Abstract
Background
The approach to Intramedullary (IM) fixation of long bone fractures remains a controversial issue. Early reports demonstrated less favourable results of retrograde nailing as compared with antegrade options due to higher non-union rates. The aim of this audit was to evaluate the outcomes of practice within the Trauma and Orthopaedic department with relation to IM nail fixation of diaphyseal femur fractures.
Methodology
The Trauma database between February 2010 and September 2013 was used to identify all femur IM nailing procedures. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) software was used to classify the fractures according to the Muller AO classification. All 3–2 (Diaphyseal femur fractures) were included in the audit. PACS imaging together with outpatient documentation was evaluated for radiological and clinical outcome.
Results
A total sample size of 23 patients was identified (13 antegrade vs. 10 retrograde approach fixations). Mean patient age was 67 years and male to female ratios were similar (11M vs. 12F). Antegrade nailing was performed in a younger population as compared to retrograde nailing (mean age 60 vs. 73 respectively). Mean time to union was somewhat more protracted in the retrograde group (7 vs. 5 months), although all fractures united. The most common complication with relation to antegrade nailing was due to distal locking screws backing out. I case of infection was reported in the retrograde nail group, which was treated successfully with antibiotic therapy. There were 2 cases of nonunion observed in the antegrade group.
Conclusions
The results of our practice were comparable to those published in recent literature. Overall, union rates for the two groups of fixation were similar. Each fixation technique is associated with its own specific set of complications. As a general rule antegrade nailing was reserved for a younger population so as to prevent trauma to the native knee joint.
