The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) is a clinically led web based audit used to inform national policy guidelines. The aim of this audit was to establish the accuracy of completion of NHFD v13.0 theatre collection sheets, identify common pitfalls and areas of good practice, whilst raising awareness of the importance of accuracy of this data and the manner in which it reflects performance of CAH Trauma & Orthopaedic unit in relation to national guidelines. Our aim was to improve completion up to >80% by the operating surgeon and improve overall accuracy. The methodology within both cycles of the audit were identical. It involved reviewing the NHFD V13.0 completed by the operating surgeon and cross-checking their accuracy against clinical notes, operation notes, imaging, anaesthetic charts and A&E admission assessment. Following completion of cycle 1 these results were presented, and education surrounding V13.0 was provided, at the monthly trust audit meeting. At this point we introduced a sticker onto the pre-operative checklist for Hip fractures. This included time of admission and reason for delay. We then completed a re-audit. Cycle-1 included 25 operations, 56% (n=14) had a completed V13.0 form. Of these 21% (n=3) were deemed to be 100% accurate. Cycle-2 included 31 operations (between April – June 21) 81% (n=25) had a completed intra-operative from and showed an increase in accuracy to 56% (n=14). Through raising awareness, education and our interventions we have seen a significant improvement in the completion and accuracy of v13.0. Although 100% accuracy was not achieved its clear that education and intervention will improve compliance over time. Through the interventions that we have implemented we have shown that it is possible to improve completion and accuracy of the NHFD V13.0 theatre collection sheet locally and feel this could be implemented nationally

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are very common injuries. National recommendations (British Orthopaedic Association, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)) exist in the UK to guide the management of these injuries. These guidelines provide recommendations about several aspects of care including which type of injuries to treat non-operatively and surgically, timing of surgery and routine follow-up. In particular, current recommendations include considering immobilizing patients for 4 weeks in plaster for those managed conservatively, and operating on fractures within 72 hours for intra-articular injuries and 7 days for extra-articular fractures. With increased demands for services and an ageing population, prompt surgery for those presenting with distal radius fractures is not always possible. A key factor is the need for prompt surgery for hip fracture patients. This study is an audit of the current standard of care at a busy level 2 trauma unit against national guidelines for the management of DRFs. This retrospective audit includes all patients presenting to our emergency department from June to September 2018. Patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of a closed distal radius fracture and follow-up in our department were included in the study. Those with open fractures were excluded. Data was retrieved from clinical coding, electronic patient records, and IMPAX Client (Picture archiving and communication system). The following data was collected on patients treated conservatively and those managed surgically:- (1)Time to surgery for surgical management; (2)Period of immobilization for both conservative and operative groups. 45 patients (13 male, 32 female) with 49 distal radius fractures (2 patients had bilateral injuries) were included. Patients had mean age 63 years (range 19 to 92 years) 30 wrists were treated non-operatively and 19 wrists treated surgically (8 K-wires, 10 ORIF, 1 MUA). Mean time to surgery in the operative group was 8 days (range 1 – 21 days, median 7 days). Mean time to surgery for intra-articular fractures was 7 days (range 1 – 21) and 12 days for extra-articular fractures (range 4 – 20). Mean immobilization period in those treated in plaster is 6 weeks (range 4 – 13 weeks, median 5.6 weeks). At busy level 2 trauma units with limited theatre capacity and a high volume of hip fracture admissions, time to surgery for less urgent injuries such as wrist fractures is often delayed. National guidelines are useful in helping to guide management however their standards are often difficult to achieve in the context of increasing populations in urban areas and an ageing population

There has been extensive research into neck of femur fractures in the elderly. Fragility non-hip femoral fractures share many of the same challenges [1]. Surgical management is complex, patients are frail and mortality rates have been reported as high as 38% [2]. Despite this, relatively little data is available evaluating the level of MDT care provided to non-hip femoral fractures. This audit aimed to evaluate the standard of MDT care provided for patients with non-hip femoral fractures according to the NHFD key performance indicators. The following fractures were included in the dataset: distal femoral, femoral shaft and peri-prosthetic femoral. Patients under 65 were excluded. Data was retrospectively collected using post-operative and medical documentation. Performance was assessed according to five key performance indicators:. Did orthogeriatrics review the patient within 72-hours?. Was surgery performed within 36-hours?. Was the patient weight bearing post-operatively?. Was a confusion assessment completed?. Was the patient discharged home?. 38 patients met the inclusion criteria. 84% of patients were seen by orthogeriatrics within 72 hours of admission. 32% of patients were operated on within 36-hours of admission, with time to theatre exceeding 36-hours in 92% of peri-prosthetic fractures. 37% of patients were not advised to full weight bear post operatively. 84% of patients received a confusion assessment whilst 61% of patients were discharged to their prior place of living. Our results suggest that non-hip femoral fractures do not receive the same standard of MDT care as neck of femur fractures. Greater prioritisation of resources should be given to this patient subset so that care is equivalent to hip-fracture patients. Time to surgery is a particular area for improvement, particularly in peri-prosthetic fractures, a trend that is mirrored nationally. Greater emphasis should be placed on encouraging full-weight bearing post-operatively to prevent post-surgical complications

The ankle radiograph is a commonly requested investigation as the ankle joint is commonly injured. Each radiograph exposes 0.01 mSv of radiation to the patient that is equivalent to 1.5 days of natural background radiation [1]. The aim of the clinical audit was to use the Ottawa Ankle Rule to attempt to reduce the number of ankle radiographs taken in patients with acute ankle injuries and hence reduce the dose of ionising radiation the patient receives. A retrospective audit was undertaken. 123 ankle radiograph requests and radiographs taken between May and July 2018 were evaluated. Each ankle radiograph request including patient history and clinical examination was graded against the Ottawa Ankle Rule. The rule states that 1 point(s) indicates radiograph series; (1) malleolar and/or midfoot pain; (1) tenderness over the posterior 6cm or tip of the lateral or medial malleolus (ankle); (1) tenderness over the navicular or the base of the fifth metatarsal (foot); (1) unable to take four steps both immediately and in the emergency department [2]. Patients who score 0 do not need radiograph series. Each radiograph was reviewed if a fracture was present or not. The clinical audit identified 14 true positives where the Ottawa Ankle Rule scored 1 and the patient had an ankle fracture, and 2 false negatives (sensitivity 88%). There were 81 false positives, and 23 true negatives (specificity 22%). Therefore, a total of 23/123 ankle radiographs were unnecessary which is equivalent to 34.5 days of background radiation. The negative predictive value of the Ottawa Ankle Rule in this audit was 92%. The low rate of Ottawa rule utilisation may unnecessarily cause patient harm that should be addressed. An educational intervention with physicians combined with integration of the Ottawa rule scoring in ankle radiograph requests is planned with re-audit in 6 months

Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) is a consultant-led orthopaedic trauma outpatient triage and management service. The use of VFC has recently become commonplace in the United Kingdom. It allows multiple referral sources to the orthopaedic team, with clinical information and imaging reviewed by a consultant in VFC who formulates an appropriate management plan with the patient contacted; either to attend clinic for consultation or discharged with advice over the phone. The VFC is more efficient than a traditionally delivered outpatient fracture clinic service. We have utilized VFC for 1 year at our hospital, East Kent University Hospital Foundation Trust (EKHUFT), and undertook a closed loop audit to evaluate the service and highlight potential areas of improvement. The Objective of the study was to identify whether the implementation of new re-designed VFC referral guidelines together with teaching set across one of the hospitals in EKHUFT improved the effectiveness and standards of VFC referrals. An initial audit was performed of all referrals made to VFC over a 2 weeks period in December 2018. Changes to the VFC referral pathway were implemented, and teaching sessions performed by the orthopaedic team to all referring units, including minor injury units (MIU) and the emergency department (ED). After implementation, re-audit of VFC referrals was performed in February 2019 over a similar 2 weeks period. Patient demographics, diagnosis and outcomes were collected from the online patient record with images reviewed using PACS software. Following intervention, referral rates dropped by 27.7% (136 vs 188 patients) over the 2 weeks periods. Patient demographics, injury type and severity remained the same between the 2 groups. 51.5% (70/136) did not meet VFC pathway criteria after the intervention and were considered inappropriate, compared to 70% in the original group. 15.4% (21/136) referrals could have been managed in the emergency department using the new guidelines and leaflet discharge. 5.1% (7/136) of the referrals should have been referred to orthopaedic on-call acutely and 22% (30/136) of the referrals had a soft tissue injury or no injury identified. This did not change between the 2 groups despite intervention. Referring MIU and ED units require continued support and teaching over a prolonged time period to hopefully see further improvements. Immediate hot reporting of radiographs may further benefit the service, but staffing and funding issues particularly out of hours, means this remains an aspiration

Few doctors answer their bleep by stating who they are. Answering the phone in a formal manner is of utmost importance in the hospital setting especially by on-call teams who are normally referred patients by other specialties, general practitioners and in some cases by other hospitals. An audit to evaluate the internal hospital communication was completed. In the first part of this audit, junior doctors within the orthopaedic department at the RAH were bleeped. Doctors were expected to answer by initiating the conversation by stating (1) name, (2) department, (3) grade and (4) a greeting. A list of omissions was recorded. If the call went through switchboard, it was expected that the hospital name was stated. The second part of the audit extended to other specialties in the RAH as well as orthopaedic departments in hospitals within the Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board (NHS GGC). Forty-three bleeps were made to doctors of various grades over a period of two months. Nine bleeps (two from other hospitals) were not answered. Five doctors answered their bleep in full. Only twenty-one doctors stated their name whilst eleven stated their grade. In both instances the department was not necessarily stated. The results were similar between the different departments as well as between the seven hospitals offering an orthopaedic service within NHS GGC. Of the thirteen on-call doctors that were bleeped as an external call through switchboard, only one doctor stated the hospital name. This has implications since most hospitals within NHS GGC share a common switchboard. These results emphasise the need for a protocol within NHS GGC for a standard etiquette for intra and inter hospital communication to ensure that patient safety and confidentiality is safeguarded

More than half of patients with neck of femur (NOF) fractures report their pain as severe to very severe in the first 24hrs. Opioids remain the most commonly used analgesia and are effective for static pain but not dynamic pain. Opioids provide suboptimal analgesia when patients are in a dynamic transition state and their side-effects are a source of morbidity in these patients. The Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) involves infiltration of the fascia iliaca compartment with a large volume of low concentrated local anaesthetic to reduce pain by affecting the femoral and lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. The London Quality Standards for Fractured neck of femur services (2013) stated that the FICB should be routinely offered to patients. We performed an audit of patient outcomes following the introduction of the FICB across three centres. We performed a two-cycle audit across two hospitals in 2014/15. The first cycle audited compliance with the NICE guidance in the management and documentation of pain and AMTS (Abbreviated Mental Test Scores) in patients. The second cycle was conducted following the integration of the FICB into the multidisciplinary NOF fracture protocol across three hospital sites. Data was collected on numeric pain scores, pre and post-op AMTS and opioid requirements. There were 40 patients audited with 20 in the first cycle prior to the introduction of the FICB and 20 following this. In the second cycle, there was a statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) in the difference between the pre and post-op AMTS. The preliminary findings in this audit support the use of the FICB adjunct to analgesia in the pre-operative management of NOF fracture patients. The FICB is a safe procedure and the organisational learning of this procedure through a multidisciplinary approach can significantly improve the outcomes of NOF fracture patients

Background. The approach to Intramedullary (IM) fixation of long bone fractures remains a controversial issue. Early reports demonstrated less favourable results of retrograde nailing as compared with antegrade options due to higher non-union rates. The aim of this audit was to evaluate the outcomes of practice within the Trauma and Orthopaedic department with relation to IM nail fixation of diaphyseal femur fractures. Methodology. The Trauma database between February 2010 and September 2013 was used to identify all femur IM nailing procedures. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) software was used to classify the fractures according to the Muller AO classification. All 3–2 (Diaphyseal femur fractures) were included in the audit. PACS imaging together with outpatient documentation was evaluated for radiological and clinical outcome. Results. A total sample size of 23 patients was identified (13 antegrade vs. 10 retrograde approach fixations). Mean patient age was 67 years and male to female ratios were similar (11M vs. 12F). Antegrade nailing was performed in a younger population as compared to retrograde nailing (mean age 60 vs. 73 respectively). Mean time to union was somewhat more protracted in the retrograde group (7 vs. 5 months), although all fractures united. The most common complication with relation to antegrade nailing was due to distal locking screws backing out. I case of infection was reported in the retrograde nail group, which was treated successfully with antibiotic therapy. There were 2 cases of nonunion observed in the antegrade group. Conclusions. The results of our practice were comparable to those published in recent literature. Overall, union rates for the two groups of fixation were similar. Each fixation technique is associated with its own specific set of complications. As a general rule antegrade nailing was reserved for a younger population so as to prevent trauma to the native knee joint

Aim. The knee radiograph is a commonly requested investigation as the knee joint is commonly injured. Each radiograph exposes 0.01mSv of radiation to the patient that is equivalent to 1.5 days of natural background radiation. Also, each knee radiograph costs approximately £37.16 to produce. The aim of the clinical audit was to use the Pittsburgh knee rules to attempt to reduce the number of knee radiographs taken in patients with acute knee injuries and hence reduce the dose of ionising radiation the patient receives. Method. A retrospective audit was undertaken. 149 knee requests and radiographs taken during October 2016 were evaluated. Each knee radiograph request including patient history and clinical examination was graded against the Pittsburgh knee rules to give a qualifying score. The Pittsburgh knee rules assigns 1 point for each of the following; blunt trauma or a fall, age less than 12 years or over 50 years, and unable to take 4 limping weight bearing steps in the emergency department. A Pittsburgh knee rule qualifying score warranting a knee radiograph is 2 or more points, where the patient must have had blunt trauma or a fall. A Pittsburgh knee rule score less than 2 points predicts a non-fractured knee and hence no radiograph warranted. Each radiograph was reviewed if a fracture was present or not. Results. The clinical audit identified 85 true negative patients where their Pittsburgh knee rule score was less than 2 points and they did not have a fracture of the knee joint. The Pittsburgh knee rule score of less than 2 points did not warrant obtaining knee radiographs. Therefore, a total of 85 knee radiographs were unnecessary which is equivalent to 127.5 days of background radiation. The financial burden of these unnecessary radiographs is £2648.60. The negative predictive value of the Pittsburgh knee rules in this audit was 93.4%. Discussion. The clinical audit shows that the use of the Pittsburgh knee rules scoring system can reduce the number of knee radiographs obtained by 57.4% and hence the doses of ionising radiation patients are exposed to. The audit also showed this clinical scoring system has a high negative predictive value that when utilised can discern patients with a normal knee joint who do not require a knee radiograph. In conclusion employing the Pittsburgh knee rule scoring system can improve patient safety by reducing ionising radiation exposure and can reduce financial costs of patient encounters

Background. Best practice tariff (BPT) for hip fracture was introduced in April 2010, offering financial incentive to encourage trusts to implement best practice and improve quality of care. This equates to £1335. An early indicator of a patient's outcome is the time to operation from admission, with best practice targets of <36hours as a key marker of quality. As well as being detrimental to patient experience, delays in the time to operation have clear links to increased mortality rates. Method. We performed a retrospective audit of neck of femur fracture patients from 01.01.14 for 12 months, investigating time to theatre, other BPT targets, and attainment of BPT. A cost analysis was also performed from financial data. Results. Of 471 patients, 461 operations were performed. Our median time to surgery was 24.9 hours. 140 (30%) of patients were not operated on within 36 hours. 134 of these (96%) would have met the BPT had they been operated on within the 36 hour target i.e. all other BPT targets were met. This equates to a loss of £178,890. Conclusions. We achieved time to theatre target for 70% of patients (compared to 71.7% reported nationally), which is suboptimal. A solution is to dedicate more theatre time to hip fractures on theatre lists or lengthened daily trauma lists. However, at £1200 per hour running theatre, this on its own would not be cost effective. Improved theatre utilisation by 10% can potentially save the trust £3,960,000 in a year. We have put forward plans to audit our current theatre usage, potentially improving utilisation and efficiency (e.g. planned hip fracture first on list from previous day to avoid start delay). Additionally we have introduced a “Time of breach” onto our trauma board to concentrate attention on this part of best practice. Level of Evidence. Level 3

In recent years there has been growing interest in enhanced recovery regimes in lower limb arthroplasty due to potential clinical benefits of early mobilisation along with cost-savings. Following adoption of this regime in a district general hospital, it was observed that traditional dressings were a potential barrier to its success with ongoing wound problems in patients otherwise fit for discharge. The aim of this audit was to assess current wound care practice, implement a potentially improved regime and re-evaluate practice. A prospective clinical audit was performed over a three month period involving 100 patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Fifty patients with traditional dressings were evaluated prior to change in practice to a modern dressing (Aquacel™ Surgical). Fifty patients were then evaluated with the new dressing to complete the audit cycle. Clinical outcome measures included wear time, number of changes, blister rate and length of stay. Statistical comparisons were performed using Mann Whitney or Fisher's Exact test (statistical significance, p<0.05). Wear time for the traditional dressing (2 days) was significantly shorter than the modern dressing (7 days), p<0.001, and required more changes (0 vs. 3 days), p<0.001. 20% of patients developed blisters with the traditional dressing compared with 4% with the modern dressing (p=0.028). Length of stay was the same for the modern dressing (4 days) compared with the traditional dressing (4 days). However, in the modern group 75% of patients were discharged by day 4 whereas in the traditional group this took until day 6. This audit highlights the problems associated with traditional dressings with frequent early dressing changes, blistering and delayed discharge. These adverse outcomes can be minimised with a modern dressing specifically designed for the demands of lower limb arthroplasty. Units planning to implement enhanced recovery regimes should consider adopting this dressing to avoid compromising patient discharge

Hip fracture is a common and serious injury affecting the elderly. Many patients have co-morbidities which may need to be investigated and treated before surgery but, conversely, delay in surgical management of these patients leads to increased morbidity and mortality. The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (SHFA). 1. conducted in 2007 showed variations between hospitals in postponement rates for medical reasons. The report referred to 11 major clinical abnormalities described by McLaughlin. 2. that were associated with poor postoperative outcomes and should be corrected before surgery. This prospective audit took place in Monklands hospital for a duration of 6 weeks. All patients admitted to the orthopaedic firm from 14. th. Oct 2012 to 26. th. November 2012 with confirmed fracture neck of femur were prospectively included in the audit. A detailed review of the notes took place to identify whether delays were appropriate according to McLaughlin. There were a total of 23 patients admitted during the audit period of which 21 were operated on and 2 patients treated conservatively. The mean age of this cohort was 82.8 (range 55–91) with a male to female ratio of 1:1.3. Sixteen cases (76%) were operated on within 48 hours of admission (11 cases – 52% within 24 hours). Five cases (24%) were delayed by more than 48 hours. Three cases (14%) were delayed due to lack of theatre time. Two patients (9.5%) were delayed due to request of ECHO for ?new murmur. Our practice of managing hip fracture patients is similar to other units in Scotland with a deferral rate of approximately 25%. The patients who have a major clinical abnormality were appropriately investigated and treated before the surgery. Further improvement in management of the theatre time is needed as surgery is delayed for >24 hours in approximately 15% of medically fit hip fracture patients

Background. The Targon FN plate is a combination of the sliding hip screw and multiple cancellous screws. It is used in the fixation of intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur. The aim of this prospective audit was to assess clinical and radiological outcomes of Targon FN. Method. All patients who had a Targon FN fixation over a period of 18 months at a district general hospital were included. A pro forma was completed using medical records, including x-ray images. Results. Thirty-five patients were identified. Median (IQR) age was 73 (57–82). Median (IQR) waiting time for surgery was 27 hours (17–51). Median (IQR) operating time was 58 (50–65) minutes. The patients were followed up at 6, 12 18 and 24 months. Three cases of avascular necrosis were reported and two cases of non-union. Seven cases were found where the Targon FN was not used correctly. No cases of implant failure were reported where the Targon FN was used according to manufacture guidelines. Five revision surgeries took place or were being planned for cases of avascular necrosis, non union and symptomatic hardware. One case was identified which would have been better treated with a hemiarthroplasty than Targon FN. Conclusion. We recommend that the Targon FN plate continue to be used in our department. The success rate of the implant could be improved by educational workshops in our department to ensure that all surgeons adhere strictly to the operating technique described by the manufacturer. We recommend continuing careful selection of patients for Targon FN and to continue a follow up to 24 months

Collection of new data for the Scottish hip fracture audit stopped in December 2008. The proposed standard of operating on 98% of all hip fractures within 24 hours of admission, subject to medical fitness and during safe operating hours should now be maintained. Methods. We prospectively collected data from 102 consecutive hip fracture patients documenting the patient's journey from admission to discharge from the orthopaedic ward to look at whether the standard had been maintained. Results. 50% of patients get to theatre 24hrs or earlier with 60% catheterised perioperatively.50% of patients were moved from the acute orthopaedic facility at a week with less than 20% of these getting back to their usual place of residence. 25% were still on the acute ward at two weeks and 3% died in the immediate post operative period. However, the number of co-morbidities did not seem to correlate with time to discharge. The majority of patients transferred to onward care moved to the geriatric rehabilitation ward within the hospital. Prioritisation of hip fracture patients on the trauma list needs to be continued along with improvements in the availability of rehabilitation beds. Pre-operative medical work up for patients with reversible illness and post-operative geriatric care will improve the outcomes for these frail patients

Background. A dedicated referral pathway for patients with bony metastases was introduced at Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospitals (GSTT) in 2009. The aim was to facilitate prompt, consultant-led decision-making and intervention for patients at risk of pathological fracture of long bones. Methods. We performed a clinical audit and service evaluation of the referral pathway through retrospective review of referrals over 3.5 years. Results. 75 patients referred from 7 different specialties, (34:41 male:female), mean age 64. 16 different types of primary cancer identified, the most common being breast (22/75). Location of metastasis was most commonly the femur (59/75). 24 patients underwent surgery, with femoral nail the most common procedure (13/24). Patients in the surgery group were younger, with higher Mirel's score, less visceral metastases and survived longer after surgery than patients treated non-operatively. Median referral-clinic time was 10 days and referral-surgery time was 14 days. Conclusions. Our data demonstrate the importance of this service and the growing demand. We have updated trust guidelines and improved our referral process through GSTT's Electronic Patient Record system. We have presented this data at local level to improve awareness and intend to reduce referral-clinical review time and have recently established a multidisciplinary meeting to improve patient outcome. Level of Evidence. 3

Hip fractures are a common injury in elderly patients. The UK has a National Hip Fracture Database to collect data on all patients presenting to hospital with a hip fracture. Literature evidence suggests that early surgery for hip fracture patients improves morbidity and mortality. UK national guidelines (BOA, NICE) recommend that surgery is performed within 36 hours of presentation and/or diagnosis for inpatients. Best Practice Tariffs ensure that hospitals are paid a set value if they meet this target of surgery within 36 hours. This study aims to look at reasons for delay to surgery for patients presenting to our busy level 2 trauma unit.

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for patients referred to the orthopaedic team at our hospital with a diagnosis of a neck of femur fracture between 1st April and 31st December 2018. Patients under the age of 65 year of age were excluded from our study. Only patients who were operated on after 36 hours were included. The database for reasons of surgical delay was reviewed and electronic patient records were used to collect further data on length of stay and 30-day mortality.

A total of 249 patients were diagnosed with a hip fracture during the study period. 2 patients were too unwell for an operation and died within 24 hours of diagnosis/admission. 46 patients were included in the study. The primary reasons for surgical delay were patients not being fit for surgery (14/46) and the use of anti-coagulation (14/46). Other reasons included a lack of surgical capacity (7/46) and delayed diagnosis due to further imaging (CT). Mean delay to surgery was 51.8 hours (range 34.5 – 157.2 hours; median 42.9 hours), mean length of stay 20.4 days (range 5.3 – 55.7 days, median 15.6 days). 30-day mortality was 4/46 (8.6%) for patients who were delayed

Many of the issues we found in this study are unusual however these problems are commonly faced in many level 2 trauma units that serve an ever growing ageing population. Changing practice to provide improved out-of-hours medical care to facilitate medical optimisation and using current literature evidence that shows that the use of DOACs/NOACs does not adversely affect outcomes when patients are operated on within 24 hours of the last dose may help improve times to surgery.

Open talus fracture are notoriously difficult to manage and they are commonly associated with a high level of complications including non-union, avascular necrosis and infection. Currently, the management of such injuries is based upon BOAST 4 guidelines although there is no suggested definitive management, thus definitive management is based upon surgeon preference. The key principles of open talus fracture management which do not vary between surgeons, however, there is much debate over whether the talus should be preserved or removed after open talus fracture/dislocation and proceeded to tibiocalcaneal fusion.

A review of electronic hospital records for open talus fractures from 2014-2021 returned foureen patients with fifteen open talus fractures. Seven cases were initially managed with ORIF, five cases were definitively managed with FUSION, while the others were managed with alternative methods. We collected patient's age, gender, surgical complications, surgical risk factors and post-treatment functional ability and pain and compliance with BOAST guidelines. The average follow-up of the cohort was four years and one month. EQ-5D-5L and FAAM-ADL/Sports score was used as a patient reported outcome measure. Data was analysed using the software PRISM.

Comparison between FUSION and ORIF groups showed no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-5L score (P = 0.13), FAAM-ADL (P = 0.20), FAAM-Sport (P = 0.34), infection rate (P = 0.55), surgical times (P = 0.91) and time to weight bearing (P = 0.39), despite a higher proportion of polytrauma and Hawkins III and IV fractures in the FUSION group.

FUSION is typically used as second line to ORIF or failed ORIF. However, there are a lack of studies that directly compared outcome in open talus fracture patients definitively managed with FUSION or ORIF. Our results demonstrate for the first time, that FUSION may not be inferior to ORIF in terms of patient functional outcome, infection rate, and quality-of-life, in the management of patients with open talus fracture patients. Of note, as open talus fractures have increased risks of complications such as osteonecrosis and non-union, FUSION should be considered as a viable option to mitigate these potential complications in these patients.

Neck of femur fractures are a common presentation and certain patients can be managed with a total hip replacement. To receive a total hip replacement the pelvic X-rays should be templated as per AO guidelines and a common way this is performed is by including a calibration marker on the X-ray. The aim of this study is to assess and improve upon the use of the calibration marker.

Details of patients admitted with a neck of femur fracture from January 1st 2018 until December 31st 2018 were gathered and used to review each initial X-ray and determine if a calibration marker was included. 376 patients were admitted with a neck of femur fracture over the one year period. 36% of patients did not have a calibration marker on their initial pelvic X-ray and 11% did not have a chest X ray. 215 patients had an intracapsular fracture and 39 went on to have a total hip replacement. 12 patients were lacking a calibration marker on their original X ray and required a repeat X ray. After a poster was placed in the radiographer booth acting as a visual aid, the use of a calibration marker improved from 62% to 70%.

Calibration markers are useful tools which can aid the pre-operative planning for hip replacement surgeries shortening operative time, increase precision and reduce prosthetic loosening, lowers the risk of peri-prosthetic fractures, reduce leg length discrepancy and ensure the required implants are available. If a marker is not included on the initial X-rays, and a patient has a neck of femur fracture which requires a joint replacement, they may have to have additional X-rays performed as was the case for 12 patients in this study. This process leads to possible delays in surgery, additional radiation and increased healthcare costs.

Due to working time restrictions a full-shift cross-covering system is commonplace. As more than one surgeon is responsible for trauma admissions in a 24-hour period a complete handover is paramount to ensure continuity of care. The purpose of this audit was to determine whether the introduction of a formal handover/admission form would improve this continuity with regards to prescription of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hip fracture patients. In Stirling Royal Infirmary chemical VTE prophylaxis for hip fracture patients is 40mg enoxaparin at 6pm unless there is a contraindication. Over a 14-day period we prospectively documented the prescription of VTE prophylaxis and doses missed under the current admissions system. Following this a proforma was introduced that was to be exchanged at handover meetings. The proforma included patients' name/details, admission ward, and tasks to be completed during clerk-in, including VTE prophylaxis prescription. Tasks outstanding at handover had to be documented and completed by the subsequent doctor. Each form was signed and dated by the receiving doctor. We subsequently re-evaluated the prescription of VTE prophylaxis in hip fracture patients. Between 1/12/10-15/12/10, 23 patients were admitted with hip fracture. 12 had appropriate VTE prophylaxis, 6 missed one dose, 4 missed two, and 1 missed three all due to failure of prescription. Following the introduction of the proforma, 12 patients were admitted with hip fractures between 31/12/10-14/1/11. All were prescribed appropriate VTE prophylaxis and missed no doses. 1 patient was on warfarin and had enoxaparin prescribed but withheld until INR< 2.0. After the introduction of a handover form VTE prophylaxis prescription vastly improved. This proforma ensured that all elements of initial management were completed allowing for physician accountability, greater efficacy of handover and continuity of care

We undertook a retrospective audit to assess quality of service provided by Nurse-Led Review Clinic at Glasgow Royal Infirmary for patients sustaining ankle fracture requiring surgical stabilisation. Nursing staff had received training from the senior author regarding clinical examination and radiograph interpretation. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical documentation and radiographs of 104 patients who attended from January 2009 to December 2009. Any clinical issues were identified and radiographs were scrutinised by two of the authors to assess accuracy of interpretation. Nurse-led management was then assessed as to its appropriateness. Finally two retrospective questionnaires were used to assess both the nurses and patients satisfaction with the clinic. Nurse-led clinic protocol: First appointment 10 days: Wound review, application of lightweight plaster. Second appointment 6 weeks: Removal of plaster, check radiographs. Final appointment 12 weeks: Clinical assessment, radiographs, discharge. Clinical assessment: ensure wound satisfactory, range of movement and weight-bearing are improving. Radiographic criteria: 6 weeks: Assess for talar shift, lucency or metal-work concerns. 12 weeks: Assess evidence of fracture union, infection, loosening or backing out. If any concerns with the patients' progress nursing staff would discuss with the consultant. First appointment: 7 wound problems. 5 managed by nurses and resolved. 2 discussed with surgeon, 1 settled, 1 required oral antibiotics. 3 radiographs discussed with surgeon. 2 conservative management. 1 re-operation. Second appointment: 7 wounds managed by nurses. 1 failure of fixation, discussed for re-operation. 2 concerns regarding metal in joint – treated conservatively. Final appointment: 7 referred to physiotherapy as slow to fully weight-bear. 5 discussed for removal of syndesmosis screw. 1 screw in joint, admitted for re-operation. Clinical care provided at Nurse-Led clinic is appropriate and effective. Both nursing staff and patients were satisfied with the care provided. Nurse-led clinic reduces demands on fracture clinic appointments and is a safe, cost effective initiative