Abstract
Companies manufacturing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses produce a variety of tibial and femoral components of different dimensions denoted by numbers or letters. Surgeons frequently implant components that are compatible but not of the same size on the femur and tibia. Recent studies suggest that equally sized femoral and tibial components produce better outcomes compared to size-mismatched components. In our study, we aim to explore the relationship between component size and outcome measured by oxford knee score at six weeks and one year following TKA.
A cohort of twenty-four patients who underwent TKA and had well-functioning prosthesis were studied. Thirteen (54%) had equally sized TKA components implanted, seventy-four patients (42%) had components that were mismatched by one size, and one (4%) had components that were mismatched by more than one size. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) obtained preoperatively, at six weeks and one year postoperatively were retrieved from an electronic database. All data were analysed using R software.
A significant improvement in pre-operative and one-year postoperative OKS was observed. Patients who received one-size mismatched tibial and femoral components demonstrated a less pronounced improvement in OKS as compared with patients who received equally sized components.
When possible, it may be best to utilise equally sized prosthetic tibial and femoral components when performing total knee arthroplasty. Manufacturers may be able to produce better patient outcomes by including prostheses that are between sizes as part of their production line.
