Introduction. Many patients with obesity experience knee pain. Excess body weight is a modifiable risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA) and weight loss is encouraged in patients with OA. Bariatric surgery could improve or limit the progression of these conditions through significant weight loss. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a validated tool in the assessment of knee replacement surgery for OA. We present a novel application of the OKS to assess knee pain & function after weight loss surgery. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether there was a significant difference in mean OKS before and 24 months after weight loss surgery. Method. Eighteen female participants were included in this study. They underwent sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI) and OKS were collected pre- and 24 months post operatively. Result. There was an increase in the mean OKS from 31.8 (SD 11.8) pre surgery to 36.6 (SD 12.3) at 24 months. This was statistically significant (95% CI 0.99-10.5, p=0.02). Mean BMI reduced from 46.6 kg/m. 2. (SD 5.8) to 33.0 kg/m. 2. (SD 3.5). Conclusion. A significant improvement in mean OKS was seen after weight loss surgery. These findings demonstrate an improvement in knee pain & function with weight loss. This study contributes to a larger project evaluating the kinetic and kinematic changes to walking gait from weight loss

Abstract. Objectives. Conventional approaches (including Tobit) do not accurately account for ceiling effects in PROMs nor give uncertainty estimates. Here, a classifier neural network was used to estimate postoperative PROMs prior to surgery and compared with conventional methods. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were estimated with separate models. Methods. English NJR data from 2009 to 2018 was used, with 278.655 knee and 249.634 hip replacements. For both OKS and OHS estimations, the input variables included age, BMI, surgery date, sex, ASA, thromboprophylaxis, anaesthetic and preoperative PROMs responses. Bearing, fixation, head size and approach were also included for OHS and knee type for OKS estimation. A classifier neural network (NN) was compared with linear or Tobit regression, XGB and regression NN. The performance metrics were the root mean square error (RMSE), maximum absolute error (MAE) and area under curve (AUC). 95% confidence intervals were computed using 5-fold cross-validation. Results. The classifier NN and regression NN had the best RMSE, both with the same scores of 8.59±0.04 for knee and 7.88±0.04 for hip. The classifier NN had the best MAE, with 6.73±0.03 for knee and 5.73±0.03 for hip. The Tobit model was second, with 6.86±0.03 for knee and 6.00±0.01 for hip. The classifier NN had the best AUC, with (68.7±0.4)% for knee and (73.9±0.3)% for hip. The regression NN was second, with (67.1±0.3)% for knee and (71.1±0.4)% for hip. The Tobit model had the best AUC among conventional approaches, with (66.8±0.3)% for knee and (71.0±0.4)% for hip. Conclusions. The proposed model resulted in an improvement from the current state-of-the-art. Additionally, it estimates the full probability distribution of the postoperative PROMs, making it possible to know not only the estimated value but also its uncertainty

Robotic assistance in knee arthroplasty has become increasingly popular due to improved accuracy of prosthetic implantation. However, literature on the mid-term outcomes is limited especially that of hand-held robotic-assisted devices. We present one of the longest follow-up series to date using this novel technology and discuss the learning curve for introducing robotic technology into our practice. The purpose of this single-surgeon study is to evaluate the survival, patient-reported outcomes and learning curve for handheld boundary-controlled robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (HBRUKAs) at our hospital. This retrospective study evaluates 100 cases (94 Medial, 6 Lateral) performed by a single surgeon between October 2012 and July 2018. 52% were males, mean age was 64.5y (range 47.3y-85.2y) and mean BMI was 31.3 (range 21.8–43). Both inlay (40%) and onlay (60%) designs were implanted. Patients were followed up routinely at 1 and 5 years with Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) recorded. The learning curve was determined by tourniquet times. At a mean follow-up of 4.3 years (range 1.6y–7.3y), survivorship was 97%. There were three revisions: One case of aseptic loosening (1.5y), one case of deep-infection (3.8y) and one case of contralateral compartment osteoarthritis progression (5y). Mean 5-year OKS was 39.8. A 14.3% reduction in mean tourniquet times between the first 25 cases (105.5minutes) and subsequent cases (90.4minutes) was seen. This single-surgeon study showed good survivorship and patient-reported outcomes for HBRUKAs at our hospital. A learning curve of approximately 25 cases was shown, with significant decreases in tourniquet times with respect to increased surgeon experience

Companies manufacturing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses produce a variety of tibial and femoral components of different dimensions denoted by numbers or letters. Surgeons frequently implant components that are compatible but not of the same size on the femur and tibia. Recent studies suggest that equally sized femoral and tibial components produce better outcomes compared to size-mismatched components. In our study, we aim to explore the relationship between component size and outcome measured by oxford knee score at six weeks and one year following TKA. A cohort of twenty-four patients who underwent TKA and had well-functioning prosthesis were studied. Thirteen (54%) had equally sized TKA components implanted, seventy-four patients (42%) had components that were mismatched by one size, and one (4%) had components that were mismatched by more than one size. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) obtained preoperatively, at six weeks and one year postoperatively were retrieved from an electronic database. All data were analysed using R software. A significant improvement in pre-operative and one-year postoperative OKS was observed. Patients who received one-size mismatched tibial and femoral components demonstrated a less pronounced improvement in OKS as compared with patients who received equally sized components. When possible, it may be best to utilise equally sized prosthetic tibial and femoral components when performing total knee arthroplasty. Manufacturers may be able to produce better patient outcomes by including prostheses that are between sizes as part of their production line

Objectives. To define Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the Oxford hip score (OHS) and Oxford knee score (OKS) at mid-term follow-up. Methods. In a prospective multicentre cohort study, OHS and OKS were collected at a mean follow-up of three years (1.5 to 6.0), combined with a numeric rating scale (NRS) for satisfaction and an external validation question assessing the patient’s willingness to undergo surgery again. A total of 550 patients underwent total hip replacement (THR) and 367 underwent total knee replacement (TKR). Results. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified a PASS threshold of 42 for the OHS after THR and 37 for the OKS after TKR. THR patients with an OHS ≥ 42 and TKR patients with an OKS ≥ 37 had a higher NRS for satisfaction and a greater likelihood of being willing to undergo surgery again. Conclusions. PASS thresholds appear larger at mid-term follow-up than at six months after surgery. With- out external validation, we would advise against using these PASS thresholds as absolute thresholds in defining whether or not a patient has attained an acceptable symptom state after THR or TKR. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:7–13

Background. Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) has been accepted as a highly effective option for the treatment of medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Although pain in the medial joint line is significantly relieved after MOWHTO, some patients complain of pain over pes anserinus after the osteotomy, necessitating implant removal for pain relief. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to define the implant removal rate after MOWHTO due to patient complaints. Methods. 103 knees of 72 patients who underwent MOWHTO for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis between 2010 and 2018 with a follow-up of at least 24 months were enrolled in the study. Patients were evaluated with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain in the medial knee joint (VAS-MJ). All tests were performed before the surgery, at 12 months after surgery. VAS value for pain over pes anserinus (VAS-PA) was recorded at 12 months after MOWHTO and at 3 months after implant removal. Results. Mean follow-up was 31±5.4 months. TomoFix® medial high tibia plate (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) was used for the fixation of osteotomy in all cases. Significant improvement in KOOS, OKS and VAS-MJ were observed 12 months after MOWHTO. Average values of VAS-MJ and VAS-PA were 21.7±7.1 and 34±8.4, respectively. Implant removal was needed for 65 (63.1%) knees. There were no significant differences in regard of postoperative KOOS (p=0.134), OKS (p=0.287) and VAS-MJ (p=0.416) scores between patients for which implant removal was needed or not. VAS-PA value decreased significantly at 3 months after implant removal (p<0.001). Conclusion. A large portion of patients needed implant removal after MOWHTO to relieve pain over pes anserinus even if knee function was significantly improved. Lower profile plates may be preferred to avoid secondary implant removal surgery after MOWHTO

Aim. To investigate the validity of threshold values for the Oxford Hip and Knee Score (OHS and OKS) for treatment success 12 months after total knee or hip replacement. Methods. Questionnaires were administered to patients undergoing total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) replacement before and 12 months after surgery alongside questions assessing key accepted aspects of treatment success (satisfaction, pain relief, functional improvement) to form a composite criterion of success and assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Thresholds providing maximum sensitivity and specificity for predicting treatment success were determined for the total sample and subgroups defined by pre-surgery scores. Results. Data was available for 3203 THA and 2742 TKA patients. Applying the composite treatment success criterion, 52.7% of the TKA and 65.6% of the THA sample reported a successful treatment outcome. Accuracy for predicting treatment success was high for the OHS and OKS (both areas under curve 0.87). For the OHS a threshold value of 37.5 points showed highest sensitivity and specificity in the total sample, while for the OKS the optimal threshold was 32.5 points. Depending on pre-surgery scores optimal thresholds varied between 32.5 and 38.5 for the OHS and 28.5 and 35.5 for the OKS. Conclusions. This is the first study to apply a comprehensive composite “success” anchor to the OHS and OKS in order to determine thresholds for successful treatment with total joint replacement. Compared to widely publicised postoperative satisfaction metrics, far fewer patients report success with our composite anchor

Objectives. This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group. Methods. A total of 139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided robotic arm-assisted system. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, Short Form-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale, somatic disease (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Score), Pain visual analogue scale, analgesic use, patient satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90-day pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery. Results. From the first post-operative day through to week 8 post-operatively, the median pain scores for the robotic arm-assisted group were 55.4% lower than those observed in the manual surgery group (p = 0.040). At three months post-operatively, the robotic arm-assisted group had better AKSS (robotic median 164, interquartile range (IQR) 131 to 178, manual median 143, IQR 132 to 166), although no difference was noted with the OKS. At one year post-operatively, the observed differences with the AKSS had narrowed from a median of 21 points to a median of seven points (p = 0.106) (robotic median 171, IQR 153 to 179; manual median 164, IQR 144 to 182). No difference was observed with the OKS, and almost half of each group reached the ceiling limit of the score (OKS > 43). A greater proportion of patients receiving robotic arm-assisted surgery improved their UCLA activity score. Binary logistic regression modelling for dichotomised outcome scores predicted the key factors associated with achieving excellent outcome on the AKSS: a pre-operative activity level > 5 on the UCLA activity score and use of robotic-arm surgery. For the same regression modelling, factors associated with a poor outcome were manual surgery and pre-operative depression. Conclusion. Robotic arm-assisted surgery results in improved early pain scores and early function scores in some patient-reported outcomes measures, but no difference was observed at one year post-operatively. Although improved results favoured the robotic arm-assisted group in active patients (i.e. UCLA ⩾ 5), these do not withstand adjustment for multiple comparisons. Cite this article: M. J. G. Blyth, I. Anthony, P. Rowe, M. S. Banger, A. MacLean, B. Jones. Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:631–639. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0060.R1

Introduction and Objective. TKA have shown both excellent long-term survival rate and symptoms and knee function improvement. Despite the good results, the literature reports dissatisfaction rates around 20%. This rate of dissatisfaction could be due to the overstuff that mechanically aligned prostheses could produce during the range of motion. Either size discrepancy between bone resection and prosthetic component and constitutional mechanical tibiofemoral alignment (MTFA) alteration might increase soft tissue tension within the joint, inducing pain and functional limitation. Materials and Methods. Total knee arthroplasties performed between July 2019 and September 2020 were examined and then divided into two groups based on the presence (Group A) or absence (Group B) of patellofemoral overstuff, defined as a thickness difference of more than 2 mm between chosen component and bone resection performed, taking into account at least one of the following: femoral medial and lateral condyle, medial or lateral trochlea and patella. Based on pre and post-operative MTFA measurements, Group A was further divided into two subgroups whether the considered alignment was modified or not. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 6 months post-op using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Range of Motion (ROM). Results. One hundred total knee arthroplasties were included in the present study, 69 in Group A and 31 in group B. Mean age and BMI of patients was respectively 71 and 29.2. The greatest percentage of Patellofemoral Overstuff was found at the distal lateral femoral condyle. OKS, KSS functional score, and FJS were statistically significant higher in patients without Patellofemoral Overstuff. Therefore, Group A patients with a non-modified MTFA demonstrated statistically significant better KSS, ROM and FJS. Conclusions. Patellofemoral Overstuff decrease post-operative clinical scores in patients treated with TKA. The conventional mechanically aligned positioning of TKA components might be the primary cause of prosthetic overstuffing leading to worsened clinical results. Level of evidence: III; Prospective Cohort Observational study;

When performing total knee replacement (TKR), surgeons must select a size of tibial component tray that most closely matches the anatomy of the proximal tibia. As implants are available in a limited range of sizes, it may be necessary to slightly under or oversize the component. There are concerns overhang could lead to pain from irritation of soft tissues, and underhang could lead to subsidence and failure. 154 TKRs at 1- or 5-year follow up were reviewed prospectively. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), WOMAC and SF-12 was recorded along with pain scores. Scaled radiographs were reviewed and grouped into perfect sizing (78 TKRs, 50.6%), underhang in isolation (48 TKRs, 31.1%), minor overhang 1–3 mm (10 TKRs, 6.49%) or major overhang >3 mm (18 TKRs, 11.7%). There was no significant difference in the SF-12 (p=0.356), post-operative OKS (p=0.401) or WOMAC (p=0.466) score. For the OKS, there was no difference for the scores collected at 1 year (p=0.176) or at 5 years (p=0.883). Pre-operative OKS was well matched between the groups (p=0.152). There was no significant difference in the improvement in OKS from pre-operative scores (p=0.662). There was no significant difference in either the OKS or WOMAC pain scores (p=0.237 and 0.542 respectively). There was no significant association of medial overhang with?medial knee pain (p=1.000) or lateral overhang with lateral knee pain (p=0.569) when compared to the group of patients with a well sized tibial component. Our results suggest that tibial component overhang or underhang has no detrimental affect on outcome or pain scores. Surgeons should continue to select the tibial component that most closely fits the rim of the proximal tibia while accepting slight overhang if necessary due to the potential longer-term complications of subsidence and premature failure with an undersized tibial tray

INTRODUCTION. This study investigates the relationship between direct measurement of outcome and patient report of that outcome via the OKS. The stability of this relationship over time following surgery is also assessed. METHODS. 183 TKA patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 6, 26 and 52 weeks post-op. Oxford Knee Score was obtained along with measures of pain intensity, knee flexion, lower limb power and timed functional assessment. Correlation of performance variables with the OKS was assessed, and regression analysis performed on those that formed significant associations. Significance was accepted at p = 0.05. RESULTS. Pain intensity and functional ability improved with time post-op. Functional scores correlated modestly with OKS, consistently over the assessment period. Pain correlated poorly pre-op but well post-op. Regression modelling was able to explain differing amounts of the variation in OKS at the 4 time points; 34.8% pre-operatively, 44.0% at 6 weeks, 56.9% at 26 weeks and 62.3% at 52 weeks post-op. Pain was the dominant factor in deriving all of these models. DISCUSSION. Substantial variation was found in objective assessment of function and patient report of that function through the OKS. This relationship changed with time post-operatively. The explanatory power of the models improved as pain intensity reduced. CONCLUSION. These results question the accuracy of PROMS in representing the observed ability to perform functional tasks, which has implications for assessing outcome

To validate the Modified Forgotten Joint Score (MFJS) as a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hip and knee arthroplasty against the UK's gold standard Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS/OKS). The original Forgotten Joint Score was created by Behrend et al to assess post-op hip/knee arthroplasty patients. It is a new assessment tool devised to provide a greater discriminatory power, particularly in the well performing patients. It measures an appealing concept; the ability of a patient to forget about their artificial joint in everyday life. The original FJS was a 12-item questionnaire, which we have modified to 10-items to improve reliability and missing data. Postal questionnaires were sent out to 400 total hip/knee replacement (THR/TKR) patients who were 1–2 years post-op, along with the OHS/OKS and a visual pain analog score. The data collected from the 212 returned questionnaires (53% return rate) was analysed in relation to construct and content validity. A sub-cohort of 77 patients took part in a test-retest repeatability study to assess reliability of the MFJS. The MFJS proved to have an increased discriminatory power in high-performing patients in comparison to the OHS and OKS, highlighted by its more normal frequency of distribution and reduced ceiling effects in the MFJS. 30.8% of patients (n=131) scored 42–48 (equivalent to 87.5–100 in the MFJS) or more in the OKS compared to just 7.69% in the MFJS TKR patients. The MFJS proved to have an increased test-retest repeatability based upon its intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.968 compared to the Oxford's 0.845. The MFJS provides a more sensitive tool in the assessment of well performing hip and knee arthroplasties in comparison to the OHS/OKS. The MFJS tests the concept of awareness of a prosthetic joint, rather than pain and function and therefore should be used as adjunct to the OKS/OHS

Obese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) face increased risks of complications such as joint infection and early revision. However, the influence of obesity on measures of patient function following TKA is poorly defined. Knee arthroplasty outcome data for procedures carried out over an eight month period was extracted from a regional database in the UK. We analysed the impact of weight categories (BMI<30, BMI=30–34.9, and BMI≥35) on the Forgotten Joint Score – 12 (FJS-12) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Data was available preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Physical and mental health was assessed with the SF-12 one year after surgery. Data from 256 patients were available. 49.6% had a BMI<30, 27.4% had a BMI 30–34.9 and 23.1% had a BMI≥35. Mean FJS-12 results at 1-year were 48.7 points for patients with a BMI<30, 40.7 points for patients with a BMI=30–34.9 and 34.0 points for patients with a BMI≥35. Effect sizes for change from baseline to 12-month post-op were 3.0 (Cohen's d) in patients with BMI<30 and d=2.2 in patients with BMI≥35. Mean OKS results at 1 year were 36.9 (BMI<30), 33.7 (BMI=30–34.9) and 32.0 (BMI≥35) respectively. Effect sizes for change from baseline to 12-month was d=2.1 (BMI<30) and d=1.9 (BMI≥35). Differences between BMI groups with regard to post-operative change were statistically significant for the FJS-12 (p=0.038) but not for the OKS (p=0.229). This study highlights that outcome scores may differ in their ability to capture the impact of obesity on patient function following TKA. The FJS-12 showed significant differences in outcome based on patient obesity category, whereas the OKS did not detect between group differences

Aim. To evaluate the association of BMI and improvement in patient-reported outcomes after TKA. Methods. Knee replacement outcome data for procedures carried out over an eight month period was extracted from a regional arthroplasty register in the UK. Data was available before surgery and 12 months after. We analysed the impact of overweight on post-operative change in the Forgotten Joint Score − 12 (FJS-12) measuring joint awareness and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) measuring pain and function using five BMI categories (A: <25, B: 25–29.9, C: 30–34.9, D: 35–39.9 and E: >40). Results. We analysed data from 431 TKA patients with a mean age of 70.1 (SD=9.2 years) and 54.5% being female. Frequency of the BMI categories in our sample were as follows: A) 15.8% with a BMI<25, B) 32.8 % with a BMI 25–29.9, C) 27.7% with a BMI 30–34.9, D) 16.5 % with a BMI 35–39.9, and E) 7.1 % with a BMI above 39.9. Data analysis showed a statistically significant association (Z= 12.10, p=0.02) of BMI with post-operative improvement in the FJS-12 from pre-surgery to 12 months: A) + 37.9 points (Cohen”s d= 1.67); B) + 40.3 points (Cohen”s d= 1.67); C) + 34.0 points (Cohen”s d= 1.54) D) + 29.7 points (Cohen”s d= 1.29) and E) + 23.5 points (Cohen”s d= 1.24). Post-operative change in OKS did not show a statistically significant association with the BMI categories (Z=1.24, p=0.872). Conclusions. Our study shows that obesity has an impact on improvement after TKA in terms of joint awareness, with overweight patients being at higher risk of less benefit from surgery. Whereas the FJS-12 showed a substantial difference in the recovery process, the postoperative improvement measured with the OKS was comparable for patients in the different BMI categories. This highlights that outcome scores may differ in their ability to capture the impact of BMI on postoperative recovery

Introduction. Simultaneous correction of knee varus malalignment with medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery aims to address symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis in addition to restore knee stability in order to improve outcomes. The aim of this study is to present at least 5 years results of 32 patients who underwent simultaneous knee realignment osteotomy with ACL surgery. Methods. Patients with symptomatic instability due to chronic ACL deficiency or failed previous ACL surgery together with a varus malalignment of ≥6°, previous medial meniscectomy and symptomatic medial compartment pain who were treated with MOWHTO combined with ACL surgery were enrolled. ACL surgery was performed with the anatomical single bundle all-inside technique using TightRope. ®. RT (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) and MOWHTO using TomoFix. ®. medial high tibia plate (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) in all cases. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months, 12 months and annually postoperatively using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Euroqol's Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain. Results. 32 patients (22 men and 10 women) with a mean age of 41.2 years and mean BMI of 28.6 kg/m. 2. , underwent the combined procedures. Tibiofemoral neutral re-alignment was achieved in all patients with HTO. Complete subjective and objective scores have been obtained in 84.4% of patients with at least 5 years of follow-up (mean 8.7 years). An improvement in total KOOS of 27.1 points (p<0.003), OKS of 15.1 (p<0.003) and VAS for pain of 24.7 points (p<0.001) were detected. No ACL reconstruction failure was noted. Complications consisted of one superficial wound infection and one delayed union. Plate removal was needed in 20 (62.5%) patients due to pes anserinus pain. Conclusions. Simultaneous restoration of coronal knee axis by applying HTO and stability by ACL reconstruction/revision were reported to offer excellent improvement in early outcomes in patients with ACL rupture and symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The combined procedure requires careful pre-operative planning and is therefore technically challenging. However, by restoring the neutral axis and providing stability, it represents a good joint preserving alternative to arthroplasty for active middle-aged patients

Introduction. Management of the patellofemoral surface in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a topic of debate. Incidence of anterior knee pain and incidence of repeat operation have been the focus of several recent meta-analyses, however there is little recent data regarding patients” subjective ability to kneel effectively after TKA. The purpose of this study was to compare patient reported outcomes, including reported ability to kneel, after total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing. Methods. Retrospective chart review of 84 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA with patella resurfacing (56 knees) or without patella resurfacing (28 knees) having a minimum of 2.5 year follow up was performed. Oxford knee scores (OKS), visual analog pain scores (VAS), and questionnaires regarding ability to kneel were evaluated from both groups. Inability to kneel was defined as patients reporting inability or extreme difficulty with kneeling. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine normality of data. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the OKS and VAS between groups. Chi square test was used to compare kneeling ability between groups. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 23 (IBM, Aramonk, NY). Results. The 84 patients included 26 males and 58 females with average age 66.5 (range 46–91). Average follow up was 51 months (range 30–85). There was no significant difference in the percentage of female patients (64% vs 79%), age (67.8 vs 63.8), or reoperation rate (4% vs 7%) between the resurfaced and non-resurfaced groups. There was significantly longer follow up in the non-resurfaced group (57 vs 48 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the resurfacing and non-resurfacing group in terms of OKS (39 vs 38) or VAS (2.5 vs 3.0). However, those patients who did not have their patellofemoral joint resurfaced were more likely to report ability to kneel when compared to the resurfacing group (64% vs 39%, p=0.035). Kneeling ability was not correlated with duration of follow up, patient age or VAS. Kneeling ability was higher in female patients (57%) than males (27%), p=0.017. Discussion. There is concern for increased anterior knee pain and reoperation in patients whose patellae are not resurfaced. However, their failure to imnprove after revision to a resurfaced patella has left some room for depate as to whether or not the lack of resurfacing is the cause of their problems. This study did not show any increase in knee pain or reoperation between groups. There was an increased subjective ability to kneel in paients whose patellae were not resurfaced. This may have implications for the subset of paeitnts whose work or hobbies may require kneeling. There have been previous reports that subjective ability to kneel and actual ability may differ, and also that kneeling can be taught by a therapist. Our data also shows that female gender had a higher reported rate of kneeling

Physical outcome following total knee arthroplasty is variable. Satellite cells are undifferentiated myogenic precursors considered to be muscle stem cells. We hypothesised that; the recovery of muscle strength and physical function following knee arthroplasty would be influenced by the underlying number of muscle satellite cells. 16 patients provided a distal quadriceps muscle biopsy at time of surgery. Satellite cells were identified with a primary mouse antibody for Pax7 – a cytoplasmic protein marker, and the myonuclei with DAPI. Positive cells were identified on the basis of immunofluorescent staining in association with nuclear material, and confirmed by position under the basal lamina. Patient function was assessed using a validated physical assessment protocol, the Aggregated Locomotor Function (ALF) score, muscle strength assessed using the leg extensor power-rig, and clinical outcome assessed with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) pre-operatively and at 1 year post operatively. Muscle satellite cell content varied amongst the patient group (Positive Staining Index 3.1 to 11.4). Satellite cell content at time of surgery correlated with change in outcomes between pre-operative and 1 year assessments in all assessed parameters (ALF, r = 0.31; muscle power, r = 49; OKS, r = 0.33). Regression analysis employing a forward stepwise selection technique employed satellite cell volume in models of pre-operative to 1 year change for all outcome parameters. Physical function (satellite cell content, patient age and pre-operative ALF score) adjusted R2 = 0.92; Muscle power (pre-operative power and satellite cell content) adjusted R2 = 0.38; Clinical outcome (pre-operative OKS and satellite cell content) adjusted R2 = 0.28. Muscle satellite cell content influences recovery of muscle power and physical function following total knee arthroplasty. Importantly it is also associated with change in clinical scores; suggesting it to be a biomarker for patient outcomes

Patient function is poorly characterised following revision TKA. Modern semi-constrained implants are suggested to offer high levels of function, however, data is lacking to justify this claim. 52 consecutive aseptic revision TKA procedures performed at a single centre were prospectively evaluated; all were revision of a primary implant to a Triathlon total stabiliser prosthesis. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 6, 26, 52 and 104 weeks post-op. Outcome assessments were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range of motion, pain rating scale and timed functional assessment battery. Analysis was by repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD 95% simultaneous confidence intervals as pairwise comparison. Secondary analysis compared the results of this revision cohort to previously reported primary TKA data, performed by the same surgeons, with identical outcome assessments at equivalent time points. Mean age was 73.23 (SD 10.41) years, 57% were male. Mean time since index surgery was 9.03 (SD 5.6) years. 3 patients were lost to follow-up. All outcome parameters improved significantly over time (p <0.001). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that all outcomes changed between pre-op, 6 week and 26 weeks post-op assessments. No difference was seen between primary and revision cohorts in OKS (p = 0.2) or pain scores (p=0.19). Range of motion and functional performance was different between groups over the 2 year period (p=0.03), however this was due to differing pre-operative scores, post-hoc analysis showed no difference between groups at any post-operative time point. Patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA with semi-constrained implants made substantial improvements in OKS, pain scores, knee flexion, and timed functional performance, with the outcomes achieved comparable to those of primary TKA. High levels of function can be achieved following revision knee arthroplasty, which may be important considering the changing need for, and demographics of, revision surgery

Summary Statement. This paper is the first to compare the results of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision surgery between cases with explained pain and cases with unexplained pain. Revision surgery for unexplained pain usually results in a less favourable outcome. Introduction. Although it is suggested in literature that results of UKA to TKA revision surgery improve when the mechanism of failure is understood, a comparative study regarding this topic is lacking. Methods. All cases of revision surgery in two hospitals in the Netherlands were listed retrospectively. Fifteen cases with unexplained pain were listed in group A and 15 cases with a cause for pain in group B. Oxford knee scores (OKS), visual analogue scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction one year after revision surgery were compared. Results. OKS improved from 19 to 25 within group A and from 23 to 38 within group B. VAS improved from 7, 7 to 5, 4 within group A and from 7, 4 to 1, 7 within group B. The difference in outcome between both groups is statistically significant, p=0,022 for OKS and p=0,002 for VAS. Subgroup analysis in group A, performed in order to define a patient factor that predicts outcome of revision surgery in case of unexplained pain, showed no preoperative differences between both subgroups. Discussion. These results are important to properly inform patients about what to expect of revision surgery, highlighting that UKA to TKA revision surgery for unexplained pain generally results in a less favourable outcome

Anterior knee pain following primary total knee replacement (TKR) is a common problem with average reported rates in the literature of approximately 10%. Symptoms are frequently attributed to the patellofemoral joint, and the treatment of the patella during total knee replacement is controversial. There is no article in the literature that the authors know of that has specifically evaluated the effect of patella rim cautery on TKR outcome. This is a denervation technique that has historically been employed, with no evidence base. A prospective comparative cohort study was performed to compare the outcome scores of patients who underwent circumferential patella rim cautery, with those who did not. Patients who had undergone a primary TKR were identified from the unit's arthroplasty database. Two cohorts, who were age and gender matched, were established. None of the patients had their patella resurfaced, but all had a patellaplasty. The Low Contact Stress TKR (Depuy International) was used in all cases. The effect of circumferential patella rim cautery on the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the more anterior knee pain specific Patellar Score (PS) a minimum of 2 years post surgery was evaluated. Previous reports have suggested that a change of 5 points in the OKS represents a clinical difference. A sample size calculation based on an effect size of 5 points with 80% power and a p-value of 0.05 would require a minimum of 76 patients in each group. There were 94 patients who had undergone patellaplasty only, and 98 patients who had supplementary circumferential patella rim cautery during their primary TKR. The mean OKS were 34.61 and 33.29 respectively (p=0.41), while the PS scores were 21.03 and 20.87 (p=0.87). No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups for either outcome score. Patella rim cauterisation is unnecessary in primary TKR