SURGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ACETABULAR MORPHOLOGY IN CAM-TYPE FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT: A 3D STUDY

Abstract

Cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is currently treated by resecting the femoral cam lesion. Some surgeons advocate additional anterosuperior acetabular rim resection. However, the exact acetabular contribution to cam-FAI has yet to be described. Using 3D-CT analysis, we set out to quantify the acetabular rim shape and orientation in this condition, and to determine the roles of these factors in cam-FAI.

The acetabula of twenty consecutive cam hips (defined by α-angle of Notzli greater than 55° on plain radiographs) undergoing image based navigated surgery. These were compared with twenty normal hips (defined as disease free sockets with a normal femoral head-neck junction) obtained from a CT colonoscopy database.

Using 3D reconstruction software, the pelvis was aligned to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Starting at the most anterior rim point, successive markers were placed along the rim. A best-fit acetabular rim plane (ARP) was derived, and the subtended angle (SA) between each rim marker and a normal vector from the acetabular centre was calculated. Values above 90° indicated a peak, with less than 90° representing a trough. Inclination and version were measured from the APP.

Our results showed that the rim profile of both cam-type and normal acetabular is an asymmetric succession of three peaks and three troughs. However, the cam-type acetabulum is significantly shallower overall than normal (Mean SA: 84±5° versus 87±4°, p< 0.0001). In particular, at anatomical points in the impingement zone between 12 and 3 o’clock, the subtended angle of cam hips were never higher than normal, and, in fact, at certain points were lower (iliac eminence: 90±5° vs. 93±4° p=0.0094, iliopubic trough: 79±5° vs. 83±4° p=0.0169, pubic eminence 83±7° vs. 84±4° p=0.4445). The orientation of cam and normal hips were almost identical (Inclination: 53±4°vs. 51±3° p=0.2609 and Anteversion: 23±7° vs. 24±6° p=0.3917).

We concluded that cam-type acetabula are significantly shallower than normal. The subtended angles at all points around the hip were lower, and in particular, in the impingement zone between 12 and 3 o’clock not one cam had a subtended angle over 90°. We have therefore been unable to support the hypothesis of mixed-type FAI in cam-type hips.

Bony rim resection in cam hips therefore runs the risk of rendering the acetabulum more morphologically abnormal and even functionally dysplastic. We do not recommend acetabular rim resection in patients with pure cam-type impingement, and await the longer-term results of this practice with apprehension.