Purpose. We aimed to investigate whether the anterior superior iliac spine could provide consistent rotational landmark of the tibial component during mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using computed tomography (CT). Methods. During sagittal tibial resection, we utilized the ASIS as a rotational landmark. In 47 knees that underwent postoperative CT scans after medial UKA, the tibial component position was assessed by drawing a line tangential to the lateral wall of the tibial component. Rotation of the tibial component was measured using two reference lines: a line perpendicular to the posterior cortical rim of the tibia (angle α) and Akagi's line (angle β). Instant bearing position and posterior cruciate ligament fossa involvement were also evaluated. External rotation of the tibial component relative to each reference line and external rotation of the bearing relative to the lateral wall of the tibial component were considered positive values. Results. The mean angle α and β were 8.0 ± 6.1° (range, −4.0 – 24.3) and 8.7 ± 4.8° (range, 1.9 – 25.2), respectively. The mean instant bearing position was 4.3 ± 28.6° (range, −52.9 – 179.7). One bearing showed complete 180° rotation at 2 weeks postoperatively. Fourteen knees (29.8%) showed posterior cruciate ligament fossa involvement of the tibial resection margin. Conclusions. Due to the wide variation in, and inherent difficulty in identification of, the ASIS during the operation, it is not recommended for guidance of sagittal tibial resection during mobile-bearing medial UKA. Level of Evidence: Level IV

Introduction. Malrotation of the tibial component would lead to various complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) such as improper joint kinematics, patellofemoral instability, or excessive wear of polyethylene. However, despite reports of internal rotation of the tibial component being associated with more severe pain or stiffness than external rotation, the biomechanical reasons remain largely unknown. In this study, we used a musculoskeletal computer model to simulate a squat (0°–130°–0° flexion) and analyzed the effects of malrotated tibial component on lateral and medial collateral ligament (LCL and MCL) tensions, tibiofemoral and patellofemoral contact stresses, during the weight-bearing deep knee flexion. Materials and Methods. A musculoskeletal model, replicating the dynamic quadriceps-driven weight-bearing knee flexion in previous cadaver studies, was simulated with a posterior cruciate-retaining TKA. The model included tibiofemoral and patellofemoral contact, passive soft tissue and active muscle elements. The soft tissues were modeled as nonlinear springs using previously reported stiffness parameters, and the bony attachments were also scaled to some cadaver reports. The neutral rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components was aligned according to the femoral epicondylar axis and the tibial anteroposterior axis, respectively. Knee kinematics and ligament tensions were computed during a squat for malrotated conditions of the tibial component. The tibial rotational alignments were changed from 15° external rotation to 15° internal rotation in 5° increments. The MCL and LCL tensions, the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral contact stresses were compared among the knees with different rotational alignment. Results. For the MCL, the neutral rotated tibial components caused a maximum tension of 67.3 N. However, the 15° internally rotated tibial components increased tensions to 285.2N as a maximum tension [Fig.1]. By contrast, with external rotation of the tibial component, the MCL tensions increased only a small amount. The LCL tension also increased but up to less than half of the MCL value [Fig.2]. The tibiofemoral and patellofemoral contact stresses increased because of a decreased contact area [Fig.3]. Discussion and Conclusion: In this computer simulation, excessive internal rotation in the tibial component increased MCL tensions and patellofemoral and tibiofemoral contact stresses. The current study suggests that increased MCL tensions and patellofemoral and tibiofemoral contact stresses caused by a malrotated tibial component could be one cause of patient complaints and polyethylene problems after TKA

Purpose. To achieve 3D kinematic analysis of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 2D/3D registration techniques, which use X-ray fluoroscopic images and computer aided design model of the knee implants, have been applied to clinical cases. However, most conventional methods have needed time-consuming and labor-intensive manual operations in some process. In particular, for the 3D pose estimation of tibial component model from X-ray images, these manual operations were carefully performed because the pose estimation of symmetrical tibial component get severe local minima rather than that of unsymmetrical femoral component. In this study, therefore, we propose an automated 3D kinematic estimation method of tibial component based on statistical motion model, which is created from previous analyzed 3D kinematic data of TKA. Methods. The used 2D/3D registration technique is based on a robust feature-based (contour-based) algorithm. In our proposed method, a statistical motion model which represents average and variability of joint motion is incorporated into the robust feature-based algorithm, particularly for the pose estimation of tibial component. The statistical motion model is created from previous a lot of analyzed 3D kinematic data of TKA. In this study, a statistical motion model for relative knee motion of the tibial component with respect to the femoral component was created and utilized. Fig. 1 shows each relative knee motion model for six degree of freedom (three translations and three rotations parameter). Thus, after the pose estimation of the femoral component model, 3D pose of the tibial component model is determined by maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation using the new cost function introduced the statistical motion model. Experimental results. To validate the feasibility and effectiveness of 3D pose estimation for the tibial component using the proposed method, experiments using X-ray fluoroscopic images of 20 TKA patients under the squatting knee motion were performed. For the creation of correct pose (reference data) and the statistical motion model, we used the 3D pose data which were got by carefully applying previous method to the contour images which spurious edges and noises were removed manually. In order to ensure the validity for the statistical motion model of the proposed method, leave-one-out cross validation method was applied. In the 3D pose estimation of tibial component model, for the only first frame, initial guess pose of the model was manually given. For all images except for the first frame, the 3D pose of the model was automatically estimated without manual initial guess pose of the model. To assess the automation performance, the automation rate was calculated, and the rate was defined as the X-ray frame number of satisfying clinical required accuracy (error within 1mm, 1 degree) relative to all X-ray frame number. As results of the experiments, 3D pose of the tibial component model for all X-ray images except for the first frame was full-automatically stably-estimated, and the automation rate was 80.1 %. Conclusions. The proposed method by MAP estimation introduced the statistical motion model was successfully performed, and did not need labor-intensive manual operations for 3D pose estimation of tibial component. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Objectives. All Polyethylene Tibial components in Total Knee Arthroplasty have been in use for some years, studies showing equivalent results to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with metal-backed Tibial components at 10 years have shown no significant difference between the two on radiostereometric analysis and revision rates[1]. Post operative patient outcome data using standard metal-backed Tibial components is widely reported in the literature. This study is looking at patient outcomes following All-polyethylene tibial component TKA. We hypothesize that using standard patient outcome measures, an improvement comparable with that expected for metal-backed tibial component TKA will be shown with All-polyethylene tibial component TKA. Methods. Between August 2006 and August 2008, 229 all-polyethylene tibial component TKA were implanted at the elective orthopedic unit. The choice of implant was entirely dependent on surgeon's preference. Of the 229 patient's, 225 details were available for review, 27 did not wish to take part in the study and 1 patient died a year following surgery of an unrelated illness. The remaining 197 patients agreed to take part in the study. The patient's were contacted either in person or over the telephone and asked to completed questionnaires for standard knee scoring. These included: the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the WOMAC Score and the SF-12 Score, both pre-operatively and post operatively. Results. All three Scoring systems used showed an overall improvement post-operatively, as would be reasonably be expected. The results for the OKS, WOMAC and SF-12 all showed an improvement comparable with that expected for metal-backed tibial component TKA. Conclusions. Total Knee Arthroplasty using an all-polyethylene tibial component has been shown with these early results to be a reasonable alternative to metal-backed options offering some advantages. [1,2]

Background. Total knee prostheses are continually being redesigned to improve performance, longevity and closer mimic kinematics of the native knee. Despite continued improvements, all knee implants even those with proven design features, have failures. We identified a cohort of patients with isolated tibial component failures that occurred in a popular and successful knee system. Our purpose was to (1) characterize the observed radiographic failure pattern; (2) investigate the biologic response that may contribute to the failure; and (3) to determine if the failure mechanism was of a biological or a mechanical nature. Methods. Twenty-one knees from 19 patients met the inclusion criteria of having isolated tibial component failure in a commonly used knee implant system. Radiographs from the primary and revision knee surgery were analyzed for implant positioning and failure pattern, respectively. Inflammatory biomarkers IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were available in 16/21 knees and peripheral CD14. +. /16. +. monocytes were measured in 10 of the above mentioned 16 knee revisions. Additionally, white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured to rule out infection as the cause of the cytokine upregulation. Results. Radiograph findings demonstrated that all of the 21 tibial components were implanted in either neutral or 2–3° varus position, none of the revisions were implanted in valgus (figure 1). All tibias showed obvious radiographic loosening and failed into varus. The inflammatory biomarkers IL-1b, IL-6, & TNF-a were negative. WBC, ESR, CRP were normal. Peripheral CD14+/16+ and total CD16+ monocytesmeasurements were consistent with previous findings of patients with osteoarthritis (figure 2). Conclusions. The findings supported a mechanical failure mechanism rather than that of a wear debris induced inflammatory pattern. The loosening, collapse and debonding from the cement may have been related to the implantation technique, stresses due to rotational freedom of the implant, or patient characteristics/behavior. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. Tibial component malrotation is one of the commonest causes of pain and stiffness following total knee arthroplasties, however, the assessment of tibial component malrotation on imaging is not a clear-cut. Aim. The objective of this study was to assess tibial component rotation in cases with pain following total knee replacement using MRI with metal artifact reduction technique. Methods. In 35 consecutive patients presented to our clinic between January 2016 and April 2017 with persistent unexplained moderate to severe pain for at least 6 months following total knee arthroplasties after exclusion of infection, MRI evaluation of tibial component rotation using O-MAR technique-(Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic implants) to improve visualization of soft tissue and bone by reducing artifacts caused by metal implants- was done according to the technique of Berger et al. Results. 25 cases showed internal rotation of tibial component, 5 cases showed neutral rotation, 5 cases showed external rotation with presence of abnormal intraarticular fibrous bands. Conclusion. Two main conclusions are obtained from this study:. Firstly: Internal rotation of tibial component must be excluded in all cases of persistent pain following total knee replacement. Secondly: Magnetic resonance imaging with the newly developed metal artifact reduction techniques is a very useful tool in evaluating cases of unexplained pain following total knee replacement

[Introduction]. One of the modern design total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system, the NexGen Legacy posterior-stabilized (LPS) Flex prosthesis, has been in use at our hospital since 2001. Between 2006 and 2011, NexGen LPS-Flex primary TKA were mainly performed in combination with a cemented short-keeled minimally invasive version tibial tray (MIS tibial component) instead of the traditional NexGen stemmed tibial tray. We observed some cases required early revision of isolated tibial component in primary TKA performed in this period. Therefore, our objectives were to report the series of this revision cases and to consider this failure mechanism. [Patients & Methods]. A total of 526 primary TKAs were performed using a NexGen LPS-Flex prosthesis and MIS tibial component during five-year period at our hospital. The mean age was 74 years at the time of the index procedure. We assessed revision rate of this tibial tray in this study and described clinical course of the revision cases. We also examined the clinical and radiographic features which could be associated with the failure. [Results]. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.5 years and there were 13 knees received tibial component revision during this period. Twelve knees were diagnosed with osteoarthritis and one knee with rheumatoid arthritis. The duration between primary TKA and revision averaged at 3.3 years, and the mean age at the second procedure was 67 years. TKAs were performed without applying the tibial central extension stem in all 13 knees, and thick polyethylene insert like 17 or 20 mm were selected for seven and 14 mm for five of 13 knees, that were the typical features on the primary TKA. Postoperative course of all 13 cases was uneventful and 10 of 13 knees achieved deep knee flexion over at 125 degrees. Prerevision radiographs showed characteristic pattern with tibial tray debonding at the cement-implant interface and subsidence into varus and flexion in all 13 knees. In all cases, intraoperative findings revealed a grossly loose tibial component with most of the cement mantle still attached to the bone. No case exhibited signs of macroscopic polyethylene wear and femoral component loosening. [Discussion]. The most common reason for failure of TKA is infection followed by implant loosening, polyethylene wear, and instability. Several studies document survival rates of over 90% up to 20 years with modern TKA designs using a cemented stemmed tibial component. Although failure of the tibial component was more prevalent in some early TKA designs, in recent years, failure of tibial fixation has been a rare cause of revision. Our experience with early aseptic loosening of this tibial component has suggested the low-profile design with no central stem as a cause for accelerated failure. Furthermore, other factors associated with increased this failure could include a thicker insert and postoperative achievement of high flexion

Purpose. Medial tibial condylar fractures (MTCFs) are rare but a serious complication after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The reasons for MTCFs was thought to be associated with the surgical procedures that are the halls for the guide pins, extended cut of the posterior tibial cortex, an incorrect positioning of the tibial keel groove, and an excessive force application when placing the tibial component. However, the relationship between MTCFs and the alignment of the tibial component has not been proven. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of the tibial component alignment to the MTCFs using the finite element method (FEM). Materials and Methods. We used three-dimensional (3D) image model of the tibia (Sawbones: Washington, US) on the FEM analysis software (ANSYS Design Space ver. 12, Tokyo, Japan). We measured the bone stresses in the 3D image model of the tibia at the site of the medial metaphyseal cortex and the anterior/posterior cortex. The tibial component was placed 0°, 3°varus, 3°valgus, 6°varus, and 6° valgus relative to the tibial anatomical axis in the coronal plane (Figure 1). In sagittal plane, tibial component was positioned 7° posterior inclination relative to the tibial anatomical axis. And, making an additional vertical groove at the posterior cortex by the extended sagittal saw cut of 2° and 10° posterior inclination, the impact of posterior cortical bone stress was evaluated (Figure 2). A load of 900 N was applied to the center of the tibial component parallel to the tibial axis, the maximum bone stress was subsequently calculated. Furthermore, to evaluate the stress distribution, we calculated the bone mass of the 3D bone model below the tibia component under the various alignment of the tibial component (Figure 3). Results. The bone stress at the medial metaphyseal cortex and the anterior cortex did not change depending on the alignment of the tibial component (Figure 4). When the tibial component was placed varus, the bone stress at the posteiror cortex decreased. By contrast, the valgus position of the tibial component increased the bone stress. An extended sagittal saw cut increased the bone stress depending on the depth of the groove. The bone mass of the tibia below the tibial component decreased as positioning the tibial component valgus. Conclusions. Surgeons should be aware of the potential pitfalls of valgus alignemnt of the tibial component and an extended sagittal saw cut, because this can lead to increased risk of the MTCFs

Tibial component loosening is an important failure mode in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) which may be due to the 6–8 mm of bone resection required or the limited surface area. To address component loosening and fixation, a new Early Intervention (EI) design is proposed which reverses the traditional material scheme between femoral and tibial components. That is, the EI design consists of a plastic inlay component for the distal femur and a thin metal plate for the proximal tibia. With this reversed materials scheme, the EI design requires minimal tibial bone resection compared to traditional UKA to preserve the dense and stiff bone in the proximal tibia. This study investigated, by means of finite element (FE) simulations, the potential advantages of a thin metal tibial component compared with traditional UKA tibial components, such as an all-plastic inlay or a metal-backed onlay. We hypothesized that an EI component would produce comparable stress, strain, and strain energy density characteristics to an intact knee and more favorable values than UKA components. Indeed, the finite element results showed that an EI design reduced stresses, strains and strain energy density in the underlying support bone compared to an all-plastic UKA component. Analyzed parameters were similar for an EI and a metal-backed onlay, but the EI component had the advantage of minimal resection of the stiffest bone

Introduction. Stiffness postTotal Knee Replacement (TKR) is a common, complex and multifactorial problem. Many reports claim that component mal-rotation plays an important role in this problem. Internal mal-rotation of the tibial component is underestimated among surgeons when compared to femoral internal mal-rotation. We believe the internal mal- rotation of thetibial component can negatively affect the full extension of Knee. We performed an in-vivo study of the impact of tibial internal mal-rotation on knee extension in 31 cases. Method. During TKR, once all bony cuts were completed and flexion/extension gaps balanced, we assessed the degree of knee extension using the trial component in the setting of normaltibial rotation and with varying degrees of internal rotation (13–33°, mean 21.2±4.6°). Intra-operative lateral knee X-ray was done to measure the degree of flexion contracture in both groups. We also compared the degree of flexion contracture between CR and PS spacers. Results. The average degree of knee flexion contracture with normal rotation of the tibial component was 0.7±4.1° (range:-9 to 10), whereas after tibial internal rotation was 7.3±4.6° (range:-1 to 23)(P – value:0.001). The increase in the flexion contracture deformity was higher with PS spacer (7.18±2.61) than with CR spacers (5.22±2.05). Conclusion. The internal mal-rotation of the tibial component limits the ability of the tibia to externally rotate on the femur, thereby limiting full knee extension and leading to flexion contracture

It is very important for implanting tibial component to prevent bearing dislocation in Oxford UKA. One of the keys is accurate rotational position of tibia. But the problem remains what is accurate rotation of tibia in UKA. Oxford Signature decided the rotation of tibia component from MRI images. We measured the component rotation of tibia using CT after operation. Patients and Methods. 14 patients were operated by Oxford Signature and 11 patients were operated by Microplasty method. Patients were examined by CT 2 or 3 weeks later after operation. We compared component axis of tibia and A-P axis by best fit circle, Akagi's line. Results. In Oxford Signature group, component angle were 7.1 degree external rotation compared with A-P axis by best fit circle and were 3.6 degree external rotation compared with Akagi's line. In Microplasty group, component angle were 8.1 degree external rotation compared with A-P axis by best fit circle and were 3.8 degree external rotation compared with Akagi's line. Discussion. It is difficult to decide accurate position of tibial component for UKA. The A-P axis by best fit circle and Akagi's line are reliable methods for tibial axis in TKA. We examined component axis of Signature Oxford and Microplasty, these were same tendency toward external rotation

Introduction. Stiffness post Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a common, complex and multifactorial problem. Many reports claim that component mal-rotation plays an important role in this problem. Internal mal-rotation of the tibial component is underestimated among surgeons when compared to femoral internal mal-rotation. We believe the internal mal-rotation of the tibial component can negatively affect the full extension of Knee. We performed an in-vivo study of the impact of tibial internal mal-rotation on knee extension in 31 cases. Method. During TKR, once all bony cuts were completed and flexion/extension gaps balanced, we assessed the degree of knee extension using the trial component in the setting of normal tibial rotation and with varying degrees of internal rotation (13–33°, mean 21.2±4.6°). Intra-operative lateral knee X-ray was done to measure the degree of flexion contracture in both groups. We also compared the degree of flexion contracture between CR and PS spacers. Results. The average degree of knee flexion contracture with normal rotation of the tibial component was 0.7±4.1° (range: −9 to 10), whereas after tibial internal rotation was 7.3±4.6° (range: −1 to 23) (P – value:0.001). The increase in the flexion contracture deformity was higher with PS spacer (7.18±2.61) than with CR spacers (5.22±2.05). Conclusion. The internal mal-rotation of the tibial component limits the ability of the tibia to externally rotate on the femur, thereby limiting full knee extension and leading to flexion contracture

Background. Several studies have reported that tibial component in varus alignment can worsen the survivorship of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). On the other hand, Varus/valgus inclination of the tibial component can affect the location of the contact point between femoral and tibial component especially in round on flat bearing surface design. Along with the tibial component inclination, changes in the contact point may also alter the tibial condylar bone stress, which would affect the longevity or complications after UKA. Method. We constructed a validated three-dimensional finite element model of the tibia with a medial component and assessed stress concentrations by changing the tibial component coronal inclinations (squale inclination, 3° and 6° varus, 3° and 6° valgus inclination). We evaluated the Von Mises stress on the medial tibial metaphyseal cortex and the proximal resected surface when a load of 900N was applied on the tibial component surface by two conditions in each inclination models; one is that the loading site is fixed at the mediolateral center of the tibial component (fixed model), and the other is that the loading site is variable depending on the tibial component inclination (variable model) (Fig.1). Result. In variable models, the loading site moved medially 22.8% of the tibial component width as the tibial component inclination changed from 6°varus to 6°valgus. The Von Mises stress concentrations were observed on the medial tibial metaphyseal cortices and on the anterior and posterior corner of the resected surface in all models (Fig.2). Stress concentration was also observed along the medial cortical rim of the resected surface in valgus tibial component inclination of the fixed model and varus inclination of the variable model (Fig.2). The stress on the medial tibial metaphyseal cortices did not markedly change in any inclination of fixed models, but increased in variable models as the tibial component inclination changed from varus to valgus (Fig.3A). The stress on the medial cortical rim of the resected surface increased with varus inclination in the fixed model and decreased with varus inclination in the variable model (Fig.3B). Changes in the Von Mises stress on the anterior and posterior corner of the resected surfaces did not differ between the fixed and variable model. Discussion. Varus inclination of the tibial component has been considered to increase the bone stress in previous studies. However, in the current study, bone stress on the medial metaphyseal cortex and the medial cortical rim of the resected surface conversely decreased in varus inclination when the change of the femorotibial contact point was taken into consideration. Recent opinion has advocated that restoring the constitutive patient's anatomy by compensating cartilage wear is critical in producing the excellent clinical outcome after UKA. Therefore, three to five degrees of anatomical varus inclination of the tibial component would reduce the tibial condylar bone stress and protective against complications such as unknown postoperative pain or tibial component migration. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

There are basically 4 ways advocated to determine the proper femoral component rotation during TKA: (1) The Trans-epicondylar Axis, (2) Perpendicular to the “Whiteside Line,” (3) Three to five degrees of external rotation off the posterior condyles, and (4) Rotation of the component to a point where there is a balanced symmetric flexion gap. This last method is the most logical and functionally, the most appropriate. Of interest is the fact that the other 3 methods often yield flexion gap symmetry, but the surgeon should not be wed to any one of these individual methods at the expense of an unbalanced knee in flexion. In correcting a varus knee, the knee is balanced first in extension by the appropriate medial release and then balanced in flexion by the appropriate rotation of the femoral component. In correcting a valgus knee, the knee can be balanced first in flexion by the femoral component rotation since balancing in extension almost never involves release of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) but rather release of the lateral retinaculum. If a rare LCL release is anticipated for extension balancing, then it would be performed prior to determining the femoral rotation since the release may open up the lateral flexion gap to a point where even more femoral component rotation is needed to close down that lateral gap. It is important to know and accept the fact that some knees will require internal rotation of the femoral component to yield flexion gap symmetry. The classic example of this is a knee that has previously undergone a valgus tibial osteotomy that has led to a valgus tibial joint line. In such a case, if any of the first 3 methods described above is utilised for femoral component rotation, it will lead to a knee that is very unbalanced in flexion being much tighter laterally than medially. A LCL release to open the lateral gap will be needed, increasing the complexity of the case. My experience has shown that intentional internal rotation of the femoral component when required is well-tolerated and rarely causes problems with patellar tracking. It is also of interest to note that mathematical calculations reveal that internally rotating a femoral component as much as 4 degrees will displace the trochlear groove no more that 2–3 mm (depending on the FC size), an amount easily compensated for by undersizing the patellar component and shifting it medially those few mm. There are basically 3 ways to determine the proper tibial component rotation during TKA: (1) Anatomically cap the tibial cut surface with an asymmetric tibial component, (2) Align the tibial rotation relative to a fixed anatomic tibial landmark (most surgeons use this method and align relative to the medial aspect of the tibial tubercle), (3) Rotate the tibial component to a point where there is rotational congruency in extension between the femoral and tibial articulating surfaces. This third method must be used with fixed bearing arthroplasties (especially with conforming articulations) to avoid rotational incongruency between the components during weight-bearing that can create abnormal and deleterious torsional forces on posterior stabilised posts, insert tray interfaces and bone-cement interfaces. Rotating platform articulations can tolerate rotational mismatch unless it is to a point where the polyethylene insert rotates excessively and causes symptomatic soft tissue impingement

Rotational malalignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may lead to several complications. Transepicondylar axis has been accepted for a reference of femoral rotation. In contrast, standard reference of tibial rotation remains controversial. Currently, two techniques are widely used, the anatomical landmarks technique and the range-of-movement (ROM) technique. Fifty-one patients underwent posterior-stabilized TKA with center-post self-align ROM technique for tibial component placement. Laurin view radiograph and computer tomography (CT) were used to assess the prosthetic position. The rotational mismatch between tibial and femoral components was 2.00° ± 0.34° (range, 0.1°-5.8°). All TKA showed a tibiofemoral mismatch within 10° (range, 0.1° −5.8°). Intraoperative evaluation of patellar tracking by no-thumb test and the Laurin view showed normal range in 90%. We concluded that tibial component placement with center-post self-align technique in PS-TKA can produce good patellar tracking with acceptable range of tibiofemoral mismatch

The anterior curve of the tibial plateau cortex represents a realiable and reproducible landmark which may help aligning the tibial component with the femoral component and the extensor mechanism. Few studies analyzed the tibial component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty. Malrotation can affect both patello-femoral and tibio-femoral postoperative function. We evaluated the rotational relationship between femur and tibia, and we investigated which tibial landmark consistently matches the rotation of the femoral epicondylar axis in full extension (Fig 1). Axial magnetic resonance images of 124 normal knees (statistical power 1-beta=0.8) were analyzed separately by three authors. Scanograms were obtained with the knee in full extension and with the long axis of the foot (second metatarsal bone) aligned on the neutral sagittal plane. The surgical epicondylar axis was drawn and projected over the proximal tibia and tibial tuberosity slices. Multiple anatomical tibial rotational landmarks were drawn and symmetric tibial component digital templates of different sizes were aligned according to each landmark. Alignment of the virtual tibial components was then compared to that of the projected femoral epicondylar axis (Fig 2). The best antero-posterior line to achieve rotational matching between the components was drawn on the proximal tibia slice of each patient. Results of rotation (positive = external rotation, negative = internal) relative to the epicondylar axis were (Fig 3): (a) Medial third-to the middle third of the tibial tubercle 1.2°+/−5.7, (b) Akagi's line (centre of the posterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion to the most medial part of the tibial tubercle) -11.5+/−6.5, (c) The anterior curved tibial plateau cortex (curve-on-curve matching between the tibial template and the anterior cortex) 1.0+/−2.9. Intraclass correlation coefficient resulted 0.923, 0,881, and 0.949 for the Akagi's line, Middle third of tibial tubercle, and the curve-on-curve reference respectively. The anterior curve of the tibial plateau cortex represents a realiable and reproducible landmark which may help aligning the tibial component with the femoral component and the extensor mechanism (Fig 4, 5)

Background. Although early TKA designs were symmetrical, during the past two decades TKA have been designed to include asymmetry, pertaining to either the trochlear groove, femoral condylar shapes or the tibial component. More recently, a new TKA was designed to include symmetry in all areas of the design, in the hopes of reducing design and inventory costs. Objective. The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with this symmetrical TKA during a weight-bearing deep knee bend activity. Methods. In vivo deep knee bend (DKB) kinematics for 21 subjects implanted with symmetrical posterior cruciate sacrificing (PCS) fixed bearing TKA were obtained using fluoroscopy. A 3D-to-2D registration technique was used to determine each subjects anteroposterior translation of lateral (LAP) and medial (MAP) femoral condyles and tibiofemoral axial rotation and their weight-bearing knee flexion. Results. During the DKB, the average maximum weight-bearing flexion was 111.7° ± 13.3°. On average, from full extension to maximum knee flexion, subjects experienced 2.5 mm ± 2.0 mm femoral rollback on lateral condyle −2.5 mm ± 2.2 mm of medial condyle motion in the anterior direction (Figure 1). This medial condyle motion was consistent for the majority of the subjects with the lateral condyle exhibiting rollback from 0° to 60° of flexion and then an average anterior slide of 0.3 mm from 60° to 90° of flexion. On average, the subjects in this study experienced 6.6° ± 3.3° of axial rotation, with most of rotation occurring in early flexion, averaging 4.9° (Figure 2). Discussion. Although subjects in this study were implanted with a symmetrical TKA, they did experience femoral rollback of the lateral condyle and positive axial rotation. Both of these kinematic parameters were normal-like in pattern, compared to the normal knee in early flexion, but in deeper flexion the pattern of motion varied from the normal knee. Also, the magnitude of posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation revealed similarities to previous fluoroscopy studies on subjects implanted with an asymmetrical TKA design. This was only a single surgeon study, so it is unclear if the results are TKA or surgeon influenced. Therefore, it is proposed that more patients be analyzed having this TKA implanted by other surgeons. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

INTRODUCTION. Cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely accepted treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. During this procedure, the surgeon targets proper alignment of the leg and balanced flexion/extension gaps. However, the cement layer may impact the placement of the component, leading to changes in the mechanical alignment and gap size. The goal of the study was to assess the impact of cement layer on the tibial mechanical alignment and joint gap during cemented TKA. MATERIAL. Computer-assisted TKAs (ExactechGPS®, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR) were performed by two fellowship trained orthorpaedic surgeons on five fresh-frozen non-arthritic pelvis-to-ankle cadaver legs. All the surgeries used a cemented cruciate retaining system (Optetrak Logic CR, Exactech, Gainesville, FL). After the bony resection, the proximal tibial resection plane was acquired by manually pressing an instrumented checker onto the resected tibial surface (resection plane). Once the prosthesis was implanted through standard cementing techniques, the top surface of the implanted tibial component was probed and recorded using an instrumented probe. A best fit plane was then calculated from the probed points and offset by the thickness of the prosthesis, representing the bottom plane of the component (component plane). The deviation of component alignment caused by the cement layer was calculated as the coronal and sagittal projection of the three-dimensional angle between the resection plane and the component plane. The deviation of the component height, reflecting a change in the joint gap, was assessed as the distance between the two planes calculated at the lowest points on the medial and lateral compartments of the proximal tibial surface. Statistical significance was defined as p≤0.05. RESULTS. The differences in alignment and component height between the tibial component placement and the ideal placement based on the bony resection are presented in Table 1. The magnitude of deviation in alignment was 1.2±0.9° for varus/valgus and 1.7±0.7° for posterior slope, with a tendency towards valgus (−0.2±1.6°) and reduced posterior slope (0.6±1.9°). The lateral compartment (2.4±0.9mm) had a generally higher increase in the height of the component compared to the medial compartment (1.0±0.9mm), the difference was close to being statistically significant (p=0.055). DISCUSSION. The finding of this study demonstrated that standard cement fixation during TKA may potentially influence the alignment and position of the tibial component. The formed cement layer generally results in elevated height, slightly more varus tibial alignment (overall limb valgus alignment) and less posterior slope in the implanted component. The results on the alignment are comparable to a previous study by Catani et al. [1]. More than 2°/2mm of deviation was found in the sagittal alignment (2 out of 5 knees), and medial (1 out of 5 knees) and lateral (3 out of 5 knees) component height, which may clinically impact the joint gap [2]. The varus/valgus alignment deviation found was clinically acceptable (≤3°). However when combined with other surgical variables, the accumulated impact on the alignment may warrant more investigation

Restoration of natural range and pattern of motion is the primary goal of joint replacement. In total ankle replacement, proper implant positioning is a major requirement to achieve good clinical results and to prevent instability, aseptic loosening, meniscal bearing premature wear and dislocation at the replaced ankle. The current operative techniques support limitedly the surgeon in achieving a best possible prosthetic component alignment and in assessing proper restoration of ligament natural tensioning, which could be well aided by computer-assisted surgical systems. Therefore the outcome of this replacement is, at present, mainly associated to surgeon's experience and visual inspection. In some of the current ankle prosthetic designs, tibial component positioning along the anterior/posterior (A/P) and medio/lateral axes is critical, particularly in those designs not with a flat articulation between the tibial and the meniscal or talar components. The general aim of this study was assessing in-vitro the effects of the A/P malpositioning of the tibial component on three-dimensional kinematics of the replaced joint and on tensioning of the calcaneofibular (CaFiL) and tibiocalcaneal (TiCaL) ligaments, during passive flexion. Particularly, the specific objective is to compare the intact ankle kinematics with that measured after prosthesis component implantation over a series of different positions of the tibial component. Four fresh-frozen specimens from amputation were analysed before and after implantation of an original convex-tibia fully-congruent three-component design of ankle replacement (Box Ankle, Finsbury Orthopaedics, UK). Each specimen included the intact tibia, fibula and ankle joint complex, completed with entire joint capsule, ligaments, muscular structures and skin. The subtalar joint was fixed with a pin protruding from the calcaneus for isolating tibiotalar joint motion. A rig was used to move the ankle joint complex along its full range of flexion while applying minimum load, i.e. passive motion. In these conditions, motion at the ankle was constrained only by the articular surfaces and the ligaments. A stereofotogrammetric system for surgical navigation (Stryker-Leibinger, Freiburg, Germany) was used to track the movement of the talus/calcaneus and tibial segments, by using trackers instrumented with five active markers. Anatomical based kinematics was obtained after digitization by an instrumented pointer of a number of anatomical landmarks and by a standard joint convention. The central point of the attachment areas of CaFiL e TiCaL was also digitised. Passive motion and ankle joint neutral position were acquired, and the standard operative technique was performed to prepare the bones for prosthesis component implantation. The final component for the talus was implanted, the tibial component was initially positioned well in front of the nominal right (NR) position, the meniscal bearing was instrumented with an additional special tracker, and passive motion was collected again in passive flexion. Data collection was repeated for progressively more posterior locations for the tibial component, for a total of six different locations along the tibial A/P axis: three anterior (PA), the NR, and two more posterior (PP), approximately 3 to 5 mm far apart each. The following three-dimensional kinematics variables were analyzed: the three anatomical components of the ankle joint (talus-to-tibial) rotation (dorsi/plantar flexion, prono/supination and internal/external rotation respectively in the sagittal, frontal and transverse planes), the meniscal bearing pose with respect to the talar and tibial components, the ‘ligament effective length fraction’ as the ratio between the instantaneous distance between the ligament attachment points and the corresponding maximum distance, and the instantaneous and mean helical axes in the tibial anatomical reference frame. In all specimens and in all conditions, physiological ranges of flexion, prono/supination and internal/external rotation were observed at the ankle joint. A good restoration of motion was observed at the replaced joint, demonstrated also by the coupling between axial rotation and flexion and the physiological location of the mean helical axis, in all specimens and in most of the component positions. Larger plantar- and smaller dorsi-flexion were observed when the tibial component was positioned more anteriorly than NR, and the opposite occurred for more posterior positions. In regards to the meniscal bearing, rotations were small and followed approximately the same patterns of the ankle rotations, accounted for the full conformity of the articulating surfaces. Translations in A/P were larger than in other directions, the bearing moving backward in plantarflexion and forward in dorsiflexion with respect to both components. It was observed that the closer to NR the position of the tibial component is, the larger this A/P motion is, accounted mainly to the associated larger range of flexion. The change of CaFiL and TiCaL effective length fraction over the flexion arc was found smaller than 0.1 in three specimens, smaller than 0.2 in the fourth, larger both in more anterior and more posterior locations of the tibial component. The simulated malpositioning did not affect much position and orientation of the mean helical axis in both the transversal and frontal planes. The experimental protocol and measurements were appropriate to achieve the proposed goals. All kinematics variables support the conclusion that the ankle replaced with this original prosthesis behaves as predicted by the relevant computer models, i.e. physiological joint motion and ligament tension is experienced resulting in a considerable A/P motion of the meniscal bearing. These observations are particularly true in the NR postion for the prosthesis, but are somehow correct also in most of the tibial malpositions analysed, in particular those on the back

Introduction. The precise indications for tibial component metal backing and modularity remain controversial in routine primary total knee arthroplasty. This is particularly true in elderly patients where the perceived benefits of metal backing such as load redistribution and the reduction of polyethylene strain may be clinically less relevant. The cost implications for choosing a metal-backed design over an all-polyethylene design may exceed USD500 per primary knee arthroplasty case. Methods. A prospective randomised clinical trial was carried out at the QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, to compare modular metal-backed versus an all-polyethylene tibial component. Outcome measures included clinical range of motion, radiographs, survivorship, Knee Society Clinical Rating System, WOMAC and SF-12. Results. 116 patients requesting primary knee arthroplasty were recruited and randomised between the Smith & Nephew Genesis I non-modular (57) and modular (59) tibial designs between September 1995 and August 1997. At 10 years clinical follow-up, 4 implant revisions or intention-to-revise decisions were recorded in the metal-tray/modular group of which 2 were for aseptic tibial component loosening. 2 implant revisions in the all-polyethylene non-modular group were recorded, neither of which were for tibial component loosening. At 5, 7 and 10 year review; the KSCRS, WOMAC and SF12 scores were similar in both groups. As most patients randomised were over seventy years of age, this impacted significantly on the numbers available for longer term review and data was analysed by comparing pre- and post-operative scores for individual patients. Conclusion. There was no difference in performance between the all-polyethylene tibial component and the metal-backed tibial component. The case for using the all-polyethylene tibia in elderly patients is justified on both clinical efficacy and cost-containment grounds