DOES THE INCREASED CONSTRAINT OF A MEDIAL PIVOT KNEE PROSTHESIS INCREASE ITS LIKELIHOOD OF LOOSENING?

Abstract

In order to eliminate the “conflict” that can occur with physiological roll back of the femur on the tibia, most modern knee arthroplasty prostheses are designed to have little conformity between the femoral and tibial surfaces. However, a consequence of this design is paradoxical anterior sliding of the femur on tibia, which can result in clinically significant gait abnormalities. Recent studies show that during movement of the knee, the medial side remains very nearly stable like a ball-in-socket joint, whilst the lateral side moves front to back, rotating around the centre of the medial side. A total knee joint prosthesis designed with these same kinematics may therefore be advantageous. The objective of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that the increased constraint of a medial pivot knee promotes earlier loosening of the prosthesis.

METHODS: This was a retrospective radiographic cohort study. Using our unit’s knee arthroplasty database, all patients with a Freeman-Samuelson 1000 knee arthroplasty (medial pivot design) or a Freeman-Samuelson Modular knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were identified, and matched as closely as possible for age, length of follow-up and pre-operative diagnosis (Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis or Post-traumatic arthritis). This was a single surgeon series using a standard surgical approach with a posterior cruciate sacrificing technique. Standardised anteroposterior and lateral radiographs taken postoperatively, at 6 months, 1 year and then at yearly intervals, were examined systematically and independently of the senior surgeon (GS). Component migration and radiolucent line scores were allocated as recommended by the Knee Society.

RESULTS: Group 1 (n=55),–Freeman Samuelson Modular design, mean age–70.3 years, mean length of follow-up–4.5 years. Group 2 (n=48),–Freeman Samuelson 1000 design (Medial pivot), mean age–70.4 years, mean length of follow-up–4.3 years. There were no failures in group 1. There was one failure requiring revision of the femoral component in group 2. Radiolucent lines were more prominent and frequent in the tibia, particularly under the medial and lateral plateau’s (KSS zone 1 and 6). There was no significant difference in the overall radiolucent line scores between the two groups (p=0.39, Mann Whitney U test). Similarly we found no difference between radiolucent line progression in the specific tibial zones (1–6 KSS system). Radiolucent lines in the femur were infrequent and insignificant.

CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant difference between the two designs of knee prosthesis in terms of either total radiolucent line score or rate of radiolucent line progression. The increased constraint of the medial pivot knee prosthesis does not appear to result in an increased incidence of radiographic loosening.