Abstract
Background
Fractures of the femoral neck occurring outside the capsule of the hip joint are assumed to have an intact blood supply and hence their conventional management is by fixation rather than arthroplasty. The dynamic hip screw and its variants have been used over many years to fix such fractures but have inherent vulnerabilities; they require an intact lateral femoral cortex, confer a relatively long moment arm to the redistribution of body weight and may cause a stress riser due to the plate with which they are fixed to the femur. Intramedullary devices for fixation of proximal femoral fractures have a shorter moment arm, can be distally locked with reduced perforation of the femoral cortex and are believed to be inherently more stable. For these reasons, a number of surgeons believe them to be superior to the DHS for all extracapsular fractures and their use is now widespread. In this study, we present the usage trends of both devices in extracapsular fractures over the last five years and set these results in the context of patient demographics.
Methods
Our departmental electronic patient management system was used to identify all patients undergoing surgery coded as either DHS or its variants or intramedullary fixation of hip fracture. The patients’ age, sex and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grading were recorded. Comparison between groups was made using appropriate tests in SPSS.
Results
Our unit has seen a steady move towards the use of intramedullary fixation of extracapsular fractures over five years, from 28.2% to 45.2% of operations, without a change in demographics of the population or a change in surgical outcomes at the most basic level.
Conclusion
The move towards intramedullary fixation without evidence of improved outcomes, given the significantly higher cost, requires urgent research.
Level of Evidence
IV
