Aims

To compare the in vivo long-term fixation achieved by two acetabular components with different porous ingrowth surfaces using radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

Introduction

The effectiveness of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Multiple studies have been published that reveal conflicting results on the effectiveness of PSI, but no study has analyzed the contact kinematics within knee joints replaced with the use of PSI. Since a departure from normal kinematics can lead to eccentric loading, premature wear, and component loosening, studying the kinematics in patients who have undergone TKA with PSI can provide valuable insight on the ability of PSI to improve functionality and increase longevity. The goal of the present study was to compare femoral and tibial component migration (predictive of long-term loosening and revision) and contact kinematics following TKA using conventional instruments (CI) and PSI based surgical techniques.

Purpose

The success of total knee replacement (TKR) surgery can be attributed to improvements in TKR design, instrumentation, and surgical technique. Over a decade ago oxidized zirconium (OxZr) femoral components were introduced as an alternative bearing surface to cobalt-chromium (CoCr), based on strong in-vitro evidence, to improve the longevity of TKR implants. Early reports have demonstrated the clinical success of this material however no long-term comparative studies have demonstrated the superiority of OxZr implants compared to a more traditional CoCr implant. This study aims to compare long-term survivorship and outcomes in OxZr and CoCr femoral components in a single total knee design.

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus nonoperative management (NM) in non-obese (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (25–29.9), obese (30–34.9), severely-obese (35–39.9), morbidly-obese (40–49.9), and super-obese (50+) patients.

Introduction

As new innovations are developed to improve the longevity of joint replacement components, preclinical testing is necessary in the early stages of research into areas such as osseointegration, metal-cartilage wear and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Large-animal studies that test load-bearing components are expensive, however, requiring that animals be housed in special facilities that are not available at all institutions. Comparably, small animal models, such as the rat, offer several advantages including lower cost. Load-bearing implants remain difficult to manufacture via traditional methods in the sizes required for small-animal testing. Recent advances in additive manufacturing (3D metal-printing) have allowed for the creation of miniature joint replacement components in a variety of medical-grade metal alloys. The objective of this work is to create and optimize an image-based 3D-printed rat hip implant system that will allow in vivo testing of functional implant properties in a rat model.

Purpose

Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty has been a debated topic for decades. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship and clinical outcomes of a large primary total knee arthroplasty versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty cohort.

Purpose

The pros and cons of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty has been a long debated topic. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical times, blood loss and transfusion requirements between anesthetic types in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty.

Purpose

The patella provides a mechanical advantage to the knee extensor mechanism. Patellectomy, performed for trauma or patellofemoral arthrosis, does not preclude the development of tibiofemoral arthrosis. Total knee arthroplasty is the mainstay of treatment for tibiofemoral arthrosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of total knee arthoplasty in patients who previously underwent patellectomy.

Purpose: The range of motion after TKA depends on many patient, surgical technique, and implant factors. Recently, high-flexion designs have been introduced as a means of ensuring or gaining flexion after TKA. We therefore evaluated factors affecting postoperative flexion to determine whether implant design influences long-term flexion.

Method: We prospectively collected data on patients receiving a primary Genesis II total knee replacement with a minimum of 1-year followup (mean, 5.4 years; range, 1–13 years). We recorded pre – and postoperative outcome measures, patient demographics, and implant design (cruciate retaining [CR, n = 160], posterior stabilized [PS, n = 1177], high-flex posterior stabilized [HF-PS, n = 197]).

Results: Backward stepwise linear regression modeling revealed the following factors that significantly affected postoperative flexion: preoperative flexion, gender, body mass index, and implant design. Independent of gender, body mass index, and preoperative flexion, patients who received a HF-PS and PS design implant resulted in 8° and 5° more flexion, respectively, than those who received a CR implant. Based on analysis examining pre-operative flexion categories, patients with low flexion preoperatively (< 100°) were more likely to gain flexion, whereas those with high flexion preoperatively (> 120°) were most likely to maintain or lose flexion postoperatively. Controlling for implant design, patients with high flexion preoperatively (> 120°) were more likely to gain flexion with the HF-PS design implant (HF-PS = 32.0%; PS = 15.1%; CR = 4.5%).

Conclusion: In summary, our data demonstrate postoperative range of motion after TKA is related to several factors, confirming the important role of the patient’s preoperative range of motion. In addition, our review suggests knee design and, in particular, the use of a so called “high-flexion” PS polyethylene design may be advantageous in maintaining or improving flexion postoperatively, especially in those patients with good pre-operative range of motion.

Purpose: Efforts to decrease polyethylene wear have lead to advances in polyethylene and counter-face technology for total hip replacement. In particular, the use of highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) and more recently, oxidized zirconium (Oxinium) heads, have demonstrated significant in-vitro improvements in THR wear. This study reports on the early clinical performance and wear (measured with RSA) of an randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing Oxinium and CoCr heads on XLPE and conventional polyethylene (CPE).

Method: Forty patients were enrolled in a RCT and stratified to receive either an Oxinium (Ox) or CoCr head against either XLPE or CPE (ie 10 patients in each group). All patients had otherwise identical THRs and had tantalum beads inserted in the pelvis and polyethylene for wear analysis. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to patient demographics and the average age was 68 years (range 57–76) at index procedure. RSA wear analysis was performed immediately post-op, at six weeks, three and six months and then at one and two years. All patients are a minimum of four years post-op (average 4.6, range 4 – 5.8). Patients were followed prospectively using validated clinical outcome scores (WOMAC, SF-12, Harris Hip scores) and radiographs.

Results: All health-related outcomes were significantly improved from pre-operative with a mean Harris Hip score and WOMAC at last follow-up of 90.9 and 80.2, respectively. Total 3D femoral head penetration at two years for each group were the following: CoCrXLPE (0.068±0.029mm); OxXLPE (0.115±0.038mm); CoCrCPE (0.187±0.079mm); and OxCPE (0.242±0.088mm). Thus, OxCPE was significantly higher than OxXLPE and CoCrXLPE but not CoCrCPE (p=0.001, p> 0.0001 and p=0.094, respectively). In other words, head penetration was higher with CPE compared to XLPE but there was no significant difference between Ox and CoCr heads. Similarily, regardless of head type (ie combining similar poly types), there was a significant difference in 3D head penetration at two years between CPE and XLPE ( CPE 0.213±0.086; XLPE 0.093±0.041, p> 0.0001).

Conclusion: The early results of this RCT, using RSA as the wear analysis tool, indicate a significant improvement in wear with XLPE compared to CPE. However, it failed to show a clear advantage to the use of Oxinium over CoCr against either polyethylene. Longer follow-up is required to determine steady-state wear rates (after bedding-in) and allow comparison between bearing groups.

Purpose: This study develops and validates a technique to quantify polyethylene wear in tibial inserts using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), a nondestructive high resolution imaging technique that provides detailed images of surface geometry in addition to volumetric measurements.

Method: Six unworn and six wear-simulated Anatomic Modular Knee (DePuy Inc, Warsaw, IN) tibial inserts were evaluated. Each insert was scanned three times using micro-CT at a resolution of 50 μm. The insert surface was reconstructed for each scan through automatic segmentation and the insert volume was calculated. Gravimetric analysis was also performed for all inserts, and the micro-CT and gravimetric volumes were compared to determine accuracy. The utility of surface deviation maps derived from micro-CT was demonstrated by co-registering a worn and unworn insert. 3D deviations were measured continuously across the entire insert surface, including the articular and backside surfaces.

Results: The mean percent volume difference between the micro-CT and gravimetric techniques was 0.04% for the unworn inserts and 0.03% for the worn inserts. No significant difference was found between the micro-CT and gravimetric volumes for the unworn or worn inserts (P = 0.237 and P = 0.135, respectively). The mean coefficient of variation for volume between scans was 0.07% for both unworn and worn inserts. The map of surface deviations between the worn and unworn insert revealed focal deviations exceeding 750 μm due to wear.

Conclusion: Micro-CT provides precise and accurate volumetric measurements of polyethylene tibial inserts. Quantifiable 3D articular and backside surface deviation maps can be created from the detailed geometry provided by the technique. Compared to coordinate mapping, micro-CT provides 10 times greater surface sampling resolution (50 μm vs 500 μm) across the entire insert surface. Micro-CT is a useful analysis tool for wear simulator and retrieval studies of the polyethylene components used in total knee replacement.

Purpose: A ceramic head coupled to a metal liner is a proposed new alternate bearing in THA. The authors participated in an FDA approved multicentre prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial comparing ceramic-on-metal (CoM) to metal-on-metal (MoM) in patients receiving a THA.

Method: 390 patients received the same acetabular component and metal insert. 194 patients received a delta ceramic head (CoM) and 196 received a metal head (MoM). Metal ions were evaluated in 72 patients (36-CoM, 36-MoM). Harris Hip scores, radiographs, and metal ion levels (cobalt, chromium and titanium in serum, erythrocytes and urine) were evaluated pre-operatively and at three, 12 and 24 months.

Results: No patients were lost to follow-up. There were no differences between groups’ baseline demographics and clinical scores. At two years there were no differences in Harris Hip scores, radiographs, adverse events or postoperative complications. Both groups had overall very low median metal ion profiles with no statistically significant differences. 24 month MoM vs CoM; Serum cobalt ( g/L), mean: 1.2(+/−0.5) vs 1.1(+/−0.3), median: 0.66(range: 0.2–5.6) vs 1.0 (range: 0.3–2.7); Serum chromium ( g/L), mean: 1.1(+/−0.5) vs 1.4(+/−0.4), median: 0.86(range: 0.3–6.9) vs 1.2(range: 0.3–4.9). Urine cobalt and urine chromium ( g/day) demonstrated similar trends to serum ion levels.

Conclusion: While CoM is a new bearing surface in North America and not currently FDA or HPB approved, it has been in clinical use globally since 2006. Results of this non-inferiority RCT demonstrated no clinical outcome, metal ion, radiographic or adverse event differences between CoM and MoM cohorts.

Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a proven intervention in the management of end-stage knee arthritis. However, the demands of younger, more active patients may result in increased rates of wear and aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of a large cohort of young patients, and to assess if the outcomes of cemented implants differed from non-cemented implants.

Method: Between 1984 and 2003, 350 TKAs were performed in 283 patients who were under 55 years old. Patients were followed a minimum of 5 years. Mean age at time of surgery was 49.0±5.5 years; 64% of patients were female. Primary knee pathologies included degenerative and post-traumatic arthritis (271), inflammatory arthritis (62), and others (17). Multiple implant designs were used; 296 knees were cemented and 54 were non-cemented. The Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS) at latest follow-up was calculated. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was calculated using an endpoint of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Results: Mean follow-up was 8.7±3.4 years. Seventeen knees were revised at a mean of 7.1±4.4 years after the index procedure. Fifteen patients (twenty-five knees) died. Fifty-one patients (sixty-two knees) were lost to follow-up. Sixty patients (sixty-seven knees) had incomplete KSCRS forms. Average function and knee domains of the KSCRS were 70.0±26.7 and 87.3±16.2 respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival at five, ten, and fifteen years was 0.965±0.011, 0.941±0.015, and 0.933±0.017. The rate of revision was 5.9%. There was no statistically significantly difference observed between the outcomes of cemented and non-cemented implants, male and female patients, or inflammatory versus non-inflammatory arthritis.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that total knee replacement in younger patients can demonstrate excellent survival rates free of revision. There does not appear to be an obvious survival advantage of cementless designs, or difference in outcomes based on sex of the patient or primary diagnosis of inflammatory or non-inflammatory arthritis.

Purpose: Approximately, 10% of two-stage TKA revisions for deep sepsis become re-infected. The purpose of this study was to determine the success in terms of sepsis eradication and factors associated with failure of repeat two-stage revision TKA.

Method: Between 1991 and 2006, 129 two-stage revision TKRs for deep sepsis were performed. Ten cases which became re-infected were identified. These unfortunate patients, representing 8% of all the two-stage TKA revisions performed during this time period, are the focus of this study. Their progress and treatment interventions were followed for the purposes of this study.

Results: Ten patients were identified with a two-stage revision TKA which became re-infected. Mean patient age was 72 with 40 % being female. Following recurrent sepsis all patients went on to require more than one further two-stage revision (mean 3.67 further revision surgeries). Infection was only successfully eradicated in 28.7% of cases, the remaining require chronic suppressive therapy or have ongoing active infection. Two patients went on to have an arthrodesis (both remain on suppressive anti-biotics) and one patient had trans-femoral amputation. Staph Aureus and Coagulase neg Staph accounted for 80% of primary infective organisms with only one primary infection with methicillin resistant staph aureus (MRSA). Cultures at subsequent revisions were the same organism in 67% cases. Additional organism cultured included Pseudomonas and Propionibacterium. These patients had an increased incidence of multiple medical co-morbidities including Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Conclusion: Patients with recurrent sepsis after a two-stage revision for infection in TKR all required multiple further surgeries. Eradication of infection was only achieved in 28.7% cases. Risk factors for recurrent sepsis include Rheumatoid Arthritis and Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective blinded randomized control trial was to compare the stem migration of two cemented stem designs using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). This was essentially a safety study in which our hypothesis was that the newer design (CPCS, Smith and Nephew Inc) would demonstrate similar micro-motion to the well-established Exeter (Stryker) design.

Method: Thirty patients were consented and enrolled into a blinded RCT in which 15 patients received a dedicated RSA CPCS stem and 15 patients received a RSA Exeter stem. Both stems are collarless tapered polished cemented stems, the only difference being a slight lateral to medial taper with the CPCS design. Outcome measures were compared (Hip Society Score, WOMAC, SF-12). RSA analysis was conducted immediately postoperatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Results: No difference was found in any of the outcome measures pre-operatively or postoperatively. At 2 years, stem subsidence for the CPCS stem was approximately half that seen for the Exeter stem (0.565±0.189mm and 0.981±0.209mm respectively, p< 0.0001). In contrast, posterior (internal) rotation of the CPCS was approximately twice that of the Exeter stem (1.496±1.215° and 0.716±0.818° respectively, p=0.221). Other migration patterns were no different between stems.

Conclusion: As expected with this stem design, both stems showed some axial and rotational migration within the cement mantle. The subtle differences in design may explain the differences in migration patterns. Our data suggests that the newer CPCS design should perform well over the long-term.

Purpose: The increasing trend of morbidly obese patients (BMI 40+) requiring joint replacement is becoming a growing concern in Total Hip Replacement (THR) surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence that BMI may have on implant longevity and clinical outcome using prospectively collected patient data.

Method: A consecutive cohort of 2864 THR’s in 2488 patients with osteoarthritis and a minimum 2 years follow-up were evaluated. Patients were divided into appropriate BMI categories; Normal and Underweight (BMI< 25, n=650), Overweight (BMI 25–29.9, n=1069), Obese (BMI 30–39.9, n=981), and Morbidly Obese (BMI 40+, n=164). Pre-operative, latest, and change in clinical outcome scores (HSS, SF12, WOMAC) were analyzed using ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survivorship was determined. Categorical variables such as gender and survival status were analyzed using chi-squared.

Results: Morbidly Obese patients requiring THR’s were significantly younger than all other BMI groups by 5.4±0.83 years (p< 0.0001). Gender was also significant to BMI grouping with more females being Morbidly Obese and Normal or Underweight (p< 0.0001). All pre-operative and latest HHS and WOMAC domain scores were lower for the Morbidly Obese, significantly in all preoperative score domains and latest HHS Function (p< 0.05). The change in clinical scores from pre-operative to latest was greatest in all domains for the Morbidly Obese group. K-M cumulative survival with implant revision as the endpoint at 10 years was not different between the BMI groups. Revision rates for infection for the Morbidly Obese, Obese, Overweight, and Normal were 1.3%, 0.65%, 0.3% and 0.69% respectively. Overall Revision rates for the Morbidly Obese, Obese, Overweight, and Normal were 6.7%, 5.4%, 6.9% and 5.7% respectively and were not found to be significant (p=0.496).

Conclusion: The Morbidly Obese cohort undergoing THR had significantly lower preoperative and lower postoperative clinical outcome scores than all other BMI groups but demonstrated the most significant improvement. No difference was found in the K-M survivorship although revisions and revisions for infection were not equal between the groups

Purpose: Gender specific total knee replacement design has been a recently debated controversial topic. The purpose of this study was to investigate the survivor-ship and clinical outcomes of a large primary total knee arthroplasty cohort, specifically assessing any differences between gender groups.

Method: A consecutive cohort of 3817 patients with osteoarthritis, having undergone 5289 primary total knee replacements (3100-female, 2179-male) with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were evaluated. All surgeries were performed at the same institution by one of four surgeons. Pre-operative scores, latest scores, and change in clinical outcome scores (KSCRS, SF12, WOMAC) were compared and tested for significance using the students t-test. Kaplan Meier (K-M) survivor-ship was determined and tested for significance and categorical variables were compared using chi-squared.

Results: Men were significantly taller and heavier than women, while women had significantly higher BMI’s (p< 0.0001). While men had higher raw scores preoperatively, women demonstrated statistically greater improvement (p< 0.019) in all WOMAC domains including pain (29.87 vs. 27.30), joint stiffness (26.78 vs. 24.26), function (27.21 vs. 23.09) and total scores (28.34 vs. 25.09) There were no gender differences in improvements of the SF12 scores. Men demonstrated statistically greater improvement (p< 0.0001) in Knee Society function (22.10 vs. 18.63) and total scores (70.01 vs. 65.42), but not the Knee Society knee score (47.83 vs. 46.64, p=0.084). K-M cumulative survivorship at 10 years was 87.4±.01 for females and 82.9±.014 for males. K-M survivorship distribution was found to be significantly different between gender groups (p< 0.013, Mantel-Cox, Breslow, Tarone-Ware). Revision rates were 10.2% for males and 8.3% for females which was found to be significant by crosstabs with chi-squared (p=0.006).

Conclusion: In this cohort of patients undergoing total knee replacements, women demonstrated statistically greater implant survivorship, statistically greater improvement in WOMAC scores and less improvement in KSCR scores, leading one to question the hypothesis of an inferior clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty that is gender based.