Background: Knee prosthesis design is being constantly altered in a bid to imitate kinematics of the normal knee. It is hoped that this will improve the wear characteristics and performance of the implant. The ‘Medial Pivot’ knee has a characteristic geometry and is expected to lower contact stresses on the tibial surface and ease rehabilitation while providing greater stability. We conducted a study comparing the midterm outcome of the Medial Pivot knee (MP) to the Posterior Stabilised (PS) knee. Materials and Methods: Over a 3 year period, 312 knee replacements were carried out of which 124 were MP and 188 were PS. 100 patients from each of the 2 groups were called for review. Demographic data, age at operation, time since surgery and ASA grading were noted. Postoperative knee function was assessed using the American Knee Society (AKS) and Oxford Knee (OK) scores and the scores were compared between the 2 groups. Individual functional parameters were also compared. Results: 38 patients with 42 replaced knees in the MP group and 43 patients with 52 replaced knees in the PS group were reviewed. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of gender of patients and age at operation and were followed up to a mean 31 months. For the MP group the mean AKS knee assessment score was 77/100, AKS function score was 75/100 and OK Score was 23/60. For the PS group the corresponding values were 81/100, 77/100 and 22/60. The differences in scores between the groups were not statistically significant. Only active and passive knee extension was better following MP Arthroplasty than PS arthroplasty (p< 0.05). Although the mean flexion was better following the PS arthroplasty, this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our study has shown that the midterm outcome for the Medial Pivot knee system did not show any distinct advantage over the Posterior Stabilised knee system in terms of knee pain & function

Prior implant designs have relied on a four-bar link theory and featured J-curve femoral components intended to recreate femoral rollback of the native knee, but this design could lead to anterior femoral sliding or paradoxical motion. Recent kinematic analyses of the native human knee have shown the medial compartment to be more stable to anteroposterior translation than the lateral, resulting in a “medial pivot” motion as the knee flexes. “Medial pivot” designs in total knee arthroplasty were introduced in the 1990s to attempt to re-create this motion. They consist of an asymmetric tibial insert with a highly congruent medial compartment and less conforming lateral compartment. The femoral component has a single radius of curvature and a high degree of conformity. In vivo fluoroscopic studies have shown medial pivot designs to be successful in achieving its intended motion, while other cruciate-retaining designs had a higher incidence of paradoxical anterior translation and lateral condylar lift-off. Furthermore, numerous investigations have shown medial pivot designs to have excellent outcomes and survivorship at up to 10 years post-operatively. However, the contention in this debate that medial pivot designs avoid the need for ligament balancing is incorrect. Appropriate ligament balancing remains a crucial aspect of any successful total knee arthroplasty and is no less important based on the implant design utilised. In the Methods section of all prior reports using a medial pivot design, the authors have noted that appropriate ligament balancing was obtained both in flexion and extension consistent with the recommended technique with other primary TKA implant designs. From a kinematic standpoint, this makes absolute sense. If a patient has a valgus imbalance with loose medial structures, then as the knee is brought into flexion the femur will not maintain congruency and contact with the conforming tibial surface – thus the medial pivot motion will be lost. Thus, balancing remains critical. Lastly, although not the focal point of this debate, whether re-creation of a medial pivot motion in total knee arthroplasty actually improves patient outcomes remains an area of debate. A recent investigation by Warth and Meneghini, et al. demonstrated that re-creation of a medial-pivot pattern intra-operatively did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes at 1-year post-operatively. Thus, although the concept of a medial pivot design has merit, whether this will consistently improve outcomes and patient satisfaction remains to be seen

Introduction and Objective. Kinematic Alignment (KA) is a surgical technique that restores the native knee alignment following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The association of this technique with a medial pivot implant design (MP) attempts to reestablish the physiological kinematics of the knee. Aim of this study is to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing MP-TKA with kinematic alignment, and to assess the effect of the limb alignment and the orientation of the tibial component on the clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 63 patients who underwent kinematic aligned medial pivot TKA from September 2018 to January 2020. Patient-Related Outcomes (PROMs) and radiological measures were collected at baseline, 3 months and 12 months after surgery. Results. We demonstrated a significant improvement in the clinical and functional outcomes starting from 3 months after surgery. This finding was also confirmed at the longest follow-up. The clinical improvement was independent from the limb alignment and from the orientation of the tibial component. The radiological analysis showed that the patient's native limb alignment was restored, and that the joint line orientation maintained the parallelism to the floor when standing. This latter result has a particular relevance, as it may positively influence the outcomes, reducing the risk of wear and mobilization of the implant. Conclusions. The association of kinematic alignment and a medial pivot TKA implant allows for a fast recovery, good clinical and functional outcomes, independently from the final limb alignment and the tibial component orientation

Introduction. The alternative kinematic alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims at restoring the native joint line orientation and laxity of the knee. The goal is to generate a more physiological prosthetic knee enabling higher functional performance and satisfaction for the patient. KA TKA have only been reported so far with cruciate retaining and posterior-stabilised designs. Similarly, medial pivot design for TKA has been recently developed to enable more natural knee kinematics and antero-posterior stability. The superiority of KA technique and medial pivot implant design is still controversial when compared to current practice. Our study aims to assess the value of KA TKA when performed with medial pivot implants. Methods. We conducted a retrospectively matched case-control study. Clinical data was prospectively collected on patients as part of an ongoing ODEP study. Thirty-three non-selected consecutive KA TKAs performed by the lead author were matched to a control group of 33 measured resection with mechanically aligned (MA) TKAs performed by other consultant surgeons. Patients were matched for sex, age, BMI and pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Pre-operative median OKS was 21 points (max 48), mean age was 69, mean BMI 31, and there were 21 female patients in both arms. The medial pivot GMK Sphere implant (Medacta, Switzerland) was used in all cases. OKS and EQ-5D scores were measured pre-operatively and at 1-year post-op. Patient outcome satisfaction scores were assessed at 1-year follow-up using a visual analogic scale (VAS). Pre- and post-operative knee radiographs were analysed using TraumaCad software. Results. No reoperation or revision was recorded in either group. KA patients were found to have higher OKS (median 44 Vs 42, p=0.78), satisfaction (median 99/100 Vs 90/100, p=0.28), and EQ-5D improvement (mean 0.34 Vs 0.28, p=0.21) compared to MA patients; however, none of the differences discovered were statistically significant. In addition, KA patients had a femoral component that was on average, 3.5° more valgus orientated (aLDFA 84° Vs 80°, p<0.05) and 2.1° more flexed (4.4° Vs 2.3°, p=NS), and a tibial component with 3.6° (aMPTA 86° Vs 89.6°, p<0.05) and 3.9° (5.5° Vs 1.6°, p<0.05) increased varus orientation and posterior slope, respectively. Conclusion/Discussion. KA TKA performed with medial pivot implant design has shown good safety and efficacy at early-term. The physiological implantation provided by the KA technique seems to be clinically beneficial compared to MA implantation, although, the measured differences did not show statistical significance. Having a low study power and high ceiling effect of outcome measure tools may partly explain our results. Early results for KA TKA are encouraging and longer follow-up is warranted to assess longevity of results. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. In total knee arthroplasty, the aim is to relieve pain and provide a stable, functional knee. Sagittal stability is crucial in enabling a patient to return to functional activities. Knee implants with a medial pivot (MP) design are thought to more accurately reproduce the mechanics of the native joint, and potentially confer greater antero-posterior stability through the range of flexion than some other implant designs. Aim. This study aims to compare the sagittal stability of four different total knee arthroplasty implant designs. Method. Comparison was made between four different implant designs: medial pivot (MP), two different types of cruciate retaining (CR1 and CR 2) and deep dish (DD). A cohort of 30 Medial Pivot (MP) knees were compared with matched patients from each of the other designs, 10 in each group. Patients were matched for age, body mass index and time to follow up. Clinical examination was carried out by an orthopaedic surgeon blinded to implant type, and sagittal stability was tested using a KT1000 knee arthrometer, applying 67N of force at 30˚ and 90˚. Results. The MP knee was more stable than the CR1 knee at both 30º (mean movement: 1.37mm vs 2.48mm, p=0.037) and 90º (1.68mm vs 2.37mm, p=0.030). The MP knee was more stable than the CR2 knee at 30º (0.98mm vs1.33mm, p=0.013). The MP knee also demonstrated less movement at 90 º (0.98mm vs 1.33mm), but this was not statistically significant (p=0.156). The MP knee was more stable than the DD knee at 30 º (0.48mm vs 1.33mm, p=0.03) and 90 º (0.67mm vs 1.15mm, p=0.048). Overall the medial pivot design was more stable than all non-medial pivot designs at 30 º (0.8mm vs1.66mm, p=0.003) and 90 º (1.1mm vs 1.61mm, p= 0.008). Conclusion. Overall, the medial pivot design demonstrated significantly greater antero-posterior stability than all other design types included in this study. Correlation with patient reported outcome scales will allow insight into whether these statistically significant differences are also clinically significant

Introduction. Joint kinematics following total knee replacement (TKR) is important as it affects joint loading, joint functionality, implant wear and ultimately patient comfort and satisfaction. It is believed that restoring the natural motion of the joint (such as the screw-home mechanism) with a medial pivot knee implant will improve clinical outcomes. Daily activities such as stair climbing and stair descent are among the most difficult tasks for these patients. This study analysed dynamic knee joint motion after implantation of a medial pivot knee implant using fluoroscopy during stair ascent and descent activity. Methods. Ethics approval was granted by Macquarie University to undertake fluoroscopic testing. Four patients who had undergone a TKR were asked to participate in the study. All patients were operated by a single surgeon (JS) and were implanted with a medial pivot knee prosthesis (Sphere, Medacta International). Participants were tested at the 12 month post-operative time- point. Participants were asked to step up or down a short stair-case at a comfortable self-selected speed. Fluroscopic images were taken using a flat panel Artis Zeego (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen) angiography system during the dynamic activity. Images were processed using Joint Track Auto (Banks, University of Florida), whereby the specific femoral and tibial component CAD files were superimposed onto the fluoroscopic images, ensuring an optimised match to the outlined components. Joint kinematics were calculated using custom written code in Matlab 2017a. Results. The average maximum flexion angle during stair ascent was 64° at the time when the foot had touched the step. The average minimum flexion angle during this activity was 7.9°. On average, the tibia externally rotated relative to the femur by 3.6° as the knee extended. During stair descent the average flexion angle changed from a minimum of 4.3° of flexion to a maximum of 29.3° of flexion. The average change in internal rotation between 10° flexion and 25° flexion was 1.05°. Conclusion. The stair ascent activity showed the joint to undergo the natural screw-home mechanism motion; experiencing 4° of internal rotation over a 57° flexion angle range. The stair descent activity exhibited a lower level of internal- external rotation. This may be due to a smaller flexion angle range during this activity as well other mechanisms such as motion adaptation of the patient when descending stairs, not related to implant design

INTRODUCTION. The purpose of TKA is to restore normal kinematics and functioning to diseased knees. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative kinematic data are correlated with minimum one-year outcomes following primary TKA. METHODS. We reviewed data on 185 consecutive primary TKAs in which sensor-embedded tibial trials were used to evaluate kinematic patterns following traditional ligament balancing. Procedures were performed by two board-certified arthroplasty surgeons. The same implant design and surgical approach was used for all knees. Contact locations on the medial and lateral condyles were recorded for each patient at 0°, 45° and 90° of flexion, and full flexion. Vector equations were created by contact locations on the medial and lateral sides and the vector intersections determined the center of rotation between each measurement position. Center of rotation was calculated as the average of vector intersections at 0 to 45°, 45 to 90°, and 90° to full flexion. If the average center of rotation was between 16 and 1000 mm of the contact location on the medial side it was considered a medial pivot knee. Knees were also classified as medial (16 to 200 mm on medial side), lateral (16 to 200 mm on lateral side), translating (> 200 mm medially or laterally), and other (< 16 mm on both medial and lateral sides). The new Knee Society Scoring System (KSSO objective score, KSSS satisfaction score, KSSF function score), the EQ-5D™ Health Status Index, and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Level Score were measured preoperatively and at minimum one-year follow-up (average 20.4 months). RESULTS. Thirty-three TKAs were excluded to eliminate potential bias due to sensor device malfunction, atypical hardware, unresurfaced patella, surgery at a non-study hospital, or early postoperative infection, revision due to aseptic loosening, ipsilateral hip disease, and subsequent neurologic disease or death unrelated to the index TKA, resulting in a final sample size of 152 knees. Twelve (7.9%) patients were lost to follow-up, and two were excluded due to outlier values for average center of rotation. Seventy-five percent of the final sample was female. Mean age and BMI were 63.6 years 33.9, respectively. Average center of rotation ranged from −1017 to 1562 mm with negative signifying the lateral side. Medial pivot knees comprised 40% (55) of the total sample. Sex, age, height, surgeon, implant side, and implant type were unrelated to pivot classification. Patient weight (100.2 vs. 90.9 kg; p = 0.012) and BMI (35.5 vs. 32.8; p = 0.044) were greater in medial pivot knees. Controlling for BMI, KSSO, KSSF, KSSS, EQ5D, UCLA, and pain scores at latest follow-up did not differ in medial and non-medial pivot knees (p ≥ 0.151). The amount of improvement in outcomes from preoperative baseline also did not differ in medial and non-medial pivot knees (p ≥ 0.161). Outcomes did not vary among knees with translating medial, lateral, and other pivots (p ≥ 0.065). DISCUSSION. Our results suggest that a medial pivot kinematic pattern may not be a substantial governor of clinical success

Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty is designed to permit posterior rolling and sliding of the lateral femoral condyle around a stable medial femoral condyle. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the weight-bearing kinematics of medial pivot TKA’s with three different treatments of the posterior cruciate ligament: PCL resected, PCL partially released and PCL retained, to determine if the PCL status had a significant effect on tibiofemoral translations or rotations in a medial pivot TKA design. In vivo kinematics were determined for 17 clinically successful total knee arthroplasties during a stair-climbing activity using lateral fluoroscopy and shape matching techniques. All three groups showed similar medial pivot motions. PCL retained knees showed significantly greater tibial internal rotation than PCL resected knees for flexion of 30° and greater. Rotation of the PCL released knees was midway between PCL resected and PCL retained knees. Regardless of PCL treatment, patients with medial pivot total knee arthroplasties had medial pivot motion patterns during stair climbing activities. This study showed a clear and intuitive trend in motions with PCL-treatment, such that knees with partially released PCL’s had kinematics midway between those where the PCL was either fully maintained or fully resected

Postoperative stiffness is a relatively uncommon issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it can be a debilitating complication when it occurs. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is commonly used as the primary treatment modality following failed physiotherapy. The ADVANCE® Medial Pivot Knee (Wright Medical Technology) was created in an effort to prevent stiffness postoperatively and increase range of motion. The EVOLUTION® Medial Pivot Knee is a second generation design that builds upon the technology of the ADVANCE® knee. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 881 primary medial pivot knees (592 ADVANCE® knees, 289 EVOLUTION® knees). We theorized that the design changes made to the EVOLUTION® knees might contribute toward reducing the need for MUA. We found that the EVOLUTION® knees required significantly fewer manipulations under anesthesia (p = 0.036). The design modifications made to the EVOLUTION® knees may have contributed to the lower rate of MUA

The long-term survival of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been well established; however, functional outcome remains inconsistent. More normal postoperative TKA kinematics have been shown to produce better knee function. Improved kinematics can be obtained by using implants with optimised surface geometry. Hence a TKA with an appropriate surface geometryis likely to provide superior long-term functional outcome. The Advance-Medial Pivot TKA (Wright Medical) is a fixed bearing prosthesis with a conforming medial compartment and a non-conforming (flat on flat) lateral compartment. This surface geometry is designed with the intention of replicating the normal knee motion of sliding or pivoting medially and rolling back laterally. Aim: To investigate the sagittal plane kinematics of Advanced Medial Pivot Knee and compare with those of “flat on flat” fixed bearing TKA and normal knees. 18 patients who had undergone primary TKA for osteoarthritis were recruited at an average of 18 months post operation. These patients performed flexion and extension exercises against gravity and a step up exercise. Video fluoroscopy of these activities was used to obtain the patellar tendon angle (PTA). This is a previously validated method for assessing sagittal plane kinematics of a knee joint. The kinematic profile of the Advance Medial Pivot Knee was compared to the profile of 14 normal knees and 30 flat on flat, fixed bearing TKA’s. The sagittal plane kinematics of the Advance TKA differed from the normal knees. However, similarly to normal knees, a linear relationship was observed between PTA and knee flexion angle throughout knee flexion range. The kinematics of the Medial Pivot Knee were similar to normal when the knee was in a highly flexed position. Functional plane kinematics of the Advance Medial Pivot TKA appear to meet the design criteria in that a linear relationship between PTA and flexion angle is maintained. Further work is required to establish if these improved sagittal plane kinematics translate into improved functional outcome

Most total knee prostheses are designed to have limited congruence between the femoral and tibial components to reduce constraint, based on the widely accepted principle that “constraint causes loosening”. Studies of the normal knee, however, indicate that stability under axial load occurs mostly by the geometric conformity of the surfaces. When moving in the plane of flexion-extension, the ligaments contribute little to stability because the ligaments are in the “toe-region” of their force-displacement curve. When an “out-of-plane” load is applied (i.e., load outside the plane of flexion-extension), ligaments are “recruited” for stability by being stressed into the elastic portion of the curve to resist the load. For the traditional total knee prosthesis, because of the lack of geometric congruity, the ligaments must provide all stability by being “balanced”, i.e. tensioned into the elastic portion of the force-displacement curve. Further, they must remain in that tensioned state indefinitely, with no stretching or migration of the implant. The medial pivot knee design has a fully conforming medial “ball-in-socket” articulation that provides stability to the knee through the geometric conformity. Ligaments need not be tensioned into the elastic region of the force-displacement curve but can be left in the toe-region to be recruited for out-of-plane loads. Clinical follow-up results in patients with a medial pivot prosthesis indicate that, based on Knee Society and WOMAC scores, patients report greater than 90% satisfaction with pain and function. Further, the most satisfied patients are those who, during physical examination, display medial and lateral opening that might be classified as “mid-flexion instability” for prostheses that depend on ligament tensioning for stability

Introduction: Restoration of predictable and normal knee kinematics after a TKR can improve the patient’s function. Traditional designs exhibit grossly abnormal kinematics with the femur subluxing posteriorly in extension and a paradoxical forward slide in flexion. In addition, the kinematics are very variable. Newer designs were intended to overcome these problems, owing to their ability to provide ‘guided motion’ of the components. The medial pivot knee uses a specifically designed articulating surface constraining the femoral component to externally rotate about an axis through the medial compartment. This study assesses the functional in vivo kinematics of Advanced Medial Pivot (AMP) TKR and compares it to kinematics of the normal knee. Methods: Thirteen patients with pre-operative diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis, who had undergone a knee replacement with the AMP knee at least one-year prior were recruited in this study. All had an excellent clinical outcome (as assessed by AKSS) and underwent fluoro-scopic analysis whilst performing a step up activity. Knee kinematics were assessed by analysing the movement of the femur relative to the tibia using the Patella Tendon Angle (PTA) through the range of knee flexion. This data was compared to that of thirteen normal knees. Results: The PTA for the normal knee has a linear relationship with knee flexion. The PTA is 14 degrees in full extension and decreases to -10 degrees at 100 degrees knee flexion during a step-up exercise. Between extension and 60 degrees of knee flexion, no significant difference was found between the PTA for the normal knee and for the AMP. The PTA for AMP is significantly higher for values of knee flexion exceeding 60 degrees. The standard deviation for different values of knee flex-ion is similar to that seen in the normal knee. Conclusions: In extension, the PTA is near normal but in flexion PTA is higher than normal suggesting that the femur is too anterior. The variability of the kinematics for AMP TKR is similar to that of the normal knee and is better than that of most other knee designs that we have studied in the past, indicating that it is a stable TKR

Introduction and Objective. Gait variability is the amplitude of the fluctuations in the time series with respect to the mean of kinematic (e.g., joint angles) or kinetic (e.g., joint moments) measurements. Although gait variability increases with normal ageing or pathological mechanisms, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose was to determine if a patient who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can reduce gait variability. Materials and Methods. Twenty-five patients awaiting TKA were randomly assigned to receive either medial pivot (MP, m=7/f=6, age=62.4±6.2 years) or posterior stabilized (PS, m=7/f=5, age=63.7±8.9 years) implants, and were compared to 13 controls (CTRL, m=7/f=6, age=63.9±4.3 years). All patients completed a gait analysis within one month prior and 12 months following surgery, CTRLs completed the protocol once. A waveform F-Test Method (WFM) was used to compare the variance in knee biomechanics variables at each interval of the gait cycle. Results. Preoperatively, the PS group had greater sagittal knee angle variability compared to the MP (32–58% gait cycle) and CTRL (21–53% gait cycle) groups. Postoperatively, no difference in sagittal knee angle variability existed between any of the groups. Preoperatively, sagittal knee moment variability was greater in the MP (2–39% gait cycle) and PS (5–19% and 42–57% gait cycle) groups compared to the CTRL. Postoperatively, sagittal knee moment was lower in the MP (49–55% gait cycle) and greater in the PS (23–36% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL. Knee power variability was greater preoperatively in the MP (52–61% gait cycle) and PS (52–62% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL. Postoperatively, knee power variability was lower in the MP (17–22% and 45–50% gait cycle) and PS (6–23%, 34–41% and 45–49% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL group. Conclusions. Preoperatively, knee OA patients have greater variability in knee moments than CTRLs during the transition from double-limb support to single-limb support on the affected limb. This indicates knee instability as patients are adopting a gait strategy that refers to knee muscle contraction avoidance. The MP group showed greater knee stability postoperatively as they had lower knee moment and power variability compared to the CTRL. The significance of having less variability than CTRLs is not well understood at this time. Future research on muscle activity is needed to determine if neuromuscular adaptations are causing these reductions in variability after TKA

Advance medial pivot total knee replacement has been designed to reflect contemporary data regarding knee kinematics. We report the clinical outcome of 284 replacements in 225 consecutive patients. All patients were prospectively followed for a mean of 7.6 years (5 to 9) using validated rating systems, both objective and subjective. All patients showed a statistically significant improvement (p~0.01) on the Knee Society clinical rating system, WOMAC questionnaire, SF-12 questionnaire, and Oxford knee score. The majority of patients (92%) were able to perform age appropriate activities with a mean knee flexion of 117° (85 to 135). Survival analysis showed a cumulative success rate of 99.1% (95% CI, 86.6 to 100) at five years and 97.5% (95% CI, 65.6 to 100) at seven years. Two (0.7%) replacements were revised due to aseptic loosening, one (0.35%) due to infection and one (0.35%) due to a traumatic dislocation. In only two (0.7%) replacements, progressive radiological lucent lines (combined with beta angle of 85°) were observed

BACKGROUND. The need for post-operative manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty is a frustrating complication that can lead to suboptimal outcomes if range-of-motion to a functional level is not regained. Implant morphology and kinematics, PCL imbalance, and soft-tissue balancing can all contribute to post-operative stiffness. Utilization of total knee arthroplasty components that replicate the native knee's medial ball and socket kinematics may lead to easier maintenance of flexion post-operatively compared to conventional components. PURPOSE. To determine if a medial pivot total knee arthroplasty design can reduce the need for post-operative MUA after primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS. A retrospective chart review of primary total knee arthroplasties performed between 2013 and 2016 by a single fellowship-trained joint replacement surgeon was performed. Cases that met criteria for inclusion were: primary total knee arthroplasty, identifiable implant based on operative report and/or post-operative radiographs, immediate post-operative passive flexion against gravity of at least 110 degrees, and availability of post-operative follow-up notes documenting range-of-motion that was either satisfactory or necessitating need for MUA. The need for a MUA was deemed necessary if post-operative flexion was not beyond 90 degrees within six weeks of surgery. The percentage of patients requiring MUA for a group implanted with the EVOLUTION Medial Pivot System was compared to a group implanted with all other designs (Stryker Triathlon CR, PS, TS). RESULTS. One hundred fifty-six cases met criteria for inclusion and were reviewed. The Triathlon system was used predominantly in the first half of the study period and accounted for 65 (42%) of the cases performed. Six patients in this group underwent MUA and two patients required repeated MUA. An additional patient in the Triathlon group met the criteria for MUA but had other conditions which prevented the investigators from performing it. The percentage of patients who met the indication for MUA in the Triathlon group was 10.8%. The EVOLUTION system was used predominantly in the second half of the study period and accounted for 91 (58%) of the cases performed. There were two patients (2.2%) who met criteria for MUA and both patients subsequently underwent MUA. There was a statistically significant reduction in the number of patients meeting criteria for MUA in the EVOLUTION group compared with the Triathlon group (p=0.024). CONCLUSION. Utilization of a medial ball and socket design for primary total knee arthroplasty allows the polyethylene implant to control the position of the femur on the tibia. This design possibly allows for improved early maintenance of post-operative flexion, which may minimize the need for post-operative MUA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

We compared the short term follow-up clinical and radiological results after PCL substituting (PS) Medial Pivot Knee and Nexgen. ®. LPS total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Seventy knees in 48 patients after TKA with PS ADVANCE. ®. Medial Pivot Knee (Group I) and sixty seven knees in 45 patients after TKA with Nexgen. ®. LPS (Group II) were evaluated retrospectively from March 2004 to May 2006. The mean follow up period was 31 months (range: 24–43 months) in group I and 32 month (range: 24–46 months) in group II. All the knees were operated by one surgeon. The evaluations included the preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), Knee society score (KSS), tibiofemoral angle, and postoperative complications. In group I, ROM increased from preoperative mean flexion contracture of 6.3° and further flexion of 116° to postoperative mean flexion contracture 1.9° and further flexion 121°, KS knee score increased from 46 to 87, KS function score increased from 37 to 83, and tibiofemoral angle changed from preoperative varus 4.0° to postoperative valgus 5.5°. In group II, ROM increased from preoperative mean flexion contracture of 13° and further flexion of 118° to postoperative mean flexion contracture 0.9° and further flexion 123°, KS knee score increased from 50 to 87, KS function score increased from 48 to 83, and tibiofemoral angle changed from preoperative varus 4.1° to postoperative valgus 5.3°. The complications were two periprosthetic patellar fracture and one failure of tibial component in group I, and one early failure of femoral component and one arthrofibrosis in group II. There was no statistical difference in radiological and clinical results between the two groups. Minimum 2-year follow-up result of PS Medial Pivot Knee TKA was comparable to that of Nexgen. ®. LPS TKA and longer term follow-up would be necessary

In order to emulate normal knee kinematics more closely and thereby potentially improve wear characteristics and implant longevity the Medial Pivot type knee replacement geometry was designed. In the current study the clinical and radiographic results of 50 consecutive knee replacements using a Medial Pivot type knee replacement are reported; results are compared to the Australian Orthopaedic Associations National Joint Replacement Registry. The patients' data were crossed checked against the registry to see if they had been revised elsewhere. After a mean follow-up of 9.96 years results show that the Medial Pivot Knee replacement provides good pain relief and functional improvement according to KSS and Womac scores and on subjective patient questionnaires. There was one minor revision; insertion of a patella button at 6.64 years FU. There were no major revisions; all implants appeared to be well fixed on standard radiographic examination. While the revision rate for the Medial Pivot knee according to the Australia Joint Registry results is higher compared to all other types of knee replacements in the registry, and to what is reported in the literature on the medial pivot knee, it is not in the current series. Revision rate was similar to what is reported on in the literature, but after a longer follow-up period. However, long term follow-up is required to draw definitive conclusions on the longevity of this type of implant

In order to eliminate the “conflict” that can occur with physiological roll back of the femur on the tibia, most modern knee arthroplasty prostheses are designed to have little conformity between the femoral and tibial surfaces. However, a consequence of this design is paradoxical anterior sliding of the femur on tibia, which can result in clinically significant gait abnormalities. Recent studies show that during movement of the knee, the medial side remains very nearly stable like a ball-in-socket joint, whilst the lateral side moves front to back, rotating around the centre of the medial side. A total knee joint prosthesis designed with these same kinematics may therefore be advantageous. The objective of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that the increased constraint of a medial pivot knee promotes earlier loosening of the prosthesis. METHODS: This was a retrospective radiographic cohort study. Using our unit’s knee arthroplasty database, all patients with a Freeman-Samuelson 1000 knee arthroplasty (medial pivot design) or a Freeman-Samuelson Modular knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were identified, and matched as closely as possible for age, length of follow-up and pre-operative diagnosis (Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis or Post-traumatic arthritis). This was a single surgeon series using a standard surgical approach with a posterior cruciate sacrificing technique. Standardised anteroposterior and lateral radiographs taken postoperatively, at 6 months, 1 year and then at yearly intervals, were examined systematically and independently of the senior surgeon (GS). Component migration and radiolucent line scores were allocated as recommended by the Knee Society. RESULTS: Group 1 (n=55),–Freeman Samuelson Modular design, mean age–70.3 years, mean length of follow-up–4.5 years. Group 2 (n=48),–Freeman Samuelson 1000 design (Medial pivot), mean age–70.4 years, mean length of follow-up–4.3 years. There were no failures in group 1. There was one failure requiring revision of the femoral component in group 2. Radiolucent lines were more prominent and frequent in the tibia, particularly under the medial and lateral plateau’s (KSS zone 1 and 6). There was no significant difference in the overall radiolucent line scores between the two groups (p=0.39, Mann Whitney U test). Similarly we found no difference between radiolucent line progression in the specific tibial zones (1–6 KSS system). Radiolucent lines in the femur were infrequent and insignificant. CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant difference between the two designs of knee prosthesis in terms of either total radiolucent line score or rate of radiolucent line progression. The increased constraint of the medial pivot knee prosthesis does not appear to result in an increased incidence of radiographic loosening

The purpose of this study was to compare lower limb muscle activity in patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a medial pivot (MP) implant to healthy controls (CTRL) during a stair ascent task. Seven MP (age: 61.4±6.5 years, BMI: 30.0±4.7 kg/m2, 12.4±3.8 months post-surgery) patients who underwent a TKA performed using either a subvastus or medial parapatellar approach were age- and BMI-matched to seven healthy CTRL participants (age: 62.4±4.2 years, BMI: 26.3±2.7 kg/m2) for comparison in this study. Participants underwent electromyography (EMG) analysis while completing a three-step stairs ascent task. Portable wireless surface EMG probes were placed on the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), biceps femoris (BF) and semimembranous (SM) muscles of both lower limbs. Peak linear envelope (peakLE) and total muscle activity (iEMG) were extrapolated and normalised to a maximal voluntary contraction. Nonparametric Kruskal Wallace ANOVA tests were used and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to identify where significant (p < 0.05) differences occurred. The operated limb had significantly lower iEMG in the VAL, RF and BF muscles, and significantly lower peakLE in the SM muscle compared to the non-operated limb. The operated-limb of the MP group had significantly lower iEMG in the VAL and BF muscles, and significantly lower peakLE in the VAL, RF and SM muscles compared to the CTRL group. The non-operated limb in the MP group had significantly larger peakLE and iEMG in the RF muscle compared to the CTRL group. Differences in muscle activity between the operated and non-operated limbs in TKA patients with a MP implant demonstrates a compensatory strategy to reduce loading on the operated limb by relying on the non-operated limb. This same strategy has been reported in other studies investigating other functional tasks. This reliance on the non-operated limb resulted by having greater peakLE and iEMG in the RF muscle compared to the healthy CTRLs. These differences between limbs could also result from many years of muscle adaptation waiting to receive a knee replacement. In conclusion, TKA patients exhibit discrepancies in muscle activity compared to healthy knees and differences between operated and non-operated limbs. Post-surgery rehabilitation should rely on unilateral strength exercises of the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles to reduce discrepancies to allow for a more balanced muscle activity between limbs

The purpose of this study was to compare lower limb joint mechanics in patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either a posterior stabilised (PS) or with a medial pivot (MP) implant to healthy controls (CTRL) during stair ascent and descent tasks. Six PS (age: 67.2±1.5 years, BMI: 31.0±3.2 kg/m2) and 11 MP (age: 62.3±6.0 years, BMI: 29.7±3.9 kg/m2) TKA patients matched to 10 healthy CTRL participants (age: 65.6±5.5 years, BMI: 27.2±5.0 kg/m2) were included in the study. TKA patients went through 3D motion analysis after unilateral TKA with either a MP (11.7±3.4 months post-surgery) or PS (10.1±3.4 months post-surgery) implant performed using either a subvastus or medial parapatellar approach. Kinematic and kinetic data was collected using a 10-camera Vicon and two portable Kistler force plates placed on the first and second stair of a three-step staircase. Nonparametric Kruskal Wallace ANOVA tests were used and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to identify where significant (p < 0.05) differences occurred. When comparing both stair tasks, stair ascent showed a larger number of significant differences in kinematic and kinetic variables than stair descent. Peak knee extension was significantly (p < 0.05) greater in both TKA groups compared to the CTRL during stair descent, whereas only the PS group had significantly (p = 0.02) greater knee extension angle than the CTRL during stair ascent. The PS group had a significantly (p = 0.01) lower peak knee extension moment than the CTRL group during both tasks and compared to the MP group during stairs ascent. During stair ascent, the MP group had significantly (p = 0.02) larger peak hip extension moments than both PS and CTRL group. Greater knee extension angles in TKA groups at foot strike during stair tasks support the notion that TKA groups exhibit stiff knee during stance to reduce or avoid shear displacement on the operated knee. This could also result from many years of muscle adaptation waiting to receive a knee replacement. Reduced peak knee extension moment in the PS group during stairs tasks showed a quadriceps deficiency that could increase the risk of revision or of other joint replacement on the contralateral side or ipsilateral hip. MP group reproduced similar joint loading patterns as the CTRLs which may reduce their risk of revision. In conclusion, TKA patients continue to exhibit discrepancies from healthy knee mechanics during stair ascent and descent. Further research examining muscle function especially during stair ascent is warranted