Abstract
Background
Total knee prostheses are continually being redesigned to improve performance, longevity and closer mimic kinematics of the native knee. Despite continued improvements, all knee implants even those with proven design features, have failures. We identified a cohort of patients with isolated tibial component failures that occurred in a popular and successful knee system. Our purpose was to (1) characterize the observed radiographic failure pattern; (2) investigate the biologic response that may contribute to the failure; and (3) to determine if the failure mechanism was of a biological or a mechanical nature.
Methods
Twenty-one knees from 19 patients met the inclusion criteria of having isolated tibial component failure in a commonly used knee implant system. Radiographs from the primary and revision knee surgery were analyzed for implant positioning and failure pattern, respectively. Inflammatory biomarkers IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were available in 16/21 knees and peripheral CD14+/16+ monocytes were measured in 10 of the above mentioned 16 knee revisions. Additionally, white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured to rule out infection as the cause of the cytokine upregulation.
Results
Radiograph findings demonstrated that all of the 21 tibial components were implanted in either neutral or 2–3° varus position, none of the revisions were implanted in valgus (figure 1). All tibias showed obvious radiographic loosening and failed into varus. The inflammatory biomarkers IL-1b, IL-6, & TNF-a were negative. WBC, ESR, CRP were normal. Peripheral CD14+/16+ and total CD16+ monocytesmeasurements were consistent with previous findings of patients with osteoarthritis (figure 2).
Conclusions
The findings supported a mechanical failure mechanism rather than that of a wear debris induced inflammatory pattern. The loosening, collapse and debonding from the cement may have been related to the implantation technique, stresses due to rotational freedom of the implant, or patient characteristics/behavior.
For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).
