O2205 THE COST IMPLICATIONS OF NEW SPECIALISED IMPLANT TECHNOLOGY IN SURGICALLY TREATING PAEDIATRIC FOREARM FRACTURES. ARE K-WIRES TOO CHEAP?

Abstract

Aims: To compare the cost of intra-medullary implants used stabilising paediatric diaphyseal fractures with the clinical outcome. Methods: Between March 1994 and August 2001, at two centres, The Womenñs and Childrenñs Hospital, Adelaide, Australia and The Royal London Hospital, London UK 60 children were surgically treated for diaphyseal forearm fractures using Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails (ESIN) or 2.5mm Kirschner wires. Having established no difference in the clinical outcome or subjective disability of either technique we compared the implant cost directly. Results: The two treatments both resulted in an excellent outcome with all fractures leading to union with no subjective disability. The Kirscner wires cost £3.00 per wire while the ESI Nails cost between £57.50 and £ 113.30 per wire, depending on the dimensions. Conclusions: We were not able to demonstrate any difference in outcome between ESIN and K-Wiring, although the nails do offer theoretical advantages. The cost implications of using the special implant are twenty fold or more, and as the pressures of cost cutting grow, we wonder if theoretical advantage is Òvalue for moneyÒ.