Abstract
Background
Proximal femoral fracture is a common, major health problem resulting in loss of functional independence and a high cost burden on society. Rehabilitation can potentially maximise functional recovery, but evidence of effectiveness is lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention designed to improve self-efficacy and increase the amount and quality of practice of physical exercise and activities of daily living has been developed consisting of patient held workbooks and extra therapy sessions in the community. This study aims to define characteristics of the cohort of individuals this intervention is targeted to, assess acceptability of the intervention and feasibility of recruiting participants for a larger scale trial.
Methods
An anonymous cohort study of all proximal femoral fracture patients admitted to three acute hospitals will provide details on residence pre-admission, type of fracture, type of surgery, adverse events and subsequent readmissions. A separate randomised feasibility study recruiting participants from this cohort will assess acceptability and feasibility of the study in terms of eligibility, recruitment, reasons for decline, retention and outcome measure completion. The success rate of identifying patients for the feasibility study and whether the recruited participants are representative of the cohort population will be evaluated by comparison of the feasibility participant screening and background data with that of the cohort.
Results
541 patients were screened for the feasibility study between June 2014 and February 2015 (ongoing). 298 were ineligible, 243 were eligible and 53 (22%) have been recruited to date. Lack of capacity is the leading cause of ineligibility and burden of taking part is perceived as a significant block to participation. Completion rate of outcome measures is high at baseline and follow up.
Conclusions
Recruitment from the acute setting is challenging. However, study processes, outcome measurement and intervention is well tolerated by participants.
Level of Evidence
I - Well conducted Randomised Trial (Pilot)
