74 – RSA WEAR ANALYSIS OF OXINIUM & COCR HEADS AGAINST XLPE AND CONVENTIONAL POLYETHYLENE IN THR: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Abstract

Purpose: Efforts to decrease polyethylene wear have lead to advances in polyethylene and counter-face technology for total hip replacement. In particular, the use of highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) and more recently, oxidized zirconium (Oxinium) heads, have demonstrated significant in-vitro improvements in THR wear. This study reports on the early clinical performance and wear (measured with RSA) of an randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing Oxinium and CoCr heads on XLPE and conventional polyethylene (CPE).

Method: Forty patients were enrolled in a RCT and stratified to receive either an Oxinium (Ox) or CoCr head against either XLPE or CPE (ie 10 patients in each group). All patients had otherwise identical THRs and had tantalum beads inserted in the pelvis and polyethylene for wear analysis. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to patient demographics and the average age was 68 years (range 57–76) at index procedure. RSA wear analysis was performed immediately post-op, at six weeks, three and six months and then at one and two years. All patients are a minimum of four years post-op (average 4.6, range 4 – 5.8). Patients were followed prospectively using validated clinical outcome scores (WOMAC, SF-12, Harris Hip scores) and radiographs.

Results: All health-related outcomes were significantly improved from pre-operative with a mean Harris Hip score and WOMAC at last follow-up of 90.9 and 80.2, respectively. Total 3D femoral head penetration at two years for each group were the following: CoCrXLPE (0.068±0.029mm); OxXLPE (0.115±0.038mm); CoCrCPE (0.187±0.079mm); and OxCPE (0.242±0.088mm). Thus, OxCPE was significantly higher than OxXLPE and CoCrXLPE but not CoCrCPE (p=0.001, p> 0.0001 and p=0.094, respectively). In other words, head penetration was higher with CPE compared to XLPE but there was no significant difference between Ox and CoCr heads. Similarily, regardless of head type (ie combining similar poly types), there was a significant difference in 3D head penetration at two years between CPE and XLPE ( CPE 0.213±0.086; XLPE 0.093±0.041, p> 0.0001).

Conclusion: The early results of this RCT, using RSA as the wear analysis tool, indicate a significant improvement in wear with XLPE compared to CPE. However, it failed to show a clear advantage to the use of Oxinium over CoCr against either polyethylene. Longer follow-up is required to determine steady-state wear rates (after bedding-in) and allow comparison between bearing groups.