Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 16 of 16
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 154 - 154
1 Nov 2021
Elbahi A Thomas O Dungey M Menon DK
Full Access

Introduction and Objective. When using radiation intraoperatively, a surgeon should aim to maintain the dose as low as reasonably achievable to obtain the diagnostic or therapeutic goal. The UK Health Protection Agency reported mean radiation dose-area-product (DAP) of 4 Gy cm2 for hip procedures. We aimed to investigate factors associated with increased radiation exposure in fixation of proximal femur fractures. Materials and Methods. We assessed 369 neck of femur fractures between April 2019 and April 2020 in one district general hospital. Fractures were classified as extracapsular or intracapsular and into subtypes as per AO classification. Data was collected on type of fractures, implants used, level of surgeon, duration of surgery and DAP. Types of fractures were subclassified as complex (multifragmentary, subtrochanteric and reverse oblique) or simple. Results. Patients with fractures fixed with DHS, short PFNA, long PFNA and cannulated screws were included. 50% of our patients were fixed with hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement and were therefore excluded. 184 patients were included in the analysis. There was a significant association of higher DAP with fracture subtype (P=0.001), fracture complexity (P<0.001), if an additional implant was used (P=0.001), if fixation was satisfactory (P=0.002) and the operative time (P<0.001). DAP was higher in PFNA than DHS and greatest in Long PFNA. There was some evidence of association between the level of the surgeon and DAP, although this was not statistically significant (P=0.069) and remained not significant after adjusting for the variables (fracture complexity, fixation or implant used) (p=0.32). Conclusions. Increased radiation in proximal femur fractures is seen in fixation of complex fractures, certain subtypes, the type of implant used and if an additional implant was required. Seniority of surgeon did not result in less radiation exposure even when adjusting for other factors, which is in contrast to other published studies


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 186 - 186
1 Jul 2014
Falcinelli C Schileo E Balistreri L Baruffaldi F Toni A Albisinni U Ceccarelli F Milandri L Viceconti M Taddei F
Full Access

Summary Statement. In a retrospective study, FE-based bone strength from CT data showed a greater ability than aBMD to discriminate proximal femur fractures versus controls. Introduction. Personalised Finite Element (FE) models from Computed Tomography (CT) data are superior to bone mineral density (BMD) in predicting proximal femoral strength in vitro [Cody, 1999]. However, results similar to BMD were obtained in vivo, in retrospective classification of generic prevalent fractures [Amin, 2011] and in prospective classification of femoral fractures [Orwoll, 2009]. The aim of this work is to test, in a case-control retrospective study, the ability of a different, validated FE modelling procedure [Schileo, 2008] to: (i) discriminate between groups of proximal femoral fractures and controls; (ii) individually classify fractures and controls. Patients & Methods. 55 women (22 incident low-trauma proximal femur fractures and 33 controls) were enrolled in 3 clinical centres in Emilia Romagna region, Italy. All received a full femoral CT and DXA exams (in acute conditions for fractured cases) with a standardised protocol. Femoral neck aBMD was measured from DXA. FE models were built from CT (right femur for controls, intact for fractured) [Schileo, 2008]. Differently from existing works, FE strength was calculated for a range of 12 physiological directions of hip joint reactions [Bergmann, 2001] and 10 fall directions [Grassi, 2012]. Bone strength (in stance and fall) was the minimum load inducing on the femoral neck surface an elastic principal strain value greater than the yield limit [Bayraktar, 2004]. Fracture classification was analysed through logistic regressions and AUC of ROC curves. Results. Mean FE strength and aBMD were significantly lower in the fractured than in the control group (33%, p<0.0001 for strength; 12% p=0.01 for aBMD). Logistic regression on single variables. All classifiers were significant (p<0.001, AUC=0.88 for both stance and fall FE strength, p=0.02, AUC=0.72 for aBMD). The statistical power of the logistic regressions [Vaeth, 2004] was >0.9 for FE strength, 0.86 for aBMD. Logistic regressions on multiple variables. Only FE strength was retained significant (p<0.001, AUC=0.88) when including aBMD in the regression. Adding age to the logistic regression, FE strength and age (but not aBMD) remained significant, with AUC=0.95. Discussion. FE strength could discriminate the fractured group better than aBMD and than [Keyak, 2011]. FE strength was a better fracture classifier than aBMD, and obtained AUC values slightly higher than [Amin, 2011; Orwoll, 2009]. The high statistical power mildens the small sample numerosity. Cases and controls were not age matched, but FE strength and age were found to be independent classifiers. In conclusion the proposed FE method was superior to aBMD in the classification of proximal femoral fractures


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Dec 2020
Scattergood SD Fletcher JWA Mehendale SA Mitchell SR
Full Access

Infected non-unions of proximal femoral fractures are difficult to treat. If debridement and revision fixation is unsuccessful, staged revision arthroplasty may be required. Non-viable tissue must be resected, coupled with the introduction of an antibiotic-eluting temporary spacer prior to definitive reconstruction. Definitive tissue microbiological diagnosis and targeted antibiotic therapy are required. In cases of significant proximal femoral bone loss, spacing options are limited. We present a case of a bisphosphonate-induced subtrochanteric fracture that progressed to infected non-union. Despite multiple washouts and two revision fixations, the infection remained active with an unfavourable antibiogram. The patient required staged revision arthroplasty including a proximal femoral resection. To enable better function by maintaining leg length and offset, a custom-made antibiotic-eluting articulating temporary spacer, the Cement-a-TAN, was fabricated. Using a trochanteric entry cephalocondylar nail as a scaffold, bone cement was moulded in order to fashion an anatomical, patient-specific, proximal femoral spacer. Following resolution of the infection, the Cement-a-TAN was removed and a proximal femoral arthroplasty was successfully performed. Cement-a-TAN is an excellent temporary spacing technique in staged proximal femoral replacement for infected non-union of the proximal femur where there has been significant bone loss. It preserves mobility and maintains leg length, offset and periarticular soft-tissue tension


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 37 - 37
1 May 2017
Roberts J Din NU Hawkes C Morrison V Lemmey A Williams N
Full Access

Background. Proximal femoral fracture is a common, major health problem resulting in loss of functional independence and a high cost burden on society. Rehabilitation can potentially maximise functional recovery, but evidence of effectiveness is lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention designed to improve self-efficacy and increase the amount and quality of practice of physical exercise and activities of daily living has been developed consisting of patient held workbooks and extra therapy sessions in the community. This study aims to define characteristics of the cohort of individuals this intervention is targeted to, assess acceptability of the intervention and feasibility of recruiting participants for a larger scale trial. Methods. An anonymous cohort study of all proximal femoral fracture patients admitted to three acute hospitals will provide details on residence pre-admission, type of fracture, type of surgery, adverse events and subsequent readmissions. A separate randomised feasibility study recruiting participants from this cohort will assess acceptability and feasibility of the study in terms of eligibility, recruitment, reasons for decline, retention and outcome measure completion. The success rate of identifying patients for the feasibility study and whether the recruited participants are representative of the cohort population will be evaluated by comparison of the feasibility participant screening and background data with that of the cohort. Results. 541 patients were screened for the feasibility study between June 2014 and February 2015 (ongoing). 298 were ineligible, 243 were eligible and 53 (22%) have been recruited to date. Lack of capacity is the leading cause of ineligibility and burden of taking part is perceived as a significant block to participation. Completion rate of outcome measures is high at baseline and follow up. Conclusions. Recruitment from the acute setting is challenging. However, study processes, outcome measurement and intervention is well tolerated by participants. Level of Evidence. I - Well conducted Randomised Trial (Pilot)


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 54 - 54
1 Dec 2020
Kacmaz IE Egeli E Basa CD Zhamilov V
Full Access

Proximal femur fractures are common in the elderly population. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between fracture type and proximal femoral geometric parameters. We retrospectively studied the electronic medical records of 85 elderly patients over 60 years of age who were admitted to the orthopedic department with hip fractures between January 2016 and January 2018 in a training and research hospital in Turkey. Age, fracture site, gender, implant type and proximal femoral geometry parameters (neck shaft angle [NSA], center edge angle [CEA], femoral head diameter [FHD], femoral neck diameter [FND], femoral neck axial length [FNAL], hip axial length [HAL], and femoral shaft diameter [FSD]) were recorded. Patients with femoral neck fractures and femur intertrochanteric fractures were divided into two groups. The relationship between proximal femoral geometric parameters and fracture types was examined. SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corparation, Armonk, New York, United States) program was used to analyze the variables. Independent samples t test was used to compare the fracture types according to NSA, FHD, FND and FSD variables. A statistically significant difference was found in FSD (p=0,002) and age (p=0,019). FSD and age were found to be greater in intertrochanteric fractures than neck fractures. Gender, site, CEA, FNAL, HAL, NSA, FHD and FND parametres were not significantly different. In the literature, it is seen that different results have been reached in different studies. In a study conducted in the Chinese population, a significant difference was found between the two groups in NSA, CEA and FNAL measurements. In a study conducted in the Korean population, a significant difference was found only in NSA measurements. The FSD is generally associated with bone mineral densitometry in the literature and has been shown to be a risk factor for fracture formation. However, a study showing that there is a relationship between FSD and fracture type is not available in the literature. In this study; FSD was found to be higher in intertrochanteric fractures (p = 0.002). However, for the clinical significance of this difference, we think that larger patient series and biomechanical studies are needed


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Jan 2017
Erani P Baleani M
Full Access

Good lag screw holding power in trabecular bone of the femoral head is a requisite to achieve stability in the management of proximal femoral fractures. It has been demonstrated that insertion torque and pullout strength of lag screw are linearly correlated. Therefore, insertion torque measurement could be a method to estimate the achieved screw purchase. Manual perception is not reliable [1], but the use of an instrumented screwdriver would make the procedure feasible. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy achievable using the insertion torque as predictor of lag screw purchase. Four different screw designs (two cannulated and two solid-core screws) were investigated in this study. Each screw was inserted into a block of trabecular bone tissue following a standardised procedure designed to maximise the experimental repeatability. The blocks of trabecular tissue were extracted from human as well as bovine femora to increase the range of bone mineral density. The prediction accuracy was evaluated by plotting pullout strength versus insertion torque, performing a linear regression analysis and calculating the difference (as percentage) between predicted and measured values. Insertion torque showed a strong linear correlation (coefficient of determination R. 2. : 0.95–0.99) with the pullout strength of lag screw. However the prediction error in pullout strength estimation was greater than 40% for small values of insertion torque, decreasing down to 15% when the lag screw was driven into good quality bone tissue. Measuring insertion torque can supply quantitative information about the achieved lag screw purchase. Since screw design and insertion procedure have been shown to affect both the insertion torque and the pullout strength [2], the prediction model must be screw-specific and determined, closely simulating the clinical procedure defined by the screw manufacturer. However, the surgeon must be aware that, even under highly repeatable experimental conditions, the prediction error was found to be high when small insertion torque was measured, i.e. when the screw was driven in low quality bone tissue. Therefore, insertion torque is not reliable in evaluating lag screw purchase in the management of proximal femur fracture of osteoporotic patients


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 12 - 12
1 Jan 2017
Hoffmann-Fliri L Hagen J Agarwal Y Scherrer S Weber A Altmann M Windolf M Gueorguiev B
Full Access

Hip fractures constitute the most debilitating complication of osteoporosis with a steadily increasing incidence in an aging population. Intramedullary nailing of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures can be challenging because of poor implant anchorage in the femoral head. Recently, cement augmentation of PFNA blades with Polymethylmethycrylate (PMMA) has shown promising results by enhancing the cutout resistance in proximal femoral fractures. The aim of this biomechanical study was to assess the impact of cement augmentation on the fixation strength of TFNA blades and screws within the femoral head, and compare its effect with head elements placed in a center or antero–posterior off–center positions. Eight groups were formed out of 96 polyurethane foam specimens with low density, simulating isolated femoral heads with severe osteoporotic bone. The specimens in each group were implanted with either non–augmented or PMMA–augmented TFNA blades or screws in a center or antero–posterior off–center position, 7 mm anterior or 7 mm posterior. They were mechanically tested in a setup simulating an unstable pertrochanteric fracture with lack of postero–medial support and load sharing at the fracture gap. All specimens underwent progressively increasing cyclic loading until catastrophic construct failure. Varus–valgus and head rotation angles were monitored by an inclinometer mounted on the head. A varus collapse of 5° or a 10° head rotation were defined as the clinically relevant failure criterion. Load at failure for specimens with augmented TFNA head elements (screw center: 3799 N ± 326 (mean ± SD); blade center: 3228 N ± 478; screw off–center: 2680 N ± 182; blade off–center: 2591 N ± 244) was significantly higher compared to the respective non–augmented specimens (blade center: 1489 N ± 41; screw center: 1593 N ± 120; blade off–center: 1018 N ± 48; screw off–center: 515 N ± 73), p<0.001. In both non–augmented and augmented specimens, the failure load in center position was significantly higher compared to the respective off–center position, regardless of head element, p<0.001. Non–augmented TFNA blades in off–center position revealed significantly higher load at failure versus non–augmented screws in off–center position, p<0.001. Cement augmentation clearly enhances fixation stability of TFNA blades and screws. Non–augmented blades outperformed screws in antero–posterior off–center position. Positioning of TFNA blades in the femoral head is more forgiving than TFNA screws in terms of failure load. Augmentation with TFNA has not been approved by FDA


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Apr 2018
Schray D Pfeufer D Zeckey C Böcker W Neuerburg C Kammerlander C
Full Access

Introduction. Aged trauma patients with proximal femur fractures are prone to various complications. They may be associated with their comorbidities which also need to be adressed. These complications limit the patient”s postoperative health status and subsequently their activity and independency. As an attempt to improve the postoperative management of aged hip fracture patients a better understanding of the postoperative condition in these patients is necessary. Therefore, this meta-analysis is intended to provide an overview of postoperative complications in the elderly hip fracture patients and to improve the understanding of an adequate postoperative management. Material and method. Medline was used to screen for studies reporting on the complication rates of hip fracture patients > 65 years. The search criteria were: “proximal femur fracture, elderly, complication”. In addition to surgical studies, internal medicine and geriatric studies were also included. Randomized studies, retrospective studies as well as observation studies were included. Furthermore, reoperation rates as well as treatment-related complications were recorded. The 1-year mortality was calculated as outcome parameter. Results. Overall 54 studies were enrolled, published between 2011 and 2016. The mean age of the 9812 patients was 81 years (65–99 years). Follow-up was at least one year. The reoperation rate after osteosynthesis of pertrochanteric femur fractures was 8.7%. The reoperation rate was dependent on the type of fracture and the surgical method. Pneumonia (9,5%) and urinary tract infections (27%) were the most common postoperative infections. With 23%, delirium was one of the most common medical complications. The 1-year mortality rate was 18.7%. Conclusion. Orthogeriatric patients represent a complex patient population. Addressing the special needs of elderly patients reduces postoperative complications. Establishing comanagement or orthogeriatric wards can also be helpful to manage comorbidities and postoperative complications. It is important to not only choose the proper surgical procedure but to monitor orthogeriatric patients closely during their hospitalization


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 77 - 77
1 Apr 2018
Neuerburg C Gleich J Löffel C Zeckey C Böcker W Kammerlander C
Full Access

Background. Polypharmacy of elderly trauma patients entails further difficulties in addition to the fracture treatment. Impaired renal function, altered metabolism and drugs that are potentially delirious or inhibit ossification, are only a few examples which must be carefully considered for the medication in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to investigate, if medication errors could be prevented by orthogeriatric comanagement compared to conventional trauma treatment. Material and methods. In a superregional traumacenter based on two locations in Munich, all patients ≥ 70 years with proximal femur fracture were consecutively recorded in a period of 3 months. After the end of the treatment the medical records of each patient were analyzed. At the hospital location 1 the treatment was carried out without orthogeriatric comanagement, at the hospital location 2 with this concept (DGU-certified orthogeriatric center). In addition to the basic medication all newly added drugs were recorded as well as changes in the medication plan and also wether treatment was carried out by the geriatrician or the trauma surgeon. Based on the START / STOPP criteria for the medication of geriatric patients, we defined “no-go” drugs with the geriatrician of the orthogeriatric center which should be avoided in the orthogeriatric patient (including benzodiazepines, gyrase inhibitors, NSAID like Ibuprofen with impaired GFR). The statistical analysis was done with the chi-square-test (IBM SPSS Statistics 24). Results and conclusion. A total of 46 patients were included, 37 of them female and 9 male with an average age of 84,5 years (SD±6.8). At the location without a geriatrician (18 patients), a prescription of one or more “no-go” drugs was found in 9 patients, whereas in location 2 (28 patients) only in 3 patients (p=0.003). Besides that, at the location with the geriatrician, a change in the medication was made for 17 patients during their stay in hospital. This shows that with the fixed integration of the geriatrician into the trauma surgical team, errors in the medication of the patients could be significantly more frequent avoided or faster detected and corrected. Although this should not limit the responsibility of the rest of the team, there is no doubt about the importance of the interdisciplinary treatment of elderly trauma patients


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 46 - 46
1 May 2017
Page P Lee C Rogers B
Full Access

Background. Fractures of the femoral neck occurring outside the capsule of the hip joint are assumed to have an intact blood supply and hence their conventional management is by fixation rather than arthroplasty. The dynamic hip screw and its variants have been used over many years to fix such fractures but have inherent vulnerabilities; they require an intact lateral femoral cortex, confer a relatively long moment arm to the redistribution of body weight and may cause a stress riser due to the plate with which they are fixed to the femur. Intramedullary devices for fixation of proximal femoral fractures have a shorter moment arm, can be distally locked with reduced perforation of the femoral cortex and are believed to be inherently more stable. For these reasons, a number of surgeons believe them to be superior to the DHS for all extracapsular fractures and their use is now widespread. In this study, we present the usage trends of both devices in extracapsular fractures over the last five years and set these results in the context of patient demographics. Methods. Our departmental electronic patient management system was used to identify all patients undergoing surgery coded as either DHS or its variants or intramedullary fixation of hip fracture. The patients’ age, sex and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grading were recorded. Comparison between groups was made using appropriate tests in SPSS. Results. Our unit has seen a steady move towards the use of intramedullary fixation of extracapsular fractures over five years, from 28.2% to 45.2% of operations, without a change in demographics of the population or a change in surgical outcomes at the most basic level. Conclusion. The move towards intramedullary fixation without evidence of improved outcomes, given the significantly higher cost, requires urgent research. Level of Evidence. IV


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_31 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Aug 2013
Marsh A Nisar A Patil S Meek R
Full Access

Repeat revision hip replacements can lead to severe bone loss necessitating salvage procedures such as proximal or total femoral replacement. We present medium term outcomes from our experience of the Limb Preservation System (LPS) in patients with failed revision hip arthroplasties. All patients undergoing proximal femoral or total femoral replacement from 2003–2007 at our unit were reviewed. Data was collected preoperatively and at annual assessment post procedure for a minimum of 5 years. This included clinical review, functional outcome scores (WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score) and radiographic evaluation. A total of 17 patients underwent femoral replacement (13 proximal, 4 total) using the LPS during the study period. Within this cohort there were 13 males and 4 females with a mean age of 64 years (range 47–86). Median follow up was 7 years (range 5–9 years). Primary diagnoses were DDH (7), Primary OA (5), RA (2), proximal femoral fracture (2) and phocomelia (1). Five patients (29%) required further revision surgery for infection (2 patients) or recurrent dislocations (3 patients). No stems required revision due to aseptic loosening or stem failure at 5–9 years. Compared to preoperative assessment, there was significant improvement in median outcome scores at 5 years (WOMAC increased by 33 points, Oxford hip score by16 points and Harris hip score by 43 points). 82% of patients maintained functional independence at latest review. The Limb Preservation System offers a salvage procedure for failed revision total hip arthroplasty with significant symptom and functional improvement in most patients at medium term follow up


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVIII | Pages 83 - 83
1 May 2012
Noor MS Pridham MC Fawcett MT Feng PY Hassan PO Pallister MI
Full Access

Introduction and aims. Biomechanical testing has been a cornerstone of the development of surgical implants for fracture stabilisation. To date most fracture surgery implant design and testing has been dominated by the use of standard bench top biomechanical testing. Although such methods have been used to successfully reproduce certain clinical observations, there are very clear limitations. More recently however, computerised engineering technology using finite element analysis (FEA) has been used to research orthopaedic biomechanical testing. This study aims to use FEA technology to further understand proximal femoral fractures, simulating falls, recreating fracture patterns and analyse fracture fixation devices for such fractures. Study design and results. In a multi-disciplinary collaboration, novel clinically relevant models were developed at Swansea University using advanced computational engineering. In-house software (developed initially for commercial aerospace engineering), allowed accurate finite element analysis (FEA) models of the whole femur to be created, including the internal architecture of the bone, by means of linear interpolation of Greyscale images from multiaxial CT scans. This allowed for modeling the changing trabecular structure & bone mineral density in progressive osteoporosis. Falls from standing were modeled in a variety of directions, (with & without muscle action) using analysis programs which resulted in fractures consistent with those seen in clinical practice. By meshing implants into these models and repeating the mechanism of injury in simulation, periprosthetic fractures have been successfully recreated. Discussion. The results highlight significant progress in FEA simulation and biomechanical testing of fractures. Further development with simulated physiological activities (e.g. walking and rising from sitting) along with attrition in the bone (in the boundary zones where stress concentration occurs) will allow further known the modes of failure of tried and tested implants to be reproduced. Robust simulation of macro and micro-scale events will allow the testing of novel new designs in simulations far more complex than conventional biomechanical testing will allow


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 1 | Pages 10 - 14
1 Feb 2020
Ibrahim M Reito A Pidgaiska O


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 8 | Pages 481 - 488
1 Aug 2017
Caruso G Bonomo M Valpiani G Salvatori G Gildone A Lorusso V Massari L

Objectives

Intramedullary fixation is considered the most stable treatment for pertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur and cut-out is one of the most frequent mechanical complications. In order to determine the role of clinical variables and radiological parameters in predicting the risk of this complication, we analysed the data pertaining to a group of patients recruited over the course of six years.

Methods

A total of 571 patients were included in this study, which analysed the incidence of cut-out in relation to several clinical variables: age; gender; the AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification system (AO/OTA); type of nail; cervical-diaphyseal angle; surgical wait times; anti-osteoporotic medication; complete post-operative weight bearing; and radiological parameters (namely the lag-screw position with respect to the femoral head, the Cleveland system, the tip-apex distance (TAD), and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD)).


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 5 | Pages 39 - 40
1 Oct 2017
Das A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 1 | Pages 141 - 144
1 Jan 2015
Hughes AW Clark D Carlino W Gosling O Spencer RF

Reported rates of dislocation in hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) for the treatment of intra-capsular fractures of the hip, range between 1% and 10%. HA is frequently performed through a direct lateral surgical approach. The aim of this study is to determine the contribution of the anterior capsule to the stability of a cemented HA through a direct lateral approach.

A total of five whole-body cadavers were thawed at room temperature, providing ten hip joints for investigation. A Thompson HA was cemented in place via a direct lateral approach. The cadavers were then positioned supine, both knee joints were disarticulated and a digital torque wrench was attached to the femur using a circular frame with three half pins. The wrench applied an external rotation force with the hip in extension to allow the hip to dislocate anteriorly. Each hip was dislocated twice; once with a capsular repair and once without repairing the capsule. Stratified sampling ensured the order in which this was performed was alternated for the paired hips on each cadaver.

Comparing peak torque force in hips with the capsule repaired and peak torque force in hips without repair of the capsule, revealed a significant difference between the ‘capsule repaired’ (mean 22.96 Nm, standard deviation (sd) 4.61) and the ‘capsule not repaired’ group (mean 5.6 Nm, sd 2.81) (p < 0.001). Capsular repair may help reduce the risk of hip dislocation following HA.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:141–4.