This study explored the relationship between the initial stability of the femoral component and penetration of cement into the graft bed following impaction allografting. Impaction allografting was carried out in human cadaveric femurs. In one group the cement was pressurised conventionally but in the other it was not pressurised. Migration and micromotion of the implant were measured under simulated walking loads. The specimens were then cross-sectioned and penetration of the cement measured. Around the distal half of the implant we found approximately 70% and 40% of contact of the cement with the endosteum in the pressure and no-pressure groups, respectively. The distal migration/micromotion, and valgus/varus migration were significantly higher in the no-pressure group than in that subjected to pressure. These motion components correlated negatively with the mean area of cement and its contact with the endosteum. The presence of cement at the endosteum appears to play an important role in the initial stability of the implant following impaction allografting

We studied various aspects of graft impaction and penetration of cement in an experimental model. Cancellous bone was removed proximally and local diaphyseal lytic defects were simulated in six human cadaver femora. After impaction grafting the specimens were sectioned and prepared for histomorphometric analysis. The porosity of the graft was lowest in Gruen zone 4 (52%) and highest in Gruen zone 1 (76%). At the levels of Gruen zones 6 and 2 the entire cross-section was almost filled with cement. Cement sometimes reached the endosteal surface in other Gruen zones. The mean peak impaction forces exerted with the impactors were negatively correlated with the porosity of the graft

Introduction. Beneath infection, instability and malalignment, aseptic tibial component loosening remains a major cause of failure in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [1]. This emphasizes the need for stable primary and long-term secondary fixation of tibial baseplates. To evaluate the primary stability of cemented tibial baseplates, different pre-clinical test methods have been undergone: finite element analysis [2], static push-out [3,4] or dynamic compression-shear loading [5] until interface failure. However, these test conditions do not reflect the long-term endurance under in vivo loading modes, where the tibial baseplate is predominantly subjected to compression and shear forces in a cyclic profile [5,6]. To distinguish between design parameters the aim of our study was to develop suitable pre-clinical test methods to evaluate the endurance of the implant-cement-bone interface fixation for tibial baseplates under severe anterior (method I) and internal-external torsional (method II) shear test conditions. Materials & Methods. To create a clinically relevant cement penetration pattern a 4. th. generation composite bone model was customised with a cancellous core (12.5 PCF cellular rigid PU foam) to enable for high cycle endurance testing. VEGA System. ®. PS & Columbus. ®. CRA/PSA ZrN-multilayer coated tibial baseplates (2×12) were implanted in the customised bone model using Palacos. ®. R HV bone cement (Figure 1). An anterior compression-shear test (method II) was conducted at 2500 N for 10 million cycles and continued at 3000 N & 3500 N for each 1 million cycles (total: 12 million cycles) simulating post-cam engagement at 45° flexion. An internal-external torsional shear test (method II) was executed in an exaggeration of clinically relevant rotations [7,8] with ±17.2° for 1 million cycles at 3000 N tibio-femoral load in extension. After endurance testing either under anterior shear or internal-external torsion each tibial baseplate was mounted into a testing frame and maximum push-out strength was determined [3]. Results. The cement penetration depth and characteristic pattern were comparable to 3D-CT scans of 24 cemented human tibiae from a previous study [5]. From the final push-out testing, no statistical significant differences could be found for anterior compression-shear testing (method I) with VEGA System. ®. PS (2674 ± 754 N) and Columbus. ®. CRA/PSA (2177 ± 429 N) (p = 0.191), as well as internal-external torsional shear testing (method II) between VEGA System. ®. PS (2561 ± 519 N) and Columbus. ®. CRA/PSA (2825 ± 515 N) tibial baseplates (p = 0.399). Discussion. The newly developed methods allow the evaluation of the endurance behaviour of the implant-cement-bone interface fixation for tibial baseplates in comparison to clinically long-term established knee systems, based on a combination of a suitable artificial bone model and severe anterior and internal-external torsional high cycle shear test conditions

Modular hip prostheses were introduced to optimize the intra-surgical adaptation of the implant design to the native anatomy und biomechanics of the hip. The downside of a modular implant design with an additional modular interface is the potential susceptibility to fretting, crevice corrosion and wear. For testing hip implants with proximal femoral modularity according to ISO & ASTM, sodium chloride solutions are frequently used to determine the fatigue strength and durability of the stem-neck connection. The present study illustrate that the expansion of standard requirements of biomechanical testing is necessary to simulate metal ion release as well as fretting and crevice corrosion by using alternative test fluids. To assess the primary stability of tibial plateaus in vitro, different approaches had been undergone: cement penetration depth analysis, static tension or compression loading until interface failure. However, these test conditions do not reflect the in vivo physiologic loading modes, where the tibial plateau is predominantly subjected to combined compression and shear forces. The objectives were to evaluate the impact of the tibial keel & stem length on the primary stability of a posterior-stabilised tibial plateau under dynamic compression-shear loading conditions in human tibiae

Background. It is hypothesised that good torsional resistance of the acetabular cement mantle can increase the stability and longevity of cemented THR. Surgeons aim to achieve this by drilling keyholes (KH) in the acetabulum for the cement to penetrate. This study aims to reduce the surgical variability by investigating the influence of KH diameter on torsional resistance for a range of acetabular diameters. Methods. Three most common diameters of acetabula were tested (50, 54 and 58 mm) to compare three types of KHs: A) 3 × 12 mm diameter, 120° apart, 6 mm deep blind holes; B) 6 × 6 mm diameter, 60° apart, 6 mm deep blind holes; C) 6 × 6 mm diameter, 60° apart, through holes. An anatomically accurate experimental rig to simulate the implanted acetabulum was used, it allowed the torque strength of a cement mantle to be measured. The cups were cemented into the rig to create a 4 mm mantle and left to cure for 24 h at room temperature. Each sample was tested in the torque rig by applying a ramp displacement at 1.5 °/min until failure. The test was repeated four times for each acetabulum-keyhole combination. Peak torque was used for quantifying torsional resistance. Results. The mean and standard deviation peak torque for the A keyholes was 194 Nm (25.7), 251 Nm (25.3) and 334 Nm (20.9) for 50, 54 and 58 mm respectively; for the B keyholes the peak torque was 146 Nm (54.0), 143 Nm (48.6), 123 Nm (29.5); and for the C keyholes the peak torque was 208 Nm (6.0), 278 Nm (25.5), 244 Nm (74.1). Mann-Whitney test detected significant differences only between A and B groups at 54 mm (p = 0.021) and 58 mm (p=0.021). The torsional resistance increased with acetabular diameter only for the A keyholes (Kruskal Wallis Test, p = 0.01). Conclusions. The larger keyholes provided more consistent and substantially higher peak torque values. The difference was more evident with the increasing acetabular diameter. The large variability in the B keyholes was caused by poor cement penetration, this could potentially be the case clinically. C keyholes were an improvement, yet there were still consistency issues for the larger acetabulum. The limiting factor was the cement-cup interface, which is also where the failure occurred (except for most of the B keyholes and 58 mm acetabulum C keyholes). Level of Evidence. II b

Femoral neck fractures remain the leading cause of early failure after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Although its' exact pathomechanism has yet to be fully elucidated, current retrieval analysis has shown that either an osteonecrotic event and/or significant surgical trauma to the femoral head neck junction are the leading causes. It is most likely that no single factor like patient selection and/or femoral component orientation can fully avoid their occurrence. As in osteonecrosis of the native hip joint, a certain cell injury threshold may have to be reached in order for femoral neck fracture to occur. These insults are not limited to the surgical approach, but also include femoral head preparation, neck notching, and cement penetration. Although some have argued that the posterior approach does not represent an increased risk fracture for ON after hip resurfacing because of the so-called intraosseous blood supply to the femoral head, to date, the current body of literature on femoral head blood flow in the presence of arthritis has confirmed the critical role of the extraosseous blood supply from the ascending branch of the medial circumflex, as well as the lack of any substantial intraosseous blood supply. Conversely, anterior hip dislocation of both the native hip joint as well as the arthritic hip preserves femoral head vascularity. The blood supply can be compromised by either sacrificing the main branch of the ascending medial femoral circumflex artery or damaging the retinacular vessels at the femoral head-neck junction. Thus an approach which preserves head vascularity, while minimizing soft tissue disruption would certainly be favorable for hip resurfacing. This presentation will review the current state of knowledge on vascularity of the femoral head as well as surgical techniques enhancing its preservation

The renewed interest in the clinically proven low wear of the metal-on-metal bearing combined with the capacity of inserting a thin walled cementless acetabular component has fostered the reintroduction of hip resurfacing. As in other forms of conservative hip surgery, i.e. pelvic osteotomies and impingement surgery, patient selection will help minimize complications and the need for early reoperation. Patient Selection and Hip Resurfacing. Although hip resurfacing was initially plagued with high failure rates, the introduction of metal on metal bearings as well as hybrid fixation has shown excellent survivorships of 97 to 99% at 4 to 5 years follow-up. However, it is important to critically look at the initial published results. In all of these series there was some form of patient selection. For example, in the Daniel and associates publications, only patients with osteoarthritis with an age less than 55 were included with 79% of patients being male. Treacy and associates stated that: “the operation was offered to men under the age of 65 years and women under the age of 60 years, with normal bone stock judged by plain radiographs and an expectation that they would return to an active lifestyle, including some sports”. However in the materials and methods, although the mean age is 52 years, the range is from 17 to 76 years including some patients with rheumatoid arthritis as well as osteonecrosis. Obviously, some form of patient selection is needed; but how one integrates them is where the Surface Arthroplasty Risk Index (SARI) is useful. With a maximum score of 6, points are assigned accordingly: femoral head cyst >1cm: 2 points; patient weight <82kg: 2 points; previous hip surgery: 1 point; UCLA Activity level >6: 1 point. A SARI score >3 represented a 4 fold increase risk in early failure or adverse radiological changes and with a survivorship of 89% at four years. The SARI index also proved to be relevant in assessing the outcome of the all cemented McMinn resurfacing implant (Corin¯, Circentester, England) at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. Hips which had failed or with evidence of radiographic failure on the femoral side had a significantly higher SARI score than the remaining hips, 3.9 versus 1.9. Finally, one must consider the underlying diagnosis when evaluating a patient for hip resurfacing. In cases of dysplasia, acetabular deficiencies combined with the inability of inserting screws through the acetabular component may make initial implant stability unpredictable. This deformity in combination with a significant leg length discrepancy or valgus femoral neck could compromise the functional results of surface arthroplasty, and in those situations a stem type total hip replacement may provide a superior functional outcome. In respect to other diagnoses (osteonecrosis, inflammatory arthritis), initial analyses have not demonstrated any particular diagnostic group at greater risk of earlier failure. The only reservation we have is in patients with compromised renal function since metal ions generated from the metal-on-metal bearing are excreted through the urine and the lack of clearance of these ions may lead to excessive levels in the blood. Surgical Technique. Because resurfacing has not been within the training curriculum of orthopaedic surgeons for the last 2 decades, there will most likely be a learning curve in the integration of this implant within clinical practice. This data was confirmed for hip resurfacing when looking at the Canadian Academic Experience where in the first 50 cases of five arthroplasty surgeons only a 3.2% failure rate was noted of which 1.6% were due to neck fracture. Femoral neck fracture can occur because of significant varus positioning as well as osteonecrosis of the femoral head due to either disruption of the blood supply or over cement penetration. Finally, abnormal wear patterns leading to severe soft tissue reactions are being increasingly recognized and are related to either impingement or vertically placed acetabular components. Although impingement has long been recognized after total hip arthroplasty to limit range of motion and in extreme cases to hip instability, the risk after hip resurfacing may be greater since the femoral head-neck unit is preserved. Beaulé and associates have reported that 56% of hips treated by hip resurfacing have an abnormal offset ratio pre-operatively, with the two main diagnostic groups presenting deficient head-neck offset being osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis both of which have been associated with femoroacetabular impingement in the pre arthritic state. Conclusion. Although patients with a high activity level are likely to put their hip arthroplasties at risk for earlier failure, limiting a patient's activity because of fear of revision with a stem type hip arthroplasty has been shown to negatively impact the quality of life at long term follow-up. Thus hip resurfacing arthroplasty plays a significant role in the treatment of hip arthritis by permitting a return to full activities or what the patient perceives as his/her full capacities to do so, permitting them to enjoy a better quality of life without fearing a major hip revision

An experimental sheep model was used for impaction allografting of 12 hemiarthroplasty femoral components placed into two equal-sized groups. In group 1, a 50:50 mixture of ApaPore hydroxyapatite bone-graft substitute and allograft was used. In group 2, ApaPore and allograft were mixed in a 90:10 ratio. Both groups were killed at six months. Ground reaction force results demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups at 8, 16 and 24 weeks post-operatively, and all animals remained active. The mean bone turnover rates were significantly greater in group 1, at 0.00206 mm/day, compared to group 2 at 0.0013 mm/day (p < 0.05). The results for the area of new bone formation demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups in thickness of the cement mantle (p > 0.05) and percentage ApaPore-bone contact (p > 0.05).

The results of this animal study demonstrated that a mixture of ApaPore allograft in a 90:10 ratio was comparable to using a 50:50 mixture.

Impacted morsellised allografts have been used successfully to address the problem of poor bone stock in revision surgery. However, there are concerns about the transmission of pathogens, the high cost and the shortage of supply of donor bone. Bone-graft extenders, such as tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA), have been developed to minimise the use of donor bone. In a human cadaver model we have evaluated the surgical and mechanical feasibility of a TCP/HA bone-graft extender during impaction grafting revision surgery.

A TCP/HA allograft mix increased the risk of producing a fissure in the femur during the impaction procedure, but provided a higher initial mechanical stability when compared with bone graft alone. The implications of the use of this type of graft extender in impaction grafting revision surgery are discussed.