A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE PATHOANATOMY OF THE PATELLOFEMORAL JOINTS- A CHANCE FOR IMPROVEMENT OF NAVIGATED KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

A profound understanding of the pathoanatomy of the patellofemoral joint is considered to be fundamental for navigated knee arthroplasty. Previous studies used less sophisticated imaging modalities such as photography and plain radiographs or direct measurement tools like probes and micrometers to define the morphology of the trochlear groove, with differing results. This may be due to the complexity of the biomechanics and the geometry of this joint. Our primary goal was to compare normal, osteoarthritic and dysplastic PFJs in terms of angles and distances. To do this we first had to establish a reliable frame of reference.

Computed tomography scans of 40 normal knees (> 55 years old), 9 knees with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (group A) and 12 knees with trochlear dysplasia (group B) were analyzed using 3D software. The femurs were orientated using a robust frame of reference. A circle was fitted to the trochlear groove. The novel trochlear axis was defined as a line joining the centres of two spheres fitted to the trochlear surfaces, lateral and medial to the trochlear groove. The relationship between the femoral trochlea and the tibiofemoral joint was measured in term of angles and distances (offsets). T-test for paired samples was used (p< 0.05). The study was approved by the institutional review conforming to the state laws and regulations.

The normal trochlear groove closely matched a circle (RMS 0.3mm). It was positioned laterally in relation to the mechanical, anatomical, and trans-condylar axes of the femur. It was not co-planar with any of the three axes. After aligning to the new trochlear axis, the trochlear groove appeared more linear than when other axes were used. In comparison to the normal knees; the medial trochlear was smaller in group A (p=0.0003)- see figure 2. The lateral trochlear was smaller in group B (p=0.04). The trochlear groove was smaller in groups B (p=0.0003). Both trochlear centers in groups A+B were more centralized (p=0.00002–0.03). The medial trochlear center was more distal in group A (p=0.03) and the lateral trochlear center was more distal in group B (p=0.00009). The trochlear groove started more distal in group B (p=0.0007).

A better understanding of the 3-dimensional geometry can help better treat or even prevent the progression of disease to the stage of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. In osteoarthritic and dysplastic patellofemoral joints, the trochlea is both smaller and more distally located along the femur. These two factors may contribute to excessive loads that lead to early joint wear. These differences could have biomechanical implications and give us an insight into why joints fail. The data collected may also help in improving current designs and current navigational and surgical techniques used for the treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.