Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Total knee replacement is mostly done with alignment rods in order to achieve a proper Varus / Valgus alignement. Other techniques are computer assisted navigation or MRI based preoperative planning. iASSIST™ is a computer assisted stereotaxic surgical instrument system to assist the surgeon in the positioning of the orthopaedic implant system components intra-operatively.
It is imageless and the communication between the PC and the “Pod's” does not require any direct camera view, it is a bluethooth comunication system. This study presents preliminary results utilizing iASSIST™.
The aim of this study was to test and compare radiographic alignment, functional outcomes, and perioperative morbidity of the iASSIST™ Knee system versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS
In a prospective randomized trial we investigated 60 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Each surgical procedure was conducted by highly experienced surgeons. In both groups the implant Legacy LPS-Flex Fixed Bearing Knee was used (Zimmer®, Warsaw, Indiana). The groups were equally divided and randomized by hazard. For clinical evaluation, the Short Form-36 and Knee Society Score were obtained. For the radiological assessment mediCAD® Classic, a digital measurement system, was used. The aim of the study was the comparison of results after 3 months.
Results
2 patients refused any further participation, and 5 cases required a switch to a conventional alignement technique intraoperatively due to technical problems. Average BMI and average age did not differ in both groups.
Surgical time in the iASSIST™ group amounted to 100 minutes, in the conventional group to 76 min. Postoperative functional outcomes were statistically insignificant, showing slight improvements of the Combined Knee Society Score, Knee Society Knee Score, and Knee Society Function Score favouring the iASSIST method, and slight improvements of knee flexion. Short Form-36 physical scales slightly favoured the conventional method but not significantly. The mean deviation from neutral mechanical axis was 1.68°±1.9° within the iASSIST group, and 2.73°±2.1° within the conventional TKA group.
Conclusion
IASSIST™ is a valuable computer navigation system. The 5 technical troubles were due to the learning curve. The clinical results after 3 months did not differ significantly, the radiological assessment showed a tendency of improved alignement in the iASSIST™ group.
