Barriers to the adoption of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by new consultants could be explained by its higher revision rate, to which mal-positioned components contribute. The aim of this study was to determine whether robotic technology enables inexperienced surgeons to perform accurate UKAs when compared to current conventional methods After randomisation, sixteen trainees who had never performed UKAs performed three medial UKAs (Corin Uniglide), one per week, on dry-bone simulators by either robotic (Sculptor RGA) or conventional methods. They were instructed to match a universal 3D-CT based pre-operative plan that would result from a UKA based on the conventional jigs and operating guide. The knees were laser scanned and software used to compare the planned and actual implant positions. Feedback was given to trainees between attempts. Translational and rotational positioning errors were measured in all six degrees of freedom for both components At all attempts robotic medial UKAs were more accurate in both translational and rotational alignments for both components reaching statistical significance (p<0.005) at all attempts for rotational errors. Considering outliers, the maximum rotational errors of the robot group was 9° and 7° for the tibial and femoral components respectively. For the conventional group this reached 18° and 16° for the tibial and femoral components respectively Robotic technology allows inexperienced surgeons to perform medial UKAs on dry bone models with acceptable accuracy and precision on their first attempt. Conventional jigs do not. The adoption of robotic technology might provide new consultants with the confidence to offer UKAs to their patients by limiting the inaccuracies inherent in conventional equipment.
Osteoarticular loss in a major weightbearing joint is one of the many consequences of military conflict. While minor in terms of life and limb salvage, when rehabilitation is being planned, a small amount of joint damage can make a large impact on the level of long term disability. Reconstruction methods include allograft, massive replacement, arthrodesis and amputation. We have been developing a suite of technologies that contribute to the reconstruction of such injuries including assessment of disability in a fully instrumented gait lab, modelling of the injury using low dose CT, analysis of the extent of loss and creation of stereolithograph files of the bones, planning of the surgical procedure including implants as needed, custom manufacture of osteotomy guides and prostheses if required and technology assisted surgery, including active constraint robots. We report 3 cases of soldiers who have suffered osteoarticular loss to part of the knee, two from high velocity rounds and one from an IED. All 3 have received custom partial knee replacements preserving their cruciates, the other compartment and the patella-femoral joint. No major technical issues have been encountered. The surgery is quick and recovery simple, with the prospect of normal painfree pedestrian life. Exchange of the bearing will be necessary. It is expected and planned for once a decade as a day case procedure. While the surgery is expensive, it is highly cost-effective, as it restores near normal gait. It does not appear to be particularly risky, as the volume of tissue being excised is small, and highly constrained. The same approach is now being developed for deployment in civilian life for post traumatic osteoarthritis.
The introduction of the Stanmore Implants Savile Row mobile-bearing UKA procedure in July 2011 marked a world first – the use of a patient-specific knee implanted with robotic technology – the Sculptor Robotic Guidance Arm (RGA). This union gives a truly personalised solution by designing an implant for each patient based upon preoperative CT data and using Sculptor RGA to prepare the bone accurately so that the implant is correctly positioned as planned. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of Sculptor RGA both in-vitro and in-vivo. We report on the accuracy of our first clinical procedures. In-vitro: CTs of plastic-bones were used to create plans for Sculptor RGA, establishing a relationship between the implant position and plastic-bone (planned-transform). Sculptor RGA was then used to prepare bones for 16 UKA implants mimicking the clinical set-up. The implants were placed in the prepared bones without cement. A coordinate-measuring-arm was used to register a)the bone, and b)the implant in relation to the bone (achieved-transform). The difference between planned-and-achieved transforms gives the error in implant position. In-vivo: Preoperative CTs of 8 OA patients, acquired using the low-dose Imperial Knee CT protocol, were used to plan the position and the shape of the patient-specific implants. Intra-operatively, Sculptor RGA was used to register and prepare the bone and the implants were cemented in place. Post-operative CTs were also acquired. Two techniques were used to measure planned-to-achieved positions of the implants: 1). Preoperative-to-postoperative CT image registration followed by extraction of the achieved implant position and comparison with the plan, 2). Surface-to-surface registration of bone-models segmented from the preoperative and postoperative CTs followed by extraction of the achieved implant position and comparison with the plan.Introduction
Methods
High functional aspirations and an active ageing population equate to a growing number of patients awaiting hip arthroplasty demanding superior biomechanical function. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanics of top walking speed between two commonly used hip arthroplasty procedures to determine if a performance advantage existed. A retrospective comparative study was performed using sixty-seven subjects, twenty-two subjects in both hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty groups along with twenty-three healthy controls. All arthroplasty subjects were recruited based on high psychometric scoring and had been performed through a posterior approach, and had been discharged from follow-up. On an instrumented treadmill each subject was measured by a researcher blinded to which procedure that patient had undergone. After a six minute acclimatization period, the speed was increased incrementally until top walking performance had been attained. At all increments, ground reaction forces and temporospatial measurements were collected.Background
Methods
The combination of patient-specific “just-in-time” implant manufacture and robotic technology has not yet been reported. The robot enables accurate placement of anatomically-matched implants. It should be cost-effective, simplify the procedure, and reduce instrumentation. The aims of this study were to determine whether the procedure was safe, radiographically accurate, and comparable in time and cost to conventional arthroplasty. All patients over 3 months post-op were included. Component position, orientation and size were determined from CT scans by the surgeon prior to manufacture. The implants were inserted using the Sculptor robot, which is supplied free of cost (Savile Row, Stanmore Implants, UK). Following registration, bone was milled away using a high-speed burr under haptic control of the robot. The implants were cemented and a mobile bearing inserted. Patients were followed up clinically and radiographically. Oxford and EQ-5D scores were obtained. Costs of the implant, instruments, and consumables were calculated and compared to published data for conventional UKA and TKA.Background
Methods
Are there really ‘conventional’ bearings, offering more security and less risk than the ‘alternative’ bearings that feature in the programme? Alternative, when used as an adjective has 2 meanings: offering or expressing a choice, as in several alternative plans different from or functioning outside the usual or conventional: eg alternative newspaper, alternative rock music, alternative medicine This paper reviews the elements that make up the bearing couples available today in the developed world, and tests each bearing against these meanings. what are the alternatives? The materials available today fall into the following broad families:Introduction
Materials
Metal on Metal hip resurfacing (MoM HR) can be an effective operation for the young arthritic hip population. However, errors in cup orientation have been associated with increased wear, circulating blood metal ions, and soft tissue abnormalities that can lead to premature failure of the bearing surface and subsequent revision surgery. While image free computer guidance has been shown to increase surgical accuracy in total hip arthroplasty, the role of image based technology in MoM HR is unclear. In this study, we compared the accuracy of cup orientation in MoM HR performed by either freehand technique or CT based navigation. Seventy five patients (81 hips) underwent either freehand (n=42) or navigation (n=39) surgery, both requiring a three dimensional (3D) CT surgical plan. Surgery was conducted by hip specialists blind to the method of cup implantation until the operation. Deviation in inclination and version from the planned orientation, as well as, number of cups within a 10° safe zone and 5° optimal zone of the target position was calculated using post operative 3D CT analysis. Error in inclination was significantly reduced with navigation compared to freehand technique (4° vs 6°, p=0.02). We could not detect a difference between the two groups for version error (5° vs 7°, p=0.06). There was a significantly greater number of hips within a 10° (87% vs 67%, p=0.04) and 5° (50% vs 20%, p=0.06) safe zone when navigated. Image based navigation can substantially improve accuracy in cup orientation. The results of our freehand group appear better than historic controls, suggesting the use of a 3D plan may help to reduce technical error and improve the learning curve in this technically demanding procedure. We advocate the use of image based navigation in MoM hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
The current generation of knee replacements are based upon assumptions from kinematic studies that preceded their designs. These implants were further limited by practical restrictions imposed by affordability, materials and manufacturing, and finally by the methods available to surgeons to prepare the bone and implant them. The early designs of knee seldom distinguished left from right, as the early kinematic work had not appreciated the very different functions of the medial and lateral compartments. Trochlea shape and position within devices was also limited by the published work on the way the knee bends. Surgical insertion has been limited to landmark based registration, and adjustment of the kinematics by soft tissue releases. However accurately such operations were performed, they could not restore normal function, as the kinematics of the joint were quite different from the normal knee. Recently, we have begun to appreciate three distinct axes of the knee joint: the flexion axis, the extension axis and the trochlea axis. These can be reliably found from 3d imaging, but cannot be immediately established by eye, or by conventional jigs, which must rely on unreliable landmarks acquired in surgery. The current market leaders in knee joint sales do not reflect these three axes in their joint designs, so the instrumentation used to insert them cannot restore the kinematics of the normal knee. The emerging partial replacements can be designed to take the axes and their resulting kinematics into account. If they are then inserted using robotic assistance, or patient specific guides, they can restore joints to these axes reliably. Knee function following such conservative surgery reflects this improvement in kinematics with higher functional scores and faster top walking speeds than has ever been possible using conventional devices inserted using the conventional landmark based surgical techniques.
The radiographic analysis of over 5000 metal on metal (MoM) hips using Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse (EBRA) software have been recently published in an attempt to determine the influence of cup orientation on bearing function. The validation of this software relies one study, conducted in a phantom pelvis without a femoral head in situ. Three dimensional computed tomographic (3D-CT) has been shown to be more accurate for hip and knee arthroplasty than plain radiographs for measurements of component orientation and position. The accuracy of EBRA when compared to 3D-CT for MoM hips specifically is unclear. We measured the cup orientation of 96 large diameter MoM hips using EBRA analysis of plain radiographs and compared this to 3D-CT. All measurements were made using the radiographic definition of cup orientation. The mean difference in version between the two imaging modalities was 8°; with wide limits of agreement of −21.2° and +5.6°. Three retroverted cups were not detected by EBRA. The mean difference in inclination values was 0.3°, but there was up to 9°difference between imaging modalities. When measured by 3D CT, 64% of hips were within a 10° safe zone around 45° inclination and 20° version, compared to only 24% when measured by EBRA (Fishers Exact test, p< 0.0001). The measurement of cup orientation of MoM hips using EBRA software is insufficiently accurate, particularly for the assessment of cup version. The cup rim is obscured by the large diameter femoral head on plain radiographs. Research studies using EBRA analysis for version have limited value if accuracy of more than 20 degrees is required to draw conclusions. This software may not be suitable to measure the performance of a device or surgeon. The limitations of EBRA can be overcome, if 3D-CT with an extended Hounsfield scale for data capture is used.
Laboratory experiments and computational models were used to predict bone-implant micromotion and bone strains induced by the cemented and cementless Biomet Oxford medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) tibial implants. Ten fresh frozen cadaveric knees were implanted with cementless medial mobile UKRs, the tibias were separated and all the soft tissues were resected. Five strain gauge rosettes were attached to each tibia. Four Linear Transducers were used to measure the superior-inferior and transverse bone-implant micromotions. The cementless UKRs were assessed with 10 cycles of 1kN compressive load at 4 different bearing positions. The bone-constructs were re-assessed following cementation of the equivalent UKR. The cemented bone-implant constructs were also assessed for strain and micromotion under 10000 cycles of 10mm anterior-posterior bearing movement at 2Hz and 1kN load. The cadaveric specimens were scanned using Computed Tomography, and 3D computer models were developed using Finite Element method to predict strain and micromotion under various daily loads. Results verify computer model predictions and show bone strain pattern differences, with cemented implants distributing the loads more evenly through the bone than cementless implants. Although cementless implants showed micromotions which were greater than computer predictions, the micromotions were as expected significantly greater than those of cemented implants. The computer models reveal that bone strains approach 70% of their failure limit at the posterior and anterior corners adjoining the sagittal and transverse cuts (less pronounced in cemented implants). The base of the keel also develops high strains which can approach failure depending on the amount the implant press-fit. The contributions of the anterior cruciate and patellar tendon forces exacerbate the strains in these regions. This may explain why fractures emanate from the base of the keel and the sagittal cut.Methods
Results and Discussion
Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence (MARS) MRI is being increasingly used to detect soft tissue inflammatory reactions surrounding metal-on-metal hip replacements. The UK MHRA safety alert announced in April 2010 recommended cross-sectional imaging such as MRI for all patients with painful MOM hips. The terms used to describe the findings include bursae, cystic lesions and solid masses. A recently used term, pseudotumour, incorporates all of these lesions. We aimed to correlate the pattern of abnormalities on MRI with clinical symptoms. Following our experience with over 160 MARS MRI scans of patients with MOM hips we recognized patterns of lesions according to their: wall thickness, T1/T2 signal, shape, and location. We categorised the 79 lesions from 159 MARS MRI scans of into our novel classification scheme of 1, 2a, 2b and 3. There were two groups of patients: well functioning and painful.Introduction
Method
In large diameter hip arthroplasty, the femoral head size and shape have to be optimised to avoid neck on socket impingement if the head is too small, or psoas tendonopathy if the head is too large, overhanging the normal head neck junction in the sagittal plane. Currently there is no published guideline to help the surgeon select an optimal size femoral head. Instead, the novice surgeon may inadvertently oversize the femoral component through fear of notching the femoral neck—causing psoas impingement, especially in female patients. We sought to provide anatomically based advice for surgeons to optimise both the position of the femoral head and the head neck ratio. 100 hips were reviewed. Fifty radiographically normal hips in elderly patients with fractures of the contralateral side and 50 hips from patients whose contralateral side was arthritic secondary, either to Cam or pincer type impingement, or DDH. The head neck ratios were calculated using two methods: the plain AP radiographs were measured on PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) and CT scans obtained as part of the work up to hip surgery were measured in validation. The head neck ratio was calculated by dividing the diameter of the widest point across the femoral head by the narrowest part across the femoral neck. The HNR of 39 patients who attended a painful MOM clinic were also reviewed.Background
Materials and Methods
In 2009, surgeon error is a major factor contributing to premature failure in conventional arthroplasty. Technology has revolutionised quality control in all manufacturing industries, yet it has made little or no impact on practice in arthroplasty. Currently, no agreed standards exist—in either the UK or Australia— that allows us to state whether or not the operation was performed correctly. In hip arthroplasty, acetabular orientation may be considered a non-controversial metric for assessing surgical precision in hip arthroplasty. We considered that a trained surgeon should be able to orientate the acetabular component within the safe zone 19 times out of 20. 40 trainees at different stages in their training and 20 trained surgeons, (half of whom had performed over 1000 hip replacements) were assessed for their ability to orient an acetabular cup within the safe zone on three stations, one with the pelvis in the anatomic orientation, one with the pelvis in a distorted position, and one with the pelvis clad in a body preventing reliable palpation of landmarks and in a distorted position. Their scores were compared to the standard we set, and to the scores of medical students using robotic technology to assist them.Introduction
Materials and methods
Wear measurements of 100 explanted hips have been carried out on a Taylor Hobson 365 Roundness Machine using the LIRC Wear Protocol. It was found that 50% of explanted cups were wearing less than 5 μm/year and 60% of components were wearing less than 10 μm/year. Wear tests on hip joint simulators predict wear rates between 2 and 8 μm/year. However, 6% of cups are wearing faster than 100 μm/year, with 16% of cups have wear patches deeper than 100 μm and that 4% have a wear patch deeper than 300 μm.
Cup position is an important factor, all of the high wearing components are outside the Lewinick’s Box, however it is shown that mal position is does not always lead to extreme wear. Further analysis is taking place to calculate the size of the contact patch between head and cup (based on patient data and biomechanics) and the proximity of the contact patch to the edge of the cup.
A robust frame of reference is required to accurately characterize pathoanatomy in the proximal femur and quantify the femoral head-neck relationship. A three dimensional (3D) femoral neck axis (FNA) could serve such a purpose, but has not yet been established in the current literature. The primary aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a reliable method of determining the 3D femoral neck axis. Secondly, we wanted to quantify the translational relationship between the femoral head and neck in normal and cam type hips. Pelvic computed tomographic scans (CT) and radiographs were retrieved from our database of patients who had undergone navigated hip surgery or CT colonography. All patients had given informed consent for their medical files and imaging to be used for research purposes, as approved by the institutional review board. Pre-operative scans were performed using the Siemens Sensation 64 slice scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). The Imperial Protocol developed at the authors’ orthopaedic unit was applied, allowing acquisition of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files of 0.75mm thickness. Normal and cam type hips (n=30) were identified for analysis. ‘Normal’ hips (n=15) were defined in asymptomatic patients with no previous history of hip disease, and, no obvious abnormality on radiographs or CT. The ‘cam’ hip type (n=15) was defined by the presence of an anterior osseous bump at the head-neck junction, and an alpha angle greater than 50° on hip radiographs. DICOMs were converted to 3D stereolith (STL) images using validated commercial image processing and analysis software (3-Matics, Materialise Group, Leuven, Belgium). In order to determine the 3D-FNA, a best fit sphere was applied to the femoral head with a root mean square error of less than 0.5mm. The border between sphere and femoral neck defined the head -neck junction. The bone surface was marked here (including the anterior bump in cam hips) and at the neck base, providing two anatomical rings that defined the superior and inferior limits of the femoral neck. The centre point of each ring was calculated. A line connecting these points defined the femoral neck axis, and was verified on a DICOM viewer in sagittal, axial and coronal planes. The offset between the femoral head centre and neck axis was measured. The 3D image and axis were further analysed to examine the femoral head-neck relationship, using customized software developed at our institution and previously validated in previous research projects. To standardize rotational alignment, the femoral neck was aligned vertically in two planes by creating an axis between the tip of the greater trochanter and the center of the lesser trochanter. The aligned proximal femur was viewed end on, and the version of the head relative to the neck determined by calculating the angle between the head centre and a vertical marker placed at the 12 o’clock position. Angles below 180° demonstrated anteversion, while those above 180° demonstrated retroversion.
A profound understanding of the pathoanatomy of the patellofemoral joint is considered to be fundamental for navigated knee arthroplasty. Previous studies used less sophisticated imaging modalities such as photography and plain radiographs or direct measurement tools like probes and micrometers to define the morphology of the trochlear groove, with differing results. This may be due to the complexity of the biomechanics and the geometry of this joint. Our primary goal was to compare normal, osteoarthritic and dysplastic PFJs in terms of angles and distances. To do this we first had to establish a reliable frame of reference. Computed tomography scans of 40 normal knees (>
55 years old), 9 knees with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (group A) and 12 knees with trochlear dysplasia (group B) were analyzed using 3D software. The femurs were orientated using a robust frame of reference. A circle was fitted to the trochlear groove. The novel trochlear axis was defined as a line joining the centres of two spheres fitted to the trochlear surfaces, lateral and medial to the trochlear groove. The relationship between the femoral trochlea and the tibiofemoral joint was measured in term of angles and distances (offsets). T-test for paired samples was used (p<
0.05). The study was approved by the institutional review conforming to the state laws and regulations. The normal trochlear groove closely matched a circle (RMS 0.3mm). It was positioned laterally in relation to the mechanical, anatomical, and trans-condylar axes of the femur. It was not co-planar with any of the three axes. After aligning to the new trochlear axis, the trochlear groove appeared more linear than when other axes were used. In comparison to the normal knees; the medial trochlear was smaller in group A (p=0.0003)- see figure 2. The lateral trochlear was smaller in group B (p=0.04). The trochlear groove was smaller in groups B (p=0.0003). Both trochlear centers in groups A+B were more centralized (p=0.00002–0.03). The medial trochlear center was more distal in group A (p=0.03) and the lateral trochlear center was more distal in group B (p=0.00009). The trochlear groove started more distal in group B (p=0.0007). A better understanding of the 3-dimensional geometry can help better treat or even prevent the progression of disease to the stage of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. In osteoarthritic and dysplastic patellofemoral joints, the trochlea is both smaller and more distally located along the femur. These two factors may contribute to excessive loads that lead to early joint wear. These differences could have biomechanical implications and give us an insight into why joints fail. The data collected may also help in improving current designs and current navigational and surgical techniques used for the treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
When navigating patellofemoral/unicompartmental knee surgery, the surgeon makes assumptions based upon algorithms developed for total knee arthroplasty. In this study we set out to show how variable the normal knee is. Minor anatomical variations in the shape of our knee may make a big difference in terms of orientation and joint wear patterns. Tibial patho-morphology has been described as a factor that predisposes to medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee (anteromedial-OA), yet this is limited to 2D analysis. We aimed to describe the 3D morphology of both the tibial and femoral components of the medial compartment of the knee. We hypothesized that morphological differences do exist between normal knees and those predisposed to osteoarthritis. A total of 20 normal (group A) and 20 pre-OA knees (group B) were included. Group A consisted of contra lateral knees of young patients (<
55 years) awaiting hip surgery and group B of asymptomatic contra lateral knees of patients awaiting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Using 3D reconstructions from CT scans, we analyzed the tibiofemoral joint, which consists of the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau. The femur was aligned to the transcondylar and anatomical axes. The medial femoral extension facet (MFEF) was modeled as a segment of a sphere. The offsets between the MFEF centre and the medial femoral flexion facet centre were measured. The MFEF radius and the MFEF 2D arc angle in the sagittal plane were also measured. The tibias were aligned for flexion-extension and varus-valgus to a flat portion of the flexion facet (flexion facet plane), which lie’s roughly perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis. To control for axial rotation, the anatomical tibial axis was used. A model of analysis was developed by rotating several increments towards and away from the midline to obtain several sagittal section images. For each sagittal section the medial tibial extension facet (MTEF) slope angle, its length, and the medial tibial submeniscal plane (MTSP) angle and length were analyzed. The relative length proportions of the MTEF, medial tibial flexion facet and MTSP were also measured. The MFEF was larger and more offset in pre-OA knees. Pre-OA knees also had a significantly larger MFEF arc angle than normals (p<
0.05). The MTEF appeared similar between normal and pre-OA knees. The submeniscal plane was highly variable between subjects but on average horizontally inclined (median 0o, range −15–14o) and formed a crescent shape anteriorly. There was no significant difference in tibial measured parameters between normal and pre-OA tibias (p>
0.05). The method showed good reproducibility using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC value>
0.9) and Bland-Altman plot analysis. This study gives the CAOS surgeon some interesting insights into the anatomical variation of the normal knee. We have found evidence of a predisposing patho-morphology to medial-OA in the femoral condyle, but not the tibia. There is evidence of an enlarged flatter extension facet on the medial femoral condyle in the pre-OA knees, with no significant difference in the geometry of the medial tibial plateau, which is now reliably defined based upon a flexion plateau frame of reference.
Cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is currently treated by resecting the femoral cam lesion. Some surgeons advocate additional anterosuperior acetabular rim resection. However, the exact acetabular contribution to cam-FAI has yet to be described. Using 3D-CT analysis, we set out to quantify the acetabular rim shape and orientation in this condition, and to determine the roles of these factors in cam-FAI. The acetabula of twenty consecutive cam hips (defined by α-angle of Notzli greater than 55° on plain radiographs) undergoing image based navigated surgery. These were compared with twenty normal hips (defined as disease free sockets with a normal femoral head-neck junction) obtained from a CT colonoscopy database. Using 3D reconstruction software, the pelvis was aligned to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Starting at the most anterior rim point, successive markers were placed along the rim. A best-fit acetabular rim plane (ARP) was derived, and the subtended angle (SA) between each rim marker and a normal vector from the acetabular centre was calculated. Values above 90° indicated a peak, with less than 90° representing a trough. Inclination and version were measured from the APP. Our results showed that the rim profile of both cam-type and normal acetabular is an asymmetric succession of three peaks and three troughs. However, the cam-type acetabulum is significantly shallower overall than normal (Mean SA: 84±5° versus 87±4°, p<
0.0001). In particular, at anatomical points in the impingement zone between 12 and 3 o’clock, the subtended angle of cam hips were never higher than normal, and, in fact, at certain points were lower (iliac eminence: 90±5° vs. 93±4° p=0.0094, iliopubic trough: 79±5° vs. 83±4° p=0.0169, pubic eminence 83±7° vs. 84±4° p=0.4445). The orientation of cam and normal hips were almost identical (Inclination: 53±4°vs. 51±3° p=0.2609 and Anteversion: 23±7° vs. 24±6° p=0.3917). We concluded that cam-type acetabula are significantly shallower than normal. The subtended angles at all points around the hip were lower, and in particular, in the impingement zone between 12 and 3 o’clock not one cam had a subtended angle over 90°. We have therefore been unable to support the hypothesis of mixed-type FAI in cam-type hips. Bony rim resection in cam hips therefore runs the risk of rendering the acetabulum more morphologically abnormal and even functionally dysplastic. We do not recommend acetabular rim resection in patients with pure cam-type impingement, and await the longer-term results of this practice with apprehension.
Differing descriptions of patellar motion relative to the femur have resulted from many in-vitro and in-vivo studies. The aim of this study was to examine the tracking behaviour of the patella. We hypothesized that patellar kinematics would correlate to the trochlear geometry and that differing previous descriptions could be reconciled by accounting for differing alignments of measurement axes. Seven normal fresh-frozen knees were CT scanned and their kinematics with quadriceps loading was measured by an optical tracker system and calculated in relation to the previously-established femoral axes. CT scans were used to reliably define frames of reference for the femur, tibia and the patella. A novel trochlear axis was defined, between the centres of best-fit medial and lateral trochlear articular surfaces spheres. The path of the centre of the patella was circular and uniplanar (RMS error 0.3mm) above 16°±3° knee flexion. The distal end of the median ridge of the patella entered the groove at 6° knee flexion, and the midpoint at 22°. This circle was aligned 6.4° ± 1.6° (mean± SD) from the femoral anatomical axis, 91.2°±3.4° from the epicondylar axis, and 88.3°±3° from the trochlear axis, in the coronal plane. In the transverse plane it was 91.2°±3.4° and 88.3°±3° from the epicondylar and trochlear axes. Manipulation of the data to different axis alignments showed that differing previously-published data could be reconciled. When the anatomic axis of the femur was used to align the coordinates, there was an initial medial and then a lateral translation. Comparing this with the uniplanar and circular path of the center of the patella, it shows that the orientation of the femoral coordinate system affects the description of the patellar medial-lateral translation. This study has shown the effect of using different coordinate systems on reporting the patellar translation. Choosing a femoral reference that is more in line with the plane of the circular path of motion and the trochlear groove in the coronal plane diminishes the reported subsequent lateral translation of the patella. Once the frame of reference had been aligned to the trochlear axis, there was minimum medial-lateral translation of the patella.
A 10° deviation from the ideal cup orientation in Metal on Metal (MoM) bearing couples leads to increased wear and the subsequent risk of early revision surgery. We assessed the accuracy of orthopaedic trainees and consultants in achieving optimal acetabular cup orientation. 49 trainees and 18 consultants were asked to orientate an acetabular component to 40° inclination and 20° anteversion in 3 consecutive pelvic models:
osteoarthritic (OA), OA with anterior pelvic tilt, OA with soft tissue cladding, the task most realistic of a surgical scenario. The trainee group experience in performing hip arthroplasty procedures ranged from novice to expert (>
100 procedures performed). Performance was measured using an image based navigation system. Average angular error in all tasks was less than 10°, but the range in anteversion or inclination was up to 65°. Eighteen percent of trainees were +/− 10° of the target orientation in Station A, 29% in B and 2% in C. Forty four percent of consultants achieved the safe zone in A, 16% in B and 0% in C. There was no significant difference in accuracy between the two groups in any of the tasks (p>
0.01). There was no correlation between experience and angular accuracy. We have been unable to demonstrate trainees have the ability to achieve the optimal cup orientation in a clinically relevant safe zone. A similar range of error is found in experienced surgeons. Focused training or intra-operative computer assistance may provide the solution to improving accuracy in this core orthopaedic skill.
