A Morel-Lavallee lesion (MLL) is a benign cystic lesion that occurs due to injury to the soft-tissue envelope's perforating vascular and lymphatic systems, resulting in a distinctive hemolymphatic fluid accumulation between the tissue layers. The MLL has the potential to make a significant impact on the treatment of orthopaedic injuries.

A 79-year-old male patient community ambulatory with assisting aid (cane) known case of Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, bronchial asthma and ischemic heart disease. He was brought to the Emergency, complaining of right hip discomfort and burning sensation for the last 5 days with no history of recent trauma at all. Patient had history of right trochanteric femur fracture 3 years ago, treated with DHS in a privet service. Clinical and Radiological assessment showed that the patient mostly has acute MLL due to lag screw cut out. We offered the patient the surgical intervention, but he refused despite explaining the risks of complications if not treated and preferred to receive the conservative treatment. Compression therapy management explained to him including biker's shorts (instructed to be worn full-time a day) and regular follow up in clinic. Symptom's improvement was reported by the patient in the subsequent visits.

In the polytrauma patient, a delayed diagnosis of these lesions is conceivable due to the presence of more visible injuries. It's located over the greater trochanter more commonly, but sometimes in other areas such as the lower lumbar region, the thigh, or the calf. Incorrect or delayed diagnosis and care can have unfavorable outcomes such as infection, pseudocyst development, and cosmetologically deformity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound will aid in MLL diagnosis. However, the effectiveness of MLL therapy remains debatable.

We strongly believe that the MLL caused due to tangential shear forces applied to the soft tissue leads to accumulation of the blood and/or lymph between the subcutaneous and overlying fascia and it often misdiagnosed due to other distracting injuries. Nontheless, in our case we reported MLL occur due to internal pressure on the fascia caused by cut out of DHS lag screw.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse the radiological outcomes and predictors of avascular necrosis following 2-hole DHS in Garden I and II neck of femur fractures in patients more than 60 years with a minimum follow up of one year.

We retrospectively reviewed 51 consecutive patients aged more than 60 years who underwent DHS fixation for Garden I and II fractures. Demographics, fracture classification, time to surgery, pre-operative AMTS, preoperative posterior tilt angle, quality of reduction, pre and post-operative haemoglobin(hb), creatinine and comorbidities were analysed for correlation with AVN using Chi-Square test, Independent Sample and paired t test.

There were 40 (78.4%) females and the mean age of the cohort was 77 years. 28 and 23 were Garden I and II NOF fractures respectively. Union was observed in all our patients except one(kappa =1). 12/51(23.5%) developed AVN of the femoral head. Statistically significant higher incidence of AVN was noted in patients with a pre-op tilt angle > 200 (p = 0.006). The mean drop in Hb was higher in patients who developed AVN (21.5 g/L) versus the non-AVN group (15.9 g/L) (p = 0.001). There was no difference in AVN rates with respect to laterality, mean time to surgery, pre-op AMTS and Charlson comorbidity index. 4/52 (7.6%) had re-operations (one hardware prominence, two conversions to arthroplasty, one fixation failure during the immediate post-op period). The 30-day and one year mortality rates were 1.9 % and 11.7 % respectively.

2-hole DHS fixation in undisplaced NOF fractures has excellent union rates. A pre-operative posterior tilt angle of >200 and a greater difference in pre and post operative haemoglobin were found to correlate positively with the progression to AVN . No correlation was observed between AVN and time to surgery, laterality, quality of reduction and comorbidities.

Introduction Intertrochanteric fractures are common and represent a major source of morbidity and mortality. As with all orthopaedic implants a DHS can fail. One of the most important predictors of failure has been shown to be the Tip-Apex Distance (TAD). An audit was carried to assess the following:

What was our rate of cut out and implant failure?

Methods An audit of the case notes and x-rays of 54 consecutive patients with hip fractures, treated with DHS, within a twelve-month period were reviewed. Demographic data, grade of surgeon, fracture stability, DHS position, mortality and implant failure were assessed.

Findings Our rate of failure was 2 out of 54 patients, 3.7%. Both of the patients that failed had a TAD of greater than 20mm, and none of the patients with a TAD below 20mm required further surgery. There was no statistical correlation between TAD and grade of operating surgeon.

Recommendations It is paramount importance to ensure that the basic principles of DHS position are well taught to surgical trainees in order to reduce the risk of failure. Following DHS fixation, patients should be followed up for a minimum of 3 months until evidence of radiographic union is evident. DHS failure rates and screw positions should be constantly audited to ensure that failure rates are minimised.

Purpose of the study: To compare the DHS plate fixation with the Targon PF nail for the treatment of intratro-chanteric fractures.

Material and methods: This was a prospective randomized study including 60 patients hospitalized in the emergency setting between December 2003 and June 2004for intratrochanteric fractures. The AO classification was used. We analyzed: patient status (ASA), operative time (type of implant, duration), the postoperative period (blood loss, radiologic findings, duration of hospital stay, early postoperative complications) and at last follow-up, Harris hip score, date of resumed walking, mortality. Patients were assessed at three months postop. This study included 60 patients, 34 with a Targon PF nail and 26 with a DHS. Mean patient age for nailing was 81 years (SD 12.8, range 23–86); for DHS it was 82 years (SD 9.8; range 47–97).

Results: Mean blood loss was 410 ml with the Targon PF nail and 325 ml with the DHS, a nearly significant difference (p=0.07). The other results did not demonstrate any significant difference. At three months five cases of screw cut out were noted. Bone healing was achieved in all cases. The Trargon PF nail and the DHS provide equivalent results, with less bleeding an lesser cost for the DHS.

Introduction: The main problem using first generation Gamma-nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures has been a high frequency of intra- and postoperative femoral fractures. The TGN was thought to represent an improvement in design and potentially a less invasive treatment.

Material and methods: 146 fractures were randomised prospectively to either DHS or TGN. The 2 groups were comparable regarding age, gender and fracture type (AO). Follow-up was carried out after 4 and 12 months.

Results: Average operation time in the TGN group was 63 min (SD=30min) and 48 min (SD=23) in the DHS group (p=0.0016). There was no difference in intra-operative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay or mortality. Two femoral fractures occurred postoperatively in the TGN group. At follow-up 12 patients in the TGN and 6 patients in the DHS group had had a reoperation (p> 0.05). Six reoperations in the TGN group and 3 in the DHS group resulted in preservation of the hip joint. The remaining patients had an arthroplasty or a Girdlestone resection. Poor reduction and/or positioning of the implant was significantly correlated to the risk of reoperation (p< 0.001). Specific technical errors could be identified among 3 fractures in the TGN group leading to reoperation. Any correlation between fracture type and reoperation could not be demonstrated.

Conclusion: In this study operation time was significantly longer in the TGN group. Among other variables no significant differences could be demonstrated. In our department, with a high number of residents performing these operations, the DHS will continue to be the standard implant. Whether the TGN has a place in a subgroup of intertrochanteric fractures, operated by specialized surgeons, needs further investigation.

Background: A radiological audit of the local use of the Dynamic Hip Screw in extracapsular proximal femur fractures. Study aim: to identify cases of mechanical failure and revision, to determine predictors of fixation failure.

Methods: A retrospective radiological review of 567 consecutive cases at Western Australian tertiary hospitals over a 3 year period (2002 – 2004) using the Picture Archive Computer System (PACS).

Results: Female: male ratio was 2.79: 1. Evan’s classification: 418 fractures stable (73.7%), 149 unstable (26.3%). Failure of fixation occurred in 14 cases (2.5%); ten due to hip screw cut out (1.8%) and four due to plate pull off (0.8%). All cases of cut out had a significantly higher mean tip apex distance (TAD) (31 vs 20mm, P < 0.001) and an unstable fracture configuration; 8 of 10 had a poor reduction. Bivariate logistical regression revealed TAD of 25mm or more to be most predictive of cut out; followed by mean TAD, superior anterior and inferior posterior screw placement, unstable fracture configuration and poor reduction. Unassociated factors included gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists’ score, plate angle and length, operation time and surgeon level. A three-variable model found TAD of 25mm or more and unstable fracture configuration to be predictive, but not poor reduction. Cases with a TAD of 25mm or more with unstable fracture configuration and a poor reduction had a 21.6% chance of cut out (8 of 29).

Conclusions: This is the first multifactorial multivariate analysis of a single implant sliding hip screw series. Compared with the literature, the rate of failure is low. Possible reasons include appropriate choice of implant for fracture type, improved performance with use of a single model of implant, and low exclusion rates due to the use of PACS.

Aims. To evaluate if, for orthopaedic trainees, additional cadaveric simulation training or standard training alone yields superior radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. Methods. This was a preliminary, pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled trial in nine secondary and tertiary NHS hospitals in England. Researchers were blinded to group allocation. Overall, 40 trainees in the West Midlands were eligible: 33 agreed to take part and were randomized, five withdrew after randomization, 13 were allocated cadaveric training, and 15 were allocated standard training. The intervention was an additional two-day cadaveric simulation course. The control group received standard on-the-job training. Primary outcome was implant position on the postoperative radiograph: tip-apex distance (mm) (DHS) and leg length discrepancy (mm) (hemiarthroplasty). Secondary clinical outcomes were procedure time, length of hospital stay, acute postoperative complication rate, and 12-month mortality. Procedure-specific secondary outcomes were intraoperative radiation dose (for DHS) and postoperative blood transfusion requirement (hemiarthroplasty). Results. Eight female (29%) and 20 male trainees (71%), mean age 29.4 years, performed 317 DHS operations and 243 hemiarthroplasties during ten months of follow-up. Primary analysis was a random effect model with surgeon-level fixed effects of patient condition, patient age, and surgeon experience, with a random intercept for surgeon. Under the intention-to-treat principle, for hemiarthroplasty there was better implant position in favour of cadaveric training, measured by leg length discrepancy ≤ 10 mm (odds ratio (OR) 4.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 14.22); p = 0.027). There were significantly fewer postoperative blood transfusions required in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty by cadaveric-trained compared to standard-trained surgeons (OR 6.00 (95% CI 1.83 to 19.69); p = 0.003). For DHS, there was no significant between-group difference in implant position as measured by tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm (OR 6.47 (95% CI 0.97 to 43.05); p = 0.053). No between-group differences were observed for any secondary clinical outcomes. Conclusion. Trainees randomized to additional cadaveric training performed hip fracture fixation with better implant positioning and fewer postoperative blood transfusions in hemiarthroplasty. This effect, which was previously unknown, may be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):602–611

We biomechanically investigated whether the standard dynamic hip screw (DHS) or the DHS blade achieves better fixation in bone with regard to resistance to pushout, pullout and torsional stability. The experiments were undertaken in an artificial bone substrate in the form of polyurethane foam blocks with predefined mechanical properties. Pushout tests were also repeated in cadaveric femoral heads. The results showed that the DHS blade outperformed the DHS with regard to the two most important characteristics of implant fixation, namely resistance to pushout and rotational stability. We concluded that the DHS blade was the superior implant in this study

Background. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is the most frequently used implant in management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. There is a known statistical relationship between a tip-apex distance (TAD) >25mm and higher rate of implant failure. Our aim was to analyse all DHS procedures performed in our trust from seventeen months and compare their TAD values to the acceptable standard of ≤25mm. Methods. All patients undergoing DHS between April 2020-August 2021 were identified from our theatre system. Additionally, those presenting to hospital with implant failures were included. Patient demographics, date of surgery, fracture classification (AO) and date/mode of failure were recorded. Intraoperative fluoroscopy images were reviewed to calculate TAD, screw location and neck shaft angles by two independent observers. Results. 215 patients were identified, five of which were excluded due to inadequate fluoroscopy. Failure was seen in 3.3% of the cohort (n=7), of which 71.4% had an unacceptable TAD. In total, 21 patients (10%) had TAD >25mm, of whom 12 had superiorly and 15 had posteriorly placed screws. There were no failures in patients with a TAD of <20mm whereas a TAD >30mm had 50% failure rate. Conclusion. This audit reinforces the importance of aiming for a low TAD (preferably <20mm) intraoperatively. It is also desirable to avoid superiorly and significantly posteriorly placed screws. Implications. Complex hip revision surgery in the elderly bears substantial financial implications to the NHS and, more importantly, causes prolonged morbidity to the patient. Adhering to established standards will ensure reduced implant failure and best patient care

A number of techniques have been developed to improve the immediate mechanical anchorage of implants for enhancing implant longevity. This issue becomes even more relevant in patients with osteoporosis who have fragile bone. We have previously shown that a dynamic hip screw (DHS) can be augmented with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite (CaS/HA) based injectable biomaterial to increase the immediate mechanical anchorage of the DHS system to saw bones with a 400% increase in peak extraction force compared to un-augmented DHS. The results were also at par with bone cement (PMMA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CaS/HA augmentation on the integration of a different fracture fixation device (gamma nail lag-screw) with osteoporotic saw bones. Osteoporotic saw bones (bone volume fraction = 15%) were instrumented with a gamma nail without augmentation (n=8) or augmented (n=8) with a CaS/HA biomaterial (Cerament BVF, Bonesupport AB, Sweden) using a newly developed augmentation method described earlier. The lag-screws from both groups were then pulled out at a displacement rate of 0.5 mm/s until failure. Peak extraction force was recorded for each specimen along with photographs of the screws post-extraction. A non-parametric t-test was used to compare the two groups. CaS/HA augmentation of the lag-screw led to a 650% increase in the peak extraction force compared with the controls (p<0.01). Photographs of the augmented samples shows failure of the saw-bones further away from the implant-bone interface indicating a protective effect of the CaS/HA material. We present a novel method to enhance the immediate mechanical anchorage of a lag-screw to osteoporotic bone and it is also envisaged that CaS/HA augmentation combined with systemic bisphosphonate treatment can lead to new bone formation and aid in the reduction of implant failures and re-operations

Extracapsular Hip Fractures (EHF's) are a significant health burden on healthcare services. Optimal treatment is controversial with conflicting evidence being reported. Currently treatment is undertaken with Intramedullary Nail (IMN) or Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) constructs with a recent increase in IMN use (1). This study aims to conduct a systematic review of Randomised Control Trials published between 2020 and 2023 with particular focus on patient demographics and holistic patient outcomes. Using a unified search-protocol, RCT's published between 2020 and 2023 were collected from CENTRAL, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Rayyan software screened duplicates. Using the CASP and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool papers were critically examined twice, and Blood Loss, Infection and Mobility described the patient journey. Patient demographics were recorded and were contrasted with geographically diverse cohort studies to compare population differences. Parametric tests were used to determine significance levels between population demographics, namely Age and Sex. Eleven papers were included, representing 908 patients (436 Male). The mean age for patients was 64.39. There was considerable risk of bias in 7/11 studies owing to the randomization process and the recording of data. Four Cohort studies were selected for comparison representing 14314 patients. Mean age was significantly different between Cohort Studies and RCT's (Independent T-Test, df 13, t=7.8, p = <0.001, mean difference = 19.251, 95% CI = 13.888, 24.613). This was also true for sex ratios included in the studies (df 13, t = -2.268, p = 0.024, Mean Difference = -0.4884, 95% CI = -0.9702, -0.0066). To conclude, RCT's published in the post COVID-19 era are not representative of patient demographics. This has the potential to provide inaccurate information for implant selection. Additionally further research must be conducted in how to better improve RCT patient inclusion so as to be more representative of patients whilst balancing the risks of operations

The incidence of hip fractures in the elderly is increasing. Minimally displaced and un-displaced hip fractures can be treated with either internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty. The aim was identifying the revision rate of internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty in patients 60 years or older with Garden I or II hip fractures and to identify risk factors associated with each method. A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2 Major Trauma Centres and 9 Trauma Units between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2020. Patients managed conservatively, treated with a total hip replacement and missing data were excluded from the study. 1273 patients were included of which 26.2% (n=334) had cannulated hip fixation (CHF), 19.4% (n=247) had a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and 54.7% (n=692) had a hemiarthroplasty. 66 patients in total (5.2%) required revision surgery. The revision rates for CHF, DHS and hemiarthroplasty were 14.4%, 4%, 1.2% (p<0.001) respectively. Failed fixation was the most common reason for revision with the incidence increasing by 7-fold in the CHF group [45.8% (n=23) vs. 33.3% (n=3) in DHS; p<0.01]. The risk factors identified for CHF revision were age >80 (p<0.05), female gender (p<0.05) and smoking (p<0.05). The average length of hospital stay was decreased when using CHF compared to DHS and hemiarthroplasty (12.6 days vs 14.9 days vs 18.1 days respectively, p<0.001) and the 1 year mortality rate for CHF, DHS and hemiarthroplasty was 2.5%, 2% and 9% respectively. Fixation methods for Garden I and II hip fractures in elderly patients are associated with a higher revision rate than hemiarthroplasty. CHF has the highest revision rate at 14.4% followed by DHS and hemiarthroplasty. Female patients, patients over the age of 80 and patients with poor bone quality are considered high risk for fixation failure with CHF. When considering a fixation method in such patients, DHS is more robust than a screw construct, followed by hemiarthroplasty

Aims. To develop a core outcome set of measurements from postoperative radiographs that can be used to assess technical skill in performing dynamic hip screw (DHS) and hemiarthroplasty, and to validate these against Van der Vleuten’s criteria for effective assessment. Methods. A Delphi exercise was undertaken at a regional major trauma centre to identify candidate measurement items. The feasibility of taking these measurements was tested by two of the authors (HKJ, GTRP). Validity and reliability were examined using the radiographs of operations performed by orthopaedic resident participants (n = 28) of a multicentre randomized controlled educational trial (ISRCTN20431944). Trainees were divided into novice and intermediate groups, defined as having performed < ten or ≥ ten cases each for DHS and hemiarthroplasty at baseline. The procedure-based assessment (PBA) global rating score was assumed as the gold standard assessment for the purposes of concurrent validity. Intra- and inter-rater reliability testing were performed on a random subset of 25 cases. Results. In total, 327 DHS and 248 hemiarthroplasty procedures were performed by 28 postgraduate year (PGY) 3 to 5 orthopaedic trainees during the 2014 to 2015 surgical training year at nine NHS hospitals in the West Midlands, UK. Overall, 109 PBAs were completed for DHS and 80 for hemiarthroplasty. Expert consensus identified four ‘final product analysis’ (FPA) radiological parameters of technical success for DHS: tip-apex distance (TAD); lag screw position in the femoral head; flushness of the plate against the lateral femoral cortex; and eight-cortex hold of the plate screws. Three parameters were identified for hemiarthroplasty: leg length discrepancy; femoral stem alignment; and femoral offset. Face validity, content validity, and feasibility were excellent. For all measurements, performance was better in the intermediate compared with the novice group, and this was statistically significant for TAD (p < 0.001) and femoral stem alignment (p = 0.023). Concurrent validity was poor when measured against global PBA score. This may be explained by the fact that they are measuring difference facets of competence. Intra-and inter-rater reliability were excellent for TAD, moderate for lag screw position (DHS), and moderate for leg length discrepancy (hemiarthroplasty). Use of a large multicentre dataset suggests good generalizability of the results to other settings. Assessment using FPA was time- and cost-effective compared with PBA. Conclusion. Final product analysis using post-implantation radiographs to measure technical skill in hip fracture surgery is feasible, valid, reliable, and cost-effective. It can complement traditional workplace-based assessment for measuring performance in the real-world operating room . It may have particular utility in competency-based training frameworks and for assessing skill transfer from the simulated to live operating theatre. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:594–604

The aim of the study was to compare mortalitiy and complication rate after operative treatment of pertrochanteric fractures with primary cemented arthroplasty, dynamic hip screw (DHS) or proximal femoral nail (PFN). 283 patients, which were treated betwen 1992 and 2005 for pertrochanteric femoral fractures, except pathologic fractures and a minimum age of sixty years were included. 132 of these 283 patients were treated by primary arthroplasty. Up to the end of 1999 all unstable fractures were treated by primary total hip replacement. In the year 2000 the PFN was introduced and only patients with severe osteoarthritis and osteoporosis received primary arthroplasty. I possible, more stable fractures were treated with a DHS. One year mortality was chosen as main indicator as it depends on the surgical trauma as well as the rapid return to preinjury activity and further complications. A one year period was chosen as the mortality ratio approaches that of an age matched reference population after this interval. Influencing cofactors were eliminated by stepwise logistic regression analysis. It was shown that restoration of the preoperative ambulatory level correlated with survival rate after one year. As elderly patients are often unable to cooperate with partial weight bearing, the primary stability of the device is crucial to allow early mobilisation. Mortality was significantly influenced by age, gender and comorbidities but not by fracture classification. One-year mortality was significantly higher for primary total hip replacement (34.2 %) than for internal fixation (DHS: 18.4 %; PFN 21.4 %) and hemiarthroplasty (13.3 %). Since the PFN and hemiarthroplasty were introduced the over all mortality was reduced from 29 % to 18 %. Conclusion: For stable fractures a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and for unstable fractures a short proximal femoral nail (PFN) can be recommended. Primary cemented hemiarthroplasty is a viable option for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures if osteoporosis prevents from full weight bearing or if osteoarthritis makes further operations likely. Primary total hip replacement should be avoided, due to the fact that dislocation and mortality were significantly higher than in the other groups

Objectives. The use of two implants to manage concomitant ipsilateral femoral shaft and proximal femoral fractures has been indicated, but no studies address the relationship of dynamic hip screw (DHS) side plate screws and the intramedullary nail where failure might occur after union. This study compares different implant configurations in order to investigate bridging the gap between the distal DHS and tip of the intramedullary nail. Methods. A total of 29 left synthetic femora were tested in three groups: 1) gapped short nail (GSN); 2) unicortical short nail (USN), differing from GSN by the use of two unicortical bridging screws; and 3) bicortical long nail (BLN), with two angled bicortical and one unicortical bridging screws. With these findings, five matched-pairs of cadaveric femora were tested in two groups: 1) unicortical long nail (ULN), with a longer nail than USN and three bridging unicortical screws; and 2) BLN. Specimens were axially loaded to 22.7 kg (50 lb), and internally rotated 90°/sec until failure. Results. For synthetic femora, a difference was detected between GSN and BLN in energy to failure (p = 0.04) and torque at failure (p = 0.02), but not between USN and other groups for energy to failure (vs GSN, p = 0.71; vs BLN, p = 0.19) and torque at failure (vs GSN, p = 0.55; vs BLN, p = 0.15). For cadaveric femora, ULN and BLN performed similarly because of the improvement provided by the bridging screws. Conclusions. Our study shows that bicortical angled screws in the DHS side plate are superior to no screws at all in this model and loading scenario, and suggests that adding unicortical screws to a gapped construct is probably beneficial

Background. Hip fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality, affecting 70,000 people in the UK each year. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) is used for the osteosynthesis of extracapsular neck of femur fractures, a procedure that requires complex psychomotor skills to achieve optimal lag screw positioning. The tip-apex distance (TAD) is a measure of the position of the lag screw from the apex of the femoral head, and is the most comprehensive predictor of cut-out (failure of the DHS construct). To develop these skills, trainees need exposure to the procedure, however with the European Working Time Directive, this is becoming harder to achieve. Simulation can be used as an adjunct to theatre learning, however it is limited. FluoroSim is a digital fluoroscopy simulator that can be used in conjunction with workshop bones to simulate the first step of the DHS procedure (guide-wire insertion) using image guidance. This study assessed the construct validity of FluoroSim. The null hypothesis stated that there would be no difference in the objective metrics recorded from FluoroSim between users with different exposure to the DHS procedure. Methods. This multicentre study recruited twenty-six orthopaedic doctors. They were categorised into three groups based on the number of DHS procedures they had completed as the primary surgeon (novice <10, intermediate 10≤x<40 and experienced ≥40). Twenty-six participants completed a single DHS guide-wire attempt into a workshop bone using FluoroSim. The TAD, procedural time, number of radiographs, number of guide-wire retires and cut-out rate (COR) were recorded for each attempt. Results. A significant construct effect was seen for TAD and COR between novice and other users (p < 0.05). The intermediate and experienced users were not significantly different for these metrics. For all other metrics, experienced users had the highest score, contrary to expectation. Conclusion. FluoroSim was able to separate novice users from other cohorts for the two clinically significant outcome metrics. We can therefore partially reject the null hypothesis as construct validity was present for TAD and COR. We have demonstrated that FluoroSim has the potential to be a useful adjunct when learning the psychomotor skills needed for the DHS procedure away from theatre

Background. Radiation exposure remains a significant occupational hazard for Orthopaedic surgeons. There are no references values for trauma procedures performed with Image Intensifier (II). We aimed to determine and compare reference values for patient radiation exposure for common trauma operations, and to analyse the effect of surgeon grade on II usage. Methods. Data collected prospectively from 849 cases between 01/05/2013 and 01/10/2014 were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate reference values for dose area product (DAP), screening time (ST), and number of II images taken for common trauma procedures where n>9 (n=808). Results. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation required significantly less radiation than proximal femoral nail (PFN) for intertrochanteric hip fractures for median DAP (668mG/cm2 vs 1040mG/cm2, p<0.001), ST (00:36 vs 00:48, p<0.001), and number of II images (65 vs 110, p<0.001). Radiation exposure was statistically significantly less when Consultant Orthopaedic surgeons were first surgeon compared to Staff grade doctors and Orthopaedic trainees for DAP (90.55mGy/cm2 vs 175.5mGy/cm2 vs 366.5mGy/cm2), screening time (00:26 vs 00:32 vs 00:36), and number of II images (49 vs 59 vs 66). Conclusions. We reported reference values for common trauma operations that are essential to enable monitoring of patient radiation exposure. PFN required greater radiation exposure than DHS for intertrochanteric hip fracture. Increased surgical experience lead to lower radiation exposure in trauma operations, which could be developed to assess trauma competence within surgical training. Level of evidence. III

Background. The advantages of treatment by open reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur have been well known for several decades. Failure of fixation can result in revision surgery, prolonged inpatient stay and has major socio-economic consequences. There are many new devices on the market to help deal with this problem. Expandable hip screw (EHS) is one such device, which is an expanding bolt that may offer superior fixation in osteoporotic bone compared to the standard dynamic hip screw (DHS) type device. Methods. Static axial compression tests with elastic deformation of the specimens were performed with a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min to determine stiffness of testing was performed with 3 cycles from 0 N to 250 N, 3 cycles from 0 N to 500 N, 3 cycles from 0 N to 750 N and 3 cycles from 0 N to 1000 N with a holding time of 10 s per test cycle. Displacement control was apply the pullout strength with a velocity of 1mm/sec. The ability to resist rotation about the axis of a lag screw is of critical importance particularly when the fracture line is perpendicular, or nearly perpendicular, to the femoral neck. Implants were subjected to a rotation of 1 degree/sec and peak torque values were recorded. Results. The mean axial cyclic loading DHS showed higher stiffness value than EHS. The mean stiffness achieved at pullout test in the EHS and DHS groups were 587.8N/mm and, 334.1N/mm respectively (p<0.05). The peak torque for the EHS device was significantly greater than the torque for the DHS with torque values of 4.56 Nm/degree and 2.97 Nm/degree, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusions. The EHS device demonstrated superior resistance to pullout and torsion greater loads compared to the DHS in an unstable fracture model. However, axial cyclic loading demonstrate lower strength, by optimising the size of device will perform. Level of Evidence. Level 5

A tip-apex distance (TAD) greater than 25 mm is a strong predictor of screw cut-out in patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS). We aim to show you a simple and reliable way to check this. By calculating the sum of the distance from the tip of the screw to the apex of the femoral head on anteroposterior and lateral views the TAD is found. X-rays often have magnification errors and therefore measuring tools in digital x-ray systems will be inaccurate. The original method of calculating the TAD uses the known diameter of the screw to avoid magnification errors. We found that due to the no-cylindrical shape of the screw shaft there is potential of an inaccurate measurement. By using the distance across the highest points of the thread a more accurate TAD can be calculated. The distance across the highest points of the threads in all three of the most commonly used DHSs in the UK is 13 mm. If the measured distance from the tip of the screw to the apex of the femoral head in both the anteroposterior and lateral views is less than the measured distance across of the treaded diameter of the screw then the surgeon knows the TAD is less than 26 mm. This method can be used intraoperatively to check the TAD by looking at the fluoroscopy images in these two views

Background. Training within surgery is changing from the traditional Halstedian apprenticeship model. There is need for objective assessment of trainees, especially their technical skills, to ensure they are safe to practice and to highlight areas for development. In addition, due to working time restrictions in both the UK and the US, theatre time is being limited for trainees, reducing their opportunities to learn such technical skills. Simulation is one adjunct to training that can be utilised to both assess trainees objectively, and provide a platform for trainees to develop their skills in a safe and controlled environment. The insertion of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) relies on complex psychomotor skills to obtain an optimal implant position. The tip-apex distance (TAD) is a measurement of this positioning, used to predict failure of the implant. These skills can be obtained away from theatre using workshop bone simulation, however this method does not utilise fluoroscopy due to the associated radiation risks. FluoroSim is a novel digital fluoroscopy simulator that can recreate digital radiographs with workshop bone simulation for the insertion of a DHS guide-wire. In this study, we present the training effect demonstrated on FluoroSim. The null hypothesis states that no difference will be present between users with different amounts of exposure to FluoroSim. Methods. Medical students were recruited from three London universities and randomised into a training (n=23) and a control (n=22) cohort. All participants watched a video explanation of the simulator and task and were blinded to their allocation. Training participants completed 10 attempts in total, 5 attempts in week one, followed by a one week wash out period, followed by 5 attempts in week 2. The control group completed a single attempt each week. For each attempt, 5 metrics were recorded; TAD, procedural time, number of radiographs, number of guide-wire retires and cut-out rate (COR). Results. No significant difference was present for any metric between the groups at baseline; randomisation had produced heterogeneous groups minimising selection bias. Intragroup training effect (comparison of initial and last attempt) was significant for all metrics in the training group (p < 0.05) but for no metrics in the control group. The intergroup training effect (comparison of training group attempt ten to control group attempt ten) was present for procedural time, number of radiographs and number of guide-wire retries (p < 0.05). Significance was not reached for TAD and COR. Conclusion. FluoroSim shows skill acquisition with repeat exposure, so the null hypothesis can be rejected. This study has demonstrated the merits of FluoroSim as a training adjunct for psychomotor skill development in a DHS setting

We have prospectively compared the fixation of 100 intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in elderly patients with random use of either a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or a new intramedullary device, the Gamma nail. We found no difference in operating time, blood loss, wound complications, stay in hospital, place of eventual discharge, or the patients' mobility at final review. There was no difference in failure of proximal fixation: cut-out occurred in three cases with the DHS, and twice with the Gamma nail. However, in four cases fracture of the femur occurred close to the Gamma nail, requiring further major surgery. In the absence of these complications, union was seen by six months in both groups

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the failure rate among different fixation devices for undisplaced fracture neck of femur. All 52 patients with Garden I and II hip fractures who underwent surgery in a teaching hospital in London from January 2007 to June 2012 were included. Electronic patient records were accessed to collect the patient data. There were 52% females and the mean age of patients was 70 years. Thirty patients had cannulated screws, 18 – dynamic hip screw (DHS) with de-rotation screw and 4 had DHS alone. Initial results showed that 36% patients had re-operation. 7(77%) had total hip replacement and 1(11%) had metal work removal. The reason for revision was failure of fixation in 8 (88%) and avascular necrosis in 1 (11%). There was significantly higher failure rate in the DHS with derotation screw group (50%) compared to the cannulated screw group (35%) and the DHS alone group (0%). Average time to planned revision was 11.1 months. Traditionally undisplaced intra capsular hip fractures are treated by in-situ fixation using different devices. Biomechanically DHS with de-rotation screw achieves better rotational and axial stability compared to other fixation devices. However, our study showed a higher failure rate in this group. Inability to achieve a perfectly parallel screw position seems to be a significant factor responsible for high failure. Higher failure rates with fixation may boost the role of replacement arthroplasty as one off surgical treatment in elderly patients

Aims: To compare the results between intramedullary hip screw (IMHS) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) regarding operative time and radiation exposure time Methods:We reviewed radiation exposure times obtained during the fixation of 281 extracapsular proximal femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw was used in 148, and intramedullary hip screw was used in 133. Results: The results showed that there was no statistical difference in ionising radiation exposure in closed reduction of these fractures regardless of fracture configuration or surgical experience of the surgeon, but there was a statistical difference in implant insertion time and radiation exposure (p= < 0.05). Conclusions: We conclude that intramed-ullary implant takes more radiation exposure because they take more time for insertion, which is irrespective of surgical experience and complexity of fracture

Intra-operative Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) estimation optimises dynamic hip screw (DHS) placement during hip fracture fixation, reducing risk of cut-out. Thread-width of a standard DHS screw measures approximately 12.5 millimetres. We assessed the effect of introducing screw thread-width as an intra-operative distance reference to surgeons. The null hypothesis was that there were no differences between hip fracture fixation before and after this intervention. Primary outcome measure was TAD. Secondary outcome measures included position of the screw in the femoral head, quality of reduction, cut-out and surgeon accuracy of estimating TAD. 150 intra-operative DHS radiographs were assessed before and after introducing screw thread-width distance reference to surgeons. Mean TAD reduced from 19.37mm in the control group to 16.49mm in the prospective group (p=<0.001). The number of DHS with a TAD > 25mm reduced from 14% to 6%. Screw position on lateral radiographs was significantly improved (p=0.004). There were no significant differences in screw position on antero-posterior radiographs, quality of reduction, or rate of cut-out. Significant improvement in accuracy (p=0.05) and precision (p=0.005) of TAD estimation was demonstrated. Awareness and use of screw-thread width improves estimation and positioning of a DHS screw in the femoral head during fixation of hip fractures

Three Cannulated Screws (3CS), Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) with antirotation screw (DHS–Screw) or with a Blade (DHS–Blade) are the gold standards for fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. Compared to 3CS, both DHS systems require larger skin incision with more extensive soft tissue dissection while providing the benefit of superior stability. The newly designed Femoral Neck System (FNS) for dynamic fixation combines the advantages of angular stability with a less invasive surgical technique. The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical performance of FNS in comparison to established methods for fixation of the femoral neck in a human cadaveric model. Twenty pairs of fresh–frozen human cadaveric femora were instrumented with either DHS–Screw, DHS–Blade, 3CS or FNS. A reduced unstable femoral neck fracture 70° Pauwels III, AO/OTA31–B2.3 was simulated with 30° distal and 15° posterior wedges. Cyclic axial loading was applied in 16° adduction, starting at 500N and with progressive peak force increase of 0.1N/cycle until construct failure. Relative interfragmentary movements were evaluated with motion tracking. Highest axial stiffness was observed for FNS (748.9 ± 66.8 N/mm), followed by DHS–Screw (688.8 ± 44.2 N/mm), DHS–Blade (629.1 ± 31.4 N/mm) and 3CS (584.1 ± 47.2 N/mm) with no statistical significances between the implant constructs. Cycles until 15 mm leg shortening were comparable for DHS–Screw (20542 ± 2488), DHS–Blade (19161 ± 1264) and FNS (17372 ± 947), and significantly higher than 3CS (7293 ± 850), p<0.001. Similarly, cycles until 15 mm femoral neck shortening were comparable between DHS–Screw (20846 ± 2446), DHS–Blade (18974 ± 1344) and FNS (18171 ± 818), and significantly higher than 3CS (8039 ± 838), p<0.001. From a biomechanical point of view, the Femoral Neck System is a valid alternative to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, representing the advantages of a minimal invasive angle–stable implant for dynamic fixation with comparable stability to the two DHS systems with blade or screw, and superior to Three Cannulated Screws

Background. Hip fractures affect 1.6 million people globally per annum, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A large proportion are extracapsular neck of femur fractures, treated with the dynamic hip screw (DHS). Mechanical failure due to cut-out is seen in up to 7% of DHS implants. The most important predictor of cut-out is the tip-apex distance (TAD), a numerical value of the lag screw”s position in the femoral head. This distance is determined by the psychomotor skills of the surgeon guided by fluoroscopic imaging in theatre. With the current state of surgical training, it is harder for junior trainees to gain exposure to these operations, resulting in reduced practice. Additionally, methods of simulation using workshop bones do not utilise the imaging component due to the associated radiation risks. We present a digital fluoroscopy software, FluoroSim, a realistic, affordable, and accessible fluoroscopic simulation tool that can be used with workshop bones to simulate the first step of the DHS procedure. Additionally, we present the first round of accuracy tests with this software. Methods. The software was developed at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, England. Two orthogonally placed cameras were used to track two coloured markers attached to a DHS guide-wire. Affine transformation matrices were used in both the anterior-posterior (AP) and cross table lateral (CTL) planes to match three points from the camera image of the workshop bone to three points on a pre-loaded hip radiograph. The two centre points of each marker were identified with image processing algorithms and utilised to digitally produce a line representing the guide-wire on the two radiographs. To test the accuracy of the system, the software generated 3D guide-wire apex distance (GAD) (from the tip of the guide-wire to a marker at the centre of calibration) was compared to the same distance measured with a digital calliper (MGAD). In addition, the same accuracy value was determined in a simulation scenario, from 406 attempts by 67 medical students. Results. The median absolute inaccuracy of FluoroSim with 270 measurements was 3.35mm (IQR = [1.15mm, 6.53mm]). The absolute inaccuracy showed a graded increase the further away the tip of the guide-wire was from the centre of calibration; MGAD ≤10mm, median absolute inaccuracy = 1.53mm; MGAD 10mm<x≤20mm, median absolute inaccuracy = 4.97mm; MGAD >20mm, median absolute inaccuracy = 7.23mm. Comparison between all three groups reached significance (p < 0.001). In a simulation scenario with medical students, FluoroSim had a significantly greater median absolute inaccuracy of 4.79mm compared to the testing scenario (p < 0.001). Conclusion. FluoroSim is a safe and inexpensive digital imaging adjunct to workshop bones simulation. To our knowledge this technology has not been explored in the context of DHS simulation, and has the potential to be extended to other orthopaedic procedures

The aim of this study was to establish any association between implant cut-out and a Tip Apex Distance (TAD), ≥25mm, in proximal femoral fractures, following closed reduction and stabilisation, with either a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or Intramedullary Hip Screw (IMHS) device. Furthermore, we investigated whether any difference in cut-out rate was related to fracture configuration or implant type. WE conducted a retrospective review of the full clinical records and radiographs of 65 consecutive patients, who underwent either DHS or IMHS fixation of proximal femoral fractures. The TAD was measured in the standard fashion using the combined measured AP and lateral radiograph distances. Fractures were classified according to the Muller AO classification. 35 patients underwent DHS fixation and 30 patients had IMHS fixation. 5 in each group had a TAD≥25mm. There were no cut-outs in the DHS group and 3 in the IMHS group. 2 of the cut-outs had a TAD≥25mm. The 3 cut-outs in the IMHS group had a fracture classification of 31-A2, 31-A3 and 32-A3.1 respectively. In addition, the fractures were inadequately reduced and fixed into a varus position. A TAD<25mm would appear to be associated with a lower rate of cut-out. The cut-out rate in the IMHS group was higher than the DHS group. Contributing factors may have included an unstable fracture configuration and inadequate closed fracture reduction at the time of surgery

Objectives: To compare the biomechanical properties of lag screw insertion in a laboratory model. Two blades, the Synthes Dynamic Helical Hip Screw (DHHS) and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), and two screws, the Synthes Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Stryker Gamma 3 lag screw, were compared. Setting: Orthopaedic biomechanics laboratory. Design: Insertion testing was carried out in high and low density polyurethane foam mounted and attached to a Zwick Roell Amsler Hydrowin. Outcome Measures: The axial load and torque during insertion of the implants was measured. Results: The force required to insert the DHHS and PFNA blades was greater than the DHS and Gamma 3 screws into both low and high density foam. The force required to insert the DHHS and PFNA blades into high density foam was greater than low density foam. The torque required to insert the DHHS and PFNA blades into high density foam was less than that to insert the DHS and Gamma 3 screws. The torque required to insert the DHS and Gamma 3 screws into low density foam was less than the DHHS and PFNA blades. The torque during insertion of the DHHS and PFNA blades seemed to be independent of foam density. Conclusions: The insertional properties of blades are significantly different to screws and this may have clinical importance

Introduction. Osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) is frequent injuries affecting elderly, osteoporotic patients leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Successful prognosis including union and alignment is challenging even though initial successful reduction with internal fixation. Although many factors are related to the patient's final prognosis. Well reduction with stable fracture fixation is still the goal of treatment to improve the quality of life and decrease morbidity in patients with hip fractures, but this in turn depends on the type of fracture and bone quality. Poor bone quality is responsible for common complications, such as failure of fixation, varus collapse and lag screw cut-out, in elderly patients. Kim et al. found that the complication rate when using conventional DHS in unstable ITFs can be as high as 50% because of screw cut-out. We used the dynamic hip screws (DHS) strengthened by calcium phosphate cement (CPC) for treatment femoral intertrochanteric fracture and review the prognosis of our patients. Materials and Methods. From January of 2011 to January of 2014, 42 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture underwent surgery with DHS strengthened by CPC. Comparisons were made between the DHS plus CPC group with the other patients with only DHS used in our department. All patients were followed up for an average time of 14.8(6 to 24) months. X-ray was reviewed for the conditions of union and implant failure. Results. In DHS group, fixation failure happened in 3 case, delayed union and coax varus deformity in 2 cases. IN DHS plus CPC group, all fractures healed uneventfully, there is no non-union or malunion in this group. There is only 1 fixation cut-out and 1 secondary lag screw sliding was noted, however, union was still well over fracture site in this case, the patient had no clinical symptoms. Discussion. Residual bony defects present after DHS fixation in intertrochanteric fracture may lead to postoperative complications, including nonunion or implant failure. DHS strengthened by CPC is reliable fixation for old patients with intertrochanteric fracture, We demonstrated that augmentation of the bony defect with dynamic hip screw by reinforced calcium phosphate cement significantly improved the strength of osteoporotic bone, prevent screw loosening, and promote early healing of fracture. The patients can be decreased the risk of refracture and allow early weight bearing, especially in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone

Aims: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) is a common implant used for extracapsular fracture neck of femur. Accurate placement of the guide wires for the DHS insertion is the most important surgical step. In order to improve precision and accuracy of the guide wire placement, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery System (CAOSS) was used , which was developed at the University of Hull. Methods: CAOSS helps in surgical planning and aid surgeons for accurate guide wire placement into femoral neck. After fracture reduction, intra-operative computer based surgical planning was performed using one fluoroscopic image in two planes each. A trajectory obtained thus helped surgeon to place a guide wire along with the required course under the computer guidance. Results: CAOSS system was used on 11 patients for guide wire placement. Intra-operative fluoroscopic images of all the patients showed accurate position of the guide wire both in AP and lateral planes. In theory only 4 fluoroscopic images are required during this surgical procedure in total. But in practice, more than 4 were required depending upon the experience of the radiographer. None of the patient had any intra-operative complication. Conclusions: The computer aided surgery was found to be safe, accurate and reliable for guide wire placement for dynamic hip screw insertion

Aims: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) is a common implant used for extracapsular fracture neck of femur. Accurate placement of the guide wires for the DHS insertion is the most important surgical step. In order to improve precision and accuracy of the guide wire placement, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery System (CAOSS) was used which was developed at the University of Hull. Early clinical experience in 14 cases is presented. Methods: CAOSS helps in surgical planning and aid surgeons for accurate guide wire placement into femoral neck. After fracture reduction, intraoperative computer based surgical planning was performed using one ßuoroscopic image in two planes each. A trajectory obtained thus helped surgeon to place a guide wire along with the required course under the computer guidance. Results: CAOSS system was used on 11 patients for guide wire placement. Intraoperative ßuoroscopic images of all the patients showed accurate position of the guide wire both in AP and lateral planes. Only 4 ßuoroscopic images were required during the surgical procedure in total, both pre and post guide wire insertion. Conclusions: The computer aided surgery used in guide wire placement for dynamic hip screw insertion proves to be accurate and reliable. It also reduces ionisation radiation exposure to the surgeon, patients and theatre personnel

Purpose: Numerous implants used in repairing a trochanteric fracture of the hip are currently available. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the complications and results of the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP), a relatively new device versus the conventional dynamic hip screw (DHS). Materials and Methods: Between 2001–2003, 110 consecutive patients with trochanteric fractures were treated in our department. Fifty-five fractures were stabilized using the PCCP and 55 fractures were treated with the DHS. Results were analyzed according to fracture pattern, type of implant, quality of fracture reduction and position of implant. Function was assessed on the basis of pain, walking aids and walking capability. Results: Forty-seven (85%) of 55 hips treated with PCCP healed without additional treatment and complications. Forty-three (78%) treated with DHS healed without additional treatment and complications. Complications among 8 patients (15%) of the PCCP group were: deep vein thrombosis, cardiac complication, chest infection and pressure sores. Complications among 12 patients (22%) of the DHS group were: implant failure (7%), deep wound infection, deep vein thrombosis and pressure sores. Conclusions: Use of the PCCP implant provides similar and occasionally better results compared to those obtained with the conventional DHS device. The most outstanding advantage of the PCCP device was no implant failure or implant cut out

It is widely accepted that a tip apex distance of greater than 25mm is associated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) failure and cut-out. The aim was to devise an accurate and easy method for calculation of DHS tip apex distance (TAD) from intraoperative imaging using the tools available on Kodac Picture Archiving and Communications System. This method was applied to all patients treated with a DHS for intertrochanteric hip fracture during a six month period. Any subsequent radiographs were assessed for evidence of failure within 18 months. The TAD was calculated using a modification of a previously described method using a similar imaging system (Johnston et al, Injury 2008) which has been shown to be accurate and reproducible. Scaling was based on the 12.5mm thread diameter of all Synthes (Switzerland) DHS screws. 60 patients underwent a DHS during the study. Nine patients were excluded who had an additional method of fixation or an intracapsular fracture. Four patients had insufficient xrays for analysis. Data was gathered for 47 patients and showed a mean TAD of 17mm (range 8.2–30.6mm). Three patients had a TAD greater than 25mm. 22 patients had a post-operative xray within 18 months. There were two cut-outs identified and both were from patients with a TAD of greater than 25mm (25.7 and 30.6mm). No incidences of implant failure or complications were identified for patients with acceptable TADs. 93.6% of screws were therefore inserted satisfactorily. Two out of the three patients with a TAD greater than 25mm had xray evidence of screw cut-out. This study supports previous evidence that a DHS lag screw should be positioned with a TAD within 25mm and a distance greater than this is associated with screw cut-out. TAD can be easily calculated using intraoperative xrays and scaled using the screw itself

Introduction: Decreasing the length of the side plate of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) would theoretically allow a smaller surgical incision, a shorter surgical time, decreased operative blood loss and minimal periosteal stripping. A new design of a very short plate (VSP) dynamic hip screw based on two diagonal screws has been developed. The new design was compared with the four hole side plate regarding its mechanical properties and bio-mechanical outcomes. Methods: Four pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric femora were extracted from male corpses aged 25–43 (mean 34.8), mechanical loading was applied to four pairs of cadaveric femora which were fixated using the new system on one side and the conventional design on the other. The decline during the periodical loading and the breakage load of the fixated bones were measured. In addition, mechanical performance and probability for failure was assessed by conducting a mathematical analysis using the finite element method. Results: The average deflection under excessive cyclic loading was 33% higher in bones with the VSP-DHS device than those with regular DHS. The average load failure during the collapse loading test was 312 kg for the VSP-DHS compared to 416 kg for the regular device. The mathematical analysis performed indicated that the maximal stress in the VSP-DHS reached values 3–4 fold higher than in the regular DHS. Conclusions: Bio-mechanical evaluation was performed both by mechanical testing and theoretically. Although the new design offers a minimally invasive approach to subtrochanteric femur fracture fixation, it was found to have insufficient biomechanical performance resulting in high probability for mechanical failure

Introduction: While recent guidelines for the treatment of such fractures do not recommend load-bearing devices, there is little evidence actually condemning them, and there is still a lack of literature on the reconstruction nails now generally used. Aim: To evaluate the clinical outcome of pathological (metastatic) proximal femoral fractures treated by either a long Gamma nail, an AO nail with a spiral blade plate (AO-SBP), or a dynamic hip screw (DHS). Method: Eighty-six operations in 80 patients with average age 63.9 years were followed for 18 months or until death. Thirty-one procedures were prophylactic. Results: Thirty Gamma nails (three bilateral), 28 AO SBP rods (three bilateral) and 28 DHS were implanted. The DHS had complications in 10 cases (35%), all occurred in less than 14 months; three implants fractured, four cut out, and three failed to relieve symptoms. The Gamma nail group had two (7%) complications, both after 20 months; one nail fractured and the other lost fixation. The AO-SBP group had two (7%) complications, with one SBP misplacement, and one postoperative death after bilateral nailing. Pain relief and function were greatly improved by the nailing procedures in 57 out of 58 cases. Survival averaged 5.5 months, and was related to primary disease, and presence of visceral metastases. Conclusion: Both the long Gamma and AO- SBP nails reliably treated metastatic proximal femoral fractures, but loss of fixation occurred with long-term survival. The DHS had a high complication rate when used in these cases, and we do not recommend its use

Introduction: The use of intramedullary nailing (IMHS) has increased at the expense of the dynamic hip screw (DHS), although the outcome is not different in the studies of pertrochanteric fractures (PTF), known as AO/OTA type 31A1-2 fractures with a preoperative intact lateral femoral wall. We therefore investigated the two implants in the subgroup of PTF with a fractured greater trochanter. Materials and Methods: Six hundred thirty-five consecutive patients with PTF fixated by a short IMHS or by a DHS mounted on a four hole lateral plate were prospectively included between 2002 and 2008. The fractures were preoperatively classified according to AO/OTA classification system, including status of the greater and lesser trochanter. The integrity of the lateral femoral wall, fracture reduction and implant positioning were assessed postoperatively. Reoperations due to technical failures were recorded for one year. Results: Among the 311 patients sustaining a PTF with a fractured greater trochanter, 4% (6/158) operated with an IMHS were reoperated compared to 14% (22/153) with a DHS (p=0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis combining demographic and biomechanical parameters showed the IMHS to have a lower rate of reoperation (p=0.002). During the operative procedure, the lateral femoral wall was fractured in 6% (9/158) of patients, in which an IMHS was performed versus 28% (42/153) operated with a DHS (p< 0.001). Among the DHS, a fractured lateral femoral wall was confirmed to be a predictor of a reoperation (31% (13/42) of patients with a fractured lateral femoral wall versus 8% (9/111) with an intact lateral femoral wall, p< 0.001). As in other studies, the different reoperation rate would have been overseen in the main group of AO/ OTA type 31A1-2 PTF fractures (4% (6/164) IMHS versus 6% (30/471) DHS, p=0.196). Conclusion: The IMHS seems to have a lower reoperation rate than the DHS in the subgroup of PTF with a fractured greater trochanter. In contrast to the DHS, the IMHS presumably keeps the integrity of the lateral femoral wall. In future studies, PTF should be divided into subgroups

Purpose: To compare failure rates, and patient functional outcomes, using the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Medoff Sliding Plate (MSP) for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. Method: One hundred and sixty three consecutive patients with unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures, from three hospitals, were prospectively randomized to DHS or MSP. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to focus on isolated unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in ambulatory patients over age 60, without previous hip fractures or significant subtrochanteric extension. Patients were stratified by mental status and treating hospital. Randomization was performed intra operatively, after placement of a 135 degree guide wire. Follow up assessments were performed at regular intervals for a minimum of six months. The primary outcome was re-operation rate. The secondary outcome was patient function, using a validated outcome measure, the Hip Fracture Functional Recovery Score. Tertiary outcomes included: mortality, hospital stay, quality of reduction and mal union rate. Results: 86 patients were randomized to DHS and 76 to MSP. The groups had similar patient demographics and pre fracture status (medical and functional). The patients had similar hospital course except there were more transfusions in the MSP group (2 vs. 1 unit). The quality of reduction was the same for each group but the operative time was longer in the MSP group (61 vs. 50 min). The rate of re-operation was low (3/86 in DHS and 2/76 in MSP) with no statistically significant difference. The indication for re-operation differed for the two groups as all three failures in the DHS group were related to screw cut out and both failures in the MSP arm were because of non union. The functional outcomes were the same for both groups with functional recovery scores at six months of 51% in the DHS arm and 49% in the MSP arm. Conclusion: The two techniques produced similar results for the clinically important outcomes of the need for further surgery and functional status of the patients. For this challenging sub group of hip fractures, based on the equivalent results in this study either implant is a reasonable choice

Introduction: Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation is one of the most common orthopaedic surgical procedures. Tip Apex Distance (TAD) is a well recognised method of evaluating the screw position of the DHS. We studied the adequacy of fixation of DHS by assessing TAD and type of reduction. Materials and Methods: We selected a random cohort of 102 patients who had DHS fixation and had the requisite clinico-radiologic data. TAD is defined as sum of the distance, in millimeteres, from the tip of the lag screw to the apex of femoral head, as measured on AP radiograph and Lateral radiograph, after correction has been made for radiological magnification. Tip apex distance of 25 mm or less is considered as good, 26–30mm as acceptable, 31–35mm as poor and more than 35mm as unacceptable. Quality of reduction was assessed as per Sernbo. Good, if alignment was normal on AP and maximum 20 degrees angulation on lateral radiograph and less than 4mm of displacment of any fragment. To be labelled acceptable, a reduction had to meed the criteria of a good reduction with respect to either alignement or displacement, but not both. A poor reduction met neither. Results: Mean TAD in our series was 24mm. (9.84 – 37.6). Our of this 58.82% were 25mm or less indicating good, 25.49% of them were 26–30mm indicating acceptable, 8.82% were 30–35mm indicating poor and 6.8% were more than 35mm indicating unacceptable. 39.21% patients had good reduction. 43.13% had acceptable reduction and 17.64% had poor reduction. Conclusion: This study shows that only 58.82% of all patients having DHS fixation had good placement of the fixation device and only 39.21% had a good reduction. We conclude that complacency must not set in on DHS fixation and that we must endeavour for good reduction and placement in as many cases as possible

Although dynamic hip screw (DHS) is considered the treatment of choice for pertrochanteric fractures, we theorized that external fixation would produce clinical outcomes equal to, if not better than, outcomes obtained with conventional treatment. As external fixation is minimally-invasive, we expected a lower rate of morbidity and a reduced need for blood transfusions. We compared fixation with DHS vs. Orthofix pertrochanteric fixator (OPF) in elderly pertrochanteric fracture patients. Forty consecutive pertrochanteric fracture patients were randomized to receive either 135A1 4-hole DHS (Group A) or OPF with 4 HA-coated pins (Group B). Inclusion criteria were: female, age B3 65 years, AO type A1 or A2 and BMD less than −2.5 T score. There were no differences in patient age, fracture type, BMD, ASA, hospital stay or quality of reduction. Operative time was 64 B1 6 minutes in Group A and 34 B1 5 minutes in Group B (p < 0.005). Average number of post-operative blood transfusions was 2.0 B1 0.1 in Group A, and none in Group B (p < 0.0001). Pain was measured 5 days post-operatively and was lower in Group B (p < 0.005). Fracture varization at 6 months was 6 B1 8A1 in Group A and 2 B1 1A1 in Group B (p = 0.002). In Group B, no pin-tract infections occurred. Pin fixation improved over time, as shown by pin extraction torque (2770 B1 1710 N/mm) greater than insertion torque (1967 B1 1254 N/mm), (p= 0.001). Harris hip score at 2 years was 62 B1 20 in Group A and 63 B1 17 in Group B. This study shows that OPF with HA-coated pins is an effective treatment for this patient population. Operative time is brief, blood loss is minimal, fixation is adequate and the reduction is maintained over time

Purpose of the study: Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) is a new method for minimally invasive fixation of intratrochanteric fractures. Fixation is achieved with two neck screws and a 3-hole plate. This prospective study of a non-randomized series was designed to compare results in a monocentric cohort of patients treated by PCCP or dynamic hip screw (DHS). Material and methods: From September 2003 to December 2004, all patients presenting an A1 (75.8%) or A1 (24.2%) (AO classification) intratrochanteric fracture were treated with PCCP (n=37) or DHS (n=20). Female gender predominated (86.5%) in this elderly population, mean age 83.2 years. The following variables were studied: operative time, radiation time, blood loss, hemoglobin level, blood transfusion, bone healing, complications, quality of the reduction. Results: Mean follow-up was 8.3 months. The two groups were similar regarding bone healing, functional outcome and mortality. Intraoperative blood loss was less with PCCP (63 ml) than with DHS (120 ml). Mean fall in hemoglobin level was 2 after PCCP and 3 after DHS. The transfusion rate was 28% for PCCP and 40% for DHS. Mean operative time was 50 for PCCP and 30 minutes for DHS. Men radiation exposure was 4 minutes for PCCP and 1 minute for DHS. The positions of the screw (DHS) and the two PCCP screws were considered good for 68% of the PCCP and 75% of the DHS, acceptable for 29% PCCP and 20% DHS, and poor for 3% PCCP and 5% DHS. Complications were similar (one disassembly in each group). Discussion: Although this was a preliminary study, PCCP was found to provide an attractive alternative for the treatment of intratrochanteric fractures. Results are similar to those obtained with the DHS but with a less aggressive method (limited approach, less blood loss). A learning curve (at least 10 implantations) appears indispensable to achieve maximum skill. The main drawback is the duration of the radiation. This implant would not be acceptable for subtrochanteric fractures which would require another type of implant

We compared the outcome of patients treated for an intertrochanteric fracture of the femoral neck with a locked, long intramedullary nail with those treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS) in a prospective randomised study. Each patient who presented with an extra-capsular hip fracture was randomised to operative stabilisation with either a long intramedullary Holland nail or a DHS. We treated 92 patients with a Holland nail and 98 with a DHS. Pre-operative variables included the Mini Mental test score, patient mobility, fracture pattern and American Society of Anesthesiologists grading. Peri-operative variables were anaesthetic time, operating time, radiation time and blood loss. Post-operative variables were time to mobilising with a frame, wound infection, time to discharge, time to fracture union, and mortality. We found no significant difference in the pre-operative variables. The mean anaesthetic and operation times were shorter in the DHS group than in the Holland nail group (29.7 vs 40.4 minutes, p < 0.001; and 40.3 vs 54 minutes, p < 0.001, respectively). There was an increased mean blood loss within the DHS group versus the Holland nail group (160 ml vs 78 ml, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean time to mobilisation with a frame was shorter in the Holland nail group (DHS 4.3 days, Holland nail 3.6 days, p = 0.012). More patients needed a post-operative blood transfusion in the DHS group (23 vs seven, p = 0.003) and the mean radiation time was shorter in this group (DHS 0.9 minutes vs Holland nail 1.56 minutes, p < 0.001). The screw of the DHS cut out in two patients, one of whom underwent revision to a Holland nail. There were no revisions in the Holland nail group. All fractures in both groups were united when followed up after one year. We conclude that the DHS can be implanted more quickly and with less exposure to radiation than the Holland nail. However, the resultant blood loss and need for transfusion is greater. The Holland nail allows patients to mobilise faster and to a greater extent. We have therefore adopted the Holland nail as our preferred method of treating intertrochanteric fractures of the hip

The incidence of comminuted proximal femur fractures is increasing, due to the growing proportion of elderly people in the general population. Severely depleted cancellous bone in the femoral head and neck prevent stable proximal purchase, mandatory for intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Osteoporotic bones are associated with high implant failure rates, evidenced by cutout and upward screw penetration of the hip joint. A new method for femoral head fixation is described. The peg consists of a distal end that can expand in diameter from 7.8mm to 10.5mm by using pressurized saline, allowing good abutment into the femoral head. The peg may be connected to a side plate or an intramedullary device for inter or subtrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: Ten femoral heads were retrieved from patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty due to subcapital fracture. The heads were covered with a transparent epoxy resin until full solidification was obtained. An 8mm drill-hole was used to drill from the distal femoral neck along the femoral head axis, not penetrating the subchondral bone and cartilage. Afterwards, 1.4mm drill was used to penetrate the cartilage and subchondral bone of the femoral head for insertion of a pressure gage. Intraosseous pressure measurements were then recorded. The peri-prosthetic bone density was evaluated by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) and Microradiography Computer Analysis in two stages: 1) with the peg unexpanded, and 2) with the peg expanded. In addition, Instron 8871 tested axial load, pullout and rotatory strengths of the peg. Results: Increased periprosthetic bone density following peg expansion was demonstrated on DEXA and microradiography with no increase in the intraosseous pressure. The friction coefficient of the bone implant interface, calculated by axial load measurements, was less than the coefficient of steel to steel. Pullout and rotatory strengths were as good as those reported for the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS). Conclusions: Bone stock preservation due to compression of the depleted cancellous bone (rather than removed bone by drilling) may improve the mechanical properties of the periprosthetic bone and the stability of the fixation. Due to the strong abutment of the peg, hardware failure, mainly bone cutout can be reduced. Due to its lower friction coefficient, the hip peg will begin to slide following axial load through the plate or the intramedullary device, rather than penetrating the femoral head. Preliminary positive results indicate that this new method may be suitable for inter or subtrochanteric femoral fracture fixation

Introduction and aim. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of femoral head remains a major post-operative complication of the surgical fixation of femoral neck fractures (#NOF). In order to reduce the incidence of AVN following this type of fracture, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has stated that fixation must occur within 6 hours. However, there is a paucity of information concerning whether time to fixation influences the development of AVN. The aim of the present study was to assess whether time to fixation affects the development of AVN in patients aged under 60 who had sustained a fracture (#)NOF. Methods. We looked retrospectively at 101 patients (61 female, 40 male aged under 60 (mean age 47 years) who were admitted to a multi-tertiary centre having sustained an intracapsular #NOF. The underlying co morbidity of the patient sample was varied, as was the mechanism of trauma, though in the majority of cases the cause was a simple fall. The time delay (TD) between the time of injury and the time of operation for each patient was determined. Results. 72 patients sustained an intracapsular displaced fracture and 29 an intracapsular undisplaced fracture. Of these, 33 patients were treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS), 10 received a DHS plus a cannulated screw, and 54 were treated with cannulated screws only. We looked at time to fixation(TD) as follows: Group A-less than 6 hours (7 patients), Group B-6 to 12 hours (16 patients), Group C-12 to 18 hours (15 patients), Group D-18 to 24 hours (18 patients), Group E −24 to 48 hours (26 patients) and Group F- more than 48 hours(15 patients). Out of 97 patients, 15 (15.46%) developed AVN. Of these, 13 were patients who had sustained an intracapsular displaced fracture, two had sustained an undisplaced fracture. Of the intracapsular displaced fractures patients, the time to fixation varied from 3 hours to 26 hours post-trauma. Of note, twelve of these patients received a cannulated screw and only one was treated with a DHS. The two patients with an undisplaced intracapsular fracture underwent fixation at 13 and 24 hours respectively. The method of fixation was a cannulated screw. Conclusion. Current NICE guidelines state that intracapsular #NOF must be fixed within 6 hours in order to prevent AVN of femoral head. In our sample, 15.46% of patients developed AVN post-fixation. Crucially, 2 patients out of the 7 patients (28.57%) developed AVN despite undergoing fixation within 6 hours. Interestingly, we have observed that fracture fixation with a cannulated screw has a greater propensity to develop AVN despite time to fixation, since 15.46% of patients treated in this manner developed AVN. Taken together, method of fixation rather than time to fixation appears to be a key factor in the incidence of AVN in our patient group

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse mechanical failures involving dismonted osteosynthesis materials implanted to fix pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures with a dynamic hip screw (DHS), a Gamma nail, or a plate nail system (STACA). Material and methods: Our cohort included 16 patients among a series of 350 patients who had been treated with 240 DHS, 80 Staca nailplates, and 30 Gamma nails between 1996 and 1999. We used the Ender classification for the x-ray analysis and the Cuny criteria which describe the most common causes of dismounted material. Results: According to the defined criteria, 70/350 osteosynthesis assemblies (20%) were considered insufficient on the immediate postoperative x-rays and eventually dismounted in 16 patients. Two of these patients had major osteopaenia according to the Singh criteria and ten underwent revision because of poor clinical tolerance. These patients had six DHS (3 “swinging” cervical nails, two dismounted plates, and one screw protruding into the joint space). A protruding screw was the problem for the eight Staca nail-plates. Two Gamma nails had a “swinging” screw. These cases of dismounted material were predominantly observed in patients with Ender grade 5, 7 and 8 pertrochanteric fractures. Discussion: Our analysis of these cases revealed several important factors: 1) the quality of the fracture reduction with restitution of the medial pillar of the per-trochanteric mass; 2) central anchoring in the femoral head essential for stable fixation; 3) superior stability of the DHS in grade 1 and 6 fractures due to the greater projected surface improving hold in cancellous bone. Inversely, for subtrochanteric fractures (grade 7 and 8), centromedulary shaft anchoring with a Gamma nail reduces mechanical stress in varus and thus the risk of “swinging” screws. Finally, the monoblock construct of the Staca nail-plate, which does not have the dynamic potential of the DHS and the Gamma nail, raises a risk of protrusion, particularly in case of “internal rotation” fractures with major metaphyseal comminution (grades 4 and 5). This latter type of fixation is however very effective for simple pertrochanteric fractures with minimal comminution (grades 1 to 3). Conclusion: Material dismounting results from a series of factors related both to the material used and to the operative technique. We thus reserve the Staca nail-plate for grade 1 to 3 fractures in the Ender classification, the DHS for grades 1 to 6 and the nail-screw fixation for subtrochanteric (grade 7 and 8) fractures

Background: To determine patients clinical and haematological characteristics that could affect the use of blood and infection incidence with hip fractures (HF) treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS). Patients and Methods: A retrospective study of all the HF patients during 5 years (January1995- December1999) who were treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS ïf’, Synthes-Stratec, Oberdof, Switzerland) at one unique university hospital. No patient was excluded. Age, gender, elapsed time, anaesthesia risk (ASA clasification), type of HF (internationalAO classification), transfusion procedure and the total used; haemoglobin (Hb) at days 0 (incoming to urgency service) and first postoperative (POD ï€1) were examined. We also analyzed the infection incidence (CDC criteria), place and severity. The statistical univariate analysis included Student’s t-test for numeric variables and Pearson’s chi-squared test for string variables. There was considered to be a statistically significant difference (SSD) when p< 0.05. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression model was used. Results: Three hundred and one patients with HF were studied. 125 A1 and 176 A2, according to the AO classification. Male/female ratio: 76/225 (25.2%/74.8%); age 78.97 years old (range: 23–104); ASA: I 53 (17.6%); II 97 (32.2%); III 138 (45.8%) and IV 13 (4.3%). Hb Values on the day of admission: 128.7 g/L (range: 81.7–176.7) and POD ï€1: 101 g/L (range: 54.7–150.7). 186 (61.8%) patients were transfused with an average 1.42 red cell concentrate (range: 0–6). 89 (29.6%) had an infection diagnosis: 79 (26.2%) urinary tract infection (UTI), 7 (2.3%) pneumonia and 8 (2.7%) superficial wound. 18 (6%) died in the first month. At univariant study of transfusion act, the transfused patients were older (p< 0.001), suffered more infections (p:0.019), more UTI (p:0.003), had lower Hb day 0 (p< 0.001) and POD ï€1(p< 0.001). When analyze the infection, the patients were older (p< 0.001), had higher ASA (p:0.019), lower Hb at day0 (p< 0.026), longer stay (p< 0.001), were more transfused (p:0.019), and received more transfusions (p:0.004). The logistic regression analysis identified only the type of HF, the age and the Hb level (p< 0.05) as independent predictors of transfusion. Comments: In patients with HF the Hb is the most important predictor of blood transfusion, and it is associated with a higher rate of post surgical infection and longer hospital stays. These complications may be explained by the possible inmunomodulation effect of allogenic blood transfusion

Because of the decreased holding power of the screws, fixation of osteoporotic fractures has a high failure rate (10%–25%). It should also be reported that even if fixation does not fail, several osteoporotic patients with fractures have unsatisfactory functional results due to bony malunion. Elderly patients with osteoporosis demand better fixation techniques. Treatment goals in this particular patient population include: proper fracture alignment, stable fixation and early rehabilitation. A surgeon should adopt a minimally-invasive technique in order to relieve the patient of physiological stress and allow for full-weight bearing of the fractured limb. Several fixation augmentation techniques have been proposed such as the use of PMMA, calcium phosphate cement, oblique screw insertion and cannulated ported screws. Our studies indicated that osteoporotic bone fixation can be greatly improved by using implants coated with calcium phosphates such as hydroxyapatite. Hip fractures are the most severe form of fracture in patients with osteoporosis. Cut-out of the load-bearing implant is seen more frequently compared to patients with good bone quality often leading to revision surgery. We compared dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation with hydroxyapatite(HA)-coated AO/ASIF screws to DHS fixation with standard AO/ASIF screws in osteoporotic trochanteric fractures. One-hundred-andtwenty patients were divided into two groups and randomized to receive 135° 4-hole DHS with either standard lag and cortical AO/ASIF screws (Group A) or HA-coated lag and cortical AO/ASIF screws (Group B). Inclusion criteria were: female, age > 65 years, AO/OTA fracture type A1 or A2 and a bone mass density (BMD) T-score lower than −2.5. Exclusion criteria included lag screw extension into the proximal third of the femoral head. Between the two groups, there were no differences in patient age, BMD, screw position in the femoral head, tip apex distance, quality of reduction and fracture impaction at the 6-month follow-up. In Group A, femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA) reduced over time (134 ± 5° postoperative vs. 126 ± 12° at 6 months, p = 0.003), whereas in Group B, no reduction occurred over time, as indicated by the lack of difference between the FNSA post-operative (134 ± 7°) and at 6 months (133 ± 7°). Lag screw cut-out occurred in four Group A cases but not in Group B (p < 0.05, = 0.8). Three patients with cases of cut-out underwent revision with bipolar prostheses. At 6 months, the Harris hip score was 60 ± 25 (Group A) and 71 ± 18 (Group B) (p= 0.007). External fixation could be a viable treatment option in elderly trochanteric fracture patients since it typically involves a low energy trauma. However post-operative complications associated with inadequate pin fixation have limited its use. Because of the development of HA-coated screws, we compared external fixation with HA-coated screws (H-CP) to DHS with AO/ASIF stainless-steel screws in osteoporotic trochanteric fractures. Forty patients were divided into two groups and randomized for treatment with either 135° 4-hole DHS (Group A) or external fixation with 4 H-CP (Group B). Inclusion criteria were: female, age > 65 years, AO/OTA fracture type A1–2 and a BMD T-score lower than −2.5. All fixators were removed at 3 months. There were no differences in patient age, fracture type, BMD, ASA, hospital stay and quality of reduction. Average number of blood transfusions was 2 ± 0.1 in Group A, whereas no blood transfusions were required in Group B (p < 0.005). Post-operative FNSA was 134 ± 6 ° in Group A and 132 ± 4° in Group B (ns). In Group A, the varus collapse of the fracture at 6 months was 6 ± 8° and in Group B 2 ± 1° (p = 0.002). The Harris hip score was 62 ± 20 in Group A and 63 ± 17 in Group B (ns). In Group B, no screw infection occurred. Conclusion: A valuable strategy that will benefit the elderly osteoporotic patient and provide for early mobilization is the use of a minimally-invasive technique, a well-restored anatomy of the fractured limb, no blood transfusion requirements and early rehabilitation. These should also be beneficial for maintaining the overall well-being of the patient. Our results demonstrate that enhanced screw osteointegration and fracture fixation will have a positive impact on the quality of life in the elderly osteoporotic patient

Digital radiographs are routinely used for preoperative planning, both in trauma and elective patients; particularly in preoperative templating for total hip replacement. Traditional wisdom holds that radiographs are oversized, though the degree to which this occurs is unclear. Although digital templating systems offer the use of calibration markers, this option is not always availed. We aimed to ascertain the typical magnification in departmental xrays of the hip, both to determine the typical degree of magnification as well as ascertain its consistency. All patients undergoing dynamic hip screw fixation (DHS) in our unit over the past 12 months were identified. Using the PACS system, subsequent xrays of the patient with the implant in situ were identified; both anteroposterior abdominal and pelvic films were used. The width of a standard DHS screw (12.5 mm) was compared with the width measured on the xrays to determine a magnification factor. 164 patients were identified, of these 39 had undergone DHS fixation with subsequent xrays. 3 films were focused on the abdomen but provided good coverage of the hip also. 2 xrays were excluded – both due to limited quality. The average magnification was 26.4% (range 15.5%–42%). There was limited consistency between images. Radiographs are a core investigation in the assessment of the orthopaedic patient. The advent of picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) has allowed the enterprising surgeon to pre-emptively plan their surgical technique and implant use. However, the utility of non-calibrated images in planning implant size is limited by variation in magnification. Surgeons should be cautious in using such images to guide their implant usage

Aims

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the preferred treatment for displaced proximal femoral neck fractures. However, in many countries this option is economically unviable. To improve outcomes in financially disadvantaged populations, we studied the technique of concomitant valgus hip osteotomy and operative fixation (VOOF). This prospective serial study compares two treatment groups: VOOF versus operative fixation alone with cannulated compression screws (CCSs).

Aims

In this study, we aimed to explore surgical variations in the Femoral Neck System (FNS) used for stable fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Aims

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, incidence of hip fracture has not changed. Evidence has shown increased mortality rates associated with COVID-19 infection. However, little is known about the outcomes of COVID-19 negative patients in a pandemic environment. In addition, the impact of vitamin D levels on mortality in COVID-19 hip fracture patients has yet to be determined.

Aims

We aim to objectively assess the impact of COVID-19 on mean total operative cases for all indicative procedures (as outlined by the Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST)) experienced by orthopaedic trainees in the deanery of the Republic of Ireland. Subjective experiences were reported for each trainee using questionnaires.

Aims

Our rural orthopaedic service has undergone service restructure during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to sustain hip fracture care. All adult trauma care has been centralised to the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital for assessment and medical input, before transferring those requiring operative intervention to the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital. We aim to review the impact of COVID-19 on hip fracture workload and service changes upon management of hip fractures.

Aims

Cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are commonly used for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be used as a salvage procedure when fixation fails in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications of THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyze drain fluid, blood, and urine simultaneously to follow the long-term release of vancomycin from a biphasic ceramic carrier in major hip surgery. Our hypothesis was that there would be high local vancomycin concentrations during the first week with safe low systemic trough levels and a complete antibiotic release during the first month.

We treated 108 patients with a pertrochanteric femoral fracture using either the dynamic hip screw or the proximal femoral nail in this prospective, randomised series. We compared walking ability before fracture, intra-operative variables and return to their residence. Patients treated with the proximal femoral nail (n = 42) had regained their pre-operative walking ability significantly (p = 0.04) more often by the four-month review than those treated with the dynamic hip screw (n = 41). Peri-operative or immediate post-operative measures of outcome did not differ between the groups, with the exception of operation time. The dynamic hip screw allowed a significantly greater compression of the fracture during the four-month follow-up, but consolidation of the fracture was comparable between the two groups. Two major losses of reduction were observed in each group, resulting in a total of four revision operations.

Our results suggest that the use of the proximal femoral nail may allow a faster postoperative restoration of walking ability, when compared with the dynamic hip screw.

Aims

We reviewed all patients who sustained a fracture of the hip and were treated in Northern Ireland over a period of 15 years to identify trends in incidence, the demographics of the patients, the rates of mortality, the configuration of the fracture and the choice of implant.

Objectives

Fractures of the proximal femur are a common clinical problem, and a number of orthopaedic devices are available for the treatment of such fractures. The objective of this study was to assess the rotational stability, a common failure predictor, of three different rotational control design philosophies: a screw, a helical blade and a deployable crucifix.

Introduction

The objective of this study was to determine if a synthetic bone substitute would provide results similar to bone from osteoporotic femoral heads during in vitro testing with orthopaedic implants. If the synthetic material could produce results similar to those of the osteoporotic bone, it could reduce or eliminate the need for testing of implants on bone.

We investigated the clinical outcome of internal fixation for pathological fracture of the femur after primary excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma that had been treated with adjuvant radiotherapy.

A review of our database identified 22 radiation-induced fractures of the femur in 22 patients (seven men, 15 women). We noted the mechanism of injury, fracture pattern and any complications after internal fixation, including nonunion, hardware failure, secondary fracture or deep infection.

The mean age of the patients at primary excision of the tumour was 58.3 years (39 to 86). The mean time from primary excision to fracture was 73.2 months (2 to 195). The mean follow-up after fracture fixation was 65.9 months (12 to 205). Complications occurred in 19 patients (86%). Nonunion developed in 18 patients (82%), of whom 11 had a radiological nonunion at 12 months, five a nonunion and hardware failure and two an infected nonunion. One patient developed a second radiation-associated fracture of the femur after internal fixation and union of the initial fracture. A total of 13 patients (59%) underwent 24 revision operations.

Internal fixation of a pathological fracture of the femur after radiotherapy for a soft-tissue sarcoma has an extremely high rate of complication and requires specialist attention.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1144–8.

The February 2013 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: the risk of ankle fractures; absorbable implants; minimally invasive heel fracture fixation; pertrochanteric fractures; arthroplasty and intracapsular hip fractures; and extensor mechanism disruption.

An MR scan was performed on all patients who presented to our hospital with a clinical diagnosis of a fracture of the proximal femur, but who had no abnormality on plain radiographs. This was a prospective study of 102 consecutive patients over a ten-year period. There were 98 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria, of whom 75 were scanned within 48 hours of admission, with an overall mean time between admission and scanning of 2.4 days (0 to 10). A total of 81 patients (83%) had abnormalities detected on MRI; 23 (23%) required operative management.

The use of MRI led to the early diagnosis and treatment of occult hip pathology. We recommend that incomplete intertrochanteric fractures are managed non-operatively with protected weight-bearing. The study illustrates the high incidence of fractures which are not apparent on plain radiographs, and shows that MRI is useful when diagnosing other pathology such as malignancy, which may not be apparent on plain films.

The aim of this study was to examine the rates and potential risk factors for 28-day re-admission following a fracture of the hip at a high-volume tertiary care hospital. We retrospectively reviewed 467 consecutive patients with a fracture of the hip treated in the course of one year. Causes and risk factors for unplanned 28-day re-admissions were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis, including the difference in one-year mortality. A total of 55 patients (11.8%) were re-admitted within 28 days of discharge. The most common causes were pneumonia in 15 patients (27.3%), dehydration and renal dysfunction in ten (18.2%) and deteriorating mobility in ten (18.2%). A moderate correlation was found between chest infection during the initial admission and subsequent re-admission with pneumonia (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). A significantly higher mortality rate at one year was seen in the re-admission group (41.8% (23 of 55) vs 18.7% (77 of 412), p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified advancing age, admission source, and the comorbidities of diabetes and neurological disorders as the strongest predictors for re-admission. Early re-admission following hip fracture surgery is predominantly due to medical causes and is associated with higher one-year mortality. The risk factors for re-admission can have implications for performance-based pay initiatives in the NHS. Multidisciplinary management in reducing post-operative active clinical problems may reduce early re-admission.

Incomplete intertrochanteric fractures do not extend across to the medial femoral cortex and are stable, without rotational deformity or shortening of the lower limb. The aim of our study was to establish whether they can be successfully managed conservatively. A total of 68 patients over a five-year period presented with a suspected fracture of the femoral neck and underwent an MRI scan for further assessment. From these, we retrospectively reviewed eight patients with normal plain radiographs but with an incomplete, intertrochanteric fracture on MRI scan. Five were managed conservatively and three operatively.

The mean length of hospital stay was 16 days for the conservatively-treated group and 15 days for those who underwent surgery; this was not statistically significant (p > 0.5) and all patients were mobilised on discharge. Although five patients were readmitted at a mean of 3.2 years after discharge, none had progressed to a complete fracture. We believe that patients with incomplete intertrochanteric fractures should be considered for conservative treatment.

Endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of 31 tumours of the proximal femur in 30 patients was performed using a Wagner SL femoral revision stem. The mean follow-up was 25.6 months (0.6 to 130.0). Of the 28 patients with a metastasis, 27 died within a mean follow-up period of 18.1 months (0.6 to 56.3) after the operation, and the remaining patient was excluded from the study 44.4 months post-operatively when the stem was removed. The two patients with primary bone tumours were still alive at the latest follow-up of 81.0 and 130.0 months, respectively. One stem only was removed for suspected low-grade infection 44.4 months post-operatively. The worst-case survival rate with removal of the stem for any cause and/or loss to follow-up was 80.0% (95% confidence interval 44.9 to 100) at 130.0 months. The mean Karnofsky index increased from 44.2% (20% to 70%) pre-operatively to 59.7% (0% to 100%) post-operatively, and the mean Merle d’Aubigné score improved from 4.5 (0 to 15) to 12.0 (0 to 18). The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 62.4% (3.3% to 100%).

The Wagner SL femoral revision stem offers an alternative to special tumour prostheses for the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the proximal femur. The mid-term results are very promising, but long-term experience is necessary.

We undertook a trial on 60 patients with AO 31A2 fractures of the hip who were randomised after stabilisation of the fracture into two equal groups, one of which received post-operative treatment using a non-invasive interactive neurostimulation device and the other with a sham device. All other aspects of their rehabilitation were the same. The treatment was continued for ten days after operation.

Outcome measurements included the use of a visual analogue scale for pain, the brief pain inventory and Ketorolac for post-operative control of pain, and an overall assessment of outcome by the surgeon. There were significantly better results for the patients receiving treatment by active electrical stimulation (repeated measures analysis of variance, p < 0.001). The findings of this pilot trial justify a larger study to determine if these results are more generally applicable.

We report positive and negative factors associated with the most commonly-used methods of reconstruction after pathological fracture of the proximal femur. The study was based on 142 patients treated surgically for 146 metastatic lesions between 1996 and 2003. The local rate of failure was 10.3% (15 of 146). Of 37 operations involving osteosynthetic devices, six failed (16.2%) compared with nine (8.3%) in 109 operations involving endoprostheses. Of nine cases of prosthetic failure, four were due to periprosthetic fractures and three to recurrent dislocation. In the osteosynthesis group, three (13.6%) of 22 reconstruction nails failed. The two-year risk of re-operation after any type of osteosynthesis was 0.35 compared with 0.18 after any type of endoprosthetic reconstruction (p = 0.07). Endoprosthetic reconstructions are preferable to the use of reconstruction nails and other osteosynthetic devices for the treatment of metastatic lesions in the proximal third of the femur.