical, historical and teaching library slides, pictures or images can be archived to ensure the quality of the images do not deteriorate further, and for ease of retrieval and subsequent application. Archiving in this manner would require a slide scanner. The ease of file retrieval, reliability and accuracy of this imaging system has been tested using a minimum of 2000 patient files, using both PC and Macintosh systems, with no computer error and minimal operator errors found. The software used has “auto save” feature built in, hence computer “crash resistance.” The only limitation of the technology is the set up costs, and the resolution of the images. Fortunately, both these limitations are improving rapidly

An audit was carried out to assess the management of patients with fragility fractures in fracture clinic and primary care. NICE guidelines advise these patients require treatment for osteoporosis if 75 years or older, and a DEXA scan if below this age. Distal radius and proximal humeral fractures were identified in a retrospective review of letters from 10 fracture clinics. Current medication of all patients ≥ 75 years was accessed and DEXA scan requests identified for patients < 75 years. There were 69 fragility fractures: 53 distal radius and 16 proximal humerus. 4 letters (6%) mentioned fragility fracture and advised treatment and 3 (3%) correctly advised a DEXA scan. Only 3 of 25 (10%) patients ≥ 75yrs not previously on osteoporosis medication had treatment started by their GPs. 3 of a possible 29 (10%) patients < 75 years were referred for a DEXA scan. A text box highlighting fragility fractures and NICE guidelines was added to all clinic letters for patient ≥ 50 years old. Re-audits showed an improvement in management of these fractures, with 45% of patients ≥ 75 years being started on treatment and 39% of patients < 75 years being referred for a DEXA scan

We present a complete audit cycle of Emergency Department (ED) management of paediatric buckle fractures of the distal radius at Derriford Hospital. Local hospital management guidelines state that the limb should be supported in a wrist splint for 3 weeks following injury and, provided parents are adequately educated, no formal follow-up is required. Auditable standards were obtained from the local guidance. An initial audit cycle of 54 cases identified shortcomings in compliance with guidelines. These included: Inappropriate immobilisation in 34 (63%) cases, omission of written advice in 35 (65%) cases and arrangement of unnecessary follow-up in 31 (57%) cases. Following circulation of the results, ‘aide-memoir’ icons were added to the emergency department computer coding system, teaching sessions for emergency department staff were organised and new paediatric specific wrist splints were introduced. A re-audit of 33 patients evaluated the effect of the changes. This demonstrated a 27% improvement in correct wrist support usage (27/33, 82%) and 25% fewer unnecessary referrals to fracture clinic (27/33, 82%). Staff training and provision of appropriate wrist splints were crucial to improving the adherence to guidance. This resulted in standardisation of care, fewer unnecessary appointments for patients and cost savings to the hospital trust

Introduction

The use of intramedullary lengthening devices is becoming increasingly popular. There are no published data regarding the incidence of venous thromboembolism following intramedullary lengthening and no reports or guidance for current practices on use of thromboprophylaxis. Following a case of post-operative deep vein thrombosis in our institution, we felt that it is important to assess best practice. We conducted this survey to collect data that would describe current practice and help guide consensus for treatment.

Introduction. ‘VTE disease is the new MRSA’, with much attention received in the media and the political world. Following the 2010 NICE guidelines all patients admitted to hospital should have VTE prophylaxis considered and a formal VTE risk assessment done with documentation and review in a 24 hour period. We carried out a completed audit cycle to identify our adherence to these guidelines and introduced a novel method to ensure compliance. Materials/Methods. An audit of 400 patients admitted to the orthopaedic department was carried out with review of case notes. Three key parameters were investigated: Firstly the compliance of carrying out a risk assessment for VTE disease with correct documentation, secondly investigating how many patients got re-assessed in 24 hours and finally if patients received appropriate VTE prophylaxis. The data was re-audited following the introduction of a new drug chart with a box section for VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis on the chart itself. Results. In the first cycle VTE risk assessments were carried out in 2.5% with 0% having a re-assessment in 24 hours and 93.5% of patients having correctly prescribed VTE prophylaxis. Following the new drug charts, the risk assessments were carried out in 79%, re-assessment in 50% and correct prescribed prophylaxis in 99% of the patients. Conclusions. We recommend all hospitals should have a section in the drug chart itself for VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis as this greatly improves compliance to the NICE guidelines. This ensures optimal patient care and protects the trust from litigations

Aim: To identify the incidence of regular medication not being prescribed on initial admission of emergency surgical cases. Material and Method: The data for this audit was taken from all surgical admissions over an approximately one month period between December 2004 and January 2005. Prescribed drugs for each patient were checked the morning after admission. If the patient was unable to provide this information, we obtained their regular medication list from the GP. A total of 71 admissions were studied, 58% were referred from A& E, whereas 34% from the GP or primary care and a small percentage came from referrals from other wards within the hospital. Results: Out of the 71 admissions, 46 patients were receiving at least one regular medication. Obviously, some patients were on medications for more than one disease and these were looked at individually. From all 71 admissions, 21% of them had at least one error, i.e. at least one regular medication was not prescribed on admission. If there was a documented reason for the omission of a particular drug then this was not counted as an error. Analysing each co morbidity individually, 42% of IHD medication were not prescribed despite being taken on a regular basis by the patient, 33% for hypertensive and diabetic medication, 50% for asthmatic and psychiatric medication and 29% for medication for other less serious conditions. 81% of the errors made were on patients referred from A& E, while 15% where from patients received from the GP/primary care. Only 4% of the errors was made on patients referred from other wards. However, A& E referrals were almost double those of GPs. Hence, in a total of 41 A& E referrals 21 errors were made, while in a total of 24 GP referrals only 4 errors were made. Only 1 error was made in the total of 6 ward referrals. Conclusion and Discussion: The results of this audit are surprising and alarming. 21% of admissions had at least one regular medication not prescribed by the admitting doctors. Missing out on regular medication can have potentially life-threatening effects on patients as well as severe medico-legal implications. Most of the mistakes were being made with patients that are referred from the accident and emergency department. These patients are generally more unwell than the ones referred from the GP or primary care, and quite often are elderly patients on a multitude of drugs that are unable to remember some or all of their tablets. Patients admitted out of hours present an added difficulty in that GPs are not available for confirmation of the patient’s regular medication. So, more care and emphasis need to be given on drug history when admitting a patient

Cognitive impairment is common in patients with hip fracture both on admission and may develop later on. Reduced cognitive function is a risk factor for development of delirium, correlates with poor rehabilitation, and is an independent predictor of increased mortality. Despite its commonplace and potential for serious morbidity, cognitive dysfunction is often poorly assessed & diagnosed. Our aims were to 1) assess the practice of cognitive assessment on admission for hip fracture patients according to local guidelines and 2) ascertain whether it can be improved by the formal introduction of Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) & Clock Drawing Test (CDT) in the hip fracture admission proforma. A prospective audit was undertaken of cognitive assessment by either AMTS or CDT for 50 consecutive patients admitted with hip fracture from 4/8/2010. Subsequently, the hip fracture admission proforma was amended to include both the AMTS & CDT. A re-audit was performed on 50 consecutive patients admitted from 17/2/2011 to determine the change in practice. Patient demographics were comparable in both audit loops, with the mean age being equal (84 years) and an equal majority of female patients (76%). Cognitive assessment by either AMTS or CDT significant increased from 28% (n=14) to 86% (n=43) in the re-audit (p<0.0001). All AMTS were completed in accordance with instructions, whereas almost half of CDTs were incompletely or incorrectly filled out (45%). The assessment of cognitive function can be greatly improved by inclusion of both the AMTS & CDT to the hip fracture admission proforma, allowing the most appropriate multi-disciplinary care to be planned for the patient. Whilst both CDT and AMTS are good screening tools for cognitive impairment, many are unfamiliar with CDT & more training is needed

Introduction. Ottawa ankle rules originally described in 1992 have been shown to improve the pick-up rates of ankle fractures and avoid the need for unnecessary X-rays, thus minimising cost and radiation to the patient. We decided to carry out an audit at our hospital to look at the pick-up rates of ankle fractures and ways to minimise x-rays for the patient both in A&E and in the orthopaedic department. Methods. Ankle x-rays of 1088 trauma patients over a 7 month period from Dec 2009 to June 2010 (inclusive) were reviewed. Patients with ankle fractures were classified according to Weber type, and whether they were treated surgically or non-operatively. Non-operatively treated ankle fractures then formed the main sub-group of our study, looking at the number of follow-up X-rays and the amount of subsequent displacement. The amount of displacement was classified into non-displaced (0 mm), minimally displaced (<2mm) and displaced (>2 mm). Results. 171 patients (out of 1088) were found to have fractured their ankle giving a pick up rate of 16%. (cf a pickup rate of 26% described in literature with implementation of Ottawa rules). The pick up rate fluctuated each month from 31% in December to a meagre 6% fractures in June and this could be due to summertime sports injuries causing less fractures and more sprains. We noted a third more x-rays were ordered in Spring than Winter. There were no changes in junior staff in either the A&E or the orthopaedic department to account for the monthly variations. Conservatively managed fractures were followed up in the fracture clinic (n = 95, 56%) 16% (n = 11) of the conservatively managed patients were classified as Weber A fractures 84% (n=58) as Weber B fractures. No Weber C fractures were conservatively managed. Of the eleven Weber A fractures only one was minimally displaced. Conservatively managed Weber A fractures received an average of 1.36 x-rays on follow up in the Orthopaedic department. Of the Weber B fractures 42 were non-displaced whilst 16 were minimally displaced, and these received an average of 3.23 x-rays on follow up. None of these progressed to displacement > 2mm. Conclusion. Based on our audit, we have introduced a policy to limit the number of follow-up of X-rays for minimally displaced and undisplaced Weber A & B fractures to one. We have also re-emphasized the importance of Ottawa rule implementation in our A&E department

Aim: To audit the accuracy and efficacy of injections for subacromial impingement administered by our medical staff and specialist role physiotherapist. Methods: 49 patients presenting to the outpatient clinic with subacromial impingement agreed to take part in the study. They were allocated according to date of referral to either the consultant, the physiotherapist or registrar grade for injection via an anterior approach into the subacromial bursa. The therapeutic injection contained a specified volume of radiocontrast as well as depomedrone and lignocaine. Antero-posterior and scapula-Y radiographs were performed immediately after injection. The Constant shoulder score was evaluated before and at six weeks after injection and all radiographs were reviewed by an independent, blinded radiologist recording the position of contrast. Results: Accuracy rates of 67% through an anterior approach were obtained by both the consultant and the physiotherapist. At registrar level 48% accuracy was achieved. Improvement in shoulder score was obtained in 70% of patients with accurate injections, but additionally in 59% of patients with inaccurate injections. Only 7% of cases had contrast confined to the subacromial space; in the remainder, contrast tracked medially around the rotator cuff muscle bellies in 59%, gleno-humeral joint in 20% and within the cuff tendon in 16%. Conclusions: In our practice, the specialist physiotherapist already has an established role in administering therapeutic subacromial injections. Our audit demonstrates acceptable and equal accuracy to the consultant which we feel justifies this particular part of their role. However, at registrar grade the level of accuracy is reduced and most likely reflects inexperience, as over time accuracy improved. Interestingly, shoulder function scores have improved in over half of impingement patients with inaccurate injections which may reflect a generalised ‘field’ effect of steroid on the shoulder

Transferring patient data to the care of the oncoming team is the point at which the patient is most vulnerable on their journey through the healthcare system. Effective handover is vital to protect patient safety and has become increasingly more important after introduction of shift patterns for junior doctors following the implementation of the European Working Time Directive. The aim was to assess whether the introduction of a standardised proforma and traffic light system, would improve weekend handover of patients in our orthopaedic unit. Data was collected in the form of hand written data, for 3 months, in our department. This was analysed and a standardised handover sheet and traffic light system to highlight patient priority was introduced. Following a 1 week trial, the proformas were reviewed following feedback from colleagues. A re-audit was commenced and data collected for a further 2 months. There were 108 patients handed over on weekends during the re-audit compared to the 126 in the initial audit. The handover of patient data improved across all areas, with the most improved areas in recording the patients' diagnosis (58.4% to 94.4%) and noting the results of significant or pending investigations (61.2% to 91.7%). The traffic light system improved recording the patient's condition (8.5% to 81.5%) as well as logging the urgency or frequency of patient review (25.9% to 96.8%). Standardised proformas improve patient data transferred at handover and the traffic light system allows improved prioritisation of patients, thus improving patient safety at weekends

The 1995 Audit Commission report, “Setting the Record Straight- A study of hospital medical records,” criticised the poor standard of NHS record keeping. A retrospective audit of documentation of patients undergoing a closed manipulation of distal radius fractures (Colles type) in the Accident and Emergency department of the Queen Alexandra Hospital revealed that note keeping still needs to be improved. Only 15% of patients had adequate documentation

To evaluate the patient experience of patients referred to the ESP Orthopaedic Triage Service. To identify the demographic data of the patients. To evaluate patients' expectations and satisfaction of the service. A prospective audit of 50 new patients to the ESP service in Mountain Ash General Hospital and Prince Charles Hospital. The audit was carried out over a 3 month period between December 2008 and February 2009. Patients were asked to anonymously complete a survey following their appointment. Data was collated independently and analysed with descriptive statistics. Patients referred to ESP service. Self administered satisfaction survey. Mean age range 40-59 yrs (range 20 -70yrs). 50% >1 year duration of symptoms. 94% of patient's surveyed rated the service provided as good - excellent. 88% of patient's reported that they were happy to be assessed by the ESP. 96% of patients surveyed agreed they were able to discuss their treatment openly with only 10% preferring to see a Doctor. The ESP service in Cwm Taff Health board achieves a high level of patient satisfaction

Purpose. Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome (TTS) was first reported by Keck and Lam separately in 1962. It has been regarded as the lower limb equivalent to Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). The gold standard of diagnosis proposed over the years is nerve conduction study (NCS). In reality, TTS is much harder to diagnose and treat compared to CTS. Signs and symptoms can be mimicked by other foot and ankle conditions. Our unit had not seen a single positive nerve conduction result of TTS in clinically suspicious cases. We have therefore audited our 10 year experience. Methods and Results. This is a retrospective audit. Patient list retrieved from neurophysiology. 42 patients were identified. All were referred with a clinical suspicion of TTS. There was no single positive nerve conduction result showing tarsal tunnel compression. Of these, 27 case notes were retrieved (64%). The demographics are: A) age (23 to 78), B) 12 males, 15 females, and C) 12 involving left side, 4 right side and 11 bilateral. These studies were conducted according to national guidelines. There were 8 abnormal studies: 4 showing spinal radiculopathy, 3 showing higher peripheral neuropathy and 1 showing tibial nerve irritation following previous decompression. 4 cases were operated on. These are: 2 for removal of lumps, 1 for partial plantar fascia release, and 1 for redo-decompression. As for the rest: 16 had no change in the symptoms and were discharged, 6 were referred to other disciplines, 2 resolved spontaneously, 2 lost to follow up and 1 resolved after a total knee replacement. Conclusion. Our result does not reflect the findings reported in the literature in the past. Our neurophysiologist also agreed it is very rare to see one positive test. We feel that our understanding of TTS is not complete. The routine NCS done at resting position may not be able to replicate the clinical situations which bring on the symptoms in the first place. Changing lifestyle and improved footwear designs may also have contributed to a change in disease presentation. Further studies are required to clarify the situation

Presenters Position:. Purpose of Study:. To perform a retrospective audit of the spectrum of management of tibial pseudarthrosis by a single surgeon over a seven year time period. Description of Methods:. All discharge summaries and operation logs from 2004 to 2011 were reviewed to identify patients, and their case notes and x-rays were examined. Patients were contacted telephonically for follow-up examination. Summary of Results:. Eleven patients presented with pseudarthrosis or bowing of the tibia (six females, five males, age range 4 months–7 years). Three were being treated conservatively and two patients had undergone primary below-knee amputation for severe deformity and functional deficit. Six patients had undergone resection of the pseudarthrosis with intramedullary fixation with a Williams' rod. Three of these patients had Neurofibromatosis type 1. In all instances autogenous iliac crest bone graft was used. Fibular osteotomy was performed in five of these patients and the fibula was stabilised with a K-wire in four patients. All patients were discharged in an above knee cast. Mean follow-up from 1st surgery was 23.75 (1.5–72) months. In one patient, histology confirmed suspected fibrous dysplasia. One patient had had a revision procedure 12 months prior to last follow-up for re-fracture and rod displacement. Mean residual deformity was recorded as 4.2° (1° to 10°) valgus and 6.6° (−2° to 20°) anterior bowing. We had no instances of non-union or sepsis at latest follow-up in this small series. Conclusion:. Patients with tibial pseudarthrosis have a wide spectrum of presentation. Not every patient requires immediate surgery. Our treatment aim in the young patient is to maintain optimum ambulation, clinical union and alignment with radiographic appearance assuming secondary consideration. In our hands, internal fixation using a Williams' rod with autograft is safe and effective as the initial surgical procedure. Continued follow-up of these patients is mandatory as the risk of complications is high even after apparent union

Fractures of the neck of femur are common in the older adult with significant morbidity and mortality rates. This patient cohort is associated with frailty and multiple complex medical and social needs requiring a multidisciplinary team to provide optimal care. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes at 5 years following implementation of a collaborative service between the Orthopaedic and Geriatric departments of Southland Hospital in 2012.

Retrospective data was collected for patients aged 65 years and older who were admitted with a fragility hip fracture. Data was collated for 2011 (pre-implementation) and 2017 (post-implementation). Demographics and ASA scores were recorded. We assessed 30-day and 1-year mortality, surgical data, length of stay and complications.

There were 74 patient admissions in 2011 and 107 in 2017. Mean age at surgery was 84.2 years in 2011 and 82.6 years in 2017 (p>0.05). Between the 2011 and 2017 groups there has been a non-significant reduction in length of stay on the orthopaedic ward (9.8 days vs 7.5 days, p=0.138) but a significant reduction in length of stay on the rehabilitation ward (19.9 vs 9 days, p<0.001). There was a significant decrease in frequency of patients with a complication (71.6% vs 57%, p=0.045) and a marginal reduction in number of complications (p=0.057). Through logistic regression controlling for age, sex and ASA score, there was a reduction in the odds of having a complication by 12% between 2011 and 2017 (p<0.001). There was no difference in mortality between the groups.

The orthogeriatric model of care at Southland Hospital appears to have reduced both the frequency of complications and length of stay on the rehabilitation ward 5 years after its implementation. This is the first study in New Zealand demonstrating medium-term post-implementation follow-up of what is currently a nationally accepted standard model of care.

Aims: Secondary prevention in patients suffering neck of femur fractures is an effective but under utilised strategy in reducing subsequent fragility fractures. Published BOA guidelines recommend patients aged 75 or over with fragility fractures should receive bisphosphonates, falls risk assessment, and vitamin D supplements if there are concerns regarding deficiency. This audit aimed to determine the effectiveness of implementing secondary prevention strategies in patients admitted with neck of femur fractures. Methods: Patients aged 75 or above admitted to a local trauma unit with neck of femur fractures were identified over a two-year period. In-hospital mortality was recorded. Discharge letters for the remaining patients were obtained. Data was collected on whether patients were commenced on bisphosphonates and vitamin D supplements in hospital, or whether advice was given for these therapies to be initiated in the community. Patients undergoing falls risk assessment prior to discharge were also noted. Results: Overall 549 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eighty patients died during admission giving an in-hospital mortality rate of 14.6% per year. A further 238 patients were excluded due to missing data leaving 231 patients in the final study population. Mean age was 84.4 yr (range 75–97 yr) and 77.9% (n=180) were female. Bisphosphonate therapy was commenced or recommended in 22.9% (n=53), vitamin D supplements in 46.3% (n=107), and 16.5% (n=38) underwent falls risk assessment. Only 4.3% (n=10) were commenced on bisphosphonates and underwent falls risk assessment. Conclusions: Despite evidence that secondary prevention is effective in reducing subsequent fragility fractures our findings demonstrate these strategies are poorly implemented with less than one in twenty patients receiving the recommended falls assessment and antiresorptive therapy. A standardised discharge letter for patients with neck of femur fractures would provide more effective communication between hospitals and primary care thereby assisting the implementation of secondary prevention strategies

BACKGROUND: With the improvement of the ultrasound technology, there has been an increasing ability to image the soft tissues of the hand and wrist. This means structures such as tendon, ligaments and soft tissues can be visualized both statically and dynamically. AIM: The aim of our study was to audit the types of cases who have undergone ultrasound imaging in different hand conditions in last two years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 123 ultrasound and looked for its use in different hand and wrist conditions. These were categorized in different groups such as diagnostic, anatomical and therapeutical. RESULTS: In our 123 patients, 49 had lumps out of which 30 ganglions, 7 vascular, 4 glomus tumours, 2 granulomas, 4 neuromas, 1 lipomas and 1 sarcoma. In another 30 patients it was useful to diagnose tendon conditions such as inflammation, rupture, triggering. Furthermore, in 31 patients it was used for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. In addition, it was used for many miscellaneous conditions. DISCUSSION: Ultrasound is a useful tool for imaging of soft tissues in the hand. It can differentiate between solid and cystic swellings and can be used to aspirate and / or inject the later. It allows dynamic viewing thus making it an important tool in assessing complex tendon problems. We feel that it is a convenient, dependable and useful aid in diagnosing various hand conditions and should be available for widespread use

Approximately 20% of patients with ankle fracture sustain syndesmosis injury. This is most common in trans-syndesmotic (type B) and supra-syndesmotic (type C) fibula fractures. Intra-operative assessment of syndesmosis integrity is important because failure to treat these injuries can result in ankle instability and pain. Our aim was to audit the documentation of intra-operative testing of syndesmosis during ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). All patients who had ankle fracture ORIF between 1/1/2010 and 21/11/2011 were included. Pre-operative radiographs were reviewed and fractures were classified according to AO classification. Operation notes were reviewed for documentation of assessment of syndesmosis integrity. 153 patients, of mean age 50 years (15–93) were included. 60% (n=92) were female. In 78% of cases (n=119), an assessment of syndesmosis integrity was documented in the operation note. Of the patients with no documented syndesmosis assessment (n=35), the majority had type B fractures (n=34). One patient had a type C fracture. We have shown that 22% of patients undergoing ankle ORIF for fracture do not have documented assessment of syndesmosis integrity. We suggest that all patients who have ankle ORIF should have intra-operative assessment and documentation of syndesmosis integrity so these injuries are identified and treated accordingly

Health care facilities are major contributors of waste to landfills, with operating rooms estimated to assume 20–70% of this waste. With hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) on the rise, it is important to understand its environmental impact and identify areas for greening practices. Given its minimally-invasive nature, we hypothesise overall arthroscopic waste per FAI patient case to be approximately 5 kg, with minimal biohazard waste. The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of waste produced in FAI procedures and understand the environmental impact of the procedure to aid us in developing greening practices. A single surgeon waste audit (with descriptive statistics) of five FAI hip arthroscopy procedures – categorised by: 1) normal/landfill waste; 2) recyclable cardboards and plastics; 3) biohazard waste; 4) sharp items; 5) linens; and 6) sterile wrapping – was performed in April 2015. The surgical waste (except laundered linens) from the five FAI surgeries totalled 47.4 kg, of which 21.7 kg (45.7%) was biohazard waste, 11.7 kg (24.6%) was sterile wrap, 6.4 kg (13.5%) was normal/landfill waste, 6.4 kg (13.5%) was recyclable plastics, and 1.2 kg (2.6%) was sharp items. There was an average of 9.4 kg (excluding laundered linens) of waste produced per procedure. Considerable waste, specifically biohazard waste, is produced in FAI procedures with an average of 9.4 kg of waste produced per procedure, including 4.3 kg of biohazard waste. In Canada (population 35.7 million), approximately 18 800 kg of waste (8600 kg of biohazard waste) is produced from an estimated 2000 FAI procedures performed every year. Additional recycling programs, reducing surgical overage, and continued adherence to proper waste segregation will be helpful in reducing waste production and its environmental burden. An emphasis on “green outcomes” is also required to demonstrate environmental responsibility and effectively manage and allocate finite resources

Implementation of the World Health Organisation checklists have reduced errors, however, the impact of pre-operative briefings on adverse events has not been assessed. A prospective case control study assessing the association between pre-operative briefings and minor, potentially major and major adverse events was performed in two phases. Phase one involved prospective data collection for trauma and orthopaedic lists over 2 weeks. Changes were implemented and following this, the study was repeated (phase two). 41 lists were audited during phase one and 47 lists in phase two. Adequate pre-operative briefings were performed in 10/41 lists (24%) in phase one. There was a significant association between the occurrences of intra-operative adverse events (n=37) when a briefing was not performed (p=<0.01), and when a briefing was performed incompletely (p=0.01). In phase two, after staff re-education and policy change, briefings were found to be adequate in 38/47 lists (81%) with the occurrence of only three minor adverse events. Team familiarity also improved significantly (p=0.02). Inadequate pre-operative briefings are associated with increased minor adverse events and are detrimental to team familiarity. On the basis of our findings we recommend that all surgical units perform pre-operative briefings