Background. In our pursuit of surgical accuracy and precision we often neglect to evaluate our results objectively. With the use of Computerised Tomography (CT) in pre-operative planning we can use the same technology in order to evaluate surgical accuracy. Hypothesis. The use of Patient Specific Instrumentation (CT based) produces an accurate intra operative guide for precision cutting in knee arthroplasty. Method. A prospective study using Patient Specific Instrumentation (customized cutting blocks) was performed on 35 patients. The small cohort value is due to the high costs of post-operative CT. A CT based software was used to evaluate the pre-operative knee alignment. Surgery was planned and verified on a web based programme with the use of 3D models. Cutting blocks were custom made and used as intra operative guide to make the relevant cuts. Pre and post-operative CT scans were compared for AP and lateral alignment, femoral external rotation and flexion and tibial slope. Knee Society scores were also used to evaluate the clinical outcome. Results. The values for AP and lateral limb alignment, femoral external rotation and flexion were the same as the pre-operative values with no significant deviation (maximum 2 degree difference). The posterior tibial slope was the only value that showed significant deviation from the pre-planned values. Conclusion. There was a significant difference for the posterior tibial slope but otherwise we found no difference in pre and post-operative limb alignment measurements. Pre-operative planning with the use of CT based customised cutting blocks is a reliable and accurate option to obtain optimal alignment and prosthetic orientation in total knee arthroplasty. NO DISCLOSURES

Glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse total shoulder replacements (rTSR) is key for stability and longevity. 3D planning and image-derived instrumentation (IDI) are techniques for improving implant placement accuracy. This is a single-blinded randomised controlled trial comparing 3D planning with IDI jigs versus 3D planning with conventional instrumentation. Eligible patients were enrolled and had 3D pre-operative planning. They were randomised to either IDI or conventional instrumentation; then underwent their rTSR. 6 weeks post operatively, a CT scan was performed and blinded assessors measured the accuracy of glenoid baseplate position relative to the pre-operative plan. 47 patients were included: 24 with IDI and 23 with conventional instrumentation. The IDI group were more likely to have a guidewire placement within 2mm of the preoperative plan in the superior/inferior plane when compared to the conventional group (p=0.01). The IDI group had a smaller degree of error when the native glenoid retroversion was >10° (p=0.047) when compared to the conventional group. All other parameters (inclination, anterior/posterior plane, glenoids with retroversion <10°) showed no significant difference between the two groups. Both IDI and conventional methods for rTSA placement are very accurate. However, IDI is more accurate for complex glenoid morphology and placement in the superior-inferior plane. Clinically, these two parameters are important and may prevent long term complications of scapular notching or glenoid baseplate loosening. Image-derived instrumentation (IDI) is significantly more accurate in glenoid component placement in the superior/inferior plane compared to conventional instrumentation when using 3D pre-operative planning. Additionally, in complex glenoid morphologies where the native retroversion is >10°, IDI has improved accuracy in glenoid placement compared to conventional instrumentation. IDI is an accurate method for glenoid guidewire and component placement in rTSA

Introduction. The most challenging aspect in rotational deformity correction is translating the pre-operative plan to an accurate intra-operative correction. Landmarks away from the osteotomy site are typically employed at pre-operative planning and this can render inadequate correction. Our proposed technique of pre-operative planning using CT scan and leg length radiographs can translate to accurate intra-operative correction. Materials and Methods. A circle was superimposed at osteotomy site with its centre serving as the centre of correction of rotation. Medio-lateral distance at osteotomy site measured and used as diameter of the circle. Circumference of the circle was calculated by multiplying diameter with Pi and used in the below formula to obtain accurate de-rotation distance;. Derotation distance = (Circumference/360) × correction value for desired ante-version. The exact site of osteotomy was measured in theatre under C-arm and exposed. Derotation distance was marked on the surface of bone as point A and point B with a flexible ruler. Osteotomy performed with saw and derotation was done till point A and point B were co-linear. Derotation distance obtained using this technique is specific for the site of chosen osteotomy and implies a specific degree of correction for every millimeter derotated. Distal femur was the chosen site of osteotomy if there was associated patellar instability and proximal femur if there was no patellar instability. Results. We have used the above technique to successfully correct rotational malalignment of femur and tibia in three patients thus far. The foot progression angle improved in all patients following surgery. One patient had post-operative CT scan of the hips which showed accurate reduction of ante-version. Conclusions. Our new technique of rotational deformity correction is simple and reproducible using commonly available tools as CT scan and leg length radiographs. This technique effectively translates the pre-operative plan to accurate intra-operative correction of rotational deformity

Recent innovations in total ankle replacement (TAR) have led to improvements in implant survivorship, accuracy of component positioning and sizing, and patient outcomes. CT-generated pre-operative plans and cutting guides show promising results in terms of placement enhancement and reproducibility in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of 1) implant sizes used and 2) alignment corrections obtained intraoperatively using the cutting guides provided, compared to what was predicted in the CT generated pre-operative plans. This is a retrospective study looking at 36 patients who underwent total ankle arthroplasty using a CT generated pre-operative planning system between July 2015 and December 2017. Personalized pre-operative planning data was obtained from the implant company. Two evaluators took measurements of the angle corrected using pre- and post-operative weight bearing ankle AP X-rays. All patients had a minimum three-month follow-up with weightbearing postoperative radiographs. The actual correction calculated from the radiographic assessment was compared with the predicted angles obtained from pre-operative plans. The predicted and predicted alternative component sizes and actual sizes used were also compared. If either a predicted or predicted alternative size was implanted, we considered it to be accurate. Average age for all patients was 64 years (range 40–83), with a body mass index of 28.2 ± 5.6. All surgeries were performed by two foot and ankle surgeons. The average total surgical time was 110 ± 23 minutes. Pre-operative alignment ranged from 36.7 degrees valgus to 20 degrees varus. Average predicted coronal alignment correction was 0.8 degrees varus ± 9.3 degrees (range, 18.2 degrees valgus to 29 degrees varus) and average correction obtained was 2.1 degrees valgus ± 11.1 degrees. Average post-op alignment was consistently within 5 degrees of neutral. There were no significant differences between the predicted alignments and the postoperative weightbearing alignments. The predicted tibia implant size was accurate in all cases. The predicted sizes were less accurate for talar implants and predicted the actual talar implant size used in 66% of cases. In all cases of predicted talar size mismatch, surgical plans predicted 1 implant size larger than used. Preliminary analyses of our data is comparable to previous studies looking at similar outcomes. However, our study had higher pre-operative deformities. Despite that, post-op alignments were consistently within 5 degress of neutral with no significant difference between the predicted and actual corrections. Tibial implant sizes are highly accurate while talar implant sizes had a trend of being one size smaller than predicted. Moreover, this effect seems to be more pronounced in the earlier cases likely reflective of increasing surgeon comfort with the implant with each subsequent case. These results confirm that pre-operative cutting guides are indeed helpful in intra-operative implant selection and positioning, however, there is still some room for innovation

Total hip replacement procedures are among the most frequent surgical interventions in all industrialized countries. Although it is a routine operationliterature reports that important parameters regarding for example cup orientation and leg length discrepancy often turn out to be not satisfying after surgery. This paper presents a novel concept to improve the reproducibility and accuracy for implantation of cup and stem prosthesis at exactly the desired locations. Existing computer- based commercial products either offer software solutions for just pre-operative planning, or imageless navigation systems that are only used during surgery in the operating theatre. The innovation of our approach is based on an integrated computer-assisted solution that combines pre-operative planning and intra-operative navigation to support THR procedures. The software for pre-operative planning can process both, 3D CT images and standard 2D x-ray images. A custom-built navigation system using optical 3D localizing technology has been developed to transfer planning results to the OR. The main objective of our approach is to implant the artificial joint in a way to restore the natural anatomy of the joint before surgery as close as possible, or with exactly planned modifications. In particular, cup inclination, cumulative anteversion of cup and stem, CCD angle and lateral offset, centre of rotation, leg length discrepancy, and joint range of motion are considered. It is not necessary to determine numerical values for all of these parameters because our approach uses a unique procedure to record the natural anatomical situation by combining pre-operative planning and intra-operative navigation, and subsequently supports implantation of the prosthesis components by surgical navigation in order to restore this situation. In case planar 2D x-ray images are used for pre-operative planning accurate scaling of these images is a prerequisite for exact determination of relevant parameters. The patient-specific scaling factor depends on the distance of the hip joint rotation centre from the x-ray detector or film. We have designed a low-cost localization system to be mounted close to the x-ray apparatus. It localizes the 3D position of the rotation centre by small motions of the leg and eliminates uncertainties of conventional methods that are caused by improper positioning of a calibration body. Easy and robust setup and application have been key objectives for the development of our custom-built navigation system. Acquisition of intraoperative parameters for example includes the determination of the acetabular centre axis by localizing selected landmarks at the acetabular rim. Intra-operative parameters are combined with pre-operative parameters without needing sophisticated matching procedures with the pre-operative images. A preliminary surgical workflow that will be detailed in the conference presentation has been designed for evaluation of the concept using sawbones models. Based on the promising results of our laboratory tests we have started to prepare first clinical experiments in close cooperation with surgeons

Introduction. Osteomyelitis is a challenge in diagnosis and treatment. 18F-FDG PET-CT provides a non-invasive tool for diagnosing and localizing osteomyelitis with a sensitivity reaching 94% and specificity reaching 100%. We aimed to assess the agreement in identifying the geographic area of infected bone and planned resection on plain X-ray versus 18F-FDG PET-CT. Materials & Methods. Clinical photos and X-rays of ten osteomyelitis patients were shown to ten consultant surgeons; they were asked to draw the area of infection and extent of planned surgical debridement; data will be compared to 18F-FDG PET-CT results. Results. We tested the agreement between the surgeons in every parameter. Regarding height, there was poor agreement between surgeons. Regarding perimeter, the ten surgeons showed low-moderate agreement. The ten surgeons showed a low-moderate agreement for circularity. Results document the variability of assessment and judgement based on plain X-rays. In comparison to PET-CT, All parameters were significantly different in favour of 18F-FDG PET-CT over X-ray (P < 0.001). Conclusions. 18F FDG PET-CT provides a three-dimensional tool for localizing the exact location of the infected bone and differentiating it from the normal bone. Thus, it could be beneficial in precise pre-operative planning and surgical debridement of chronic osteomyelitis

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become more frequently used in surgical specialties in recent years. Orthopaedic surgery is particularly well-suited to 3D printing applications, and thus has seen a variety of uses for this technology. These uses include pre-operative planning, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), and patient-specific implant production. As with any new technology, it is important to assess the clinical impact, if any, of three-dimensional printing. The purpose of this review was to answer the following questions: . What are the current clinical uses of 3D printing in orthopaedic surgery?. Does the use of 3D printing have an effect on peri-operative outcomes?. Four electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched for Articles discussing clinical applications of 3D printing in orthopaedics up to November 13, 2018. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate and data was abstracted. Descriptive analysis was performed for all studies. A meta-analysis was performed among eligible studies to compare estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, and fluoroscopy use between 3D printing cases and controls. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria for non-randomized studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42018099144). One-hundred and eight studies were included, published between 2012 and 2018. A total of 2328 patients were included in these studies, and 1558 patients were treated using 3D printing technology. The mean age of patients, where reported, was 47 years old (range 3 to 90). Three-dimensional printing was most commonly reported in trauma (N = 41) and oncology (N = 22). Pre-operative planning was the most common use of 3D printing (N = 63), followed by final implants (N = 32) and PSI (N = 22). Titanium was the most commonly used 3D printing material (16 studies, 27.1%). A wide range of costs were reported for 3D printing applications, ranging from “less than $10” to $20,000. The mean MINORS score for non-randomized studies was 8.3/16 for non-comparative studies (N = 78), and 17.7/24 for non-randomized comparative studies (N = 19). Among RCTs, the most commonly identified sources of bias were for performance and detection biases. Three-dimensional printing resulted in a statistically significant decrease in mean operative time (−15.6 mins, p < .00001), mean EBL (−35.9 mL, p<.00001), and mean fluoroscopy shots (−3.5 shots, p < .00001) in 3D printing patients compared to controls. The uses of 3D printing in orthopaedic surgery are growing rapidly, with its use being most common in trauma and oncology. Pre-operative planning is the most common use of 3D printing in orthopaedics. The use of 3D printing significantly reduces EBL, operative time, and fluoroscopy use compared to controls. Future research is needed to confirm and clarify the magnitude of these effects

Pre-operative planning in revision total knee replacement is important to simplify the surgery for the implant representative, operating room personnel and the surgeon. Revision knee arthroplasty is performed for many different reasons and of variable complexity. Many implant options can be considered including cemented and cementless primary and stemmed revision tibial and femoral components, with posterior cruciate retention or resection, and either with no constraint, varus/valgus constraint, or with rotating hinge bearings. One may also need femoral and tibial spacers, metaphyseal augments, or bulk allograft. It is important to pre-operatively determine which of these implants you may need. If you schedule a revision total knee and ask the implant representative to “bring everything you've got, just in case,” they will have to bring a truck full of instruments and implants. The first step of pre-operative planning is to determine how much implant constraint will be needed. Survivorship of revision total knees with modern varus/valgus constrained or rotating hinge implants are not that unacceptable. Ideally to enhance longevity, the least constraint needed should be used. This requires determination of the status of the ligaments. Varus and valgus stress is applied to the knee in near full extension, mid-flexion, and ninety degrees of flexion. If instability of the knee is noted, then radiographs are reviewed to determine if component malposition or malalignment is the reason for the collateral ligament laxity. If radiographs don't show a reason, then have additional constraint available in case the knee can't be balanced with proper component position and ligament balancing. In cases other than simple revisions, the posterior cruciate ligament is usually inadequate or needs to be resected to balance the knee. Substitution for the posterior cruciate ligament is usually needed for most revisions. The second step of pre-operative planning is to review radiographs to determine the amount and location of any bone loss. Osteolysis induced bone loss is usually worse than seen on plain radiographs. If unsure, a CT scan can be of help. The presence of significant bone loss contraindicates the use of primary components and mandates the need for stemmed implants. Larger defects may warrant having metallic augments or bulk graft present. Most revision knee implants can be conservatively metaphyseal cemented with diaphyseal engaging press-fit stems. The third step of pre-operative planning is to be familiar with what implants are present. Occasionally, one may not need to revise components that are stable and well aligned. Having compatible components available may simplify the surgery. Excellent pre-operative planning will minimise the need to bring in an excessive number of instruments and implants. It will help assure that the patient has a stable revision knee and simplify the surgery for all participants

In patients with shoulder arthritis, the ability to accurately determine glenoid morphological alterations affects the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty surgery significantly. This study was conducted to determine whether there is a correlation between scapular and glenoid morphometric components. Existence of such a correlation may help surgeons accurately estimate glenoid bone loss during pre-operative planning. The dimensions and geometric relationships of the scapula, scapula apophysis and glenoid were assessed using CT scan images of 37 South African and 40 Chinese cadavers. Various anatomical landmarks were marked on the 77 scapulae and a custom script was developed to perform the measurements. Intra-cohort correlation and inter-cohort differences were statistically analysed using IBM SPSS v28. The condition for statistical significance was p<0.05. The glenoid width and height were found to be significantly (p<0.05) correlated with superior glenoid to acromion tip distance, scapula height, acromion tip to acromion angle distance, acromion width, scapula width, and coracoid width, in both the cohorts. While anterior glenoid to coracoid tip distance was found to be significantly correlated to glenoid height and width in the South African cohort, it was only significantly correlated to glenoid height in the Chinese cohort. Significant (p<0.05) inter-cohort differences were observed for coracoid height, coracoid width, glenoid width, scapula width, superior glenoid to acromion tip distance, and anterior glenoid to coracoid tip distance. This study found correlations between the scapula apophyseal and glenoid measurements in the population groups studied. These morphometric correlations can be used to estimate the quantity of bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty patients

Introduction. Recent technological advancements have led to the introduction of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty to improve the accuracy and precision of bony resections and implant position. However, the in vivo accuracy is not widely reported. The primary objective of this study is to determine the accuracy and precision of a cut block positioning robotic arm. Method. Seventy-seven patients underwent total knee arthroplasty with various workflows and alignment targets by three arthroplasty-trained surgeons with previous experience using the ROSA® Knee System. Accuracy and precision were determined by measuring the difference between various workflow time points, including the final pre-operative plan, validated resection angle, and post-operative radiographs. The mean difference between the measurements determined accuracy, and the standard deviation represented precision. Results. The accuracy and precision for all angles comparing the final planned resection and validated resection angles was 0.90° ± 0.76°. The proportion within 3° ranged from 97.9% to 100%. The accuracy and precision for all angles comparing the final intra- operative plan and post-operative radiographs was 1.95 ± 1.48°. The proportion of patients within 3° was 93.2%, 95.3%, 96.6%, and 71.4% for the distal femur, proximal tibia, femoral flexion, and tibial slope angles when the final intra-operative plan was compared to post-operative radiographs. No patients had a postoperative complication requiring revision at the final follow-up. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the ROSA Knee System has accurate and precise coronal plane resections with few outliers. However, the tibial slope demonstrated decreased accuracy and precision were measured on post-operative short-leg lateral radiographs with this platform

Evaluation of patient specific spinopelvic mobility requires the detection of bony landmarks in lateral functional radiographs. Current manual landmarking methods are inefficient, and subjective. This study proposes a deep learning model to automate landmark detection and derivation of spinopelvic measurements (SPM). A deep learning model was developed using an international multicenter imaging database of 26,109 landmarked preoperative, and postoperative, lateral functional radiographs (HREC: Bellberry: 2020-08-764-A-2). Three functional positions were analysed: 1) standing, 2) contralateral step-up and 3) flexed seated. Landmarks were manually captured and independently verified by qualified engineers during pre-operative planning with additional assistance of 3D computed tomography derived landmarks. Pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) were derived from the predicted landmark coordinates. Interobserver variability was explored in a pilot study, consisting of 9 qualified engineers, annotating three functional images, while blinded to additional 3D information. The dataset was subdivided into 70:20:10 for training, validation, and testing. The model produced a mean absolute error (MAE), for PT, SS, and LLA of 1.7°±3.1°, 3.4°±3.8°, 4.9°±4.5°, respectively. PT MAE values were dependent on functional position: standing 1.2°±1.3°, step 1.7°±4.0°, and seated 2.4°±3.3°, p< 0.001. The mean model prediction time was 0.7 seconds per image. The interobserver 95% confidence interval (CI) for engineer measured PT, SS and LLA (1.9°, 1.9°, 3.1°, respectively) was comparable to the MAE values generated by the model. The model MAE reported comparable performance to the gold standard when blinded to additional 3D information. LLA prediction produced the lowest SPM accuracy potentially due to error propagation from the SS and L1 landmarks. Reduced PT accuracy in step and seated functional positions may be attributed to an increased occlusion of the pubic-symphysis landmark. Our model shows excellent performance when compared against the current gold standard manual annotation process

Knowledge of the premorbid glenoid shape and the morphological changes the bone undergoes in patients with glenohumeral arthritis can improve surgical outcomes in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Several studies have previously used scapular statistical shape models (SSMs) to predict premorbid glenoid shape and evaluate glenoid erosion properties. However, current literature suggests no studies have used scapular SSMs to examine the changes in glenoid surface area in patients with glenohumeral arthritis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the glenoid articular surface area between pathologic glenoid cavities from patients with glenohumeral arthritis and their predicted premorbid shape using a scapular SSM. Furthermore, this study compared pathologic glenoid surface area with that from virtually eroded glenoid models created without influence from internal bone remodelling activity and osteophyte formation. It was hypothesized that the pathologic glenoid cavities would exhibit the greatest glenoid surface area despite the eroded nature of the glenoid and the medialization, which in a vault shape, should logically result in less surface area. Computer tomography (CT) scans from 20 patients exhibiting type A2 glenoid erosion according to the Walch classification [Walch et al., 1999] were obtained. A scapular SSM was used to predict the premorbid glenoid shape for each scapula. The scapula and humerus from each patient were automatically segmented and exported as 3D object files along with the scapular SSM from a pre-operative planning software. Each scapula and a copy of its corresponding SSM were aligned using the coracoid, lateral edge of the acromion, inferior glenoid tubercule, scapular notch, and the trigonum spinae. Points were then digitized on both the pathologic humeral and glenoid surfaces and were used in an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) to align the humerus with the glenoid surface. A Boolean subtraction was then performed between the scapular SSM and the humerus to create a virtual erosion in the scapular SSM that matched the erosion orientation of the pathologic glenoid. This led to the development of three distinct glenoid models for each patient: premorbid, pathologic, and virtually eroded (Fig. 1). The glenoid surface area from each model was then determined using 3-Matic (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Figure 1. (A) Premorbid glenoid model, (B) pathologic glenoid model, and (C) virtually eroded glenoid model. The average glenoid surface area for the pathologic scapular models was 70% greater compared to the premorbid glenoid models (P < 0 .001). Furthermore, the surface area of the virtual glenoid erosions was 6.4% lower on average compared to the premorbid glenoid surface area (P=0.361). The larger surface area values observed in the pathologic glenoid cavities suggests that sufficient bone remodelling exists at the periphery of the glenoid bone in patients exhibiting A2 type glenohumeral arthritis. This is further supported by the large difference in glenoid surface area between the pathologic and virtually eroded glenoid cavities as the virtually eroded models only considered humeral anatomy when creating the erosion. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Neuromuscular scoliosis patients face rates of major complications of up to 49%. Along with pre-operative risk reduction strategies (including nutritional and bone health optimization), intra-operative strategies to decrease blood loss and decrease surgical time may help mitigate these risks. A major contributor to blood loss and surgical time is the insertion of instrumentation which is challenging in neuromuscular patient given their abnormal vertebral and pelvic anatomy. Standard pre-operative radiographs provide minimal information regarding pedicle diameter, length, blocks to pedicle entry (e.g. iliac crest overhang), or iliac crest orientation. To minimize blood loss and surgical time, we developed an “ultra-low dose” CT protocol without sedation for neuromuscular patients. Our prospective quality improvement study aimed to determine: if ultra-low dose CT without sedation was feasible given the movement disorders in this population; what the radiation exposure was compared to standard pre-operative imaging; whether the images allowed accurate assessment of the anatomy and intra-operative navigation given the ultra-low dose and potential movement during the scan. Fifteen non-ambulatory surgical patients with neuromuscular scoliosis received the standard spine XR and an ultra-low dose CT scan. Charts were reviewed for etiology of neuromuscular scoliosis and medical co-morbidities. The CT protocol was a high-speed, high-pitch, tube-current modulated acquisition at a fixed tube voltage. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction was applied to soft-tissue and bone kernels to mitigate noise. Radiation dose was quantified using reported dose indices (computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP)) and effective dose (E), calculated through Monte-Carlo simulation. Statistical analysis was completed using a paired student's T-test (α = 0.05). CT image quality was assessed for its use in preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation using 7D Surgical System Spine Module (7D Surgical, Toronto, Canada). Eight males and seven females were included in the study. Their average age (14±2 years old), preoperative Cobb angle (95±21 degrees), and kyphosis (60±18 degrees) were recorded. One patient was unable to undergo the ultra-low dose CT protocol without sedation due to a co-diagnosis of severe autism. The average XR radiation dose was 0.5±0.3 mSv. Variability in radiographic dose was due to a wide range in patient size, positioning (supine, sitting), number of views, imaging technique and body habitus. Associated CT radiation metrics were CTDIvol = 0.46±0.14 mGy, DLP = 26.2±8.1 mGy.cm and E = 0.6±0.2 mSv. CT radiation variability was due to body habitus and arm orientation. The radiation dose differences between radiographic and CT imaging were not statistically significant. All CT scans had adequate quality for preoperative assessment of pedicle diameter and orientation, obstacles impeding pedicle entry, S2-Alar screw orientation, and intra-operative navigation. “Ultra-low dose” CT scans without sedation were feasible in paediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. The effective dose was similar between the standard preoperative spinal XR and “ultra-low dose” CT scans. The “ultra-low dose” CT scan allowed accurate assessment of the anatomy, aided in pre-operative planning, and allowed intra-operative navigation despite the movement disorders in this patient population

Neuromuscular scoliosis patients face rates of major complications of up to 49%. Along with pre-operative risk reduction strategies (including nutritional and bone health optimization), intra-operative strategies to decrease blood loss and decrease surgical time may help mitigate these risks. A major contributor to blood loss and surgical time is the insertion of instrumentation which is challenging in neuromuscular patient given their abnormal vertebral and pelvic anatomy. Standard pre-operative radiographs provide minimal information regarding pedicle diameter, length, blocks to pedicle entry (e.g. iliac crest overhang), or iliac crest orientation. To minimize blood loss and surgical time, we developed an “ultra-low dose” CT protocol without sedation for neuromuscular patients. Our prospective quality improvement study aimed to determine:. if ultra-low dose CT without sedation was feasible given the movement disorders in this population;. what the radiation exposure was compared to standard pre-operative imaging;. whether the images allowed accurate assessment of the anatomy and intra-operative navigation given the ultra-low dose and potential movement during the scan. Fifteen non-ambulatory surgical patients with neuromuscular scoliosis received the standard spine XR and an ultra-low dose CT scan. Charts were reviewed for etiology of neuromuscular scoliosis and medical co-morbidities. The CT protocol was a high-speed, high-pitch, tube-current modulated acquisition at a fixed tube voltage. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction was applied to soft-tissue and bone kernels to mitigate noise. Radiation dose was quantified using reported dose indices (computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP)) and effective dose (E), calculated through Monte-Carlo simulation. Statistical analysis was completed using a paired student's T-test (α= 0.05). CT image quality was assessed for its use in preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation using 7D Surgical System Spine Module (7D Surgical, Toronto, Canada). Eight males and seven females were included in the study. Their average age (14±2 years old), preoperative Cobb angle (95±21 degrees), and kyphosis (60±18 degrees) were recorded. One patient was unable to undergo the ultra-low dose CT protocol without sedation due to a co-diagnosis of severe autism. The average XR radiation dose was 0.5±0.3 mSv. Variability in radiographic dose was due to a wide range in patient size, positioning (supine, sitting), number of views, imaging technique and body habitus. Associated CT radiation metrics were CTDIvol = 0.46±0.14 mGy, DLP = 26.2±8.1 mGy.cm and E = 0.6±0.2 mSv. CT radiation variability was due to body habitus and arm orientation. The radiation dose differences between radiographic and CT imaging were not statistically significant. All CT scans had adequate quality for preoperative assessment of pedicle diameter and orientation, obstacles impeding pedicle entry, S2-Alar screw orientation, and intra-operative navigation. “Ultra-low dose” CT scans without sedation were feasible in paediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. The effective dose was similar between the standard preoperative spinal XR and “ultra-low dose” CT scans. The “ultra-low dose” CT scan allowed accurate assessment of the anatomy, aided in pre-operative planning, and allowed intra-operative navigation despite the movement disorders in this patient population

Introduction. Acetabular dysplasia, also known as developmental dysplasia of the hip, has been shown to contribute to the onset of osteoarthritis. Surgical correction involves repositioning the acetabulum in order to improve coverage of the femoral head. However, ideal placement of the acetabular fragment can often be difficult due to inadequate visualization. Therefore, there has been an increased need for pre-operative planning and navigation modalities for this procedure. Methods. PubMed and EBSCO Host databases were queried using keywords (preoperative, pre-op, preop, before surgery, planning, plan, operation, surgery, surgical, acetabular dysplasia, developmental dysplasia of the hip, and Hip Dislocation, Congenital [Mesh]) from 1974 to March 2019. The search generated 411 results. We included all case-series, English, full-text manuscripts pertaining to pre-operative planning for congenital acetabular dysplasia. Exclusion criteria included: total hip arthroplasty (THA) planning, patient population mean age over 35, and double and single case studies. Results. A total of 12 manuscripts met our criteria for a total of 186 hips. Preoperative planning modalities described were: Amira (Thermo Fischer Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) − 12.9%, OrthoMap (Stryker Orthopaedics; Mahwah, NJ, USA) − 36.5%, Amira + Biomechanical Guidance System (Johns Hopkins University) − 5.9%, Mills et al. method − 16.1%, Klaue et al. method − 16.1%, Armand et al. method − 6.5%, Tsumura et al. method − 3.8%, and Morrita et al. method − 2.2%. Virtual implementation of the Amira software yielded increases in femoral head coverage (p<0.05) and a significant decrease in lateral center edge angle (LCEA) (p<0.05). A significant decrease in post-surgical complications (0.0% navigated group vs. 8.7% non-navigated group, p<0.01) was found with usage of OrthoMap related planning. Conclusion. There was a notable lack of prospective studies demonstrating the efficacy of these modalities, with decreased post-surgical complications being the only added benefit of their use. Additionally, small sample sizes and lack of commercial availability for many of these programs further diminishes their applicability. Future studies are needed to compare computer assisted planning with traditional radiographic assessment of ideal osteotomy orientation. Furthermore, these programs must be readily accessible rather than be solely available to the researchers who wrote the program. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The amount of bone loss due to implant failure, loosening, or osteolysis can vary greatly and can have a major impact on reconstructive options during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Massive bone loss can threaten ligamentous attachments in the vicinity of the knee and may require use of components with additional constraint to compensate for associated ligamentous instability. Classification of bone defects can be helpful in predicting the complexity of the reconstruction required and in facilitating pre-operative planning and implant selection. One very helpful classification of bone loss associated with TKA is the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Bone Defect Classification System as it provides the means to compare the location and extent of femoral and tibial bone loss encountered during revision surgery. In general, the higher grade defects (Type IIb or III) on both the femoral and tibial sides are more likely to require stemmed components, and may require the use of either structural graft or large augments to restore support for currently available modular revision components. Custom prostheses were previously utilised for massive defects of this sort, but more recently have been supplanted by revision TKA component systems with or without special metal augments or structural allograft. Options for bone defect management are: 1) Fill with cement; 2) Fill with cement supplemented by screws or K-wires; 3) Morselised bone grafting (for smaller, especially contained cavitary defects); 4) Small segment structural bone graft; 5) Impaction grafting; 6) Large prosthetic augments (cones); 7) Massive structural allograft-prosthetic composites (APC); 8) Custom implants. Maximizing support on intact host bone is a fundamental principle to successful reconstruction and frequently requires extending fixation to the adjacent diaphysis. Pre-operative planning is facilitated by good quality radiographs, supplemented on occasion by additional imaging such as CT. Fluoroscopically controlled x-ray views may assist in diagnosing the loose implant by better revealing the interface between the implant and bone and can facilitate accurate delineation of the extent of bone deficiency present. Part of the pre-operative plan is to ensure adequate range and variety of implant choices and bone graft resources for the planned reconstruction allowing for the potential for unexpected intra-operative findings such as occult fracture through deficient periprosthetic bone. Reconstruction of bone deficiency following removal of the failed implant is largely dictated by the location and extent of bone loss and the quality of bone that remains. While massive bone loss may compromise ligamentous attachment to bone, in the majority of reconstructions the degree of implant constraint needed for proper balancing and restoration of stability is independent of the bone defect. Thus some knees with minimal bone deficiency may require increased constraint due to the status of the soft tissues while others involving very large bone defects especially of the cavitary sort may be well managed with minimal constraint

The amount of bone loss due to implant failure, loosening, or osteolysis can vary greatly and can have a major impact on reconstructive options during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Massive bone loss can threaten ligamentous attachments in the vicinity of the knee and may require use of components with additional constraint to compensate for associated ligamentous instability. Classification of bone defects can be helpful in predicting the complexity of the reconstruction required and in facilitating pre-operative planning and implant selection. One very helpful classification of bone loss associated with TKA is the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Bone Defect Classification System as it provides the means to compare the location and extent of femoral and tibial bone loss encountered during revision surgery. In general, the higher grade defects (Type IIb or III) on both the femoral and tibial sides are more likely to require stemmed components, and may require the use of either structural graft or large augments to restore support for currently available modular revision components. Custom prostheses were previously utilised for massive defects of this sort, but more recently have been supplanted by revision TKA component systems with or without special metal augments or structural allograft. Options for bone defect management are: 1) Fill with cement; 2) Fill with cement supplemented by screws or K-wires; 3) Morselised bone grafting (for smaller, especially contained cavitary defects); 4) Small segment structural bone graft; 5) Impaction grafting; 6) Large prosthetic augments (cones); 7) Massive structural allograft-prosthetic composites (APC); 8) Custom implants. Maximizing support on intact host bone is a fundamental principle to successful reconstruction and frequently requires extending fixation to the adjacent diaphysis. Pre-operative planning is facilitated by good quality radiographs, supplemented on occasion by additional imaging such as CT. Fluoroscopically controlled x-ray views may assist in diagnosing the loose implant by better revealing the interface between the implant and bone and can facilitate accurate delineation of the extent of bone deficiency present. Part of the pre-operative plan is to ensure adequate range and variety of implant choices and bone graft resources for the planned reconstruction allowing for the potential for unexpected intra-operative findings such as occult fracture through deficient periprosthetic bone. Reconstruction of bone deficiency following removal of the failed implant is largely dictated by the location and extent of bone loss and the quality of bone that remains. While massive bone loss may compromise ligamentous attachment to bone, in the majority of reconstructions the degree of implant constraint needed for proper balancing and restoration of stability is independent of the bone defect. Thus some knees with minimal bone deficiency may require increased constraint due to the status of the soft tissues while others involving very large bone defects especially of the cavitary sort may be well managed with minimal constraint. Highly porous metal augments designed to reestablish metaphyseal support and function in the manner of a prosthetic structural graft have been introduced or are under development by several manufacturers. Published reports of short term experiences have been encouraging for both the tibial side and for femoral augmentation. It remains to be seen whether these implants will provide the desired longer term durability

Introduction. Preoperative templating of femoral and tibial components can assist in choosing the appropriate implant size prior to TKA. While weight bearing long limb roentograms have been shown to provide benefit to the surgeon in assessing alignment, disease state, and previous pathology or trauma, their accuracy in size prediction is continually debated due to scaling factors and rotated views. Further, they represent a static time point, accounting for boney anatomy only. A perceived benefit of robotic-assisted surgery is the ability to pre-operatively select component sizes with greater accuracy based on 3D information, however, to allow for flexibility in refining based on additional data only available at the time of surgery. Methods. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference of pre-operative plans in size prediction of the tibia, femur, and polyethylene insert. Eighty four cases were enrolled at three centers as part of an Investigational Device Exemption to evaluate a robotic-assisted TKA. All patients had a CT scan as part of a pre-operative planning protocol. Scans were segmented and implant sizes predicted based on the patients boney morphology and an estimated 2mm cartilage presence. Additional information such as actual cartilage presence and soft tissue effects on balance and kinematics were recorded intra-operatively. Utilizing this additional information, surgical plans were fine tuned if necessary to achieve minimal insert thickness and balance. Data from the Preoperative CT plan sizing and final size were compared to determine the percentage of size and within one size accuracy. Results. The pre-operative plan was able to determine the femoral and tibial components within one size for 100% of cases. Intra-operatively, surgeon upsized femoral 15 out of 85 (18%), downsized femoral 1 out of 85 (1%), baseplate 13 out of 85 (15%), and downsized baseplate 4 out of 85 (5%). Polyethylene exact size could be planned 93% of the time. Discussion/Conclusion. Robotic-assisted pre-operative CT based planning was accurate over 70% of the time for the femur and tibial components, and over 90% with respect to the insert thickness Additionally, intraoperative information allowed for adjustments to provide patients with ideal coverage of articular surfaces and for joint balancing providing optimal individualized component placement. Further research is needed to determine the potential cost savings in hospital and OR inventory management

Two critical steps in achieving optimal results and minimizing complications (dislocation, lengthening, and intra-operative fracture) are careful pre-operative planning and more recently, the option of intra-operative imaging in order to optimise accurate and reproducible total hip replacement. The important issues to ascertain are relative limb length, offset and center of rotation. It is important to start the case knowing the patient's perception of their limb length. Patient perception is equally important, if not more important, than the radiographic assessment. On the acetabular side, the teardrop should be identified and the amount of reaming necessary to place the inferior margin of the acetabular component adjacent to the tear drop should be noted. Superiorly the amount of exposed metal that is expected to be seen during surgery should be measured in millimeters. Once the key issues of limb length, offset, center of rotation, and acetabular component position relative to the native acetabulum have been confirmed along with the expected sizing of the acetabular and femoral components, it is critical that the operative plan is reproduced at the time of surgery and this can best be consistently performed with the use of intra-operative imaging. Advances in digital imaging now make efficient, cost-effective assessment of hip replacement possible. Embedded software allows accurate confirmation of the pre-operative plan intra-operatively when correction of potential errors is easily possible. Such technology is now mature after years of clinical use and studies have confirmed its success in avoiding outliers and achieving optimal results. A pilot study at Washington University demonstrated that intra-operative imaging was able to eliminate outliers for acetabular inclination and anteversion. In addition, the ability to achieve accurate reproduction of femoral offset and limb length within 5mm was three times better with intra-operative imaging (P <0.001)

Accurate 3D pre-operative planning shows significance of improving the precision of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Since CT acquisition leads to high radiation exposure to patients, it is clinically desirable to find an alternative to CT scan for planning THA or TKA such as patient-specific 2D–3D reconstruction from a limited number of 2D calibrated X-ray images acquired with much lower radiation dose e.g. EOS imaging. Feature-based 2D–3D non-rigid registration based on the construction of statistical shape model (SSM) as a priori has been applied to reconstruct the surface models of proximal femur, and also the surface reconstruction of lower extremity for TKA has been validated in a cadaveric study by Zheng et al. On the other hand, intensity-based 2D–3D non-rigid registration can reconstruct the patient-specific intensity volumes like CTs to allow an insight into lower extremity morphology such as intramedullary anatomy, which can provide more comprehensive information in routine clinical practice. In this study, we will present an atlas- based 2D–3D reconstruction method and introduce its application to reconstruct the intensity volumes of lower extremity. Moreover, we take the articulation in the knee joint into consideration so as to avoid the penetration between femur and tibia which is favourable for the pre-operative planning. The results of the experiments demonstrated the efficacy of the proposed method on reconstructing the lower extremity morphology as well as the intramedullary canal anatomy