Background. The surgical management of musculoskeletal tumours is a challenging problem, particularly in pelvic and diaphyseal tumour resection where accurate determination of bony transection points is extremely important to optimise oncologic, functional and reconstructive options. The use of computer assisted navigation in these cases could improve surgical precision. Materials and methods. We resected musculoskeletal tumours in fifteen patients using commercially available computer navigation software (Orthomap 3D). Results. Of the eight pelvic tumours, three underwent biological reconstruction with extra corporeal irradiation, three endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) and two required no bony reconstruction. Four diaphyseal tumours had biological reconstruction. Two patients with proximal femoral sarcoma underwent extra-articular resection and EPR. One soft tissue sarcoma of the adductor compartment involving the femur was resected with EPR. Histological examination of the resected specimens revealed tumour free margins in all cases. Post-operative radiographs and CT show resection and reconstruction as planned in all cases. Several learning points were identified related to juvenile bony anatomy and intra-operative registration. Discussion. The use of computer navigation in musculoskeletal oncology allows integration of local anatomy and tumour extent to identify resection margins accurately. Furthermore, it can aid in reconstruction following tumour resection. Our experience thus far has been encouraging

Surgical training has been greatly affected by the challenges of reduced training opportunities, shortened working hours, and financial pressures. There is an increased need for the use of training system in developing psychomotor skills of the surgical trainee for fracture fixation. The training system was developed to simulate dynamic hip screw fixation. 12 orthopaedic senior house officers performed dynamic hip screw fixation before and after the training on training system. The results were assessed based on the scoring system that included the amount of time taken, accuracy of guide wire placement and the number of exposures requested to complete the procedure. The result shows a significant improvement in amount of time taken, accuracy of fixation and the number of exposures after the training on simulator system. This was statistically significant using paired student t-test (p-value <0.05).

Computer navigated training system appears to be a good training tool for young orthopaedic trainees The system has the potential to be used in various other orthopaedic procedures for learning of technical skills aimed at ensuring a smooth escalation in task complexity leading to the better performance of procedures in the operating theatre.

To confirm whether developmental dysplasia of the hip has a risk of hip impingement, we analysed maximum ranges of movement to the point of bony impingement, and impingement location using three-dimensional (3D) surface models of the pelvis and femur in combination with 3D morphology of the hip joint using computer-assisted methods. Results of computed tomography were examined for 52 hip joints with DDH and 73 normal healthy hip joints. DDH shows larger maximum extension (p = 0.001) and internal rotation at 90° flexion (p < 0.001). Similar maximum flexion (p = 0.835) and external rotation (p = 0.713) were observed between groups, while high rates of extra-articular impingement were noticed in these directions in DDH (p < 0.001). Smaller cranial acetabular anteversion (p = 0.048), centre-edge angles (p < 0.001), a circumferentially shallower acetabulum, larger femoral neck anteversion (p < 0.001), and larger alpha angle were identified in DDH. Risk of anterior impingement in retroverted DDH hips is similar to that in retroverted normal hips in excessive adduction but minimal in less adduction. These findings might be borne in mind when considering the possibility of extra-articular posterior impingement in DDH being a source of pain, particularly for patients with a highly anteverted femoral neck.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:580–9.

We have investigated the benefits of patient specific instrument guides, applied to osteotomies around the knee. Single, dual and triple planar osteotomies were performed on tibias or femurs in 14 subjects. In all patients, a detailed pre-operative plan was prepared based upon full leg standing radiographic and CT scan information. The planned level of the osteotomy and open wedge resection was relayed to the surgery by virtue of a patient specific guide developed from the images. The mean deviation between the planned wedge angle and the executed wedge angle was 0° (-1 to 1, sd 0.71) in the coronal plane and 0.3° (-0.9 to 3, sd 1.14) in the sagittal plane. The mean deviation between the planned hip, knee, ankle angle (HKA) on full leg standing radiograph and the post-operative HKA was 0.3° (-1 to 2, sd 0.75). It is concluded that this is a feasible and valuable concept from the standpoint of pre-operative software based planning, surgical application and geometrical accuracy of outcome.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:153–8.

Abstract. Introduction. Component mal-positioning in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) can increase the risk of revision for various reasons. Compared to conventional surgery, relatively improved accuracy of implant positioning can be achieved using computer assisted technologies including navigation, patient-specific jigs, and robotic systems. However, it is not known whether application of these technologies has improved prosthesis survival in the real-world. This study aimed to compare risk of revision for all-causes following primary THR and TKR, and revision for dislocation following primary THR performed using computer assisted technologies compared to conventional technique. Methods. We performed an observational study using National Joint Registry data. All adult patients undergoing primary THR and TKR for osteoarthritis between 01/04/2003 to 31/12/2020 were eligible. Patients who received metal-on-metal bearing THR were excluded. We generated propensity score weights, using Sturmer weight trimming, based on: age, gender, ASA grade, side, operation funding, year of surgery, approach, and fixation. Specific additional variables included position and bearing for THR and patellar resurfacing for TKR. For THR, effective sample sizes and duration of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided and robotic-assisted analyses were 9,379 and 10,600 procedures, and approximately 18 and 4 years, respectively. For TKR, effective sample sizes and durations of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided, patient-specific jigs, and robotic-assisted groups were 92,579 procedures over 18 years, 11,665 procedures over 8 years, and 644 procedures over 3 years, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. For THR, analysis comparing computer-guided versus conventional technique demonstrated HR of 0.771 (95%CI 0.573–1.036) p=0.085, and 0.594 (95%CI 0.297–1.190) p=0.142, for revision for all-causes and dislocation, respectively. When comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique, HR for revision for all-causes was 0.480 (95%CI 0.067 –3.452) p=0.466. For TKR, compared to conventional surgery, HR for all-cause revision for procedures performed using computer guidance and patient-specific jigs were 0.967 (95% CI 0.888–1.052) p=0.430, and 0.937 (95% CI 0.708–1.241) p=0.65, respectively. HR for analysis comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique was 2.0940 (0.2423, 18.0995) p = 0.50. Conclusions. This is the largest study investigating this topic utilising propensity score analysis methods. We did not find a statistically significant difference in revision for all-causes and dislocation although these analyses are underpowered to detect smaller differences in effect size between groups. Additional comparison for revision for dislocation between robotic-assisted versus conventionally performed THR was not performed as this is a subset of revision for all-causes and wide confidence intervals were already observed for that analysis. It is also important to mention this NJR analysis study is of an observational study design which has inherent limitations. Nonetheless, this is the most feasible study design to answer this research question requiring use of a large data set due to revision being a rare outcome. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Study design. Literature review of the best available evidence on the accuracy of computer assisted pedicle screw insertion. Background. Pedicle screw misplacement rates with the conventional insertion technique and adequate postoperative CT examination have ranged from 5 to 29 % in the cervical spine, from 3 to 58 % in the thoracic spine, and from 6 to 41% in the lumbosacral region. Despite these relatively high perforation rates, the incidence of reported screw-related complications has remained low. Interestingly, the highest rates of neurovascular injuries have been reported from the lumbosacral spine in up to 17% of the patients. Gertzbein and Robbins introduced a 4-mm “safe zone” in the thoracolumbar spine for medial encroachment, consisting of 2-mm of epidural and 2-mm of subarachnoid space. Later, several authors have found the safety margins to be significantly smaller, suggesting that the “safe zone” thresholds of Gertzbein and Robbins do not apply to the thoracic spine, and seem to be too high even for the lumbar spine. The midthoracic and midcervical spine, as well as the thoracolumbar junction set the highest demands for accuracy in pedicle screw insertion, with no room for either translational or rotational error at e.g. T5 level. Computer assisted pedicle screw insertion (navigation) was introduced in the early 90's to increase the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion. Material. PubMed literature search revealed two randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the in vivo accuracy of conventional and computer assisted pedicle screw insertion techniques. Three meta-analyses have assessed the published reports on the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with or without computer assistance, one additional meta-analysis concentrated on the functional outcome of computer assisted pedicle screw insertion. Results. The RCTs by Laine et al and Rajasekaran et al achieved significantly higher screw placement accuracy with computer assistance than with the conventional techniquebased on anatomical landmarks. In a degenerative patient population, Laine et al reported a misplacement rate of 4.6% with computer assistance compared to 13.4% with the conventional technique. In addition to this quantitative difference, a qualitative difference in the misplaced screws was noticed: in the conventional group, 28 out of 37 misplaced screws were either inferior or medial, whereas in the computer assisted group, 1 out of 10 misplaced screws was situated in these ”danger zones”. In deformity surgery, Rajasekaran et al reported a 2% pedicle screw misplacement rate with a computer assisted technique compared to 23% with the conventional technique. Interestingly, in their study, the average screw insertion time in the computer assisted group was significantly shorter than with the conventional technique. The three meta-analyses, assessing up to 37 337 pedicle screws, reported significantly higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws with computerassistance compared with the conventional methods. The superiority of the computer assisted technique was even more obvious with abnormal surgical anatomy. CT-based and 3D-fluoroscopy-based navigation methods provided better accuracy compared to 2Dfluoroscopy-based navigation. No statistically significant benefit with computer assistance in the incidence of neuro-vascular complications, or in functional outcome was demonstrated. Conclusion. High pedicle screw misplacement rates have been reported with the conventional technique based on anatomical landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. The concept of ”safe zone” is hypothetical, and underestimates the true risks of misplaced pedicle screws. Computer assistance significantly improves the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion. It will, however, be difficult to correlate this increased accuracy to improved patient outcomes

Background: The use of sacro-iliac screws to restore the stability of posterior pelvic ring dissociations has become a standard technique. Several methods are described including fluoroscopy, CT and computer assisted techniques. Fluoroscopically assisted insertion is the standard technique. Multiple exposures of ionising radiation permit acquisition of a target in sequential planes, requiring a process of interpolation for 3-D localisation. A computer assisted technique facilitates the simultaneous visualisation of multiple planes following a single image intensifier acquisition and registration process in each plane. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the accuracy of a computer assisted surgery technique and quantify the predicted reduction in radiation exposure. Methods: 10 embalmed human cadavers were used. In each specimen, a sacro-iliac screw was simulated by passing a 5mm reamer over a 3.2mm guide wire. The index track was formed with a closely sheathed 4.8mm drill and was inserted with the standard fluoroscopically assisted technique in the left hemipelvis and a computer assisted technique(Vector Vision trauma) on the right. Registration of the system is achieved by the placement of infra red reflective arrays on all tracked objects. These include the right and left hemi-pelvis, the fluoroscope, the drill guide and the driver unit. The system is an open platform which registers arrays of known geometry whilst permitting the registration of instruments by means of an instrument calibration matrix. The pelvic T and Y pattern fiducials are fixed rigidly to inter-table threaded pins at the level of the gluteal tuberosities. The standard acquisition projections are inlet and outlet views for both techniques with the addition of lateral projections although the latter were not directly used for navigation. Postoperative CT scans demonstrate the actual tracks and analysis is facilitated by means of a digital mapping technique. Results: The accuracy of the fluoroscopically assisted and computer assisted techniques is identical. The procedure time was significantly longer for the computer assisted technique although most of the additional time was accounted for by the “line of sight” registration process. There was a reduction in both the total screening time and the measured radiation dose in the case of the computer assisted technique although this did not reach statistical significance as the sample size is relatively small. Conclusions: The navigation of sacro-iliac screw tracks by means of both fluoroscopically assisted and computer assisted techniques proves equally accurate in a human cadaveric model

Introduction: Obesity [Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30] is seen in a growing percentage of patients seeking joint replacement surgery. Recent studies have shown no clear influence of obesity on the five-year, clinical outcome of total knee replacement; except for the morbidly obese (BMI > 40). Computer navigation has shown improved consistency of prosthetic component alignment. However, this aid does significantly increase operation time. Aims:. To compare tourniquet times of standard and computer assisted total knee arthroplasty in patients with BMI more than 30. To evaluate the change in this variable as a surgeon gained experience over a three year period. Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis of 82, obese, total knee replacements performed by a single surgeon, at a dedicated arthroplasty centre, was undertaken. Conventional knee replacement instrumentation (Plus Orthopaedics, UK) was used in 42 cases and computer assisted navigation (Galileo- Plus Orthopaedics) in 39 cases. The patients were divided into three equal sized groups (1, 2 & 3), in chronological order. Each group comprised fourteen knees undertaken using standard surgical technique and thirteen knees using computer assisted navigation. Group1 had average tourniquet times of 95.69 and 111.67 minutes in the standard and computer assisted groups respectively (p 0.01). Group 2 tourniquet times were 80.75 and 92.33 minutes (p 0.05). Group 3 tourniquet times were 84.5 and 87.5 minutes; these were not significantly different. Conclusions: As the surgeon acquired experience of computer assisted navigation, his tourniquet times decreased and by the end of our study period, there was no longer any difference between the tourniquet times for conventional and computer assisted knee replacement in this subgroup of obese patients. We hypothesise that in obese patients, computer assisted navigation helps the surgeon to overcome jig alignment uncertainty and thus improves accuracy of component alignment without any significant time penalty

Computer assisted surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty have demonstrated increased accuracy of alignment and decreased risk of outliers. Some studies have also demonstrated improved early functional results and pain scores in comparison to traditional surgical methods. Studies have also shown a slightly increased surgical time for computer assisted surgery. A learning curve for computer assisted surgery is recognized, and there may be different outcomes for cases performed initially during the learning phase. This study reports on a single surgeon’s experience with the initial 261 computer assisted total knee arthroplasties. A single experienced, fellowship trained surgeon performed computer assisted total knee arthroplasty utilizing either the BrainLab or Ci intraoperative navigation system and either the LCS Complete Mobile Bearing Knee System (DePuy) or Sigma PFC Rotating Platform (DePuy). Preoperative and postoperative data was recorded prospectively (DePuy Captureware) of the initial 261 consecutive cases at minimum of one year follow-up. SAS 9.1 was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses of four groups of patients: patients 1–77, patients 78–135, patients 136–211 and patients 212–261. Multivariate analyses were performed to control for body mass index, age, sex, implant type, pre-operative range of motion, preoperative function and preoperative pain scores. Multivariate analysis of these four groups demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference in the improvement of postoperative function (p=0.29) and pain scores (p=0.28) among the patients in the four groups at minimum one year follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference in improvement of postoperative extension (p=0.0022) and flexion (p=0.0139) scores with subsequent surgeries, however the range of improvement for the groups was not clinically significant (extension ranging from 1.97 to 5.92 degrees gained in the four groups, and flexion loss of 0.67 degrees to gain of 6.18 degrees in the four groups). The number of patients requiring a hospitalization greater than two days decreased with each subsequent group which was clinically significant (p=0.021, p=0.001, p< 0.0001 for the second, third and fourth groups, respectively). For an experienced reconstructive surgeon incorporating computer assisted surgery into his total knee arthroplasty practice, there is no significant learning curve in regards to intermediate term outcomes. Patients undergoing computer assisted total knee arthroplasty have similar intermediate outcomes whether performed earlier in that surgeon’s experience or later. Patients did initially have shorter hospitalization stays in subsequent groups. However, at an intermediate follow-up period of one year, there is no significant difference in patients’ postoperative improvement in function, pain score, knee flexion and knee extension

We present minimum 20 year results of a randomized, prospective double blinded trial (RCT) of cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene (PE), using a computer assisted method of PE wear measurement. After Ethics Committee approval, 122 patients were enrolled into an RCT comparing Enduron (non cross-linked PE) and highly cross-linked Marathon PE (DePuy, Leeds, UK). Other than the PE liners, identical components were used, a Duraloc 300 metal shell with one screw, a 28mm CoCr femoral head and a cemented Charnley Elite femoral stem. All patients were followed with anteroposterior (A∼P) and lateral radiographs at 3 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 and 20 years. PE wear was measured with PolyMig, which has a phantom validated accuracy of ± 0.09mm. At minimum 20 year follow-up, 47 patients had died, 5 of which had been revised prior to their death. Another 32 patients were revised and alive, leaving 43 patients unrevised and alive (15 Enduron, 28 Marathon). No patients were lost to follow-up, but 2 were not able to be radiographed (dementia), leaving 41 patients (15 Enduron, 26 Marathon) available for PE wear measurement. After the bedding-in period, Enduron liners had a wear rate of 0.182 mm/year, and Marathon liners had a wear rate of 0.028 mm/year. At 20 years follow-up, 37 patients had required revision. Patients with conventional PE had three times the revision rate (28/37) of those who received XLPE (9/37). This is the longest term RCT showing substantially improved clinical and radiological results when XLPE is used as the bearing surface

Since 2000 we have performed TKR with the aid of a computer assisted navigation system (PiGalileo). Over this time we have made more than 2000 TKR, while continuing to monitor results from both standard technique and computer navigated TKR. As we began to work with the computer assisted navigation system, we ran a comparison trial to ascertain the accuracy of mechanical axis calculation. The trial comprised of 32 patients. The accuracy of the calculation in both techniques was measured by paralax-free X-ray. The computer assisted navigation group showed a deviation of 0.9°–2.5°, whereas the standard technique group showed a deviation of 3.5°–4.6°. A second comparison was conducted involving 186 patients. The TKR were performed from August 2000 to December 2001. All patients received the same implant (TC-Solution). All operations were performed by the hospital’s two most senior surgeons. Cases involving deviations from our standard TKR (such as patellar replacement) were eliminated from the trial. Two groups were created randomly:. Group A (88 patients) standard technique. Group B (98 patients) technique with the aid of computer assisted navigation system. All patients were examined by an independent doctor, in accordance with a clearly defined protocol. Preoperative and postoperative clinical examinations with X-rays were made. Check ups with valuation of the KSS score (Insall) and HSS Knee score (Ranavate and Shine) followed after 3,6,12,24 and 60 months. Both groups have comparable biometric data. In the post-surgery checks we found noticeable differences in the axis positions of the legs and the ventral cutting plane in favour of group B. This group showed better clinical results and patient satisfaction. There was no difference in the outcome in case of retropatelar problems, as the first generation software did not permit rotation assessment of the prosthesis. The current version of the system allows this assessment. The results of our clincal observations confirm the advantage of computer navigated TKR. It has become our standard operating method. The navigation system is reliable, warrants better axis and rotation positioning of the prosthesis; exact cutting planes, and consequently, exact setting of the implants. Through progressive development of the navigation system and refined surgical techniques in relation to computer assisted TKR, we have reduced the average TKR operating time

Background. Limb length discrepancy after total hip replacement is one of the possible complications of suboptimal positioning of the implant and cause of patients dissatisfaction. Computer assisted navigation become affirmed in last years for total hip replacement surgery and it is also used for the evaluation of the intra-operative limb length discrepancy. The purpose of this study is to verify the reliability of a navigation system with a dedicated software in intraoperative evaluation of limb lengthening and offset as compared with manual technique. Methods. Forty patients who underwent a Total Hip Arthroplasty in our institution were entrolled in this study. Twenty patients were evaluated with pre operative manual planning (group A) and treated with hand positioning of femoral stem. Twenty Patient were evaluated with preoperative manual planning and treated with Computer assisted navigation of Stem (group B). Mean operating time and blood loss were analyzed. Radiological and clinical follow up was made at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative to assess any mismatch of implant, complications and clinical results that was measured with Harris Hip Score. Results. In the evaluation of the limb length and offset in group A there wasn't significance difference between pre and postoperative measurements obtained with manual planning. Also in group B there wasn't a significance difference between the measurement obtained intraoperative with computer assisted navigation and the one obtainedafter surgery and preoperative with manual planning. In any case we noted a limb length discrepancy in this series. No statistically significance difference was noted between the two groups in relations to the others parameters investigated. Conclusions. Based on our study the computer navigation system is a simple and reliable for the evaluation of limb length discrepancy and offset in total hip replacement. This Navigation system can offer to the surgeon a valid intraoperative information that can reduce possible errors in stem positioning and can reduce rate of length discrepancy

Background. Stress fractures at tracker after computer navigated total knee replacement are rare. Periprosthetic fracture after Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of stress fracture through femoral tracker is unique in orthopaedic literature. We are reporting this unique presentation of periprosthetic fractures after MIPO for stress fracture involving femoral pin site track in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty, treated by reconstruction nail (PFNA). Methods. A 75-year old female, who had computer navigated right total knee replacement, was admitted 6 weeks later with increasing pain over distal thigh for 3 weeks without trauma. Prior to onset of pain, she achieved a range of movements of 0–105 degrees. Perioperative radiographs did not suggest obvious osteoporosis, pre-existent benign or malignant lesion, or fracture. Radiographs demonstrated transverse fracture of distal third of femur through pin site track. We fixed the fracture with 11-hole combihole locking plate by MIPO technique. Eight weeks later, she was readmitted with periprosthetic fracture through screw hole at the tip of MIPO Plate and treated by Reconstruction Nail (PFNA), removal of locking screws and refixation of intermediate segment with unicortical locking screws. Then she was protected with plaster cylinder for 4 weeks and hinged brace for 2 months. Results. Retrograde nail for navigation pin site stress fracture entails intraarticular approach with attendant risks including scatches to prosthesis and joint infection. So we opted to fix by MIPO technique. Periprosthetic fracture at the top of MIPO merits fixation with antegrade nail in conjunction with conversion of screws in the proximal part of the plate to unicortical locking screws. Overlap of at least 3cms offers biomechanical superiority. She made an uneventful recovery and was started on osteoporosis treatment, pending DEXA scan. Conclusion. Reconstruction Nail (PFNA), refixation of intermediate segment with unicortical locking screws constitutes a logical management option for the unique periprosthetic fracture after MIPO of stress fracture involving femoral pin site track in computer assisted total knee replacement

Introduction. Post traumatic arthritis of the knee can be a conseguence of distal femur fracture and retained hardware can complicate any further surgical option including arthroplasty. Both staged surgical procedures to remove before the hardware or simultaneous procedure of arthroplasty and removal of hardware have been indicated with an increased risk of complications. Aim of this study is to present a consecutive series of TKA following distal femur fracture using a computer assisted technique without the removal of retained hardware assessing both the efficacy of navigation in managing these complex cases as “routinary” primary arthroplasties. Material and Methods. A consecutive series of 16 patients treated with a computer assisted TKR following femoral fracture and with retained hardware were included in the study (group A). The interval between the fracture and operation averaged 5.8 years (range 1–12 years), the retained hardwares was an intramedullary nail in 6 cases, distal lateral plates in 7 cases and screws in 4 cases. All patients in group A were matched with a patient who had undergone to a computer assisted TKR using the same implant and software because of atraumatic knee arthritis in the same period (group B). Patients were matched in terms of age, gender, pre-operative range of motion, pre-operative arthritis severity according to Albaack classification, type and grade of deformity and implant features (cruciate retaining or sacrificing). There were 10 male and 6 female for each group, the mean pre-operative age was 64.3 years (range: 54–72) for the group A and 65.4 years (range: 53–74) for the group B. The mean pre-operative flexion was 85.5 degrees (range: 65–115) and 88.1 degrees (range: 70–115) for the post traumatic group and the matched group respectively. Results. There were no statistical significant differences in surgical time, hospital staying, intra/post operative complications. Likewise at a mean follow-up of 47 months no statistically significant difference was seen for the Knee Society, Functional, GIUM and WOMAC scores between the 2 groups. Implant alignment was similar between the 2 groups with similar radiological parameters. Conclusions. The results of this study demonstrated that knee arthritis following distal femoral fracture can be safely managed using computer assisted TKA without any need of hardware removal and obvious costs savings. The Authors achieved both same results and same complication rate of similar uncomplicated primary TKR

To prospectively evaluate the accuracy as well as patient outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement in a multi-centric randomised study. Two hundred and ninety-five patients in six European centers were randomised between two groups: One hundred and forty-seven in the conventional surgery group and one hundred and forty-eight in the computer assisted surgery. Radiological as well as clinical data (SF-36 and KSS scores) were collected preoperatively as well as six weeks and six months postoperatively. A multilevel mixed-effects linear regression for nested variable with random-effects was used to estimate the effect of the independent variable (type of surgery: conventional surgery vs computer assisted surgery) on each of the dependent variables at six weeks and six months post-operatively. Mechanical axis was statistically better in the navigation group at six weeks (p=0,01) and six months (p=0,04). Similar results are found for the femoral component at six months (p=0,001). At six months, there were statistically greater improvements in the following SF-36 scales for the computer assisted group: bodily pain (p=0,03), role emotional (p=0,03), mental health (p< 0,001), physical health dimension (p=0,01), mental health dimension (p=0,005) and global SF36 score (p=0,002). While a difference in operating time was noted (p< 10-5), the blood losses where similar for both groups (p=0.8). Computer assisted surgery improves the accuracy in total knee arthroplasty, especially for the mechanical axis and the femoral component orientation. These improvements result in better quality of life for the patient at six months postoperatively. Level of Evidence: I – High-quality randomised controlled trial with statistically significant difference

Objective:. Periacetabular spherical osteotomy for the treatment of dysplastic hip is effective but technically demanding. To help surgeons perform this difficult procedure reliably and safely, a computer assisted navigation technique has been developed and evaluated. Methods:. Computed tomographic scans of 5 cadaveric pelvises were obtained and three-dimensional models were generated. The osteotomy was planned preoperatively. The pelvises were registered using an optimized algorithm. Periacetabular spherical osteotomy was performed at one side of each pelvis with navigation and at another side without navigation. The deviation of the real osteotomized surface from the planned surface was measured. Results:. The computer assisted navigation system supported preoperative planning and provided real time display of the surgical procedure. The deviation of the real osteotomized surface from the planned surface was 1.59 ± 0.18 mm in the group with navigation, while 4.81 ± 1.67 mm in the group without navigation. The difference of the deviations has statistical significance (p < 0.003). Conclusion:. A computer assisted navigation technique is able to help increase accuracy and safety of periacetabular spherical osteotomy, and thus facilitate performing this difficult procedure

Introduction: There has been significant development in computer technology in recent years and this has led to applications in orthopaedic surgery. Of particular interest is computer assisted joint arthroplasty to enable accurate insertion of the components based on CT generated images of the patient’s bones. Methods: Twenty-five patients have undergone computer assisted total knee arthroplasty using a computer guidance system (Vector Vision, Brain Lab, Munich) implanting a PFC cruciate retaining total knee replacement (TKR) (Depuy, Leeds). Pre-operative CT scans were obtained from each patient and alignment and sizing were calculated before surgery. Intra-operatively, an infrared camera tracked the instruments and the patient’s limb was accurately mapped in space by surface matching the bone and comparing it with the CT scan. For the purpose of the study the computer generated alignments and sizing were evaluated along with the use of traditional instruments and stored in a database. Results: These have been evaluated comparing computer assisted and instrumented knee arthroplasty. Variables measured include the AP femoral cuts, rotational femoral alignment, and tibial axis alignment in AP and lateral planes. Conclusions: Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery has undergone a rapid development in the last 18 months to enable real-time intra-operative images to be viewed in a moving limb with a degree of accuracy previously not possible. The use of this technology may lead to more accurate alignment of hip and knee prostheses and therefor help to reduce wear in the long-term

To determine the precision of conventional versus computer assisted techniques for positioning the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malposition of the acetabular component during THA increases the occurrence of impingement, reduces range of motion, and increases the risk of dislocation and long-term wear. To prevent malpositioned hip implants, an increasing number of computer assisted surgery systems have been described, but their accuracy is not well established. Using a lateral approach, 150 cups were placed by 10 different surgeons in 10 identical plastic pelvis models. Only the immediate operating field was visible. Pre-operative planning was performed with a computerised tomography scan. Fifty cups were placed free hand, 50 others with the standard cup positioner, and the remaining 50 cups using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (Medivision). The accuracy of cup abduction and anteversion was assessed with an electromagnetic system (Fastrak™). Using conventional techniques, free hand placement revealed a mean precision of cup anteversion and abduction of 10° (range 5.5 to 14) and 3.5° (2.5 to 5) respectively. With the cup positioner, these angles measured 8° (5 to 10.5) and 4° (3 to 5.5) respectively, and using the computer assisted method, the mean cup anteversion precision was 1.5° (1 to 2) and mean cup abduction measured 2.5° (2 to 3.5). Computer assisted cup placement is a very accurate and reproducible technique during THA. It is clearly more precise than either of the two traditional methods of cup positioning, even for well-trained surgeons

Two computer assisted techniques (CT and a fluoro-guide based system) were used to insert the femoral component of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty. The accuracy and variability of component positioning were compared. Clinical data was collected pre-operatively and is being collected post-operatively. Standing AP and lateral knee X-rays as well as skyline X-rays were collected pre-operatively and post-operative full length AP and lateral femur X-rays were completed in order to measure alignment of the femoral component. Results are showing accurate insertions of the Oxford knee femoral component using both systems. To review two computer-assisted techniques for inserting Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasties. CT based and fluro based techniques were compared with regards to accuracy and variability of component positioning. Currently we are able to use either a CT based system or a fluro based system to accurately insert the femoral component of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty. Computer assist techniques are allowing us to perform minimally invasive arthroplasty procedures with great accuracy. Patients were all seen in a pre-admission clinic where pre-operative clinical survey data were collected. All patients had standing AP and lateral knee X-rays as well as skyline X-rays pre-operatively. Post-perative full length AP and lateral femur X-rays were completed in order to measure alignment of the femoral component. Patients are being followed post-operatively with SF-36, WOMAC, Knee Society Scores, and X-rays. Patients being operated on with the CT based system had pre operative CT scans. Intra-operatively a DRB was fixed to the patient’s femur and the chosen computer assisted technique was used to direct the rotation of the tibial cut as well as the alignment of the femoral cutting jig. To date we have completed seventeen computer assisted Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties. The average error in the AP plane using CT based system was 3.2 degrees and 2.1 degrees for the lateral plane. The average error in the AP plane using the fluro-based system was 2.2 degrees and 1.3 degree for the lateral plane. Funding: NSERC, IRIS, ORDCF

Two computer assisted techniques (CT and a fluoro-guide based system) were used to insert the femoral component of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty. The accuracy and variability of component positioning were compared. Clinical data was collected pre-operatively and is being collected post-operatively. Standing AP and lateral knee X-rays as well as skyline X-rays were collected pre-operatively and post-operative full length AP and lateral femur X-rays were completed in order to measure alignment of the femoral component. Results are showing accurate insertions of the Oxford knee femoral component using both systems. To review two computer-assisted techniques for inserting Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasties. CT based and fluro based techniques were compared with regards to accuracy and variability of component positioning. Currently we are able to use either a CT based system or a fluro based system to accurately insert the femoral component of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty. Computer assist techniques are allowing us to perform minimally invasive arthroplasty procedures with great accuracy. Patients were all seen in a pre-admission clinic where pre-operative clinical survey data were collected. All patients had standing AP and lateral knee X-rays as well as skyline X-rays pre-operatively. Post-perative full length AP and lateral femur X-rays were completed in order to measure alignment of the femoral component. Patients are being followed post-operatively with SF-36, WOMAC, Knee Society Scores, and X-rays. Patients being operated on with the CT based system had pre operative CT scans. Intra-operatively a DRB was fixed to the patient’s femur and the chosen computer assisted technique was used to direct the rotation of the tibial cut as well as the alignment of the femoral cutting jig. To date we have completed seventeen computer assisted Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties. The average error in the AP plane using CT based system was 3.2 degrees and 2.1 degrees for the lateral plane. The average error in the AP plane using the fluro-based system was 2.2 degrees and 1.3 degree for the lateral plane. Funding: NSERC, IRIS, ORDCF

Stereotactic principles used primarily for brain surgery have been developed further and introduced into spine surgery at the beginning of the 1990’s. The system solutions available consist of three components: the surgical object (vertebra), the virtual object (CT-image data of the vertebra), and the navigatorallowing the surgeon to localise the position of the instrument inside the surgical object in real-time. Optoelectronic systems using infrared light emitting diodes and magnetic field based navigators are in use. Lumbar pedicle screw insertion was the first clinical application for this technique. Screws can be positioned safely following a preplanned optimal trajectory or according to the anatomic situation utilising the real-time module intraoperatively. The effectiveness of this new technique has been shown in prospective studies (Schwarzenbach et al 1997, Laine et al 1997, 1999). In a a prospective randomised clinical trial one-hundred consecutive patients were randomly allocated for either conventional (Group 1) or computer assisted (Group 2) pedicle screw insertion. From the computer assisted group nine patients were dropped out. There was no statistical difference between the groups. CT-based optoelectronic navigation was used for screw insertion in Group 2. The screw position in the pedicle was assessed postoperatively by an independent observer with CT. The pedicle perforation rate was 13.4% (37/277 screws) in the conventional group and 4.6% (10/219 screws) in the computer assisted group (P=0.006). The majority of perforations was less than 4 mm. A pedicle perforation of 4 to 6 mm was found in 1.4% (4/277) of the screws in Group 1, and none in Group 2. Intraoperatively, eleven screws were repositioned in Group 1 and none in Group 2. There were no postoperative complications related to screw placement. We conclude that higher accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer assisted navigation than with conventional methods could be demonstrated under clinical conditions in a randomised controlled clinical trial. At present CAOS Systems are used also for localisation of intraosseous pathologic processes during biopsies in spine and pelvis, sacroiliac screw fixation and vertebral osteotomies. Refinement of the method for use in minimal invasive and percutaneous procedures is in progress

To describe our experience with computer assisted combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and osteotomy. It may provide long-term symptom relief and improved function in patients with medial knee arthrosis and ACL-deficiency, while delaying or possibly eliminating the need for further surgical intervention such as arthroplasty. Two patients who had medial unicompartmental arthrosis and chronic ACL-deficient knees underwent ACL reconstruction along with femoral osteotomy in one case and upper tibial osteotomy in the other. We used Orthopilot software to perform computer assisted combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and osteotomy. Subjective evaluation at postoperatively indicated significant improvement compared to preoperative evaluation and better scores for patients who obtained normal knee range of motion. Objective evaluation by International Knee Documentation Committee showed improved score postoperatively. Both had minor complications occurred in the immediate postoperative period. The average correction angle of the osteotomy was 7 degrees (7–10). Computer assisted ACL reconstruction and osteotomy may provide long-term symptomatic pain relief, increased activity and improved function. Only Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not effectively provide pain relief to the ACL-deficient knee with degenerative medial arthrosis. The results of this study suggest that combined high tibial or femoral osteotomy and ACL reconstructions are effective in the surgical treatment of varus, ACL-deficient knees with symptomatic medial compartment arthritis. Computer aided surgery allows precise correction of the axial deformity and tunnel orientation intraoperatively

Computer navigation was introduced in Australia in 2000, initially with the use of pre-operative computer scans and then later with image free systems. In 2003 the AOA – NJRR began collecting data for knee replacement performed with computer navigation. Meta analysis of the literature has shown better coronal and sagittal plane alignment in total knee arthroplasty performed with computer navigation as opposed to standard instrumented knee replacement. At present, however, there is no data on improved outcomes or reduced revision rates. Information was requested from the AOA – NJRR on the use of computer navigation for both uni-compartmental and total knee replacements. This included numbers of navigated knees done per year as well as revision rates and reasons for revisions of knees performed by computer navigation surgery. Since data collection began there has been 2,651 computer assisted total knee replacements performed which is 4.1% of the total number of knee replacements in this time period. There has been a steady increase in the last three years in the use of computer navigation. There has been an increased number of computer navigated knees performed in the private hospital sector as opposed to the public hospitals and there is a state by state variation in the uptake of navigation. The revision rate per 100 observed ‘component’ years at three years is 2.8 for non computer assisted and 2.5 computer assisted surgery. This is not statistically significant. There is no difference in the early complication rate leading to revision. The use of computer navigation could be expected to reduce the long term revision rates of knee arthroplasty due to better alignment and potentially less wear. In the short term there is no significant revision rate between the two methods of performing TKR particularly with regard to infection or fracture

Aims: To determine the precision of conventional versus computer assisted techniques for positioning the acetab-ular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Using a lateral approach, 150 cups were placed by 10 different surgeons in 10 identical plastic pelvis models. Only the immediate operating þeld was visible. Preoperative planning was performed with a computerized tomographic scan. Fifty cups were placed free hand, 50 others with the standard cup ancillary, and the remaining 50 cups using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. The accuracy of cup abduction and ante-version was assessed with an electromagnetic system. Results: Using conventional techniques, free hand placement revealed a mean precision of cup anteversion and abduction of 10¡ [range: 5.5–14] and 3.5¡ [2.5–5] respectively. With the cup positioner, these angles measured 8¡ [5–10.5] and 4¡ [3–5.5] respectively, and using the computer assisted method, the mean cup anteversion precision was 1.5¡ [1–2] and mean cup abduction measured 2.5¡ [2–3.5]. Conclusions: Computer assisted cup placement is a very accurate and reproducible technique during THA. It is clearly more precise than either of the two traditional methods of cup positioning, even for well-trained surgeons

Minimally invasive total hip replacement surgery not only decreases the number of visual cues necessary for proper acetabular component position, the small incision makes it technically more difficult to use traditional mechanical alignment guides. Furthermore, traditional mechanical guides have been shown to be unable to accurately predict component position as determined by intraoperative computer measurements.[ 1,2 ] Computer assisted intraoperative navigation can enable minimally invasive surgery by giving the surgeon immediate intra-operative feedback of actual component position. We wished to compare the intraoperative computer determined measurement of acetabular inclination with the postoperative radiographic measurement of inclination in order to validate the results of the computer assisted measurements in the clinical setting. To determine whether computer assisted navigation of the acetabular component allows the surgeon to accurately place the prosthesis in minimally invasive hip replacement and to compare the results of intraoperative navigation with the postoperative radiograph. 42 consecutive patients underwent a minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty with the assistance of CT based intraoperative navigation with the BrainLAB VectorVision software. Preoperative surgical planning was performed after acquisition of a CT scan. All components were templated to be placed in 45 degrees of inclination and 25 degrees of anteversion. Intraoperatively, cementless acetabular components were aligned with the computer navigation at these values prior to implant impaction. Because of the press fit nature and limited soft tissue exposure, many components would shift during impaction. Final component position was then verified and values recorded by detecting points on the acetabular surface. If the prosthesis was felt to be in an acceptable position, no attempt was made to modify component position to the predetermined values in order to avoid potentially compromising component fixation. Postoperative supine AP pelvis radiography was then used to determine final inclination. Measurements were made by drawing a line perpendicular to the acetabular teardrop and parallel to the acetabular component and measured with a standard goniometer. These data were then placed in an SPSS database and analyzed by an independent statistician. Assessing acetabular component position in routine total hip arthroplasty has been shown to be unreliable even with experienced surgeons with mechanical alignment guides. [1,3] In minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty, routine visual cues are limited and mechanical instruments are difficult to place in the small operative wounds making an already difficult task even more difficult. CT based image guided surgery can has been shown to improve the acetabular component position intraoperatively 2. However, postoperative validation studies comparing the intraoperative computer assessment with the postoperative radiographic measurement are scarce. [ 2 ] In this consecutive series, which represents the author’s first experience with this technology, several conclusions can be made. First, the act of impacting a solid, porous coated, hemispherical cementless acetabular component in minimally invasive hip surgery often leads to a final component position different from the intended position. Second, computer generated determination of implant position is reliable but care must be taken to make sure the reference arrays do not lose fixation during the procedure or spurious results can occur. Third, routine AP pelvis radiographic measurements are not accurate enough to determine whether the computer determined values are accurate. In spite of these measurement inaccuracies, the computer determined results and the radiographic results were within 10 degress 95 % of the time which is far more accurate than results obtained with mechanical alignment tools 3. Finally, further validation studies need to be done with postoperative CT scanning to determine the accuracy of the intraoperative computerized measurements and determine the measurement errors inherent in the clinical setting. Given these limitations, computer assisted navigation improves the accuracy and reliability of acetabular component position over traditional mechanical instruments and can be utilized in minimally invasive hip surgery to assist in the appropriate placement of the acetabular prosthesis

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods for the quantification of bone marrow edema (BME) of the knee. Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients with Bone Marrow Edema (BME) of the knee due to osteonecrosis, osteoarthritis, bone bruise or stress were included in the study. Coronal STIR images of the affected knees were obtained using either a 1.0 Tesla or a 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance (MR) scanner. To monitor the BME’s progression, every knee was examined twice at a 3-month interval. Size and signal intensity of BME were semi-quantitatively assessed in consensus by two radiologists and two orthopaedic surgeons. Independently, size and signal intensity were calculated using a new computer assisted method based on grey value analysis and calculation of a threshold value between normal and edematous bone marrow. The results of the semi-quantitative method were correlated with those of the computer assisted method. Results: The correlation coefficient was 0.89 (ìstrongî) for BME size and 0.72 (ìmedium to strongî) for BME signal intensity. For the progression of size and signal intensity, correlation coefficients of 0.78 (ìstrongî) and 0.67 (ìmediumî) were found. Conclusion: Good correlation between semi-quantitative and quantitative methods of assessment of both size and intensity of BME was found. While the computer assisted method is time-consuming and reserved for scientific purposes, the semi-quantitative method is simple and offers to the experienced examiner a fast and simple means for BME recording in clinical practice

Purpose: Use of six-axis analysis and computer assisted deformity correction via a circular external fixator is a new method for deformity correction. We investigated its accuracy and safety in reconstruction of femoral deformity in children and young adults. Method: We retrospectively reviewed all cases including the indications for use and the methodology of application of the computer assisted six-axis analysis and circular external fixator for reconstruction of 22 femora in 20 patients. Twelve patients were female, and 8 were male. The average age was 13.9 (range, 5.9–24.6). Etiology included traumatic (7), idiopathic (6), multiple enchondromatosis (2), rickets (2), congenital femoral deficiency (2), spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia (1), congenital pseudohypoparathyroidisim (1), and multifocal osteomyelitis (1). Clinical and radiographic data were analyzed. Results: Average follow-up was 14.4 months (range, 4.5–32). Average time in frame was 6.2 months (range, 2.6–19). Bone lengthening of 3.9 cm (range, 1–8.5) was performed in 12 femora. In genu valgum patients, the mLDFA improved from a mean of 73.7° to a mean of 89°. In genu varum patients, the mLDFA improved from a mean of 99.8° to a mean of 89.5°. Complications included pin tract infection in 6, knee stiffness in 3, delayed union in 2, skin irritation in 1, posterior knee subluxation in 2, both of which had stable knees preoperatively. One patient was lost to follow-up and returned back with deformity. No complications occurred in 8 patients. Conclusion: Computer assisted femoral deformity correction with six-axis analysis and application of circular external fixator is a useful technique with the advantage of managing multiplanar deformities in children and young adults. It has the potential complications of the use of any external fixator. Close follow-up is necessary to avoid subluxation of the knee joint even in patients with stable knees. Accurate and safe correction can be achieved in almost all patients

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the new technique of computer assisted knee arthroplasty (CAK) against the conventional jig based technique (JBK). Methods Seventy-five consecutive patients underwent knee replacement and were randomly allocated to either the CAK or JBK group. Post-operative CT scans were performed according to the Perth CT Knee Arthroplasty protocol to assess the accuracy of alignment. This measures seven parameters of alignment to an accuracy of one degree. Pre and post-operative Maquet views of the limb were also performed. Intra-operative soft tissue release together with post-operative pain scores and blood loss where also assessed. Results CT scans performed show a statistically significant improvement in component alignment when using computer assisted surgery for femoral varus/valgus (p=0.032),femoral rotation (p=0.001),tibial varus/valgus (p=0.047) tibial posterior slope (p=0.0001), tibial rotation (p=0.011) and femoraltibial mismatch (p=0.037). Standing Maquet limb alignment was also improved (p=0.004) as was blood loss (p=0.0001). CAK surgery took longer, a mean increase of 13 minutes (p=0.0001). Conclusions This is the first controlled study to assess all seven alignment characteristics of knee arthroplasty and use them to compare outcomes in conventional and computer assisted operations. It shows a clear improvement in component alignment with computer navigation. In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source

The aim of the study was to determine the precision of conventional versus computer-assisted techniques for positioning the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malposition of the acetabular component during THA increases the occurrence of impingement, reduces range of motion, and increases the risk of dislocation and long-term wear. To prevent malpositioned hip implants, an increasing number of computer assisted surgery systems have been described, but their accuracy is not well established. Using a lateral approach, 150 cups were placed by 10 different surgeons in 10 identical plastic pelvis models. Only the immediate operating field was visible. Pre-operative planning was performed with a computerised tomography scan. Fifty cups were placed free hand, 50 others with the standard cup positioner, and the remaining 50 cups using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (Medivision). The accuracy of cup abduction and anteversion was assessed with an electromagnetic system (Fastrak™). Using conventional techniques, free hand placement revealed a mean precision of cup anteversion and abduction of 10° [range 5.5 to 14] and 3.5° [2.5 to 5] respectively. With the cup positioner, these angles measured 8° [5 to 10.5] and 4° [3 to 5.5] respectively, and using the computer assisted method, the mean cup anteversion precision was 1.5° [1 to 2] and mean cup abduction measured 2.5° [2 to 3.5]. Computer assisted cup placement is a very accurate and reproducible technique during THA. It is clearly more precise than either of the two traditional methods of cup positioning, even for well-trained surgeons

The most reported benefit of TKA navigation technologies has been the reduction in limb and component alignment outliers. This improvement has not been shown to effect clinical outcomes. This study was designed to compare the functional outcomes between computer assisted techniques and manual techniques. Each group had 60 patients with similar demographics. The average functional outcomes (SF-36, WOMAC, range of motion, pain relief, and knee society score) were the same. The average scores of the SF-36, Knee Society Score, WOMAC were similar for the two groups. However, fewer patients in Group II reported visual analog pain scores greater than 40 at 6 wks, 3 mos and 6 mos. At 1 yr, the pain scores of the two groups were similar. Fewer patients in Group II had KSS scores less than 70 at 3 months, 80 at 6 months, and 90 at one year, than those in Group I. The average range of motion in Group II was greater by 8 degrees at 4 wks and 3 mos, but equal to the average ROM in Group I at 6 and 12 mos. However, the number of patients with less than 90 degrees of motion at each follow-up period was less in Group II than in Group I at each follow-up period. There were fewer superficial wound infections in Group II than in Group I. The average functional outcomes were similar; the results indicate a consistent reduction in outliers in most measured parameters of functional outcomes. In particular, the guidelines for administering pain medication and providing physical therapy were similar for the two groups. The results of this study are parallel to the radiographic results comparing TKA’s performed with manual and computer assisted instrumentation. In those studies, a reduction in outliers was consistently associated with the use of computer assisted techniques

Unicompartment knee arthroplasty (UKA) was proven to be one of the standard treatments of medial compartment osteoarthritis. The key to success was restoration of pre-operative alignment. Overcorrection of coronal (AP) alignment may predispose to early osteoarthritis in the contralateral compartment, change in post-operative tibial slope may predispose to proximal tibial bone collapse and loosening of tibial prosthesis. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in UKA was developed quickly in the last ten years. However, MIS has limited access to visualize the surgical field and limb alignment. Computer navigation may help the surgeon to place the component in more accurate position. We aim to study the radiological alignment of computer assisted MIS UKA. Eighteen patients with UKA (PreservationTM, all poly tibia, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Warsaw, IN) implanted using MIS technique were studied prospectively. The CiTM system (DePuy International Ltd, Warsaw IN) were used for computer navigation. Five male and 13 female patients were studied. The mean age of the patients was 58.2 (range, 45 to 70). All patients had medial compartment osteoarthritis with varus deformity. The postoperative coronal (AP) alignment and tibial slope of the operated limb were compared with the pre-operative alignment for any significant difference. The mean pre-operative and post-operative radiographic coronal (AP) alignment of the operated limb were 8.4° varus (range, 2° to 12°) and 7.2° varus (range, 1° to 15°) respectively, the difference was not significant (p = 0.537). The mean pre-operative and post-operative tibial slope were 6.8° (range, 3° to 11°) and 5.8° (range, 3° to 10°) respectively, the difference was not significant (p = 0.066). The post-operative tibial slope correlated well with the intra-operative tibial slope recorded by computer after bone cut was made (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.771). The mean tourniquet time was 124 minutes (range, 94 to 140 minutes). There was no significant difference in pre-operative and post-operative coronal alignment of the operated limb. Computer assisted MIS UKA could reproduce the pre-operative coronal alignment and tibial slope. Restoration of the pre-operative limb alignment in coronal plane and tibial slope was crucial to the survival of UKA. Computer navigation could help the surgeon to position the component during minimally invasive surgery. However, the learning curve of computer assisted MIS UKA was steep

Computer assisted navigation (CAN) has been shown to significantly improve the overall alignment obtained after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Human error and the use of conventional jigs may be the reasons for the inaccuracy of conventional TKA. The impact of computer assisted equipment in surgeon training has not yet been established. Three orthopaedic trainees participated in this prospective study to assess the impact of CAN upon intraoperative alignment. Each trainee’s first five (early group) and last five (late group) TKA’s were included in the study during their three month training period. A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The accuracy of conventional jig positioning was assessed simultaneously using navigation equipment. After this assessment, the actual bony resection was performed using CAN equipment. There was a consistent trend towards improved accuracy between the early and late groups in the majority of parameters assessed. In the early group, the coronal plane tibial alignment was found to be outside the acceptable three degree range in 11 out of 15. In the late group this improved to two out of 15 (p< 0.05). An average of 2.8 degrees of tibial jig deviation during pinning was noted in the early group which improved to one degree in late group. The accuracy of jig placement in both groups was improved by CAN. Computer assisted navigation is helpful in improving the accuracy of trainee surgeons and should prove a useful adjunct in training. Surgical accuracy using conventional jig based systems can be improved with training. Deviation of conventional tibial alignment jig during pinning is a significant factor. This aspect has not been appreciated fully in the past and can be minimised by the use of the navigation equipment. As shown in previous studies, the overall alignment using CAN is superior to what would have been obtained using conventional jigs for TKA

Aims: Computer guidance has improved the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CT-based computer assisted pedicle screw insertion enhances the clinical results of lumbar fusion. Methods: 100 lumbo- and thora-columbosacral operations were randomized either into i) conventional pedicle screw insertion (Group 1) or into ii) computer assisted technique using the SurgiGATE Spine 2.1 optoelectronic navigation system (Group 2). Clinical results were analyzed using the Oswestry index. Radiological analysis was performed by an independent radiologist. Results: 95 patients completed the follow-up. Three had died and two were lost. Thus, there were 48 patients (265 screws) in Group 1, 38 patients (201 screws) in Group 2, and 9 dropouts from the original randomization. There was no statistical difference between the groups regarding age, gender, diagnosis, type of operation, operating time or number of screws per patient. The follow-up time was 24.2 ± 1.6 months. The preoperative Oswestry score in Group 1 was 47.7 ± 16.6, and in Group 2 51.4 ± 16.3 (NS). The postoperative scores were, respectively, 27.1 ± 19.1 and 30.8 ± 22.7 (NS). The fusion rate in Group 1 was 85.1%, and in Group 2 92.1% (NS). In Group 1 4.5% of the screws were loose or broken as compared to 7.0% in Group 2 (NS). Conclusions: Despite superior accuracy, at 2-year follow-up no clinical benefit from computer assisted pedicle screw insertion could be demonstrated in this randomized controlled clinical study

Introduction: Computer navigated total knee replacement does not require the use of intramedullary alignment rods, and is thus less invasive than traditional methods. One previous study has suggested that the computer-assisted technique may reduce blood loss in comparison to traditional methods. This study (. Kalairajah et al, 2005. ) used blood volume loss from drainage bottles as a primary outcome measure (n=60). Hidden (internal) blood losses were not accounted for. Our study uses a more accurate method of assessing blood loss, and the sample size is larger (n=136; 68 standard TKR versus 68 computer assisted TKR). Methods: 136 TKR patients were included, of which 68 had standard TKR and 68 computer assisted. Patients were matched such that in each group half had BMI in the range 20–30, and half had BMI between 30–40. Patients were also matched for gender. All patients had Tranexamic acid at the start of the procedure. Total body blood volume was calculated using the formula of . Nadler, Hidalgo & Bloch (1962). This was then used, together with haematocrit and volume re-infused or transfused, to calculate true blood loss, as described by . Sehat, Evans, and Newman (2004). This method is considered to be more reliable than measuring drain output, as it takes account of “hidden” losses. The navigated and non-navigated groups were compared using Student’s t-test. Results: The average blood loss was 583ml in the standard TKR group, and 442ml in the computer assisted TKR group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.003). Conclusions: A previous study found reduced blood loss when performing total knee replacement using computer navigation, compared with traditional methods. Our study confirmed this finding, using a larger sample size, and a more reliable method of assessing blood loss. Our study found that overall blood loss was less for both groups, when compared to the findings of Kalairajah Y et al. We suspect that this difference was due to our departmental policy that all patients receive tranexamic acid at the start of joint replacement procedure

Studies suggest that specialty hospitals and high surgical volume decrease adverse outcomes related to hip arthroplasty. Little is known, however, concerning the influence of imageless computer navigation systems on a surgeon’s experience and subsequent placement of implants in the setting of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A retrospective review of 71 consecutive hip resurfacing arthroplasties placed with computer assisted navigation during 2006 and 2007 was performed. Forty-seven operative days encompassing the surgeon’s entire experience with hip resurfacing were analysed. Within this single surgeon series, operative time, intraoperative cup inclination and femoral stem/shaft angles, as well as postoperative cup inclination and femoral stem/shaft angles were measured and compared over three discreet, sequential operative time intervals. Intraoperative cup inclination angles were comparable to postoperative radiographic values as there was no significant difference (p=.059). Computer assisted navigation produced consistent values despite different levels of surgeon experience in the setting of intraoperative cup inclination (42.8°, 43.5°, and 40.1°) and postoperative cup (46.1°, 43.9°, and 42.9°) and femoral stem (147.9°, 146.5°, and 144.0°) radiographic alignment. A statistically significant difference existed between intraoperative femoral stem/shaft angles compared to postoperative radiographs measurements (p< .001), however, all means maintained a valgus orientation compared to the native neck angle. There was a correlation between evolving surgeon experience and intraoperative stem placement (143.5°, 142.1°, and 138.0°, respectively) despite the mean values remaining well clustered (p< .001). Operative times significantly decreased (p< .001) with surgeon experience, showing the largest decrease after the 1. st. sequence interval (109.6, 97.8, and 94.8 min, respectively). No femoral notching (0/71) occurred throughout the series. Computer assisted navigation provides a dependable method of accurate hip resurfacing arthroplasty component positioning as measured by cup inclination, in addition to a reliable technique for valgus stem placement and avoidance of notching. Furthermore, computer navigation allows for consistency and offers a protective effect on component alignment independent of surgeon procedural experience

INTRODUCTION. Despite clear clinical advantages Unicompartimetal Knee Replacement (UKR) still remain a high demanding and less forgiving surgical procedure. Different Authors in literature pointed out how in coronal tibial malalignment beyond 3° as well as tibial slope beyond 7° increase the rate of aseptic failure. Likewise, overcorrection in the coronal plain is a well recognised cause of failure because of an overweighting on the controlateral compartment. Furthermore it has been shown how in UKR surgery even using short narrow intramedullary guide this can cause errors in both coronal planes. Computer assisted surgery has been proposed to improve implant positioning in joint replacement surgery with no need of intramedullary guide. Likewise more recently Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested as a new technology capable of new advantages such as shorter surgical times and lower blood losses maintaining at least the same accuracy. Aim of this prospective study is to present comparing 2 groups of UKRs using either a computer assisted technique or a CT based PSI. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Since January 2010 54 patients undergoing UKR because of medial compartment arthritis were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before surgery patients were alternatively assigned to either computer-assisted alignment (group A) or PSI group (group B). In the group A (27 knees) the implant (Sigma, Depuy Orthopaedics Inc, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) was positioned using a CT-free computer assisted alignment system specifically created for UKR surgery (OrthoKey, Delaware, USA USA). In group B (27knees) the implant (GMK uni, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) was performed using a CT-Based PSI technology (MyKnee, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). In both the groups all the implants were cemented and using always a fixed metal backed tibial component. The duration of surgery and all the complications according to Kim classification were documented in all cases. Six months after surgery each patient had long-leg standing anterior-posterior radiographs and lateral radiographs of the knee. The radiographs were assessed to determine the Frontal Femoral Component angle (FFC), the Frontal Tibial Component angle (FTC), the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) and the sagittal orientation (slope) of both tibial and femoral component. The number and percentage of outliners for each parameter was determined. In addition the percentage of patients from each group with all 5 parameters within the desired range was calculated. Furthermore at the latest follow-up the 2 groups were clinically assessed using KSS and Functional score. RESULTS. At the last assessments there were no differences in the clinical outcome. The mean surgical time was longer in the navigated group of a mean of 5.9 minutes without any statistical differences in complications. The mechanical axis, tibial slope the FTC angle were significantly better aligned in the navigated group. A statistically significant higher number of outliners was seen in the PSI group. The number of implants with all 5 radiological parameters aligned within the desired range was statistically higher in the navigated group. All the implants in the navigated group were correctly aligned in all the planned parameters. DISCUSSION. To our knowledge this is the first prospective study in literature assessing navigation compared to PSI technique in UKR surgery. Despite a slight not significant longer surgical time in the navigated group, at a short follow-up the results could not demonstrate any clinical diffences between the 2 technologies However according to their results the Authors indicate navigation as more helpful in UKR surgery compared to PSI technology in terms of accuracy

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty has become an increasingly common procedure. Improper cup position contributes to bearing surface wear, pelvic osteolysis, dislocations, and revision surgery. The incidence of cup malposition outside of the safe zone (40° ± 10° abduction and 15° ± 10° anteversion) using traditional techniques has been reported to be as high as 50%. Our hypothesis is that computer assisted navigation will improve cup placement in total hip arthroplasty compared with traditional techniques. Methods. This study retrospectively evaluated the position of 425 consecutive cups placed during primary total hip arthroplasty performed over a two-year period, from 8/1/2012 to 8/1/2014. All cups were placed with a direct-anterior muscle-sparing approach with computer-assisted imageless navigation by a single surgeon. Real-time intraoperative “screen shots” were taken of cup placement. Standard antero-posterior postoperative radiographs of the pelvis were taken within 6 weeks of surgery in the operating surgeon's office using the same standardized protocol for each patient. The radiographs were evaluated by two separate investigators for final abduction and anteversion utilizing the same method as other studies. Statistics were descriptive in nature. Results. Intraoperative navigation screenshots from 425 hips showed that 100% were within the safe zone for abduction and anteversion. Postoperative radiographic review showed that 97% were within the safe zone for abduction (Mean 41 degrees, Range 29–54 degrees), 96% were within the safe zone for anteversion (Mean 16 degrees, Range 4–38 degrees) and 94% were within the safe zone for both abduction and anteversion. Conclusion. In our series, computer assisted navigation improved cup placement in total hip arthroplasty compared with traditional techniques as reported in current literature. Cup position in our study, was within the safe zone for abduction and version at a comparable rate to similar studies examining THA's performed with navigation

INTRODUCTION. Nowadays, longevity of total knee arthroplasties is very acceptable. Survivorship analyses demonstrate a success in a range of 80% to more than 95% over a period of more than ten years (1–4). However, long-term results largely depend, amongst other factors, on restoration of physiological alignment of the lower limb (5–11). Jeffery et al. (12) reported a three percent loosening rate over eight years when knees were correctly aligned whereas insufficient alignment lead to prosthetic loosening in 24 percent. Rand and Coventry (13) found a 90 percent survivorship rate at ten years when the mechanical axis was aligned in a range from nought to four degrees of valgus. Valgus position of more than four degrees or varus alignment resulted in only 71 percent and 73 percent of survivorship respectively. Recently, computer aided instrumentation systems (14,15) became available and preliminary results of small series were reported (16–17). The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computer integrated instrumentation for knee alignment. MATERIAL AND METHOD. The OrthoPilot. ®. represents a computer controlled image supported alignment system. A 3-D Optotrak™ camera localizes infra-red diodes fixed to rigid bodies within the surgical field. Thereby a spatial coordinate reference system is provided. The localizer is linked to a UNIX work station which performs the operative protocol using a graphical interface and a foot pedal. The rigid bodies are fixed to the bones by bicortical screws. An intraoperative kinematic analysis and various additional landmarks lead to definition of the centres of hip, ankle and knee joint and sizing of endoprosthetic components. With the use of LED-equipped alignment instruments the femoral and tibial resection planes are determined. The OrthoPilot. ®. navigation system is not dependant on CT data and no additional preoperative planning is therefore necessary. A prospective comparative multicentre study in five institutions, four in Germany and one in France, was carried out. 821 patients with primary tricompartimental knee arthroplasty using the SEARCH LC knee (B|Braun AESCULAP) were included in the study. The OrthoPilot. ®. Navigation system was used in 555 cases and 266 knees were implanted with the use of conventional instrumentation. At the three months follow-up alignment was assessed using standardized one leg stance radiographs with regard to the mechanical axis and the femoral and tibial angels in the coronal plane. For the lateral femoral and tibial angels standard lateral x-rays were used. Prosthetic alignment was verified by an independent observer. RESULTS. The radiographically assessed results were subdivided into three groups. An error of ± one degree in the radiographical measurements and small deviations caused by the play of surgical instruments have to be considered. With respect to the femoral and tibial angels in the ap and lateral view the group of very good clinical results was, therefore, defined in the range between ninty degrees and ± two degrees. Deviations of three and four degrees from the optimum were classified as being clinically acceptable. Aberrations of more than four degrees were classified as outliers. When measuring the mechanical axis deviations from fully precise femoral and tibial angels may add up. For this reason zero degrees ± three degrees were rated as a very good result, deviations of four to five degrees were considered to be acceptable and alignment beyond five degrees from the optimum was classified as an unsatisfactory result. Mechanical axis:. 35. 2% of the navigated cases were aligned at exactly zero degrees. This was achieved in only 24. 4% of the manual cases. 88. 6% of cases using navigation and 72. 2% in the manual group showed zero degrees and varus or valgus angles of up to three degrees. 8. 9% and 18. 1% of cases respectively showed deviations of four or five degrees of valgus or varus alignment representing an acceptable clinical result. In only 2. 5% of the navigation group aberrations of more than five degrees occurred. The rate of dissatisfying results was 9. 8% in the manual group. Femoral axis (coronal plane):. In the navigation group 48. 1% of cases showed an alignment at exactly 90 degrees which was the case in only 33. 5% of the control group. Altogether, in 89. 4% of the navigated cases a very good result was observed. In the conventionally instrumented cases only 77. 1% very good results were found. There were 1. 6% outliers beyond the limits of four degrees in the navigation group in comparison to 4. 9% amongst the control cases. Femoral axis (sagittal plane):. Very good results with up to two degrees of deviation from a ninety degree position were obtained in 75. 5% of navigated cases and 70. 7% of manual cases. 37. 3% and 34. 6% respectively showed an ideal alignment of exactly ninety degrees. Unsatisfactory results were observed in 9. 5% of the navigated cases and 9. 4% of the manual cases. Tibial axis (coronal plane):. 58. 7% of the computer assisted and 40. 6% of the reference cases were exactly aligned at rectangles. All in all, in 91. 9% navigated and only 83. 5% manual cases a very good result was obtained. Only 1. 1% outliers had to be observed in the navigation group whereas 3. 4% unsatisfactory results were registered with manual technique. Tibial axis (sagittal plane):. 44. 3% of the navigated cases and only 26. 7% of cases in the control group were aligned perpendicular to the dorsal tibial cortex, thus showing no posterior slope. Altogether, 81. 3% could be classified as very good clinical results in the computer assisted group. The corresponding rate of the manual group was 69. 9%. Equivalent values of 8. 6% in the navigation group and 8. 3% in the reference group were registered beyond the limits of four degrees deviation. The additional operation time for the use of the navigation system is calculated between eight and ten minutes after having passed through the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS. Knee navigation facilitates proper alignment of endoprosthetic components and with the use of the Ortho-Pilot. ®. system results are clearly more favourable in comparison to conventional instrumentation technique. In addition, the data obtained from literature demonstrate that the use of this navigation system contributes to reducing outliers in number. With the learning curve the OrthoPilot. ®. alignment system proved to gain in reliability. Deviations from perfect alignment are still difficult to be classified into surgical or technical deficiencies. Many technical and software improvements which were introduced in the meantime will, in addition, contribute to reliability and time saving. Comparative studies with different navigation systems are not yet available. They might allow an even more profound insight into the possibilities and advantages or disadvantages of computer assisted knee alignment. LITERATURE. (1) Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L. Survival of knee arthroplasties, a nation-wide multicenter investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986; 68B: 795-803 . (2) Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Windsor RE, Moran MC. Survivorship of cemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989; 798-409 . (3) Nafei A, Kristensen O, Knudson HM, Hvid I, Jensen J. Survivorship analysis of cemented total condylar knee arthoplasty. J Arthoplasty 11, 1996;07-10 . (4) Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S, Hansraj KH, Maynhard MJ. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-years survivorship study. Clin Orthop 1993; 286:94-102 . (5) Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1977;59-A:77-79 . (6) Hood RW, Vanni M, Insall JN. The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop 1981;160:94-105 . (7) Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MAR. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1983;173:178-183. . (8) Hvid I, Nielsen S. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:160-165 . (9) Tew M, Waugh W. Tibial-femoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1985;67-B:551-556 . (10) Jonsson B, Astrom J. Alignment and long-term clinical results of a semi-constrained knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1988;226:124-128 . (11) Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994;299:153-156 . (12) Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1991;73-B:709-714 . (13) Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. 1988;232:168-173 . (14) Leitner F, Picard F, Minfelde R, Schulz HJ, Clinquin P, Saragaglia D. Computer assisted knee surgical total replacement. In: CVRMed-MRCAS. Troccaz J, Grimson E, Mösges R (Eds). 1997; 630-638, Springer . (15) Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies BL, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1998; 354:49-56 . (16) Picard F, Saragaglia D, Montbarbon E, Chaussard C, Leitner F, Raoult O. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty - preliminary clinical results with the Ortho-Pilot System. Abstract, 4th International CAOS Symposium, Davos, Switzerland, 1999 . (17) Miehlke RK, Clemens U, Jens J-H, Kershally S. Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik - vorläufige klinische Erfahrungen und prospektiv vergleichende Studie gegenüber konventioneller Implantationstechnik, Z Orthop 2001; 139: 109-116

Restoring the overall mechanical alignment to neutral has been the gold standard since the 1970s and remains the current standard of knee arthroplasty today. Recently, there has been renewed interest in alternative alignment goals that place implants in a more “physiologic” position with the hope of improving clinical outcomes. Anywhere from 10 – 20% of patients are dissatisfied after knee replacement surgery and while the cause is multifactorial, some believe that it is related to changing native alignment and an oblique joint line (the concept of constitutional varus) to a single target of mechanical neutral alignment. In addition, recent studies have challenged the long held belief that total knee placed outside the classic “safe zone” of +/− 3 degrees increases the risk of mechanical failure which theoretically supports investigating alternative, more patient specific, alignment targets. From a biomechanical, implant retrieval, and clinical outcomes perspective, mechanical alignment should remain the gold standard for TKA. Varus tibias regardless of overall alignment pattern show increased polyethylene wear and varus loading increases the risk of posteromedial collapse. While recently questioned, the evidence states that alignment does matter. When you combine contemporary knee designs placed in varus with an overweight population (which is the majority of TKA patients) the failure rate increases exponentially when compared to neutral alignment. A recent meta-analysis on mechanical alignment and survivorship clearly demonstrated reduced survivorship for varus-aligned total knees. The only way to justify the biomechanical risks associated with placing components in an alternative alignment target is a significant clinical outcome benefit but the evidence is lacking. A randomised control trial comparing mechanical alignment (MA) and kinematic alignment (KA) found a significant improvement in clinical outcomes and knee function in KA patients at 2 year follow-up. In contrast, Young et al. recently published a randomised control trial comparing PSI KA and computer assisted mechanical TKA and found no difference in any clinical outcome measure. Why were the clinical outcomes scores in the MA patients so different: One potential explanation is that different surgical techniques were used. In the Dosset study, the femur was cut at 5 degrees valgus in all patients and femoral component rotation was always set at 3 degrees externally rotated to the posterior condylar axis. We know from several studies that this method leads to inaccuracies in both coronal plane and axial plane in some patients. Young et al. used computer assisted navigation to align his distal femur cut with the mechanical axis and adjusted femoral component rotation to the transepicondylar axis. The results suggest that a well performed mechanical aligned total knee replacement has excellent clinical performance equal to that of kinematic alignment without any of the long term risks of implant failure. Most contemporary TKA implants are designed to be loaded perpendicular to the polyethylene surface and placing them in shear without extensive biomechanical testing to support this alignment target may put patients at long term risk for an unproven benefit. Have we not learned our lesson?

INTRODUCTION. Total knee replacement is mostly done with alignment rods in order to achieve a proper Varus / Valgus alignement. Other techniques are computer assisted navigation or MRI based preoperative planning. iASSIST™ is a computer assisted stereotaxic surgical instrument system to assist the surgeon in the positioning of the orthopaedic implant system components intra-operatively. It is imageless and the communication between the PC and the “Pod's” does not require any direct camera view, it is a bluethooth comunication system. This study presents preliminary results utilizing iASSIST™. The aim of this study was to test and compare radiographic alignment, functional outcomes, and perioperative morbidity of the iASSIST™ Knee system versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. METHODS. In a prospective randomized trial we investigated 60 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Each surgical procedure was conducted by highly experienced surgeons. In both groups the implant Legacy LPS-Flex Fixed Bearing Knee was used (Zimmer®, Warsaw, Indiana). The groups were equally divided and randomized by hazard. For clinical evaluation, the Short Form-36 and Knee Society Score were obtained. For the radiological assessment mediCAD® Classic, a digital measurement system, was used. The aim of the study was the comparison of results after 3 months. Results. 2 patients refused any further participation, and 5 cases required a switch to a conventional alignement technique intraoperatively due to technical problems. Average BMI and average age did not differ in both groups. Surgical time in the iASSIST™ group amounted to 100 minutes, in the conventional group to 76 min. Postoperative functional outcomes were statistically insignificant, showing slight improvements of the Combined Knee Society Score, Knee Society Knee Score, and Knee Society Function Score favouring the iASSIST method, and slight improvements of knee flexion. Short Form-36 physical scales slightly favoured the conventional method but not significantly. The mean deviation from neutral mechanical axis was 1.68°±1.9° within the iASSIST group, and 2.73°±2.1° within the conventional TKA group. Conclusion. IASSIST™ is a valuable computer navigation system. The 5 technical troubles were due to the learning curve. The clinical results after 3 months did not differ significantly, the radiological assessment showed a tendency of improved alignement in the iASSIST™ group

Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) is an emerging and expanding filed. There are some old classification systems that are too comprehensive to cover all new CAOS tools and hybrid devises that are currently present and others that are expected to appear in the near future. Based on our experience and on the literature review, we grouped CAOS devises on the basis of their functionality and clinical use into 6 categories, which are then sub-grouped on technical basis. In future, new devices can be added under new categories or subcategories. This grouping scheme is meant to provide a simple guide on orthopaedic systems rather than a comprehensive classification for all computer assisted systems in surgical practice. For example, the number and diversity of tasks of surgical robots is enormous, up to 159 surgical robots with different mechanisms and functions reported in the literature. These can be classified according to their tasks, mechanism of actions, degree of freedom and level of activity but for the purpose of simplicity we subcategorised the orthopaedic robots to only industrial, hand-held and bone-mounted. Table 1 shows the classification system with the 6 categories and other subcategories

Introduction. Recently, tibial insert design of cruciate-substituting (CS) polyethylene insert is employed and widely used. However, in vivo kinematics of using CS polyethylene insert is still unclear. In this study, it is hypothesized that CS polyethylene insert leads to stability of femoro-tibial joint as well as posterior-stabilized (PS) polyethylene insert, even if PCL is sacrificed after TKA. The purpose of this study is an investigation of in vivo kinematics of femoro-tibial joint with use of CS polyethylene insert before and after PCL resction using computer assisted navigation system and tensor device intra-operatively in TKA. Materials and Methods. Sixty-one consecutive patients who had knees of osteoarthritis with varus deformity were investigated in this study. All TKAs (Triathlon, Stryker) were performed using computer assisted navigation system. During surgery, using a tensor device, after bony cut of femur and tibia, joint gaps were assessed in 0 and 90 degrees in flexion. Then, CS polyethylene tibial trial insert were inserted after trial implantation of femoral and tibial components, before and after resection of PCL, respectively. The kinematic parameters of the soft-tissue balance, and amount of coronal and sagittal relative movement between femur and tibia were obtained by interpreting kinematics, which display tables throughout the range of motion (ROM) in the navigation system. In each ROM (30, 45, 60, 90, max degrees), the data were analyzed with a ANOVA test, and mean values were compared by the multiple comparison test (Turkey HSD test) (p< 0.05). Results. Joint gap assessment revealed significant enlargement in both of extension and 90 degrees in flexion after PCL resection compared with before resection. In kinematic analyses in navigation system, regarding to amount of sagittal movement of tibia, there were significances between before and after PCL resection in 60 and 90 degrees in flexion, 1.2mm difference in 60 degrees, and 2.3mm difference in 90 degrees in flexion. There were no significance between before and after PCL resection in the other degrees in flexion. Regarding to the other analyses, varus/ valgus and rotation, there were no differences between before and after resection of PCL. In addition, concerning ROM, maximum extension angle is significantly lower, and maximum flexion angle is significantly higher after than before PCL resection. Discussion. These results demonstrated that CS polyethylene insert might have a stability of femoro-tibial joint nearly after PCL resection as well as before PCL resection. The main design feature of Triathlon CS insert is single radius and rotary arc, in addition, the posterior lip is same as that of Triathlon CR, which can be the factor to avoid paradoxical anterior movement and to permit internal and external rotation between femoral and tibial component. Due to the design features and benefits, there is a high possibility that use of CS insert without PCL can lead same stability as PCL remained, and improvement of ROM. Based on these backgrounds, it is suggested that CS insert may have an additional choice of PCL resection in case of tight gap of flexion in TKA

Introduction. Computer assisted total knee replacement (CATKR) has been shown to give reproducible and accurate alignment of the mechanical axis. The benefits of the reproducible technique has been demonstrated in literature but there is little evidence of benefits in training junior surgeons in a clinical setting. We show our experience of CATKR performed by junior staff under supervision by the senior author, looking at component alignment and patient reported outcome measures. Objectives. Assess radiological and clinical outcomes of Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacements performed by trainees. Methods. Pre-operative Knee Society Scores (KSS) were recorded and all patients underwent CATKR by a trainee who was supervised by the senior author. The Stryker navigation system was used and a Triatholon Total Knee replacement was implanted. Post-operatively patients had long leg Maquet views to assess component alignment and Post-operative Knee Society Scores at a minimum of 5 years were recorded. Results. Pre-operatively the KSS score was 45.6 (24–59) and function 54 (42–65) with post operative scores for KSS 80.0 (55–94) and function 81 (55–100). Post-operatively the average mechanical tibio-femoral angle for the CATKR group was 1.88 degrees varus, the tibial component angle was 90.63 degrees and the femoral component angle was 89.88 degrees. Conclusions. This is the first study of its kind, looking at the medium term outcome of computer assisted total knee replacements performed by trainee surgeons. Our study demonstrates that satisfactory patient outcomes can be achieved by trainee surgeons undertaking Computer Assisted TKR. Despite the learning curve associated with component positioning, trainees were able to achieve satisfactory alignment using the navigation system

The advantages of computer navigated total knee replacement are well documented in the literature, however, increased surgical time and cost issues remain the major deterrent for the wide use of this technology. Placement of cutting jigs under computer guidance forms a major aspect of computer assisted knee replacement surgery. The use of a motorized mini-robotic cutting jig allows for a more precise and time efficient execution of the femoral cuts under computer guidance. We present a preliminary report on our experience using standard computer assisted surgery (CAS) jigs and mini robotic motorized jigs in computer navigated knee replacement. Methods:. We compared our experience using standard jigs and mini-robotic jigs in knee replacement. A cohort of patients involved in a study comparing navigated and standard total knee replacements received TKA using a Bi-Cruciate Stabilised Knee System. A pilot cohort of patients received total knee replacement using standard computer navigation by the pi galileo system without the mini-robots while awaiting acquisition of the mini robot system. We compared our experience using the same pi galileo system with mini robotic cutting jigs to the cohort without the mini-robotic cutting guides. Results:. Reduction in surgical time was statistically significant when using the motorized mini robotic jigs. Blood loss was identical in both cohorts, and cut precision was better in the cohort with the motorized mini robotic jigs. Conclusion:. The use of the mini robot in navigated knee replacements allows for shorter surgical time, as well as more accurate and precise positioning of the cutting jigs. We believe this is a useful technological addition to navigated knee replacement and deserves further attention and research

There have been mixed reports of the contribution of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to the overall envelope of tibial rotational stability. The effect of single bundle ACL reconstruction on the separate components of internal and external rotational stability respectively is also unclear. We determined the internal and external rotation, and antero-posterior movement of the knee before and after single bundle computer assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in 57 patients. The Orthopilot. ®. ACL (v2) software (BBraun, Aesculap) was used. The mean overall range of tibial rotation was also significantly reduced from 30.5 degrees to 16 degrees (p< 0.0001). The mean internal rotation was significantly reduced from 16 degrees to 8 degrees (p< 0.0001). Mean external rotation was also significantly reduced from 15 degrees to 8 degrees (p< 0.0001). Unlike previous studies we did not find a greater reduction of internal rotation compared with external rotation. The mean antero-posterior movement of the tibia was significantly reduced from 12mm to 4mm (p< 0.0001). The results of this study seem to indicate that computer assisted single bundle ACL reconstruction results in a significant intraoperative improvement in both internal and external rotatory stability as well as a significant improvement in antero-posterior stability

Computer assisted surgical navigation has played an increasingly central role in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the recognized importance of subtle component position changes in knee function, navigation has emerged as a promising tool for reducing the occurrence of significant malalignment. The ability of this technology to reliably measure multiple parameters intraoperatively allows analysis to possibly identify a correlation between intraoperative computer assisted surgical navigation data and functional outcomes of patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty. Intraoperative navigation data was collected for 121 patients undergoing cemented, posterior stabilized TKA. Three forward stepwise regression analyses were performed to associate intraoperative coronal alignment correction, tibiofemoral external rotation, and alignment under varus and valgus stress with one year outcomes, including range of motion, Oxford and SF-36 scores. The amount of alignment correction and the maximum flexion achieved intraoperatively were significantly correlated (p <0.05, R-sq = 13%) with clinically measured maximum flexion at one year. Maximum flexion achieved intraoperatively, external tibiofemoral rotation and maximum varus under stress were also significantly associated (p < 0.05, R-sq = 31%) with the physical component of the SF-36 outcome score. Analyses of computer navigation in TKA to date have primarily focused on precision of sagittal plane correction. Alternatively we have identified four intraoperative parameters that correlate with functional outcome at one year. Correct intraoperative interpretation of navigation data may allow surgeons to make subtle changes in real time to produce superior short-term outcomes for patients

Introduction. Recently, tibial insert design of cruciate-substituting (CS) polyethylene insert is employed. However, in vivo kinematics of using CS polyethylene insert is still unclear. In this study, it is hypothesized that CS polyethylene insert leads to stability of femolo-tibial joint as well as posterior-stabilized (PS) polyethylene insert, even if PCL is sacrificed after TKA. The purpose of this study is an investigation of in vivo kinematics of femolo-tibial joint with use of CS polyethylene insert before and after PCL resction using computer assisted navigation system intra-operatively in TKA. Materials and Methods. Twenty-four consecutive patients who had knees of osteoarthritis with varus deformity were investigated in this study. All TKAs (Triathlon, Stryker) were performed using computer assisted navigation system. In all patients, difference between extension and flexion gap was under 3mm after bony cut of femur and tibia. During surgery, CS polyethylene tibial trial insert were inserted after trial implantation of femoral and tibial components, before and after resection of PCL, respectively. The kinematic parameters of the soft-tissue balance, and amount of coronal (valgus/varus), sagittal (anterior/posterior) and rotational relative movement between femur and tibia were obtained by interpreting kinematics, which display tables throughout the range of motion (ROM) (Figure1). During record of kinematics, the surgeon gently lifted the experimental thigh three times, flexing the hip and knee. In each ROM (30, 45, 60, 90, max degrees), the data were analyzed with paired t-test, and an ANOVA test, and mean values were compared by the multiple comparison test (Turkey HSD test) (p < 0.05). Results. In coronal (valgus/varus) movement, there are no difference between before and after resection of PCL in all ROM. Regarding to amount of sagittal movement of tibia, tibia was slightly shifted approximately 0.75mm posteriorly in 60 degrees of flexion (p=0.013). There are no significance between before and after PCL resection in the other ROM. In addition, concerning ROM, maximum extension angle is significantly lower, and maximum flexion angle is significantly higher after than before PCL resection. Discussion. These results demonstrated that CS polyethylene insert might have a stability of femoro-tibial joint nearly after PCL resection as well as before PCL resection. The main design feature of Triathlon CS insert is single radius and rotary arc, in addition, the posterior lip is same as that of Triathlon CR, which can be the factor to avoid paradoxical anterior movement and to permit internal and external rotation between femoral and tibial component. This study was localized at point of certain situation that difference between extension and flexion gap is under 3mm after bony cut of femur and tibia during surgery. Due to the design features and benefits, there is a high possibility that use of CS insert without PCL can lead same stability as PCL remained, and improvement of ROM. Based on these backgrounds, it is suggested that CS insert may have an additional choice of PCL resection in case of tight gap of flexion in TKA

Reconstructive knee arthroplasty in patients with limb deformity can be a daunting and complex task. These patients are often younger and so post traumatic osteoarthritis poses a real challenge. In view of their relative youth, bone preservation would be favourable; however accurate implantation of components is essential. Formulation of a well calculated plan and accurate execution is essential for successful surgery. We report on a novel method which combines 3D CT joint analysis and computer navigation to define the deformity present pre-operatively and determine whether the proposed reconstruction is feasible. If the reconstructive surgery is feasible, an accurate calculation the correction required is performed. The planned surgery is executed using computer aided navigation surgery. Eight patients have benefited from the technique. Four patients presented with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis and intact anterior cruciate ligament. These patients underwent 3D CT joint analysis and computer assisted navigation surgery to accurately implant unicondylar knee replacements. Four Patients presented with two or three compartment disease. These patients underwent similar 3D CT analysis and navigated Total Knee Replacement. The series demonstrates the merits of 3D CT joint analysis to accurately define deformity and therefore determine pre-operatively feasibility of corrective surgery proposed. The technique is then complimented by computer assisted navigation surgery to ensure the proposed surgical plan is accurately executed

This preliminary study concerns the results of THR using a minimally invasive computer assisted technique: We use the Siguier and Judet procedure. The patient is in supine position and we use an orthopedic table. The skin incision is 6 to 8 cm long and we dont cut any muscle during the approach. The first 30 cases are studied: The navigation system is scanner free and allows different controls: cup inclination and anteversion, center of rotation, laterality, lengh of the lower limb. The acetabular implant is a cementless impacted cup and the femoral implant is either cemented or cementless. The first results are rapported and the technical modifications are descreibed. A randomized study of 50 patients with CAS and 50 without CAS is now begining to determine if the risk of bad positionning the implants in MIS decreases when we use computer assisted surgery

Recent studies suggest the use of computer navigation during TKA can reduce intraoperative blood loss. The purpose of this study was to assess if navigation affected blood loss after TKA in the morbidly obese patient (BMI> 40). Total body blood loss was calculated from body weight, height and haemotocrit change, using a model which accurately assess true blood loss. The computer navigated group comprised of 60 patients, 30 with BMI > 40 and 30 with BMI< 30. The matched conventional knee arthroplasty group consisted of 62 consecutive patients, 31 with BMI> 40 and 31 with BMI< 30 The groups were matched for age, gender, diagnosis and operative technique. Following TKA, the mean total loss was 1014mls (521-1942, SD 312) in the computer assisted group and 1287mls (687-2356, SD 330) in the conventional group. This difference was statistically different (p< 0.001). The mean calculated loss of haemoglobin was 19 g/dl in the navigated group versus 25 g/dl in the conventional group; this was also significant at p< 0.01. The mean total loss was 1105mls in patients with a BMI> 40 in the navigated group compared to 1300mls in the conventional group (p< 0.01). A significant correlation was found between total blood loss and BMI (r=0.2, p< 0.05). This study confirms a highly significant reduction in total body blood loss and calculated Hb loss between computer assisted and conventional TKA in obese patients. Therefore navigation-assisted TKA could present an effective and safe method for reducing blood loss and preventing blood transfusion in obese patients undergoing TKA