Purpose of the study: To establish the difference between AO plate osteosynthesis and Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing and the long-term outcome. Design: Prospective randomised study. Material: During 2000 and 2002 prospective randomised study was carried out where children with diaphysial fracture of long bone was either treated with osteosynthesis with AO plate or ESIN. 32 children had AO plate osteosynthesis and 34 children had ESIN procedure. Methods: In our series of patients managed with ESIN Nailing 24 had forearm fracture 6 had femur fracture 2 had humeral and 2 had tibial fracture. The other group with AO plate osteosynthesis had 25-forearm fracture 1 humeral fracture 4 tibial fractures and 2 femoral fractures. Results: The group treated with AO plate osteosynthesis 2 had rotational deformity and rest did well. The recovery period after removal of metal work was longer. The group treated with ESIN procedure 1 patient fell down and bend the C-Nail, which was straightened in situ, and the fracture healed with slight curvature of the femur, which corrected slowly with growth. The forearm fractures did not have any rotational deformity. The recovery period post removal of the ESIN was very short. Conclusion: We find that ESIN is a superior procedure for diaphysial fractures of long bone in children and AO plating should only be done in cases where ESIN is not possible

Aims. To evaluate the results of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN) for displaced, unstable paediatric forearm diaphyseal fractures. Method. A retrospective, consecutive series study of 60 patients treated with ESIN between February 1996 and July 2005. Results. There were 43 (72%) boys and 17 (28%) girls with median age of 11.5 years (range: 2.6-15.9). 54 (90%) patients had a closed injury and 6 (10%) sustained a Grade I open injury. Seven patients had an isolated radius fracture. 49 (82%) fractures were stabilised with both bone ESIN, 10 (16%) with radial and one with isolated ulnar ESIN by standard technique under tourniquet control. All but two patients were protected with an above elbow cast. Thirty-six cases (60%) were primary procedures and 24 (40%) were performed due to re-displacement following a MUA. 36 patients (60%) required a minimal open reduction. Average hospital stay was 1.8 days (1-8 days). Average length of immobilisation was 5.4 weeks (3-9 weeks). Average time for clinical fracture union was 5.7 weeks (3-13 weeks). ESIN were removed after mean period of 33.8 weeks (approx: 7.9 months). One patient had a forearm compartment syndrome and required formal fasciotomy. One patient had ulnar delayed union and one had ulnar non-union. Five patients had transient superficial radial nerve neuropraxia. Ten had soft tissue irritation leading to early nail removal in two patients and two had superficial wound infection. Three patients sustained a re-fracture with the nail in situ following a new injury. 53 (88%) patients had full elbow and wrist movements on discharge. Seven patients had restriction of forearm rotations of less than 15°. Conclusion. Good clinical outcome, transitory and modest complications; quick and safe nail removal; and better cosmesis compared to plating makes ESIN an attractive treatment option for displaced, unstable paediatric forearm diaphyseal fractures

Aim. The purpose of this study was to quantify the number of children treated with ESIN (elastic stable intra-medullary nails) at our institution and to determine what proportion of these nails have been removed and the time and difficulty taken to do so. Methods. Patients treated with ESIN between 2000 and 2005 were identified by database search. Their notes were reviewed to record patient and initial nailing details, and timing, difficulty and length of metalwork removal procedures. Complications leading to premature removal or following nail extraction were noted. Results. Eighty-seven patients were identified who fitted our study criteria (68% male, 32% female). Mean age was 10.9 years (4.7–15.9 years). Twelve of the procedures were for open fractures. Seventy-nine patients underwent nail removal at our institution. Four were followed up elsewhere and a decision to leave the nails in was made in another four patients (usually underlying bone pathology). Four patients had surgery earlier than planned to deal with implant problems: 3 to address prominent nails and 1 for re-fracture. The nails were removed at a mean of 8 months after insertion. Mean time taken to remove the metalwork was 25 minutes (10 to 75 minutes). Eight of the 79 removal procedures were graded as difficult, with one being extremely difficult: this was not predictable from pre-operative radiographs. There were 2 complications following metalwork removal. One was a re-fracture through a unicortical bone cyst 2 years after removal, which was successfully treated with ESIN again. The other was a superficial wound infection, which settled with antibiotics. Conclusion. It is routine policy at our institution to remove ESIN after fracture healing, but it should be noted that removal procedures can be difficult and lengthy. There is, however, a low complication rate following removal, and routine follow-up may not be necessary

Aim: A retrospective study to analyse the treatment of paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures over the preceding 6 years and to assess if there was any difference in outcome between plate and elastic stable intra-medullary nailing (ESIN). Material and Methods: Between January 1997 and December 2002, 144 unstable fractures required surgical fixation. 59 patients were treated with both-bone plate fixation, 55 patients were treated with single-bone plate fixation and 30 patients were treated with ESIN. The mean age of surgery was approximately 12 with peaks at age 8 and 13 years. In the plate group, 70% to 80% were undertaken by the SpRs and in the nailing group, approximately 50% were undertaken by staff grades; 30% by Consultants and 20% by SpRs. Results: Between each group there was no difference in time spent in plaster, clinic attendance, time to clinical union and time to restoration of normal movements. On radiographic reviews, single-bone plate fixation patients united quicker than the both-bone plate fixation or ESIN groups. Average anaesthetic times became more prolonged from single-bone to ESIN to both-bone plate fixation. Compound fractures were approximately 10% in both groups. There were hyper-trophic scars in approximately 10% in the plate group and 3% in the nail group. There were 3 compartment syndromes in the plate group and 2 compartment syndromes in the nail group. In the plating groups, there was a higher rate of peri-prosthetic fracture, mal-union, hyper-trophic scarring, infection and neuro-vascular complications. Conclusion: ESIN is superior to plating in relation to surgical complications. It is therefore recommended that elastic stable intra-medullary nailing should be used for displaced paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures

Aims: The purpose of our study was to assess the decrease in hospital stay in children femur fractures after introducing Prevotñs Intramedulary Semißexible Titanium rod þxation (ESIN) in 1993. Methods: In our population there are 335 children treated for femur fracture at our institution in years 1990–2001. Their age ranged from 10 days to 14 years (average 6.3 years), 70.8% male, 29.2% female. The majority of fractures were unilateral (47.7% right, 50.9% left) and 1.4% bilateral. Up to 1993 femur fractures were treated mostly by traction immobilization (43.5%) and DC plates (34.8%). The average hospital stay was 26.6 days. In 1993 we introduced and since then used ESIN to treat roughly 3/5 of all femur fractures (112 cases in 8 years). Children were usualy dissmissed 7–10 days after the operation and the rods removed after 4 months (average 118 days) with follow-up one week after removal. Results: The average hospital stay after ESIN was 10.0 days and 26.6 days following other treatment modalities. There is a statistically signiþcant diferrence (p < 0.001) between the two groups. Conclusions: After introduction of ESIN in 1993 there was a dramatic decrease in hospital stay

For a long time treatment of all forarm fractures was coservatively in principle. Retrospective analysis of more than 1000 fractures showed that 97,8% were treated orthopedically, 22% finished consolidation with an axial malalignment of more than 10∞ and 6,9% showed bad functional results 3–13 years later. Most bad results were found in shaft fractures of both bones on the same level or in oblique fractures with convergent displacement. The introduction of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) gave the opportunity to stabilize instable diaphy-seal fractures with less [Aufwand], with an implant adequate for children and with the possibility of immediate postoperative movement. Within three years, 161 diaphy-seal forearm fractures were managed by cast (27%), reduction (32%) or osteosynthesis (41%). In 14 cases (8,7%), secondary osteosynthesis took place because of secondary or re-displacement during orthopedic treatment. The functional results following ESIN are very good. In radial neck fractures with severe displacement of more than 60° an open reduction and fixation by K-wires was the preferred method for a long time. After open reduction, radial head necrosis was the result in a significant part of cases independent of the quality of reduction. Closed reduction with the tip of the nail without touching the fracture region improved the results extremely. Seldom a transcapsular reduction manoever is necessary. In a multicentric study of proximal radius fractures including 67 cases, 27 fractures with a relevant displacement were managed surgically (24 ESIN, 3 K-wire). 3 [Verplumpung] of the radial head, two of them combined with premature closure of epiphyseal plate, and one radial head necrosis took place, but only in one case with ESIN, whereas all cases with open reduction and K-wire use showed problems during the healing course

Introduction: The majority of forearm fractures in children can be managed with a plaster cast alone and manipulation under anaesthetic as required. A small number of cases however require surgical intervention. A variety of methods are available but the use of elastic intramedullary nails is becoming the technique of choice. Method: We present a two-centre study assessing the outcome of either Elastic StabJe Intramedullary Nails (ESIN) or Kirschner wires as the method of fracture stabilisation in diaphyseal forearm fractures of the radius and ulna. Results: ESIN group: 24 children underwent ESIN fixation. There were 22 boys and 2 girls, mean age 9.4 years (1.4–15.2 years, p=O.ll). Indications for stabilisation included 21 cases for fracture instability (immediate or delayed,) 2 irreducible fractures and 1 open fracture. 14 children underwent surgery on the day they sustained their fracture. The remainder were operated on an average 6.5 days following injury (1–14 days). In the K wire group: 36 children underwent K-wires fixation with 2.5mrn wires. There were 21 boys and 15 girls, mean age 10.6 years (2.2–15.5 years). Indication for stabilisation included 22 cases for fracture instability , 6 irreducible fractures and 8 open fractures. 32 children underwent surgery on the day they sustained their fracture. The remaining 4 patients were operated on the following day. Conclusions: All fractures united with no resultant subjective disability. The complication rate following K-wires was 16% and that following nail fixation 9%. Loss of forearm rotation was documented in 4 children in the K-wire group and 3 children stabilised with nails. These results confirm an excellent outcome following intramedullary fixation. We have demonstrated no difference in outcome between K-wires and ESIN, although the elastic nails do offer some theoretical advantages

Introduction ESIN is an established method of treatment of long bone fractures in children, which has been in regular use in our institution since 1996. We report on our 7-year experience of using ESIN for the treatment of long bone fractures in children. Method 92 fractures were nailed (26 femoral, 12 tibial, 17 humeral and 37 forearm). The average age was 12 years (7–15) and average follow-up 15 months. Main indications included unstable and severely displaced fractures, failure of conservative treatment and polytrauma or head injury. Data collection included mechanism of injury, fracture configuration, treatment delay, operation time and technique, length of hospital stay, rehabilitation, healing, nail removal and complications. Results 49% of fractures were caused by road traffic accidents. All were diaphyseal apart from 14 proximal humeral fractures. The average surgery delay was 7 days and operation time 78 minutes. Open reduction was performed in 3 femoral, 1 humeral and 18 forearm fractures. Single nailing was used for the proximal humeral and forearm fracture. The average hospital stay was 5.8 days, ranging from 12 days for femoral to 2 days for forearm fractures. Clinical healing was achieved at 3.5, 4.3, 2.4 and 2.1 months respectively for femoral, tibial, humeral and forearm fractures. The commonest complication (25%) was skiin irritation around the entry site, which invariably resolved after implant removal. Delayed union occurred in 2 femoral and 2 tibial fractures (all healed following bone marrow injection). 2 tibial fractures mal-united and 1 tibial fracture was complicated with compartment syndrome. The average nail removal time was 9 months. The nails could not be removed in 4 cases. Conclusion ESIN is minimally invasive and has a low complication rate. It avoids the lengthy immobilization of conservative treatment, and the surgical trauma of plating without the association of refractures or nerve damage. We believe it represents a valid option in the treatment of long bone fractures

Introduction Most proximal humeral fractures are treated conservatively. However, treatment for the severely displaced fractures (Neer’s grade IV) is more challenging. This is especially in the adolescent age group where the remodelling potential is reduced. We report on our 8-year experience of fixing severely displaced proximal humeral fractures in children using ESIN. Method Between 1996 and 2003, we treated 14 children (7 metaphyseal and 7 epiphyseal fractures) using ESIN. 11 were completely displaced and 12 were caused by high energy forces. Our indications included unstable fracture with severe displacement (> 2/3 shaft diameter), age above 12 years and multiple injuries/polytrauma. Manipulation of the fractures and the operative technique is described. Post-operatively, the arm is kept in a sling for 2 weeks. All patients were reviewed on a monthly basis until clinical and radiological healing. Following the removal of the nails, the patients are only discharged when they demonstrate full pain-free range of movement. Results The double nail technique was used in the first 2 cases and a single nail was used for the subsequent 12 cases. The fracture was reduced by open technique in 1 case. In another, the nail was inserted antegrade. Time from injury to surgery was 2.4 days. The mean operation time was 65 minutes and hospital stay 2.1 days. Time to clinical healing (complete pain-free range of movement) was 2.4 months and radiological healing 3.2 months. All nails were removed by 6 months. Shoulder and elbow range of movement returned to normal at 3.5 and 3.2 months. Complications included 4 cases of elbow stiffness due to nail prominence and 1 case of nail breakage during removal. 1 patient had 10 degrees of varus and in 2 other patients, 5 degrees of varus and 1 cm of shortening and 1.5 cm of shortening respectively. At the final follow-up (14.6 months), all patients had symptom free full range of movement. Conclusion ESIN is a valid treatment for the severely displaced proximal humeral fractures in the adolescence. It avoids lengthy and awkward immobilization and allows early post-operative mobilization. The single nail technique proved to be adequate to maintain alignment and allow fracture healing, keeping the invasiveness of the procedure to a minimum

Displaced fractures of the radial neck in children can lead to limitation of elbow and forearm movements if left untreated. Several management techniques are available for the treatment of radial neck fractures in children. Open reduction can disturb the blood supply of the soft tissue surrounding the radial head epiphysis and is associated with more complications. We report our experience of treating 14 children between the age of 4 and 13 years, who had severely displaced radial neck fractures (Judet type 111 and 1V). 12 patients were treated with indirect reduction and fixation using the Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nail (ESIN) technique, (3 with assisted percutaneous K-wire reduction) and 2 had open reduction followed by ESIN fixation of the radial head fragment. This method reduces the need for open reduction and thus the complication rate. Three patients had associated fractures of the same forearm which was also treated surgically at the same time. We routinely immobilised the forearm for two weeks and removed the nail in all cases in an average of 12 weeks. We had no complication with implant removal. All 14 patients have been followed up for average of 28 months. One patient (7%) developed asymptomatic avascular necrosis (AVN) of the head of radius. Thirteen patients (93%) had excellent result on final review. One patient had neuropraxia of the posterior interosseous nerve which recovered within 6 weeks. In conclusion we advocate ESIN for the closed reduction and fixation of severely displaced radial neck fractures in children. It remains a useful fixation method even if open reduction is required and allows early mobilisation

The fractures of the humerus shaft and of the proximal humerus in childhood turn off less than 1% of all fractures. Healing is unproblematic, according the literature the non operative treatment is the treatment of choice. Under the influence of the ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing) the readiness to operate children’s fractures has changed completely. The reasons for it are multiple. According to this trend, also is to recognize a change in the treatment of the humeral fractures in childhood obviously. The presentation on hand shall show the reasons of this paradigm change more nearly. The classic indications for the operative therapy of humeral fractures were: 3∞ open fractures, comminuted fractures, secondary complications. We have asked whether, today, this concept is still valid in Europe. The tendency towards more operative treatment becomes apparent in the documentation of children’s fractures that has started by the international working group for children’s trauma in collaboration with the AO – Doc in 1991. We think every unstable humerus fracture should be stabilized today. We posit in the rest, that if a general anaesthesia for reduction of humeral fracture is indicated, we aim at a definitive, stable and save fixation, i.e. potentially unstable fractures should be reduced in the OR. In our hands and relying on our experience we prefer to stabilize humeral fractures with ESIN

Introduction. Clavicle fractures accounting for 3–5% of all adult fractures are usually treated non-operatively. There is an increasing trend towards their surgical fixation. Objective. The aim of our study was to investigate the outcome following titanium elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for midshaft non-comminuted clavicle fractures with >20mm shortening/displacement. Methods. 38 patients, which met inclusion criteria, were reviewed retrospectively. There were 32 males and 6 females. The mean age was 27.6 years. The patients were assessed for clinical/radiological union and by Oxford Shoulder and QuickDASH scores. 71% patients required open reduction. Results. 100% union was achieved at average of 11.3 weeks. The average follow-up was 12 months. The average Oxford Shoulder and QuickDASH scores were 45.6 and 6.7 respectively. 47% patients had nail removal. One patient had lateral nail protrusion while other required its medial trimming. Conclusion. In our hands, ESIN is safe and minimally invasive with good patient satisfaction, cosmetic appearance and overall outcome

Aims: To compare the cost of intra-medullary implants used stabilising paediatric diaphyseal fractures with the clinical outcome. Methods: Between March 1994 and August 2001, at two centres, The Womenñs and Childrenñs Hospital, Adelaide, Australia and The Royal London Hospital, London UK 60 children were surgically treated for diaphyseal forearm fractures using Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails (ESIN) or 2.5mm Kirschner wires. Having established no difference in the clinical outcome or subjective disability of either technique we compared the implant cost directly. Results: The two treatments both resulted in an excellent outcome with all fractures leading to union with no subjective disability. The Kirscner wires cost £3.00 per wire while the ESI Nails cost between £57.50 and £ 113.30 per wire, depending on the dimensions. Conclusions: We were not able to demonstrate any difference in outcome between ESIN and K-Wiring, although the nails do offer theoretical advantages. The cost implications of using the special implant are twenty fold or more, and as the pressures of cost cutting grow, we wonder if theoretical advantage is Òvalue for moneyÒ

To evaluate the efficacy of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for the treatment of forearm fractures in children and adolescents. Between June 2002 and August 2007, 28 patients (19 boys – 9 girls) with 28 forearm fractures were treated with ESIN in our department. The mean age was 12.88 years (range 10.9–4.82). Both forearm bones were affected in all cases. 13 patients were treated by intra-medullary splinting immediate after the accident whilst 15 children were operated after failure of conservative treatment and fracture redisplacement. The radius was nailed in a retrograde fashion in all cases. On the other hand antegrade nailing of the ulna was performed in 18 cases whilst retrograde nailing in 5 patients. In 8 cases closed reduction was possible whilst a small incision at the fracture site was necessary in 20 children. In all cases an above-elbow cast was applied for 5 – 6 weeks postoperatively. The healing process was determined on the basis of two-projection radiographs. At the latest follow-up elbow and forearm motion were also assessed. Mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 7 – 28). With the exception of one case all fractures healed within 9 weeks. No case of infection, cross-union or non-union occurred. At the latest follow-up all children presented with complete restoration of elbow movement but three of them had a deficit of pronation of 15–20 degrees. In those cases where an open reduction was required the results were the same as in other cases. Based on our results, retrograde, of both bones, nailing is recommended for the treatment of all displaced forearm fractures in children older than 7 years-old. Proper preoperative curving of the nails offers increased stability maintaining the anatomic relation of the forearm bones

We evaluated the outcomes of fractures of the femoral shaft treated by elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN). From 1994 to 1999, 100 children were treated. The mean age of the 65 boys and 35 girls was 8.7 years. The mean follow-up was 5.4 years. There were 30 type-AII fractures, 21 type-AIII, 17 type-AI, 13 type-BI, nine type-BII, four type-BIII and six type-CI. Implants were inserted using the ascending method in 92 patients and the descending method in eight. The mean period of implant insertion was 172 days. Steel implants (Medin) were used in 54 patients and titanium implants (Synthes) in 46. Evaluated according to Flynn, 86 patients had an excellent outcome, 13 a satisfactory outcome and one a poor outcome. The greatest limb length discrepancy was 3.2 cm. A steel implant was used in eight of the 13 patients whose results were merely satisfactory and in the patient who had a poor outcome. There were no pyogenic complications. In five patients, the inserted implant required shortening during treatment. We believe that in 5 to 12-year-old patients the ESIN method with titanium implants can be used to treat femoral shaft fractures

Directly molding IB, MG and AGC UHMWPE tibial inserts has provided excellent clinical performance. This performance may be related to the oxidation resistance and higher fracture toughness provided by the direct molding process. Directly molded UHMWPE components have been reported not to oxidize after either nine years post irradiation aging on the shelf or after 11 years of implantation. Retrievals show that molded IB inserts to have lower oxidation, better polyethylene quality and less surface damage than machined IB II inserts. However, the IB, MG and AGC products were directly molded from 1900 UHMWPE resin which is no longer available. The question remains if directly molding resins other than 1900 in a contemporary modular design will provide the same benefits. We report here on the first knee simulation wear of a contemporary total knee system comprised of a directly molded 1020 esin tibial insert. This result will be compared to the knee simulation result of an IBII machined from 4150 extruded ro 4 Optetrak tibial inserts made by directly molding 1020 resin were tested on a 4 station Instron/Stanmore simulator at 1.4 Hz with a 2279 N maximum load and right knee kinematics. The lubricant was bovine calf serum with EDTA and sodium azide. Axial loads were applied from 0 to 40& #778; flexion and internal/external rotation was −3/+6 degrees. Location, type and area of surface damage, were evaluated every 1 million cycles (Mc). The wear rate of the directly molded inserts was 6X less than reported for machined IB II inserts (2 vs 12 mg/million cycles respectively). There were no signs of delamination or pitting with either design. The more conforming Optetrak provided 52% reduction in wear area over the IB II (21 vs 32 % respectively). This demonstrates that resins other than 1900 may be directly molded in a contemporary and provide the same historical advantages

Aims

To determine the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaediatric admissions and fracture clinics within a regional integrated care system (ICS).

The December 2015 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Paediatric femoral fractures: a single incision nailing?; Lateral condylar fractures: open or percutaneous?;

Forearm refracture: the risks; Tibial spine fractures; The child’s knee in MRI; The mechanics of SUFE; Idiopathic clubfoot

The August 2015 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Clavicular fractures are being fixed – but how?; Propionibacterium acnes: a pain in the shoulder?; Bacteria, armpits and arthroplasty; Living longer, but unhappy: the woes of shoulder arthroplasty in the under 50s; Recurrent dislocations in the adolescent population; Splinting for elbow stiffness; Revision Bankart repair